It was Plank's description of blackbody radiation in terms of the quantization of light that started quantum thinking. The concept of energy was well defined long before quantum mechanics. Both the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formalism of classical physics deal with it, and they were originally derived directly from Newton's laws and calculus.
thats because the interaction of the electron or photon or w/e u use, creates a quantum entangelment with the observation device. so the interaction of the electron with the matter that makes up the detector forces the wave funtion to collapse and the particle to have a position.
"please no machine is going to solve that question." that's what they said about the hubble telescope and we learned tons with it and it is still useful. I hope you get a chance to eat your words after we learn a bunch of new stuff
Can someone explain how we know the mass of the Top quark is 170GeV yet we can't tell if the Higgs boson mass is greater than 115GeV until we collide particles at energies that have not yet been achieved? In other words: by that logic, wouldn't we still be searching for the Top quark too?
at least I do understand what I,m hearing here , Gravity is the force caused by the Movement of Objects in an area of a space . collisions in LHC are particles of matter and at the LHC we can View These and Study Them :) QC
I know what I said is correct because the Standard model discussed in this video is correct. The standard model is a theory based entirely upon the fact that the speed of light cannot be surpassed. It has been shown by observation and measurement by thousands of physicists that the speed of light is the maximum speed that mass and energy can travel. Mr. Tesla was not a physicist and did not have the analytical tools to really understand that what he was claiming was wrong.
sure, but what about atom and particle study the quantum side? People were eating/drinking radioactive uranium products and elixirs to heal their ills back then. True physics as a field of science did not come around until the 1940s I believe. In fact it was special relativity that brought it on if I remember correctly.
museken: Physics is the science of nature, it can't get any more real life than that. Newtonian physics is the basis for all types of engineering, that would include civil engineering. Quantum physics is the basis for chemistry which is the basis for the petro-industry e.g. fuel, medicine; and bio-chemistry e.g. crop enhancement, insuline, the h1n1 vaccine that is currently being worked on. Also physicists will develop the power source of our future.
not sure, but I don't think the field of physics even existed back at the turn of the last century when Edison and Tesla were alive. quote from this vid regarding particle-weight-decays into lighter particles. "...count the number at it's always three" Tesla was obsessed with the number three.
The standard model has been verified to better that 1 part in 1,000,000,000,000 in some cases. Thousands of experiments have been performed and they all agree to that accuracy. We know that the Standard model is incomplete in some regards. It can't be totally thrown out though. It can be improved upon, but not discarded. The standard model does not include general relativity which it must do when you consider what happens at extremely high energy conditions like at the big bang.
that's all great but was the field of physics defined back then? I think that's where this conversation started. I don't believe the field named "physics" was established until the early 1940s. Honestly I'm no expert in the history of sciences, but I remember hearing that in a classroom eons ago. Yes it was a physics class and yes the class was underway at the time I heard it. )
My reason for the big bang is hundreds of thousands of billions of particals floating around in the fast void of space slowly moved closer each milenium and when they got a couple coliding with each other they created a magnetic field..more meleniums later They come closer to those particles closer and closer faster and faster and faster untill they all come to form a little ball of particles so condence with Trillions and trillions of them And then when the force became so great they exploded
I would suggest that you examine physics texts to see if you can find anywhere the name Tesla mentioned in regard to a valid physical theory. Biographies are certainly no judge of any real science done by Tesla. I have always admired Tesla for what he did accomplish, nonetheless he did not use or understand the mathematical tools available at the time, and his work was on applications. Perhaps he was an early example of an engineer. To say that he is a "leading scientist" is absurd.
well I'm no Webster but physics is the study of matter and energy and their relationship to each other the, study of the very small parts of matter and how the effect and are effected by the environment they're in. Atoms were only found in the mid/early 1800s I think with the invention of the microscope. Physics before the 20th century was defined as a study of natural laws or natural philosophy If remember my history correctly. It was the theory of relativity that started quantum thinking.
This assertion by you and or Mr. Tesla is absolutely wrong! The only "thing" that can travel faster than light are quantum entanglements like those shown in the now famous Aspect experiment. If energy could "travel" faster than light, then the Standard model would be absolutely incorrect. During the era before the big bang (called the inflationary era), spacetime did expand faster than light speed, but energy still not exceed light speed.
@TeleporterM11 The collisions that take place in the LHC are much less energetic than ones that happen in the atmosphere all the time from cosmic rays. They've been taking place for billions of years. By the way, you're completely incoherent, maybe you should think about why it is you believe these things and if you really are being honest with yourself.
@TeleporterM11 The collisions that take place in the LHC are much less energetic than ones that happen in the atmosphere all the time from cosmic rays. They've been taking place for billions of years. I think you might have a problem with your mind. You're completely incoherent. Maybe you should go talk to someone or something.
Possessing patents certainly does not qualify one to be a physicist. Edison was certainly not a physicist. Tesla did not have adequate schooling in the mathematics or the physics of the time to understand in depth what he was fooling with. He relied on intuition primarily. He was more of a tinker/inventor type. Nothing wrong with that, but he was no physicist. That is certain. There are no accepted theories in any branch of science that he was responsible for. He was a gadget guy.
First couple seasons really suck, it doesnt get good until Davies leaves. his episodes missed more than they hit, and never created that interesting of monsters. moffat created the vashda narada, weeping angels, "are you my mummy?" also rose is annoying and turned the Doc into an immortal pedo.(like edward cullen)
That was really enjoyable. The speaker made this very complex subject very clear in a way that only a true expert can.
It was Plank's description of blackbody radiation in terms of the quantization of light that started quantum thinking. The concept of energy was well defined long before quantum mechanics. Both the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formalism of classical physics deal with it, and they were originally derived directly from Newton's laws and calculus.
Thanx for the upload, this shines light on lot of my questions about the subject
thats because the interaction of the electron or photon or w/e u use, creates a quantum entangelment with the observation device. so the interaction of the electron with the matter that makes up the detector forces the wave funtion to collapse and the particle to have a position.
I have no idea what this man is talking about, but in a sense it amazes me to know about these things.
@ 16:00
Wonder what website they're browsing over on the bottom left.
3:56 the guy sitting in the front is already lost and spacing out. haha I wonder how many people are actually seriously listening to him there.
"please no machine is going to solve that question."
that's what they said about the hubble telescope and we learned tons with it and it is still useful. I hope you get a chance to eat your words after we learn a bunch of new stuff
Can someone explain how we know the mass of the Top quark is 170GeV yet we can't tell if the Higgs boson mass is greater than 115GeV until we collide particles at energies that have not yet been achieved? In other words: by that logic, wouldn't we still be searching for the Top quark too?
I meant to say classic physics rather than newtonian.
great talk!
amazing shine to that head though, if you;ve noticed.
at least I do understand what I,m hearing here , Gravity is the force caused by the Movement of Objects in an area of a space . collisions in LHC are particles of matter and at the LHC we can View These and Study Them :) QC
I know what I said is correct because the Standard model discussed in this video is correct. The standard model is a theory based entirely upon the fact that the speed of light cannot be surpassed. It has been shown by observation and measurement by thousands of physicists that the speed of light is the maximum speed that mass and energy can travel.
Mr. Tesla was not a physicist and did not have the analytical tools to really understand that what he was claiming was wrong.
Ignore gravity at the sub atomic level? What is the strong nuclear force and gravitation one in the same force? This would explain why it's so weak.
sure, but what about atom and particle study the quantum side? People were eating/drinking radioactive uranium products and elixirs to heal their ills back then.
True physics as a field of science did not come around until the 1940s I believe. In fact it was special relativity that brought it on if I remember correctly.
museken: Physics is the science of nature, it can't get any more real life than that. Newtonian physics is the basis for all types of engineering, that would include civil engineering. Quantum physics is the basis for chemistry which is the basis for the petro-industry e.g. fuel, medicine; and bio-chemistry e.g. crop enhancement, insuline, the h1n1 vaccine that is currently being worked on. Also physicists will develop the power source of our future.
not sure, but I don't think the field of physics even existed back at the turn of the last century when Edison and Tesla were alive.
quote from this vid regarding particle-weight-decays into lighter particles.
"...count the number at it's always three" Tesla was obsessed with the number three.
Excellent.
The standard model has been verified to better that 1 part in 1,000,000,000,000 in some cases. Thousands of experiments have been performed and they all agree to that accuracy. We know that the Standard model is incomplete in some regards. It can't be totally thrown out though. It can be improved upon, but not discarded. The standard model does not include general relativity which it must do when you consider what happens at extremely high energy conditions like at the big bang.
@yaerav: I bet you're refering to the graviton! ;-)
How did you do on the bet? ;)
that's all great but was the field of physics defined back then? I think that's where this conversation started. I don't believe the field named "physics" was established until the early 1940s. Honestly I'm no expert in the history of sciences, but I remember hearing that in a classroom eons ago. Yes it was a physics class and yes the class was underway at the time I heard it. )
My reason for the big bang is hundreds of thousands of billions of particals floating around in the fast void of space slowly moved closer each milenium and when they got a couple coliding with each other they created a magnetic field..more meleniums later They come closer to those particles closer and closer faster and faster and faster untill they all come to form a little ball of particles so condence with Trillions and trillions of them And then when the force became so great they exploded
@socrstreets:ghost photons Indeed!
I would suggest that you examine physics texts to see if you can find anywhere the name Tesla mentioned in regard to a valid physical theory.
Biographies are certainly no judge of any real science done by Tesla. I have always admired Tesla for what he did accomplish, nonetheless he did not use or understand the mathematical tools available at the time, and his work was on applications. Perhaps he was an early example of an engineer. To say that he is a "leading scientist" is absurd.
anyone from 2018, no? wow
the LHC has a possibility of creating new parallel dimension !
awesome talk
where's that accent from?
Brooklyn, NY
@InHouseTrainingLol If that is the case, then the real question should be : Where all those hundreds of thousands of billions of particals came from?
Creating the big bang
well I'm no Webster but physics is the study of matter and energy and their relationship to each other the, study of the very small parts of matter and how the effect and are effected by the environment they're in. Atoms were only found in the mid/early 1800s I think with the invention of the microscope.
Physics before the 20th century was defined as a study of natural laws or natural philosophy If remember my history correctly.
It was the theory of relativity that started quantum thinking.
OK, I asked too soon. He answers this question near the end of the lecture. Sorry!
verycleanteeth
He's playing Frogger.
u observe then not observe like in the double-slt experiment
what are you going on about?
This assertion by you and or Mr. Tesla is absolutely wrong! The only "thing" that can travel faster than light are quantum entanglements like those shown in the now famous Aspect experiment. If energy could "travel" faster than light, then the Standard model would be absolutely incorrect. During the era before the big bang (called the inflationary era), spacetime did expand faster than light speed, but energy still not exceed light speed.
THE MYST-MONSTERS ARE ON THE WAY-101-11
Uhh... The theories of electromagnetism were founded by the time Thomas and Nikola were doing their work.
Because The Physicists has a theory that They think of enough amount .
DID THEY PAY HIM FOR THIS CLASS OR WAS IT DETENTION, SOME SORT OF MENTAL TORTURE.
How's that Internet working out for you?
No money of mine is going to that excuse, let time decide our understanding, please no machine is going to solve that question.
I wish I could become a Nuclear or Quantum physicist but I'm not smart enough for that :(
It's "they're" not "their".
Why Physicists Need the Large Hardon Collider God damnit dyslexia...
@TeleporterM11 The collisions that take place in the LHC are much less energetic than ones that happen in the atmosphere all the time from cosmic rays. They've been taking place for billions of years. By the way, you're completely incoherent, maybe you should think about why it is you believe these things and if you really are being honest with yourself.
Define "true physics."
@TeleporterM11 The collisions that take place in the LHC are much less energetic than ones that happen in the atmosphere all the time from cosmic rays. They've been taking place for billions of years. I think you might have a problem with your mind. You're completely incoherent. Maybe you should go talk to someone or something.
Possessing patents certainly does not qualify one to be a physicist. Edison was certainly not a physicist. Tesla did not have adequate schooling in the mathematics or the physics of the time to understand in depth what he was fooling with. He relied on intuition primarily. He was more of a tinker/inventor type. Nothing wrong with that, but he was no physicist. That is certain. There are no accepted theories in any branch of science that he was responsible for. He was a gadget guy.
nice try sassy pants
First couple seasons really suck, it doesnt get good until Davies leaves. his episodes missed more than they hit, and never created that interesting of monsters. moffat created the vashda narada, weeping angels, "are you my mummy?" also rose is annoying and turned the Doc into an immortal pedo.(like edward cullen)
tl;dnl
@mdma24
Dont sell yourself short. A bit of time and effort and you can be as smart as the guy giving this lecture.