This is misleading. The out painting tool did not have access to the original photo, it had access only to the square cropped version, correct? There's nothing controversial or a fail about what it has done. Am I wrong?
All these tools in reality blind, and any Ai always bring it's fantasy no matter what you feed there, it's the core of "Imagenet" invention, which technically always trying to guess blindly what you've bringing there (classical example with cat and etc). That's why Ai tools still not used in real restoration works, the technology kinda promising, but not serious. This is only about image generation, voice cloning is very different topic based on large language models.
The point is - it is representing the person in a way that may not be desirable for that person - because AI is making up the output. It is on those using AI for such things to ensure the output image is aligned with the person they are representing.
That would be cursed lol. It does a good job less than half the time. Now imagine it trying to depict sexual acts... It would be horrifying to see what exactly it messes up.
This is not a failure of AI, this is a failure of the conference for deciding to photoshop someone's picture. As for why the AI decided to widen the opening slightly, that's because it was just continuing the lines it could see. In the original the shirt is rumpled up a bit, closing the gap slightly, in the edited one it's smoothed out, widening it slightly. All three buttons are unbuttoned in both pictures, the fabric just falls differently. That it added a bra instead of just having bare clevage is just more tasteful than the alternative. This video is a nothing burger.
This is misleading. The out painting tool did not have access to the original photo, it had access only to the square cropped version, correct? There's nothing controversial or a fail about what it has done. Am I wrong?
that's what I was thinking just before I saw this comment
Exactly, nothing wrong here, and relating to social engineering is unfounded it existed even before AI was mainstream
All these tools in reality blind, and any Ai always bring it's fantasy no matter what you feed there, it's the core of "Imagenet" invention, which technically always trying to guess blindly what you've bringing there (classical example with cat and etc). That's why Ai tools still not used in real restoration works, the technology kinda promising, but not serious. This is only about image generation, voice cloning is very different topic based on large language models.
The point is - it is representing the person in a way that may not be desirable for that person - because AI is making up the output. It is on those using AI for such things to ensure the output image is aligned with the person they are representing.
@@dustinsuburbia Yup, 100% on the people who decided to photoshop her picture, not on the tool they used to do it.
Bros after ad revenue
What if AI is trained on adult movies.
That would be cursed lol. It does a good job less than half the time. Now imagine it trying to depict sexual acts... It would be horrifying to see what exactly it messes up.
@@CPB4444 lol i would not even attempt to watch it, it might traumatize me
AI just tries to learn and reveal the probability distribution of truth about human society.
Wait wait wait you uploaded on 3 AM night? I'm commenting on 4 AM (almost) while studying for exam!
Can u please tell me your pc specs? I want to try local models etc. what gpu would u recommend
This is not a failure of AI, this is a failure of the conference for deciding to photoshop someone's picture. As for why the AI decided to widen the opening slightly, that's because it was just continuing the lines it could see. In the original the shirt is rumpled up a bit, closing the gap slightly, in the edited one it's smoothed out, widening it slightly. All three buttons are unbuttoned in both pictures, the fabric just falls differently. That it added a bra instead of just having bare clevage is just more tasteful than the alternative.
This video is a nothing burger.
If I need to empty the input field after the submission, how should I amend the code?
we must remember, there is no spoon
Everything on earth is not real..we are not real! Lol...
Have you already seen new Bobby Broccoli documentary about "unlimited energy" scientists project?
♥️
This is why openAi is giving us orbs to solve this lol