A rifle is a woman, you can feed her , give her accessories, take her to nice places, treat her well... and she will still bust your eardrum if you aren't careful... Also, she will bust your finger if it's where it isn't supposed to be. Also, she can go anywhere for any reason. Also, she looks nice in any color, except when hello kitty is involved Also, can say the same thing in every language, no matter the language, with a single glance. Whether it be " I'm here for everyone" or " I'm here for YOU"
back then framerate is very high. a hugh effort with cel animation technology. there were so many 'in between' animators in the studio. and yes with Dominion of Canada (and ultimately the British Empire) immense fundings. the immense labor needs are no problems. And I think British Army would use these films primarily. despite that the weapon itself became obsolete too fast (and only Bazookas type weapons replace them. in case of Brits. PIAT replace it).
@@West_Coast_Mainline Yes but the Soviets did use them more as a sniper or counter sniper weapon. One such weapon ended the career of Finlands top sniper Simo Hayna
@@t___m what about mechanized vehicles and light tanks sure it wont go through a medium or heavy or MBT but if the vehicle had thin armour it could be pierced by it
around that time Germans introduced harder and bigger tanks -the likes of PzKfW3 and 4 - were introduced in increasing numbers and these were already more resilient to .55 rounds of these antitank rifles of these kind.. well some even marginalized the effectiveness of 37mm antitank guns already at this point. so these guns became useless against these. also in 1942 German Army introduced The Tiger tanks. which even capable to resist 47mm AP rounds! so Boys are nothing against them.
@@Ig_nis You could still take out a truck or half track, but you could do that with an LMG, let alone an M2. Some nationalities (Russia and I think Italy) used a 20mm AT rifle that was a fair bit more effective - though still out of date by mid war.
@DiscothecaImperialis the fact that you refferred to the Tiger 1 line of tank as "The Tigers" and made them out to be soke sort of mass produced main battle tank that saw a lot of tank-on-infantry fighting instead of being used as a very rare long distance self-propelled anti-tank gun as it actually was tells me everything i need to know about your knowledge of ww2 tanks. The fact you also went on to say "The Tigers" were immune to 47 mm guns only solidifies my belief that youre a dumbass and probably Italian. Who tf uses a 47 mm gun as a reference point? Not only was it only used by Italians and maybe Japanese at this point but the Tiger 1 was able to resist much bigger and more powerful guns at ranges it was actually used at, or even smalled ranges if the armor is angled slightly. The American 75 mm and soviet 76 mm could not penetrate the armor at 500 meters without hitting the same spot multiple times which would cause the armor to fail
@@СергейУваров-ь4жа РККА были более мощные ПТРД, а не это недоразумение, на момент выхода "мультика" которое уже надо было переименовать из противотанкового ружья во что-то другое
Exactly. I find it amazing the British were able to laugh in their situation. However, no amount of mockery could change the fact that German armor was no laughing matter.
They were required to. This was an educational cartoon intended to be watched by soldiers during WWII. The US Government commissioned them to do a ton of propaganda and training cartoons.
"...improvements in vehicle armour during the Second World War left the Boys largely ineffectual as an anti-tank weapon. A shortened version was deployed in 1942 for issue to airborne forces and saw use in Tunisia, where it proved completely ineffective because of the reduced velocity caused by the shortened barrel. A further limitation was that the Boys rifle was relatively heavy and unwieldy to carry."
Imagine you go against a Tiger with that gun. You could also just throw rocks at that point. German tanks were tough as shit. The only thing these guns could take down were light armor if they hit it in a good spot.
@@And_Gas_pseudonymPTRD uses bigger cartridge that has a bit more than twice as much energy than .50cal while BOYS became innefective against main tanks around 41, PTRD was just introduced, but didnt hold long either, but could be used against earilier mid class tanks or atleast their sides and sights then both, ofcourse against pillboxes and lightly armoured stuff
@@macdaniel6029 Yes, but it peters out around the Pzkw III which was becoming the mainstay, along with the Pzkw IV, of the panzerwaffe. By '42, you're needing bazookas/PIATs and 6lbr/57mm guns, and even they are starting to struggle.
@@LorenzoFerrari-d5e actually Germans have similiar antitank rifles. probably slightly better. but in the end (1942) Bazookas made a debut in North Africa. and it replaced Antitank Rfiles completely since mid-war tanks (since PzKfW3 and 4 onwards) are all harder. and aren't even affected by antitank rifles round anymore. (actually nearly immune to 37 or even 47 mm 'Antitank cannons' rounds as well, which once worked well against early war tanks.) it was then German Army introduced PzKfW6 'Tiger' which was a real heavy tank. something 75 / 76 mm rounds at that time can't do anything and it needed combined efforts of air attacks and artillery to put that tiger down.
yeah i have a family member that is damn near deaf from firing the m1 garand constantly without ear protection whilst in the military. Those anti-material rifles and firing tank rounds from inside a tank must have made some men 80% deaf at 60.
You could use it against tracks, vision blocks, or other breakables on the outside of the tank. Having said that, it's not something I'd want to be relying upon to stop a Panzer IV, a Panther, or a Tiger.
Interestingly, in Korea, US forces borrowed some Mk. I*'s from the Canadians, double-charged the powder, added a scope, and used it as a sniper's rifle. Effective range against infantry was reported as 2,000 yds/1.13 miles, or about 1,828 meters. Unofficially, I knew a Korean war vet that actually did this. They said the recoil "felt like it was ripping off your arm" but it was man-sized-target accurate to the roughly 1,200 yards he shot out to. Like most, he didn't see the point in something like this at the time.
@@calanon534 Recoil I can imagine. I've had the opportunity to fire a few prototype .50 Caliber Browning chambered rifles and felt like a crash test dummy. No muzzle brakes or Recoil pads. At least they weighed approximately 45lbs each.
The PTRD kept its effectiveness for a lot longer than the war. Allegedly, they're still being used by second-line units in the ongoing Russo-Ukranian war. They won't go through a tank anymore, but there's been reports that the Ukrainians have taken out a few Russian APCs and light armoured vehicles with PTRDs.
@@vernalc2449 Whoops. Sorry, got my wires crossed for a minute there. I was on to the instructional video portion and missed your reference to the cartoon. Thought you were talking about the gun. XD My bad, mate. I get where you were coming from now. Rest assured, I may be an idiot but I'm no MAGA cultist.
No longer useful against main battle tanks, but it can cause serious damage to their external equipment such as periscopes, optics sensors, tank treads, and machine guns. They can damage armored troop vehicles. What detail animation, impressive what they did with their hands instead of using CGI animation.
except for the unbridled propaganda! but i agree, the old video photography and even the old sound, and i am not even from no where near this era, i miss it!
I swear that Hitler's behaviour here is directly inspired by Charlie Chaplin's performance as Adenoid Hynkel ("The Great Dictator") - that nasal inhallation at 0:52 is pure Hynkel, as is the cod German gibberish.
no its a caricature of Hitler, he really did wave his arms about and shout a lot, and German was gibberish to most British and American audiences, particularly soldiers, don't forget who the audience for this vid was.
"Although useful against early German and Italian tanks in France and North Africa, such as the Panzer I, Panzer II and early models of Panzer III, increases in vehicle armour during the Second World War left the Boys largely ineffectual as an anti-tank weapon... and was phased out in favour of the PIAT hollow charge weapon mid-war." .
@@HappyDude1 In Normandy, an analysis by the British found that up to 7 % of all German tanks were knocked out by the Piat, it could penetrate up to 100 mm of steel however it was very inaccurate which was very important when firing at a Tiger to hit the right part of the tank. It was also found that German tanks that welded on extra steel plates on the sides which was popular on the Panzer mk IV, made the Piat ineffective.
I got the fire one once. And believe me once was enough. I was wearing earplugs in my ears are still ringing an hour later. It scared me I don't think I broke my shoulder. My shoulder is sore for 2 days. It makes you have real respect for the guys who had to use this thing every day.
I recall a tail from a video about the piat in a video game or movie, a commenter said their grandpa maybe? called it the best weapon of the war, as their arm was broken in training and he met his sweetheart in hospital, dodged the war and got a girl Edit; it was on The Armorer’s Bench, I think on paper tiger or warsaw 44 video, but i could be A bridge too far or the video game one
I would imagine that these cartoons would actually have been quite helpful to train AT squads effectively and quickly how the weapon works before real training would have commenced.
6:02 back then the tank featured here is Panzer 2 (there are so many models made, with different track bogie designs). 6:13 in the end REAL big guns are needed. Antitank rifles like this one only actually cripple them so bigger weapons will finish them off. rather than killing these tanks outright. later on. Bazookas and derivatives were proven better alternatives as it can actually destroy enemy tanks with their own ammunitions. The intro scene said its all. that artillery finished that Lastboss tank off.
And i think back to my childhood remember some adults saying you'll never learn anything from a cartoon. Well MY A**! I learned a lot from this one. Just as much as our voys did getting rwady to being shipped iff to fifht in WW2.
@@vortigaunt911 yes its a term used to describe a round that has more grain that normally exceeds its max pressure, .55 Boys is a modified 50BMG, theyre packed with more grain and the necks are expanded to fit the larger round
@@rogershapland5042 ah yes you can only gain any knowledge though direct experience. Good thing there aren't written records or audio recordings of the time. Otherwise we might learn something from the past.
@@Antichristakabeastof For sure, but those who were actually there were a far better source of information. Sadly, the days of first hand information are gone.
Came for the cartoon, stayed for the detailed instructions on how to operate and maintain the boys antitank rifle
lol me too
Helsing abridged: OH FUCK THAT'S AN ANTI TANK RIFLE ‼️
@@1badjesusHelsing abridged: OH FUCK THAT'S AN ANTI TANK RIFLE ‼️
Oh fuck that’s an anti tank rifle
@@Operatergaming How thick is this armor? well half is thick as my d¡ck so thick you need an anti tank rifle to peice it🤣🤣🤣🤣
"A rifle's like a woman. If you treat her right she will never let you down". I'll keep that in mind ;-)
A rifle is a woman, you can feed her , give her accessories, take her to nice places, treat her well... and she will still bust your eardrum if you aren't careful...
Also, she will bust your finger if it's where it isn't supposed to be.
Also, she can go anywhere for any reason.
Also, she looks nice in any color, except when hello kitty is involved
Also, can say the same thing in every language, no matter the language, with a single glance. Whether it be " I'm here for everyone" or " I'm here for YOU"
@@ricknerinfantry Amazing comment
@@ricknerinfantry I would love nothing more than a weapons with hello Kitty on it.
A rifle is like a women, is you throw one at your enemy, it will hurt them
keep well lubricated...
is nobody gonna talk about the smooth animation for the tracks a 5:58?
Looks like they use 3D animation but that wouldn’t come till years later that is really impressive
@@jabbersthekillerrabbit5057 mhmm!
@@jabbersthekillerrabbit5057 Maybe rotoscoping?
@@carolyns4519 hmmm didn’t think about that, that’s probably the case
back then framerate is very high. a hugh effort with cel animation technology. there were so many 'in between' animators in the studio. and yes with Dominion of Canada (and ultimately the British Empire) immense fundings. the immense labor needs are no problems.
And I think British Army would use these films primarily. despite that the weapon itself became obsolete too fast (and only Bazookas type weapons replace them. in case of Brits. PIAT replace it).
That animation for Hitler at the beginning is amazing.
Reminds me of SNL's gay Hitler.😆
@phxxr650r Lolll yeah with the pineapple 😂😂😂
Its amazing right
They made him spit when he talks just to show how bad he is.
That's Ward Kimball for ya!
The problem is that in 1942, the Allies knew the anti-tank rifle was worthless and had already discarded them in favor of the PIAT and the Bazooka.
Yea, the soviets liked em though
But only against German tanks everything else was still vulnerable. As were the Japanese tanks.
@@West_Coast_Mainline Yes but the Soviets did use them more as a sniper or counter sniper weapon. One such weapon ended the career of Finlands top sniper Simo Hayna
@@neiloflongbeck5705 Yes but a Ma Deuce could do it better. If a German Armored Car shows up I’d rather have the HMG than the AT rifle
@@mmarsh1972 if you like wasting ammunition.
2:00 shrek serves his country in WWII 1945 colorized
What are you doing in my country?!
Now listen! All you fairytale, Nazi, things...
@@chrismoore6668живу в своем мире.
@@Si-Fi.51ты хороший человек,но случай показал несостоятельность мыслеформы.
First one is about ukrainians attack Kursk region by nato weapons
The anti-tank rifle
loved by everyone except enemy vehicles and allied shoulders
Only shoulders. It was already useless by that time.
@@t___m what about mechanized vehicles and light tanks sure it wont go through a medium or heavy or MBT but if the vehicle had thin armour it could be pierced by it
around that time Germans introduced harder and bigger tanks -the likes of PzKfW3 and 4 - were introduced in increasing numbers and these were already more resilient to .55 rounds of these antitank rifles of these kind.. well some even marginalized the effectiveness of 37mm antitank guns already at this point. so these guns became useless against these. also in 1942 German Army introduced The Tiger tanks. which even capable to resist 47mm AP rounds! so Boys are nothing against them.
@@Ig_nis You could still take out a truck or half track, but you could do that with an LMG, let alone an M2. Some nationalities (Russia and I think Italy) used a 20mm AT rifle that was a fair bit more effective - though still out of date by mid war.
@DiscothecaImperialis the fact that you refferred to the Tiger 1 line of tank as "The Tigers" and made them out to be soke sort of mass produced main battle tank that saw a lot of tank-on-infantry fighting instead of being used as a very rare long distance self-propelled anti-tank gun as it actually was tells me everything i need to know about your knowledge of ww2 tanks. The fact you also went on to say "The Tigers" were immune to 47 mm guns only solidifies my belief that youre a dumbass and probably Italian. Who tf uses a 47 mm gun as a reference point? Not only was it only used by Italians and maybe Japanese at this point but the Tiger 1 was able to resist much bigger and more powerful guns at ranges it was actually used at, or even smalled ranges if the armor is angled slightly. The American 75 mm and soviet 76 mm could not penetrate the armor at 500 meters without hitting the same spot multiple times which would cause the armor to fail
Don't mind me, just watching some Canadian WWII training guide from 1942 for Canadian soldiers to use the Boys MK.I AT Rifle at 1:26 AM
can't blame ya, it's really good
Same
2 year late but same here just for funsies
Woah 1.30am I'm watching from ireland
for me it is 12:10
Funny thing, the sequence of Hitler throwing a tantrum was an accurate depiction of his final days.
You were there - tell us what it was like?
@@VanceJoudrey Hitler is a bitch
@@VanceJoudrey it’s on record
@@West_Coast_Mainlinewhat record?
@@VanceJoudrey I was there when you were conceived, and let me tell you, your dad ain't your real dad.
How to stop tanks: Place STOP signs. It works every time.
Also remove road signs ... They have to stop to break out maps ...
Русские пушки и русские танки останавливали любой немецкий танк,но противотанковое ружье показанное в фильме было у солдат РККА уже в июне 1941г
@@СергейУваров-ь4жWhy don't you take those guns to Ukraine? Oh you already have..
ruclips.net/user/shortsmvAmCSpAuQ4?si=2RyPV9JrSc9__KKl
@@СергейУваров-ь4жа РККА были более мощные ПТРД, а не это недоразумение, на момент выхода "мультика" которое уже надо было переименовать из противотанкового ружья во что-то другое
I love the Old show from the war thank you for keeping our history alive today thank you
1:24 turret bouncing that high gives a whole new meaning to the phrase "watch out for the turret monster" lol
T-72: Yeah we can relate to that
@@whirlwindeddie2124 You beat me to it.
T28 is actual turret monster
Keep the history alive
That tread animation was super high quality
"The Enemy is asleep, we'll give 'em the works!"
I mean, I don't WANT to say that was the very essence of The Blitzkrieg, but.
Exactly. I find it amazing the British were able to laugh in their situation. However, no amount of mockery could change the fact that German armor was no laughing matter.
Back in the day when Disney actually made stuff worth watching.
That’s dumb
@@animetalesseries What's 'dumb'? Disney? Yeah, I agree.
@@DCI_LeoDan_ the MCU isn’t worth watching? Moana isn’t worth watching? Encanto not worth watching? No I disagree, as does the rest of the world
@@animetalesseries What makes you think I care what you and the rest of "The World" thinks about anything?
@@DCI_LeoDan_ you should. Join the world
It do be wild that Disney and other major animating studio in America were making bangers like these
They were required to. This was an educational cartoon intended to be watched by soldiers during WWII. The US Government commissioned them to do a ton of propaganda and training cartoons.
I have a copy of the official instruction manual for this anti tank rifle left by my father from his WW11 service.
World War Eleven? 😊
@@pike100 He meant World War Aye Aye.
@@pinchespiderman I know that. I was just kidding the OP.
@@pike100 I know, man. I was rebounding off of your concept.
@@pinchespiderman World War Aye Aye: the first and only war to be strictly sailor v. sailor
"...improvements in vehicle armour during the Second World War left the Boys largely ineffectual as an anti-tank weapon. A shortened version was deployed in 1942 for issue to airborne forces and saw use in Tunisia, where it proved completely ineffective because of the reduced velocity caused by the shortened barrel. A further limitation was that the Boys rifle was relatively heavy and unwieldy to carry."
What about ПТРД?
Imagine you go against a Tiger with that gun. You could also just throw rocks at that point.
German tanks were tough as shit.
The only thing these guns could take down were light armor if they hit it in a good spot.
@@Alex-K94 In fairness it does say: "light armoured".
Well they have to be men.
@@And_Gas_pseudonymPTRD uses bigger cartridge that has a bit more than twice as much energy than .50cal
while BOYS became innefective against main tanks around 41, PTRD was just introduced, but didnt hold long either, but could be used against earilier mid class tanks or atleast their sides and sights
then both, ofcourse against pillboxes and lightly armoured stuff
In the words of ‘Dads Army’
“While we’re doing all that, what’s the tank going to be doing?”
The narrator reminds me of Sargeant Arthur Wilson. He talks all "posh"
“This is the Anti-Tank Rifle, it can penetrate tanks even from the front.”
*Loud incorrect buzzer.*
It can penetrate many tanks from the front: Pz. I, Pz. II, A7V, Mark 1...
@@macdaniel6029 Yes, but it peters out around the Pzkw III which was becoming the mainstay, along with the Pzkw IV, of the panzerwaffe. By '42, you're needing bazookas/PIATs and 6lbr/57mm guns, and even they are starting to struggle.
😏
Helsing abridged: OH FUCK THAT'S AN ANTI TANK RIFLE ‼️
@@rcgunner7086 I think that was the joke, that the tanks he just mentioned were lightly armored vehicles.
They need to get animators like this again. This is awesome hand drawn irs amazing
Why is this a better film than most modern movies
Crazy how hitler loved Disney films, but Disney made films making fun of him and teaching Americans how to destroy his tanks
Canadians
And Walt Disney was an anti-Semite.
"Teaching how to destroy his tanks" my guy there is basically not a single actual tank that would get damaged by the tank rifle
@@vornamenachname989 that is not true at all
You didn’t pay attention to the film 🇨🇦
6:39 this part is wild .
"I said a Man" 🤣
Shaming was used to increase performance, strength and conditioning.
That would be so embarrassing in a group. Especially if there are girls to
Older generations were so much more mature, now here is a cartoon describing an anti tank rifle
It's called war. The US government said you can either pick up a rifle or pick up a pencil, and I bet you can guess which the Disney animators chose.
This was made for soldiers not regular audiences.
Cartoons make learning fun, no matter the subject :)
it’s a fun way to get the message across.
my grandfather was 15 when he joined up so he may have enjoyed the cartoon may have been one of the first he ever saw
I amazed how good this animation looks!
I will always find the older animations, the most entertaining,
1:37 oh fuck that's an anti tank rifle,
OH FUCK THAT'S AN ANTI TANK RIFLE!!
And that was this moment that he knew... He fucked up.
@@LorenzoFerrari-d5e actually Germans have similiar antitank rifles. probably slightly better.
but in the end (1942) Bazookas made a debut in North Africa. and it replaced Antitank Rfiles completely since mid-war tanks (since PzKfW3 and 4 onwards) are all harder. and aren't even affected by antitank rifles round anymore. (actually nearly immune to 37 or even 47 mm 'Antitank cannons' rounds as well, which once worked well against early war tanks.)
it was then German Army introduced PzKfW6 'Tiger' which was a real heavy tank. something 75 / 76 mm rounds at that time can't do anything and it needed combined efforts of air attacks and artillery to put that tiger down.
@@DiscothecaImperialis
I know
Good old Helsing Abridged
Bitches love Cannons!
It blows my mind that dude is firing a .55 without hearing protection lol.
Man were made from steel back in the days😅
Even in the mid-1980s ear-pro was optional in the US Military.
Your hearing loss has not been determined to be service related.
yeah i have a family member that is damn near deaf from firing the m1 garand constantly without ear protection whilst in the military. Those anti-material rifles and firing tank rounds from inside a tank must have made some men 80% deaf at 60.
Probably blew his too if you catch my meaning
1:57
This Is The Official Debut Of The Short
For Sound Effect
Disney - SMALL BONK.
(1942).
That was Jimmy McDonald, they also reused it in “My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic” for the most part.
They should have showed flank shots. Being in the right place at the right time is the crux of anti tank rifle use.
0:37 Metal Slug
What?
Later in the war how effective were they against tracks, vision blocks and road wheels? I imagine if you could shoot a wheel you might shatter it?
You could use it against tracks, vision blocks, or other breakables on the outside of the tank.
Having said that, it's not something I'd want to be relying upon to stop a Panzer IV, a Panther, or a Tiger.
Interestingly, in Korea, US forces borrowed some Mk. I*'s from the Canadians, double-charged the powder, added a scope, and used it as a sniper's rifle. Effective range against infantry was reported as 2,000 yds/1.13 miles, or about 1,828 meters. Unofficially, I knew a Korean war vet that actually did this. They said the recoil "felt like it was ripping off your arm" but it was man-sized-target accurate to the roughly 1,200 yards he shot out to. Like most, he didn't see the point in something like this at the time.
@@calanon534 Recoil I can imagine. I've had the opportunity to fire a few prototype .50 Caliber Browning chambered rifles and felt like a crash test dummy. No muzzle brakes or Recoil pads. At least they weighed approximately 45lbs each.
I think they didn’t see service after 1943 during ww2
@@Assassinus2 projector infantry anti tank
I think the only anti-tank rifle that kept its effectiveness throughout the war was the PTRD.
The PTRD kept its effectiveness for a lot longer than the war. Allegedly, they're still being used by second-line units in the ongoing Russo-Ukranian war. They won't go through a tank anymore, but there's been reports that the Ukrainians have taken out a few Russian APCs and light armoured vehicles with PTRDs.
Nice now I know how to use an Anti Tank rifle. Thanks youtube
With just ONE substitution, that first cartoon could be about events happening in 2024, over EIGHTY YEARS after it was first made!
Well now I'm curious. What's the substitution?
@@angusmuir6180 Well, I'm NOT (curious); only those IN the magat #cult would have to ask
@@vernalc2449 Whoops. Sorry, got my wires crossed for a minute there. I was on to the instructional video portion and missed your reference to the cartoon. Thought you were talking about the gun. XD
My bad, mate. I get where you were coming from now. Rest assured, I may be an idiot but I'm no MAGA cultist.
@@angusmuir6180 oh, ok, gotcha.
No longer useful against main battle tanks, but it can cause serious damage to their external equipment such as periscopes, optics sensors, tank treads, and machine guns. They can damage armored troop vehicles.
What detail animation, impressive what they did with their hands instead of using CGI animation.
NHGから流れてきたやついるだろ
(。・_・。)ノはーい
くそ…
(^-^)/
(。・_・。)ノ
(˙꒳˙ก̀)ﾊｰｲ
I missed the time before it was all just computer animation. I mean, I understand it was really hard, but I mean it’s beautiful.
except for the unbridled propaganda! but i agree, the old video photography and even the old sound, and i am not even from no where near this era, i miss it!
1:42 - 2: 20 when world of tank players play War Thunder 😂
Exactly what it was like for me lmao
2:20
Damn, that tracks animation is so satisfying!
Back in days, this used to be a military training movie for the BOYS Mk.1 anti tank rifle.. unbelievable 😂😂😂..
This cartoon was so good it got its own TF2 voiceline!
I swear that Hitler's behaviour here is directly inspired by Charlie Chaplin's performance as Adenoid Hynkel ("The Great Dictator") - that nasal inhallation at 0:52 is pure Hynkel, as is the cod German gibberish.
no its a caricature of Hitler, he really did wave his arms about and shout a lot, and German was gibberish to most British and American audiences, particularly soldiers, don't forget who the audience for this vid was.
Thank that man's shoulder for its service.
If nuclear bombs were invented before WWII we would get Fallout animation tutorials.
That would be bad... the guns would be Frankenstein things. It would be funny though.
look for nuclear precautions vids many are cartoon
Bruno Ganz was stellar in this movie!!!
Scrolling past a cartoon vulture holding a Boys AT rifle wasn't on my bingo card today
To speak gratitude is courteous and pleasant, to enact gratitude is generous and noble, but to live gratitude is to touch Heaven.
"Although useful against early German and Italian tanks in France and North Africa, such as the Panzer I, Panzer II and early models of Panzer III, increases in vehicle armour during the Second World War left the Boys largely ineffectual as an anti-tank weapon... and was phased out in favour of the PIAT hollow charge weapon mid-war."
.
Could the piat destroy a tiger?
@@HappyDude1 In Normandy, an analysis by the British found that up to 7 % of all German tanks were knocked out by the Piat, it could penetrate up to 100 mm of steel however it was very inaccurate which was very important when firing at a Tiger to hit the right part of the tank.
It was also found that German tanks that welded on extra steel plates on the sides which was popular on the Panzer mk IV, made the Piat ineffective.
The tankers are always wondering where the anti-tank gun is, but none of them ask how the anti-tank gun is?
Как говорили в СССР - стреляй по танку из ружья, если хочешь, чтобы экипаж умер от сквозняка.
Понятно теперь откуда совки спёрли.
@@alexeyseregin3966, что сперли?
@@phosphorus2204 глаза протрите.
I got the fire one once. And believe me once was enough. I was wearing earplugs in my ears are still ringing an hour later. It scared me I don't think I broke my shoulder. My shoulder is sore for 2 days. It makes you have real respect for the guys who had to use this thing every day.
"We are being oppressed" the most pronounced sentence within 2023-2024
Well in all fairness they have definitely put @nti-$emitism back on the map recently
Don’t forget “it’s not fair!”.
Dont forget "its an outrage!"
@siameckerjr @ih8gordon
Don't forget "Take a seat, young Skywalker."
Back when cartoons would have everyone want to watch them.
Looks real soothing on the shoulder when firing
0:43 lookin like my pookie bear
Yeah
Pretty much
Just a load of nonsense in German
Might have read out the local takeaway menu
he looks hungry for some countries
I am a German Bavarian decent person I love it, it's actually very extremely hilarious and classic.
The recoil looks painful! Pretty sure the shoulders would be sore after a few rounds.
You should see the PIAT
I recall a tail from a video about the piat in a video game or movie, a commenter said their grandpa maybe? called it the best weapon of the war, as their arm was broken in training and he met his sweetheart in hospital, dodged the war and got a girl
Edit; it was on The Armorer’s Bench, I think on paper tiger or warsaw 44 video, but i could be A bridge too far or the video game one
Yeah ouch, the days before recoil dampeners. A Barrett it is not.
They only get 5?
saturday mornings were differrent than i remember
2:28 DICE and BFV playerbase
Yes! I was thinking the same thing...
“Too many BOYS AT rifles!”
Yes I agree as a bfv player the boys at rifle sucks and it shouldn’t be used as sniper rifles
I hate idiots who just camp with the Boys AT
MUSIC FROM THE THREE LITTLE WOLVES
No excrement Walt
This has gotta be the most accurate depiction of Canada I’ve ever seen
Billy Bletcher, in his natural voice, voiced the Devil, while the narrator is voiced by Peter Carter Page.
And Walt Disney himserlf added the cow's voice at 14:43.
I love how the exact maximum range is censored by a loud gunfire
中の人げぇみんぐから来ますた
奇遇ですね！自分もですw
NO,75和 同じく
なんかちょっとトムとジェリー感感じる
NO,75和 僕もーー
同じくNHGから
I miss cartoons like this
i got bored and found this at 12:21AM
12:10 am for me
Same
Just think. All you had to do was get within 100 yards of a moving tank that is working in conjunction with infantry. What could be easier.
Ironically the Boys anti tank rifle became quickly obsolete.
I would imagine that these cartoons would actually have been quite helpful to train AT squads effectively and quickly how the weapon works before real training would have commenced.
総統自ら前線で指揮とるの最高司令官の鑑
実際はアニメのようにはならなかった模様
🤮🤮Adolf Hetler🤮🤮🤮🤮
@@gassanbehno8748 Владимир зеленский😁
１号戦車A型っぽくて好き。
冒頭の戦車、ハッキュンやら色々混じってた印象やなぁ…。
素晴らしい映像資料ですよね。
Beautiful animation wow
I've fired one of those before. A lot of fun, but damn does it kick.
Service Rifle: Lee Enfield Number 4 Mark 1 .303 British
The orchestra are lit though
4:40 100 yards! You better not miss become it will be rolling on your quick!
Thx for posting, I don't think this will be added to Disney plus anytime soon.
the wooOO here ( 2:04 ) is the same used for casey jr in dumbo
Edit: it may be a bit lower pitch but its very simaler
That is some smooth fragmentation animations for something before computer generated simulations.
Nice anti material rifle
You know that your equipment is headed for the junkyard when your training film is telling you that a feature (rear sight) is already obsolete.
And that's how grandpa went deaf.
PARDON🦻
I remember this cartoon as a kid.
I’m having serious bf5 AT rifle sniper flashbacks right now
If you made it just 1 second longer, Polish viewers would be so grateful.
6:02 back then the tank featured here is Panzer 2 (there are so many models made, with different track bogie designs).
6:13 in the end REAL big guns are needed. Antitank rifles like this one only actually cripple them so bigger weapons will finish them off. rather than killing these tanks outright.
later on. Bazookas and derivatives were proven better alternatives as it can actually destroy enemy tanks with their own ammunitions.
The intro scene said its all. that artillery finished that Lastboss tank off.
And i think back to my childhood remember some adults saying you'll never learn anything from a cartoon. Well MY A**! I learned a lot from this one. Just as much as our voys did getting rwady to being shipped iff to fifht in WW2.
Just so you know despite being a larger and hotter round than the 50BMG it was still ineffective against light Japanese tanks
Hotter? What?
@@vortigaunt911 yes its a term used to describe a round that has more grain that normally exceeds its max pressure, .55 Boys is a modified 50BMG, theyre packed with more grain and the necks are expanded to fit the larger round
Wow. Been there, done that, eh. You'd have to be getting close to 100 years old to know that.
@@rogershapland5042 ah yes you can only gain any knowledge though direct experience. Good thing there aren't written records or audio recordings of the time. Otherwise we might learn something from the past.
@@Antichristakabeastof For sure, but those who were actually there were a far better source of information. Sadly, the days of first hand information are gone.
Yup! I remember watching this when I was 7 or 8 years old! Lol 😆
I wonder if they made a French version for French-Canadian units.
They did, none of them were ever fired and were only dropped once.
@@chadrichardson1687 Plenty of French-Canadian units fought with gallantry and distinction, show some respect and educate yourself.
@@sErgEantaEgis12 Could be that they meant that the rifles were never used.
I typically think of the .50 Cal. M82 Barrett when I think of anti-armour…
Американцы прекрасно воевали..... в кино и мультфильмах
😂😂
Very TRUE
..NOT SO MUCH NOW
7:57 Forward to Attack, Back and Safe to Pack, got it.
14:42
Curly- "I'll look where I'm shooting (sticks out tongue)."
Ma l'addestramento lo facevano coi cartoni animati?Non ci posso credere.
Your awesome and love classic cartoon