Wow! The new Pinocchio movie is terrible!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 сен 2024
- Get Surfshark VPN at Surfshark.deal... - Enter promo code RILLAS for 83% off and 3 extra months for free!
Schaff needs a vacation!
Editor's Channels:
Goop: / goopvideos
Patreon: / schaffrillas
Twitter: / schaffrillas
Redbubble: www.redbubble.....
Reddit: / schaffrillas. .
Esteemed $5+ Patrons:
aheaney15
Aiden Mcgillicuddy
Amaru Dejesus
Alexandra
Andre Gutierrez
Andrew Young
Anna Chanthaphavong
Ashley Forrest
BATMAN
Boolobo
CG Lemonade
Charlotte M
Childish Memphino
Clarissa Wee
ClownDuck
Cole Jackson
Crimson Court
Daniel Goldhorn
Danmccould
Delaina Rachelle
Dman990099
Dr Noe Context
Edgar Gutierrez
Emily Allen
Eric Banks
Flan
Francis Sheepie
Gabi Christie
Gabriel Vega Barreto
Gavin T360
Hankshark
Harvey Mulvihill
Ian Seebach
Jacob Baum
Jacob LaBossiere
Jake Albert
Jake G
Jonathan Kermanian
Joseph
Juan-the-Dingus
Justin Gonzales
Kim Trakartwichit
KingsDay
Leif Bradshaw
Logan McQuaid
Matt Fernandes
Michael David Rose
Michael Thomas
Migs
Milky
Milosz Kluski
MirrorWqve
Nessie
Night Man52
NoneLovesMe
Oceanechoes
Olivia Mendel
Osbers Gaming
Peri
Peter Hollens
Pierre Desbrieres
PinkiePotPie
Prismabunny
Put 9-Volt in Smash Bros. Please
Quetzal the Snek
rEactor
Reagan DeFriece
Rebel Friend
Red Mustached Alien
Rocco Damiano
RoscoesDad
Ryland Tews
Sassy
Scott St Jean
Seth Howell
Soloco
Suarez
Sugargae
SuperJimmy978
Tailored Muffin
Teasel
That Guy Named Rai
The GAG Reflex
The TARDIS Pig/TC
Tom
Toxic shock
Tyler Rumbold
Uncultured Swine
Vellum Tony
Vintage
Volianer
Wafflegamr
Winny
YINSED
![BAK Jay - Find Out (For Your Love) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/10FJO_XBCvY/mqdefault.jpg)
Let's not forget how this movie completely ruined Pinocchio's character: he never makes mistakes and is always the victim in every situation.
He’s a Gary Stu
You need to take away his agency. Otherwise, he might take a sip of beer. Despite being _not even a real child._
Edit: It was root beer. Not sure why I wrote "beer".
The Evan Hansen movie-ification of Pinocchio
exactly bro
In the original story pinocchio is a jerk, and everybody in italy likes it
The fact they didn't use actual puppets is such a missed opportunity
But that would take skill
or muppets!
Wow didn’t think of that.
@@Little_Eris there's also ANOTHER Pinocchio film that used actual puppets from 1996 called The Adventures of Pinocchio.
i had it on vhs and it's honestly great. somehow the CGI from that film looks infinitely better than this one from 2022. i'd say that's pretty damn embarassing on disney's part.
@@dragonkingofthestars honestly, they'll probably make CGI Muppets at some point since "it's not like people will notice the difference"
Also it’s implied that Pinocchio goes with the fox because he was bullied, rather than because he was naive and gullible. In the original, Pinocchio never gets to school and the fox convinces him that school is for chumps and that being an actor is better. In the remake, Pinocchio is bullied and kicked out of school because he’s a puppet, and then goes with the fox. It totally destroys the message of the story from the start.
Fits with the current, woke, perpetual victimhood complex though, right?
It wasn't Pinocchio's poor choices, it was puppet discriminations I tells ya!
THIS 👍
Sounds like an alternate universe where he sucefully goes to school before meeting the fox 🤣
The new Disney writers have the intelligence of a 3rd grader. They don't realize character flaws and/or arcs make a character more relatable and interesting.
Just like how they ruined the many messages of this movie
Remember kids if you got bullied just leave school instead of addressing the problem or trying to ignore it just leave school
I heard they also ruined the moral about skipping school. In the original, he's tempted to go to pleasure island, and chooses it over school. In this remake, he chooses to go to school, then the school kicks him out for being a puppet, then he goes to pleasure island. So instead of learning a valuable lesson about the consequences of his own actions, now he's a victim.
Wrong, he didn’t choose pleasure island, he was manipulated by Honest John to be sold to a puppet show and perform for it under false pretenses. Pleasure island was later and he still didn’t choose to go there. Pinocchio is still a victim in both movies.
At least in the original (not Disney's, I honestly forgot how the 1940 movie goes), Pinocchio tries to go to school in both cases, but he's naive and easily charmed by the wrong people. Pinocchio trades his school textbook for a couple pennies to watch the puppet show and he ends up joining them on stage for fun. Stromboli is angry because Pinocchio ruined his show and wants to throw him in the fireplace, but he's moved by his cries and decides to free him and gift him five golden coins (which he later lets Honest John and Gideon steal by being naive).
As for Pleasure Island, there's a point where Pinocchio tries to be good and get back to school, but he's charmed by his classmate Candlewick who refuses Pinocchio's advice to come to school with him. Candlewick claims that he can't go to school that day because he's waiting midnight to go to Pleasure Island. Pinocchio is initially doubtful, but Candlewick manages to convince him to come along when he says that in Pleasure Island you can play all day and schools don't exist.
Pinocchio is a victim of naivety BUT he does bring bad things upon himself because no one ever forces him to make bad choices, he's the one who chooses to trust strangers and pick what he thinks is the 'easiest effortless way' instead of staying with the people who love him and want the best for him.
Sums up modern day society 😭
That's actually really messed up.
review was pretty spot on. Can Disney STOP treating 2D animation like it's a sin that needs to be overwritten? It's an art form, leave your old IPs alone. We don't need to see a "live-action" that just ends up being cheap uncanny-valley GCI anyway.
Well, they can't REALLY leave their IPs alone.
They changed copyright/trademark laws so that instead of them entering the public domain after X years (they were about to lose Mickey Mouse) you got to keep them forever so long as you did stuff with them.
That's why topless Winnie the Pooh entered public domain and is getting a slasher film. Nobody used it.
It was either use Disney's Pinocchio (his specific design) or lose him forever.
Isn't it CGI?
It's not cheap, and that's the worst part. A lot of money and hard work goes into making these terrible movies.
@@patrichardlol my autocorrect
@@bolbyballinger the difference is, Disney doesn’t own Pinocchio, and never has, hence the million other Pinocchio films coming out at the moment. They can’t even use the excuse that they’re trying to hold onto the IP in this instance, they’re just money-hungry.
It really feels like Disney just wants to end their own company at this point, like a suicidal immortal.
Nah they’re just seeing how much shit they can get away with
Unironically the Drake arc.
*sigh* Someday, but not today.
I think they're being lazy but also cowardly as they don't try to do any different or different in a way that add to the story black Ariel can work out they had a Jamaican talking crab in the animated movie but Disney isn't going to do anything that add to it or view in a different light or something it'll be the same but Ariel is black laziness also their a 1975Japanese little mermaids she a blonde Asian and was curious instead of want to be free form the sea also their a 2019 Pinocchio made by Italian on Amazon it ok but it different and interesting
As far as kid consume any shit they do (like my little sister) its ok for them lol
Im astounded by how bad the cgi was. They're literally devolving, probably because of how they underpay and overwork their vfx artists :/
They’ve also been coming out with a LOT of new content for their streaming platform so they’re just literally overworking the employees at this point
@@geneveandersson Yup, pretty unethical, and just silly, because they get worse work because of it :/
@@geneveandersson Polygon Count can replace quality of work!
- Disney Executives probably
vfx artists are not unionized. ever wonder why something that shouldve been a practical effect was cgi? (cough cough she hulk) ... well... makeup and costume artists are unionized.
@@ms-plasma-mc ok, that makes sense. Someone seriously needs to make one. I'm sure that they've been trying to start a union, but that has got to be the top priority right now.
Now remember: Disney uses CGI for everything because almost all other film groups are unionized, but CGI groups often aren't and can thusly be abused with long hours and under payment
classic disney move lmfao
Yikes
@@drawingwinxstyle9193corporations are heartless.
Their sole intention is to make a net profit at literally any cost. They’ll do it if it means getting an extra penny.
Ah. That explains it!
@@drawingwinxstyle9193 Capitalism! 😈
About the donkey-beer thing, when I was 4 I accidently drank a sip of my dad's hard lemonade thinking it was normal lemonade. I then ran from my neighbors house to my house sobbing thinking I would turn into a donkey. Then I never drank any alcohol until I was 21 to make a point to my dad. So, yeah, the consequence thing definitely does work
Now imagine kids today thinking the same thing but with root beer instead. Sounds like an unintentional consequence on Disney’s part
It’s just missed opportunity not including those elements. Disappointing
@@owenwolfco.8344 is root beer still junk though?
@@SlapstickGenius23 no it isn’t
Lololol coward
Also, Pinocchio purposefully lying to make his nose grow was literally already done in Shrek 2. I can’t believe Schaff didn’t mention that.
was scrolling to find this comment, glad I'm not the only one who noticed
apparently that is done in several other versions of the story. but yeah also kinda surprised he didn't mention it
It was done better in shrek 2, this is just painfully bad
@Robert Monroe They're briefs!
Hey! I know this isn’t related but can Schaffrillas please do a video on the Kirby final bosses ranking and see how that ends up? Just spreading the word.
My favorite part of the movie is when Pinocchio said "Father, when can I leave to be on my own"
Those lines changed my life
I knew the movie would be a masterpiece, I was Pauly sure of it
Yes, they can never be replicated!
“I want the whole world to see…” The Pauley Shore Pinocchio movie is haunting my dreams.
hes got the whole world to see
"She serves no purpose and only exists to pad out the runtime."
How... as Disney... do you *invent filler plotlines* for an 80 year old movie's remake...
It's a diversity character
Every movie has to be 2 hours long now. Disney movies used to be around an hour long.
I understand why they removed the smoking and drinking alcohol references to make it more family friendly. But now, it just seems like the kids are being punished for doing typical childlike things, like consuming candy and root beer, which defeats the whole purpose of the Anti smoking and drinking moral.
I understand why as well, but I also don't like it at all 😭 I would add that real kids do get introduced to harmful substances by their friends every day. The movie had a chance to really drive home a good message by keeping the smoking and drinking but by taking those things out, it's unlikely most kids are gonna understand.
Parent groups would descend upon Disney's like Helm's Deep had they shown kids drinking and smoking, which is why they really should have done it.
I mean, the actual moral is anti-hedonism. Why do you think parents were okay with the substances in the original in the first place? Anti-smoking wasn't really a thing.
No, the moral is that pleasures in excess lead somebody to become a bum (or jackass, one might say). And how do bums get by? Letting themselves get exploited by greedy capitalists sneaking unfair contracts onto their ignorant behinds.
It's so stupid how we've gone backwards in censors that we can't show kids drinking and smoking when it's explicitly shown to be bad
Kinda surprised the original did an anti-smoking message given Walt Disney himself WAS a heavy smoker.
The fact that Disney completely undermines the message of the original is painful. At this point, they’re completely disrespecting their legacy.
It was all foreshadowed when Pinocchio literally studied and smelled a pile of shit
@time to leave earth what would happen if i click
pinocchio was one of my favorite movies when i was a kid and it did a great job at me hating beer and smoking, and being scared of donkeys
When that happened, I was starting to get major confusion and started wondering if what I was watching was real or me alucinating due to my tiredness. For my surprise, It was actually part of the movie 👽
@Thank me later 🅥 It's alive? Kill it with fire
Imagine if disney makes a live Action bleach series after buying the streaming rights for bleach the thousand year blood war
Imagine having the audacity to create a live-action remake that somehow manages to look more “wooden” than the original animated movie. This was so insultingly bad! On a side note, I am enthusiastic about Del Torro Pinocchio coming to Netflix. The animation itself already makes it worth watching. It looks beautiful and feels like there's actual heart and care put into it.
@@gta6footage64 link to the clip of me roasting your mom
omg yes! I'm super excited for it since he's stated that it's his passion project.
Kind of rich that Robert Zemeckis, who always stated that he believed that Back To The Future should never be remaked/rebooted, is totally OK with directing this garbage and The Witches (2020).
Haha, I get it!
The third Pinocchio movie's the charm!
Guillermo de toro: Fine, I'll do it myself
Disney: oh sh-t !!!
He didn't do shit
Guillermo de toro: you should’ve gone for a good remake Disney.
The worst part is... Pinnochio has proved it can be done in Live action. There's an amazing 2019 Italian film of Pinnochio, and the make up they use for the boy Is INCREDIBLE. The fact that Disney Made something less creative than a low budget (only $15 million) production, is depressant.
theres also an italian live action miniseries from 1972 and it's great, it's a shame that (at least to my knowledge) it's not known internationally
Bellissimo quel film, con Roberto Benigni che interpreta Geppetto, poi.
Great movie. Also Roberto Benigni (the guy from Life Is Beautiful) plays Geppetto
is that the one that has this REALLY scary scene of Pinocchio becoming like wood? I specifically remember a scene like that and scared the hell outta me.
Edit - oh NV I think that was from Adventures of Pinocchio. Oof. Nightmare inducing
Disney technically had some practice with Once Upon a Time.
What made the original 1940 Pinnochio film special is that it came right after Snow White, the first feature-length animated movie. Pinnochio was Disney saying "well we proved we can do it and do it well, now let's show em what else we can do!" And because of that, the film is beautiful and well-animated, full of whimsy and wonder. There's a reason "When You Wish Upon A Star" is the theme of Disney as a whole: one of Walt Disney's greatest virtues was his passion for fantasy, and his desire to make dreams and imagination come to life, and Pinnochio is probably one of the best exemplars of that virtue.
Remembering that, just makes me want burn every copy that exist from this remake
Original Disney's Pinocchio was a film made by a young studio, hungry for success..
This Pinocchio was made by a souless, mega-conglomerate corporation which churns schlop like this out dime a dozen. Not only that, it was, of course, fashioned to fit certain quotas, and tic certain boxes first. Story and quality came second, and it shows.
Aye, as much as I don't necessarily view Disney in the best light due to some of his ruthless business practices, I will say that he had a burning passion that eclipsed many animators, especially animators from our time. He had his dream, ambition, and passion driving his projects to becoming what they are, and I respect that drive towards making Disney as big a name as it is.
@@SoupCanMafia Walt Disney had a philosophy on making art. "Make money to make art." He was all about making his work and entertaining people and it shows.
Remember what walt Disney said
The best kinds of kids movies are the ones that can be enjoyed by everyone and not just kids
The thing that bothered me the most was the fact that they showed Pinocchio's school and them kicking him out. He actively chose to listen to Jiminy by going to class instead of chasing fame, but then gets punished for it - so of course he chooses to go with the fox... because what the hell else was he gonna do? It removes Pinocchio's own choice to make a bad call and suffer the consequences - trashing the whole theme of the story
Hey! I know this isn’t related but can Schaffrillas please do a video on the Kirby final bosses ranking and see how that ends up? Just spreading the word.
@@emoji3266 bot
@@NinjaTyler 😂
@@emoji3266 I don't ever remember him doing anything on games, so I wouldn't count on it but I can't say for sure he would never
Bro this was my biggest gripe with this movie. Pinocchio is never portrayed in a bad light but rather he is the innocent boy that doesn't wanna trash anything in pleasure Island, got kidnapped and sent there, barely drinks fookin root beer, and so on. Which at that point he is just a victim to the plot and other characters which makes his implied transformation in the end meaningless.
Also they done the fairy dirty, not only with no amount of screen time but her dress and wings is smt u can get from some Halloween store, full glittered dress and plastic wings and all lol
Funny that in the Pinocchio movies the people is freaked out about a walking puppet and not the two metres tall Fox in hobo clothes.
Welcome to Disney World, where the rules are made up and the laws of physics don't matter.
Well maybe in that universe, animated puppets are considered unnatural but walking foxes in clothes and having financial issues is considered normal?
Funny that the fox is better animated than the entirety of the lion king remake
Well I'm gonna assume that anthropomorphic animals is more natural than a living puppet
Pinocchio is a highly metaphorical novel that Disney has distorted (and ruined)
In the original book pinocchio kills the talking cricket, is hanged by the cat and the fox, leads Geppetto to be arrested, after turning into a donkey he is exploited as a freak and remains lame
Funny Book
It's pretty bad when Tom Hanks' acting was more wooden and lifeless than the CG puppet.
Cringe af
With this and Elvis, 2022 hasn't been a good year for Tom Hanks to do accents.
he just drops the accent later in the movie too lmayo
I don’t understand what happened with Tom Hanks. He used to rarely, if ever, miss with his performances. Forrest Gump, The Green Mile, Castaway. When’s the last time he turned in an actually great performance?
@@nathanmcguire932 I thought he was great in Captain Phillips & Saving Mr. Banks. And both those films were released almost a decade ago.
The new Disney live-action remake of a 2D-animated classic is actually awful? Who would've fucking guessed?!
A Breaking Bad video in a Pinocchio video?
ruclips.net/video/Z6zpUaf2Efo/видео.html
Fr tho
Hey! I know this isn’t related but can Schaffrillas please do a video on the Kirby final bosses ranking and see how that ends up? Just spreading the word.
Hey guys, stop making joke posts based on the bot posts. I don't know which of you to report.
Pinocchio totally CAN be made in live action. there's an italian adaptation of it made in 2019 and it's hauntingly beautiful. the humanoid characters still look amazing in cgi, the makeup for pinocchio looks like it's made of real wood, literally every character is spot on. it's a shame it was never exported outside of Italy. as an italian I tend to dislike stuff made here because the films here tend to be boring and cheap, but this genuinely made into my fav films list.
also, by the way you spoke abt stuff it seems like you don't know, but Pinocchio was originally an italian comic strip so there's not that much of an "italian stereotype" when the character itself was made by an italian lol /lh
But isn't cgi still animation?
What's the point of a live action if you're going to animate your main characters?
The 2019 Pinocchio was actually released in the U.S. many months ago.
if anyone ask it on Amazon prime also the fox dude are human in this one but you get a different type of creature showing up to make up for that
Completamente d'accordo!
Hey I remember that one. The donkey scene was haunting
Pinocchio using his growing nose to get a key to escape imprisonment is exactly what they did in Shrek 2.
The issue with 'Pinocchio lies so he can get the key' is just because he has the key doesn't mean his free -- his freakishly long nose still traps him in the cage. He has to now find a way to make his nose shrink back to its original size so he can escape.
@@EpicJoshua314 if he tells the truth his nose goes down
That's exactly what I thought
@@garyslayton8340 or doesn’t grow at all
And that scene was hilarious. Shrek can do what it wants because it's a parody & it usually aims for comedy. But Disney portraying lying in a positive light just doesn't work if everything else is meant to be taken seriously (even though the poor writing, CGI, etc. is such a joke).
There's a scene near the end where Gepetto "dies" and Pinocchio cries over him while humming When You Wish Upon A Star. I turned to my friend and joked "Watch, he's gonna shed a single tear and it's gonna land on Gepetto's cheek and bring him back to life"
And then _literally that exact thing happened as I was talking._ When I tell you we _screamed--!_
The icing on the cake is, I swear that whole sequence was SHOT-FOR-SHOT IDENTICAL to the same scene in Tangled. Like, same angles and everything, the tear lands in the same spot on his cheek, it was unbelievable.
Tbh, the way Eugene comes back to life is my biggest problem with Tangled, even as a big fan of that movie. It’s so dues ex machina it hurts. But they couldn’t find any other way to revive him, so…
But yeah, I hate how Disney lazily copied the scene like that? I will never watch this movie and most other live action remakes (well besides Cinderella, that’s pretty much one of the only ones I’m fine with existing).
@@KazuhaEien i get the feeling they wanted to do a live action version of cinderella simply because they retold the story, then when the money came they thought "hey, we could remake all the other movies". cinderella 2016 was not a shot for shot remake like the other live action movies. it was just built around the scenes necessary to tell the story and diverged on the rest. it was unique enough to stand on its own. the other movies are so redundant you are better off just watching the original
The same scene also happened in Pinocchio: A True Story.
I’m gonna let that one sink in for ya
@@drawingwinxstyle9193 beauty and beast live action is better, story-wise.
If that was me watching the movie, I probably wouldve burst out laughing, not just due to the sheer AUDACITY that this remake was trying to make you feel SOMETHING for this mock version of Pinocchio character, but because I can't stop thinking of Saberspark's theory that this movie is the product of Tom Hank's character from "Cast Away" having a fever dream while knocked out on his raft trying to get home🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I'm Italian: Pinocchio is very important for us in Italy. It makes me sad that a magnificent tale like this has been ruined this bad by some marketing shit that Disney wants us too see and purchase. When you have time I suggest you to read the original Pinocchio book by Collodi, I'm sure you'll have a great time with that.
I think the original had Pinocchio getting robbed, threatened, jailed, turned into a donkey and dismembered. And I think the idea of fairytales being made for kids yet treating the readers like decent human beings instead of underdeveloped ones made me happy.
There is a version of Pinocchio that comes out in December which is directed by Guillermo Del Toro (the director of Pan's Labyrinth) and is stop motion as well. This one seems very promising and the trailer looks gorgeous
@@theluminaryofthestars4181 (hanged too, amongst what you mentioned! Shit was grim fam)
Waiting for the Del Toro version, that looks really promising
I read the original book when I was a child and it scared the shit out of me, then I watched the 2019 Italian film directed by Mateo Garrone as an adult and it scared the shit out of me too. It’s basically a page-by-page adaptation and therefore the definitive Pinocchio film IMO. Del Toro’s looks amazing but I can tell by the trailer alone that he’s not going for a faithful adaptation.
That girl is such a missed opportunity.
Like, after the first scene I thought the point was that because of the wooden leg, Pinocchio thought he could trust her more than other humans.
But no, it’s just for the ‘heartfelt’ new song she has so Disney can get a Grammy/Tony/ whatever bullshit academy awards.
There was a new song? I don't even remember that 😬 And I'm supposed to have a pretty good memory
Just curious,
are there any fairy tales you'd like seeing adapted by Disney?
That won’t get any nominations
@@notationmusical Preferably not a single one.
@@Maria.Mirabella
that's fair.
Del Toro's version of Pinocchio came out awhile back and MAN is it great!
The scenery of the whole thing is stunning, the entire thing is in stop motion and they've been working on it for 5 years if I remember correctly.
The story is heart-wrenching and will (probably) make you cry the entire time. You get attached to the characters (Pinocchio, Geppetto, CandleWick, The Cricket guy thing, sorry can't remember his name) and just want to hold them and watch em and (for me at least) protect them with all your heart.
I hope you watch the movie and can give a review on it and enjoy it as much as I do! More people should watch this movie honestly.
Sebastian J Cricket. The dogfish even has such an awesome and authentic design that kinda reminds me of those medieval illustrations of sea monsters on maps.
Del Toro crew done it such topnotch job!
Literally, was so Shocked it came out so incredible! I loved the story, the animation. It absolutely brings Disney to shame!
Not even 5 years, they worked on that movie for 15 years! :D it's amazing, with all the detail put into everything. You can really see they care about that movie.. unlike disneys version
Yeah, del toro said he always wanted (for many years) to do HIS version of Pinocchio, his darker version! And well I must say it came out absolutely brilliant & beautiful! Great unique film. I knew it would be good and interesting af cause it's Del Toro but daamn it was even better than I thought, just positively surprised
This is literally the first time I've heard of this movie even *existing* so either Disney Marketing really dropped the ball or knew that saving the ad money would be a better investment than trying to sell this clump of raw egg whites
Congrats on inventing a new Insult right there
I’ve seen the trailer a few times and it actually looked great but I guess the movie is shit
i have disney plus and knew it was coming out yet still forgot about it until i got recommended this video
@@allnightercinema All I remember seeing a Sudanese bald man using a weird dress and a wand. That looked AWFUL and well, it set my expectations in the right bar.
@@N12015 are you talking about the fairy? She looked fine, just think the costume design would’ve looked better if she had more hair & brows
Disney: "Hey kids! Do you want us to make an unnecessary live action adaptation of an animated movie that actually great and doesn't deserve it?"
Everyone: "No! Please don't!"
Disney: "You said yes? Okay then!"
You know, i thought disney started doing better decisions, when they bought the streaming rights for bleach thousand year blood war
@time to leave earth why do you esoxjdjdjd
@@legendaresn6983 I wouldn't say Disney isn't fully back on the right track I mean, look at what happened to them this year which I won't get into because that is an entirely different can of worms.
I think Disney is more like: "F#$@ you kids! We're going to tell you what you want!
@@n2badsam420 I mean since when did the betting wars between crunchyroll, netflix and disney+ happened? Could be a couple of months against the 1-2 years needed for the movies
It’s impressive how many bad live action remakes Disney is making lately
It's like they are actively trying to make the worst of the worst in these live actions remakes. Like, you have to TRY to make a live action this bad.
At least The Jungle Book Remake is actually pretty good.
@@liamphibia That’s the only one worth watching. But that one’s actually really good
Atlantis and Treasure Planet fans can rest easy knowing Disney will never touch their movie even the 5 fans of Home on The Range
Least cruella was decent
4:48 "Also, in the scene where his nose grows, instead of it fully being about learning a lesson that lying is bad, now he instead uses his growing nose as a means to get the key and escape."
So they even ripped off of Shrek 2?
Pinocchio is gonna be a great president for Italia, its all i can think after seeing that scene
The decision to remove all references to smoking and drinking alcohol in favor of consuming candy and root beer not only removes the anti smoking and drinking message of the original, but basically punishes the children for doing typical child-like things.
Yeah. I think they removed it because Karens would complain
@@blackstar044 Just so you know, this is a bot that copied someone else’s comment.
@@kaleenar963 Ok
@@kaleenar963 What?
... Huh, I guess it is. Well neither of them are wrong.
Well, the boys smoking cigars wasn’t in the original Collodi novel. It’s *exclusive* to the Disney version. Plus, there are other ways to show the boys’ actions in Pleasure Island as immoral without having to show them smoking.
If they make a live action Ratatouille I will die.
REAL
I’ll make sure of it.
Disney stop profiting off of my nostalgia
I'm more worried about a live action Great Mouse Detective
Now make them do it with real rats
After seeing the vibrant and colorful love letter to Italy that was Luca, perhaps the most disappointing aspect to me was seeing how soulless and dreary this Pinocchio’s Italy is. Even in the 1940 animation, the backdrops themselves seemed to come to life on canvas. It’s sad to me that if I didn’t know this was set in Italy, I would have never known wherever this sad, grey village takes place in.
Even the most generic vaguely European Middle Ages village from the most generic Isekai anime is crafted with more personality than the village in this film.
My biggest issue with this remake is they changed events related to the story in ways that ruin the overall message. Pinocchio in the original film is convinced to join the puppet show instead of going to school. This is why he faces the consequences of his actions. In this movie he actually makes it to school, defeating the purpose of the life lesson. When Pinocchio goes to Pleasure Island he indulges in smoking and even implies he was breaking things with an axe. He's then transformed into a donkey which was a metaphor for saying he was being a jackass. In contrast in this movie he refused to break anything, there weren't any cigars, and kids drinking root beer is hardly a problem. Once again this movie missed the true purpose of why the scene worked in the original. Being turned into a half donkey in this movie isn't justified.
The whole point of the original film is that Pinocchio doesn't know right from wrong and he's easily lead astray. And when he makes the wrong choices there are consequences for his actions. These experiences are meant to build his character into an individual that learned from his mistakes and eventually chooses to do the right thing. But in this movie he's already trying to do the right thing all along. Sure, he's easily convinced to do the wrong thing a few times almost choosing not to go to school, but Jiminy catches up with him convincing Pinocchio to go to school before he could complete his bad decision. Then there's the time where he selflessly put Geppetto before the puppet show and his donkey ears and tail vanish. The problem with this scene is it has no meaning because he never really tried to do anything wrong in the first place. When the plot is about learning from your mistakes and then the movie doesn't allow you to make them in the first place, you have failed to make a faithful adaptation.
Why do people write long pretentious comments as if people care
@@megastarwarsrocks99 i care
@@megastarwarsrocks99 some people enjoy publicly writing their thoughts and others enjoy reading said thoughts.
@@megastarwarsrocks99 That's like asking why people make videos like this. Its so obvious two other people beat me to the punch explaining it, lol. Its because its fun to convey one's opinion and enjoyable to see what others think of your thoughts.
@@megastarwarsrocks99 Because some of us have a decent attention span.
They literally stole the "Pinocchio needs to lie to extend his nose to get free" beat from Shrek 2. Disney is now living down to their own parodies.
And doing it 18 years later too.
Not just that, it was also used in that old Pinocchio and The Emperor of the Darkness (i think thats its name?) from even WAY earlier, so its even LESS original
The running question of Disney Remakes is “Who genuinely asked for these?”
Cause last I checked not a whole lot of people are asking for these remakes.
I think the issue is that, despite no one claiming to want these live action movies, people still go see them out of curiosity. If these movies make money, Disney will continue to make them.
I don't think anyone is. No one asked for them. If you'd said when it started. Hey. Disney cartoon fans. Do you want Disney to make live action versions of cartoons?
They'd be like. Why would I want that? How would you even do it? Why would you do it? Surely the cartoons are better. More flexible.
They just decided to go insane and trash their own reputation.
And kept making ever more awful films and lowering the budget when they didn't work.
Didn't stop. Just lowered the budgets and put them on Disney Plus.
A large silent (on the internet) group of mostly families who go “oh it’s the thing like that other thing I can take the kids to see that! It’ll be a fun afternoon!” Who don’t really need something to be super good as long as it’s kinda enjoyable.
Hey! I know this isn’t related but can Schaffrillas please do a video on the Kirby final bosses ranking and see how that ends up? Just spreading the word.
after watching guillermo del toro’s pinocchio, the disney live action just feels like an insult
Del Toro’s adaptation is the TRUE live action remake of Pinocchio and no one will change me mind :)
@@KazuhaEientrue but it’s not live action
I'm still wondering if Disney deliberately said "Hey, let's throw away every lesson that the original teaches us! It'll be great!"
Hey! I know this isn’t related but can Schaffrillas please do a video on the Kirby final bosses ranking and see how that ends up? Just spreading the word.
@@emoji3266 that'd be cool ngl
It teaches you to judge people not by their outside, but by their inside.
@@EpicJoshua314 "It's not about what you look like on the outside, it's what's INSIDE that he can't stand!"
You know, the shark joke is particularly funny because, in the original Italian novel, it's a giant, monstrous dogfish/shark that eats Pinocchio and Geppetto, not a whale.
So…great white, basking, or some other shark?
@@jeffreygao3956 the book called it "Il Mostruoso Pescecane", it's like a giant shark, but Collodi is never clear about that.
Monstro the Whale was definitely a big misstep in the 1940 cartoon. Whales never did anything to deserve this kind of demonization.
I wouldn’t be sure about that. Ask Livyatan, Xiphiacetus, and pretty much any dolphin. They are real dangerous! Also, dolphins are foul mouthed. There isn’t anything fancy about that WORD!
@@imveryangryitsnotbutter I think it was as simple as just being more familiar with the people in America, because of the biblical tale of Jonas.
Had no idea that Disney remade their Pinocchio in live action and genuinely almost had a panic attack because I thought Del Toro's Pinocchio was apparently terrible
Frankly I don't care about Pinnochio at all. But given that THREE came out in short succession you bet your bridges I'm going yo see the only one that put in effort just to spite the other two! (Toro wins)
Now i wish you would made a new video called "Wow! The new Pinocchio movie is fantastic!" but for the guillermo del toro's one
It should be called "Why Guillermo del Toro's Pinocchio is a solid standalone adaptation"
Disney's Pinnochio was the very first movie I ever owned back when I was about five, and I was so proud. It was sumptuously colourful, cheerily whimsical, bone-chillingly terrifying and heartwarming. And this movie was made in 1940! Nearing a century old, and it still holds up remarkably well. It didn't need a remake. *No* vintage Disney movie needs a remake, because they'll never equal what came before.
Imagine it’s all thx to the movie that every1 stop think about WWII
I swear, it’s becoming more abundantly clear after every one of these “live action” installments that Disney doesn’t give a fuck anymore to the point where I’m questioning myself about how long it will be until the point where even hardcore Disney fans will get sick of these movies
That, hardcore Disney fans getting tired of this movies, is definitely not gonna happen. They're Disney hardcore fans, they will see everything Disney makes, no matter how horrible it is, until the end of time.
@@SenkaPress It is actually astonishing that they won't just scrape the bottom of the barrel, they flat out destroy it.
The length some people will go to defend this kind of crap is just... pathetic.
I don't think hardcore Disney fans will ever get tired. Even if the remakes are awful they'll keep eating it up until the end of time.
I've been done with Disney for a long time now. They've made it very clear that they couldn't care less about their reputation and the timeless movies that made them who they are today.
Not only do they disregard their old movies as no longer good enough, but they actively try to villify them as 'outdated' or 'problematic' material (Which in some cases, is true. Their WW2 propaganda for example.) Something that tickles the fancy of their zoomer audience.
We can't have bad things happen to our protagonists anymore, there's no room for growth, no room for lessons or morals, no room for character development arcs. No no no. That's too much for general audiences to handle.
All Disney cares about now is making watered down, easily digestible product- I mean 'movies' based on nostalgic IPs that ultimately leave no impact on the viewer and exist solely to make money and offend as few people as humanly possible.
As a result, you end up with empty shells of what were once masterpieces of film that will be forgotten just as quickly as they came out.
@@TheFoxFromSplashMountain
This. I USED to be a hardcore Disney fan. The past decade or so was them doing nothing but destroying not just their old movies with terrible LA remakes, but even their new animated movies with dogshit sequels that ruin the point of the original. It slowly eroded my faith in them until I just gave up entirely.
This is the worst era of Disney by far, and that's saying quite a bit. They own a borderline monopoly on media, yet there's zero reason to watch their garbage.
I would have never guessed the Disney Live-Action remake was bad. Thank you for telling me.
I love your profile and name lol 🙃
Thanks for the insight lamb from the hit game Cult of the Lamb
Hey! I know this isn’t related but can Schaffrillas please do a video on the Kirby final bosses ranking and see how that ends up? Just spreading the word.
the amount of spam bots in the replies is scary
The fact this movie used a gag from Shrek, for Pinocchio to get the key while he’s in the cage, should tell you everything about this movie.
They really should've used an actual physical prop/puppet for Pinocchio, particularly for when he was a static puppet and when he's being handled by someone because it's so blatantly obvious he's CGI, especially in the scene Geppetto picks him up, you can literally tell he isn't holding anything in his hands
That would be so much better! There’s actually a super gorgeous Jack Skellington puppet that Disney uses at their Halloween parties, and I’m disappointed they didn’t show off those cool skills here.
But they wouldn't ever do that because prop and practical effects workers are unionized and the cgi workers are easier to exploit...
it's weird that we live in a world where fruity pinocchio can have a more entertaining, if stupid, version of the same character than disney themselves
Nahh, the fruity pinocchio movie was downright boring except for those few gold lines
@@terrizoop3739 Like the one where he says "When can I leave on my own?"
Boring but at least it has more personality....?
@@Forsakenthesillyartist "I've got the whole worldussy" 😩✨💅
@@L16htW4rr10r Fruity Pinocchio had better gay rep than all of the Live-Action Disney movies combined.
The girl and her puppet who is HEAVILY IMPLIED to also be sentient would genuinely be a more interesting story. Imagine being this girl, your leg was terribly injured and you have to work for this horrible guy, and then you find and befriend this sentient puppet. She was a ballerina puppet who definitely couldn't stand on her own, so the two help each other dance again while keeping the SENTIENT PUPPET hidden from Stromboli, eventually taking over the caravan and driving away happily together. Now that sounds interesting.
Nah none of it make sense. They added the girl i bet to make some kind of point on representation since there are no females other than the fairy in the original story, and to add racial inclusion to the story. None of those additions made any sense because the original pinocchio is a metaphoric tale about self growth it has zero to do with representation and gender and discrimination and shit like that. Also pinocchio is literally a child the whole slightly romantic tension between the two puppets is incredibly cringe
@@user-ji8ll1qn6o
In 1940, the puppets “hitting on” Pinoke was meant to be unsettling
@@user-ji8ll1qn6onot only that but there's not explanation why this girl also has a sentient puppet. Unless bringing puppets to life is a regular thing with the blue fairy
@@user-ji8ll1qn6o at least on it-s own, that story sounds interesting. It needed it's own movie, not being trowed away in a bad remake
Pinocchio's CGI reminds me of Pixar's Tin Toy. And considering that was a CGI experiment in the late 80's, that's one heck of an underachievement.
The first problem with all these remakes is this: the beats are all there, but the rhythm is all off. The beat is the bare skeleton structure of the song. Rhythm is how the song is built on that structure. Film is the same way, but with scripts. If that skeletal structure is off kilter, then the entire thing is thrown off. You can only do so much with a bad script. Everything is THERE structurally. But it's the pacing that's throwing everything off. The donkey scene is a great example of completely missing the mark, as well as the stampede scene.
The second problem with the remakes, the ones that don't at least ATTEMPT to do new things, is that they hinge on your knowledge of the original to get that emotional payoff. BUT even THEN, the other problem within that, is they fast travel to the highlight vs having proper buildup. Like look at Nala reuniting with Simba, Aladdin's introduction song "One Jump Ahead", Mulan's Decision, the West Wing incident. The scenes start out fine, but as they go on it just fumbles entirely. You notice something just feels off. And that's why that payoff isn't there. Not just because you've seen it before, but because you feel like you missed the point. And the BUILDUP is what MAKES that highlight....A HIGHLIGHT. It's screenwriting 101.
Some of the remakes honestly aren't BAD, _Beauty and the Beast,_ _Aladdin,_ and _The Jungle Book_ are at least passible to good. They attempt to do new things, or in _The Jungle Book's_ case, is ENTIRELY DIFFERENT from the original animation. With movies like _Pinocchio_ ones that had BAD box office returns originally, ones that are pretty old from the 40s, 50s maybe 60s...The ones people aren't as familiar with perhaps...You'd think this would be a good opportunity for Disney to do something new with the story. They did it with _The Jungle Book_ and it worked.
Here's my advice to Disney since it's clear they're not gonna stop: take a REALLY old animated film, and upgrade it. Don't just do SOME new things to try and fix past criticisms cause then that might just create new problems. Don't just copy and paste. I'll keep repeating it: Live action and animation are ENTIRELY DIFFERENT MEDIUMS. Animation can do things live action can only dream of. Live action has limitations, but work around those. Get creative. Film is a visual medium, use that to your advantage.
“Hey now! There was a lot of logic and thought put into this post. Stop that! We’re trying to make money!”
- Disney, probably
The best live action remake is the Cinderella remake.
It adds to the original film’s story in a satisfying way, like giving Prince Charming a deeper character compared to the 1950 version. It also actually puts the live action/cgi to good use, giving a beautiful new take on Cinderella’s ballroom dress.
@@CGFillertext I will have to counter that with a disagree, because the ending is trash. And it kinda ruins the rest of the movie. In the original, SHE WORKS for her freedom. She bangs on the door, she pulls on the doorknob. She has her animal friends help. In the remake? SHE SPINS AROUND WHIMSICALLY ACCEPTING HER FATE TO REMAIN IN AN ABUSIVE A__ HOUSE. What.
What the fck. Walt would be insulted. Since that was his favorite story, as he felt a connection with Cinderella.
@@TheRibottoStudios didn’t she leave with the Prince and then the Tremaines flee the country never to return, though?
I'm not a film student, but everything you said about pacing is true. I found this out when I watched the Code Geass movies (basically, a bunch of episodes from a beloved anime spliced together with some scenes removed.) The story, animation, voice acting, was all the same. All that changed was the pacing. And that was enough to downgrade my favorite anime of all time into some mediocre junk.
It's gonna get much worse when the live-action Little Mermaid gets released.
Halley Bailey is not one of the major problems (though I think choosing/being chosen for that role is not a great jump start for an acting career), but I have a bad feeling that they will reduce Ariel's character into the same treatment like they did with Jasmine, Mulan, Belle, Aurora, and Cinderella.
Actually, Jasmine was pretty alright. Though I see what your getting at.
@@empresssk no but Disney loves to fck over their actors in the remakes
That the trailer proudly displays her over-singing the main line of the movie is . . . not a good sign.
Also all of the ocean it's displayed is bland and colorless.
the fact that they choose a black actress to play a redhead mermaid instead of literally doing a live action of Princess and the Frog just smells of corporative progressive bait like all those token gay characters that can be easily removed for the chinese release. They gonna half-arse a racism plot and will probably be as off-note as that orc movie with will smith.
@@RutraNickers black = woke
Squidward: "Can you stop making crappy live action remakes of your already fine animated films?"
Disney: "No."
Squidward: "Can you stop making crappy live action remakes of your already fine animated films?"
Disney: "No."
Squidward: "Can you stop making crappy live action remakes of your already fine animated films?"
Disney: "No."
Squidward: "Can't you say anything else but no?"
Disney: "Try asking again"
Squidward: "Can you stop making crappy live action remakes of your already fine animated films?"
Disney: "No."
Squidward: *Intense Rsge*
Hey! I know this isn’t related but can Schaffrillas please do a video on the Kirby final bosses ranking and see how that ends up? Just spreading the word.
@here is the full clip
Nice RickRoll
Shrek: For five minutes, could you not ruin our childhoods? FOR FIVE MINUTES!!
I miss 2D animated movies, I really do. Part of the reason I liked "The Princess and the Frog", plus sprinkle in a little Keith David and it makes anything a million times better.
Princess and the Frog is so fire
I like when Pinocchio saidIt’s “Pinnockin time” It made me so hyped that I started shouting and crying of happines
Not to mention Jiminy talking about getting all up in Pinocchios pin-ussy, I got so hhaarrdd 😩
Hey, hey
Hey, hey, hey, hey
Hey, hey, hey, hey
Your lipstick stains
On the front lobe of my left side brains
I knew I wouldn't forget you
And so I went and let you blow my mind
Your sweet moonbeam
The smell of you in every single dream I dream
I knew when we collided
You're the one I had decided who's one of my kind
Hey, soul sister
Ain't that Mr. Mister on the radio, stereo
The way you move ain't fair you know
Hey, soul sister
I don't wanna miss a single thing you do tonight
Hey, hey
Hey, hey, hey, hey
Hey, hey, hey, hey
Just in time
I'm so glad you have a one track mind like me
You gave my life direction
A game show love connection we can't deny
I'm so obsessed
My heart is bound to beat right out of my untrimmed chest
I believe in you, like a virgin you're madonna
And I'm always gonna wanna blow your mind
Hey, soul sister
Ain't that Mr. Mister on the radio, stereo
The way you move ain't fair you know
Hey, soul sister
I don't wanna miss a single thing you do tonight
The way you can cut a rug
Watching you is the only drug I need
So gangsta, I'm so thug
You're the only one I'm dreaming of
You see, I can be myself now finally
In fact, there's nothing I can't be
I want the world to see
You'll be with me
Hey, soul sister
Ain't that Mr. Mister on the radio, stereo
The way you move ain't fair you know
Hey, soul sister
I don't wanna miss a single thing you do tonight
Hey, soul sister
I don't wanna miss a single thing you do tonight
Hey, hey
Hey, hey, hey, hey
Hey, hey, hey, hey
Tonight
Hey, hey
Hey, hey, hey, hey
Hey, hey, hey, hey
Tonight
It's wooden time! 😏
@@reallyawesometitle7653 What the fuck.
@@hep_fulla_pep yes
When Pinocchio stoped to smell shit, that’s when I knew this was one of the worst things Disney has made in a while. Can they just stop being so safe and greedy?
exactly! that part made me cringe and i just knew how it will go on from there
First Lion King now this? What is it with the Disney remakes and shit?
@@jonathankent1517 Ikr I expect those jokes from illumination movies and short runtime low effort cartoons
B-but look at the fairy, look how brave, diverse and woke they are! What do you want more than that? So many silly woke people fall for this cheep stunt.
Lol, they did that just to get some publicity and to hide under the pretext that you're a racist if you don't like this lame movie.
@@julimibz how is that being racist ☠️? we didnt say anything about her race, we just think its lame that they added new characters so disney can have more movie runtime and didnt stick with the story. Lastly, what was with the “stuttering” ? We’re not roleplaying ☠️
There was a live action Pinocchio in '96 that was really weird in that way 90s movies were, ridiculously genuine and emotional, but it was actually quite beautiful in a strange and almost frightening way. The puppet was a complicated animatronic made by Jim Henson's company so it came across as really cool and interesting. It had a lot of practical effects that made it stand out, more than the CGI monstrosity that counts somehow as "live action" in Disney's eyes.
Edit: The whale was freaking great, also a totally practical set
And even if they still planned to cgi Pinocchio in they could’ve used a blank green screen puppet for Tom Hanks to grab
I grew up watching the 96 version, and I still go back and re-visit it. It's honestly a really good version imo. Weird that Rob Schneider is in it though
@@louweasel7903 LOL, true 😅
I second this, it actually did a few things BETTER than the remake:
1) While the lying nose is used as a "Chekhov's Gun", the scene at school still teaches Pinocchio that lying is bad because he refused to admit he hit Lampwick, him using the nose to get out of the whale happens MUCH LATER and it's more to show that Pinocchio has grown smarter and more resourceful, instead of him being a snarky sue who immediately takes advantage of the nose and not really learning anything about lying.
2) Oh yeah, Pinocchio gets expelled at school BECAUSE he was troublesome, not over some "fantastic racism" reason that is never flashed out or explored in this remake despite being something neither the book or the original 1940 film had.
3) ALL the villains get their comeuppance, unlike this remake where only Stromboli gets arrested but meanwhile the objectively WORSE and more evil Coachman and his Pleasure Island are left untouched and the Fox and the Cat are still karma Houdinis that get away with screwing over Pinocchio.
4) It's actually a good looking film with actors that look like they give a shit, instead of being OVERLY lit like this ugly sad mess of a Disney remake. Oh, and there's no toilet humor with Pinocchio stopping to observe poop on the street. (seriously, the 1940 film is a blueprint for greatness, and they added that in a "new and improved" remake. Fuck modern Disney XP)
@@DeepEye1994 You seriously hit the nail on the head. The Adventures of Pinocchio (1996) is a superior movie by far.
I also like how different it is from the disney one in terms of story. The main beats are the same but it feels like there’s so much more to it as well
4:32, as someone who unfortunately watched this movie. Pinocchio's transformation into a donkey is stopped because he said something like "i can't run away and join the circus with you! i have to save my father!!" and it just.... stops....? like ZERO tension, absolutely no struggle, just a throwaway line to solve what was supposed to be an important plotline. he speaks the entire time like it's a dora episode.
Because in the original movie, he didn't actually turn into a full on donkey-
He only grew some donkey ears and tail and boom that's it, you got yourself a wooden living donkey Puppet hybrid
But fr he never really turned into a full donkey in the original film
@@baldisbasics6387 I think it’s because Pinocchio, while he joined in the bad stuff the “stupid little boys” were doing at Pleasure Island like getting into brawls, vandalizing and smoking and drinking beer, he wasn’t as malicious or mischievous as the other boys, so he slowly transformed instead of instantaneously like Lampwick. I think the way a boy turns into a donkey, or jacka** , depends on how high their level of bad behavior is. If it’s really high, they completely transform and lose their voice, but if it’s low or medium, they slowly transform by just growing ears, tail and braying or even possibly having their heads change too. I think this could explain how there could be a few boys while completely transformed are able to still maintain their speaking abilities. This is just my theory or idea of how the magic of Pleasure Island works and how Pinocchio isn’t completely transformed and other boys completely transformed can still talk.
One of the worst things from this production is that I believe they even decided to do this because of Del Toro's movie, hence why we got 3 different Pinocchio movies in such a short amount of time. Disney being Disney most likely wanted to steal away the attention that the Del Toro's production would've gotten, yet it backfired so hilariously, as now people are anticipating how good his is going to be over the other 2 that have already been released to awful reception.
Here to comment after watching Del Toro’s movie, which FUCKS. Like seriously it blew the Disney remake one out of the water (low bar! But still! It is incredible!)
Thats one of the issues with stop motion animation. It takes so long that a bunch of shitty copycats can be made to cash in on the hype. Every one of Laika's movies has a bunch of copy cats. Missing link has Small foot, and a bunch more sasquach based films. Paranorman with Monster House. Stop motion just takes 3x as long to make then a cgi movie
@@funnyberries4017 fully valid but i feel like paranorman and monster house are pretty different movies, haven’t seen monster house in a while tho so i could be wrong
@@internetuser5104 Yeah same with Small foot and missing link. The outside world doesn't know the plot or story, all they know is the subject matter. Like Dreamworks saw Pixar was making a fish movie, and spat out Shark Tale as quick as they could. Pixar mentioned they had a movie called Newt about the last newt of it's species, so Bluesky jumped up and did it with birds in Rio. Antz was made to snipe a bugs life. Live action Jungle book was made to snipe mowgli.
It's just a lot easier to snipe a stop motion movie 'cause of the time constraints
@@funnyberries4017 Didn't Monster House come 6 years before Paranorman though?
I actually don’t get why Shaff called honest John a cgi abomination because his design and movement feels like the most natural thing here. The realistic fox face actually seemed to work pretty well, so mixed with a well intended effort from Key…idk I like it
i really loved their desgins! thats the only thing i liked from the movie tbh
@@young3961 "the ugly furry fandom cartoon fox" What do you mean by that? I have seen better design in the furry fandoms than the last disney movies XD
@@young3961 this line sounds like an indirect attack to the furry fandom rather than an actual comparison...
@@young3961 Aaah you mean the fursuits, no the designs themselves.
I mean if makes sence giving how expensive a custom fursuit is, instead of just using a generic base, but there are also realistic fursuits, they are just even more expensive ;-;
@@spicynoodles2742 why would you want to look like a real animal?
At some point you have to wonder if Disney hates its animation roots?
This saddens me.
it hates that it will never capture what it got right the first time
Nope, they loved it. They just lazy af. Why risked losing the fans with new IP when you can just recycled better old product with different variation of downgrades? Why bother with meaningful upgrades or even remakes if you can just copy shot-per-shot, essentially auto-plagiarism yourself? Hell, you now make double (or even more) the money. The family watched the new awful one, reminince the older one, and then watched the older one
This is why when the simcard phone provider that i used is no longer have Disney+ bundles in, i immediately uninstall my Disney+ app. Ain't no way i'm gonna give them any money
It definitely feels like they do.
@@ShatteredGlass916 Let’s be honest, I think corporate Disney only really loves their animated movies when they make a whole lot of money and are popular enough to sell. They don’t care about how good their movies are, they only care if they’re popular (or became popular). They just want the money…
I actually have an interesting relationship with Pinocchio, I read the book before watching the 1940 disney version. A lot more dark shit happened in the book, at one point the two animals literally hung Pinocchio on a tree and he almost died. It was traumatizing because I was like 8 when I read the book.
Anyways, the trauma this live action gave me was 100 times worse.
Well, I find no difference between the book and the animated film. They’re both equally traumatizing.
I am completely convinced that Disney is pushing out these live action remakes to renew their copyright of these characters without directly lobbying congress just based on the quality of the movies and how fast they've been announcing more new live action remakes.
Wow I’m curious to hear from a copyright attorney about how effective this strategy would be
I guessing that since they can’t control the rights to the animated films anymore maybe they are making the live action ones to control. They are completely different. The problem is nobody wants them.
The funniest part is that Pinnochio is a character anyone can use- I forget the term but basically Disney only has rights to their version, not anyone else’s. So this movie is entirely pointless either way.
I really liked when pinocchio said "IM GETTING MIXED BY THE ANDROIDS" truly a hilarious scene
Hey isn't that From Pinocchio 2000?
is that dbfz reference?
@@themilkman5237 It's a Rhymestyle/3 Idiots reference, to be more precise.
Hey! I know this isn’t related but can Schaffrillas please do a video on the Kirby final bosses ranking and see how that ends up? Just spreading the word.
I learned about Pinocchio from Del Toro four years ago and have been interested in the project ever since. I hope everything works out with him. The description sounds interesting
Hey! I know this isn’t related but can Schaffrillas please do a video on the Kirby final bosses ranking and see how that ends up? Just spreading the word.
disney then: we make art
disney now: we make cash grabs
The donkey turning scene is horrifing in the original, the way it needs to do. Just compare those 2 scenes back to back, the "live action" version is literally robbed from all emotional impact it could have had. Also, the bad guys not getting captured or anything in the original was very important, it shows that out there there is actual danger, bad people exist and they don't always get what they deserve, so you have to be carefull.
@No Name yup, the kids in this one did nothing wrong to turn into asses. They drink something that is known for nto having alcohol, break things that were given to thems to rbeak and enjoyed a day in a park. Its completelly devoid of any substance for the point of the story. Not to mention Pinoccio didn't even skiped school to get there
@No Name I agree with everything you said, a pirate's life for me am I right? xD
Technically, Stromboli in the original was the only one to get some comeuppance since Pinocchio escaped from the bird cage with the help of the Blue Fairy and lost his wooden star. Though, it probably isn’t going to be a major deal for Stromboli since he would just continue putting on his puppet shows without Pinocchio.
@@juanfisi yeah they were literally having root bear
Stromboli Keeps Disneying, Honest John And Gideon Keep Greedying, Monstro Dies, And The Coachman Keeps On Being Literal Satan
The movie made me laugh one single time. Right at the end when Tom Hanks 'dies'. Hearing Pinocchio sing 'When You Wish Upon a Star' and healing him with his magic tears quite literally made me burst out laughing. I have never watched anything so utterly ridiculous from Disney in my life!
For real I thought it was a parody of Flynn's resurrection scene from Tangled. I guess Disney ran out of ideas. 😂
im glad im not the only one lmao
yes I was actually quite disappointed by this part
@@anonview oh lol XD
@@anonview I literally turned to my mom after the film was finished and showed her the Flynn resurrection scene, flabbergasted about how they are plagiarizing from their own IPS
honestly, more than anything, i'm just upset that this movie and Pauly Shore's Pinocchio might steal the thunder from Guillermo del Toro's Pinocchio movie (the one that actually looks like it has heart and effort put into making it)
Dunno about that, it comes out in December, perfect for family outings
At least we have Guillermo Del Toro’s absolutely GORGEOUS looking stop motion version of Pinocchio to look forward to. That one genuinely looks like it’ll put a fresh spin on the story
I love Tom Hanks but as of recently, next to all of his casting choices ranged from questionable to straight up embarrassing
He's an old man and has made more than enough money to last him for the rest of his life, I think he doesn't really care that much anymore. Same principle as Patrick Stewart voicing the poop emoji in the emoji movie.
@@wolvepotter5858 Bot creators are putting the making fun of bots thing at the end of their spam replies to not have them get deleted. One of the spam accounts doing this I recognized from another vid where that message wasn't at the end.
Hey! I know this isn’t related but can Schaffrillas please do a video on the Kirby final bosses ranking and see how that ends up? Just spreading the word.
@@Gulliblepikmin Oh ok
My favorite part of the movie when when Pinocchio was when he said “It’s Pinocing time” and Pinocced all over Honest John. This was defiantly the movie ever.
I know this isn’t related but can Schaffrillas please do a video on the Kirby final bosses ranking and see how that ends up? Just spreading the word.
“What do I look like? A jackaş̵̨͖͕͉̱̲̠̗͉̿͝”
I laughed way too hard
Why are you censoring yourself in a RUclips comment? Jackass.
I gotta admit, the random pictures of Tamatoa is funny especially this one: 6:24
I'm so glad that critics finally caved in and realized how bad these live action Disney movies really are
I hope Disney starts to take some notes
Not sure why you have to describe it as "caved in," they just simply didn't like it, which likely is the result of fatigue from these remakes.
Hey! I know this isn’t related but can Schaffrillas please do a video on the Kirby final bosses ranking and see how that ends up? Just spreading the word.
Yeah turning red was so bad i blew up a diary queen
What do you mean by "finally"? It's not like this is the first time Disney has been criticized for their awful live action movies.
The only good thing about the Pinocchio remake is that its making people realize how fantastic the original is. It's arguably Disney's best movie from an art and animation perspective. The story might be a bit weak, like you said, but I think it still works for what it is. It's only their second movie ever, so I can't entirely fault them for sticking to an episodic format like they did with Snow White.
We didn't need a remake to know that. Disney is just a company of money sluts.
I have the bluray.
The story is absolutely not weak, it's one of the only stories that is audacious enough to tackle morality and the consequences of making bad decisions.
To be fair, the original Carlo Collodi novel wasn’t a linear narrative. It was also very episodic with Pinocchio getting to shenanigans due to his naivety or lack of common sense or a conscience and learning a lesson from each one. So the 1940 film is true to the plot format of the book, even if it isn’t as violent or sadistic as some of the moments that happen to Pinocchio when he gets into those shenanigans.
Also, it made Del Toro’s version, (and even Pauly Shore’s version) better
i actually really liked the way they did Honest John. i think he looks great and he's expressive, and in a world where a puppet can walk and there's a humanoid cricket and a giant whale monster and people can turn into donkeys and magic is definitely real, an anthropomorphic fox doesn't feel any more out of place than the ones in the 2d animated version
He looks cursed and I think it works
He was the only thing in the movie that I really liked
@@kitkatboard LOL Not at all, Honest Fox doesn't look "cursed" at all, he looks expressively fun and animated completely that WORKS in live action, the hate against him is completely invalid entirely.
5:12 Sebastian and Tamatoa should meet up
5:57 that Sounds so bad. How did that audio make it into a professional film made by the biggest film studio in the world. That sounds like when the audio cuts out on a discord call
The sad thing is I strangely find the unnecessary puppet girl cute and think her relationship with Pinocchio and how she communicates with him with her own puppet is kind of adorable. If only she actually had a purpose. What if she decided to go with him to save Geppeto? What if there was a scene with her standing up to Stromboli and saying she'll find her own way to become a successful puppeteer? Seriously, why is she here? So Zemeckis could expand that weird Scrooge scene from the Polar Express? To make this less of a lying nose fest? I mean, sure, aside from Cleo and The Blue Fairy, most of the main characters are dudes, but we all know how good Disney Live Action remakes are at empowering. This gal isn't as bad as the other live action portrayals of characters that already exist, because at least this one has something of a persona, but at least the boring versions of Disney heroins that are actually interesting did stuff.
Hey! I know this isn’t related but can Schaffrillas please do a video on the Kirby final bosses ranking and see how that ends up? Just spreading the word.
From Pinocchio's puppety point of view, she's like one of those alien shapeshifter girls who plays at being human. Then gets a taste for it.
The "Catfish with a heart of gold" trope.
They are usually adults or teenagers though.
The girl and her puppet result in Stromboli being arrested, something which did not happen in the original. So with that their appearance is not entirely unnecessary.
Maybe the character looks neat and some ideas could work in a modern setting, but it completely defies the logic of the original book.
In the original Pinocchio's story has weight because the world around him is very hostile, the guards would've NEVER sided with a kid(if im not mistaken the puppets were basically owned by Stromboli in the books) especially with such a wealthy individual that could've easily bribed them to be left alone.
She's the token feminist character that they shove into every live action movie. She's just there to say "girl power" and peace out.
The horror never ends.
So baby now you feel like number one
Are you talking about bad live action remakes or bad Pinocchio films?
Hey! I know this isn’t related but can Schaffrillas please do a video on the Kirby final bosses ranking and see how that ends up? Just spreading the word.
Hello, Schaf! I know you don’t know me personally, but there’s something I want to tell you: PLEASE make a review, even a short one, of Guillermo Del Toro’s Pinocchio movie! The way it is adapted is absolutely phenomenal! It somehow told a story where it completely changed the format, like the time it takes place in, yet handled its source material with an immense amount of love and respect! It actually expands on the characters, the settings, and the themes of the original in a way that would make Disney jealous! Seriously, it feels like you are watching Laika at the top of its game!
I just saw it and it was absolutely beautiful!! The director wasn't scared to make Pinocchio and his father somewhat unlikable and likable with flaws and redeeming qualities. And not to mention the cricket was my favorite 8/10
*Insert a do it- gif here*
Ikr, please make a review of that, more people need to know about the Good Pinocchio Movie
@@kurema7264, I don’t blame you for loving the cricket. Despite his differences in character and role, he still managed to prove he had whimsy and profound wisdom. But for me, I really, really loved Pinocchio himself! Oh my gosh, his expressions and movements are so fluid! The fact that simple changes with his eyes or mouth could exhibit so much emotion is baffling! And his defiant, lively nature, along with his voice, made him feel so much like that of a real kid!
@@emmagaroutte9211 I'm really glad we got Del Toro's Pinocchio, it more than makes up for this soulless live action remake. I've joked that Disney's remake was soulless because Del Toro took all the heart for his remake, lol, because there's just so much passion and love poured into that film.
I mostly agreed with this, but I love that CGI fox so much. Him and the cat looked a lot better to me than the rest of the animals in the movie. Then again, I liked the Christmas Carol movie you listed under "CGI abominations" so maybe our tastes are just different in that department.
The furries at disney who made the fox did a good job
There was definitely a clash of art styles with the CG. Some of them took the realistic route while others went for more cartoony looks. It’s like there was no synergy in the art direction, and as a result, everything feels weird and wonky
I'm a huge fan of the 2009 Christmas Carol
Yeah, Christmas Carol felt so surreal looking as a child. Especially the part where Scrooge talks to this spirit of light thingy, like damn it was mesmerizing lmao I loved it
I love the fox aswell.
as someone who genuinely loves the original Pinocchio (as in it's my favorite animated movie of all time), i found the remake insulting. it somehow completely missed all of the beauty and subtlety of the original while adding extra scenes, dialogue, characters, and story beats that are both completely unecessecary and, at times, counteract some of the most important themes of the movie. i hated every second of it because it's not like the Lionsgate Pinocchio where you could tell that they were just trying to cash in on the Pinocchio name; it was made by Disney, and yet it completely misunderstood every part of what made the original Pinocchio so great.
1/10. i seriously hate it.
they didn't even censor the jackass line well, i think i genuinely would've preferred a censor beep lmao
And yet they censored the beer?!
@@mackroone2854 yeah like the original movie was one of my favorites as a kid and i've never had beer or smoked, except for one time just out of curiosity but immediately hated it and didn't want it anymore lol and the jackass line is so funny/creative imo so i hoped they'd include it but this definitely wasn't the way to do so
Yeah it sounds like a glitch
Yet They Removed Beer and Smoking??
Hey! I know this isn’t related but can Schaffrillas please do a video on the Kirby final bosses ranking and see how that ends up? Just spreading the word.
Disney Pinocchio:🤓
DreamWorks Pinocchio (Shrek):🗿🍷
My favorite part of the video was in the sponsor segment when Schaff said "It's Surf Sharkin time!". Truly one of the sponsors ever.
Hey! I know this isn’t related but can Schaffrillas please do a video on the Kirby final bosses ranking and see how that ends up? Just spreading the word.
am i the only that feels disney plus has somehow made disney more lazier with their content??
fr
Regarding the overblown brightness of the town: one thing that always bothered me about the live action remakes has been how dark and gloomy the lighting is in nearly every scene, and I'm not alone in thinking that. I wonder if the creators took those criticisms to heart and just cranked up the brightness to overcompensate.
I know this isn’t related but can Schaffrillas please do a video on the Kirby final bosses ranking and see how that ends up? Just spreading the word.
2:35 Is this an actual scene in the movie?? I litterally spit out coffee. good grief.
Even though Pinocchio was pretty bad, a part of me wants Disney to rush through all of the Live Action Remakes so we can get the Live Action Cars Movie just to see how they make it worse.
I loved Cars as a kid, and I still do today (even though I think Cars 2 sucked, and Cars 3 was just OK). I don’t need a live action remake of my favorite Pixar movie of all time.
What would even change? More realistic landscapes? There aren’t any humans at all.
I know this isn’t related but can Schaffrillas please do a video on the Kirby final bosses ranking and see how that ends up? Just spreading the word.
When you have to CGI most of the main characters to look like their original animated form, maybe a live action version just wasn't meant to be
i’ve been so hyperfocused on guillermo del toro’s pinocchio coming out this year i completely forgot disney shit this movie out
If Del Toro’s Pinocchio movie is shit I’m going to commit a war crime
When i was like 4 or 5, I had a nightmare, where I was hanging out with Jiminy Cricket at playground, only that Jiminy was not his usual cartoony self, but a realistic and a literal cricket, with a top hat and a suit.
This movie's Jiminy Cricket looks worse than that nightmare Jiminy Cricket
1:01 You know something's bad when he says "One of the most boring movies I've seen in quite some time" right after an Illumation marathon
Every daytime, outdoor shot looks so overexposed. Like someone accidentally moved the sun a little too close to the Earth and Pinocchio’s gonna burst into flames at any second.
Maybe the sun searing the land, drying it to dust, is a metaphor for the drought of ethics at Disney that’s at the root of all these soulless remakes.
Bankai Rujin Jakka
I know this isn’t related but can Schaffrillas please do a video on the Kirby final bosses ranking and see how that ends up? Just spreading the word.
@@emoji3266 i know this isn't related but can he also make a video about the Bleach manga or anime? Especially with the anime getting a new arc after 10 years
@@legendaresn6983 add that to the list of things Schaffrillas needs to make videos on.
There’s already a live action film for Pinocchio in 1996 and it was absolutely amazing. The donkey scene in that one was genuinely terrifying.
There's a billion of them
@@ChangedMyNameFinally69 but they should have stopped at 1996
@@ottz2506 Nah I'm fine with fairy tales be reinterpreted over the years. It's wrong to police what people make in fiction if it's harmless enough. People also said the 2018 one was good.
@@ChangedMyNameFinally69 Sometimes some films and shows just don’t need to be redone as shown with this new adaptation because it seems like there’s a general trend in which adaptations get more and more terrible the more you try and remake them. There are times when people just have to say “okay we’ve done enough now. We’ve got some good stuff already so let’s move on.”
@@ottz2506 Well one only four years earlier was good. And Del Toro's will atleast be interesting. Don't know why we've gotten three Pinocchio movies in one year though
7:30 Did Pinocchio REALLY just sniff sh*t!? 0_-
Fun fact: in the original Italian book Pinocchio was actually eaten by a shark (literally dogfish in Italian), not a whale. Disney changed it in the animated movie because they were afraid the shark scare would have affected negatively any seaside business in the US.