Film review: Wolfman 120
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 16 окт 2024
- You can fin the Wolfman film here:
filmphotograph...
If you want to purchase my zines, here they are!
www.eduardopave...
You can support me on Patreon, too... if you want to!
/ edpavez
And follow me on social media:
/ edpavez
/ edpavez . (I use twitter mostly in Spanish)
Thank you for watching. :)
With negative film there's no such thing as "the true image" anyway. I mean technically there is but it's gonna look terrible and isn't meant to be the final image. The way it's designed, it's meant to record as much information as possible from which you then create the actual picture - be it in the darkroom or digitally. And that process will always be influenced by individual interpretation and choices, not to mention the technology.
Came for the photos, stayed for the hopelessness of trying to obtain a "pure" image unmediated by technology :)
Have enjoyed your videos and discovering new films through this channel. Great shots as always. Makes me want to go out and shoot (after not having the will to do it anymore cause how the world is now)
Your videos are always very interesting. Love the street community you show in your photography. Stay safe.
I like how you ask permission to take a photo. I have recently tried this approach as well, and have a much higher success rate this way. Most people have even been curious about the film camera I use and the details of the project, and it ends up being a great conversation. And with all of the social distancing, people are biting at the bit to have conversations and interactions I feel.
Dear Ed, how do you find the time to do so much? You have your channel, teach, study and you’re a husband. You’re a great guy and super skillful.. show me how ya do it 😭
first shot is down the block from my office. Damn man you're always where I am and I never see you in the wild!
Unfortunate about the over developing, some nice shots still!
I'm very glad I found this channel!
Perfect scans from the scanner does not exist = perfect photos from the film does not exist = perfect film from black and white emulsion does not exist = we may not exist as well 😆
And holy crap how many autocorrect 😝
My go to is D-76. That and the massive dev times have never failed me. Other developers scare me.....Great to see you back. I always try new film when it comes out. I’m still trying to like metropolis from lomo
Normally I find it really hard to over develop with HC110. In fact I don't think I ever blown a highlight with it. I love using it to semi stand develop and it will usually handle very high contrast scenes. Great video again Eduardo :)
Hola ya no saldrán más capitulos del podcast?
Aún no. Estamos en pausa con eso. Pero volveremos de seguro.
@@edpavez encontré su podcast hace poco me ha ayudado mucho gracias!
What you said about scanning and all black and white films kinda looking alike really resonates with me.
The naked photogtapher compared a couple of film stocks and most of the time the results look very similar. I do print my pictures in the darkroom though and some film stocks are easier to work with than others. But in the end I'm sure you'd be able to get the results you desire with any film stock.
Just a tip with HC-110, because the common dilution is Dilution "B", and the dev times are short, it may be better to use the unofficial Dilution "H" which is 1+62 I believe. It's basically more diluted Dilution "B" which gives you more development time and less room for error and diluted developer. Also! HC-110 Dilution 1+90 for 18 minutes is good for expired films and for films you are not sure about the time for because you should get a usable image.
Thank you so much for this info!
Tremendo video, master! Lo que yo he hecho ultimamente con mis rollos, y con buenos resultados, es sobreexponer todo aprox. 1 stop (aprox. porque a veces no me dan las velocidades) cuando uso película B/N y revelo como si hubiera sacado las fotos sin sobreexponer. Y como tiene harta latitud la película, los blancos retienen información que se recupera en postprocesado (tanto digital o print) sin ningún problema. Gracias por los videos también, se ha hecho harto más amena la cuarentena jajajaja 📸
You talked about the difference between B&W films and I completely agree in general (the slight difference between HP5+ and Tri-X are often overstated for example). By my experience, the only truly different B&W film I've ever used is the Ferrania P30.
And the Lucky SHD, which has some funky halo around the highlights.
Great video!
That film howls :D :P :P Great to see someone actually making their own emulsion. Should happen more often!!.
I believe this film to be nothing other than Fomapan 100. The development times are exactly the same.
Siempre disfrutando de tus videos. Lo que no entiendo es como aparece una película nueva. Cualquiera se pone a fabricar una película? Qué hay de las grandes fábricas como Kodak, Fuji o Agfa? Tan fácil es hacerla? Acá en Argentina no tenemos acceso a absolutamente nada de eso. Hacer fotos con película es una inversión millonaria... Saludos!!
No, es muy difícil y muy caro. Películas nuevas prácticamente no hay.
@@edpavez Bueno, justamente por eso pregunto. De dónde sale un rollo Wolfman, Babylon o Street Candy... Quién los fabrica??
@@gabocosta3373 Street candy es en verdad un rollo antiguo de cámaras de vigilancia de cajeros automáticos de banco (ATM) que lo empaquetaron en un envase nuevo. Lomo Babylon no sé qué film es, pero dicen que es un Orwo antiguo que le cambiaron el envase. Hacer film es muy caro y difícil. Por eso casi siempre los films “nuevos” que salen, son films antiguos. No sé cómo lo habrán hecho los creadores de este “Wolfman” pero me aseguraron que es una emulsión hecha por ellos. Me imagino que subarriendan a alguna empresa grande (como Ilford) y usan sus máquinas con una combinación distinta de materiales. Pero la verdad no sé cómo hicieron este film en particular.
@@edpavez Muchas gracias Eduardo, muy clara tu respuesta.
why you never darkroom print your negatives. Its alot more of fun then scanning. If you gonna go analog , go all the way. Thats just my opinion
And then how do I upload them on RUclips to show you the results in a video? I would have to print in a darkroom, then dry the print, scan the images with a flatbed scanner (which has poor quality compared to a direct negative scan with other methods) and than put those scanned files on a video. I can skip all those extra steps by showing you the scans.
@@edpavez no i dont mean for youtube, i mean for yourself.
Your videos are alway nice and relaxed
HC-110 is a pretty active developer, so temperature and agitation make a big difference.
that's what I just learned! hahaha
I love how honest u are lovely video be watching more!
I think this is a great black and white film! The photos look like old times)
I would like to watch a video about Rollei 35 s on your channel. Another video =)
Thanks!
Regardless I love the pictures that came out ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ Happy Halloween 🎃 guys and gals stay safe and healty ❤️
You should try this film with a camera that actually has a shutter and glass lens. Your plastic fantastic wouldn't be my choice to test a new film. The spring loaded shutter isn't going to help you with your evaluation.
I also used a Zeiss Ikon 530/16
Why you overdeveloped for second time
I actually don't know what happened. I shortened the developing times to a half and it still came out overdeveloped. Since I only had two rolls, I couldn't try cutting it in 1/4 and see the results.
Ah, just use rodinal stand at 1:100, easy peasy, no bad developments
I think that I still prefer JCH Streetpan 400.
Niceeeeeeeee!
ㅎㅎㅎ
You should have never dissed people who were doing photography during quarantine cuz now you look like a hypocrite. I normally like you but you were so wrong and so proud of your opinion, Im disappointed.
What do you mean? We are not in lockdown here in New York: schools, bars, subways and even some venues are open. My point was not "don't take pictures during the pandemic", (that would mean: "don't take pictures for two years"). My point was (and I said this literally in that video): "don't go out and take pictures *of empty cities during lockdowns*, because this is not about you: let the essential workers do their job and you stay at home".
@@edpavez so what it became more approprate when people were in the city? your logic is falling apart im sorry to tell you. isnt it more safe to take pictures of empty streets than when there are people out. im not saying you shouldnt be able to photograph just that you took a rather proud stance on the topic and this doesnt fall in line with that in my opinion. do your thing eduardo but dont tell others what is and isnt appropriate
@@TrentGamingCo again, there was a lockdown. We are not in lockdown anymore (for now, but cases in NYC are rising again). I really don’t know what you mean by “your logic is falling apart” if my whole point is (again): WHEN THERE IS A LOCKDOWN, do not go out and take pictures of empty streets for your personal benefit.
If there is no lockdown, why would you not go out and take pictures (taking appropriate measures)? Your point makes no sense, man.