As far as I'm concerned, Jack Smith is not a real boy, much like Pinnochio. He was never properly appointed as Special Counsel and therefore is just an ordinary citizen. I have zero interest in anything he has to say.
Thank you for educating our populace what our justice system is supposed to be and the mechanics of how it works - or is supposed to. Unfortunately the vast majority do not even have a basic understanding of the justice system and how important it is to having and maintaining our republic. Kudos!
Dear Sir, Thank you for all you do to help us understand what is going on. Please keep up the great work, and we will do our part as much as possible. Thanks again.
Hi Alan, I not only recommend your wonderful podcast, but I have bought several of your books and sent them as gifts to my children and friends. I tell them that your books are like taking a Harvard law school class. So you save a lot of educational costs just by reading your several excellent books. I love the way you summarize in straightforward and common language your years of experience and research on Constitutional issues. You are not just talking to us. You are teaching the members of the U.S. Supreme Court, and chastising them when they violate the constitution. Yes, when Dershowitz talks, the Supreme Court listens. But they are silent regarding exactly what they review. Anyone who fails to listen to Dershowitz is guilty of not reviewing all of the best analyses of the issues, which can lead to bias. Finally, you need to explain another very important issue for us older guys: how have you maintained your remarkable intellect, memory, and capability into your mid 80s. You're the man.
In the UK, a court case can be dismissed if there is malicious intent from the prosecutor. Does the US have anything similar? If not, then we should adopt the same rule to prevent lawfare from corrupt DAs.
I find it astounding that any prosecutors get to release these reports. They serve as a sort of extra-judicial trial, made worse by the lack of protections defendants rightfully enjoy in a courtroom setting. Do law schools offer courses in writing reports of this sort? Prosecutors should not issue them regardless, but in this case it is particularly egregious as Jack Smith is issuing one about a case the state has opted not to pursue.
Would you say that the lawyer that defended Casey Anthony did the right thing making up a story that her father abused her and made it appear as though the father was to blame?
I always enjoy your podcasts! I would love you to give us a "tour" of the various pieces of art work and other items hanging on your walls. Some look so interesting!
Hillary instigated the Russia Collusion Hoax and then lied about it for more than three years. Special Counsel John Durham exposed the conspiracy to take down Trump.
It's none of your business. Our right to vote is sacred. We must respect each other and allow everyone to vote t the way they want. Dersowich has never been obligated to become a Republican. People who are older understand this and aren't so rude as to try to pin this great man... On why he voted for who he does . He deserves respect. He wrote the book " get trump"detailing the way the lift tried to set him up. His colleagues gave him hell for defending Trump. Dersowich is considered a national treasure
This may have nothing to do with the subject...but if Trump was impeached by the house of representatives in his first term, doesn't that cancel it out, Constitutionally, and enable Trump to run for his second term in 2028?
How many times did prosecutors think they had a slam dunk conviction based on THEIR arrogant and narrow-minded point of view. Of course, that ego-driven opinion was upended once we got to cross examine witnesses and refute their evidence. 😂 Releasing such a report is anathema to due process and prosecutorial ethics IMO.
He was the prosecutor, not the judge, and he released the report because he couldn't win a prosecution to vindicate his investigation and was peeved over that. Releasing the root allows him to say, "See, I was right about this guy!" even though he couldn't do so in court. Then he tried to say he considered charging Trump with insurrection, but didn't only because he couldn't prove Trump intentionally incited "the insurrection"... of course, since NO ONE has actually been charged with insurrection, it would be literally impossible for anyone to be charged with inciting one. This was his way of accusing Trump of a crime without actually having evidence that crime was committed by anyone, let alone Trump.
65 years of Harvard law professor..a premiere defense attorney with mostly all wins. An advisor on high profile cases. And an author of 55 books. If only those walls could talk
The did that to show they're contempt for Carter. They didn't want him to have the glory of releasing the hostages. So they waited till REAGEN was elected
Yes, you do reinterpret the Constitution in a partisan manner. Nearly every time you discuss 2A, you reinterpret "well-regulated" to have some to do with government regulations, but that's not what they meant in the 18th century, as contemporary documents show. "Well-regulated" is more akin to "well-oiled." Quote gun stats all you want, but stop reinterpreting the Constitution!
Ballsy of you to challenge the considered number one expert on constitutional law in the United States. He knows it frontwards and back wards. Been law professor at Harvard 60 years. He's the most fair attorney ever. Use some respect and just politely agree to disagree.
you said the baby and the mother were killed, murdered. I don't recall seeing any evident or verdict that concluded such an assertion. how can Alan make this statement, where is the evidence. This is the problem with war, the first causality is the truth.
Professor, YOU are the ONLY Democrat that I can stand, I like you very much. Have you ever thought on jumping over to our side? The democrat party has literally turned to Shite!!
Perhaps Professor Dershowitz's most admirable quality is that of his dedication to being an honest broker.
Thanks Alan. I trust you and I am a conservative. Thanks for telling the truth.
A lifelong Democrat here from Ohio. I appreciate your objective analysis and the clarity you bring to what is going on. Keep up the good work.
As far as I'm concerned, Jack Smith is not a real boy, much like Pinnochio. He was never properly appointed as Special Counsel and therefore is just an ordinary citizen. I have zero interest in anything he has to say.
Perhaps you should review the prior court decisions on Special Counsels. Just a thought.
Thank you, Professor.
I have always been a FAN and have valued your opinions over the decades. Thank you for standing up for American Citizens and Justice.
Thank you for educating our populace what our justice system is supposed to be and the mechanics of how it works - or is supposed to. Unfortunately the vast majority do not even have a basic understanding of the justice system and how important it is to having and maintaining our republic. Kudos!
Enjoy watching you, Prof D. Thank you for always being a voice of reason. You are appreciated
Dear Sir, Thank you for all you do to help us understand what is going on. Please keep up the great work, and we will do our part as much as possible. Thanks again.
Hi Alan, I not only recommend your wonderful podcast, but I have bought several of your books and sent them as gifts to my children and friends. I tell them that your books are like taking a Harvard law school class. So you save a lot of educational costs just by reading your several excellent books. I love the way you summarize in straightforward and common language your years of experience and research on Constitutional issues. You are not just talking to us. You are teaching the members of the U.S. Supreme Court, and chastising them when they violate the constitution. Yes, when Dershowitz talks, the Supreme Court listens. But they are silent regarding exactly what they review. Anyone who fails to listen to Dershowitz is guilty of not reviewing all of the best analyses of the issues, which can lead to bias. Finally, you need to explain another very important issue for us older guys: how have you maintained your remarkable intellect, memory, and capability into your mid 80s. You're the man.
Great observation this is why we just love your show
Outstanding Mr. Dershowitz. 🫡🇺🇸🙏
At this point hypocrisy is one of the requirements for being a politician.
Love watching you, Alan. You are so brilliant yet convey information so clearly and succinctly.
Prosecutors are supposed to seek truth and justice not merely to tack hides to the wall
I just found your show and thoroughly enjoy. You have taught us so much through the years. Thank you.
You prove you love the law and the constitution It doesn't matter if you are Democrat or Republican you only know what's the law
Greetings, Professor Dershowitz. It's always a pleasure to see your podcast . Saludos.
In the UK, a court case can be dismissed if there is malicious intent from the prosecutor. Does the US have anything similar? If not, then we should adopt the same rule to prevent lawfare from corrupt DAs.
Ur a blessing from God above
Well spoken, as always Professor.
Thank you for discussing this
Abortion is not a "bedroom" issue. It is a matter of protecting the life of a beautiful defenseless unborn baby from brutal murder.
Happy New Year love your show ❤❤❤
THANK YOU
Amazing that Hamas have come to the party a few days before Trump comes into power.
The dersh show is an excellent show continue the good work
Smith was illegally installed
PBS did just the opposite....they basically validated jack smith this evening. Professor Dershowitz you are a wise man.
Of course PBS did! Smh
Love to you, Dersh.
I find it astounding that any prosecutors get to release these reports. They serve as a sort of extra-judicial trial, made worse by the lack of protections defendants rightfully enjoy in a courtroom setting. Do law schools offer courses in writing reports of this sort? Prosecutors should not issue them regardless, but in this case it is particularly egregious as Jack Smith is issuing one about a case the state has opted not to pursue.
Even Eileen Cannon realized that she had no jurisdiction and ofright to try to block Jack Smith's report from being published.
Oh, we knew it was 420,000 views. Well deserved.
As it has been said, "Jack Smith isn't a real boy!"
Found a fellow Robert Gouveia fan!
When I watch Professor Dershowitz I feel like a college kid, learning something new.
Professor, we knew what you meant when you said how many views you had. But, 420,000 views is great. Congratulations!
Would you say that the lawyer that defended Casey Anthony did the right thing making up a story that her father abused her and made it appear as though the father was to blame?
Jack Smith wants one more moment in the limelight.
In the dark, all soldiers better be equal You cant be dragging someone with you slowing the squad down.
I always enjoy your podcasts! I would love you to give us a "tour" of the various pieces of art work and other items hanging on your walls. Some look so interesting!
Garland created that mess
How could you possibly support Hillary?
Hillary instigated the Russia Collusion Hoax and then lied about it for more than three years. Special Counsel John Durham exposed the conspiracy to take down Trump.
It's none of your business. Our right to vote is sacred. We must respect each other and allow everyone to vote t the way they want. Dersowich has never been obligated to become a Republican. People who are older understand this and aren't so rude as to try to pin this great man... On why he voted for who he does . He deserves respect. He wrote the book " get trump"detailing the way the lift tried to set him up. His colleagues gave him hell for defending Trump. Dersowich is considered a national treasure
@@kaydeedid I'm not questioning his vote, only his sanity.
The reason you had 420k views is that you use your legal mind to talk common sense, we appreciate you.
Hypocrisy abounds
We are always negotiating suckers. Why????
I think they all like nasty gossip in which truth is irrelevant.
We are way too tribal and easily manipulated.
I can't tell my friends to watch this cuz I don't have any friends.
Mismo
@@mattjewett4473 Bravo 😂
Half Truth = Whole Lie
This may have nothing to do with the subject...but if Trump was impeached by the house of representatives in his first term, doesn't that cancel it out, Constitutionally, and enable Trump to run for his second term in 2028?
He wasn't convicted by the Senate, so the first term counts.
How many times did prosecutors think they had a slam dunk conviction based on THEIR arrogant and narrow-minded point of view. Of course, that ego-driven opinion was upended once we got to cross examine witnesses and refute their evidence. 😂 Releasing such a report is anathema to due process and prosecutorial ethics IMO.
Is that "I've supported other presidents I didn't vote for," or, "I've supported other presidents, I didn't vote for,"?
Why did the judge release the report?
Get Trump. I guess you will get the book if you haven’t done so as yet.
He was the prosecutor, not the judge, and he released the report because he couldn't win a prosecution to vindicate his investigation and was peeved over that. Releasing the root allows him to say, "See, I was right about this guy!" even though he couldn't do so in court. Then he tried to say he considered charging Trump with insurrection, but didn't only because he couldn't prove Trump intentionally incited "the insurrection"... of course, since NO ONE has actually been charged with insurrection, it would be literally impossible for anyone to be charged with inciting one. This was his way of accusing Trump of a crime without actually having evidence that crime was committed by anyone, let alone Trump.
Would enjoy you discussing the mementos on your walls.
65 years of Harvard law professor..a premiere defense attorney with mostly all wins. An advisor on high profile cases. And an author of 55 books. If only those walls could talk
The boomerang will soon return,
Dersh I bet Trump said u release the "day" I take office just like the Iranians did with Reagan.
The did that to show they're contempt for Carter. They didn't want him to have
the glory of releasing the hostages. So they waited till REAGEN was elected
Smith can't find a publisher?
WELCOME TO MAGA THINKING!
Sentors just grand stand
Yes, you do reinterpret the Constitution in a partisan manner. Nearly every time you discuss 2A, you reinterpret "well-regulated" to have some to do with government regulations, but that's not what they meant in the 18th century, as contemporary documents show. "Well-regulated" is more akin to "well-oiled." Quote gun stats all you want, but stop reinterpreting the Constitution!
Ballsy of you to challenge the considered number one expert on constitutional law in the United States. He knows it frontwards and back wards. Been law professor at Harvard 60 years. He's the most fair attorney ever. Use some respect and just politely agree to disagree.
Are the Israeli negotiators doing a good job versus Hamas?
Yes extortions
It just dawned on me. You’re red pilled but don’t know it yet.
The only reason to have women in combat is if the society is decedent or desperate.
I understood it was 420 thousand views. Either that or a marijuana joke.
Alan check out America Speaks Ink
Starts the show out with Jew talk .. I'm so proud of you❤
Need to fix your studio lighting, particularly that overhead. Good for reading, bad for background glare and washout.
46th, 14 January 2025
She's terrible
you said the baby and the mother were killed, murdered. I don't recall seeing any evident or verdict that concluded such an assertion. how can Alan make this statement, where is the evidence. This is the problem with war, the first causality is the truth.
Professor, YOU are the ONLY Democrat that I can stand, I like you very much. Have you ever thought on jumping over to our side? The democrat party has literally turned to Shite!!