The smoke alarm ad shows how good they are it was an ad. Saying 15 children died in fires, imagine if there was no such alarms. That only 15 children died in house fires is remarkable. Make sure you fit, clean and replace the battery
That was such a sweet reaction. You were genuinely moved. Which, I suppose, shows how effective the ads are. I don't think they have them like that, any more. It seems to be years since I've seen one.
These were not adverts, they were public service announcements (PSA's) and even after all these later, they're still as powerful as when they were released originally. I want to give a massive shout out to all those incredible actors in those PSA's who did such a magnificent job of getting the messages across.
These adverts or public service information films are there for people to learn to do first aid or give to charities to help fund research or just to spread awareness
The adverts that were for charities (or research) have multiple aims, though primarily, I would imagine, they are fund raisers. They want to show the horrors or challenges that they deal with, so that people will donate money. Helping to grow public awareness is another aim and getting people to volunteer or join the cause is another. How effective they are can only be answered by the charities themselves, but they have to make an impact. If you could afford to give one hundredth of your wage away each month to a cause, how would you select which cause or causes to donate to ? Very often people donate or volunteer to causes that have affected someone they know but others may be swayed by an 'effective' advert. Picture yourself in the charge of a charity that is running out of funds. Very shortly your organisation will not be able to help anyone at all without further donations. What would you do ? And for some types of charities, you have to constantly be aware of the next crisis and the one after that. This is much more difficult nowadays as the way we watch media has, and continues to change dramatically.
These are harsh ones Thandi, beware for part 2! Though the boy in the fire always gets me, there's a few in part 2 that are as bad (Emma Thomson one & the last one), very effective.
Motor nueron desease, My manager michelle had it, she started with shaking hand, it affects your whole body, the elctrical signals in the brain, begin to stop working, thses signals are what tells you body what to do, from muscle movement, to breathing, she passed in 3 years your right to reference rugby player, rob burrows an england player has just passed, and there are few other players who have be diagnosed around the world terrible desease, no cure,
The smoke alarm ad shows how good they are it was an ad. Saying 15 children died in fires, imagine if there was no such alarms. That only 15 children died in house fires is remarkable. Make sure you fit, clean and replace the battery
That was such a sweet reaction. You were genuinely moved. Which, I suppose, shows how effective the ads are.
I don't think they have them like that, any more. It seems to be years since I've seen one.
No I don’t think so either. The RSPCA ones are very graphic but that’s about it
These were not adverts, they were public service announcements (PSA's) and even after all these later, they're still as powerful as when they were released originally. I want to give a massive shout out to all those incredible actors in those PSA's who did such a magnificent job of getting the messages across.
Watched these videos many time but the "I'm Scared" from the little boy gets me every time 😔
These adverts or public service information films are there for people to learn to do first aid or give to charities to help fund research or just to spread awareness
The adverts that were for charities (or research) have multiple aims, though primarily, I would imagine, they are fund raisers.
They want to show the horrors or challenges that they deal with, so that people will donate money. Helping to grow public awareness is another aim and getting people to volunteer or join the cause is another.
How effective they are can only be answered by the charities themselves, but they have to make an impact.
If you could afford to give one hundredth of your wage away each month to a cause, how would you select which cause or causes to donate to ? Very often people donate or volunteer to causes that have affected someone they know but others may be swayed by an 'effective' advert.
Picture yourself in the charge of a charity that is running out of funds. Very shortly your organisation will not be able to help anyone at all without further donations. What would you do ? And for some types of charities, you have to constantly be aware of the next crisis and the one after that.
This is much more difficult nowadays as the way we watch media has, and continues to change dramatically.
The phone would be no use in many situations where time is crucial and people panic. That's why it's promoting to learn first aid
Where ist part 2?
These are harsh ones Thandi, beware for part 2! Though the boy in the fire always gets me, there's a few in part 2 that are as bad (Emma Thomson one & the last one), very effective.
Oh this vids4 months old! xD Ah well, how are you?
Motor nueron desease, My manager michelle had it, she started with shaking hand, it affects your whole body, the elctrical signals in the brain, begin to stop working, thses signals are what tells you body what to do, from muscle movement, to breathing, she passed in 3 years
your right to reference rugby player, rob burrows an england player has just passed, and there are few other players who have be diagnosed around the world
terrible desease, no cure,
South African rugby player Joost Van de Westhuizen also had it, awful disease
When will part 2 come? :)
Soon, this week :)
@@UKreactionsStill Not there