@@torradasuprema395 aqui os preços são exorbitantes mesmo não pagamos pelo que as lojas compram e sim pelo desempenho e pelo hype do hardware. Se o hardware tiver um ótimo desempenho, então pode esperar que irão cobrar muito caro e se o hardware for um fracasso em desempenho ainda sim, eles irão cobrar caro pelo valor que pagaram + a margem de lucro.
@@PatrykkPlay At stock it isn´t. Actually you can get 65W TDP and performance will stay nearly the same. The scaling is just bad. But normally Zen 5 consumes slightly less
@@RicardoSilvaTripcallis it much better in productivity work? Cause i don’t see the point in the 9000 series main reason as soon as i saw the release i bought a 7700 straight away
@@OneFreeMan17no they van still be gpu bottlenecked even at 1080p. Qould bw bettwrcto test with dual gpu setup of 5800x 3D 7800x 3D 7700x & 9700x on mGPU games to remove all forms of gpu bottleneck.
History repeating itself. Performance uplift from Ryzen 1700X to Ryzen 2700X was like 0.8% to 1.5% The main reason was because it was AMD's first try at DDR4 system. And then now it's happening again 7700X to 9700X almost non existent uplift. But 9700X has broader DDR5 timing and sub-timing control than Ryzen 7000s
If the 9700X will be at same price as the 7700X, then and only then will I choose the 9700X. If the 7700X will be cheaper (e.g. $5), then better choose the 7700X.
In most titles the 7700x seems to have better 0.1% lows... After the 9700x reviews I just got a 7700/B650/RAM upgrade, can do 5500/FLCK2100/6000-CL28-36 while being undervolted/stockRAMVoltage at 88W powerlimit, theoretically it should be slightly faster than a stock 7700x... Actually, I don't even know the limits because I only had it lock up on boot once while I tried FCLK2100/5550 at a mistyped CPU undervolt(instead of 0.025V undervolt I typed 0.25V)... had to reset CMOS ...I'll try harder once I get a new GPU...
Both Intel and AMD are in a weird spot right now. In a proper, non-stock price based economic world...they could just be honest and say they have nothing to offer for a few years. But in our world...they have to keep pushing out products despite currently being mostly unable to get real performance gains while they do more R&D on next-gen chips. Wild that their shares would go down more from honesty than trying to push obviously sub-par chips. Awesome world we live in!
The 7800x3D is like £380 rn which is super expensive and higher than it has been in the past i can get a 7700 for under 200 and can do gaming well and productivity if i decide to in the future
Price is the only reason. The 7700 is actually a much better cost-benefit than 7800x3d. The 7700 costs $200 less and gets 90% of the performance in gaming. Besides, the fps on the 7700 is way higher than 150 fps in any game anyway. The main bottleneck in 4k ultra is the gpu not the cpu. So, save money on the cpu, and get a better gpu. You can even get a cheaper r5 7600 cpu and be very satisfied for gaming.
@@ДанилаМастерЛомастер This is bullshit, sorry but this is what it is... Still working very well for everything... Even GOW Ragnarok, RDR2, etc... But I would consider buying a 5700x with a MB to get rid of my Intel...
In single core, the 9700x literally trucidate the 7700X. So it would be great to add the best computer emulation machine (not a VM, but an emulation machine such in 86Box) and do a comparison with a Windows XP game. For retrogamers, the 9700X is by far superior than the 7700X.
so 9000 is much more expensive in fact, although AMD promised prices lower than 7000. and the increase in productivity does not correspond to the price increase at all
@@rodrigorras as of right now, in my country (EU): 7600 - 210€ / 7700X - 315€ 9600X - 315€ / 9700X - 405€ It's pointless if the price goes down in 9 or 12 months time. Dude. Sales are so poor that a 20~25€ cut had to be done in the first week (EU). These SKUs are a joke.
@@crowntotheundergroud 3770, 3770k, Core i5-3570k, and there was Ivy Bridge-E and EP processors like the Core i7-4960x and E5-1680 v2. Ivy Bridge did have a modest 100MHz clock bump and the IPC was 5% higher, but typically the 3770k did not overclock as well as the i7-2600k or 2700k. Ivy Bridge is when Intel began to use Thermal Paste between the IHS and CPU die, so even if you had a good chip, it would hit its thermal limits at around 4.8GHz, unless you delidded. Lucky people that won the silicon lottery with the 2500k, early 2600k, and 2700k processors could hit 5.0Ghz with reasonable voltage. Intel did beef up the Memory controller with Ivy Bridge. It's fairly easy to run 2400MT/s RAM with a 3770k, while a 2500k/2600k needs tuning with 2133MT/s RAM. Intel's main focus with Ivy Bridge was trying to please Apple and laptop makers by beefing up the iGPU. 4770k, 4670k, and the infamous 4790k are 4th Gen Haswell processors. At least these have AVX2, and these had a 10% to 15% IPC bump over Ivy Bridge.
@@CassandraCredreri yea Intel really f'd up big time with their 10nm node. I don't think there was any performance improvement from the 6th gen all the way up to the 11th. Maybe 20% at most. People were cheering on AMD, especially with Zen 2, as it finally matched the performance of Intel's offering, the 9th gen. It was still slightly behind, but what people didn't really acknowledge was that Zen 2 had just REALLY only just caught up to the 6700k. Everyone was hyper focused on the fact that AMD had more cores at the time. The thing is, it's not really a great thing having to rely on more cores for more performance. Having fewer stronger cores is far more desirable. There are multithreaded applications that have instructions that can only be executed with a single thread. That means, if 1% of a multithreaded application still required single threaded execution, and that 1% takes 1 hour to execute, 99% of the application could be done within a few seconds with a million threaded cpu, but it will still take a whole ass hour to execute. This is known as Amdahl's law.
Reminds me of my 10700k being similar to a 9900k despite being released almost 2 years later. So it was like buying a new cpu back in 2020 was akin to buying it in 2018 lol. Intel and AMD not too different from one another. So another reason not to be a fan boy of any company.
lol, you won't see any difference at all in higher resolutions. did you overpay for 5% of the speed, what, 50% of the cost relative to the 7700x? Very stupid
You know, not all are gamers out there. For example it's 20% faster in photoshop than zen4. In Apache HTTP Server Ryzen 9700X is 76% (!!!) faster than 7700X. That's something. Games are just not a priority. It's made for Google/Amazon/Meta servers etc.
Consumers are not the majority. A consumer buys 1 chip every 4-6 years. Huge servers can buy up to a 100 at once. There is a world outside of your bubble. @@adlibconstitution1609
@@adlibconstitution1609 Not this time. AMD is clearly aiming for the server market with this architecture. These same new cores are used in AMD EPYC Processors.
Как только Intel споткнулся, AMD решила занять его рынок. Ждём прирост в 15 ФПС из поколения в поколение с ростом цены естественно😂. А кто-то думал, что им завезут ФПС дёшево, но рыночек порешал!
Что-то как-то не видно особого снижения температур. Разви что в обратном направлении, обратный прогресс в этом плане наблюдается. Честно что-то как-то я побаиваюсь собирать комп с новыми поколениями процессоров 12,13,14 поколения. Гонка между intel и AMD. Заставила их гнаться за производительностью, в ущерб надёжности. Да и временем они не проверенны каких то 3-4 года. А судя по отзывам покупателей половина из них уже успешно деградировали. Особенно intel. Да и AMD как говорят люди так же успешно отлечтают на помойку. А времени прошло сколько? Ну максимум года 3 с рилиза. Короче если собираешь комп для игор, то я так полагаю какой нибудь i9 11900KF будит куда более предпочтителен. Топ видюхи от зелёных он тянет не особа напрягаясь, а в играх что нужно, а именно видео карта. За редким исключением конечно. Он дешевле . Так как устарел благодаря новым высерам от AMD и intel. А назвать подругому эту гонку за температурами я не могу. Сколько бы меня не уверяли что 100 градусов это норма. Я вам скажу что это нихрена не норма. Процессоры гниют крышки гнутся. Сокет материнской платы хорошо горит. Такая система прослужит ну максимум год. Короче если и ставить топ процессор последнего поколения то собирать не в корпусе всем доступном, а в долбаном холодильнике с какой нибудь кастомной системой охлаждения на азоте. Если вы конечно не сын/дочь президента и позволяите себе каждый день менять комп.
@@culixulNot when the 7800x 3D can't clock past 5.0 ghz while the 9700zlx 3D is unlcoked & can go past 5.0ghz. Curve otpimizet, curve shaper, fully unlocked finally.
Частоты одинаковые, потребление одинаковое, производительность тоже практически одинаковая. Такое ощущение, что один и тот же процессор, но с другим названием и конечно же ценой
9000 series looks like trash. Same performance with 7000 series 😂 Intel will destroy easily it with 15th gen processors. Edit:01/11/2024. Shit! According the last news AMD looks better , i ll buy 9800x3d when release. X870 Mobo&Ram bought. Waiting for CPU.
@@Ace-mo1pv ??? OCed 13600k at $200 is a joke when it beats a $350 9700x by 30% in productivity and 5% in gaming? Classic AMDelusional fanboy. Keep glazing Zen 5%.
AMD getting complacent. I hope they remember what that did to intel. Theyre probably bored of doing so well. Im jist glad the 9950X3D will have dual 3D cache. Might actually make me upgrade yet again
@@OneFreeMan17 i also have a 7800X3D, the best gaming cpu ever made, the ONLY thing AMD did right. But I'm not an AMD boy and I believe you're not either.
@@augustomartins9516 Never be a fan boy. Both AMD and Intel are not saints. So just buy the better product. Intel 9th and 10th were as fcked up as this 7000 vs 9000 ryzen comparison.
![Почему Интел - это контора 3,14.. [+ тесты Core Ultra]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/XI87U0PtEMU/mqdefault.jpg)
Games :
Star Wars Outlaws - 0:00
CYBERPUNK 2077 - 0:54
Horizon Forbidden West - 2:03
Hogwarts Legacy - 3:10
Ghost of Tsushima - 4:09
Forza Horizon 5 - 5:00
PUBG - 5:52
Microsoft Flight Simulator - 6:49
Red Dead Redemption 2 - 7:49
Starfield - 8:58
System:
Windows 11
Ryzen 7 7700X - bit.ly/3rd8bfz
Ryzen 7 9700X - bit.ly/3SFMxPd
MSI MPG X670E CARBON
G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB 32GB DDR5 6000MHz - bit.ly/3XlBGdU
CPU Cooler - be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4 - bit.ly/35G5atV
GeForce RTX 4090 24GB - bit.ly/3CSaMCj
SSD - 2xSAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB - bit.ly/2NmWeQe
Power Supply CORSAIR HX Series HX1200 1200W - bit.ly/3EZWtNj
謝謝分享，建議 加 R5 5600X
we have to guess the resolution? I only play in 4k... where is my benchmark?
Ryzen 7700 with heatsink only costs around $230 in my country, while 9700x without heatsink is $410. This is an absolute scam😂
Both are a scam here in Brazil, actually, everything here is a scam
@@torradasuprema395 aqui os preços são exorbitantes mesmo
não pagamos pelo que as lojas compram e sim pelo desempenho e pelo hype do hardware.
Se o hardware tiver um ótimo desempenho, então pode esperar que irão cobrar muito caro e se o hardware for um fracasso em desempenho ainda sim, eles irão cobrar caro pelo valor que pagaram + a margem de lucro.
@torradasuprema395 People love to overuse the word scam lol.
That cooler/heatsink is trash don’t use it on the 7700 😭 maybe to test to see if it boots up but to actually do anything on no
@@Qelyn um 7700 isn’t that power hungry and wraith prism isn’t a bad cooler for gaming use
Well, at least some difference has appeared😅
And power draw is a bit higher now!
@@PatrykkPlay At stock it isn´t. Actually you can get 65W TDP and performance will stay nearly the same. The scaling is just bad. But normally Zen 5 consumes slightly less
ryzen 9000 with 105w didn't change anything
Some people were saying that this new generation were more power efficient, as we can see, they were also delusional about that ...
@@RicardoSilvaTripcallis it much better in productivity work? Cause i don’t see the point in the 9000 series main reason as soon as i saw the release i bought a 7700 straight away
Useless generation.
Ryzen 7000 Remastered Edition
9700X vs 5800X3D on 24H2 Please bro
Und 4 k!
@@dirkneumann7248CPU tests are better done with 1080p
@@OneFreeMan17no they van still be gpu bottlenecked even at 1080p.
Qould bw bettwrcto test with dual gpu setup of 5800x 3D 7800x 3D 7700x & 9700x on mGPU games to remove all forms of gpu bottleneck.
History repeating itself.
Performance uplift from Ryzen 1700X to Ryzen 2700X was like 0.8% to 1.5%
The main reason was because it was AMD's first try at DDR4 system. And then now it's happening again 7700X to 9700X almost non existent uplift. But 9700X has broader DDR5 timing and sub-timing control than Ryzen 7000s
If the 9700X will be at same price as the 7700X, then and only then will I choose the 9700X. If the 7700X will be cheaper (e.g. $5), then better choose the 7700X.
Personally, I don't give a fk about CPUs above 65W. Getting power by rising power consumption and calling it the next generation is a new low.
It's on a newer 4nm process with new IPC so ofc it's a new gen. And you can't see the real difference in games that are GPU bound.
You have not been watching Intel over these last seven years, now have you?
Yes I did, starting with 12th series, everything went hillbilly
@@chovekb how does that koolaid taste?
That's why I love my stock 7700
In most titles the 7700x seems to have better 0.1% lows... After the 9700x reviews I just got a 7700/B650/RAM upgrade, can do 5500/FLCK2100/6000-CL28-36 while being undervolted/stockRAMVoltage at 88W powerlimit, theoretically it should be slightly faster than a stock 7700x... Actually, I don't even know the limits because I only had it lock up on boot once while I tried FCLK2100/5550 at a mistyped CPU undervolt(instead of 0.025V undervolt I typed 0.25V)... had to reset CMOS ...I'll try harder once I get a new GPU...
Doubt you will be stable but good luck
5 more watt for 5 more fps, while costing 50$+ more
its for the more cores not for gaming
@@SssNiTroGeN yeah, 9700X 8 cores is more cores than 7700x 8 cores 😁
@@Dimastiy5565 LOL
@@Dimastiy5565 my bad i thought it was the ryzen 9 7900x
the names are getting confusing lol
AMD promised a lower price than the 7000 series)))
I have heard that bios updates for this gen can improve performance significantly. More so for Zen 5 than Zen 4
Both Intel and AMD are in a weird spot right now. In a proper, non-stock price based economic world...they could just be honest and say they have nothing to offer for a few years. But in our world...they have to keep pushing out products despite currently being mostly unable to get real performance gains while they do more R&D on next-gen chips. Wild that their shares would go down more from honesty than trying to push obviously sub-par chips. Awesome world we live in!
I had my 7900x at 105 watts turned it back up to 170watts get mutch higher gpu usage so mutch better no lag leave it at stock for better fps
Help me understand please.... Why would you buy any other cpu besides 5800x3D or 7800X3D if you do only gaming?
Indeed
budget
The x3d processors are dominant in gaming, while all non x3d processors excel more at production tasks
The 7800x3D is like £380 rn which is super expensive and higher than it has been in the past i can get a 7700 for under 200 and can do gaming well and productivity if i decide to in the future
Price is the only reason. The 7700 is actually a much better cost-benefit than 7800x3d.
The 7700 costs $200 less and gets 90% of the performance in gaming. Besides, the fps on the 7700 is way higher than 150 fps in any game anyway. The main bottleneck in 4k ultra is the gpu not the cpu. So, save money on the cpu, and get a better gpu.
You can even get a cheaper r5 7600 cpu and be very satisfied for gaming.
My 3700x still doing pretty good... I luv it, best CPU I ever had... Don't think I need to upgrade any soon...
3700x is already shit, which is inferior to the same 5600x by about 20-30%. and you could update for a long time for free by selling your 3700x
@@ДанилаМастерЛомастер This is bullshit, sorry but this is what it is... Still working very well for everything...
Even GOW Ragnarok, RDR2, etc...
But I would consider buying a 5700x with a MB to get rid of my Intel...
AM5 has a long-lasting socket connection structure because only names change 😎
Arrowlake... what you got?
In single core, the 9700x literally trucidate the 7700X. So it would be great to add the best computer emulation machine (not a VM, but an emulation machine such in 86Box) and do a comparison with a Windows XP game. For retrogamers, the 9700X is by far superior than the 7700X.
Dude, wtf, how many people do that? this comparison has no relevance ...
how much juggling
Who will buy a new CPU to play old "XP" games? 😂😂😂
Mental gymnastics and delusions of fanboys ars hitting new high.
Since some insist, here's the supposed "mental gymnastics" and "delusions" hitting a new high!
Geekbench 6 (Single core):
Ryzen 7 7700x: 2898
Ryzen 9 9700x: 3362
Intel Core i9-13900K: 2868
Cinebench 2024 (Single core)
Ryzen 7 7700x: 119
Ryzen 9 9700x: 134
Intel Core i9-13900K: 132
Cinebench R23 (Single core):
Ryzen 7 7700x: 2010
Ryzen 9 9700x: 2206
Intel Core i9-13900K: 2241
Cinebench R20 (Single core):
Ryzen 7 7700x: 773
Ryzen 9 9700x: 866
Intel Core i9-13900K: 877
its simple,if u have 7000 series don´t upgrade,but if you build a new setup,go for 9000 series..
so 9000 is much more expensive in fact, although AMD promised prices lower than 7000. and the increase in productivity does not correspond to the price increase at all
Ryzen 5 - 5% more performance - 25% higher price - GG AMD
in a lot of other applications, 9700x is amazing. Render, Workstation, compressiing, Linux, coding, compiling etc. And the plus is 5%
@@rodrigorras Guess what, people dont care, sales are very poor (as expected) - 2 years of waiting for Meh, overpriced CPUs.
@@get-in-2-get-out774 costs going down dude
@@rodrigorras as of right now, in my country (EU):
7600 - 210€ / 7700X - 315€
9600X - 315€ / 9700X - 405€
It's pointless if the price goes down in 9 or 12 months time. Dude.
Sales are so poor that a 20~25€ cut had to be done in the first week (EU). These SKUs are a joke.
@@get-in-2-get-out774 u are wrong. 9700x can be found for 359USD
AMD is having their Ivy Bridge moment
Ivy Bridge was trash? That was the 3770k and 4770k right? I think i remember hearing Sandy Bridge or something would outperform it sometimes
@@crowntotheundergroud 3770, 3770k, Core i5-3570k, and there was Ivy Bridge-E and EP processors like the Core i7-4960x and E5-1680 v2. Ivy Bridge did have a modest 100MHz clock bump and the IPC was 5% higher, but typically the 3770k did not overclock as well as the i7-2600k or 2700k. Ivy Bridge is when Intel began to use Thermal Paste between the IHS and CPU die, so even if you had a good chip, it would hit its thermal limits at around 4.8GHz, unless you delidded. Lucky people that won the silicon lottery with the 2500k, early 2600k, and 2700k processors could hit 5.0Ghz with reasonable voltage.
Intel did beef up the Memory controller with Ivy Bridge. It's fairly easy to run 2400MT/s RAM with a 3770k, while a 2500k/2600k needs tuning with 2133MT/s RAM.
Intel's main focus with Ivy Bridge was trying to please Apple and laptop makers by beefing up the iGPU.
4770k, 4670k, and the infamous 4790k are 4th Gen Haswell processors. At least these have AVX2, and these had a 10% to 15% IPC bump over Ivy Bridge.
@@crowntotheundergroud 9th and 10th gen as well. Buying a 10th gen i7 was as good as buying a 9th gen which was released 2 years apart lmfao
@@CassandraCredreri yea Intel really f'd up big time with their 10nm node. I don't think there was any performance improvement from the 6th gen all the way up to the 11th. Maybe 20% at most. People were cheering on AMD, especially with Zen 2, as it finally matched the performance of Intel's offering, the 9th gen. It was still slightly behind, but what people didn't really acknowledge was that Zen 2 had just REALLY only just caught up to the 6700k. Everyone was hyper focused on the fact that AMD had more cores at the time. The thing is, it's not really a great thing having to rely on more cores for more performance. Having fewer stronger cores is far more desirable. There are multithreaded applications that have instructions that can only be executed with a single thread. That means, if 1% of a multithreaded application still required single threaded execution, and that 1% takes 1 hour to execute, 99% of the application could be done within a few seconds with a million threaded cpu, but it will still take a whole ass hour to execute. This is known as Amdahl's law.
Ryzen Zen 5 would have another reputation if this was the performance at the release.
Just bought my 7700x from microcenter for $150. Hard times beat for the price.
hardly any difference 😂
Reminds me of my 10700k being similar to a 9900k despite being released almost 2 years later. So it was like buying a new cpu back in 2020 was akin to buying it in 2018 lol. Intel and AMD not too different from one another. So another reason not to be a fan boy of any company.
Please in CPU tests add some game that Sensitive to single-core speed , like rainbow six siege, cs2 or valorant
AMD was doing so well because they did that on the 9000?
you get better results in higher resolutions . I have the 9700x and its amazing .
lol, you won't see any difference at all in higher resolutions. did you overpay for 5% of the speed, what, 50% of the cost relative to the 7700x? Very stupid
Can we get 65w vs 105w profile for the 9700x?
바이오스 최신버젼 맞나요? 램 클럭은 얼마에 맞췄나요? 성능이
15프로 이상 향상되었다던데
На всех райзенах увеличили производительность на виндовс 11 24h2
Ну что поклонники AMD, смеялись над Intel и +5% производительности между поколениями? Теперь получайте свои +2% FPS у AMD😂
stock 9700x can only have 88W max power consumption this is overclocked which defeats the whole purpose of the 65W TDP CPU
May be it produce a lot more differences with rtx 4070ti super or rx7900xt or lower tier VGA?
Rtx 4060ti vs 3060ti all over again
CPUs is the biggest bottleneck in gaming. Always catching up with GPUs and game tech.
I purchased a 9700x and I'm quite happy with it.
and how much did you overpay relative to the 7700x?)
@@ДанилаМастерЛомастер 9%
7 become 9 by printing mistake 😂
It's basically the same crap they are delivering. 😢
....and without an included box cooler this time. Yay!
Good, at least I wont have to spend extra hehe
the new gen of ryzen is just a joke
You know, not all are gamers out there. For example it's 20% faster in photoshop than zen4. In Apache HTTP Server Ryzen 9700X is 76% (!!!) faster than 7700X. That's something. Games are just not a priority. It's made for Google/Amazon/Meta servers etc.
@@volkmaestro Most people buy Ryzen for games.
New gen of Ryzen is indeed a joke
Consumers are not the majority. A consumer buys 1 chip every 4-6 years. Huge servers can buy up to a 100 at once. There is a world outside of your bubble. @@adlibconstitution1609
@@adlibconstitution1609 Not this time. AMD is clearly aiming for the server market with this architecture. These same new cores are used in AMD EPYC Processors.
@@volkmaestro CORE COUNT ?
Is this Windows 11 23H2 or 11 24H2? Thanks
7700 super procek z rx 7800xt dobra wydajność, temperatury cpu 55c gpu 56c cos pięknego!
Как только Intel споткнулся, AMD решила занять его рынок. Ждём прирост в 15 ФПС из поколения в поколение с ростом цены естественно😂. А кто-то думал, что им завезут ФПС дёшево, но рыночек порешал!
idk why ghz clock in ryzen ups and down it doesnt stay at maximun like intel
Что-то как-то не видно особого снижения температур. Разви что в обратном направлении, обратный прогресс в этом плане наблюдается. Честно что-то как-то я побаиваюсь собирать комп с новыми поколениями процессоров 12,13,14 поколения. Гонка между intel и AMD. Заставила их гнаться за производительностью, в ущерб надёжности. Да и временем они не проверенны каких то 3-4 года. А судя по отзывам покупателей половина из них уже успешно деградировали. Особенно intel. Да и AMD как говорят люди так же успешно отлечтают на помойку. А времени прошло сколько? Ну максимум года 3 с рилиза. Короче если собираешь комп для игор, то я так полагаю какой нибудь i9 11900KF будит куда более предпочтителен. Топ видюхи от зелёных он тянет не особа напрягаясь, а в играх что нужно, а именно видео карта. За редким исключением конечно. Он дешевле . Так как устарел благодаря новым высерам от AMD и intel. А назвать подругому эту гонку за температурами я не могу. Сколько бы меня не уверяли что 100 градусов это норма. Я вам скажу что это нихрена не норма. Процессоры гниют крышки гнутся. Сокет материнской платы хорошо горит. Такая система прослужит ну максимум год. Короче если и ставить топ процессор последнего поколения то собирать не в корпусе всем доступном, а в долбаном холодильнике с какой нибудь кастомной системой охлаждения на азоте. Если вы конечно не сын/дочь президента и позволяите себе каждый день менять комп.
So, 100$ for an extra 5fps!? Nah, im good.
Im thinking it might been a more productivity update maybe as gaming amd is dominating the market currently
Lmao downgrade in forbidden west 😂
zen5 is avx 512. software need to optimize it.
AMD are strange. They found gamers heart "x3d". All are waiting for 9600/9700/9800 x3d processors, and probably with"f"
It seems to 7800x3d vs 9800x3d will have same result
Prob not 9800x3d will be more powerful they took their time with this cpu unlike all the toher ryzen 5,7 9000
It will be the same bro, 9800x3D its basically a 9700x with 3D vcache. Ryzen 7 7800x3D was also a 7700x with 3Dvcache@@manarakhs9860
@@culixulNot when the 7800x 3D can't clock past 5.0 ghz while the 9700zlx 3D is unlcoked & can go past 5.0ghz. Curve otpimizet, curve shaper, fully unlocked finally.
@@kevinerbs2778 it wont go past 5.0ghz, it will fry the 3D v cache
@@culixul yes it will.
Частоты одинаковые, потребление одинаковое, производительность тоже практически одинаковая. Такое ощущение, что один и тот же процессор, но с другим названием и конечно же ценой
Я так понял следующие на покупку идут amd после интел.
Since intel is no longer competitive Amd is just doing what intel did in the last 6 years
Intel's stagnation period was 2nd to 11th gen.
전력 더 먹은 만큼만 성능이 더 잘나오니 같은 CPU 라고 봐도 될 정도... 이정도면 상표 갈이 사기 아니냐 ㅋㅋ
7700x vs 9600x please
5 fps different for$100... Noo
Don't forget to add an additional $30 for a cooler, since this doesn't come with one.
for ryzen 9000 u should use 6400 RAM
Margin of error differences
Huita, ясно.
So now Zen 5 consumes more power than Zen 4 😂😂😂
9000 series looks like trash. Same performance with 7000 series 😂 Intel will destroy easily it with 15th gen processors. Edit:01/11/2024. Shit! According the last news AMD looks better , i ll buy 9800x3d when release. X870 Mobo&Ram bought. Waiting for CPU.
3% faster on average 👏
Glad to see my 13600k curbstomps both these jokes of a CPU
13600k beast good to see it doesnt suffer from instability like the 700 and 900k
@@ezioauditore8946 intel 🤮 100c
13th and 14th gen are a joke to begin with lol
@@Ace-mo1pv ??? OCed 13600k at $200 is a joke when it beats a $350 9700x by 30% in productivity and 5% in gaming? Classic AMDelusional fanboy. Keep glazing Zen 5%.
@ProVishGaming bro you're doing the most, trying way too hard💀
only 9% in my region
Zen 0.5%
Ryzen 9000 are Ryzen 7000 overclocked
Moral of the story no need to upgrade 🤡
Они знали что у интел проблемы поэтому не особо старались!
9000 series bubble bust...
Ryzen 7000 series cpu's 🗿🗿
Ryzen 9000 series cpu's 🤡🤡
Não Tem Diferença nenhuma, Melhor ficar com O Ryzen 7 7700X.
terrible bottleneck 1080p, blasphemy
1% minimums are much better
Ryzen 9000 is just a joke considering the pricing.
these processors will end up being cheaper after the Holiday season
Zen5%
Ryzen 7700 is the goat
Very little fps like 10 to 15 lol
zen5%
Zen 5%
Well atleast these ryzen are stable...
Why 1080 shit?
It’s a cpu test >.>
@@OneFreeMan17 Imagine having to educate these imbeciles every single time
the CPU is being tested and 1080p shifts the workload to the CPU. Videos like these are not buying advice.
Because above this resolution, you will have less stress on the CPU and more on the GPU ...
Because you seem to know sh7t how cpu testing is done...
+5 FPS for +U$100 nice joke AMD
They cost the same from where I live
@@deletochocolate5188 Lucky
@@kevinyoliveira68 that's why I'm watching this video
7800x3d it is
Indeed
Hahahahhaa Ryzen 9000, the Flop Generation
(still some hope for the X3D)
14600kf win! 🤔
라이젠 9600x 설정후 20프로 성능향상ruclips.net/video/2JtNjbZaD4E/видео.htmlsi=bX-Yvbfqju4-53Rf
AMD getting complacent. I hope they remember what that did to intel. Theyre probably bored of doing so well. Im jist glad the 9950X3D will have dual 3D cache. Might actually make me upgrade yet again
AMD boys are crying...
Not really. I got my 7800X3D and very happy with it, will be keeping it for a long time.
@@OneFreeMan17 i also have a 7800X3D, the best gaming cpu ever made, the ONLY thing AMD did right. But I'm not an AMD boy and I believe you're not either.
Always have always will be
@@РаЫо Try again.
@@augustomartins9516 Never be a fan boy. Both AMD and Intel are not saints. So just buy the better product. Intel 9th and 10th were as fcked up as this 7000 vs 9000 ryzen comparison.
Can you do 7900x versus 9900x?