ZeroFunctional I felt I needed some other opinions. Haha! Only Dylan knew what I was talking about. He really is an expert because he can hear the difference.
Just saw this - some 6 years later. Brilliant! What the people talking about a few cents either way don't seem to grasp is that music is not a single note, it is the resonance of harmonics. Shape of the room, even the moisture in the air can subtlety alter this. Let's tune the room, not the minutia! Go Rick!
This is the best video I’ve ever seen on A 432 versus A 440 comparison! I especially like the way that the experts weighed in right at the end. Brilliant Rick!
Mr. Quail, are you out there? I'm a music theorist, and I've tried twice to relay a statement to you but each time, my very words were simplly, and somehow made to be gone. I"m trying make by wording more ambiguous in hopes of by-passing the you-know-what.
I absolutely love everything about how my guitar sounds and FEELS/RESPONDS; even through the amp, when tuned to my preferred Ab/Drop Db = 432Hz. However, considering nearly every piece of recorded music that i grew up listening to; and still do, was recorded using A = 440Hz(or some variation of it), so learning/jamming along with pre-recorded music or friends, is impractical. But my love of 432Hz has nothing to do with any mystical, cosmic, or devine theories. I can only say that when my guitar is tuned to Ab/Db = 432Hz, it just sounds, feels, and responds in a much more "relaxed" way. Not so tense/intense. If that makes any sense.
I like half step flat alot on my classical because it's mellowed out and more rich sounding. I am also going to try A 432 and half step flat from there. I wonder if the strings will sound floppy. . .
432 is much more mathematically clean. 3 x 12 x 12 = 432. Generally, when I'm modding games, I like multiples of 12, because 12 is in common with both base 3 and base 2 and has crossovers with base 8. Idk, I just like base 12. It's a really nice number. In music, it probably doesn't matter. Most people don't even appreciate the instrumentation of a song, let alone are able to hear a 1.8% difference in pitch.
@@manictigerinteresting! Western music is divided into 12 notes. So is time, clocks and calendars. And we used to use the imperial measurement system 12inch = 1ft etc
I've listened to comparisons of the two (432 and 440), and for some reason the 432 does sound more calm and relaxing to me. I think it might just be because it's a slightly lower tone, thus sounds more mellow when set beside a 440 sample. Throughout school, I was a trumpet player, and we always tuned *A* to 440. We had a tuning machine that you would stand in front of and play an A, and it had little dials on it that would "freeze" when the note was just right - very much like the record player strobe light tuner on a turntable. In fact, it was the same color. But when put side by side, I do like the 432 better - again, I think, because it's just a slightly lower tone giving it a more "bass" sound.
I think it's because it's a natural set of frequencies when you can equally divide 12 from 432 (36). But when you do 440/12, it's an uneven calculation. I'd love to get my hands on an old flute that is actually tuned to 432. Some European orchestras actually do have recordings of Haydn & other classical symphonies on period instruments in 432 or 435 tuning.
@@rlopezflute I know there were so many thousand musicians who were trying to oppose a 440. I seem to remember middle C being tune to a 432 through the 80s. Then, it seem to me that C was changing into C sharp. Little by little by little, Noticed a 440 becoming more and more prevalent.
@@missyhilary8905 @Missy and Hilary Sisters it's weird, some orchestras here in the US even tune to 441. My piccolo & alto flutes are tuned to 442 because they were made in Germany & Japan, which tune their instruments higher. I have to pull the headjoints out more in ensemble, but not as much when I'm playing alone. I kind of prefer 442 to 440 because the airs comes out a little easier.
It's exactly that, sounds warmer because it is lower. If you'll compare A 432 with for example A 420 - then A 420 will be warmer... And we can go on like this. No magic here :)
Rick, I love your videos and I was wondering if you could make a video explaining George Russell's lydian chromatic concept and its application in jazz composition. Thank you.
that is not a good idea unless you are using a toy piano. you should play slayer on two pianos, one for each hand and each foot and tune them to A 333 hz
I like to approximate 432 on acoustic guitar for a few reasons, mainly string tension on "long scale"(25.5") instruments. Tuning down a full half-step seems just a bit too flat, 432 just seems warmer to my ears...
@@ThePhreakass Maybe what you call tone deaf is actually the better music but we've listened to 440 for so long we think it's vice versa. Just a thought, no use in acting like we have all the answers because the world would be perfect if we did. If you don't like 432 hz that's fine but there's no use in being evangelical about something we only know on the surface level.
I agree with Lennon. I moved to 432 Hz just because it seems a little richer in tone and seems to make slight intonation problems less noticeable. It's no big deal to me because all my gigs are solo. I keep a Strat tuned to 440 Hz, just in case you want to jam.
Sexagesimal second have 6.000 years. To discuss the seconds and the measurement of time and space based on the rounded seconds for the Hertz, before, we need to understand the sexagesimais origins of the second. Each turn of the clock has 43,200 slices, or seconds. And the number 60 is not a random choice. 60 is the smallest number with the largest number of connections: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 12, 15, 20, 30 and 60. We don't invent mathematics, we just discover the relationships between the quantities, and give them names. That's why I reaffirm that to understand the relationship between the number 432 and the sexagesimal mandala of 60, we need to understand its origins in mathematics, geometry and cosmology.
Good Morning. You are out of context, my friend... The 12 hour time has nothing to do with the sexagesimal degree nor hertz. The sexagesimal degree is one sixth of a semitone, but one semitone is different from another in hertz. You are confused, the dashboard of an analog clock is based on the Margarita Chart, and the Absolute Harmonic Circle is also based on the Margarita Chart... But hertz has nothing to do with cartography...!!! The XOANS Theorem offers more than a hundred axioms that support it. And one of them is: - "The INDIGO vibrates in A440" . Demonstrative argument: The spectrum or decomposition of the SUNLIGHT has seven colors, and each one responds with an absolute vibratory affinity. The Pacific Blue is an energy whose photons vibrate and move in an AS and a SOUND. And that SOUND is immutable and eternal, always in 440 Hz. Pythagoras did not know about Hertz, but he did effectively handle the TONE very well in the context of Greek music. Therefore, A is an immutable Natural Tonality, since it is the vibratory affinity of the AS of PACIFIC BLUE photons in the Solar Spectrum
Dear sir, this standardization issue is a bit of a "red herring" in that it supposes that the frequency that A is mapped to is really important, but as you point out for centuries (perhaps millennia) to exactly map a master tuning frequency to 440 Hz would have been impossible without modern science. So how did they tune at all? For guitarists this an important point and leads us to the 6th, and the difference between natural tuning and equal temperament and Das wohltemperierte Klavier (The well-tempered Clavier) by Bach and the differences in the fractions that make up Natural tuning (for instance tuning a guitar or piano to an open chord such as G Major or E Major versus Standard tuning. When tuned to the single Major Chord, as one goes around the Circle of Fifths, the 6ths begin to detune due to the fractions used in relation to the key center. Meanwhile in Standard or Equal Temperament, the division between half-steps is constant, and thus as one goes around the Circle of Fifths (no matter what key one is in), the "out-of-tuneness" is spread across all semitones as opposed to being solely centered on the 6th. If I am not mistaken, this also is the source of differences in notation on enharmonic notes, and the use of sharps when ascending and flats when descending for historical purposes. And finally, it took the three strings of a harpsichord or piano to really center in on equal temperament. Electronically, due to the fact that sine waves produced by electricity do not have inherent overtone artifacts unless they are deliberately designed in, we can have any mapping we desire, but it won't sound "as real" until the proper odd and even harmonics are added. Just my two cents. Great video
432 is so much easier and natural for me to sing to , also 432 is very calming , I put it on before bed and during work commute traffic and within minutes I am calm relaxed and happy
killavenger he has said that he hears a kind of mixture of two tones, meaning A and A# simultaneously when hearing a sharper A, each note getting more noticeable the closer to the actual pitch they hold they are.
@ please go listen to some Pythagorean tuned music, and I don't mean the ambient music, I mean music with somewhat complex harmony, it sounds like utter crap, no music where the ratio of the major third is 81/64 will sound good
432 is much better for meditation music and songwriting, I used to be sceptical but I have done a LOT of comparison and I don't think it's just a placebo and there could have been a conspiracy. I think Rick is being a bit glib with his dismissal here.
Even if water reacts differently to 432 hz, tuning music down to that frequency will only effect water (or anything else) when that particular octave of A is played. Music changes chords, pitch, and tones constantly. Unless the entire song is just one long A note, it's not really going to realign your chakra or whatever.
I had never heard of 432 vs 440 until somebody I hardly knew randomly sent me a video addressing it a year ago. It was an interesting video. A little bit new agey but interesting enough that I decided to try it. Lo and behold when I started singing it did seem like some ethereal static that I had subconsciously always fought against had been removed! Last month I did my first gig in a while and definitely asked the band to all tune at 432 Hz. Of course my mind was occupied with all the details of doing a show so I really forgot completely all about the fact that we had tuned down at 432. No question for the whole night I was kind of marveling over the way my vocals sat so comfortably on top of the mix!? That doesn’t happen a lot. Also the instruments were never fighting against each other. Each instrument seemed to have comfortable space. And we were not too loud. We were not un-loud But we were not too loud. I could see people still able to converse with each other even though we were playing at a decent volume. It was a few days before it occurred to me that it might’ve had something to do with us performing at 432HZ. I know there’s lots of snarkiness and mockers and scoffers around this idea. Lol… And may be 440 is/was more appropriate for our beloved rock ‘n’ roll era that was aggressive and harsh from the get-go. But as for me I love playing and singing at 432. My two cents! Great RUclips channel Rick thank you!
Interesting post. I find that 440Hz- 442Hz makes the notes in the 12-TET scale sit rather high in resonance in the throat.. Move pitch down to 432Hz and most notes just seem to hover at my voices relaxed state.. And singing high in my upper middle register C4 to E4 becomes much more comftable.. In fact the passaggio E4 might be the most tricky note for my voice.. Move pitch down to 431Hz that E4 becomes so much easier to find the balance..
It sounds like your voice benefits from a lower tuning. But my guess is that it's not necessarily A=432. The same relaxation would probably come from tuning to A=434 or A=431. If it works for you though, go with it.
@@esterhammerfic I tried with many tunings.. I tried A4=430Hz and I find it a little too low when I hit my lower chest register.. The sweet-spot for my voice is around 434Hz..
I have a theory on these 2 tuning systems. I think if our tuning system had been in 432, the world would be a better place... it's a fascinating "what-if" thought that i often have, although it's impossible. It's still fun to hear comparisons. There's something different about 432 tuning that draws you in. And this is coming from someone who has perfect pitch in 440. It's taken a while to get used to 432.
One day has 86400 seconds... 432/864... That´s in line / sync with everything - the whole cosmos. That is why sensitive people feel that. But in our dumbed down society it´s all just nuts... Mankind is ignorant like...
@@vectragt2310oh wow, I didn't know about the seconds of rhe day. I do know that 432/12 = 36, but what is interesting is 440/12 =36.666 🧐 No wonder so many musicians have anxiety &/or are depressed! And that includes myself. If we're constantly exposed to unequal frequencies, it's doing something to us physically & emotionally. I wish more research was done on this.
@@rlopezflute 432/8 = physical 432/9 = spiritual / Ether side And yes, 440 was put in place on purpose... Also, no further investigation needs to be done if people learn to follow their intuiton and heart/earth.
@@vectragt2310 One day has 85.984,091 seconds, we just rounded it down to 24 hours. Also, a day is not the same in the whole cosmos, only our Earth day is roughly 24 hours. Stop trying to be smart as if 432Hz is in tune with the universe or something, it isn't even in tune by your own standards.
@@RoderickVoordouw Well, then I made an incorrect statement. In line with earth and its frequency, as we ARE ON EARTH. And with 440 you are out of sync and it is not coincidence this became western standard. There won´t be a direct effect from listening to 432, but over time when it would be all over the radio, etc. DNA and concioussness would change. As you surely know DNA is dynamic. So stop trying to tell bs...
I think all of this goes out the window once you start dealing with vocals. A persons vocal range is determined by the shape of their body. When I decide to do a cover song I do it in what ever key works for my voice. So it really doesn't matter what my guitar is tuned to.
I tried out the 432hz tuning on my guitar, and well at first I noticed a difference, once my ear became use to it, it started sounding normal. then tuning back with 440hz it sounded out, but soon after it sounded normal. it was a little like playing a song using flats, it sounds weird at first, but also somewhat more mellow and relaxing, but depending on the notes, it can also sound silent hill creepyish.
Thats because it doesn't matter what frequency you start A as. In 12 tone equal temperament tuning, its all whole ratios anyways. We have A=440 today because of a centuries long loudness war. The higher A (with the same music piece) the louder/brighter it sounds, the lower the A the warmer, softer it sounds. Louder == Better. A has been anywhere between 380hz and 500hz depending on the era, composer, instrument, people, etc. We have old tuning forks for pretty much everything in between too. 440 was just chosen because its good enough, 'loud' but still manageable by traditional string instruments without breaking stuff. The war continued when compression was invented. . .
I heard years ago that 440a was made so we would be forced into a more discordant type vibration overall concerning the music. Just something I'd heard in past, kind of like fluoride and other things people claim were introduced to not help us. I'm sure others have heard the same thing. Rick I dig your videos, all of them! 🎸
We have the Rockefellers to thank for enforcing 440 Hz as standard. They also gave us the brutal American public school system and helped fund the rise of the Third Reich. Go figure.
i was never convinced the 432 Hz was some miracle frequency so i thoroughly enjoyed this video - having said that, i still think the issue of energetic frequency in music is a profound subject - i would argue that the only so-called 'frequency' that truly matters would have to do with the unique character of the music itself
Very good thank you !! I learned a bit about this subject playing with a french accordianist that had an old accordian instrument tuned in this way, A =435; You surely put more light on the subject with a few things i didn't know. Thank you Rick for the cool vids!!
Notes A3=216Hz (-31.77 cents) and G#3=204Hz (-30.7 cents),, just lay completely natural to my voice.. The ~ 30 cents lift from ~432Hz to 440Hz for A4 is not natural for my voice... MY voice relaxed resonance is around the tuning of A4 at 432Hz.. Singing high notes comes very natural when the guitar is tunes at 432Hz vs 440Hz.. The passaggio is shifted too high at 440Hz Infact the highest pitch for my voice if I lay of a lot of weight (early transition) is ~438Hz (~8 cents). A4=440Hz is very difficult to find the balance in the throat.. In my world 440Hz excludes a lot of voices in music.. The previous european pitch at 435Hz is a better comprimise between a high (445Hz) and low pitch (425Hz). A4=424-425Hz would be close to Mozats and Händels pitch as they used a forks at A4=421.6 and 422.5Hz but they were probably using a more "pure" tuning system like meantone or just intonation which was much more common which sets the A (major six. or La) note flatter relative to 12-TET in the C major scale. I think it was a piano tuning company from late 1800s that had their pianos tuned in Meantone at 433.5Hz for A4 and with 12-TET is was A4=436Hz. A difference of ~10 cents. A tenor hitting the high notes to Händels halleluja to a piano tuned to 425Hz would be easy, nice and full.. At modern A4=442-443Hz which many like to tune their classical instruments at .. The tenor sounds bad... It is only the spinto tenors (very few individuals) that would sing the high part with ease... We got it all wrong,, The previous pitch at 435Hz is as high the note of A4 should have gone to get the right classical division of fachs.. This is a fact...440Hz is a very "unnatural" singing pitch if I may use that word.
dansk björn 440 is unnatural to your body, and it is to mine as well - but my body is more comfortable around 450. The tiny bit of extra sharpness really helps me maintain consitant intonation. Conversely, I have an old bass trumpet that doesn't tune any higher than 430 - and I prefer to play it around 425. Every body and every instrument is different, and you gotta do what works best for you and for your equipment!
424-425/449-450hz as a nice spot i completely can relate to. it is another nice area together with the 432/457hz area. what is your vocal fach when singing.. the weirdest pitch area for my voice is 439-445hz. not low enough and not high enough
The 19th-Century composer Giuseppe Verdi reportedly liked 432-Hz tuning because his opera singers’ voices lasted a lot longer. Nothing mystical about that. 1/3 of 1/2 of a step lower than 440 Hz seems barely noticeable to the average ear, but I guess that somebody who pushes their vocal ability to its limits for a good length of time would consider it a gift. 👂🏼🎹
i'd like to hear A432 compared to other alternative tunings, like A420 or something like that. My doubt is: is the relaxing effect due to just lowering frequency, or do 432 resonates better than higher and lower tunings?
I like your videos (even though they often go over my head and make me cry like an infant at my own ineptitude, leaving me wanting to: 432 part quit to 440 part get on my instrument). This was so informative and cheeky at the same time. It made a potentially dry subject fun to watch. This has been my favorite so far!
Explanation is very simple. They are just making money. On almost every website discussing how 432 Hz is better you will find CDs for sale (at least this is how it was 10 years ago when all that nonsense started).
what conspiracy theories are you talking about? no one is talking about conspiracy theories here yet you, a bunch of lazy wankers, are doing just that! You are the ones who are crazy not those who discover the truth about the world we live in :) Let me repeat this :) YOU ARE THE ONES WHO ARE CRAZY :) Deal with that :)
440hz throws off our vibration and disconnects us from source. Hence why they made it the standard in 1932. Just another example of how everything in life today is backwards from how it was meant to be.
I think I have a negative effect to 440. Life somebody"ruffling my feathers".You made much more clear as to get people to understand these concepts. Physics was one of my favorite subjects in highschool but still how does this translate to practice, real life,how can I choose to tune my guitar to 432Hz?
Western music in equal temperament uses 12 different frequencies, only one of which is a multiple of the frequency of A : the A itself. A piece in Eb major tuned at 432Hz will contain no A at all, so no instance of a note vibrating at that 432Hz frequency. This should be enough to debunk the 432 Hz bullshit.
I like singing in A432 for the same reason I like tuning to Eb. It's easier to hit high notes. But it's a hassle tuning back and forth when I play with other people, recordings or RUclips so I just play in A440 99.9% of the time.
Cycles per second weren't specifically measured until the year 1834 when the Savart Wheel and the Tonometer where invented, but because the metric system came out in 1795, music was accurate; even more so, relatively, than most people today with tuners. They knew, then, the note range for any given length of tube for a horn or a pipe organ to get different notes for transposition. The earliest development known for the metric system is from John Wilkins. In 1668, he proposed a coordinated system of units of measure for length, area, volume, and mass. This means that people knew what they were tuning and building their instruments to for more than half of the Baroque Era and all of the Classical Era. Things are generally accepted before they become standardized, but even if instrument makers didn't know the Hertz value, the metric system is defined as being derived from nature. So, like I've explained, instrument makers, then, knew the acoustical output of instruments based on the shapes and sizes of natural objects through simple observation. They might not have had tuners, but Europeans knew how to trace and compare lengths precisely since before they came out of caves. Perception is rooted in nature and the observation of it consciously. This is why your son sang a 33 and a third cent wide quarter tone. Let me explain; he had to hear when one note range started and the other one ended. 448 Hz tuning actually sounds 1/3 of a note flat, 440 Hz sounds 1/3 of a note sharp, and 432 Hz, being 40 octaves lower than the calibration of primary and secondary visual colors within a 12 tone system, sound balanced. Stay with me, now. He sang the note up past 448 Hz tuning and touched 456 Hz tuning (the next note up from 432 Hz) and in doing so, he then brought it down to where the note would sound so flat that it couldn't be confused with being the same note compare to the commercial standard of tuning. Take a look at this repeating pattern rooted in the conscious awareness of the complete range of any "A" (Orange) that is 40 octaves lower than the THz range of the visible colors Red through Yellow: •flat = 400 Hz = Ab = Raspberry-Red +8 Hz •in-tune = 408 Hz = Ab = Red +8 Hz •sharp = 416 Hz =Ab = Orange-Red + 8 Hz •flat = 424 Hz = A = Red-Orange +8 Hz •in-tune = 432 Hz = A = Orange +8 Hz •sharp = 440 Hz = A = Yellow-Orange +8 Hz •flat = 448 Hz = A# = Orange-Yellow +8 Hz •in-tune = 456 Hz = A# = Yellow +8 Hz •sharp = 464 Hz = A# = Lime-Yellow We are dealing with microtones, here, but compared to the World War tuning, in-tune is flat; flat is sharp (as the next note down); and, (as sharp as any note can be before it is in the next range of color) is in-tune. Understanding this will have you realize that 440 Hz came about to make music sound sharp. It is better to sound sharp than out of tune, but that is just 440 Hz, not 442 Hz or 445 Hz. I hope that this explains some of the weird theories that claim that 432 Hz can expand your awareness. It sure could help you to understand and develop perfect pitch. Thank you for taking the time to read all of this.
This discussion pops up a lot!The long list of pseudocience/spirituality stuff you reeled off makes me laugh for sure haha. It's clear there can't be a superior system in regards to anything like that, because resonances of physical bodies will never be consistent. Also, any significance of the number 432 is entirely arbitrary like you explained. Besides, that's just one single frequency of one single note whilst music contains the full spectrum!When people push such reasons in support of 432, they tend to show a fundamental misunderstanding of how sound works - throwing around words like resonance, harmonics, overtones, without realising that all these things remain consistent, just slightly lower. Their points could be used to argue for tuning systems like Just Intonation vs 12EDO, but 12EDO vs 12EDO slightly lower is really irrelevant. Tune to whatever :) As a rule of thumb lower will sound a bit calmer for sure. I liked Jacob Colliers modulation from 440 to 432 as it displays that effect very well.
Before i discovered that there was a literal debate over this i first noticed when listening to some heavy metal/rock records that they sounded off when i tried to jam along to them and figured it must be like a 'quarter step down' using my ear and ended up with 430hz and have had my floyd rose set up in this particular tuning for a few years now. it sucks having to detune every single (almost) song i wanna jam to haha but you will find that lots of mechanical/electronic/harmonic tones you will hear in your day to day life will resonate with this tuning! i think that must be where the whole 'freq of the universe' stuff came from...
:) lol, I get to the same point with very few words, but this has to be one of the best responses to this debate/dilemma, whatever it is to whomever, that I have ever heard. Winning!!!
The difference of 440Hz to 432Hz is 1.8 percent. If you play a cheap acoustiv guitar for some time, you will start at 440Hz and end at 432Hz. The BIG benefit of the cheap guitar: you get all cosmic tunes between 440Hz and 432Hz. Doing this, you may find the secret frequency of the universe!
since music frequencies are logarithmic you cannot compare them in prtcentage which is linear, for A4 at 432 vs 440 it is approximately 1/3 of a half tone, that 1/3 of a half tone increases in percentage as go move to higher frequencies 😊
I like to play Mozart and Beethoven (and Bach, I guess) at a semitone lower than today's concert pitch, and Chopin a semitone higher. BUT there's more to it than that: it's of more importance to use a non-equal tuning, so the different chords have different sounds from each other. I love the way even my Yamaha digital piano comes to life by using Werckmeister - with the C chords sounding so different from the Bs, the Gs sounding so different from the Aflats etc A semitone up or down either way doesn't really make that much difference to many people.
Would "perfect tempo" be like being able to tap, say, 44.73 beats per minute accurately? I don't think this exists, but if it did, I would assume it would be parallel to perfect pitch, and would have a contrasting relative tempo. People without perfect pitch come close by using relative pitch, so they keep in mind a particular note and figure out the interval between the given pitch and the note - relative tempo would be achieved by say, listening to your watch ticks and knowing what 60 BPM sounds like, then you tap a rhythm at 60 BPM that gives you some other rhythm (if you tap dotted quarter notes at 60 BPM, you get 45 BPM - if you tap half notes at 60 BPM, you get 30 BPM - you can work out most tempos by doing a process like this). It's a starting point, but I would imagine it's not possible to be _that_ accurate at memorizing tempo.
Paul Sampson for mammals, that's roughly 1.5 million heartbeats Yep, bizarrely enough, our organs have finite operating limits, just like the things we manufacture. Sobering thought.
After all I've read and heard about this issue, I agree with Rick, if tuning to 432 rocks your boat, do it. But IMHO, it what people play and their sound that takes great precedence over just it's pitch, when listening. Their choice of notes, as well as the relationship to each other, no matter what the pitch one's tuned to, is a greater factor in whether I feel the music is transcendent, calming, healing, or jarring, agitated, even violent. Playing crappy music can't be overcome simply by tuning to 432. And listening to music is so very subjective anyway, takes me back to saying just do what sounds best to you...
Caleb English I answered one of the 2 questions I get asked everyday. The other is people telling me that they can develop PP as adults. I did however make a new style thumbnail :)
Well I'm just loving every bit of both of these channels. I got excited and the words flew out of my keyboard. Hope it didn't come across as disrespectful. Thanks again for the awesome content!
Hey Rick, I just LOVE 432 and 448 hertz tuning. 440 pitches sound really aggressive to me in comparison (did a lot of blind testing). Coldplay, Melody Gardot and the Vienna Philharmonic have liked it too :) Cheers
I've just stumbled upon something truley interesting. People believed that 432hz was resonant with 8hz (which was considered the harmonic resonance of the earth) ... until.. we developed fine instruments to determin it was really 7.83 which would make the A frequency 430.65. I didn't care to much about all the nonsense until i actually listened to a piece of music in 430.65 and it actually created this unusual humming sensation in my body. The closest thing i can descride it as, is the feeling i would get if i smoked a hit off of a joint. Not to get too hippy-like but it really felt like love was pumping through my body. But when i went back to 440hz music, it seemed to slightly intensify a slight headache i had from earlier in the day. Weird stuff.
What kills the 432 havinmg any sort of " spiritua;l " effect on a guitar is the equal temperment . You can adjust the fundamental tuning , however it still aint right !
My family has always been a very musical family my mother was a musician in a band so I grew up in a very musical family in general. But when I started listening to music at 4:32 Hertz I noticed that all of my headaches stopped happening and that I was able to sleep more peacefully cuz I listen to a lot of music when you listen to music at a higher Hertz ratio your brain can only download sound vibrations at a certain frequency level. So if you are constantly listening to music at a higher frequency level it can overwhelm your sensory ability in your brain and can make you feel depressed and sleepy. I don't believe in any of the chakra crap that the new age people are pushing. I understand that frequencies at high levels can be used to affect the brain in very negative ways back during the Cold War we had some of our soldiers had high-frequency weapons used on them and it eventually drove them insane and killed them. So listening to something at a high frequency can have a very bad impact on your mental and physical health my dad works for the US Army and designed microwave emitters that vibrate the molecules of the person's body causing excruciating pain. When I asked him about the Hertz issue that everyone's talking about. He looked at me and said very clearly don't listen to anything outside of 432 I said why. He said because if you listen to higher frequencies they can mess with you over time. This is a guy who got the highest level on the ASVAB in the US Army than anyone in US Army history. Who literally designed a piece of equipment that can blow you up from the inside out. I myself have an IQ of 160 so I'm not stupid. After doing my research I have realized that higher frequencies do impact the brain they do impact your heart they do impact the body and they do impact water molecules. I've looked at all the studies on Japanese water tests where they played good music and then demonic music over water and saw that the water was actually changing its molecular shape based on the type of music that it was getting hit by.. So this is very clear that what we listen to does impact our health does impact us as individuals and to see you market and ignore this information you really are quite an idiot.
I do not know why 432Hz tuning works out so much better for my voice than 440Hz tuning. The resonance of most of the notes in the 12-TET scale sits at what seems like relaxed vocal speech resonance, wheras when I tune to 440Hz it has an unnatural high resonance where the notes in the scale sit high above the relaxed resonance of speech. I then watched a video of a famous baritone opera singer demonstrating 440Hz tuning vs 432Hz on Verdis operatic pieces. And the passaggios (vocal bridges between chest/middle/head resonance) was placed exactly at the right location. It is the same with my voice. E4 is such a annoying note in 440Hz tuning but with A4 at 432Hz it sits much more natural in the throat,, Much easier to balance the airpressure and chordal closure for the note. My voice sounds like "Me" for lack of better terms when I sing in 432Hz compared to 440Hz. THe former European standard pitch was placed at A4 at 435Hz.. A really nice comprimise as it lifts my chest register slightly making it easier to articulate in a loud music mix but not high enough that it throughs of the balance at the passaggios. The Vienna and Paris opera were tuning at A4=434Hz in 1835 before a massive pitch inflation came about,, The inflation in pitch ended in 1859 in France when a comitee of 6 composers and 2 physicians gathered a large number of tuning forks from Around Europe and decided on A4=435Hz to be the best comprimise, as it proved to be the best pitch for different operas from different periods and regions. So a return to 435Hz would be great as modern orchesteral pitch at 442Hz makes it difficult to cast the proper voices for Verdi, donezetti and Puccini.
@@MrAnders1976 in the Cold War sound weapons were used. Specifically for testing purposes you can actually look up sound weapons that were used on our soldiers and the sound weapons killed our soldiers not at first it was over time. Higher vibrations of sound the human mind is designed to comprehend sound in certain frequencies. Once you go above the normal frequency the human mind can't handle it and it starts to impact the human mind it's like all of those tests that the Japanese have done on polluted water and non polluted Water by playing music over the water the polluted water will become. Non polluted indeed non polluted water will become polluted depending on the type of music. And when they turn the frequency up they can literally see what it's doing 2 water on the microscopic level as well as. When you play music at higher frequencies over small rocks you literally can watch as they start to move based on the sound vibrations this shows that music has an impact on the physical world.
When i first learned to play guitar, i spent alot of time at the city park, hangin' out with my Yamaha acoustic guitar, a couple doobies, and a pick. Nobody had a tuner, so we went with the player who's guitar sounded the best. I guess you could say that we were tuned to 420.
SPIRITUAL so in the building
CJ 600CJ lmaoo
Sun gazing so in the build
Dats why I came here😂
I just left from his video 😂
Woke so in da buildin man
Spiritual So brought me to this video 💯
J O J O same
Same
More like Manic So but u right
Thats tuff
Me too
So luminati sent me
Wow, three experts featured in one video? Quality has really come a long way.
ZeroFunctional I felt I needed some other opinions. Haha! Only Dylan knew what I was talking about. He really is an expert because he can hear the difference.
Rick Beato Examples would have been good to hear the difference.
Sounding off with the Beato trio?
Very funny :D
Can he recognize chords in 432hz?
Who came from solluminati
He been sun gazing too much he’s starting to know too much about the world
On god
Me
Me
Mantrey Gaming Ctfu me
Just saw this - some 6 years later. Brilliant! What the people talking about a few cents either way don't seem to grasp is that music is not a single note, it is the resonance of harmonics. Shape of the room, even the moisture in the air can subtlety alter this. Let's tune the room, not the minutia! Go Rick!
This is the best video I’ve ever seen on A 432 versus A 440 comparison! I especially like the way that the experts weighed in right at the end. Brilliant Rick!
Ha.
Mr. Quail, are you out there? I'm a music theorist, and I've tried twice to relay a statement to you but each time, my very words were simplly, and somehow made to be gone. I"m trying make by wording more ambiguous in hopes of by-passing the you-know-what.
Sure. That's because you're only 7. I can see that.
SPIRITUAL so in the BUILDING
Glad to know you take advice from a guy who stares at the sun
@@the-engneer kinda interesting that the guy who stares at the sun is right tho 🤔
@@touchgrassbro9889 right about what exactly?
@@the-engneer staring at the sun gives positive energy. It comes from the universe. It is similar to meditation
I absolutely love everything about how my guitar sounds and FEELS/RESPONDS; even through the amp, when tuned to my preferred Ab/Drop Db = 432Hz. However, considering nearly every piece of recorded music that i grew up listening to; and still do, was recorded using A = 440Hz(or some variation of it), so learning/jamming along with pre-recorded music or friends, is impractical. But my love of 432Hz has nothing to do with any mystical, cosmic, or devine theories. I can only say that when my guitar is tuned to Ab/Db = 432Hz, it just sounds, feels, and responds in a much more "relaxed" way. Not so tense/intense. If that makes any sense.
Ab means that E string is Eb? I think this is 415hz
I like half step flat alot on my classical because it's mellowed out and more rich sounding. I am also going to try A 432 and half step flat from there. I wonder if the strings will sound floppy. . .
@@micahmeneyerji you are just speculating on his behalf. singers strain voices singing lower notes in 440, than higher notes in 432.
432 is much more mathematically clean. 3 x 12 x 12 = 432. Generally, when I'm modding games, I like multiples of 12, because 12 is in common with both base 3 and base 2 and has crossovers with base 8. Idk, I just like base 12. It's a really nice number. In music, it probably doesn't matter. Most people don't even appreciate the instrumentation of a song, let alone are able to hear a 1.8% difference in pitch.
@@manictigerinteresting! Western music is divided into 12 notes.
So is time, clocks and calendars.
And we used to use the imperial measurement system 12inch = 1ft etc
I've listened to comparisons of the two (432 and 440), and for some reason the 432 does sound more calm and relaxing to me. I think it might just be because it's a slightly lower tone, thus sounds more mellow when set beside a 440 sample. Throughout school, I was a trumpet player, and we always tuned *A* to 440. We had a tuning machine that you would stand in front of and play an A, and it had little dials on it that would "freeze" when the note was just right - very much like the record player strobe light tuner on a turntable. In fact, it was the same color. But when put side by side, I do like the 432 better - again, I think, because it's just a slightly lower tone giving it a more "bass" sound.
I think it's because it's a natural set of frequencies when you can equally divide 12 from 432 (36). But when you do 440/12, it's an uneven calculation. I'd love to get my hands on an old flute that is actually tuned to 432. Some European orchestras actually do have recordings of Haydn & other classical symphonies on period instruments in 432 or 435 tuning.
@@rlopezflute I know there were so many thousand musicians who were trying to oppose a 440. I seem to remember middle C being tune to a 432 through the 80s. Then, it seem to me that C was changing into C sharp. Little by little by little, Noticed a 440 becoming more and more prevalent.
@@missyhilary8905 @Missy and Hilary Sisters it's weird, some orchestras here in the US even tune to 441. My piccolo & alto flutes are tuned to 442 because they were made in Germany & Japan, which tune their instruments higher. I have to pull the headjoints out more in ensemble, but not as much when I'm playing alone. I kind of prefer 442 to 440 because the airs comes out a little easier.
U are right! I feel the same 👍🏻
It's exactly that, sounds warmer because it is lower. If you'll compare A 432 with for example A 420 - then A 420 will be warmer... And we can go on like this. No magic here :)
Spiritual So in the buildin
His Cookie661 HEEEEEE
His Cookie661 just saw video on his 2nd
Dats why I’m here😂
Oh yuh
Yupp
Hoodie so in the building man
Spiritual so in the building
Glad to know you take advice from a guy who stares at the sun
Who else here from so’s video
If you here cause of so like this lol
For sure.
Fr
Rick, I love your videos and I was wondering if you could make a video explaining George Russell's lydian chromatic concept and its application in jazz composition. Thank you.
+16664
I like A432 Hz because its not standard ( its part of my Oppositional defiant disorder....) ;-)
whatever is pleasing to the ear..what did Eddie Van Halen tune to? i heard he wasnt that particular,,as long as the guitar was in tune with itself
A made up diagnosis does not equal a personality, young man.
@@murkartik My contrarian personality disagrees with you 😀
@@davidberndt6275 Well as long as it's your personality not a made-up psychiatry term for "problems with authority".
I don't know about y'all, but I tune everything to 420hz :)
B L A Z E I T
L
A
Z
E
I
T
417 is better bro
What does that do for you?
@@missyhilary8905 gets you high 😎
Tune to A 432 harmonicas
LMAO
When I play Slayer I tune my piano to 666
the diabolical tuning of another dimension!
When I have sex I tune my "D" to 69
that is not a good idea unless you are using a toy piano. you should play slayer on two pianos, one for each hand and each foot and tune them to A 333 hz
Haha
Who plays Slayer on a piano?
I like to approximate 432 on acoustic guitar for a few reasons, mainly string tension on "long scale"(25.5") instruments. Tuning down a full half-step seems just a bit too flat, 432 just seems warmer to my ears...
It's okay to be tone deaf
@@ThePhreakass Maybe what you call tone deaf is actually the better music but we've listened to 440 for so long we think it's vice versa. Just a thought, no use in acting like we have all the answers because the world would be perfect if we did. If you don't like 432 hz that's fine but there's no use in being evangelical about something we only know on the surface level.
I agree with Lennon. I moved to 432 Hz just because it seems a little richer in tone and seems to make slight intonation problems less noticeable. It's no big deal to me because all my gigs are solo. I keep a Strat tuned to 440 Hz, just in case you want to jam.
who else here from spiritual So
Sexagesimal second have 6.000 years. To discuss the seconds and the measurement of time and space based on the rounded seconds for the Hertz, before, we need to understand the sexagesimais origins of the second. Each turn of the clock has 43,200 slices, or seconds. And the number 60 is not a random choice. 60 is the smallest number with the largest number of connections: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 12, 15, 20, 30 and 60. We don't invent mathematics, we just discover the relationships between the quantities, and give them names. That's why I reaffirm that to understand the relationship between the number 432 and the sexagesimal mandala of 60, we need to understand its origins in mathematics, geometry and cosmology.
Good Morning. You are out of context, my friend... The 12 hour time has nothing to do with the sexagesimal degree nor hertz. The sexagesimal degree is one sixth of a semitone, but one semitone is different from another in hertz. You are confused, the dashboard of an analog clock is based on the Margarita Chart, and the Absolute Harmonic Circle is also based on the Margarita Chart... But hertz has nothing to do with cartography...!!! The XOANS Theorem offers more than a hundred axioms that support it. And one of them is: - "The INDIGO vibrates in A440" . Demonstrative argument: The spectrum or decomposition of the SUNLIGHT has seven colors, and each one responds with an absolute vibratory affinity. The Pacific Blue is an energy whose photons vibrate and move in an AS and a SOUND. And that SOUND is immutable and eternal, always in 440 Hz. Pythagoras did not know about Hertz, but he did effectively handle the TONE very well in the context of Greek music. Therefore, A is an immutable Natural Tonality, since it is the vibratory affinity of the AS of PACIFIC BLUE photons in the Solar Spectrum
I love this. Great video, Rick!
Here you are Aimee!
Dear sir, this standardization issue is a bit of a "red herring" in that it supposes that the frequency that A is mapped to is really important, but as you point out for centuries (perhaps millennia) to exactly map a master tuning frequency to 440 Hz would have been impossible without modern science. So how did they tune at all? For guitarists this an important point and leads us to the 6th, and the difference between natural tuning and equal temperament and Das wohltemperierte Klavier (The well-tempered Clavier) by Bach and the differences in the fractions that make up Natural tuning (for instance tuning a guitar or piano to an open chord such as G Major or E Major versus Standard tuning. When tuned to the single Major Chord, as one goes around the Circle of Fifths, the 6ths begin to detune due to the fractions used in relation to the key center. Meanwhile in Standard or Equal Temperament, the division between half-steps is constant, and thus as one goes around the Circle of Fifths (no matter what key one is in), the "out-of-tuneness" is spread across all semitones as opposed to being solely centered on the 6th. If I am not mistaken, this also is the source of differences in notation on enharmonic notes, and the use of sharps when ascending and flats when descending for historical purposes. And finally, it took the three strings of a harpsichord or piano to really center in on equal temperament. Electronically, due to the fact that sine waves produced by electricity do not have inherent overtone artifacts unless they are deliberately designed in, we can have any mapping we desire, but it won't sound "as real" until the proper odd and even harmonics are added. Just my two cents. Great video
Dude, that's like at least 3 cents.
A very succinct reply.
This would explain as to why my open chord tuned guitars sound better tuned to A332 vs Standard tuned; then I just stick to the 'norm'.
couldn't help but laugh about resampling all of your audio collection!
SoLLUMINATI is blowing up this comment section like crazy!
STAY WOKE!
Chris House STFU.
That guy is a narcissistic imbecile who sits on his lawn drawing in coloring books with crayons, and stares at the sun
20Means Speaks NoFap! 🔥🔥
432 is so much easier and natural for me to sing to , also 432 is very calming , I put it on before bed and during work commute traffic and within minutes I am calm relaxed and happy
Did you believe that before you actually sampled it or only after hearing it?
Spiritual so sent me here
Spiritual so in the building 🧘🏾♂️
That guy is a narcissistic imbecile who sits on his lawn drawing in coloring books with crayons, and stares at the sun
RIP X🕊
Who came after So?
By the way how does Dylan react to microtonal music? And also it would be interesting to hear your opinion on microtonal music composers, thanks!
killavenger he has said that he hears a kind of mixture of two tones, meaning A and A# simultaneously when hearing a sharper A, each note getting more noticeable the closer to the actual pitch they hold they are.
Love the names of your kids, you are all in and we are all better for it.
I tune everything to 1 then makes the strings 432 times shorter.
cuz oneness is the ultimate truth
I'm 4 years later, but i love this comment, lmao.
You won't convince all the new age nuts with facts, man!
Tell me about it, but for some reason, I can't stop being triggered by the fruitcakes.
Pythagoras has NOTHING to do with New Age, idiots!
@ please go listen to some Pythagorean tuned music, and I don't mean the ambient music, I mean music with somewhat complex harmony, it sounds like utter crap, no music where the ratio of the major third is 81/64 will sound good
@ Pythagoras has nothing to do with 432hz
haha I love the way you couldn't keep a straight face when mentioning chrystal healing energies and the frequencies of the universe woo woo :D :D :D
The smirk he seemed to be trying to contain was delightful.
432 is much better for meditation music and songwriting, I used to be sceptical but I have done a LOT of comparison and I don't think it's just a placebo and there could have been a conspiracy. I think Rick is being a bit glib with his dismissal here.
agree
Did you compare other frequencies besides 432. Or did you just test 440 vs 432?
Even if water reacts differently to 432 hz, tuning music down to that frequency will only effect water (or anything else) when that particular octave of A is played. Music changes chords, pitch, and tones constantly. Unless the entire song is just one long A note, it's not really going to realign your chakra or whatever.
We are 60% water
@@spacercake What about many types of protein in our body? What about DNA and RNA?
Good point. Not many songs out there that only use A . If a person wanted to try vibration or resonance therapy, maybe a difference, who knows?
@@spacercake I thought I was bugging🤣 the whole point is if it can do that to water it can do worse to us
In reference to your last words... you don't know that
Quick and straight to the point. Thanks!
I had never heard of 432 vs 440 until somebody I hardly knew randomly sent me a video addressing it a year ago. It was an interesting video. A little bit new agey but interesting enough that I decided to try it. Lo and behold when I started singing it did seem like some ethereal static that I had subconsciously always fought against had been removed!
Last month I did my first gig in a while and definitely asked the band to all tune at 432 Hz.
Of course my mind was occupied with all the details of doing a show so I really forgot completely all about the fact that we had tuned down at 432. No question for the whole night I was kind of marveling over the way my vocals sat so comfortably on top of the mix!? That doesn’t happen a lot. Also the instruments were never fighting against each other. Each instrument seemed to have comfortable space. And we were not too loud. We were not un-loud But we were not too loud. I could see people still able to converse with each other even though we were playing at a decent volume. It was a few days before it occurred to me that it might’ve had something to do with us performing at 432HZ. I know there’s lots of snarkiness and mockers and scoffers around this idea. Lol… And may be 440 is/was more appropriate for our beloved rock ‘n’ roll era that was aggressive and harsh from the get-go. But as for me I love playing and singing at 432. My two cents! Great RUclips channel Rick thank you!
Interesting post. I find that 440Hz- 442Hz makes the notes in the 12-TET scale sit rather high in resonance in the throat.. Move pitch down to 432Hz and most notes just seem to hover at my voices relaxed state.. And singing high in my upper middle register C4 to E4 becomes much more comftable.. In fact the passaggio E4 might be the most tricky note for my voice.. Move pitch down to 431Hz that E4 becomes so much easier to find the balance..
It sounds like your voice benefits from a lower tuning. But my guess is that it's not necessarily A=432. The same relaxation would probably come from tuning to A=434 or A=431. If it works for you though, go with it.
@@esterhammerfic
I tried with many tunings.. I tried A4=430Hz and I find it a little too low when I hit my lower chest register.. The sweet-spot for my voice is around 434Hz..
Hahaha... went down this rabbit hole tonight. Nice treatment.
Spiritual so inna building
I have a theory on these 2 tuning systems. I think if our tuning system had been in 432, the world would be a better place... it's a fascinating "what-if" thought that i often have, although it's impossible. It's still fun to hear comparisons. There's something different about 432 tuning that draws you in. And this is coming from someone who has perfect pitch in 440. It's taken a while to get used to 432.
One day has 86400 seconds... 432/864...
That´s in line / sync with everything - the whole cosmos.
That is why sensitive people feel that. But in our dumbed down society it´s all just nuts...
Mankind is ignorant like...
@@vectragt2310oh wow, I didn't know about the seconds of rhe day. I do know that 432/12 = 36, but what is interesting is 440/12 =36.666 🧐 No wonder so many musicians have anxiety &/or are depressed! And that includes myself. If we're constantly exposed to unequal frequencies, it's doing something to us physically & emotionally. I wish more research was done on this.
@@rlopezflute
432/8 = physical
432/9 = spiritual / Ether side
And yes, 440 was put in place on purpose...
Also, no further investigation needs to be done if people learn to follow their intuiton and heart/earth.
@@vectragt2310 One day has 85.984,091 seconds, we just rounded it down to 24 hours. Also, a day is not the same in the whole cosmos, only our Earth day is roughly 24 hours. Stop trying to be smart as if 432Hz is in tune with the universe or something, it isn't even in tune by your own standards.
@@RoderickVoordouw
Well, then I made an incorrect statement.
In line with earth and its frequency, as we ARE ON EARTH. And with 440 you are out of sync and it is not coincidence this became western standard.
There won´t be a direct effect from listening to 432, but over time when it would be all over the radio, etc. DNA and concioussness would change. As you surely know DNA is dynamic.
So stop trying to tell bs...
I like the Oldsmobile 442.
I think all of this goes out the window once you start dealing with vocals. A persons vocal range is determined by the shape of their body. When I decide to do a cover song I do it in what ever key works for my voice. So it really doesn't matter what my guitar is tuned to.
I tried out the 432hz tuning on my guitar, and well at first I noticed a difference, once my ear became use to it, it started sounding normal. then tuning back with 440hz it sounded out, but soon after it sounded normal. it was a little like playing a song using flats, it sounds weird at first, but also somewhat more mellow and relaxing, but depending on the notes, it can also sound silent hill creepyish.
Thats because it doesn't matter what frequency you start A as. In 12 tone equal temperament tuning, its all whole ratios anyways.
We have A=440 today because of a centuries long loudness war. The higher A (with the same music piece) the louder/brighter it sounds, the lower the A the warmer, softer it sounds. Louder == Better. A has been anywhere between 380hz and 500hz depending on the era, composer, instrument, people, etc. We have old tuning forks for pretty much everything in between too. 440 was just chosen because its good enough, 'loud' but still manageable by traditional string instruments without breaking stuff.
The war continued when compression was invented. . .
FINALLY SOME INTELLIGENT TRUTH ABOUT THIS ARGUMENT!
luminati gang spiritual So in the building Sungazing So in the building
Gang💯
Ayeeee
Hahaha the kids put everything in order.
I'm glad i didn't miss this one.
thank You Rick.
Zsolt
I’ve found it a bit easier to sing when tuned 432.
432 is the best!! Stephen Dawson does Katie Perry’s teenage dream in 432 and it takes it to the next level
I heard years ago that 440a was made so we would be forced into a more discordant type vibration overall concerning the music. Just something I'd heard in past, kind of like fluoride and other things people claim were introduced to not help us. I'm sure others have heard the same thing. Rick I dig your videos, all of them! 🎸
We have the Rockefellers to thank for enforcing 440 Hz as standard. They also gave us the brutal American public school system and helped fund the rise of the Third Reich. Go figure.
Hitler did this in his country
i was never convinced the 432 Hz was some miracle frequency so i thoroughly enjoyed this video - having said that, i still think the issue of energetic frequency in music is a profound subject - i would argue that the only so-called 'frequency' that truly matters would have to do with the unique character of the music itself
Very good thank you !! I learned a bit about this subject playing with a french accordianist that had an old accordian instrument tuned in this way, A =435; You surely put more light on the subject with a few things i didn't know. Thank you Rick for the cool vids!!
Spiry🙏🏾 So in the buildin
Thanks for the informative video Rick
Notes A3=216Hz (-31.77 cents) and G#3=204Hz (-30.7 cents),, just lay completely natural to my voice.. The ~ 30 cents lift from ~432Hz to 440Hz for A4 is not natural for my voice... MY voice relaxed resonance is around the tuning of A4 at 432Hz.. Singing high notes comes very natural when the guitar is tunes at 432Hz vs 440Hz.. The passaggio is shifted too high at 440Hz
Infact the highest pitch for my voice if I lay of a lot of weight (early transition) is ~438Hz (~8 cents). A4=440Hz is very difficult to find the balance in the throat.. In my world 440Hz excludes a lot of voices in music.. The previous european pitch at 435Hz is a better comprimise between a high (445Hz) and low pitch (425Hz).
A4=424-425Hz would be close to Mozats and Händels pitch as they used a forks at A4=421.6 and 422.5Hz but they were probably using a more "pure" tuning system like meantone or just intonation which was much more common which sets the A (major six. or La) note flatter relative to 12-TET in the C major scale. I think it was a piano tuning company from late 1800s that had their pianos tuned in Meantone at 433.5Hz for A4 and with 12-TET is was A4=436Hz. A difference of ~10 cents.
A tenor hitting the high notes to Händels halleluja to a piano tuned to 425Hz would be easy, nice and full.. At modern A4=442-443Hz which many like to tune their classical instruments at .. The tenor sounds bad... It is only the spinto tenors (very few individuals) that would sing the high part with ease...
We got it all wrong,, The previous pitch at 435Hz is as high the note of A4 should have gone to get the right classical division of fachs..
This is a fact...440Hz is a very "unnatural" singing pitch if I may use that word.
dansk björn 440 is unnatural to your body, and it is to mine as well - but my body is more comfortable around 450. The tiny bit of extra sharpness really helps me maintain consitant intonation. Conversely, I have an old bass trumpet that doesn't tune any higher than 430 - and I prefer to play it around 425. Every body and every instrument is different, and you gotta do what works best for you and for your equipment!
424-425/449-450hz as a nice spot i completely can relate to. it is another nice area together with the 432/457hz area. what is your vocal fach when singing..
the weirdest pitch area for my voice is 439-445hz. not low enough and not high enough
The 19th-Century composer Giuseppe Verdi reportedly liked 432-Hz tuning because his opera singers’ voices lasted a lot longer. Nothing mystical about that. 1/3 of 1/2 of a step lower than 440 Hz seems barely noticeable to the average ear, but I guess that somebody who pushes their vocal ability to its limits for a good length of time would consider it a gift. 👂🏼🎹
i'd like to hear A432 compared to other alternative tunings, like A420 or something like that.
My doubt is: is the relaxing effect due to just lowering frequency, or do 432 resonates better than higher and lower tunings?
A day has 86400 seconds...
The blind are leading the blind into darkness...
@@vectragt2310 things are looking up but falling down
I like your videos (even though they often go over my head and make me cry like an infant at my own ineptitude, leaving me wanting to: 432 part quit to 440 part get on my instrument).
This was so informative and cheeky at the same time. It made a potentially dry subject fun to watch. This has been my favorite so far!
Explanation is very simple. They are just making money. On almost every website discussing how 432 Hz is better you will find CDs for sale (at least this is how it was 10 years ago when all that nonsense started).
That's the explanation for new age bullshit in general btw.
It's pretty much the same with other conspiracy based websites : they often have books or/and DVDs to sell !
It's all about making bucks
what conspiracy theories are you talking about? no one is talking about conspiracy theories here yet you, a bunch of lazy wankers, are doing just that! You are the ones who are crazy not those who discover the truth about the world we live in :) Let me repeat this :) YOU ARE THE ONES WHO ARE CRAZY :) Deal with that :)
I have to say, this is my favorite video on the whole 432 vs 440 debate. Thank you!
How can we disagree with an authority of Dylan's calibre!
440hz throws off our vibration and disconnects us from source. Hence why they made it the standard in 1932. Just another example of how everything in life today is backwards from how it was meant to be.
I think I have a negative effect to 440. Life somebody"ruffling my feathers".You made much more clear as to get people to understand these concepts. Physics was one of my favorite subjects in highschool but still how does this translate to practice, real life,how can I choose to tune my guitar to 432Hz?
Western music in equal temperament uses 12 different frequencies, only one of which is a multiple of the frequency of A : the A itself.
A piece in Eb major tuned at 432Hz will contain no A at all, so no instance of a note vibrating at that 432Hz frequency.
This should be enough to debunk the 432 Hz bullshit.
I like singing in A432 for the same reason I like tuning to Eb. It's easier to hit high notes. But it's a hassle tuning back and forth when I play with other people, recordings or RUclips so I just play in A440 99.9% of the time.
Cycles per second weren't specifically measured until the year 1834 when the Savart Wheel and the Tonometer where invented, but because the metric system came out in 1795, music was accurate; even more so, relatively, than most people today with tuners. They knew, then, the note range for any given length of tube for a horn or a pipe organ to get different notes for transposition. The earliest development known for the metric system is from John Wilkins.
In 1668, he proposed a coordinated system of units of measure for length, area, volume, and mass. This means that people knew what they were tuning and building their instruments to for more than half of the Baroque Era and all of the Classical Era. Things are generally accepted before they become standardized, but even if instrument makers didn't know the Hertz value, the metric system is defined as being derived from nature.
So, like I've explained, instrument makers, then, knew the acoustical output of instruments based on the shapes and sizes of natural objects through simple observation. They might not have had tuners, but Europeans knew how to trace and compare lengths precisely since before they came out of caves. Perception is rooted in nature and the observation of it consciously.
This is why your son sang a 33 and a third cent wide quarter tone. Let me explain; he had to hear when one note range started and the other one ended. 448 Hz tuning actually sounds 1/3 of a note flat, 440 Hz sounds 1/3 of a note sharp, and 432 Hz, being 40 octaves lower than the calibration of primary and secondary visual colors within a 12 tone system, sound balanced.
Stay with me, now. He sang the note up past 448 Hz tuning and touched 456 Hz tuning (the next note up from 432 Hz) and in doing so, he then brought it down to where the note would sound so flat that it couldn't be confused with being the same note compare to the commercial standard of tuning. Take a look at this repeating pattern rooted in the conscious awareness of the complete range of any "A" (Orange) that is 40 octaves lower than the THz range of the visible colors Red through Yellow:
•flat = 400 Hz = Ab = Raspberry-Red
+8 Hz
•in-tune = 408 Hz = Ab = Red
+8 Hz
•sharp = 416 Hz =Ab = Orange-Red
+ 8 Hz
•flat = 424 Hz = A = Red-Orange
+8 Hz
•in-tune = 432 Hz = A = Orange
+8 Hz
•sharp = 440 Hz = A = Yellow-Orange
+8 Hz
•flat = 448 Hz = A# = Orange-Yellow
+8 Hz
•in-tune = 456 Hz = A# = Yellow
+8 Hz
•sharp = 464 Hz = A# = Lime-Yellow
We are dealing with microtones, here, but compared to the World War tuning, in-tune is flat; flat is sharp (as the next note down); and, (as sharp as any note can be before it is in the next range of color) is in-tune.
Understanding this will have you realize that 440 Hz came about to make music sound sharp. It is better to sound sharp than out of tune, but that is just 440 Hz, not 442 Hz or 445 Hz.
I hope that this explains some of the weird theories that claim that 432 Hz can expand your awareness. It sure could help you to understand and develop perfect pitch. Thank you for taking the time to read all of this.
Who came from solluminati 🤦🏾♂️🤣
Love the nerdy factor of this topic...and two thumbs up for the experts opinions 👍
This discussion pops up a lot!The long list of pseudocience/spirituality stuff you reeled off makes me laugh for sure haha. It's clear there can't be a superior system in regards to anything like that, because resonances of physical bodies will never be consistent. Also, any significance of the number 432 is entirely arbitrary like you explained. Besides, that's just one single frequency of one single note whilst music contains the full spectrum!When people push such reasons in support of 432, they tend to show a fundamental misunderstanding of how sound works - throwing around words like resonance, harmonics, overtones, without realising that all these things remain consistent, just slightly lower. Their points could be used to argue for tuning systems like Just Intonation vs 12EDO, but 12EDO vs 12EDO slightly lower is really irrelevant. Tune to whatever :) As a rule of thumb lower will sound a bit calmer for sure. I liked Jacob Colliers modulation from 440 to 432 as it displays that effect very well.
A=435hz will always be my favourite. It all comes alive
Loved the George Carlin-style ranty list at 1:44!
Emperor Spock That was great!
i love how orchestras were so concentrated on one hertz of difference when u almost definitely cant notice it
Before i discovered that there was a literal debate over this i first noticed when listening to some heavy metal/rock records that they sounded off when i tried to jam along to them and figured it must be like a 'quarter step down' using my ear and ended up with 430hz and have had my floyd rose set up in this particular tuning for a few years now. it sucks having to detune every single (almost) song i wanna jam to haha but you will find that lots of mechanical/electronic/harmonic tones you will hear in your day to day life will resonate with this tuning! i think that must be where the whole 'freq of the universe' stuff came from...
the earth's frequency is supposedly 8 hz, and 432 is divisible by 8 54 times. 5+4 = 9, and 9 +11 = NINE ELEVEN
We are all here cause of So. Stay woke!
WHOS HERE BECAUSE OF SOLLUMINATI STAY WOKE???
:) lol, I get to the same point with very few words, but this has to be one of the best responses to this debate/dilemma, whatever it is to whomever, that I have ever heard. Winning!!!
The difference of 440Hz to 432Hz is 1.8 percent. If you play a cheap acoustiv guitar for some time, you will start at 440Hz and end at 432Hz. The BIG benefit of the cheap guitar: you get all cosmic tunes between 440Hz and 432Hz. Doing this, you may find the secret frequency of the universe!
since music frequencies are logarithmic you cannot compare them in prtcentage which is linear, for A4 at 432 vs 440 it is approximately 1/3 of a half tone, that 1/3 of a half tone increases in percentage as go move to higher frequencies 😊
I like to play Mozart and Beethoven (and Bach, I guess) at a semitone lower than today's concert pitch, and Chopin a semitone higher. BUT there's more to it than that: it's of more importance to use a non-equal tuning, so the different chords have different sounds from each other. I love the way even my Yamaha digital piano comes to life by using Werckmeister - with the C chords sounding so different from the Bs, the Gs sounding so different from the Aflats etc
A semitone up or down either way doesn't really make that much difference to many people.
Hey Rick - do you believe in such a thing as 'perfect tempo'? If so, is it acquired in the same manner as perfect pitch?
Would "perfect tempo" be like being able to tap, say, 44.73 beats per minute accurately?
I don't think this exists, but if it did, I would assume it would be parallel to perfect pitch, and would have a contrasting relative tempo. People without perfect pitch come close by using relative pitch, so they keep in mind a particular note and figure out the interval between the given pitch and the note - relative tempo would be achieved by say, listening to your watch ticks and knowing what 60 BPM sounds like, then you tap a rhythm at 60 BPM that gives you some other rhythm (if you tap dotted quarter notes at 60 BPM, you get 45 BPM - if you tap half notes at 60 BPM, you get 30 BPM - you can work out most tempos by doing a process like this). It's a starting point, but I would imagine it's not possible to be _that_ accurate at memorizing tempo.
Paul Sampson for mammals, that's roughly 1.5 million heartbeats
Yep, bizarrely enough, our organs have finite operating limits, just like the things we manufacture.
Sobering thought.
I was waiting for you so long man thank you
Coming soon "SOUNDING OFF with Dylan, Lennon and Layla" :)
That would be interesting.
After all I've read and heard about this issue, I agree with Rick, if tuning to 432 rocks your boat, do it. But IMHO, it what people play and their sound that takes great precedence over just it's pitch, when listening. Their choice of notes, as well as the relationship to each other, no matter what the pitch one's tuned to, is a greater factor in whether I feel the music is transcendent, calming, healing, or jarring, agitated, even violent. Playing crappy music can't be overcome simply by tuning to 432. And listening to music is so very subjective anyway, takes me back to saying just do what sounds best to you...
Sollumanati brought me here
Love the video. The experts at the end say it all. Too funny!
This was quite a funny video. great explanation
So in the building
Rick Beato just took Adam Neely lessons
Caleb English I answered one of the 2 questions I get asked everyday. The other is people telling me that they can develop PP as adults. I did however make a new style thumbnail :)
Nah. Not enough D A N K M E M E S
Well I'm just loving every bit of both of these channels. I got excited and the words flew out of my keyboard. Hope it didn't come across as disrespectful. Thanks again for the awesome content!
great ... a huge thank u ... straight to the point without the usual dribble
Sun gazing So in the building.
thoroughly enjoyed your content, context & delivery, thanks heaps!
Hey Rick,
I just LOVE 432 and 448 hertz tuning.
440 pitches sound really aggressive to me in comparison (did a lot of blind testing).
Coldplay, Melody Gardot and the Vienna Philharmonic have liked it too :)
Cheers
Well done! Excellent reference video. Thanks!
I've just stumbled upon something truley interesting. People believed that 432hz was resonant with 8hz (which was considered the harmonic resonance of the earth) ... until.. we developed fine instruments to determin it was really 7.83 which would make the A frequency 430.65. I didn't care to much about all the nonsense until i actually listened to a piece of music in 430.65 and it actually created this unusual humming sensation in my body. The closest thing i can descride it as, is the feeling i would get if i smoked a hit off of a joint. Not to get too hippy-like but it really felt like love was pumping through my body. But when i went back to 440hz music, it seemed to slightly intensify a slight headache i had from earlier in the day. Weird stuff.
What kills the 432 havinmg any sort of " spiritua;l " effect on a guitar is the equal temperment . You can adjust the fundamental tuning , however it still aint right !
My family has always been a very musical family my mother was a musician in a band so I grew up in a very musical family in general. But when I started listening to music at 4:32 Hertz I noticed that all of my headaches stopped happening and that I was able to sleep more peacefully cuz I listen to a lot of music when you listen to music at a higher Hertz ratio your brain can only download sound vibrations at a certain frequency level. So if you are constantly listening to music at a higher frequency level it can overwhelm your sensory ability in your brain and can make you feel depressed and sleepy. I don't believe in any of the chakra crap that the new age people are pushing. I understand that frequencies at high levels can be used to affect the brain in very negative ways back during the Cold War we had some of our soldiers had high-frequency weapons used on them and it eventually drove them insane and killed them. So listening to something at a high frequency can have a very bad impact on your mental and physical health my dad works for the US Army and designed microwave emitters that vibrate the molecules of the person's body causing excruciating pain. When I asked him about the Hertz issue that everyone's talking about. He looked at me and said very clearly don't listen to anything outside of 432 I said why. He said because if you listen to higher frequencies they can mess with you over time. This is a guy who got the highest level on the ASVAB in the US Army than anyone in US Army history. Who literally designed a piece of equipment that can blow you up from the inside out. I myself have an IQ of 160 so I'm not stupid. After doing my research I have realized that higher frequencies do impact the brain they do impact your heart they do impact the body and they do impact water molecules. I've looked at all the studies on Japanese water tests where they played good music and then demonic music over water and saw that the water was actually changing its molecular shape based on the type of music that it was getting hit by.. So this is very clear that what we listen to does impact our health does impact us as individuals and to see you market and ignore this information you really are quite an idiot.
Well said.Maybe he benefits from spreading this misinformation bro!
The way he tried to deter people by mentioning prices of boutique high end gear was kinda suspect also!
I do not know why 432Hz tuning works out so much better for my voice than 440Hz tuning. The resonance of most of the notes in the 12-TET scale sits at what seems like relaxed vocal speech resonance, wheras when I tune to 440Hz it has an unnatural high resonance where the notes in the scale sit high above the relaxed resonance of speech.
I then watched a video of a famous baritone opera singer demonstrating 440Hz tuning vs 432Hz on Verdis operatic pieces. And the passaggios (vocal bridges between chest/middle/head resonance) was placed exactly at the right location. It is the same with my voice. E4 is such a annoying note in 440Hz tuning but with A4 at 432Hz it sits much more natural in the throat,, Much easier to balance the airpressure and chordal closure for the note. My voice sounds like "Me" for lack of better terms when I sing in 432Hz compared to 440Hz. THe former European standard pitch was placed at A4 at 435Hz.. A really nice comprimise as it lifts my chest register slightly making it easier to articulate in a loud music mix but not high enough that it throughs of the balance at the passaggios.
The Vienna and Paris opera were tuning at A4=434Hz in 1835 before a massive pitch inflation came about,, The inflation in pitch ended in 1859 in France when a comitee of 6 composers and 2 physicians gathered a large number of tuning forks from Around Europe and decided on A4=435Hz to be the best comprimise, as it proved to be the best pitch for different operas from different periods and regions. So a return to 435Hz would be great as modern orchesteral pitch at 442Hz makes it difficult to cast the proper voices for Verdi, donezetti and Puccini.
@@MrAnders1976 in the Cold War sound weapons were used. Specifically for testing purposes you can actually look up sound weapons that were used on our soldiers and the sound weapons killed our soldiers not at first it was over time. Higher vibrations of sound the human mind is designed to comprehend sound in certain frequencies. Once you go above the normal frequency the human mind can't handle it and it starts to impact the human mind it's like all of those tests that the Japanese have done on polluted water and non polluted Water by playing music over the water the polluted water will become. Non polluted indeed non polluted water will become polluted depending on the type of music. And when they turn the frequency up they can literally see what it's doing 2 water on the microscopic level as well as. When you play music at higher frequencies over small rocks you literally can watch as they start to move based on the sound vibrations this shows that music has an impact on the physical world.
It’s all about the harmonies and ratios of one pitch compared to another. 😁👍
When i first learned to play guitar, i spent alot of time at the city park, hangin' out with my Yamaha acoustic guitar, a couple doobies, and a pick. Nobody had a tuner, so we went with the player who's guitar sounded the best. I guess you could say that we were tuned to 420.
Thanks for the laugh! I’m sure a 420 was actually fun!
Would those with perfect pitch still have perfect recall for tracks in 432 Hz? Ask Dylan