Sadly, I'm pretty sure Joe Biden has already kicked the bucket. They used a recording of his voice the other day and forged his signature. Not looking good.
@popfoot7965....kind of strange that the same week this happened to Trump, Biden disappears with "covid" only to be replaced by Harris. Makes you wonder if someone didn't want Harris to have to run against Trump....
I'd like to know who ordered the hit, and recruited the patsy.? it seems that the huge movements by the tall kid, on that shallow pitched roof for all to see, was just a distraction, to cover the other real marksman, ,,where ever he was perched..? IDK
This is the pertinent question that needs investigating. The shooter knew. The question is who told him? And since only so many people within the SS even had the information it shouldn't be hard to figure out.
@@grth3929it was pretty obvious. Saw that they were understaffed. He’s loitering around and no one made contact with him. Saw the tree would occlude him from the secret service snipers. Doesn’t take a genius to out smart these bozos.
Why would you put a person guarding a 6'3 and 250lbs guy with 5'6 and 120lbs person?????? Why would you allow someone who can't holster their gun to guard a president??????
There is no excuse for the POOR defense he had. Was she brave? Sure.. All of them where brave and did their best in spite of being the wrong people for the job.. But the leadership or lack thereof is to blame 100%
@@Napster60 Dude, she Cowered when he the assassin was shooting, covering her own head, five feet away from Trump. The Only people that did their job was the Men on the close protection team, everyone else needs to be Fired yesterday.
The girls want to prove how they can do everything a man can do. This is akin to men playing in women’s sports. Girls fail, but the men clean up in women’s sports. Bravo DEI hires
I don't know if you watched all of the hearing today, but one of the congressmen asked about DEI and if that was used in hiring for Trumps Secret Service. Then another congress woman blasted about how we needed DEI, and the congressman was being racist against women and blacks. It's just crazy. If they had put a tall woman, things might have looked different.
This whole situation is mind boggling. I’m so angry and sick about it. A person died and 3 people injured, two severely. All needlessly. People were shouting about the threat to no avail. Fire her already!
Corey Comperatore is the man who died shielding his family. He was a former fire chief and was honoured in Trump's RNC speech. One of the guys critically injured had first name David can't remember the other person. @@Bugsy0333
@@barryflanagan6665 Ease up on the dumb names. They're politicians. Like us, they have strengths and weaknesses. They are simply a representation of us and our values. Just because some dude wears a red shirt, or a blue shirt, and spouts a lot of political crapola, doesn't change who he is in his mind and his heart.
@@barryflanagan6665 really?So wasn't the Democratic party the ones who lied for 3 years about the border crisis and then 4 years about how "Cogent" and sharp Joe Biden is?
It is hard to remember a more dangerous time for this level of incompetence. I keep seeing people wonder if this was deliberate…I am trying to NOT think that is the case.
@@J.Freeman-t4p Think about this, she will have a report in 60 days! Meanwhile, all the people the SS are "protecting" are being provided this level and quality of protection. Or is this level of incompetence only reserved for Trump? Scary and dangerous times.
Remember everyone! She is not the only one responsible here. She was not even on the ground the day of the event. We need to find out who else was in on this!
The DEI's she hired. She has the same boss as Mayorkas. That's why we're getting the same attitude from her she knows she's not going to get fired and she doesn't have to step down with Jill and Joe's backing!
She’s the leader who gives order . The sniper said that he can’t wait for her any longer so he did shot the shooter . Somehow she’s taking her time that she wants Trump get shot ? She is lying. Fired her or impeach . Don’t let her resign. Fired that she deserves.
If ANYTHING seemed out of place, WHY WAS TRUMP ALLOWED ON THE STAGE IN THE FIRST PLACE??? RULE NUMBER 1 - IF ANYTHING SEEMS AMISS, DON'T LET ANYONE ON THE X.
He didn't "amiss" that poor father though...😡 You're spot on, how the hell was he even able to get on that roof is the question and nobody is answering it.
She is totally in line with ALL JB nominees, ALL nominees in EVERY department & cabinet. This whole adm. is rotten to the core, totally. That is how DEI works.
I agree. And now this woman has resigned. And who is this guy that has replaced her? Someone with plausible deniability I assume. I just watched a video on Jimmy Dore with Whitney Webb which raised even more concerns for me about Trump and especially JD Vance let alone these government agencies. I am so disheartened.
No. She doesn't want a bullet in her head and she plays the game and that's it. She knew that she had to go through these stupid 'hearings'. Everything was planned. And nobody is gonna tell you anything at all.
A similar security and risk control failure happen with the Apollo missions when in 1970, NASA diversified their forces, it got so bad that NASA had to shut down the whole project. Quotas don't work, excepts never.
I dont know of any hearings that ever achieved anything. She's lying, evading and still getting paid... and the house doesnt have the power to do anything about it, so why even put on this show?
At least the exposure should tell the people that Jill's appointee and company should be voted out and replaced in November. We're seeing dirty laundry aired, at least that's something. Also for the first time in 4 years, there is at least some bipartisan agreement. She will definitely not be staying at her job for long.
It's like the Epstein shenanigans all over again. "We record all radio comms." "Oh, so you have them for the assassination attempt." "No... the recorders weren't working that day...."
EXACTLY because it was set up. They said that 20 year old had 3 encrypted offshore accounts 😒 I don’t know if that’s true I heard it on you tube news I think
$4k a month…my husband gets that from local PD. I’m sure we are funding a lot more than that. She needs to be fired and pension revoked for her gross negligence and criminal neglect.
So basically he was still “suspicious” holding a rifle aiming at the podium, but a “threat” only seconds before the shots were fired. If he was a threat, those shots should not have been allowed to be fired!
I would expect myself to be able to know the operations well enough (as a 29 year veteran) to be able to see IMMEDIATELY where, who, and why the failure occurred. THATS THE WAY PEOPLE USED TO OPERATE.
You could safely bet your house she was wearing an earpiece and repeating answers from her superiors. Her hair covered her left ear throughout the entire proceeding.
yeah, its almost as though he had to wait till the patsy fired first.... because if the counter sniper that "waited for the ok" took out the patsy (before) the patsy fired, then the real marksman wouldn't be able to follow through with his hit.(where ever he was perched?) . I'm sure after Trump went down, they thought they accomplished what they wanted.. but when the patsy was killed, the real marksman couldn't give himself away by firing anymore shots .. IDK , just another theory . we're getting no answers. so we might as well, look at all possibilities right.. like watching a who done it triple agent spy movie. This is unacceptable. People need to be held accountable..!
I also wondered if the ss held their guns towards the “shooter” and waited for him to shoot Trump, then they killed the shooter, from being questioned by authorities…..I’m sure he was “promised” to be paid, not killed. Common sense is not conspiracy theory. Putting two and two together is not conspiracy theories.
Jail jail jail jail jail, how is this possible that the director effectively say I don’t know and I will not answer, and waste everyone’s time and congress can’t do a thing about it? I don’t understand why we even bother with this process
And send her pension to the family of the man that died and the two that were injured on her watch! Such complete incompetence, lying, and stonewalling, she is evil.
Just my two (hundred?) cents, the director answers every question as though she's just a stooge; a yes-ma'am who tells people what to do because she's told what to tell them to do, and thus doesn't actually see herself as responsible, no matter how much she claims she is taking responsibility. That's how in one breath she can claim responsibility, then finish her sentence with "I don't have any explanation or answers for anything." I'm not implying there's a conspiracy behind her, I'm simply using the old Sherlock Holmes method of deductive reasoning: "Take away the impossible, and whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth." Let's say she has been ordered by someone or some agency with the authority to do so that she cannot disclose any information contained within an ongoing federal investigation; if that's the case, while she then would be unable to disclose that information, she could still simply say "I cannot disclose any information about an ongoing federal investigation that might compromise that investigation, were it to be made publicly available before the investigation had reached its conclusion." Notice, however, the answers she does give, repeatedly, over and over and over again. "I'm asking those questions myself." "That is something the FBI would have to tell you." "It's part of an investigation." "I don't have that in front of me right now." "I don't want to disclose communications with my subordinates." What do all of these have in common? They're completely empty, devoid of any substance, smoke and mirrors. Worse than not providing an answer, they provide what I like to call "less than an answer". This is because, instead of providing clarity, these responses all add more questions, such as "why?" The event has already come and gone, which means everything that needed to be decided, such as the perimeter, is in the past, the event has happened, so all those details are set in stone and not subject to change. Those are facts. There is absolutely no reason why, over a week later, she should still be "asking those questions", they had a perimeter, it was decided on whether it was good or bad, and the information about it exists, so there is absolutely no reason why the director of the agency should not instantly have that answer provided to her and ready to present at a hearing. "Why?" If it's impossible for her to be unable to gain this information, being, as she is, the director of the agency, and thus should have access to nearly every detail (after all, she claims she spoke to the counter-sniper herself), we must move on to what is improbable. It is very improbable that she is so utterly incompetent, or powerless and without respect by her own subordinates, that, in more than a week, she would still be unable to obtain basic information about one of the most egregious security breaches in the agency's history; if this is true, that means she is either catastrophically incompetent by means of being completely unaware of what basic information she should be asking for (and thus unfit for her post), or completely lacking the power and authority within her own agency, over her own subordinates, to get them to provide her with the most basic information (and thus, unfit for her post.) Either of these two paints her as an extremely incapable leader over an agency considered to be so important; it means she is in a position where, before a congressional hearing, at which she was present only because she was under a subpoena, she, as the person nominally in charge of the actions of the secret service, has no information or apparently no way to get it expedited to her, either of which in turn paints the agency itself as completely incompetent and untrustworthy. So is she just a figurehead with no power, no authority, no actual oversight over the actions of her underlings, leaving them free to do whatever they feel like doing with the billions of dollars their agency receives, or has she really fumbled as unbelievably monumentally as her responses make her appear to have done? Again, all she'd have to do, whether it was satisfactory or not, would be to say "that set of details is currently classified as part of a federal investigation that would be jeopardized if the information was released to the public prior to the close of the investigation." Sure, this takes it out of her immediate hands so that she wouldn't have to answer, but it provides an answer to "why?" A professional in any agency, industry, business, line of work, or whatever else, especially one at the very top of their organization, should never have a good reason to obfuscate an answer so much that it leaves people wondering why you feel so deathly compelled to obfuscate. It implies worse than incompetence, it implies worse than ignorance, it implies even worse than trying to cover up for an honest mistake or set of honest mistakes. It suggests fundamentally unsettling implications regarding where she really fits in the chain of command within our government; who answers to her, and who does she answer to? She claims the buck stops with her and that she will be taking responsibility, but the only thing she has shown when being asked to actually step up to the responsibilities she claimed she would be taking is an immovable desire to redirect, deflect, and skirt around practically every single question. 29 years in the agency, she says? Worked her way up through the ranks, she says? Doesn't that imply that she has an incredible wealth of knowledge, understands much of what the agency is responsible for from top to bottom from having been there, and likely has every necessary connection to ensure all of those elements work well? Surely achieving her lofty status after such a long and illustrious career implies that she couldn't be incompetent, and surely not so powerless that she has no functional authority over her minions. I feel like we should be able to comfortably write off these two possibilities as 'impossible', but there is unfortunately the specter of her own stance on forcing "diversity" into her agency; maybe she really is that incompetent and got the job on a recommendation or something instead of actual merit and capability, or maybe she really doesn't have any power at all. Both of these possibilities would be remedied by her immediate dismissal or resignation, and replacement with a competent, capable, intelligent, resourceful, and well-informed successor. Unfortunately, *again*, that means the final two categories of possibility remain just that; possible. Those two, "Really bad" and "Worse", I probably would not be considered "within my freedom of speech to say", as it were. I'm sure they're self-evident at this point and that I shouldn't have to put myself in jeopardy to state them.
Let me get this right. She was director of the secret service for less than two years. The fine people at the rally should take her job. They were more competent and aware of the threat than her hire-a-cop. Rest in peace Cory ✨️ 🕊
Local law enforcement said they werent allowed in the command room. So by her admission they had no communication with local law enforcement as they used a separate radio channel. Wow.
Surprised she didn’t send the TSA. If she were a CEO of a company that was negligent and cost a life because of that negligence, she would be sued into oblivion, BUT as a government employee, FAILURE is always an option when there are no repercussions. Resigning, guess the father that died protecting his family would have liked to walk away. Disgusting
These hearings should be held out of public eye for security reasons. If proceedings prove someone acted wrongly then the employer should reprimand those who failed to provide perimeter/roof coverage. Learn from mistakes.
Good questions raised why she’s not using her experience to get to the bottom of things urgently wanting 60 days sounding like she’s almost passively involved taking in info. It’s bad.
I would like to replace her, I have NO idea what the secret service does but evidently the director doesn't need to! So that makes me absolutely qualified!
Lol, she's not a Republican. Bannon and Navarro served prison time for contempt of Congress while 15 members of Biden's administration are currently in contempt of Congress. Only one side is ever prosecuted.
After being bombarded with so many questions, its amazing how tolerant the committee is, as the Secret service director she doesn't have any paper nor. data to proof nor prepare her answers this is absolutely unacceptable! Its such a clear cut answer that the Americans should have a rude awakening and call its almost a walk over for Trump camp
Right? If we where under oath we'd be made to give an answer. She can't dance around all the answers and everything is fine. I'm not even American and this is an absolute disgrace and it makes me sick
It's an on going lying fest to deceive ....darn I was so naive growing up...i.m surprised mayorkas and several others aren't seated around her in a circle...
In those "seconds" before the first shot that SS knew he was a threat, what did they do? Who specifically knew? Did the counter-sniper know? Should have asked follow-up questions. And what actions did the SS take when they knew he was suspicious? Did they keep track of him?
Should of demanded she place the pen down out of her hands, she’s using it as a coping mechanism to hide anxiousness. She would have been considerably more flustered if this would of happened.
"Maby when the President wakes up from his nap, he'll fire you".......................SAVAGE!
😅👍
Ikr
🤣🛌
Sadly, I'm pretty sure Joe Biden has already kicked the bucket. They used a recording of his voice the other day and forged his signature. Not looking good.
savage😎
She won't answer questions because she did EXACTLY what she was paid to do. Traitor.
@popfoot7965....kind of strange that the same week this happened to Trump, Biden disappears with "covid" only to be replaced by Harris. Makes you wonder if someone didn't want Harris to have to run against Trump....
COACHED and REHEARSED by mayorkas!!
Disconnected, couldn't care less; giving those vague answers in a flat tone of voice like a robot lol
She Just a Puppet for those behind
Treason has a very specific consequence.
This is insane. Lock this traitor up
Na just fire her and black-list her
How can she be a traitor when she was the enemy to begin with 😈
@@lottji She plotted an assassination on the president, she deserves prison.
@@lottji Since when “na “ became a word ?
@@lottji No, a man died. People were shot. She should be in prison.
He became a threat when he missed, just not to Trump.
Exactly. So they silenced him immediately.
Dead men tell no tales, right Mayorkas??
@@johnmarshall3903 Something about that last name has me heading to Wackipoodia to verif.....yep.....just as I thought.
He didn’t missed, if trump head won’t turned he would be dead man
true
Lock her up already
Haha you can't. Impossible
It’s fascinating how this 20yo knew all these mistakes were about to happen.
I'd like to know who ordered the hit, and recruited the patsy.? it seems that the huge movements by the tall kid, on that shallow pitched roof for all to see, was just a distraction, to cover the other real marksman, ,,where ever he was perched..? IDK
This is the pertinent question that needs investigating. The shooter knew. The question is who told him? And since only so many people within the SS even had the information it shouldn't be hard to figure out.
Guess asking the visitors he had from Washington in the week preceding the attempt will answer lots of questions.
Yep knew that building was perfect, no watch, no one up there, makes no sense why it would be safe for him, but he knew
@@grth3929it was pretty obvious. Saw that they were understaffed. He’s loitering around and no one made contact with him. Saw the tree would occlude him from the secret service snipers. Doesn’t take a genius to out smart these bozos.
Why would you put a person guarding a 6'3 and 250lbs guy with 5'6 and 120lbs person?????? Why would you allow someone who can't holster their gun to guard a president??????
There is no excuse for the POOR defense he had. Was she brave? Sure.. All of them where brave and did their best in spite of being the wrong people for the job.. But the leadership or lack thereof is to blame 100%
@@Napster60 Dude, she Cowered when he the assassin was shooting, covering her own head, five feet away from Trump. The Only people that did their job was the Men on the close protection team, everyone else needs to be Fired yesterday.
The girls want to prove how they can do everything a man can do.
This is akin to men playing in women’s sports.
Girls fail, but the men clean up in women’s sports.
Bravo DEI hires
@@dianewilkins4418YOU FAIL BBBBB!!!
I don't know if you watched all of the hearing today, but one of the congressmen asked about DEI and if that was used in hiring for Trumps Secret Service. Then another congress woman blasted about how we needed DEI, and the congressman was being racist against women and blacks. It's just crazy. If they had put a tall woman, things might have looked different.
This whole situation is mind boggling. I’m so angry and sick about it. A person died and 3 people injured, two severely. All needlessly. People were shouting about the threat to no avail. Fire her already!
What is the name of the person that died ? And the names of the people injured ? They never want to mention this how sad is that ?
@@Bugsy0333 They mentioned it a couple times but most of the time they try too avoid it.
Corey Comperatore is the man who died shielding his family. He was a former fire chief and was honoured in Trump's RNC speech. One of the guys critically injured had first name David can't remember the other person. @@Bugsy0333
We have a secret service agent or agents that are carrying out assisination attempts on former presidents. Thats the only way all of this adds up
👍......💯 percent !
How dare anyone suggest that CHEATles be fired?? She is to be put on trial and given prison time for such gross incompetence!
She should be jailed for life for being complicit in this crime
Trump should sue her!
Because a man was killed and 3 men were almost killed! That's 3 counts of attempted murder!
This woman caused death of a civilian and injured people too
She probably get immunity, like the president.
Nobody from this administration is accountable....Same old Democratic song and dance....
If Trump wins and Republicans get the house and senate with ACTUAL conservatives that will change.
Same old...
We could say the same about the redumbican s
@@barryflanagan6665 Ease up on the dumb names. They're politicians. Like us, they have strengths and weaknesses. They are simply a representation of us and our values.
Just because some dude wears a red shirt, or a blue shirt, and spouts a lot of political crapola, doesn't change who he is in his mind and his heart.
@@barryflanagan6665 really?So wasn't the Democratic party the ones who lied for 3 years about the border crisis and then 4 years about how "Cogent" and sharp Joe Biden is?
this woman is a horrible leader of the ss.. fire her NOW !!! STOP PAYING her, she is a FAILURE
Fire her and charge her for back pay which is the people’s tax money
They can't fire her. The President can but will not.
+ no benefits packages
It is hard to remember a more dangerous time for this level of incompetence. I keep seeing people wonder if this was deliberate…I am trying to NOT think that is the case.
@@J.Freeman-t4p Think about this, she will have a report in 60 days! Meanwhile, all the people the SS are "protecting" are being provided this level and quality of protection. Or is this level of incompetence only reserved for Trump? Scary and dangerous times.
And she insisted that she was the best person to hold her position, how ruthless can you be
That female punch bag must be arrested
*exxxxekuted
Cheatle? cheating? betrayel?
Remember everyone! She is not the only one responsible here. She was not even on the ground the day of the event. We need to find out who else was in on this!
There's always a bigger fish
The DEI's she hired. She has the same boss as Mayorkas. That's why we're getting the same attitude from her she knows she's not going to get fired and she doesn't have to step down with Jill and Joe's backing!
She’s the leader who gives order . The sniper said that he can’t wait for her any longer so he did shot the shooter . Somehow she’s taking her time that she wants Trump get shot ? She is lying. Fired her or impeach . Don’t let her resign. Fired that she deserves.
More excueses
@paulstar235zsbhe should have been there it was her job1
"You should resign or maybe when the President wakes up from his nap, he'll fire you." SNAP!
fabulous summarization. round of applause for you sir
Apparently it is more dangerous for her to answer questions than to not answer them, and THAT should be worrying.
That is why she isn't answering.
This is painful, like the entire experience of the Biden administration.
If ANYTHING seemed out of place, WHY WAS TRUMP ALLOWED ON THE STAGE IN THE FIRST PLACE??? RULE NUMBER 1 - IF ANYTHING SEEMS AMISS, DON'T LET ANYONE ON THE X.
They wanted Trump DEAD!
I totally agree, as we saw, they endangered all.
GOAT
He didn't "amiss" that poor father though...😡 You're spot on, how the hell was he even able to get on that roof is the question and nobody is answering it.
"If there's ANY doubt, there's NO DOUBT" as the saying goes.
Hurry Up November 5th
Trump 2024
Great comment. Lol. Couldn't agree more
👍
Then a long 2 and a half mouths till Jan. 20th.
She is totally in line with ALL JB nominees, ALL nominees in EVERY department & cabinet. This whole adm. is rotten to the core, totally. That is how DEI works.
Yet everyone stump put around him are now serving time. 😂😂😂😂
@@barryflanagan6665 thats not an argument at all lmao
But blanket, unsupported accusations are, I suppose?
@@barryflanagan6665
Who is Stump?
@@surpriseimblack you got a picture of him.
Her replies are sickening… How can anyone trust a governmental agency anymore?
You mean there are people who ever trusted a government entity?
I agree. And now this woman has resigned. And who is this guy that has replaced her? Someone with plausible deniability I assume. I just watched a video on Jimmy Dore with Whitney Webb which raised even more concerns for me about Trump and especially JD Vance let alone these government agencies. I am so disheartened.
Fauci, jb, etc etc etc
Trust ? Haha...
She will be rewarded by the powers that be for her evasiveness
soros bonus package.
I am not sure but if she was found criminally negligent in an attempted assassination she would be life in fed with no parole at least.
She gets to live.
@@margaretcrawford8316 unless she is found to have taken part in the assassination and it becomes treason.
The Deep State are telling her to keep her mouth shut. She is a traitor
There is something deeply wrong with this woman.
Yeah she's deepstate and she's been arrested going to gitmo and tribunal
No. She doesn't want a bullet in her head and she plays the game and that's it. She knew that she had to go through these stupid 'hearings'. Everything was planned. And nobody is gonna tell you anything at all.
No soul
Diversity hires can be deadly.
Disaster hires.
And brave and stunning! 😆
@@sunlion8866hand picked for diversity’s sake.
A similar security and risk control failure happen with the Apollo missions when in 1970, NASA diversified their forces, it got so bad that NASA had to shut down the whole project. Quotas don't work, excepts never.
@@me8751 Show me one.
Horrible horrible human being
So yes they saw him and knew him.
They didn’t expect that he will miss the shot.
The most hated traitor in American CHEATLE
That’s saying something!
I don't know..... Fauci is top of the list as well..😮😮😮😮😮
Mayorkas is definitely at the top of that list...
Her name says it all
Fire this woman immediately
Truth is needed now!
She's a purjurer who should be arrested!!!
I dont know of any hearings that ever achieved anything. She's lying, evading and still getting paid... and the house doesnt have the power to do anything about it, so why even put on this show?
@Bald The most accurate comment ever on You Tube! And commend you for your grammar! Carry on!!
They are putting on a show because they are voted for and Cheatle is an assigned position. They know we are outraged. 7:18
At least the exposure should tell the people that Jill's appointee and company should be voted out and replaced in November. We're seeing dirty laundry aired, at least that's something. Also for the first time in 4 years, there is at least some bipartisan agreement. She will definitely not be staying at her job for long.
Repeated exposure to the point of near unanimous public agreement in the truth.
It shows for one, how corrupt and desperate the globalists are
Real..Question..Is:...Who..Gave..the..Order??
Some high ranking demon. For we wrestle not against flesh and blood..........
Cheatle answers to Homeland Security, who answers to the President. Demoxrats thats who! L 7:18 ets ask them some questions! @carlbodene8150
Find Langley on the map
Blackrock..
democratic
“Maybe when the president wakes up from his nap, he can fire you.” GOLD.
Congress must withhold funds from this horrible,dishonest woman immediately!!!!
It's like the Epstein shenanigans all over again.
"We record all radio comms."
"Oh, so you have them for the assassination attempt."
"No... the recorders weren't working that day...."
EXACTLY because it was set up. They said that 20 year old had 3 encrypted offshore accounts 😒 I don’t know if that’s true I heard it on you tube news I think
@@SarahJohnson-v3pexactly why we don’t keep him alive? Find out who is behind the scenes
29 years going on 30. She wants that 30 yr government pension which is probably about $4K a month.
She doesn't deserve it. She should be fired NOW.
This woman was hired into the secret Service coming from security at PEPSI COLA..she is a Friend of Joe and Jill Biden
$4k a month…my husband gets that from local PD. I’m sure we are funding a lot more than that. She needs to be fired and pension revoked for her gross negligence and criminal neglect.
It would be alot more then 4k more like 5 to 7 k
So basically he was still “suspicious” holding a rifle aiming at the podium, but a “threat” only seconds before the shots were fired. If he was a threat, those shots should not have been allowed to be fired!
HAHA.
I would expect myself to be able to know the operations well enough (as a 29 year veteran) to be able to see IMMEDIATELY where, who, and why the failure occurred. THATS THE WAY PEOPLE USED TO OPERATE.
This B should be fired
She is out. Let's move on.
You could safely bet your house she was wearing an earpiece and repeating answers from her superiors. Her hair covered her left ear throughout the entire proceeding.
Good call
Good call
A guy on a roof with a gun is called a situation being worked ... wow! Who gave the sniper the stand down order not to shoot Crooks?
The agent who fired the shot killing the shooter had reported that he had the guy in his sights but he wasn't given the go ahead to take him out.
yeah, its almost as though he had to wait till the patsy fired first.... because if the counter sniper that "waited for the ok" took out the patsy (before) the patsy fired, then the real marksman wouldn't be able to follow through with his hit.(where ever he was perched?) . I'm sure after Trump went down, they thought they accomplished what they wanted.. but when the patsy was killed, the real marksman couldn't give himself away by firing anymore shots .. IDK , just another theory . we're getting no answers. so we might as well, look at all possibilities right.. like watching a who done it triple agent spy movie. This is unacceptable. People need to be held accountable..!
@@connieworcester55I think your theory is 100%. I've been saying the exact same thing 👍
@@connieworcester55 I've seen this movie before, Mark Wahlberg's "Shooter". Maybe they are inspired by that movie. Jeeez.
I also wondered if the ss held their guns towards the “shooter” and waited for him to shoot Trump, then they killed the shooter, from being questioned by authorities…..I’m sure he was “promised” to be paid, not killed. Common sense is not conspiracy theory. Putting two and two together is not conspiracy theories.
he didn't need an order
that is the whole problem
WOW ! That's how to lay it on the line. Good work. Call it as it really is.
Jail jail jail jail jail, how is this possible that the director effectively say I don’t know and I will not answer, and waste everyone’s time and congress can’t do a thing about it? I don’t understand why we even bother with this process
Why does it appear that no one in America can fire this ghastly woman.
Shes a professional liar
Radio transmissions are routinely recorded...she is lying.
Re assigned, not fired
Not fired, prosecuted.
Disney will take her... She may be able to get the part of Hooch in the Turner & Hooch remake.
by the time a person is identified as a threat - the threat would have manifested itself .
Fire this lady
And send her pension to the family of the man that died and the two that were injured on her watch! Such complete incompetence, lying, and stonewalling, she is evil.
@@BHeart-lw1di definitely she should go to jail
When the president wakes up 😂
What a waste of time
Government employees are rarely held accountable. Employment for life with great benefits.
Top tier Healthcare
Just my two (hundred?) cents, the director answers every question as though she's just a stooge; a yes-ma'am who tells people what to do because she's told what to tell them to do, and thus doesn't actually see herself as responsible, no matter how much she claims she is taking responsibility. That's how in one breath she can claim responsibility, then finish her sentence with "I don't have any explanation or answers for anything."
I'm not implying there's a conspiracy behind her, I'm simply using the old Sherlock Holmes method of deductive reasoning: "Take away the impossible, and whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth." Let's say she has been ordered by someone or some agency with the authority to do so that she cannot disclose any information contained within an ongoing federal investigation; if that's the case, while she then would be unable to disclose that information, she could still simply say "I cannot disclose any information about an ongoing federal investigation that might compromise that investigation, were it to be made publicly available before the investigation had reached its conclusion."
Notice, however, the answers she does give, repeatedly, over and over and over again. "I'm asking those questions myself." "That is something the FBI would have to tell you." "It's part of an investigation." "I don't have that in front of me right now." "I don't want to disclose communications with my subordinates." What do all of these have in common? They're completely empty, devoid of any substance, smoke and mirrors. Worse than not providing an answer, they provide what I like to call "less than an answer". This is because, instead of providing clarity, these responses all add more questions, such as "why?"
The event has already come and gone, which means everything that needed to be decided, such as the perimeter, is in the past, the event has happened, so all those details are set in stone and not subject to change. Those are facts. There is absolutely no reason why, over a week later, she should still be "asking those questions", they had a perimeter, it was decided on whether it was good or bad, and the information about it exists, so there is absolutely no reason why the director of the agency should not instantly have that answer provided to her and ready to present at a hearing. "Why?" If it's impossible for her to be unable to gain this information, being, as she is, the director of the agency, and thus should have access to nearly every detail (after all, she claims she spoke to the counter-sniper herself), we must move on to what is improbable.
It is very improbable that she is so utterly incompetent, or powerless and without respect by her own subordinates, that, in more than a week, she would still be unable to obtain basic information about one of the most egregious security breaches in the agency's history; if this is true, that means she is either catastrophically incompetent by means of being completely unaware of what basic information she should be asking for (and thus unfit for her post), or completely lacking the power and authority within her own agency, over her own subordinates, to get them to provide her with the most basic information (and thus, unfit for her post.)
Either of these two paints her as an extremely incapable leader over an agency considered to be so important; it means she is in a position where, before a congressional hearing, at which she was present only because she was under a subpoena, she, as the person nominally in charge of the actions of the secret service, has no information or apparently no way to get it expedited to her, either of which in turn paints the agency itself as completely incompetent and untrustworthy. So is she just a figurehead with no power, no authority, no actual oversight over the actions of her underlings, leaving them free to do whatever they feel like doing with the billions of dollars their agency receives, or has she really fumbled as unbelievably monumentally as her responses make her appear to have done?
Again, all she'd have to do, whether it was satisfactory or not, would be to say "that set of details is currently classified as part of a federal investigation that would be jeopardized if the information was released to the public prior to the close of the investigation." Sure, this takes it out of her immediate hands so that she wouldn't have to answer, but it provides an answer to "why?" A professional in any agency, industry, business, line of work, or whatever else, especially one at the very top of their organization, should never have a good reason to obfuscate an answer so much that it leaves people wondering why you feel so deathly compelled to obfuscate. It implies worse than incompetence, it implies worse than ignorance, it implies even worse than trying to cover up for an honest mistake or set of honest mistakes. It suggests fundamentally unsettling implications regarding where she really fits in the chain of command within our government; who answers to her, and who does she answer to?
She claims the buck stops with her and that she will be taking responsibility, but the only thing she has shown when being asked to actually step up to the responsibilities she claimed she would be taking is an immovable desire to redirect, deflect, and skirt around practically every single question. 29 years in the agency, she says? Worked her way up through the ranks, she says? Doesn't that imply that she has an incredible wealth of knowledge, understands much of what the agency is responsible for from top to bottom from having been there, and likely has every necessary connection to ensure all of those elements work well? Surely achieving her lofty status after such a long and illustrious career implies that she couldn't be incompetent, and surely not so powerless that she has no functional authority over her minions.
I feel like we should be able to comfortably write off these two possibilities as 'impossible', but there is unfortunately the specter of her own stance on forcing "diversity" into her agency; maybe she really is that incompetent and got the job on a recommendation or something instead of actual merit and capability, or maybe she really doesn't have any power at all. Both of these possibilities would be remedied by her immediate dismissal or resignation, and replacement with a competent, capable, intelligent, resourceful, and well-informed successor.
Unfortunately, *again*, that means the final two categories of possibility remain just that; possible. Those two, "Really bad" and "Worse", I probably would not be considered "within my freedom of speech to say", as it were. I'm sure they're self-evident at this point and that I shouldn't have to put myself in jeopardy to state them.
Could you please run for president?
“You screw up, you move up” - typical upper management
She should be in jail for treason!! She KNEW!
when the president wakes up form his nap LMFAO 😂😂
The new Secret Cervix is a fuckin joke
The more I see and hear the more I’m wondering if it wasn’t an inside hit
It absolutely was . And just saw a video where they said the shooters phone was linked to FBI
That became apparent to me right from the get go
You could give me 2 hours notice and I could walk in there and give better and more genuine answers. WTH?
Let me get this right. She was director of the secret service for less than two years.
The fine people at the rally should take her job. They were more competent and aware of the threat than her hire-a-cop.
Rest in peace Cory ✨️ 🕊
Several hours of the Kimberly of saying "I don't have that information, and I will not resign."
Get women away from jobs like this. Insane that they are in positions of security and force...
Forbes hasn't seen numbers like this in years
They talk about resign or fire...!!!???...somebody lost life because her.How abours criminal charge and jail time..????
No recorded radio communications on the day of the attempt... And they use conspiracy- theorist as an insult.
I, as a canadian, could have answered these questions better from what we all learned about the attempt online. Ridiculous!
#LockHerUp
It's time to clean that kitchen!
With all the requests to quit and from bipartisan efforts, this hard woman stands firm. Why?
BEAST!!!
No radio recordings for that day. How could i have guessed that one
The buck stops at the top with Jackass Joe.
Joe isn't even the top, he's merely a puppet for the kind of permanent bureaucracy and evil oligarchy that exists
Local law enforcement said they werent allowed in the command room. So by her admission they had no communication with local law enforcement as they used a separate radio channel. Wow.
We had all radio traffic recorded when I started in law enforcement back in the 90’s.
When the President wakes up from his nap...baahahhahahah
A good man DIED because of her incompetence . A father, a husband, a firefighter. She needs to be charged not just dismissed
All the goliaths afraid of one Davy. Priceless !!!!!
Surprised she didn’t send the TSA. If she were a CEO of a company that was negligent and cost a life because of that negligence, she would be sued into oblivion, BUT as a government employee, FAILURE is always an option when there are no repercussions. Resigning, guess the father that died protecting his family would have liked to walk away. Disgusting
These hearings should be held out of public eye for security reasons. If proceedings prove someone acted wrongly then the employer should reprimand those who failed to provide perimeter/roof coverage. Learn from mistakes.
Do you know why she picks up her pen right before she answers for certain questions?
Good questions raised why she’s not using her experience to get to the bottom of things urgently wanting 60 days sounding like she’s almost passively involved taking in info. It’s bad.
probably because she too, is just a puppet.
Inept, smug and evasive. This woman should be charged with obstruction and dereliction of duty.
He upgraded to being a threat seconds before the guns, the gunfire started 5:53 😮
A man is dead and others injured because of the deliberate “incompetence”
When she scratches her nose, she's doing the lie thing.
Yes. touching your face implies lying
Im guessing that you know this from doing it yourself?
Crooks went from being suspicious to a threat AFTER eight shots went off!!!
The question is: Who hired this DEI horror story of a woman and is this person still employed???
.
Apparently, it was Joe Biden who gave her this position. 😑 Surprise, surprise...
I would like to replace her, I have NO idea what the secret service does but evidently the director doesn't need to! So that makes me absolutely qualified!
Maybe.... If President Jill says it's ok.....
THIS IS CRMINAL ! MAKE HER ACCOUNTABLE!
I'm starting to get that feeling she may be relocating to a Colorado Federal Supermax prison cell soon.
Lol, she's not a Republican. Bannon and Navarro served prison time for contempt of Congress while 15 members of Biden's administration are currently in contempt of Congress. Only one side is ever prosecuted.
Doubtful, unfortunately
After being bombarded with so many questions, its amazing how tolerant the committee is, as the Secret service director she doesn't have any paper nor. data to proof nor prepare her answers this is absolutely unacceptable! Its such a clear cut answer that the Americans should have a rude awakening and call its almost a walk over for Trump camp
Hey, it is an ongoing investigation you know. What a bunch of liars.
Right? If we where under oath we'd be made to give an answer. She can't dance around all the answers and everything is fine. I'm not even American and this is an absolute disgrace and it makes me sick
Well paid Liars.
It's an on going lying fest to deceive ....darn I was so naive growing up...i.m surprised mayorkas and several others aren't seated around her in a circle...
In those "seconds" before the first shot that SS knew he was a threat, what did they do? Who specifically knew? Did the counter-sniper know? Should have asked follow-up questions. And what actions did the SS take when they knew he was suspicious? Did they keep track of him?
I think we can all look back on this hearing and understand the TRUTH. My god
She needs to step down Now
Should of demanded she place the pen down out of her hands, she’s using it as a coping mechanism to hide anxiousness.
She would have been considerably more flustered if this would of happened.
No communication cohesion. FAILURE!
100% agree with Kevin James!