The Berlin olympics was the first time there was a live TV broadcast, so when the 109 did it"s fly over it became the first aircraft on TV. First prototype used a Rolls Royce engine.
They also around that time had television/phone "booths" that people could connect and see others miles away - an early video phone concept - FaceTime, eh deutschland style. :)
Actually, that was a "one off" plane (i.e. the only plane of its type produced). If you get a good look at even the fuzzy pictures of it at certain angles, you can see that it a cruciform tail (with a Vertical Stabilizer & rudder above And BELOW. Also the engine's cooling system was basically dry ice (frozen CO2) and therefor had an extremely short range! In fact very little of it had any real connection to the Bf 109 (the (official) renaming of it to Me 109 didn't come until late in WW2!
The country was called Yugoslavia, not Yugoslav. The 109 featured an inverted V-12 engine. It was one of many inverted engine mounted plane of the Luftwaffe. This allowed the pilot to have better visibility while taxing.
You are showing the wrong model and markings of the kingdom of Yugoslavia Messerschmitts. They were equiped with E series. After the capitulation of the kingdom of Yugoslavia the pro axis Indipendent State of Croatia was formed. Their air force was also equiped ed
Another interesting fact about the BF-109 is that the wheels were attached to the fuselage making service and repairs to the wings easier but it had the effect that the plane was far more difficult to control on take off an landings, making a lot of accidents in relation take off and landing. Another advantage the BF-109 had in the beginning was fuel injection where as the first Spitfires use carburettor that would eventually make engine failure in rolls and inverted loops
It’s one of the dirty little secrets that the Germans were winning the Battle of Britain sortie for sortie in large part because of the maneuvers the fuel injected 109 could perform and the Spitfire 1, with its float carburetor, could not. History could well have been very different had the Germans stuck to purely military targets instead of terror bombing cities. This gave the RAF the breathing room to recoup its losses.
@@NikolajBlinkenbergWilladsen The Spitfire’s lower wing loading made it better in a turning battle. One of the colossally stupid moves made by the Germans (and later the Allies) was to require the fighters to stay close to the bombers. This made the bomber crews feel better, but was actually greatly to the British advantage. This is what Galland was referring to with his famous “I want Spitfires!” comment to Goering.
Like many, if not all 'dogfights' the victim was usually the one who didn't see it coming, which of course relates to pilot skill. The 109 was very advanced for its time, it had hight lift leading edge wing slats and extra large flaps, Two radiators that could be individually isolated if battle damaged. its engine was easily accessible for maintenance in the field.... It could out dive most fighters of its day. Its inverted fuel injected engine meant it could go straight into a dive without having to roll...like earlier versions of Spitfires that had carburettors.... The Bf109 justly deserves its place in history as a very advanced flying machine. With a competent and skilled pilot at the controls it was a very dangerous adversary..
An allied ace (name escapes me) was given the opportunity to fly a capture 109 after the war. "If I had know how poor the visibility out of the 109 was I'd have gotten closer."
@@jeannotschumacher1024 by “handly enough” do you mean later models lacked maneuvering ability when compared to the E? I often wondered if that was the case.
@@jeannotschumacher1024 the earlier versions were state of the art one of the best aircraft if not the best but of course it will be worse than aircraft designed 5 or more years later
@@papadopp3870 I think he means the g versions. The f was as maneuverable if not more than the e I would say as it has a much better air frame and I don’t think the wings made it worse(by that much at least)
"Fun" fact. There was another conflict in which both sides used the same aircraft: the Israël/Egypt war of 1948. Both sides were using RAF surplus spitfires. Also there was further confusion when RAF photo-recce spitfires appeared. In the mêlee both the warring sides took potshots at the RAF planes.
In 1948 the RAF PRU Spitfires would have probably been unarmed, Griffon engined, late model Spits. Taking potshots does not mean actually hitting, and shooting down the RAF PRU Spitfires, (which would have been vastly superior aircraft) to the second hand Mark Vs, or Mark IXs the Combatants were using
The Spifires used to overview the Arab V Israeli War in 1948 Would have been the Griffon Engined MarkXIX (Mark19) which in level flight could easily reach 748 KPH (465MPH). The Mark IXs or MarkVs that the combatants were using were WW2 surplus, and couldn’t get anywhere near that rate of speed, not even when they were brand new, and in 1948 they were far from new!
Another bit of trivia - the early Me109F models had a problem in that certain rpm settings of the engine caused a resonance in the fuselage that caused the tail to sheer off. This resulted in the loss of several pilots, including possibly Franz von Werra, the German pilot who made himself famous by escaping from captivity
From a POW camp in Canada, crossing the frozen St. Lawrence river to the then neutral USA. He returned to Germany in April, only to loose his life about six months later. The Bf.109 F-4 he was flying suffered engine trouble and his body was never found.
Thank you GG. I had heard somewhere of that but I’ve been slow to document it. I had heard similar cases in later model FW190 where the reason for failure was obvious, but the cause was complicated. Last week I receive some copied documents from a Luftwaffe historian living still in Germany. He knows I’m going through yet another airplane type-phase, this time, the 109. He feeds my historical hunger with his access to libraries, museum and occasionally the German Air Force. To your post on the Bf/Me 109 fighter I have questions and a comments (likely, far too many). Do you know if The Bf109 thru the E did showed a tendency to this problem? Had you heard of the Me109F breaking up in flight or of details such as conditions in which it occurred? (Such as airspeed or rpm at which resonance occurred.). Multi engine pilots are trained to synchronize their engines, “tuning” them to sound good, but I don’t think it necessarily was to prevent some kind of dissonant resonance. These documents are quite interesting.I found several communications from Luftwaffe personnel referring to an announcement changing the long time designation of the 109s manufacturer from “Bf” “Beyerische Flugzeugwerks” to Me “Messerschmitt” during the early F model work. In this regard, there is a note from a young non-commissioned officer- I think his job was akin to an air traffic controller. Writing to his friend or co-worker he sardonically states, “So, now they are “M-E”. The ally (pilots) call them that since 1940. Time for us to climb on the train! His friend (probably in the same room during a briefing or meeting, on the same sheet, responds dryly, “Yes, but you and I shall continue to call them ‘109s’ and the 210s, they shall continue as “Scheiße”! Regardless of the performance of their twin engine big brothers or their name, the 109 continues to make high interest. It certainly piqued mine! Thanks for your comment. It too, piqued my curiosity!
@@papadopp3870 I haven't done any deep dives into the Bf-109, and what I know of the problem with the early F model just comes from some internet websites that mentioned this problem and that it got fixed for the later F models. Digging thru German records would seem to be the definitive way to document all aspects of this plane - it doesn't seem that anybody has done this and put it into a book yet. German tank history, on the other hand, has been pretty well documented in a number of books by Spielberger, Jentz, etc, working with original German Army records. It may be that Luftwaffe documents either got destroyed or were just never meticulously compiled to begin with
The war found my father in the Yugoslav Army as a non-commissioned officer piloting biplanes and aero gliders. As the war was quick and short, they were unable to squeeze him into a weaker plane than the Bf-109, because the Germans would have shot him down in a few minutes. After the war, noš was briefly in aviation and gliding (they built their own gliders), and then he made small sailboats for the sea and boats and flying models. he made motors for models himself (he was a master turner). That was his job, buying tools. And that's how he ended up in traffic accident on a business trip 1969.R.I.P father.
Respect to your father mate. Sound like he was a very capable and brave person, he must have been a joy to spend time with. Laka mu zemlja i vecna slava. Pozdrav iz Beograda.
That was an interesting video. I'm gonna split hair a bit and say that the Yugoslav skin was all wrong. The Kingdom of Yugoslavia which collapsed in 1941 didn't use the red star. It was the symbol of the post-war Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (and in fact, partizan forces during the war).
First model airplane I ever built. It was a 1:48 scale 109 that I got for Christmas when I was a boy. My father bought the kit at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum in DC in the 70s.
A couple of interesting bits you didn't include: The air frame size design criteria was " the smallest air frame that would accommodate the Royce-Royce Kestrel VI engine because the German engines were not yet ready. Second is the British Handley-Page automatic slats for slow speed higher Coefficient of Lift. These leading edge high-lift devices caused problems in dog-fight maneuvering because their automatic, and unexpected, extension induced unexpected yaw and threw off the pilots aim when the later Allied competitive were the opponents.
I find it fascinated by coincidence that the Kestrel went into Bf109s before the War and the RR Merlin went into the CASA versions of the He111 after the war.
The leading edge slats did not introduce any problems in a dog fight, that is just an old wives tale. Granted, the allied test pilots may have flown a incorrectly serviced plane which spawned the slats rumour.
@@averylittle7350 A malfunction would certainly manifest itself as asymmetrical lift, likewise if out of adjustment. But when working, they would deploy with no drama.
The 109 was also sold to the Swiss during the war, who used it to intercept aircraft invading their airspace. At least one German bomber was shot down by a Swiss 109.
It was a trade for a force landed 110 night fighter filled up with state of the art eletronics he he. Goring ordered the Swiss to receive 12 brand new Gustavs for the return of the 110, wich the Swiss technicians did, but only after checking every inch of the plane!
@08:10 .. you forgot the injection vs. carburator thing between Luftwaffe and RAF. Not only because of the reclined seated position of the me109 .. but NONE of the RAF fighters could do any negative G manoeuvres ...
The specs for the aircraft that was to become the Bf109 called for an aircraft that could be transported by rail. So the wings came off and it met the spec. Because of this the landing gear on the 109 retracted into the wing and the plane could have the gear down with the wings off. This gave the 109 a narrow landing gear and the landing gear was easy to break. The 109 suffered more loses in takeoff and landing than were shot down. The 10's biggest advantage was maintenance the motor could be changed in an hour where as a spit or a mustang would take 10-12 hours. The 109 was based on Messerschmitt's Bf108 taifun(typhoon) a sport touring plane. The 109 stayed in production after the war built in Spain and called the Buchon ending production in 1958.
You could do the same with the Hawker Hurricane but that had a much wider landing gear. What Messerschmitt seemed to miss was that even with the wings off your aircraft, it isn't any narrower than the tail planes.
The BF 109 was also built by license in Spain and remained in production until 1958. The plane was operational until it was retired from service in 1965.
So that's why those hidebound senior officers in Japanese Army Air Corp did not buy the plane at the demonstration. Too hung up on glorious turning fights. Only after the Solomon Campaign that they were either dead or commit a seppuku that they moved away toward energy fighter that sacrifice some turning fights for speed and more cannons.
Just one critic- Yugoslavia in 1941 was a kingdom with different roundel and markings((Коsovo Cross))…in the video communist Yugoslavia with red star was presented…also primary aircraft of Royal Yugoslav airforce was Hawker Hurricane…most 109 where in bad shape due to lack of parts…
You missed out on the fact that the E model could get into dives that it couldn't get out of. Secondly, ground crew could be carried in the back. On D Dad, several Me109's were shot down, but half of them were carrying ground crew to the new forward bases.
yeah I believe he hit the tail when he was bailing out, that would have straight up killed him or knocked him unconscious causing him to not deploy his parachute.
The Swiss used Bf109 variants which created several recorded incidents of misidentification during allied overflights into Swiss airspace. Including the exchange of fire.
@@shanedebarra4986 Are you saying that Adolf Hitler isnt relevant ! the demon of the third Reich isnt relevant !my dear Sir , many brave service men (and women) gave their lives for your freedom and you say it isnt relevant.
@@finncarlbomholtsrensen1188 That I know it already, the FW 190 is my favorite WWII aircraft, to be more specific the FW 190 A4, what I want is actually a well thought video of the this machine, because there are so few, this aircraft as been in the shadows for to long, and deserve it's rigthfull place as one of the best war planes of it's time, had the best roll rate, the best cockpit design, had a better canopi than many aircraft when was introduced in 1941. was easy to learn to fly it, had a better landing gear than the bf 109, had a good engine, and at medium altitude was one of the most feared aircraft, even the DeHavillan mosquito feared at those altitudes, and it's final evolution (from FW 190A to FW 190D to Ta 152 H) was the best high altitude interceptor of the war
Didn't know about #3... #4 in fact is even more prominent in the FW-190. Shorter blood column = easier to withstand G forces. One of the most famous modern examples with the same feature is the F-16.
A limitation of the Bf 109 was its range. It was basically a point defense fighter and so were the British Hurricane and Spitfire. It had less than 15 minutes of active time over the target area before being needed to return to their bases or they ran out of fuel.
@@dianaforman3331 But only 5 minutes of active combat time was a true problem as related by various pilots like Adolph Galland (The First and the Last)
I remember flying these in simulators. I almost always ran low on fuel before running out of ammo with these. The P51 I always ran out of ammo long before running out of gas.
4:10 Those accidents didn't happen because the pilot couldn't see out of the cockpit. The Bf-109 had a tendency to enter a ground spin during takeoff, due to the enormous precession torque. The pilot had to step on the rudder pedal just in the right moment, and steer a bit to the opposite direction to balance the airframe. Arguably this was a design flaw, but nothing could be done about it. Those who didn't respect this habit of the plane, often ended up having to climb out of an upturned wreck. This is why the famous Hungarian fighter pilot, Tibor Tobak wrote in his memoirs: "One was unwise to first name the Messer." Also, the Royal Yugoslavian Air Force didn't use the red star as insignia. Their roundel had a white Pravoslavic cross in the middle. This was replaced with a red start after Tito's takeover. +1 fact: The radios in Bf-109G fighters were sensitive to the electric noise generated by the P-51 Mustang's electrically driven guns. When a Mustang activated its weapons main switch, all Messers received a warning within a few dozen kilometers that the "Ammies" are around, because their radio headsets emitted a characteristic buzzing noise.
Can we get a source on that last "fact" of yours? 'Cause I'm tempted to call _bull_ on that... If the radio equipment was so succeptable to electronic interference from something as insignificant as a solenoid being used on a different plane kilometers away, would it not be made useless due to interference from onboard electronics, which the 109s and 190s had plenty of, and those in other aircraft that are part of the flight?
@@grimmig13 Sources are numerous, but perhaps the most known one is the memoirs of Colonel Tibor Tobak, a Royal Hungarian Air Force fighter pilot. It's a definitive cult piece among the Hungarian aviation and war history community. Sadly, it has only been published in Hungarian and French. An English translation exists, created by yours truly, but it hasn't been published yet due to copyright issues with the author's family. The original title is "Pumák földön-égen", or "Les pumas rouges" in French, and I borrowed it for the English version, "The Red Pumas".
Very nice video! For the sake of historical correctness, please allow me two tiny corrections: the name of the country was Yugoslavia (Yugoslav is an adjective); in 1941 the insignia depicted upon the Bf-109's of the Royal Yugoslav Air Force were different (see Wikipedia's article). Those visible in the video were adopted a few years later by the Communist partisans led by Marshall Tito, and with slight modifications, used by the post-war Yugoslav Air Force.
This is kind of meta: for the last two years I have been the chief archaeologist overseeing the redevelopment of the Messerschmitt HQ and factory at Haunstetter, Augsburg. I'm in my caravan typing this - and it is parked right on top of the "Werk" known as the "Dampfblasenhalle" - here were big machine presses. If I look out of my window I can see where Hess took off from. The project has lasted nearly three years and we are nearly done. We had a live bomb uncovered here a few months back and I have uncovered numerous aircraft parts, although sometimes it is difficult to identify them. Great video
One interesting thing. The Me-109 has a V12 engine located reverse. The oil sump is up where it is less exposed to hits. The consequence is that it behaves like a radial engine at startup. I recommend the link: ruclips.net/video/mVsdWyYXdoQ/видео.html also: ruclips.net/video/H1YLwRQLB_I/видео.html
@@jeffadams9807 yes its model is officially the best 109 but bc of them being made by messerschmitt amongst more western pilots and our way of saying things back then they were very commonly referred to as me109's as well. It's the same plane but it's common to hear someone refer to them as either bf109 or me109.
@@devintaylor8608 the naming confusion is very common in all my books and encyclopedias. you're just as likely to see BF 109 as you are to see me 109. the inverted v engine is actually a fairly common design. the advantage of it is that it allows for more narrow fuselage at the top and the wide parts down where the wing is. it also is why in particular the BF/me 109 had a very cramped cockpit.
A sad end for the Star of Africa when you know that he helped the pilots he shot down by dropping notes to them with survival tips on them to help those pilot to survive in the desert… and he was a fan of American Jazz apparently
This reminds me of an old video I saw of a Swedish pilot who flew for the RAF. The BBC interviewer asked him what aerial combat was like. The Swede said the fokkers were all over the place. The fokkers were above, they were below. The fokkers were behind. Everywhere. The BBC reporter said, oh yes the Fokker is a very formidable aircraft. The Swede replied, oh no, those fokkers were Messerschmitts!!!. LOL. True story.
Excellent information on the 109 you didn’t mention about the undercarriage which was quite narrow which allowed easy transport but caused many accidents, luckily they built many more than the spitfire. No expert but the reclined position along with fuel injection gave the 109 a big advantage over the early Spitfires and Hawker Hurricane. You do wonder why Germany lost the war with so many advanced aircraft along with their early jets.
Finland never "went over to the Axis side". Finland was Co-belligerent with Germany against the Soviets, not an ally of Germany. They never fought with against any other countries that were at war with Germany and they kept an open communication link to Churchill. Finland was fighting the Soviets because they invaded Finland and accepted German help with a common enemy. Near the end of the war Finland fought the Germans that refused to leave Finnish soil, so definitely not "on the Axis side".
@@redlock4004 Germans weren't refusing to leave. They were leaving very orderly, following pre-existing plans they had made in case the Soviet Union managed to occupy Finland, and thus Germans would need to withdraw. There was even an agreement between Finns and Germans on how the Germans would leave. Finns did perform some small, restricted moves to make it look like the Finnish army was chasing the German troops out. However, that didn't please Stalin, who wanted an open war. Moscow told Finland that if the Germans aren't driven out as soon as possible by using force, the Soviet Union will send help to do it instead, which would have meant an occupation of Finland by the Red Army. And so the Lappland War began for real, resulting in a lot of unnecessary suffering and destruction.
@@patrickgriffitt6551 That issue regarding the landing gear is surprising to me, as it seems obvious that it is a safer superior design to have gear like the FW 190 and or of the Hurricane style. The ME 109 may have been a good plane but that gear!?!?
@@dub2536 I believe the gear was designed that way for the fact stated in the article. It made repairs etc to the wings a great deal easier. Side benefit would have been transportation via Box cars trucks cargo planes and so on.
G models were fitted with a mechanical engine management system to adjust prop angle/mixture/revs automatically. This was to preserve engine life but if a pilot manually adjusted prop angles the engine would overheat and blow within minutes. Some pilots converting from F models learned the hard way. In later years the Israelis bought Czech made 109's and used them to great effect, shooting down Egytptian Spitfires.
From memory what you are referring to in regards to Automatic engine management, was the Fw190 Yes the 109 had lot's of automatic systems, but the Fw190 had an actual centralised "computer management system" At least from the "F series" onwards the prop pitch was automatic (with manual control option) The Czech built 109's that were sold to the Israelis were junk compared to the original Bf109
@@jurgenebert7668 Right, the RPM and Radiator Control was still in the E-3 but not in the E-4. The FW-190 Antons also had a manual RPM control together with a switchable Automatic RPM but the D-9 and Ta's didn't. In simulated Dogfights I have learned that you lose alot of stability due to the changing torque using the automatic system. That tendency of the FW-190 to start to roll over when in a hard turn can be limitted using the manual option. The only backside of this is that you lose speed quicker. But then flying slow the plane is much more stable than the ever adjusting automatic. This is a torque problem.
Me-109 from two belligerents fighting each other, described here for Germany vs. Yugoslavia, happened again after August 1944. Not only that Romania started to receive German Me-109 after 1942, but I.A.R., the Romanian factory from Brașov, ceased to produce its good design IAR-80 in 1944, because lack of improvement made it obsolete by that moment. Instead, in early 1944 the I.A.R. factory started to manufacture Me-109 under license. So, when Romania ceased to be part of the Axis, there were even more fights between Me-109's, than they happened in Yugoslavia in 1941. Finland may also got some Me-109 (they did not manufacture under license), and Finland also started to fight in August 1944 against its former ally Germany. If someone from Finland is reading this, here is the chance to add something useful.
@@alan6832 - - Good point. You reminded me about Switzerland. I was not 100% sure about Finland (and I did not search). I did not know about Vichy France, but it seems that for the latter it was not about Me-109. It would be easy to claim now that the fights between the Me-109's of Romania versus Germany + Hungary were the biggest in numbers, compared with similar events, but I did not search that. There are chances for that: active combat between Germany and Romania was for 9 months, and the Romanian Air Force was not in the first league, but it was one of the strongest in the "second league".
IAR-80/81 were good but the rear fuselage was based on the Polish PZL P.11 and P.24! I read an account by a Romanian ace that said "When we encountered other 109's we soon worked out that if we left them (the Germans) alone, they left us alone..... only if we saw Russians (aircraft or ground forces) would we shoot at them... usually too soon or too late!"... then the Russians demanded that they surrender all German-made aircraft.
@@damienmaynard8892 - - The question is when the Russians asked the Romanians to handle their German made aircraft. There were very intense battles in the weeks following August 23, 1944, and at least in those days, the Romanians extensively used their German made aircraft against the Germans and the Hungarians. I think during the battles in Hungary, the Romanians still had these German planes, but this is to be checked. Yes, the tail of IAR-80 was inspired from the Polish airplanes, and that was to save time. The project was rejected by the Romanian government for at least one year, and then the engineers needed to speed up. The wing of Spitfire was inspired from the wing of Heinkel He 70 Blitz. As engineer, it is not a shame to get inspired from other designs. It is a shame when you copy something 100 percent and you do not add your creativity.
@@FlorinSutu and the He-112 used by the Romanians (and the Spanish) was also based on the He-70. The Hungarians fitted a radial engine to the He-70 (making it the He-170?) which performed even better!
A friend of mine here in Nottingham who was a 109 pilot told me that the Hurricane was the best fighter in the war , because one shot him down in the western desert . And also the 109 holding the world air speed record may be untrue , I think the ME 209 held that record. But I would like to say that this video was very good .
The Me 209 bore no resemblance at all to the Me109 and was build purely as a speed racer to capture the speed record. While it held the office speed record during the war, a modified P-47 cracked 500 miles per hour in 1944, making it faster that the Me209.
@@timerover4633 Not sure where you have this from - officially the Me 209 world record of 755 km/h (from 1939) lasted over 30 yers before it was surpassed by a modified Grumman F8F-2 Bearcat (777 km/h in 1969).
@@taunusman3235 I got the data from official Army Air Force tests of the modified P-47. As it was a high altitude, I do not think that it could be viewed as breaking the record, which was set at low altitude.
I remember there was a computer flight simulator at a hobby shop my dad liked to go to when I was a kid. It had MANY aircraft you could fly. I liked the BF109 because it could do things that most of the other planes couldn't. I've always thought it was a BEAUTIFUL plane.👍 I've also always thought it was a shame that such beautiful aircraft had to destroy each other in war.😔
I agree. The 109 has that rare combination of looking sinister and beautiful all at the same time. I've always been a fan if it's angular lines... the perfect match of form and function.
@@louisavondart9178 Hi, I am planning to kit myself out with a joystick and rudder pedals. My problem is that, as a novice, I am bewildered by the choices available. I was wondering if you could suggest an entry level set up. (and, what's a Trakir?) Thanks, Les.
The same g force concept was applied to the rudder pedals so that the feet of the pilots would be angled at the best position to restrict blood loss in crushing high g maneuvers.
From what I can gather Pilots had a lot of faith in the ME109 & biggest issue they had with it was on Landing due to an extremely narrow undercarriage.
yes this and the headrest blocking the pilots view to the rear were major flaws in the design. What also makes me sceptical of this video is how the bf109 is hyped up to be the ultimate dogfithing plane while planes from the uk where much more maneuvarable and similar in speed. i always thought the selling point of the 109 was it's high climb rate and performance in dives
@@Muhbautz Yeah spot on, during the Battle of Britain didn't take long to realise that to loose altitude fast & the ME109 lost a lot of its performance because of its clipped wings & if one is on your tail, cork screw vertically as it could not match the manoeuvrability of the Spit or Hurricane.
@@Wolfsschanze99 it was a formidable aircraft in the right hands, but that could be said about anything. Continued upgrades in power made it competitive with newer Allied aircraft but also negatively affected handling, making it harder to fly.
@@msquaretheoriginal Yeah, putting bigger powerplants in these airframes changed the dynamics, allies also had the same problem so development was a constant, when the US entered the War Germans were shocked at the Power US aircraft could turn on at will, it baffled them until they captured an intact aircraft & found the fuel was a really high octane.
Another fact : the 109, started life and ended its career with a Rolls Royce engine! Before the inverted V engine was ready, it was tested with a Rolls Royce Kestrel engine. After the war they were built under licence as the Buchon with Rolls Royce Merlins! The narrow track of the undercarriage, was so that the planes could be de-rigged, ie take the wings off and put them onto trains for transportation. the undercarriage was not in the wings, but on the fuselage, giving it the ability to be wheeled onto a train, but the downside that it was very tricky to land. The inverted vee used fuel injection, rather than carbs. The tail was braced with a gusset.
You are correct about the gear issue up to a point. What made it a handful on landing was the odd "toe in" cant to the main wheels. This came about because Willie Messerschmidt was reluctant to screw up the smooth upper surface of his wing with a couple of bumps that would have been required to accommodate a gear wheel with a straight track. As most airfields of the time were grass it didn't matter all that much because the wheels would just slide on the grass. It proved to be a real challenge on a paved runway with a crosswind and bested even some of its most experienced pilots.
We don’t care for the British engine it was small and relied on 150 octanes to make power it was junk. Db610 made power with 87 and thus had a 30% more power to gain.
Factoid : By the end of the war minaturisation of technology had progressed to the point within Germany that the component parts necessary for the television camera's used to broadcast the 1936 olympics had been reduced to fit within a shoebox and light enough to be used in, among other things, rockets/missiles as documented in the photos taken during the regimes testing of television guided missiles.
@@tomjustis7237 As if that's not enough, the US deliberately carried out a couple of "punitive" bombing raids against Swiss targets afterwards. Crazy to think of in this day and age, of course, but such was the mentality of a world at war.
Even the Red Baron Manfred von Richtofen preferred zooming and booming. French ace Rene Fonck was enthusiastic user of this tactic too. It worked, Fonck got over 70 aerial victories in WWI. Fokker Triplane however was not so fast, but agile and climbed "like monkey". Albatros biplanes and Fokker DVII suited well for zoom-boom. Sudden surprise was a half victory.
The video missed an important one! After the war, one Czech factory making BF-109s remained intact. This factory made the batch of 109s that constituted the first fighter squadron of the State of Israel. Yes, the Jewish State's first fighter aircraft were Nazi Bf-109s!
Thanks! It was really interesting (althought I know all the things already), you picked the really less known things about the "Messer". How about the P-38, P-39, P-40 and Navy fighters (F2A, F4F, F6F, F4U)?
I seem to remember reading somewhere that at the 1936 olympics that the flight of 109's was actually 108's with a pre production 109 flying the low level passes.
Even the 108 was advanced for its time. For the record, it was a sport/touring aircraft that could carry four passengers. It was used by the Luftwaffe and other air forces as a personnel transport/liaison aircraft.
You just keep coming up with things to blow my average screen time budget, don't you? 😁 This was fascinating. I think the Mustang from it's A-36 days through its F-51 final variant would be good. What I found interesting was the upgrade = new problems issue that plagued the G model. There was a time where whenever I was upgrading something on my PC my wife would comment, "see you tomorrow." She had come to see that each little upgrade to whatever resulted in hours and hours of fixing the multitude of problems that the "quick" upgrade created. Of course the only casualty then was my sleep. I hope Marseille's superior was haunted the rest of his days for forcing that top ace to submit.
Don't omit the Twin Mustang....I saw one in the flesh (all black gloss finish... bad ass looking!) at Reno NV (Stead) in the mid 80's...sadly if memory serves the gear was retracted with engines running , (in Texas I think) and I'm not sure if it was returned to flight....hmmm maybe I'll dig a little
@@Rhino1277HotRails There is a "Twin Mustang" on display at the Air Force Museum at Wright Patterson AFB in Ohio. The concept was (according to the info plaque) that with a greater fuel load and two pilots they could fly longer range missions escorting bombers without fatigue since the pilots could spell each other. And yes, it did look bad ass!
I wonder if cronyizm was not the biggest factor in his death...I mean, German pilots were run into the ground, with no breaks, and command was more afraid of a bad report, than actually losing the war...So I've read.
Another point...the aircraft you use as Yugoslavian ME109 are F or G models. The E or Emil had a truncated cone with the 20mm cannon that fired through the spinner. The F&G introduced the more rounded nose as pictuted. A minor item...but still.
There is no question that the BF 109 was a magnificent fighter but it should be remembered that it failed to dominate the skies over the UK in 1940 during the Battle of Britain. Although the RAF's Hurricanes and Spitfires were outnumbered 3:1 they outclassed the 109's with eight Mk 2 .303 Brownings versus two Rheinmetall 7.92 mm Borsig MG17s mounted side by side above the engine crankcase and three 20mm Oerlikon MG-FFs two in each wing and one through the airscrew spinner but with only 60 rounds per gun. The Brownings carried 300 rounds per gun which made each four gun battery so effective at close range and although the each Borsig carried 1000 rounds the rate of fire was only 1100 rounds per minute versus the RAF's 1200 with a slightly higher muzzle velocity of 2660 feet per second v the 109's 2450 and although it was supplemented 60 rounds of 20 mm cannon for each of the three Oerlikon it failed to outclass both the Spitfire's superior agility and firepower especially after the carburettor issues were sorted causing the Merlins to 'die' in a dive. It might be argued that the 109's lost up to 30 minutes combat time flying from their French airfields although the 109's service ceiling was an impressive 36,000 feet it's speed was only 357 mph at 12,300 feet versus the Spitfire's maximum speed of 362 mph at 19000 feet.It is also perhaps worth noting that the Spitfire's advanced bubble canopy gave superior visibility. The RAF could rearm and refuel their fighters in 35 minutes which was rather shorter time than the Luftwaffe. To this day it seems strange that such a powerful air force completely failed to secure air superiority over the UK in 1940. Had it continued to attack RAF airfields instead of blitzing cities the outcome may have been frighteningly different and paved the way for invasion.
Let's not forget about the Dornier Do 335 Pfeil (Arrow) or what's considered the best Japanese Fighter of the war, the Nakajima Ki-84 Hayate (Gale)...these would make for some good coffee talk
Better than the "George" fighter, ? Interesting. I saw a Japanese cartoon about the "George", and it's encounter with F6F Hellcats, over Japan....As they were defending the Islands....They had already lost. The video shiwed the 'Last stand, to the last' attidude. sad.
A buddy's father gave me his P-38 photo recon squadron's scrap book that was compiled after the war. It included a good number of loose photographs that were classified Top Secret at the time. One showed a Do 335 assembly facility that was bombed earlier and in the process of being cleaned up. They had pulled around 9 or 10 aircraft in various stages of assembly off into a field with the damaged hangers and cratered tarmac in the background. Some looked nearly completed, including two - 2 seat trainers. Three more trainers lacked props and the rest lacked engines and nose gear. The workers must of been used to seeing low flying recon flights since they looked relaxed peering up at the airplane as it flew by.
The Bf-109 may have been designed by Messerschmitt, but the Messerschmitt company did not exist at the time of the contract. The "Bf" stands for Bayerische Flugzeugwerke, Bavarian Aircraft Works, which was the actual company in the contract competition. Some time after production started, BFW was shut down and the moustache man gave Messerschmitt his own company, as well as responsibility for the Bf-109 and Bf-110, which he had designed. These planes retained the Bf prefix, rather than the Me prefix, because they were already on the books. Aircraft designed after Messerschmitt got his own company did get the Me designation, for example, the infamous Me-262.
It was Erhard Milch who let Willy Messerschmitt have his own company. Milch was the guy who organized the Luftwaffe and Lufthansa. He had a grudge with Messerschmitt and Heinkel too. The 109 and 110 were suppose to be called Me 109 Me 110 after july 1938 on orders from Reich Ministry. But they were called both in official and unofficial records/reports
It would be great to see a video on a great fighter that was never adopted, the F-20 Tigershark. Beautiful looking stilleto of a fighter that looks great from every angle.
How many of the Luftwaffe Aces became aces in the Spanish Civil war? That was pretty much a turkey shoot and it's arguable whether or not those should count. During the beginning of WWII the RAF used the tight 'Vic' formation, or even worse, the 4plane formation that was supposed to solve the fact that the formation leader had no way of realising they were under attack before he saw the flaming wreckage of his wingmen. The wingmen never saw anything because they were too busy trying to keep formation with the leader. A lot of RAF spitfires were shot down that way before they changed to the loose pair type formation you see in the later years of the war, where the wingman could actually keep a lookout for danger. So a number of Luftwaffe pilots became aces because the RAF pilots had no time to look around to spot the approaching enemy. The 'vic' formation may have worked well on earlier generation aircraft since they moved slower and the pilots could actually look around now and then, and spot an equally slow enemy approaching. (The main idea with the formation seems to have been to allow all 3 planes to attack the same larger target since older planes were usually lacking in firepower. When attacking bombers during Battle of Britain, it also worked to a certain extent as the bombers flew in the same formation, for mutual coverage, and it allowed the RAF to bring 3 fighters against 3 bombers at the same time. But it didn't work so well against the escorts... ) The Luftwaffe had abandoned the vic formation('kette') for flying in pairs or as a pair of pairs for their fighters before WWII, so had a tactical advantage.
@@carlpopkins4 The pair of planes, yes. Kette was the old 3 planes formation. For those who wouild like to know more, here's an OK place to start: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organization_of_the_Luftwaffe_(1933%E2%80%931945)#Schwarm,_Rotte_and_Kette
Other noteworthy facts about Bf 109: 1) The basis for Bf 109 (role: air dominance fighter) was Bf 108 Taifun (Typhoon). A sport & touring aircraft that his younger krieg "bruder" inherited (A, B, C, D & E variants) some geometry from: overall wing profile, rear fuselage and tail section. 2) The prototype was powered by British supplied engine: Rolls-Royce Kestrel (supercharged 60˙ V-12, 21L/1,300 in³, 700 b.h.p./520KW) 3) The fighter would have his trial by fire in Spanish civil war (B, C & D) by Legion Condor of which Werner Mölders was not only a member, but an ace by the time the war ended. 4) Until E version was introduced, Bf 109 was powered by Junkers Jumo 210D engine, driving 2-bladed fixed pitch propeller. 5) Germany sold Bf 109E-3 to Yugoslavia with expectation of being their ally before & during operation Barbarossa (Unternehmen Barbarossa). 6) While German fighter pilots were being somewhat sceptical about the concept of the new fighter, with the introduction of an radical F variant, Luftwaffe pilots were gobsmacked by it's performance (speed & handling), albeit at the cost of some of it's firepower. 7) Messerschmitt AG was officially established in 1938 by reforming Bayerische Flugzeugwerke and adopting the name of Bf 109's lead designer: Wilhelm Emil "Willy" Messerschmitt. 8) Being that this aircraft was designed & produced (among other companies involved in it's manufacture) by Messerschmitt AG, now you know why the official designation was Bf (Bayerische Flugzeugwerke) rather then Me was adopted ;)
the only thing you got right is the number 108 is just before 109. the typhoon story is,excuse me, pure Bullshit.please do not write comments without having any clue.please please.
Gerhard Barkhorn told that F-version was the best, it was fast and agile. "You could do anything with Friedrich!" Gustav was fast due to the engine output, but clumsier than Friedrich. Gustavs weaponry with 13 mm MG:s and 20 mm cannon was good.
@@esajuhanirintamaki965 Absolutely. Aber, Emil variant had two MG (2x13mm MG 131) & two cannons. Starting with Friedrich, one cannon was omitted and this armament (one Motokanone - centerline trough prop shaft 20mm MG 151/20 or 30mm 108 Kanone & 2x 13mm MG 131) was kept for all variants till the end of the war. This was remedied somewhat by installing 2x20mm MG 151/20 as underwing gunpods. However, these gunpods did had negative effective on handling (all fighters of both sides, equipped like this were affected - negatively). This was an "upgrade" for Zerstörer missions (bomber destroyer). Naturally, pilots would rather omit this extra firepower, because enemy bombers had a fighter escort and against fighters, they were handicapped in dogfight.
@@JustPeasant But Bf109 E-1 had four MG17 (7,9 mm) machine-guns two in the nose and two in wings. E-3 had two MG17 under upper nose cowlings, one MG FF (20 mm) shooting through propeller shaft and two MG FF in the wings. E-4 had no MG:s and had three MG FF (officially), as had the E-7. But it must be remembered that in Luftwaffe field shops many earlier versions were upgraded to compare later versions. It could be seen E-3/4 version with factory plate, in which reads E-1 and it is possible to see in photos version E-4, which had same weaponry as in E-3. Upgrading was made for instance to E-1:s to make them similar as E-3. It can be seen old cockpit canopies and newer canopies in same fighter Staffel (squadron) and 109:s readiness lists still mention E-3s. Wing cannons: Finnish pilots preferred removing these cannons. Cannons were no doubt effective to the Soviet Ilyushin Il-2 Stormoviks, but with skill was possibe to shoot this brute down. Hits to the Il-2s oil cooler were enough.
What I was surprised of first finding out the hurricane shot down more german aircraft in the battle for Britain than the spitfire. Copy and paste now. Two superb fighters would bear the brunt of the coming battle. The Hawker Hurricane was regarded as Fighter Command’s “workhorse.” It was teamed with a “thoroughbred,” the Supermarine Spitfire. In July 1940, the RAF had 29 squadrons of Hurricanes and 19 squadrons of Spitfires. The Spitfire was one of the greatest fighters of all time. It had been introduced in 1936 but was still around to shoot down a German jet aircraft Me 262 in 1944. It became the symbol of the Battle of Britain. The Hurricane was larger and slower, but like the Spitfire, it could turn inside the Bf 109. More than half of the German aircraft destroyed were shot down by Hurricanes. Whenever possible, the RAF had sent Spitfires to fight the Bf 109s and used Hurricanes against German bombers-but the Hurricanes had downed their share of fighters, too.
G wasn't available yet....we could probably sit over quite a few beverages and argue the comparative merits/weaknesses and remain steadfast in our beliefs....Cheers
There was a BF109 version called the 'D' version that used a TWO Bladed Propeller Instead of the more customary Three Bladed. I recently saw a GORGEOUS example of a 1/32nd scale BF109-D model, and I was SO intrigued by it that now I plan to do a "Sister Plane" to the one I saw on a modeling forum.
Though I didn't know the Yugoslav air force had BF-109's; they used the wrong insignia in their animation. The correct one is red, white, blue, roundel with a white cross over the top of it. The one used in the animation is the postwar Communist red star over the roundel not the white cross.
During the war the allies made major leap forward in aviation fuel technology. Catalytic alkylation and isomerization contributed to the development of high-performance aircraft by providing blending components for the formulation of high-octane aviation fuel. During World War II, Allied aircraft burning 100-octane fuel had a significant speed advantage over German aircraft that used 87-octane fuel. This advantage was a critical factor in the 1940 Battle of Britain. Much higher engine compression ratios could be used resulting in a huge gain in performance and also, because the density of the fuel was higher there was more mpg.
@@taumelscheibe5948 I never knew the Gustav had a retractable tail wheel. I was of the belief that it only ever had a fixed tail wheel? Edit- a quick read up shows that the early Gustavs did retain the retractable tail wheel, coupled with no main gear wing bulge and the spark scoop, yeah it is a Gustav. My bad. Carry on!
I would think a lot of casual fans of history don't know that the bf-109 had an inverted ( upside down) engine. I thought for sure that would be mentioned.
When it comes to the number of aircraft shot down the BF-109 has two big advantages. It saw more combat years then any of its counterparts having served in the Spanish Civil War. And it was pitched against more airforces with inferior and obsolete aircraft than its counterparts. It was undeniably a great aircraft though.
Too true. A huge number of those were against the Soviets in the first year of fighting on the Eastern Front. The VVS lost upwards of 70% of their aircraft in 1941, (most of the on the ground.) In the first few days of Operation Barbarossa, Soviet losses totaled over 2000 aircraft destroyed in the air and on the ground. It was an incredibly rich target environment for the Luftwaffe. The skies were filled with obsolete aircraft, flown by poorly trained inexperienced pilots. They were easy targets. Another factor often ignored was the sheer number of Bf 109s produced. It was the most produced fighter of the war, with about 34,000 made. That's 50% more than the next most produced fighter, the Spitfire, at close to 23,000.
@@shahrookhshroff3018 Never said it was. Just adding a plausible explanation that the BF-109 had more kills than any other aircraft. It was in service longer, there more of them and they faced a lot of inferior opponents (both obsolete aircraft and unskilled pilots)
@@shahrookhshroff3018 They were forced to oppose and most were caught on the ground. It is not like they attacked Germany. It is kid of funny that Germany lost two World Wars to the inferior opposition.
@@markgranger9150 Soviet apathy and incompetence ensured that the V - VS WAS "caught on the ground" on the FIRST DAY of the War ... and on several occasions thereafter. It also ensured that the V - VS foolishly kept on launching air raids on Luftwaffe air bases which were often within "binocular - observable distance" from their own, only to face more swift and serious RECIPROCATIONS from the Luftwaffe. But enjoying OVERWHELMING QUANTITATIVE ADVANTAGES OVER ONE'S OPPONENTS is another advantageous aspect of war. This was the war - winning advantage possessed by the Allies, which they enforced with the most bestial brutality!
Small capacity fuel tank. During the Battle of Britain, the ME 109 pilots could only stay 10 to 15 minutes in combat over Britain before they were low on fuel, and had to return to France.
"Small"? And what exactly are you comparing it to? During the Battle of Britain, Me-109 had higher range than any of the single-engine British fighters, including Spitfire and Hurricane. You're not comparing its range to multi-engine bombers, aren't you?
@Ranulf 84 if you did not notice, I was responding to the "Small capacity fuel tank" statement, which is absolutely not true as 109 had a very good range among the single-engine fighters of BoB, and its fuel tank was definitely not small for its class. What part of this do you not agree with?
@@sergeychmelev5270 no, the German fighters. It's a known fact that when the Me 109s crossed the Enlish Channel, the pilots had to look constantly at their fuel indicator, waiting for the red warning light to start flashing before they had timeto turn back to France. They had 20 minutes max to make it.
@@82luft49 name me a single-engine fighter plane from the Battle of Britain era that had a considerably larger fuel tank than 109. There are none. Therefore, it’s not a design flaw.
Most of what they shot down were outdated Russian aircraft. The Spitfire's had a stronger airframe whereas in a ,500mph dive with a spit the German pilots knew there was a danger of losing their wings.
@Derrick Bridges Spitfires shot down almost every type of German Fighter (excluding the crap Me163). Including two of the overhyped, Luftfanboy Ta152s.
The Spitties lost their wings quicker when at high G especially going from negative to positive or the other way around. The problem of the 109 at high speed was that it could not pull due to the immese forces on the elevator. But you could still use the trim if you wheren't allready too low. The FW-190 didn't have that problem anymore.
I'd heard that the performance of produced 109 fell drastically from the loss of cottage industry that made the wood composite fuselage, wings etc. They weren't the target but collateral damage from American bombers dropping bombs over the German countryside. Wiped out the skilled laborers and tools.
The 109 didn't use wood composites, and the Germans found ways to keep production going, moving into underground mines and other bombproof facilities. The problem was that they were running out of qualified pilots to fly them.
@@msquaretheoriginal really? They didn't use veneered wood that was coated? They weren't making them out of aluminum. I doubt they used steel because of the weight 🤔 I don't think they used fabric as they did in WW I ..but maybe they did 😕 Which leaves wood.. which was very thin veneered wood layered to create a wood composite like modern carbon fiber or kevlar/spectra.
@@davidkamaunu7887 one of the most advanced features of the 109 when it made its debut was its all-metal construction. Aluminum was plentiful in continental Europe, and the Germans were able to draw much of it from their allies and occupied territories.
@@msquaretheoriginal They tried to get Aluminium from Norway... They even sent 1000 slave laborers expressly for the purpose of expanding production facilities from 37.000 Tons to 149.000Tons/year, but luckily, allied bombers flattened the facilities using 1500 bombs in 1943, before production could start. It had also been delayed because the need to build hydro power plants, and you needed a permission from 'NVE'(Norges Vassdrag og Energivesen, /Norwegian Water and Energy resources department) and that took time. Gøring wanted to ignore that but Terboven insisted that it was better to do it by the book, to foster cooperation with the public.
Some German pilots said that the ME109 had a lot of blind spots around the canopy, that's why they had to move around to get a clear shot of allied aircraft.
The main reason for 109 victories over spitfires in the battle of britain was the ability to fly negativ g's thanks to the fuel injection, while the RR-engines at this time had carburators causing loss of power at -g's.
@@rcnelson hm, it's more or less equal on the side of plane losses. the battle of britain was given up on the german side due to them not being able to sustain the losses of planes and pilots. Apart from that, yes most ppl agree that the spitfire is a supirior fighter and the engine was also replaced with a fule injection system in later models so the diving away trick did not work for long against britain.
@@rcnelson Britian out produced Germany more or less... They had more Spitfires and Hurricanes by the end of the BoB than before it started. Germany couldn't handle the losses the same way and weren't being supported by American fighters and pilots like Britian. They also needed to carry more fuel than England who weren't taking off and travelling acrosss the English channel. The Attack fairly successful in the numbers of English planes shot down, but it completely failed in taking out Britain's RAF. That Battle was much less significant than people give it credit for... A massive majority of Germany's war effort was exhausted against Russia on the Eastern front, not the WestFront
I don't think the 109 was inferior... The model used to travel across the English channel (109E3 mainly) perhaps wasn't the best example... But when it was England in Europe and Germany not having to travel across the Channel, the Germans switched over to the 109F models and maintained 2 kills to every loss... Bu the time the Fw190 came out, England had no hope of making a superior plane... The spitfires after ww2 are better... and The later Merlin Mk9 spitfires were as good as a 109F/G again... But it was really putting that engine into other planes like the P40F or the P51D mustangs that made a big difference (that and sheer numbers). The 109 remained an effective Jager until the end of the war mostly due to good cannons and a great Engine in the DB605's... The spitfire had a better airframe overall (not so much for climbing but for a good climbrate while maintaining a good turn rate) and when Germany put the Daimler Benz into the spitfire frame, they made a plane that was faster and better at climbing than both the spitfires and the Bf109s, essentially showing the spitfire had the better airframe but a worse engine, and Bf109 had the better engine but a worse platform. I personally prefer the flight characteristics of the Bf109 and reliability of the Bf109s engine over the smooth feeling of the spitfire, mainly due to better energy retention and the better ability to swoop in vertical manovours. If it were a 10 must scoring system, then id give the Bf109 a 10 and the Spitfire a 9... But other pilots may feel it goes the other way depending on the sim and their characteristics as a pilot
@@rcnelson From 13th August to 6th September the Luftwaffe; mainly attacking airfields in the South East of England, lost 629 aircraft while the RAF lost 385.
From a neutral POV...the same way the Flying Tigers pilots got combat experience in China ahead of USA officially entering WW2, the Luftwaffe pilots got theirs in the Spanish Civil War...alas goose sauce ain gander sauce ...
No doubt the Bf109 and the Spitfire were the world's top two fighters just prior to WW2 but there are two other little known facts from that time. The first is that until the 109 got its Daimler-Benz engine the Hurricane outperformed it, outgunned it and out handled it - after the 109D the Hurricane could only out turn it. More remarkably is that Heinkel made the He113/"100" which, after some changes could do 416mph and climb at 3,287ft.min BEFORE the war began but the RLM (or just Milch, pretty much same thing!) said "no, your job is to make bombers". That attitude continued when the Me262 was made despite Heinkel again making a higher performance rival, the He280 that did 578mph and climbed at 4,923ft.min. Milch later stopped Heinkel from making the deadly "Mosquito killer" He219 leading to one Luftwaffe maintenance unit building six from spares and hiding them from the RLM! Thanks for the help Milch! (by the way, the prototype Bf109 flew with a Rolls-Royce Kestrel!)
messerschmitt had some good connections. everything heinkel did was more than competetive enough to compete with everything messerschmitt did. only Focke Wulf brought some new on the table that messerschmitt could not compete with. the BF109 was a racing horse, the fw190 was a warhorse
The He-113 was a made-up plane using photos of He-100s, which didn't enter service because their large in-wing cooling systems meant that a even single hit on the wing would result in the engine overheating and eventually bringing down the aircraft
It was Jugoslavia not Yugoslav, and they were Royalist not communist and had no red star on their colours, one of my great uncles served with the Royal Jugoslavian Air Force in ww2, before bein shot down and fighting on the ground for a time as a Chetnik, then escaping to Egypt and then UK, to fight again.
@@theslobokost Sadly that is all that i know, he is only related to me because he married an aunt who is English. More Royalist Jugoslavs were his colleagues who came to UK in 1948, and another married another aunt, i know he was a Petty Officer in the Royal Jugoslav Navy, blown off his vessel when the Germans attacked , escaped, captured, tortured and escaped again to join the Chetniks. He had been tortured by beating the bottom of his feet, so escape must have been hard. He recovered and fought on land then escaped via Trieste and to Germany to work in the Volkswagen plant after the British made him a DP Displaced Person in 1945 then allowed him to come to UK. He worked hard all his life, on a farm in East Anglia, then became a chauffeur to the Spencer family (related to Princess Diana), later mostly in the Health Service, then died from diabetes aged 80. Most of his colleagues also are now dead. They were very brave, supremely strong physically ,loyal, hard working men who never gave up their allegiance to Jugoslavia and to the King. As an Englishman who knows the true history of ww2 in Jugoslavia i was privileged and honoured to know such men as a I grew up. I do know that he was at Ravna Gora with General Mihailovic. He showed me his cap badge which had M and II signifying Mihailovic and II for King Petar II. I know very little of the one who flew for the RJAF except that he did fly with the British RAF and later as a commercial pilot. He was a very good pilot, and taught me to fly. I think they found the war hard to speak of, and sometimes they would meet and share drinks and play cards, and talk a little but always you would see tears in their eyes when they spoke of home, it was hard and very touching to see. The world has been cruel to Jugoslavia and Serbia, who have always been good allies and friends to the UK, who have not always been fair in return, sadly. May God bless you, stay safe, all the best from UK.
@@robshirewood5060 I apologize for my late reply, many thanks for Yours, my grandfather ended his war in german stalag, also a very exciting story, but not as near as Yours. Under this bloody red star like in this video we were unable for decades to comprehend what our real heroes did for Serbia, your story is adequate for some god movie. If You ever come to Serbia, send me a message thry this Channel to be my guest. All the best.
@@theslobokost No need to apologise, but thank you for the courtesy. My extended family on the Serbian side still live in eastern Serbia. Thanks for the offer of hospitality, if i ever get the chance i will contact, it reminds me of the typical hospitality of Serbian people here in UK who always welcomed me, and of the golden hearted Serbs who in ww2 gave of their poor food supplies to British POW's on trains from Greece going to Germany at great cost to themselves. God bless and all the best to you ,stay safe
The bf109 used 87 octanes and if it used 150 octanes that the allies used it be 30% faster because of the high wing loading! Wings were very narrow vs something like a big fat spitfire
I read something about aircraft canopies that I didn’t know and surprised me greatly. It was in the book Spitfire by John Nichol which contains several first-hand accounts by Spitfire pilots during the Battle of Britain who state that they would slide back the canopy just before entering combat to improve visibility. So they would actually fight with the canopy open. Note this could be done on the Spitfire because the canopy slid back but not on the BF-109 where the canopy was hinged to the side. Not sure how far this practice extended into WWII, you have to remember that the Battle of Britain was early in the war and not much earlier the RAF would have been using open cockpit biplanes. Also many of the young pilots in the Battle Britain had less than 20 hours flying experience and had possibly flown more in open canopy trainers than in closed canopy aircraft - so more used to open canopy.
The problem here is that a open cockpit at high speeds tend to get the canopy ripped off and also it would shake like crazy on the joints. Also it would be freaking loud and windy inside. They however did fly slow with open cockpit sometimes but not in fights except they forgot or had no time to close it before engagement. It is known that USN fighters had their canopies open on landing and take off but that was a safety thing, because it was quite a problem to open the canopy when under water. Also the canopy frames where much more durable. You can see that especcially in the F-4U Corsair even in the Korea Conflict.
@@WanderfalkeAT I’m not suggesting that is what Spitfire pilots should have done, I’m saying what actual real Spitfire pilots said they did do. Obviously couldn’t do that on a BF-109 as the canopy hinges to the side whereas it slides back on the Spitfire.
The spitfire had a fuel tank in front of the pilot and would cause pilots to be burned severely. It is hard to open any cockpit when your hands are burnt.
I use to build this model plane as a child in 1972. Paint it, put its decals!! Good review! I just subscribed today, July 12, 2022. Greetings from Hollywood California.
The one thing that was problematic for 109 pilots (particularly for the young or inexperienced) was the A-frame landing gear which was directly under the fuselage…on an unpaved airstrip a rut or upturn peat and it’s ass over tits,which made landings and takeoffs pretty interesting,even sometimes for experienced pilots….
Yes. I heard somewhere that one out of three pilots killed in the 109 were killed in landing or takeoff. What made it worse was the 'lunchbox' hinged canopy. This meant that it could not be open in flight, takeoff or landing. If the plane flipped on the ground the pilot was trapped inside and often burned to death in his plane.
@@edwardcnnell2853 experienced 109 pilots would (if they weren’t wounded or the canopy release latch wasn’t damaged)try to put the nose up get enough altitude to invert the aircraft and simply fall out,there was also an blank explosive charge that the pilot could pull that would jettisoned the canopy (sometimes this didn’t always work) but there are trade offs with practically any combat aircraft and the 109 had its share…
Another interesting 109 fact. It was the first fighter aircraft flown by the Israeli Air Force when Israel became a nation since so many had been built. It also saw action in 1948 in the first Arab-Israeli war.
The Czech 109s were procured to Israel by a young Israeli spy, Robert Maxwell, whose daughter Ghislaine run the infamous underage sex trafficking/blackmail ring with Jeffrey Epstein...
It wasn't superior to the Supermarine Spitfire. Equal at best during the battle of Britian. And then surpassed as Spitfire variants got better. (Fuel injection and cannons helped)
@@freightdogfreddy and then in 1943 the Griffon (not griffin) engined Spitfires arrived! Nothing the Germans had at that time could catch them in level flight, or a climb, and they were armed with 20mm cannons and .5 machine guns. The 109s weren’t fast enough or powerful enough. It was only later on the German Jets and Rocket propelled aircraft equaled or surpassed them, but there were far fewer of them.
Messerschmidt wasnt a company at the time when the German Luftwaffe looked for a new Airplane. Thats also the reason why it is called BF (Bayrische Flugwerke). That company later became Messerschmidt (1938)
I like the informative information on the Messerschmitt I wish you would have liberated on the kind of firepower the plane carried during their actual engagement's against the other planes.
The Berlin olympics was the first time there was a live TV broadcast, so when the 109 did it"s fly over it became the first aircraft on TV. First prototype used a Rolls Royce engine.
They also around that time had television/phone "booths" that people could connect and see others miles away - an early video phone concept - FaceTime, eh deutschland style. :)
The Rolls Royce engine was called the Kestrel. The British had a habit naming their aircraft, and engines, after birds.
@@carlpopkins4 Americans painted pictures of birds on the sides of their planes.
So did the Germans.
Actually, that was a "one off" plane (i.e. the only plane of its type produced). If you get a good look at even the fuzzy pictures of it at certain angles, you can see that it a cruciform tail (with a Vertical Stabilizer & rudder above And BELOW. Also the engine's cooling system was basically dry ice (frozen CO2) and therefor had an extremely short range!
In fact very little of it had any real connection to the Bf 109 (the (official) renaming of it to Me 109 didn't come until late in WW2!
The country was called Yugoslavia, not Yugoslav. The 109 featured an inverted V-12 engine. It was one of many inverted engine mounted plane of the Luftwaffe. This allowed the pilot to have better visibility while taxing.
You are showing the wrong model and markings of the kingdom of Yugoslavia Messerschmitts. They were equiped with E series. After the capitulation of the kingdom of Yugoslavia the pro axis Indipendent State of Croatia was formed. Their air force was also equiped ed
Most German fighters like the Focke Wulf Fw-190/D-9 commonly had the inverted V-12 engine but not all did, mainly late war aircraft
“Lower Slobovia”! 😆😂🤣
But it was much easier for the ground crew to work on. Taxing had nothing to do with the decision.
@@juliusdream2683thought it had to do with oil cooling of the pistons.
Another interesting fact about the BF-109 is that the wheels were attached to the fuselage making service and repairs to the wings easier but it had the effect that the plane was far more difficult to control on take off an landings, making a lot of accidents in relation take off and landing.
Another advantage the BF-109 had in the beginning was fuel injection where as the first Spitfires use carburettor that would eventually make engine failure in rolls and inverted loops
It’s one of the dirty little secrets that the Germans were winning the Battle of Britain sortie for sortie in large part because of the maneuvers the fuel injected 109 could perform and the Spitfire 1, with its float carburetor, could not. History could well have been very different had the Germans stuck to purely military targets instead of terror bombing cities. This gave the RAF the breathing room to recoup its losses.
@@ricksunderland1421 exactly, and when the later spitfire got fuel injected engines they got superiority due to better maneuverability
@@NikolajBlinkenbergWilladsen The Spitfire’s lower wing loading made it better in a turning battle. One of the colossally stupid moves made by the Germans (and later the Allies) was to require the fighters to stay close to the bombers. This made the bomber crews feel better, but was actually greatly to the British advantage. This is what Galland was referring to with his famous “I want Spitfires!” comment to Goering.
@Peter Lorimer Bad choice of words, but a burp is a long time in combat. That carburetor certainly saved many a German pilot’s life. 👍
Ground loops were common when the 109's tail wheel wasn't locked & "Miss Shillings Orifice" fixed the Merlin carby problem.
Like many, if not all 'dogfights' the victim was usually the one who didn't see it coming, which of course relates to pilot skill. The 109 was very advanced for its time, it had hight lift leading edge wing slats and extra large flaps, Two radiators that could be individually isolated if battle damaged. its engine was easily accessible for maintenance in the field.... It could out dive most fighters of its day. Its inverted fuel injected engine meant it could go straight into a dive without having to roll...like earlier versions of Spitfires that had carburettors.... The Bf109 justly deserves its place in history as a very advanced flying machine. With a competent and skilled pilot at the controls it was a very dangerous adversary..
but it was not a good plane.
too much pressure per m2 on the wings.
therefore it's later versions were not handly enough.
An allied ace (name escapes me) was given the opportunity to fly a capture 109 after the war. "If I had know how poor the visibility out of the 109 was I'd have gotten closer."
@@jeannotschumacher1024 by “handly enough” do you mean later models lacked maneuvering ability when compared to the E? I often wondered if that was the case.
@@jeannotschumacher1024 the earlier versions were state of the art one of the best aircraft if not the best but of course it will be worse than aircraft designed 5 or more years later
@@papadopp3870 I think he means the g versions. The f was as maneuverable if not more than the e I would say as it has a much better air frame and I don’t think the wings made it worse(by that much at least)
"Fun" fact. There was another conflict in which both sides used the same aircraft: the Israël/Egypt war of 1948. Both sides were using RAF surplus spitfires. Also there was further confusion when RAF photo-recce spitfires appeared. In the mêlee both the warring sides took potshots at the RAF planes.
In 1948 the RAF PRU Spitfires would have probably been unarmed, Griffon engined, late model Spits.
Taking potshots does not mean actually hitting, and shooting down the RAF PRU Spitfires, (which would have been vastly superior aircraft) to the second hand Mark Vs, or Mark IXs the Combatants were using
The Spifires used to overview the Arab V Israeli War in 1948 Would have been the Griffon Engined MarkXIX (Mark19) which in level flight could easily reach 748 KPH (465MPH).
The Mark IXs or MarkVs that the combatants were using were WW2 surplus, and couldn’t get anywhere near that rate of speed, not even when they were brand new, and in 1948 they were far from new!
The Israelis also had replaced their 109s with the much preferred Spitfire. To be fair, the 109s they had flew, had been re-engined and underpowered.
Another bit of trivia - the early Me109F models had a problem in that certain rpm settings of the engine caused a resonance in the fuselage that caused the tail to sheer off. This resulted in the loss of several pilots, including possibly Franz von Werra, the German pilot who made himself famous by escaping from captivity
From a POW camp in Canada, crossing the frozen St. Lawrence river to the then neutral USA. He returned to Germany in April, only to loose his life about six months later. The Bf.109 F-4 he was flying suffered engine trouble and his body was never found.
Thank you GG. I had heard
somewhere of that but I’ve been slow to document it. I had heard similar cases in later model FW190 where the reason for failure was obvious, but the cause was complicated.
Last week I receive some copied documents from a Luftwaffe historian living still in Germany. He knows I’m going through yet another airplane type-phase, this time, the 109. He feeds my historical hunger with his access to libraries, museum and occasionally the German Air Force.
To your post on the Bf/Me 109 fighter I have questions and a comments (likely, far too many).
Do you know if The Bf109 thru the E did showed a tendency to this problem?
Had you heard of the Me109F breaking up in flight or of details such as conditions in which it occurred? (Such as airspeed or rpm at which resonance occurred.). Multi engine pilots are trained to synchronize their engines, “tuning” them to sound good, but I don’t think it necessarily was to prevent some kind of dissonant resonance.
These documents are quite interesting.I found several communications from Luftwaffe personnel referring to an announcement changing the long time designation of the 109s manufacturer from “Bf” “Beyerische Flugzeugwerks” to Me “Messerschmitt” during the early F model work.
In this regard, there is a note from a young non-commissioned officer- I think his job was akin to an air traffic controller. Writing to his friend or co-worker he sardonically states, “So, now they are “M-E”. The ally (pilots) call them that since 1940. Time for us to climb on the train!
His friend (probably in the same room during a briefing or meeting, on the same sheet, responds dryly, “Yes, but you and I shall continue to call them ‘109s’ and the 210s, they shall continue as “Scheiße”!
Regardless of the performance of their twin engine big brothers or their name, the 109 continues to make high interest. It certainly piqued mine!
Thanks for your comment. It too, piqued my curiosity!
@@papadopp3870 I haven't done any deep dives into the Bf-109, and what I know of the problem with the early F model just comes from some internet websites that mentioned this problem and that it got fixed for the later F models.
Digging thru German records would seem to be the definitive way to document all aspects of this plane - it doesn't seem that anybody has done this and put it into a book yet.
German tank history, on the other hand, has been pretty well documented in a number of books by Spielberger, Jentz, etc, working with original German Army records.
It may be that Luftwaffe documents either got destroyed or were just never meticulously compiled to begin with
@Will Rose ..nope...that wasnt it.
I read that too kind of ironic seeing how the got rid of the tail brace on the F
The war found my father in the Yugoslav Army as a non-commissioned officer piloting biplanes and aero gliders. As the war was quick and short, they were unable to squeeze him into a weaker plane than the Bf-109, because the Germans would have shot him down in a few minutes. After the war, noš was briefly in aviation and gliding (they built their own gliders), and then he made small sailboats for the sea and boats and flying models. he made motors for models himself (he was a master turner). That was his job, buying tools. And that's how he ended up in traffic accident on a business trip 1969.R.I.P father.
Respect to your father mate. Sound like he was a very capable and brave person, he must have been a joy to spend time with. Laka mu zemlja i vecna slava. Pozdrav iz Beograda.
That was an interesting video. I'm gonna split hair a bit and say that the Yugoslav skin was all wrong. The Kingdom of Yugoslavia which collapsed in 1941 didn't use the red star. It was the symbol of the post-war Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (and in fact, partizan forces during the war).
You know your history, my friend!
Unfortunate War Thunder do not have old pre WW2 flag or insignija of Jugoslavija state , so I think he use the only one Jugoslavija marking.
@@moxie_ST Good point. He has to go with vids that are available which doesn't detract from the historical content.
Yep I'm fixing this in an upcoming video.
@@TJ3 also re narrate the 1st 13secs.
First model airplane I ever built. It was a 1:48 scale 109 that I got for Christmas when I was a boy. My father bought the kit at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum in DC in the 70s.
A couple of interesting bits you didn't include:
The air frame size design criteria was " the smallest air frame that would accommodate the Royce-Royce Kestrel VI engine because the German engines were not yet ready.
Second is the British Handley-Page automatic slats for slow speed higher Coefficient of Lift. These leading edge high-lift devices caused problems in dog-fight maneuvering because their automatic, and unexpected, extension induced unexpected yaw and threw off the pilots aim when the later Allied competitive were the opponents.
I find it fascinated by coincidence that the Kestrel went into Bf109s before the War and the RR Merlin went into the CASA versions of the He111 after the war.
The leading edge slats did not introduce any problems in a dog fight, that is just an old wives tale. Granted, the allied test pilots may have flown a incorrectly serviced plane which spawned the slats rumour.
The modern Luftwaffe insisted that leading edge slats must be fitted to their F4 Phantoms.
@@juslitor The leading edge slats certainly did cause problems in a dogfight. The "Allied" pilot Gunther Rall had something to say on the matter.
@@averylittle7350 A malfunction would certainly manifest itself as asymmetrical lift, likewise if out of adjustment. But when working, they would deploy with no drama.
The 109 was also sold to the Swiss during the war, who used it to intercept aircraft invading their airspace. At least one German bomber was shot down by a Swiss 109.
It was a trade for a force landed 110 night fighter filled up with state of the art eletronics he he. Goring ordered the Swiss to receive 12 brand new Gustavs for the return of the 110, wich the Swiss technicians did, but only after checking every inch of the plane!
("Sgt.J."). "Ha, Ha, ha,ha. ha" A German bomber? Well... That'll teach em. 😜
The swiss air-force had only Bf109E-1 and E-3 and these, 10 E-1 and 50 E-3 were ordered in 1938 and delivered before ww2.
@@felixropke9777 yes. And the G's arrived in 1944
@@LeopardIL2 you are quite right, it wasn't a traditional cash deal
@08:10 .. you forgot the injection vs. carburator thing between Luftwaffe and RAF. Not only because of the reclined seated position of the me109 .. but NONE of the RAF fighters could do any negative G manoeuvres ...
Nice video! I loved how you mentioned Hans-Joachim Marseille. My favourite German ace from ww2
Yeah, that guy was totally rad.
The specs for the aircraft that was to become the Bf109 called for an aircraft that could be transported by rail. So the wings came off and it met the spec. Because of this the landing gear on the 109 retracted into the wing and the plane could have the gear down with the wings off. This gave the 109 a narrow landing gear and the landing gear was easy to break. The 109 suffered more loses in takeoff and landing than were shot down. The 10's biggest advantage was maintenance the motor could be changed in an hour where as a spit or a mustang would take 10-12 hours. The 109 was based on Messerschmitt's Bf108 taifun(typhoon) a sport touring plane. The 109 stayed in production after the war built in Spain and called the Buchon ending production in 1958.
You could do the same with the Hawker Hurricane but that had a much wider landing gear. What Messerschmitt seemed to miss was that even with the wings off your aircraft, it isn't any narrower than the tail planes.
Amazing ... German technology being easier to work on than comparable British or American tech.
The BF 109 was also built by license in Spain and remained in production until 1958. The plane was operational until it was retired from service in 1965.
So that's why those hidebound senior officers in Japanese Army Air Corp did not buy the plane at the demonstration. Too hung up on glorious turning fights.
Only after the Solomon Campaign that they were either dead or commit a seppuku that they moved away toward energy fighter that sacrifice some turning fights for speed and more cannons.
It was such Spanish aircraft that were used in the excellent film ‘Battle of Britain’.
Since there weren't many DB'S left after WW2, the Spanish used the Merlin in its place.
Spanish also used the Heinkell 111 as well after the war
The Spaniards the HE111 to try to keep their colonies on the African continent.
Just one critic- Yugoslavia in 1941 was a kingdom with different roundel and markings((Коsovo Cross))…in the video communist Yugoslavia with red star was presented…also primary aircraft of Royal Yugoslav airforce was Hawker Hurricane…most 109 where in bad shape due to lack of parts…
also the Yugo 109s in the vid were later models F and G, not Es.
@@Citadin after '44. 1940/41 was the earlier models.
The IK-2 and IK-3 were there too! and Hawker Fury!
You missed out on the fact that the E model could get into dives that it couldn't get out of. Secondly, ground crew could be carried in the back. On D Dad, several Me109's were shot down, but half of them were carrying ground crew to the new forward bases.
It's sad that Marseille was killed by a plane he didn't want to fly.
yeah I believe he hit the tail when he was bailing out, that would have straight up killed him or knocked him unconscious causing him to not deploy his parachute.
The DB-605 had issues with fires while flying and that is why he died. Had he been able to stay in an F model he would have lived longer.
@@SweetSniper5197 I think his parachute caught on to the tail
The Swiss used Bf109 variants which created several recorded incidents of misidentification during allied overflights into Swiss airspace. Including the exchange of fire.
Adolf Hitler was Austrian not German.
@@swarthyjake4433 ?
@@shanedebarra4986 Its true , you can check it out yourself
@@swarthyjake4433 Yes, I'm aware, thank you... just wondering how it's relevant to the Bf109 ? Or Swiss use of the aircraft?
@@shanedebarra4986 Are you saying that Adolf Hitler isnt relevant ! the demon of the third Reich isnt relevant !my dear Sir , many brave service men (and women) gave their lives for your freedom and you say it isnt relevant.
I would like to see a video about versions of the P-40 or spitfire.
Me too.
Also Hurricane.
@@hariszark7396 same
Count me in!
Definitely the P-40.
Typhoon
We earnestly look forward to a series on the Messerschmitt Me - 109's "big brother", the FW 190, especially the later TA - 152 C and H models.
Yes!!! I want to see the less know facts of the Butcher Bird
@@ricardobeltranmonribot3182 Kurt Tank was the best designer and his plane was the best plane of the war, faster and turning inside its opponents.
@@finncarlbomholtsrensen1188 That I know it already, the FW 190 is my favorite WWII aircraft, to be more specific the FW 190 A4, what I want is actually a well thought video of the this machine, because there are so few, this aircraft as been in the shadows for to long, and deserve it's rigthfull place as one of the best war planes of it's time, had the best roll rate, the best cockpit design, had a better canopi than many aircraft when was introduced in 1941. was easy to learn to fly it, had a better landing gear than the bf 109, had a good engine, and at medium altitude was one of the most feared aircraft, even the DeHavillan mosquito feared at those altitudes, and it's final evolution (from FW 190A to FW 190D to Ta 152 H) was the best high altitude interceptor of the war
@@ricardobeltranmonribot3182 And even the last versions, having replaced the original radial engine with an inline, had the round radiator still.
I'll take some crazy stuka or ju88 story anytime.
Didn't know about #3... #4 in fact is even more prominent in the FW-190. Shorter blood column = easier to withstand G forces. One of the most famous modern examples with the same feature is the F-16.
A limitation of the Bf 109 was its range. It was basically a point defense fighter and so were the British Hurricane and Spitfire. It had less than 15 minutes of active time over the target area before being needed to return to their bases or they ran out of fuel.
Actually 412 miles wasn't bad versus the Spitfires 395 and the Hurricane's 505.
@@dianaforman3331 But only 5 minutes of active combat time was a true problem as related by various pilots like Adolph Galland (The First and the Last)
I remember flying these in simulators. I almost always ran low on fuel before running out of ammo with these. The P51 I always ran out of ammo long before running out of gas.
@@wardaddy6002yeah they P51s could fly for long flights one of the main reasons if not the main reason they were used as escorts for bombers too
4:10 Those accidents didn't happen because the pilot couldn't see out of the cockpit. The Bf-109 had a tendency to enter a ground spin during takeoff, due to the enormous precession torque. The pilot had to step on the rudder pedal just in the right moment, and steer a bit to the opposite direction to balance the airframe. Arguably this was a design flaw, but nothing could be done about it. Those who didn't respect this habit of the plane, often ended up having to climb out of an upturned wreck. This is why the famous Hungarian fighter pilot, Tibor Tobak wrote in his memoirs: "One was unwise to first name the Messer."
Also, the Royal Yugoslavian Air Force didn't use the red star as insignia. Their roundel had a white Pravoslavic cross in the middle. This was replaced with a red start after Tito's takeover.
+1 fact: The radios in Bf-109G fighters were sensitive to the electric noise generated by the P-51 Mustang's electrically driven guns. When a Mustang activated its weapons main switch, all Messers received a warning within a few dozen kilometers that the "Ammies" are around, because their radio headsets emitted a characteristic buzzing noise.
That's really bizarre (edit: about the elec. interference). To strange not to be true. Thanks for sharing 💯
That's a really neat fact about the radios,thank you for sharing it,109s were fine machines.
Can we get a source on that last "fact" of yours?
'Cause I'm tempted to call _bull_ on that... If the radio equipment was so succeptable to electronic interference from something as insignificant as a solenoid being used on a different plane kilometers away, would it not be made useless due to interference from onboard electronics, which the 109s and 190s had plenty of, and those in other aircraft that are part of the flight?
@@grimmig13 Sources are numerous, but perhaps the most known one is the memoirs of Colonel Tibor Tobak, a Royal Hungarian Air Force fighter pilot. It's a definitive cult piece among the Hungarian aviation and war history community. Sadly, it has only been published in Hungarian and French. An English translation exists, created by yours truly, but it hasn't been published yet due to copyright issues with the author's family. The original title is "Pumák földön-égen", or "Les pumas rouges" in French, and I borrowed it for the English version, "The Red Pumas".
@@nematolvajkergetok5104 Can You cite some of those other sources? Memoirs are... well, You know - memoirs.
Very nice video! For the sake of historical correctness, please allow me two tiny corrections: the name of the country was Yugoslavia (Yugoslav is an adjective); in 1941 the insignia depicted upon the Bf-109's of the Royal Yugoslav Air Force were different (see Wikipedia's article). Those visible in the video were adopted a few years later by the Communist partisans led by Marshall Tito, and with slight modifications, used by the post-war Yugoslav Air Force.
…also not in service of a country called “Yugoslav.”
This is kind of meta: for the last two years I have been the chief archaeologist overseeing the redevelopment of the Messerschmitt HQ and factory at Haunstetter, Augsburg. I'm in my caravan typing this - and it is parked right on top of the "Werk" known as the "Dampfblasenhalle" - here were big machine presses. If I look out of my window I can see where Hess took off from. The project has lasted nearly three years and we are nearly done. We had a live bomb uncovered here a few months back and I have uncovered numerous aircraft parts, although sometimes it is difficult to identify them. Great video
One interesting thing. The Me-109 has a V12 engine located reverse. The oil sump is up where it is less exposed to hits. The consequence is that it behaves like a radial engine at startup.
I recommend the link: ruclips.net/video/mVsdWyYXdoQ/видео.html
also: ruclips.net/video/H1YLwRQLB_I/видео.html
And a big reason Germans enjoyed having their guns in the nose, with no converging issues. And cannon in the prop hub.
U Mean The ME-262, That's The German JET Fighter...
The 109 Was The BF-109 & The Other German Fighter Was The FW-190...
@@jeffadams9807 yes its model is officially the best 109 but bc of them being made by messerschmitt amongst more western pilots and our way of saying things back then they were very commonly referred to as me109's as well. It's the same plane but it's common to hear someone refer to them as either bf109 or me109.
inverted V-12! essentially a 'dry sump' engine - and it was fuel injected, unlike the carburetored Spitfire
@@devintaylor8608 the naming confusion is very common in all my books and encyclopedias. you're just as likely to see BF 109 as you are to see me 109. the inverted v engine is actually a fairly common design. the advantage of it is that it allows for more narrow fuselage at the top and the wide parts down where the wing is. it also is why in particular the BF/me 109 had a very cramped cockpit.
A sad end for the Star of Africa when you know that he helped the pilots he shot down by dropping notes to them with survival tips on them to help those pilot to survive in the desert… and he was a fan of American Jazz apparently
This reminds me of an old video I saw of a Swedish pilot who flew for the RAF. The BBC interviewer asked him what aerial combat was like. The Swede said the fokkers were all over the place. The fokkers were above, they were below. The fokkers were behind. Everywhere. The BBC reporter said, oh yes the Fokker is a very formidable aircraft. The Swede replied, oh no, those fokkers were Messerschmitts!!!. LOL. True story.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂👍
Excellent information on the 109 you didn’t mention about the undercarriage which was quite narrow which allowed easy transport but caused many accidents, luckily they built many more than the spitfire.
No expert but the reclined position along with fuel injection gave the 109 a big advantage over the early Spitfires and Hawker Hurricane.
You do wonder why Germany lost the war with so many advanced aircraft along with their early jets.
Arrogance and hubris.
The Hawker Hurricane was used by both the Allies and the Fins , who went over to the axis side
Interesting
Finland never "went over to the Axis side". Finland was Co-belligerent with Germany against the Soviets, not an ally of Germany. They never fought with against any other countries that were at war with Germany and they kept an open communication link to Churchill. Finland was fighting the Soviets because they invaded Finland and accepted German help with a common enemy. Near the end of the war Finland fought the Germans that refused to leave Finnish soil, so definitely not "on the Axis side".
@@redlock4004 Germans weren't refusing to leave. They were leaving very orderly, following pre-existing plans they had made in case the Soviet Union managed to occupy Finland, and thus Germans would need to withdraw. There was even an agreement between Finns and Germans on how the Germans would leave. Finns did perform some small, restricted moves to make it look like the Finnish army was chasing the German troops out. However, that didn't please Stalin, who wanted an open war. Moscow told Finland that if the Germans aren't driven out as soon as possible by using force, the Soviet Union will send help to do it instead, which would have meant an occupation of Finland by the Red Army. And so the Lappland War began for real, resulting in a lot of unnecessary suffering and destruction.
romanians used the hurricane too
@@herrakaarme yeah…..,Germans weren’t reusing to leave Finland just like trump wasn’t refusing to accept the election results. Nice gaslight.
The narrow landing gear resulted in many ground loop problems on landing.
One of multiple reasons I consider the FW 190 in multiple ways superior. Just my humble opinion.
Spitfire had narrow landing gear also. Hurricane did not.
@@patrickgriffitt6551 That issue regarding the landing gear is surprising to me, as it seems obvious that it is a safer superior design to have gear like the FW 190 and or of the Hurricane style. The ME 109 may have been a good plane but that gear!?!?
@@dub2536 I believe the gear was designed that way for the fact stated in the article. It made repairs etc to the wings a great deal easier. Side benefit would have been transportation via Box cars trucks cargo planes and so on.
@@patrickgriffitt6551 OK. ty!
G models were fitted with a mechanical engine management system to adjust prop angle/mixture/revs automatically. This was to preserve engine life but if a pilot manually adjusted prop angles the engine would overheat and blow within minutes. Some pilots converting from F models learned the hard way.
In later years the Israelis bought Czech made 109's and used them to great effect, shooting down Egytptian Spitfires.
From memory what you are referring to in regards to Automatic engine management, was the Fw190
Yes the 109 had lot's of automatic systems, but the Fw190 had an actual centralised "computer management system"
At least from the "F series" onwards the prop pitch was automatic (with manual control option)
The Czech built 109's that were sold to the Israelis were junk compared to the original Bf109
This automatic engine management was introduced with the E4 model, not with the G.
@@jurgenebert7668 Right, the RPM and Radiator Control was still in the E-3 but not in the E-4. The FW-190 Antons also had a manual RPM control together with a switchable Automatic RPM but the D-9 and Ta's didn't. In simulated Dogfights I have learned that you lose alot of stability due to the changing torque using the automatic system. That tendency of the FW-190 to start to roll over when in a hard turn can be limitted using the manual option. The only backside of this is that you lose speed quicker. But then flying slow the plane is much more stable than the ever adjusting automatic. This is a torque problem.
Outstanding historical content and very interesting information. Good video
Me-109 from two belligerents fighting each other, described here for Germany vs. Yugoslavia, happened again after August 1944. Not only that Romania started to receive German Me-109 after 1942, but I.A.R., the Romanian factory from Brașov, ceased to produce its good design IAR-80 in 1944, because lack of improvement made it obsolete by that moment. Instead, in early 1944 the I.A.R. factory started to manufacture Me-109 under license. So, when Romania ceased to be part of the Axis, there were even more fights between Me-109's, than they happened in Yugoslavia in 1941.
Finland may also got some Me-109 (they did not manufacture under license), and Finland also started to fight in August 1944 against its former ally Germany. If someone from Finland is reading this, here is the chance to add something useful.
Didn't identical planes also fight for and against Vichy France? including P-36? And Finland? and Switzerland?
@@alan6832 - - Good point. You reminded me about Switzerland. I was not 100% sure about Finland (and I did not search). I did not know about Vichy France, but it seems that for the latter it was not about Me-109. It would be easy to claim now that the fights between the Me-109's of Romania versus Germany + Hungary were the biggest in numbers, compared with similar events, but I did not search that. There are chances for that: active combat between Germany and Romania was for 9 months, and the Romanian Air Force was not in the first league, but it was one of the strongest in the "second league".
IAR-80/81 were good but the rear fuselage was based on the Polish PZL P.11 and P.24! I read an account by a Romanian ace that said "When we encountered other 109's we soon worked out that if we left them (the Germans) alone, they left us alone..... only if we saw Russians (aircraft or ground forces) would we shoot at them... usually too soon or too late!"... then the Russians demanded that they surrender all German-made aircraft.
@@damienmaynard8892 - - The question is when the Russians asked the Romanians to handle their German made aircraft. There were very intense battles in the weeks following August 23, 1944, and at least in those days, the Romanians extensively used their German made aircraft against the Germans and the Hungarians. I think during the battles in Hungary, the Romanians still had these German planes, but this is to be checked. Yes, the tail of IAR-80 was inspired from the Polish airplanes, and that was to save time. The project was rejected by the Romanian government for at least one year, and then the engineers needed to speed up.
The wing of Spitfire was inspired from the wing of Heinkel He 70 Blitz. As engineer, it is not a shame to get inspired from other designs. It is a shame when you copy something 100 percent and you do not add your creativity.
@@FlorinSutu and the He-112 used by the Romanians (and the Spanish) was also based on the He-70. The Hungarians fitted a radial engine to the He-70 (making it the He-170?) which performed even better!
"The country of Yugoslav..."
Wow. A history channel that makes up the names of nations. That's just great.
A friend of mine here in Nottingham who was a 109 pilot told me that the Hurricane was the best fighter in the war , because one shot him down in the western desert . And also the 109 holding the world air speed record may be untrue , I think the ME 209 held that record. But I would like to say that this video was very good .
German pilots told that Hurricane was difficult to shoot down: bullets flew through its fabric-clad fuselage, and did no bad damage.
The Me 209 bore no resemblance at all to the Me109 and was build purely as a speed racer to capture the speed record. While it held the office speed record during the war, a modified P-47 cracked 500 miles per hour in 1944, making it faster that the Me209.
@@timerover4633 Not sure where you have this from - officially the Me 209 world record of 755 km/h (from 1939) lasted over 30 yers before it was surpassed by a modified Grumman F8F-2 Bearcat (777 km/h in 1969).
@@taunusman3235 I got the data from official Army Air Force tests of the modified P-47. As it was a high altitude, I do not think that it could be viewed as breaking the record, which was set at low altitude.
I remember there was a computer flight simulator at a hobby shop my dad liked to go to when I was a kid. It had MANY aircraft you could fly. I liked the BF109 because it could do things that most of the other planes couldn't.
I've always thought it was a BEAUTIFUL plane.👍
I've also always thought it was a shame that such beautiful aircraft had to destroy each other in war.😔
I agree. The 109 has that rare combination of looking sinister and beautiful all at the same time. I've always been a fan if it's angular lines... the perfect match of form and function.
@@louisavondart9178 Hi, I am planning to kit myself out with a joystick and rudder pedals. My problem is that, as a novice, I am bewildered by the choices available. I was wondering if you could suggest an entry level set up. (and, what's a Trakir?)
Thanks, Les.
War sucks
Wow, so amazingly and totally not interesting
The same g force concept was applied to the rudder pedals so that the feet of the pilots would be angled at the best position to restrict blood loss in crushing high g maneuvers.
From what I can gather Pilots had a lot of faith in the ME109 & biggest issue they had with it was on Landing due to an extremely narrow undercarriage.
yes this and the headrest blocking the pilots view to the rear were major flaws in the design. What also makes me sceptical of this video is how the bf109 is hyped up to be the ultimate dogfithing plane while planes from the uk where much more maneuvarable and similar in speed. i always thought the selling point of the 109 was it's high climb rate and performance in dives
@@Muhbautz Yeah spot on, during the Battle of Britain didn't take long to realise that to loose altitude fast & the ME109 lost a lot of its performance because of its clipped wings & if one is on your tail, cork screw vertically as it could not match the manoeuvrability of the Spit or Hurricane.
@@Wolfsschanze99 it was a formidable aircraft in the right hands, but that could be said about anything. Continued upgrades in power made it competitive with newer Allied aircraft but also negatively affected handling, making it harder to fly.
@@msquaretheoriginal Yeah, putting bigger powerplants in these airframes changed the dynamics, allies also had the same problem so development was a constant, when the US entered the War Germans were shocked at the Power US aircraft could turn on at will, it baffled them until they captured an intact aircraft & found the fuel was a really high octane.
Another fact : the 109, started life and ended its career with a Rolls Royce engine!
Before the inverted V engine was ready, it was tested with a Rolls Royce Kestrel engine.
After the war they were built under licence as the Buchon with Rolls Royce Merlins!
The narrow track of the undercarriage, was so that the planes could be de-rigged, ie take the wings off and put them onto trains for transportation. the undercarriage was not in the wings, but on the fuselage, giving it the ability to be wheeled onto a train, but the downside that it was very tricky to land.
The inverted vee used fuel injection, rather than carbs.
The tail was braced with a gusset.
You are correct about the gear issue up to a point. What made it a handful on landing was the odd "toe in" cant to the main wheels. This came about because Willie Messerschmidt was reluctant to screw up the smooth upper surface of his wing with a couple of bumps that would have been required to accommodate a gear wheel with a straight track. As most airfields of the time were grass it didn't matter all that much because the wheels would just slide on the grass. It proved to be a real challenge on a paved runway with a crosswind and bested even some of its most experienced pilots.
We don’t care for the British engine it was small and relied on 150 octanes to make power it was junk. Db610 made power with 87 and thus had a 30% more power to gain.
The DB 610 was two DB 605's mounted together with a common gear box. It was used in the HE 177 bomber.
Also, it wasn't until the G series that DB 605 was used. The last series to use the DB 605 the K4.
You can thank the criminal British treaty of Versailles for that.
Factoid : By the end of the war minaturisation of technology had progressed to the point within Germany that the component parts necessary for the television camera's used to broadcast the 1936 olympics had been reduced to fit within a shoebox and light enough to be used in, among other things, rockets/missiles as documented in the photos taken during the regimes testing of television guided missiles.
And the Swiss Airforce had some fights with German Fighters, because Switzerland own Me 109 too. The Germans sometimes entered the Swiss airspace.
There was also an incident, later in the war, when the Swiss fought USAAC planes for violating Swiss airspace.
@@tomjustis7237 As if that's not enough, the US deliberately carried out a couple of "punitive" bombing raids against Swiss targets afterwards. Crazy to think of in this day and age, of course, but such was the mentality of a world at war.
the 109 wasn't really designed for turn fighting but for boom and zoom tactics, hence it had one best climb rates during the war
This means, that 109 was a pure interceptor.
@@esajuhanirintamaki965 Well, not exactly. It was a fighter, But turn fighting was coming out of fashion even in WWI.
Even the Red Baron Manfred von Richtofen preferred zooming and booming. French ace Rene Fonck was enthusiastic user of this tactic too. It worked, Fonck got over 70 aerial victories in WWI. Fokker Triplane however was not so fast, but agile and climbed "like monkey".
Albatros biplanes and Fokker DVII suited well for zoom-boom. Sudden surprise was a half victory.
Another nice piece TJ3. Also, Me109 (G, H & K with Hispano and Jumo power) flew in '48 post -war , in Israeli hands.
The video missed an important one! After the war, one Czech factory making BF-109s remained intact. This factory made the batch of 109s that constituted the first fighter squadron of the State of Israel. Yes, the Jewish State's first fighter aircraft were Nazi Bf-109s!
They were procured by Ghislaine Maxwell's father, Robert....
@@Citadin -No kidding!
And first pilots for Israël were former lufftwaffe pilots
Thanks! It was really interesting (althought I know all the things already), you picked the really less known things about the "Messer". How about the P-38, P-39, P-40 and Navy fighters (F2A, F4F, F6F, F4U)?
I seem to remember reading somewhere that at the 1936 olympics that the flight of 109's was actually 108's with a pre production 109 flying the low level passes.
Even the 108 was advanced for its time. For the record, it was a sport/touring aircraft that could carry four passengers. It was used by the Luftwaffe and other air forces as a personnel transport/liaison aircraft.
@@msquaretheoriginal yep it's sweet looking bird, Kermit Weeks is restoring one.
You just keep coming up with things to blow my average screen time budget, don't you? 😁 This was fascinating. I think the Mustang from it's A-36 days through its F-51 final variant would be good.
What I found interesting was the upgrade = new problems issue that plagued the G model. There was a time where whenever I was upgrading something on my PC my wife would comment, "see you tomorrow." She had come to see that each little upgrade to whatever resulted in hours and hours of fixing the multitude of problems that the "quick" upgrade created. Of course the only casualty then was my sleep. I hope Marseille's superior was haunted the rest of his days for forcing that top ace to submit.
Don't omit the Twin Mustang....I saw one in the flesh (all black gloss finish... bad ass looking!) at Reno NV (Stead) in the mid 80's...sadly if memory serves the gear was retracted with engines running , (in Texas I think) and I'm not sure if it was returned to flight....hmmm maybe I'll dig a little
@@Rhino1277HotRails There is a "Twin Mustang" on display at the Air Force Museum at Wright Patterson AFB in Ohio. The concept was (according to the info plaque) that with a greater fuel load and two pilots they could fly longer range missions escorting bombers without fatigue since the pilots could spell each other. And yes, it did look bad ass!
I wonder if cronyizm was not the biggest factor in his death...I mean, German pilots were run into the ground, with no breaks, and command was more afraid of a bad report, than actually losing the war...So I've read.
Marseilles superior can delight in the knowledge that one of the the NAZIS greatest aces was dead
Amen
Another point...the aircraft you use as Yugoslavian ME109 are F or G models. The E or Emil had a truncated cone with the 20mm cannon that fired through the spinner. The F&G introduced the more rounded nose as pictuted. A minor item...but still.
Good vid. FWIW, the name of the country that bought Bf 109s and used them against the Germans when they invaded was *Yugoslavia*, not "Yugoslav".
There is no question that the BF 109 was a magnificent fighter but it should be remembered that it failed to dominate the skies over the UK in 1940 during the Battle of Britain. Although the RAF's Hurricanes and Spitfires were outnumbered 3:1 they outclassed the 109's with eight Mk 2 .303 Brownings versus two Rheinmetall 7.92 mm Borsig MG17s mounted side by side above the engine crankcase and three 20mm Oerlikon MG-FFs two in each wing and one through the airscrew spinner but with only 60 rounds per gun. The Brownings carried 300 rounds per gun which made each four gun battery so effective at close range and although the each Borsig carried 1000 rounds the rate of fire was only 1100 rounds per minute versus the RAF's 1200 with a slightly higher muzzle velocity of 2660 feet per second v the 109's 2450 and although it was supplemented 60 rounds of 20 mm cannon for each of the three Oerlikon it failed to outclass both the Spitfire's superior agility and firepower especially after the carburettor issues were sorted causing the Merlins to 'die' in a dive. It might be argued that the 109's lost up to 30 minutes combat time flying from their French airfields although the 109's service ceiling was an impressive 36,000 feet it's speed was only 357 mph at 12,300 feet versus the Spitfire's maximum speed of 362 mph at 19000 feet.It is also perhaps worth noting that the Spitfire's advanced bubble canopy gave superior visibility. The RAF could rearm and refuel their fighters in 35 minutes which was rather shorter time than the Luftwaffe. To this day it seems strange that such a powerful air force completely failed to secure air superiority over the UK in 1940. Had it continued to attack RAF airfields instead of blitzing
cities the outcome may have been frighteningly different and paved the way for invasion.
The 109s worst enemy was its own high command....
Great video. I'd like to see your review of the British Beaufighter.
Agreed! The "Beau" was one of the unsung heroes of the war!
I’ve met two German aces, Adolph Galland, and my late friend Horst Petzschler. Horst loved the 109.
Let's not forget about the Dornier Do 335 Pfeil (Arrow) or what's considered the best Japanese Fighter of the war, the Nakajima Ki-84 Hayate (Gale)...these would make for some good coffee talk
Better than the "George" fighter, ? Interesting. I saw a Japanese cartoon about the "George", and it's encounter with F6F Hellcats, over Japan....As they were defending the Islands....They had already lost. The video shiwed the 'Last stand, to the last' attidude. sad.
@@peterruiz6117 Yes, the KI-84 was the best fighter that Japan made during the war.
A buddy's father gave me his P-38 photo recon squadron's scrap book that was compiled after the war. It included a good number of loose photographs that were classified Top Secret at the time. One showed a Do 335 assembly facility that was bombed earlier and in the process of being cleaned up. They had pulled around 9 or 10 aircraft in various stages of assembly off into a field with the damaged hangers and cratered tarmac in the background. Some looked nearly completed, including two - 2 seat trainers. Three more trainers lacked props and the rest lacked engines and nose gear. The workers must of been used to seeing low flying recon flights since they looked relaxed peering up at the airplane as it flew by.
My favorite figther plane
very infortavie vid man keep it up almost 90k subs lets goo
The Bf-109 may have been designed by Messerschmitt, but the Messerschmitt company did not exist at the time of the contract. The "Bf" stands for Bayerische Flugzeugwerke, Bavarian Aircraft Works, which was the actual company in the contract competition. Some time after production started, BFW was shut down and the moustache man gave Messerschmitt his own company, as well as responsibility for the Bf-109 and Bf-110, which he had designed. These planes retained the Bf prefix, rather than the Me prefix, because they were already on the books. Aircraft designed after Messerschmitt got his own company did get the Me designation, for example, the infamous Me-262.
Wow. Little known history. Thanks.
It was Erhard Milch who let Willy Messerschmitt have his own company. Milch was the guy who organized the Luftwaffe and Lufthansa. He had a grudge with Messerschmitt and Heinkel too. The 109 and 110 were suppose to be called Me 109 Me 110 after july 1938 on orders from Reich Ministry. But they were called both in official and unofficial records/reports
It would be great to see a video on a great fighter that was never adopted, the F-20 Tigershark.
Beautiful looking stilleto of a fighter that looks great from every angle.
If you want see a precursor of the F20, the T38 trainer is still in use as an adversary at the top gun training center for the US Airforce .
How many of the Luftwaffe Aces became aces in the Spanish Civil war?
That was pretty much a turkey shoot and it's arguable whether or not those should count.
During the beginning of WWII the RAF used the tight 'Vic' formation, or even worse, the 4plane formation that was supposed to solve the fact that the formation leader had no way of realising they were under attack before he saw the flaming wreckage of his wingmen. The wingmen never saw anything because they were too busy trying to keep formation with the leader.
A lot of RAF spitfires were shot down that way before they changed to the loose pair type formation you see in the later years of the war, where the wingman could actually keep a lookout for danger.
So a number of Luftwaffe pilots became aces because the RAF pilots had no time to look around to spot the approaching enemy.
The 'vic' formation may have worked well on earlier generation aircraft since they moved slower and the pilots could actually look around now and then, and spot an equally slow enemy approaching. (The main idea with the formation seems to have been to allow all 3 planes to attack the same larger target since older planes were usually lacking in firepower. When attacking bombers during Battle of Britain, it also worked to a certain extent as the bombers flew in the same formation, for mutual coverage, and it allowed the RAF to bring 3 fighters against 3 bombers at the same time. But it didn't work so well against the escorts... )
The Luftwaffe had abandoned the vic formation('kette') for flying in pairs or as a pair of pairs for their fighters before WWII, so had a tactical advantage.
The Germans called it a rotte.
@@carlpopkins4 The pair of planes, yes. Kette was the old 3 planes formation.
For those who wouild like to know more, here's an OK place to start:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organization_of_the_Luftwaffe_(1933%E2%80%931945)#Schwarm,_Rotte_and_Kette
Presumptuous that some of us don’t know, but still a good synopsis.
Other noteworthy facts about Bf 109:
1) The basis for Bf 109 (role: air dominance fighter) was Bf 108 Taifun (Typhoon). A sport & touring aircraft that his younger krieg "bruder" inherited (A, B, C, D & E variants) some geometry from: overall wing profile, rear fuselage and tail section.
2) The prototype was powered by British supplied engine: Rolls-Royce Kestrel (supercharged 60˙ V-12, 21L/1,300 in³, 700 b.h.p./520KW)
3) The fighter would have his trial by fire in Spanish civil war (B, C & D) by Legion Condor of which Werner Mölders was not only a member, but an ace by the time the war ended.
4) Until E version was introduced, Bf 109 was powered by Junkers Jumo 210D engine, driving 2-bladed fixed pitch propeller.
5) Germany sold Bf 109E-3 to Yugoslavia with expectation of being their ally before & during operation Barbarossa (Unternehmen Barbarossa).
6) While German fighter pilots were being somewhat sceptical about the concept of the new fighter, with the introduction of an radical F variant, Luftwaffe pilots were gobsmacked by it's performance (speed & handling), albeit at the cost of some of it's firepower.
7) Messerschmitt AG was officially established in 1938 by reforming Bayerische Flugzeugwerke and adopting the name of Bf 109's lead designer: Wilhelm Emil "Willy" Messerschmitt.
8) Being that this aircraft was designed & produced (among other companies involved in it's manufacture) by Messerschmitt AG, now you know why the official designation was Bf (Bayerische Flugzeugwerke) rather then Me was adopted ;)
We clearly could benefit from more peasants!
the only thing you got right is the number 108 is just before 109. the typhoon story is,excuse me, pure Bullshit.please do not write comments without having any clue.please please.
Gerhard Barkhorn told that F-version was the best, it was fast and agile. "You could do anything with Friedrich!" Gustav was fast due to the engine output, but clumsier than Friedrich. Gustavs weaponry with 13 mm MG:s and 20 mm cannon was good.
@@esajuhanirintamaki965 Absolutely. Aber, Emil variant had two MG (2x13mm MG 131) & two cannons. Starting with Friedrich, one cannon was omitted and this armament (one Motokanone - centerline trough prop shaft 20mm MG 151/20 or 30mm 108 Kanone & 2x 13mm MG 131) was kept for all variants till the end of the war. This was remedied somewhat by installing 2x20mm MG 151/20 as underwing gunpods. However, these gunpods did had negative effective on handling (all fighters of both sides, equipped like this were affected - negatively). This was an "upgrade" for Zerstörer missions (bomber destroyer). Naturally, pilots would rather omit this extra firepower, because enemy bombers had a fighter escort and against fighters, they were handicapped in dogfight.
@@JustPeasant But Bf109 E-1 had four MG17 (7,9 mm) machine-guns two in the nose and two in wings. E-3 had two MG17 under upper nose cowlings, one MG FF (20 mm) shooting through propeller shaft and two MG FF in the wings.
E-4 had no MG:s and had three MG FF (officially), as had the E-7. But it must be remembered that in Luftwaffe field shops many earlier versions were upgraded to compare later versions. It could be seen E-3/4 version with factory plate, in which reads E-1 and it is possible to see in photos version E-4, which had same weaponry as in E-3.
Upgrading was made for instance to E-1:s to make them similar as E-3. It can be seen old cockpit canopies and newer canopies in same fighter Staffel (squadron) and 109:s readiness lists still mention E-3s.
Wing cannons: Finnish pilots preferred removing these cannons. Cannons were no doubt effective to the Soviet Ilyushin Il-2 Stormoviks, but with skill was possibe to shoot this brute down. Hits to the Il-2s oil cooler were enough.
Great historical perspective. You earned a new subscriber!
If the 109 was so great, why did Adolph Galland reportedly tell Goering that he wanted Spitfires!!!
Yes! Probably because he didn't know about the fact the spitfires were very fragile.
As great as a pilot as Galland was, I think there were a few things that he was incorrect about.
What I was surprised of first finding out the hurricane shot down more german aircraft in the battle for Britain than the spitfire. Copy and paste now. Two superb fighters would bear the brunt of the coming battle. The Hawker Hurricane was regarded as Fighter Command’s “workhorse.” It was teamed with a “thoroughbred,” the Supermarine Spitfire. In July 1940, the RAF had 29 squadrons of Hurricanes and 19 squadrons of Spitfires. The Spitfire was one of the greatest fighters of all time. It had been introduced in 1936 but was still around to shoot down a German jet aircraft Me 262 in 1944. It became the symbol of the Battle of Britain. The Hurricane was larger and slower, but like the Spitfire, it could turn inside the Bf 109. More than half of the German aircraft destroyed were shot down by Hurricanes. Whenever possible, the RAF had sent Spitfires to fight the Bf 109s and used Hurricanes against German bombers-but the Hurricanes had downed their share of fighters, too.
Hartmann, Rall and others flew various versions for the duration....even led FWs which I find interesting
G wasn't available yet....we could probably sit over quite a few beverages and argue the comparative merits/weaknesses and remain steadfast in our beliefs....Cheers
Yugoslav: Adjective
Yugoslavia: Country.
Yugoslavian: Citizen of Yugoslavia. Also, more generically, a South Slav.
There was a BF109 version called the 'D' version that used a TWO Bladed Propeller Instead of the more customary Three Bladed.
I recently saw a GORGEOUS example of a 1/32nd scale BF109-D model, and I was SO intrigued by it that now I plan to do a "Sister Plane" to the one I saw on a modeling forum.
All the Jumo-engined 109 variants used two-blade propellers. This includes variants introduced earlier than the D.
Mein Highschool-Deutschlehrer flog die 109 und wurde in England abgeschossen und gefangen genommen. Herr Paul Hendricks fliegt jetzt mit der Walküre
👍great videos, how about the next one the B-25 Mitchell and B-26
Though I didn't know the Yugoslav air force had BF-109's; they used the wrong insignia in their animation. The correct one is red, white, blue, roundel with a white cross over the top of it. The one used in the animation is the postwar Communist red star over the roundel not the white cross.
Cover the FW 190 please! Also, what Modifications were made to the 192 perform to perform better at lower altitudes?
Good one. Many variants.
During the war the allies made major leap forward in aviation fuel technology. Catalytic alkylation and isomerization contributed to the development of high-performance aircraft by providing blending components for the formulation of high-octane aviation fuel. During World War II, Allied aircraft burning 100-octane fuel had a significant speed advantage over German aircraft that used 87-octane fuel. This advantage was a critical factor in the 1940 Battle of Britain. Much higher engine compression ratios could be used resulting in a huge gain in performance and also, because the density of the fuel was higher there was more mpg.
2 points.
The Yugoslav 109's depicted were all Gustavs and not Emil's.
The Africa campaign 109 was a Friedrich, not a Gustav.
They did end up sending the Gustav's to Africa.
@@notsureyou I believe so but it was Marseille who was flying an F, he much preferred the E variant I believe
@@SweetSniper5197 Marseille preferred the "F", but was forced to fly the "G"
The Africa Campaign 109 shown here is a G Variant, you can tell by the two Spark Plug Air Scoops above the exhaust stacks.
@@taumelscheibe5948 I never knew the Gustav had a retractable tail wheel. I was of the belief that it only ever had a fixed tail wheel?
Edit- a quick read up shows that the early Gustavs did retain the retractable tail wheel, coupled with no main gear wing bulge and the spark scoop, yeah it is a Gustav.
My bad. Carry on!
I would think a lot of casual fans of history don't know that the bf-109 had an inverted ( upside down) engine. I thought for sure that would be mentioned.
When it comes to the number of aircraft shot down the BF-109 has two big advantages. It saw more combat years then any of its counterparts having served in the Spanish Civil War. And it was pitched against more airforces with inferior and obsolete aircraft than its counterparts. It was undeniably a great aircraft though.
Too true. A huge number of those were against the Soviets in the first year of fighting on the Eastern Front. The VVS lost upwards of 70% of their aircraft in 1941, (most of the on the ground.) In the first few days of Operation Barbarossa, Soviet losses totaled over 2000 aircraft destroyed in the air and on the ground.
It was an incredibly rich target environment for the Luftwaffe. The skies were filled with obsolete aircraft, flown by poorly trained inexperienced pilots. They were easy targets.
Another factor often ignored was the sheer number of Bf 109s produced. It was the most produced fighter of the war, with about 34,000 made. That's 50% more than the next most produced fighter, the Spitfire, at close to 23,000.
It is not Germany's problem if countries with inferior military men and matériel choose to oppose her in battle!
@@shahrookhshroff3018 Never said it was. Just adding a plausible explanation that the BF-109 had more kills than any other aircraft. It was in service longer, there more of them and they faced a lot of inferior opponents (both obsolete aircraft and unskilled pilots)
@@shahrookhshroff3018 They were forced to oppose and most were caught on the ground. It is not like they attacked Germany. It is kid of funny that Germany lost two World Wars to the inferior opposition.
@@markgranger9150 Soviet apathy and incompetence ensured that the V - VS WAS "caught on the ground" on the FIRST DAY of the War ... and on several occasions thereafter.
It also ensured that the V - VS foolishly kept on launching air raids on Luftwaffe air bases which were often within "binocular - observable distance" from their own, only to face more swift and serious RECIPROCATIONS from the Luftwaffe.
But enjoying OVERWHELMING QUANTITATIVE ADVANTAGES OVER ONE'S OPPONENTS is another advantageous aspect of war. This was the war - winning advantage possessed by the Allies, which they enforced with the most bestial brutality!
That last piece of trivia seemed very suspicious. The moment he’s ordered to upgrade, his plane blows up
Small capacity fuel tank. During the Battle of Britain, the ME 109 pilots could only stay 10 to 15 minutes in combat over Britain before they were low on fuel, and had to return to France.
"Small"? And what exactly are you comparing it to? During the Battle of Britain, Me-109 had higher range than any of the single-engine British fighters, including Spitfire and Hurricane. You're not comparing its range to multi-engine bombers, aren't you?
@Ranulf 84 if you did not notice, I was responding to the "Small capacity fuel tank" statement, which is absolutely not true as 109 had a very good range among the single-engine fighters of BoB, and its fuel tank was definitely not small for its class. What part of this do you not agree with?
@@sergeychmelev5270 no, the German fighters. It's a known fact that when the Me 109s crossed the Enlish Channel, the pilots had to look constantly at their fuel indicator, waiting for the red warning light to start flashing before they had timeto turn back to France. They had 20 minutes max to make it.
@@sergeychmelev5270 You. It was small to save weight, a major flaw in it's design.
@@82luft49 name me a single-engine fighter plane from the Battle of Britain era that had a considerably larger fuel tank than 109. There are none. Therefore, it’s not a design flaw.
I have been into ww2 flight sims for 10 tears, and still this video surprised me.
Most of what they shot down were outdated Russian aircraft. The Spitfire's had a stronger airframe whereas in a ,500mph dive with a spit the German pilots knew there was a danger of losing their wings.
@Derrick Bridges Spitfires shot down almost every type of German Fighter (excluding the crap Me163). Including two of the overhyped, Luftfanboy Ta152s.
The Spitties lost their wings quicker when at high G especially going from negative to positive or the other way around. The problem of the 109 at high speed was that it could not pull due to the immese forces on the elevator. But you could still use the trim if you wheren't allready too low. The FW-190 didn't have that problem anymore.
@@WanderfalkeAT "Lost their wings" Of course, more bullshit postng...Perhaps you have evidence?
Reclined seating to bear more Gs isn't a joke. The F-16 does the exact same thing.
I'd heard that the performance of produced 109 fell drastically from the loss of cottage industry that made the wood composite fuselage, wings etc. They weren't the target but collateral damage from American bombers dropping bombs over the German countryside. Wiped out the skilled laborers and tools.
The 109 didn't use wood composites, and the Germans found ways to keep production going, moving into underground mines and other bombproof facilities. The problem was that they were running out of qualified pilots to fly them.
@@msquaretheoriginal really? They didn't use veneered wood that was coated? They weren't making them out of aluminum. I doubt they used steel because of the weight 🤔
I don't think they used fabric as they did in WW I ..but maybe they did 😕
Which leaves wood.. which was very thin veneered wood layered to create a wood composite like modern carbon fiber or kevlar/spectra.
@@davidkamaunu7887 one of the most advanced features of the 109 when it made its debut was its all-metal construction. Aluminum was plentiful in continental Europe, and the Germans were able to draw much of it from their allies and occupied territories.
@@msquaretheoriginal They tried to get Aluminium from Norway... They even sent 1000 slave laborers expressly for the purpose of expanding production facilities from 37.000 Tons to 149.000Tons/year, but luckily, allied bombers flattened the facilities using 1500 bombs in 1943, before production could start. It had also been delayed because the need to build hydro power plants, and you needed a permission from 'NVE'(Norges Vassdrag og Energivesen, /Norwegian Water and Energy resources department) and that took time. Gøring wanted to ignore that but Terboven insisted that it was better to do it by the book, to foster cooperation with the public.
German fighter production was higher at the end of the war than the beginning.
Some German pilots said that the ME109 had a lot of blind spots around the canopy, that's why they had to move around to get a clear shot of allied aircraft.
I thought it was 5 things you didn't know about me
My disappointment is immeasurable my day is ruined
Lol
Oh no, I think I saw a swaztika on one of the old films, i need a safe space. The mutilation of a plane's accurate historical markings is insane,
The main reason for 109 victories over spitfires in the battle of britain was the ability to fly negativ g's thanks to the fuel injection, while the RR-engines at this time had carburators causing loss of power at -g's.
But didn't the Germans suffer higher losses than the Brits in that battle?
@@rcnelson hm, it's more or less equal on the side of plane losses. the battle of britain was given up on the german side due to them not being able to sustain the losses of planes and pilots. Apart from that, yes most ppl agree that the spitfire is a supirior fighter and the engine was also replaced with a fule injection system in later models so the diving away trick did not work for long against britain.
@@rcnelson Britian out produced Germany more or less... They had more Spitfires and Hurricanes by the end of the BoB than before it started.
Germany couldn't handle the losses the same way and weren't being supported by American fighters and pilots like Britian.
They also needed to carry more fuel than England who weren't taking off and travelling acrosss the English channel.
The Attack fairly successful in the numbers of English planes shot down, but it completely failed in taking out Britain's RAF.
That Battle was much less significant than people give it credit for... A massive majority of Germany's war effort was exhausted against Russia on the Eastern front, not the WestFront
I don't think the 109 was inferior... The model used to travel across the English channel (109E3 mainly) perhaps wasn't the best example... But when it was England in Europe and Germany not having to travel across the Channel, the Germans switched over to the 109F models and maintained 2 kills to every loss... Bu the time the Fw190 came out, England had no hope of making a superior plane... The spitfires after ww2 are better... and The later Merlin Mk9 spitfires were as good as a 109F/G again... But it was really putting that engine into other planes like the P40F or the P51D mustangs that made a big difference (that and sheer numbers).
The 109 remained an effective Jager until the end of the war mostly due to good cannons and a great Engine in the DB605's... The spitfire had a better airframe overall (not so much for climbing but for a good climbrate while maintaining a good turn rate) and when Germany put the Daimler Benz into the spitfire frame, they made a plane that was faster and better at climbing than both the spitfires and the Bf109s, essentially showing the spitfire had the better airframe but a worse engine, and Bf109 had the better engine but a worse platform.
I personally prefer the flight characteristics of the Bf109 and reliability of the Bf109s engine over the smooth feeling of the spitfire, mainly due to better energy retention and the better ability to swoop in vertical manovours.
If it were a 10 must scoring system, then id give the Bf109 a 10 and the Spitfire a 9... But other pilots may feel it goes the other way depending on the sim and their characteristics as a pilot
@@rcnelson From 13th August to 6th September the Luftwaffe; mainly attacking airfields in the South East of England, lost 629 aircraft while the RAF lost 385.
From a neutral POV...the same way the Flying Tigers pilots got combat experience in China ahead of USA officially entering WW2, the Luftwaffe pilots got theirs in the Spanish Civil War...alas goose sauce ain gander sauce ...
No doubt the Bf109 and the Spitfire were the world's top two fighters just prior to WW2 but there are two other little known facts from that time. The first is that until the 109 got its Daimler-Benz engine the Hurricane outperformed it, outgunned it and out handled it - after the 109D the Hurricane could only out turn it. More remarkably is that Heinkel made the He113/"100" which, after some changes could do 416mph and climb at 3,287ft.min BEFORE the war began but the RLM (or just Milch, pretty much same thing!) said "no, your job is to make bombers". That attitude continued when the Me262 was made despite Heinkel again making a higher performance rival, the He280 that did 578mph and climbed at 4,923ft.min. Milch later stopped Heinkel from making the deadly "Mosquito killer" He219 leading to one Luftwaffe maintenance unit building six from spares and hiding them from the RLM! Thanks for the help Milch!
(by the way, the prototype Bf109 flew with a Rolls-Royce Kestrel!)
messerschmitt had some good connections. everything heinkel did was more than competetive enough to compete with everything messerschmitt did. only Focke Wulf brought some new on the table that messerschmitt could not compete with.
the BF109 was a racing horse, the fw190 was a warhorse
The He-113 was a made-up plane using photos of He-100s, which didn't enter service because their large in-wing cooling systems meant that a even single hit on the wing would result in the engine overheating and eventually bringing down the aircraft
Hahaha! I knew you got the images from WarThunder! I always fly the Bf 109s. Love them! They beat even the Spitfires in dogfights.
It was Jugoslavia not Yugoslav, and they were Royalist not communist and had no red star on their colours, one of my great uncles served with the Royal Jugoslavian Air Force in ww2, before bein shot down and fighting on the ground for a time as a Chetnik, then escaping to Egypt and then UK, to fight again.
Dear Rob, greatings from Your and mine Serbia, Za Kralja i Otadžbinu, maybe you could wright something abouth your grandfathers life?
@@theslobokost Sadly that is all that i know, he is only related to me because he married an aunt who is English. More Royalist Jugoslavs were his colleagues who came to UK in 1948, and another married another aunt, i know he was a Petty Officer in the Royal Jugoslav Navy, blown off his vessel when the Germans attacked , escaped, captured, tortured and escaped again to join the Chetniks. He had been tortured by beating the bottom of his feet, so escape must have been hard. He recovered and fought on land then escaped via Trieste and to Germany to work in the Volkswagen plant after the British made him a DP Displaced Person in 1945 then allowed him to come to UK. He worked hard all his life, on a farm in East Anglia, then became a chauffeur to the Spencer family (related to Princess Diana), later mostly in the Health Service, then died from diabetes aged 80. Most of his colleagues also are now dead. They were very brave, supremely strong physically ,loyal, hard working men who never gave up their allegiance to Jugoslavia and to the King. As an Englishman who knows the true history of ww2 in Jugoslavia i was privileged and honoured to know such men as a I grew up. I do know that he was at Ravna Gora with General Mihailovic. He showed me his cap badge which had M and II signifying Mihailovic and II for King Petar II. I know very little of the one who flew for the RJAF except that he did fly with the British RAF and later as a commercial pilot. He was a very good pilot, and taught me to fly. I think they found the war hard to speak of, and sometimes they would meet and share drinks and play cards, and talk a little but always you would see tears in their eyes when they spoke of home, it was hard and very touching to see. The world has been cruel to Jugoslavia and Serbia, who have always been good allies and friends to the UK, who have not always been fair in return, sadly. May God bless you, stay safe, all the best from UK.
@@robshirewood5060 I apologize for my late reply, many thanks for Yours, my grandfather ended his war in german stalag, also a very exciting story, but not as near as Yours. Under this bloody red star like in this video we were unable for decades to comprehend what our real heroes did for Serbia, your story is adequate for some god movie. If You ever come to Serbia, send me a message thry this Channel to be my guest. All the best.
@@theslobokost No need to apologise, but thank you for the courtesy. My extended family on the Serbian side still live in eastern Serbia. Thanks for the offer of hospitality, if i ever get the chance i will contact, it reminds me of the typical hospitality of Serbian people here in UK who always welcomed me, and of the golden hearted Serbs who in ww2 gave of their poor food supplies to British POW's on trains from Greece going to Germany at great cost to themselves. God bless and all the best to you ,stay safe
I'd enjoy a video comparing and contrasting the F4F-3 Wildcat to the heavier F4F-4 model.
The bf109 used 87 octanes and if it used 150 octanes that the allies used it be 30% faster because of the high wing loading! Wings were very narrow vs something like a big fat spitfire
I read something about aircraft canopies that I didn’t know and surprised me greatly. It was in the book Spitfire by John Nichol which contains several first-hand accounts by Spitfire pilots during the Battle of Britain who state that they would slide back the canopy just before entering combat to improve visibility. So they would actually fight with the canopy open. Note this could be done on the Spitfire because the canopy slid back but not on the BF-109 where the canopy was hinged to the side. Not sure how far this practice extended into WWII, you have to remember that the Battle of Britain was early in the war and not much earlier the RAF would have been using open cockpit biplanes. Also many of the young pilots in the Battle Britain had less than 20 hours flying experience and had possibly flown more in open canopy trainers than in closed canopy aircraft - so more used to open canopy.
The problem here is that a open cockpit at high speeds tend to get the canopy ripped off and also it would shake like crazy on the joints. Also it would be freaking loud and windy inside. They however did fly slow with open cockpit sometimes but not in fights except they forgot or had no time to close it before engagement. It is known that USN fighters had their canopies open on landing and take off but that was a safety thing, because it was quite a problem to open the canopy when under water. Also the canopy frames where much more durable. You can see that especcially in the F-4U Corsair even in the Korea Conflict.
@@WanderfalkeAT I’m not suggesting that is what Spitfire pilots should have done, I’m saying what actual real Spitfire pilots said they did do. Obviously couldn’t do that on a BF-109 as the canopy hinges to the side whereas it slides back on the Spitfire.
The spitfire had a fuel tank in front of the pilot and would cause pilots to be burned severely. It is hard to open any cockpit when your hands are burnt.
Some pilots never fired their guns and some had less than 20 hours flying high performance planes.
Early. Nice vid :)
Thanks!
I use to build this model plane as a child in 1972. Paint it, put its decals!! Good review! I just subscribed today, July 12, 2022. Greetings from Hollywood California.
The one thing that was problematic for 109 pilots (particularly for the young or inexperienced) was the A-frame landing gear which was directly under the fuselage…on an unpaved airstrip a rut or upturn peat and it’s ass over tits,which made landings and takeoffs pretty interesting,even sometimes for experienced pilots….
Yes. I heard somewhere that one out of three pilots killed in the 109 were killed in landing or takeoff. What made it worse was the 'lunchbox' hinged canopy. This meant that it could not be open in flight, takeoff or landing. If the plane flipped on the ground the pilot was trapped inside and often burned to death in his plane.
@@edwardcnnell2853 experienced 109 pilots would (if they weren’t wounded or the canopy release latch wasn’t damaged)try to put the nose up get enough altitude to invert the aircraft and simply fall out,there was also an blank explosive charge that the pilot could pull that would jettisoned the canopy (sometimes this didn’t always work) but there are trade offs with practically any combat aircraft and the 109 had its share…
@@edwardcnnell2853 I guess that's why they nicknamed it the 'Coffin lid'
Another interesting 109 fact. It was the first fighter aircraft flown by the Israeli Air Force when Israel became a nation since so many had been built. It also saw action in 1948 in the first Arab-Israeli war.
The Israelis nick named it the , " Mule ".
The Czech 109s were procured to Israel by a young Israeli spy, Robert Maxwell, whose daughter Ghislaine run the infamous underage sex trafficking/blackmail ring with Jeffrey Epstein...
It wasn't superior to the Supermarine Spitfire. Equal at best during the battle of Britian. And then surpassed as Spitfire variants got better. (Fuel injection and cannons helped)
It wasnt superior primarily due to lower octane fuel the Germans were forced to use, resulting in a bigger, heavier engine to get the same HP
@@freightdogfreddy and then in 1943 the Griffon (not griffin) engined Spitfires arrived! Nothing the Germans had at that time could catch them in level flight, or a climb, and they were armed with 20mm cannons and .5 machine guns. The 109s weren’t fast enough or powerful enough.
It was only later on the German Jets and Rocket propelled aircraft equaled or surpassed them, but there were far fewer of them.
@@donyoung1384 hehe, wrong.
@@jnik_3234 you can’t just say I’m wrong, you have to at least justify your statement. Or everyone will just shrug and laugh at you!😊😂🤣
You’re right… I never knew any of these things. Great finds.
A dark time but nonetheless great history here and very well executed thank you.
Dark time is still here. Patton was right. We fought the wrong enemy
Messerschmidt wasnt a company at the time when the German Luftwaffe looked for a new Airplane. Thats also the reason why it is called BF (Bayrische Flugwerke). That company later became Messerschmidt (1938)
I must say my experience in the 109 in simulators leads me to say its Visibility is awful compared to any of its peers.
why would you think anyone cares that "your experience" and "in simulators" is of any interest to anyone? Good lord....
I like the informative information on the Messerschmitt I wish you would have liberated on the kind of firepower the plane carried during their actual engagement's against the other planes.