Ugh! I swear this judge hears ONLY what she wants to!! The Defendant has told her TWICE NOW she did agree to return a partial refund of his deposit which JM HERSELF SAID JUST A MINUTE BEFORE she starts hounding the Defendant why hasn’t she returned Plaintiffs $ back!! MAKE-UP YOUR MIND JM!!
Oh my! Plaintiff tells Doug this was his FIRST time trying to buy a car by himself! Really? At his age? (Dude has to be in his 40’s or late 30’s at least? & he sounds normal??!) -what did I miss?
I don't understand why the Judge didn't press the fact, that she said she called him and said he was approved and he said she never called him to say he was approved. The Judge just keeps laughing everything off, not sure why. It was annoying.
@@barbarawallach1334 Are you related to the defendant? It would seem so LOL. What's annoying is that the defendant acted like a womachild "I got annoyed at him". Unless there was proof the plaintiff received that call it really is he/she said, unlike the texts where the defendant told the plaintiff she "tried" refunding him.
This is a normal practice for most companies and those whose run them whether guilty or innocent. Accusations stick to companies. Doesn't matter if the accusations are proven false. With very public cases like this, there is potential for keyboard warriors to harass and drive down a company's rep with spiteful negative reviews. Anonymity isn't the defendant's problem. Her behavior is.
I wouldn't deal with them as soon as they told me the car they offered me was randomly sold. Especially if it takes awhile to get verified. They knew the original car was already being sold.
That's not what happened. The car he originally saw in the magazine that he went to look at was sold prior to his arrival. He test drove and put deposit on a different vehicle
Right, I totally think that this car dealership for "credit challenged" takes full advantage of people with the bait and switch and then assumes they will buy something else at their used car dealership. I learned a valuable lesson, I will never sign anything without a document stating I will not get my money back if the deal falls through. This lady is a person that preys on low income people with credit issues, that makes me mad in itself, credit issues can happen for many reasons , not just being late on a payment. I can relate.
The bait-and-switch car was probably gone minutes after they took the pictures for the ad months before. If they ever even owned the vehicle. Would not be surprised to learn they snuck onto another lot somewhere and took a picture of a random nice SUV. The whole reason people talk about bad and shady car dealers summed in one bad and shady episode. They should say her name and the name of the "dealership" every time they addressed her!!!!!
To take an advantage of “credit challenge” folks like she says, is F’d up! You knew the verification process but they don’t!!! Don’t sell people dreams! Especially desperate people!!!! Smh
... what are you talking about exactly? She told him how long it takes to get verified and explained the process to him. He was then verified within a day and she immediately called him and told him. What "dreams" is she selling? If anyone got their hopes up here then it's because they are unreasonable and don't pay attention when people explain things. It would not be her fault since she explains the process every time and then calls the customer as soon as they are verified. You sound like a Karen. You would just yell at the employee if the process took 2 days even after they tell you it could take up to a week and then if you aren't approved you would insist it was somehow their fault. You're not being rational. If ppl want to "dream/get their hopes up" that's their own fault and she cannot stop that nor is she responsible for the feelings and actions of a grown adult.
@@MalloriaAnn What are you talking about? Write your opinion on the video like everyone else. Idgaf what you think! Writing that endless paragraph was pointless mAlLoRY
@@MalloriaAnn she did a bait and switch on him first , and then they used their sales tactics to pressure him into puting down a deposit on a vehicle with bad brakes for goodness sakes ! i agree with the verdict .
In this instance, she caused a lot of the annoyance herself by lying to him regarding returning his deposit. Had she just returned what she promised, he would’ve been out of her life. Sounds like she felt some kind of way because he changed his mind about buying the car and thought she would get her little “lick back” by giving him the runaround.
i agree with the verdict . first this lady does a bait and switch on the guy and then they try to sell him a vehicle with BAD BRAKES , and then she finally says she will return his money but she in reality never does return his money . people like her is just another reason used car dealers have such a bad reputation .
I'm glad he got his deposit back from this shady lady. If possible, always take someone who is familiar with cars or the car buying process with you when shopping for cars. It can be very overwhelming and you can easily get taken advantage of by salesmen when they see you don't know any better.
@marilynwillett804 Age has nothing to do with it. Maaany people utilize the bus, subway, walk or even bike as a mode of transportation. Some all their lives. So not everyone knows a lot about cars or the car buying experience. Have a little grace. I’m sure this is a lesson learned for this gentleman.
i agree with the verdict . first this lady does a bait and switch on the guy and then they try to sell him a vehicle with BAD BRAKES , and then she finally says she will return his money but she in reality never does return his money . people like her is just another reason used car dealers have such a bad reputation .
She wasn't in the wrong however untill she told him shed give him the deposit back and then consistently lying about it being done. Without that the plaintiff would have lost. The actual car sale was done on the up and up, it was his choice to buy that specific car.
@@MR.Drowsy158 I hear you but that should have been a red flag for him. If you’re promised a car and already have your money for a specific car and they promised that car and when you go to pick it up and they told you they sold it and offer a different car……they’d lose my business. Idk 🤷🏼♀️ good business owners don’t do certain things.
Right. That isn’t what happened. The car that got him in the dealer got sold. They didn’t sell it from under him, it was sold before he ever got in the store. He made a deposit and then got cold feet about the car which is fine but he isn’t owed the full deposit. The fact he wants “pain and suffering” shows he probably was a pain to deal with… And it was his first car by himself!? He had no idea what he was doing.
They got him there with a false advertisement, these scammers car dealerships do it all the time, once there they find a way to scam people out their money, they abuse the most vulnerable 😡
@@zaiturcotte1576 no they didn't. He went there without contacting based on a magazine ad(when the car gets sold they can't go mark it as sold in every single copy of the magazine). He chose to look and put a deposit on a different vehicle
How the hell are you going to call it a deposit if he doesn't get the item he put the money down on? Guy didn't leave the lot with the car, car was never transferred over into his name. He paid her money to hold onto her own shit.
When the plaintiff made first contact with the defendant inquiring about the SUV I guarantee you that the SUV was already gone & the defendant just strung this guy along to get him to her dealership where she would try to sell him something totally different. The defendant clearly had some physical disfigurements & I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't arise from her trying to deceive a previous buyer with her same game & got knocked out.
SHADY dealership. i was in the same situation where i went to look at a car 2hrs away and they never told me they sold it when i spoke to them before i left my home. get there and they tell me to see if i want anything on the lot. i was beyond pissed and did not trust them at that point. told them to kick rocks. these little dealerships are scams
How is what's his face going to sit there after the episode and say if not specified it's usually refundable when the Judge literally just said the opposite lol
She is a scammer and I hope everyone sees this. I don't agree that they are allowed to withhold the business name!!! She definitely needs to be exposed for the fraudulent business she owns! The plaintiff deserves everything back and more.
She should have told him her big spiel before he took an hour bus ride. I have no respect for dishonest business people. Karma is going to get her good for being such an azzhole
He’s lucky that he got his money back. You put a deposit down and change your mind too bad . If she never told him she would give him his money back he would not of gotten it.
he is still looking for a car , so the actual lesson he learned is its hard to find a car that runs good and looks good for only 4 or 5 grand anymore .
Stealerships do that all the time, advertise a specific car with very attractive numbers. Once they get you there the car you wanted was conveniently _"sold this weekend, but I have something else for you on the lot."_ Yeah and the alternate cars are always more expensive. That car was probably never there to begin and if it was a courtesy call to him would have been nice before he came there.
she said he lol thast what she said howver i think she meant she and u know im surprsied i never thought that could be why or some eye condition but ya i think theres more twitching if a stroke not sure, my step who im iffy with but ok with lately had a stroke hes recovered from 1 b4 but im not sure how bad this 1 was but it snuds like a fall may have also happened and he was in a wc in a bigopen concept house with lots of stuff and my mom has health probs notonly is it hard for me to get to them but my mom n i have had a strained reli and falling out and shes toxic n she doesnt see it so isnt doing much to really truely try n fix it , anyway but this was recent wel the mom part almost 2.5 months already but my steps stroke so i cant believi didnt think that could be the case, maybe i was just that absorbed in the case
I’ve heard Judge Millian multiple times say that non-refundable is the default if refundable isn’t written for a deposit. Harvey said the opposite at the end of this video.
This case COMPLETELY contradicts what the judge said in the last case I watched. In the last case she said if the contract doesn't say the deposit is non-refundable, its assumed to be refundable... but in this case its different?... She just be pulling "laws" out of her a** with all that fast talking. She could never be a real judge ETA for reference: that case was called "Cooking Up a Lawsuit" posted on 4/17/23
Exactly sometimes she says "you don't have to prove without doubt just that it more than likely happened" then says "there's not enough proof" when it's obviously more than likely😂 even to her standard.
Most of my customers are credit challenged. Yea lady because that’s who you’ve geared your business towards, just so she can do what you did in this case. Bait, switch and swindle.
She was so shady from the jump and thought she can take advantage because her customers are “challenged”. I would never do business with someone who speaks about their customers like that.
It's always hilarious when plaintiffs ask for "pain and suffering" for what is obviously a contracts case. Even if the plaintiff has a good case it makes me less sympathetic, because it just smacks of grifting.
Why is Harvey always saying the default is that the deposit IS refundable and Judge Milan always saying the deposit IS NOT refundable. My understanding is that the default position is that the deposit is not refundable.
5:25 This is why I love watching PPC on RUclips so I can bypass the nonsense of the people on the street. It shows how ignorant we are as a society... Only in America!
Seems Mr. Turner might want to take his mother or father with him and hold his hand for comfort. He was lucky in that that woman is a scoundrel & the judge helped him out.
So that’s two cases in a row that were based on a deposit and said deposit was going to be partially refunded. In one case judge ruled for defendant and the other for plaintiff. Way to go with consistency there Judge Milan ?
Was she ever going to return his deposit, 'cause she's a money grabber! She was trying to pull the wool over his eyes. Who wears jeans to court and owns a business, shady lady!
Deposit is generally non-refundable. And he knew that employment had to be verified. She is a businessperson and knows about the non-refundable deposits, part of the course and the plaintiff had remorse.
I had a dealership sell the suv I put a deposit down on. They told me they were buffing out a dent and then it would be ready then I called them a week later they told me they sold my car and refused to give me my deposit I threatened to call a lawyer and I got a call that day with I can go pick up my check for my deposit dealer's do this all the time take peoples money and that money is for the intended car not for another car or one u chose to give someone.
I guarantee that initial SUV hadn't been on the lot in ages. But, I also feel that the Plaintiff was a bit flaky and had buyer's remorse after putting down the deposit. The Defendant's problem is that she agreed to refund the deposit in the first place. Had she not, the Plaintiff would have been out of luck.
Why the hell would they be asking for a check before the guy even “saw” the car????? Yeah, that was just some bullshit scam.. personally, that would have been enough for me; no way in hell would I even consider doing business with someone that started out shady as hell.. Plus, I would take one look at that woman and RUN in the other direction; she “looks” like she’s about to con someone…
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
I see why she did not want her business name stated. Bad business but her face is still on the internet forever 😂
Ugh! I swear this judge hears ONLY what she wants to!! The Defendant has told her TWICE NOW she did agree to return a partial refund of his deposit which JM HERSELF SAID JUST A MINUTE BEFORE she starts hounding the Defendant why hasn’t she returned Plaintiffs $ back!! MAKE-UP YOUR MIND JM!!
Oh my! Plaintiff tells Doug this was his FIRST time trying to buy a car by himself! Really? At his age? (Dude has to be in his 40’s or late 30’s at least? & he sounds normal??!) -what did I miss?
She was shady. I don't think she ever called him. He probably gave up. Mysteriously, he was approved.
I don't understand why the Judge didn't press the fact, that she said she called him and said he was approved and he said she never called him to say he was approved. The Judge just keeps laughing everything off, not sure why. It was annoying.
@@barbarawallach1334 Are you related to the defendant? It would seem so LOL. What's annoying is that the defendant acted like a womachild "I got annoyed at him". Unless there was proof the plaintiff received that call it really is he/she said, unlike the texts where the defendant told the plaintiff she "tried" refunding him.
Yeah, the minute I heard the defendant didn't want her last name nor company named....I knew something was up!
This is a normal practice for most companies and those whose run them whether guilty or innocent. Accusations stick to companies. Doesn't matter if the accusations are proven false. With very public cases like this, there is potential for keyboard warriors to harass and drive down a company's rep with spiteful negative reviews. Anonymity isn't the defendant's problem. Her behavior is.
Correct! She's the Owner. I could see if she wasn't the Owner but, she IS.
I wouldn't deal with them as soon as they told me the car they offered me was randomly sold. Especially if it takes awhile to get verified. They knew the original car was already being sold.
That's not what happened. The car he originally saw in the magazine that he went to look at was sold prior to his arrival. He test drove and put deposit on a different vehicle
@szandor facts 😂
Right, I totally think that this car dealership for "credit challenged" takes full advantage of people with the bait and switch and then assumes they will buy something else at their used car dealership. I learned a valuable lesson, I will never sign anything without a document stating I will not get my money back if the deal falls through. This lady is a person that preys on low income people with credit issues, that makes me mad in itself, credit issues can happen for many reasons , not just being late on a payment. I can relate.
The same thing happed to my daughter and myself. We had already given them a deposit of 1000.00, they sold the car right from under us!
The bait-and-switch car was probably gone minutes after they took the pictures for the ad months before. If they ever even owned the vehicle. Would not be surprised to learn they snuck onto another lot somewhere and took a picture of a random nice SUV.
The whole reason people talk about bad and shady car dealers summed in one bad and shady episode. They should say her name and the name of the "dealership" every time they addressed her!!!!!
Doug's laugh... I want to download it for a ringtone on my phone!
To take an advantage of “credit challenge” folks like she says, is F’d up!
You knew the verification process but they don’t!!! Don’t sell people dreams! Especially desperate people!!!! Smh
... what are you talking about exactly? She told him how long it takes to get verified and explained the process to him. He was then verified within a day and she immediately called him and told him. What "dreams" is she selling? If anyone got their hopes up here then it's because they are unreasonable and don't pay attention when people explain things. It would not be her fault since she explains the process every time and then calls the customer as soon as they are verified. You sound like a Karen. You would just yell at the employee if the process took 2 days even after they tell you it could take up to a week and then if you aren't approved you would insist it was somehow their fault. You're not being rational. If ppl want to "dream/get their hopes up" that's their own fault and she cannot stop that nor is she responsible for the feelings and actions of a grown adult.
Why are they “credit challenged”? They don’t pay their bills. It’s called credit risk, Carolyn. This is news to you?
@@MalloriaAnn What are you talking about?
Write your opinion on the video like everyone else. Idgaf what you think!
Writing that endless paragraph was pointless mAlLoRY
@@brickstine202 She, the defendant in the case said “credit challenged” or whatever she said to call her main clientele.
She targets that audience
@@MalloriaAnn she did a bait and switch on him first , and then they used their sales tactics to pressure him into puting down a deposit on a vehicle with bad brakes for goodness sakes ! i agree with the verdict .
My man Doug does not hold back. He says whatever is on his mind when they're leaving court 🤣🤣🤣
It's a trait I wish I had.
In this instance, she caused a lot of the annoyance herself by lying to him regarding returning his deposit. Had she just returned what she promised, he would’ve been out of her life. Sounds like she felt some kind of way because he changed his mind about buying the car and thought she would get her little “lick back” by giving him the runaround.
i agree with the verdict . first this lady does a bait and switch on the guy and then they try to sell him a vehicle with BAD BRAKES , and then she finally says she will return his money but she in reality never does return his money . people like her is just another reason used car dealers have such a bad reputation .
she makes you hate car sales men , just looking at her you can see con artist
I'm glad he got his deposit back from this shady lady. If possible, always take someone who is familiar with cars or the car buying process with you when shopping for cars. It can be very overwhelming and you can easily get taken advantage of by salesmen when they see you don't know any better.
@marilynwillett804 Age has nothing to do with it. Maaany people utilize the bus, subway, walk or even bike as a mode of transportation. Some all their lives. So not everyone knows a lot about cars or the car buying experience. Have a little grace. I’m sure this is a lesson learned for this gentleman.
Doug be provoking the people that lose I swear 😂
He is very bold sure they had security guard
Doug looks like he can handle himself
It’s like Doug be tryna get a mf to be pissed 😂 “you wasted time, you coulda saved a trip to court. Oh well that’s the way the cookie crumbles” 💀💀💀
He do bd tryna make people mad and gets mad when hey not mad lol
@@shalequisedavis 😂😂😂 he so aggy!! Like why are you like this Doug?!
Why
yes lol he’s an instigator
He just be speaking facts 😂😂😂
I can see Doug at the pearly gates dishing out the hard truth. Lol
I’m dying over here. 😂😂😂😂😂
i agree with the verdict . first this lady does a bait and switch on the guy and then they try to sell him a vehicle with BAD BRAKES , and then she finally says she will return his money but she in reality never does return his money . people like her is just another reason used car dealers have such a bad reputation .
I don't doubt it's a shady outfit.
People are greedy, and quick to take advantage of others.
She’s shady, he wanted a specific car and they sold it. She knew she was wrong which is why she told him she was going to give him his deposit back.
She wasn't in the wrong however untill she told him shed give him the deposit back and then consistently lying about it being done. Without that the plaintiff would have lost. The actual car sale was done on the up and up, it was his choice to buy that specific car.
@@MR.Drowsy158 I hear you but that should have been a red flag for him. If you’re promised a car and already have your money for a specific car and they promised that car and when you go to pick it up and they told you they sold it and offer a different car……they’d lose my business. Idk 🤷🏼♀️ good business owners don’t do certain things.
If plaintiff had a credit union, which he stated. He should have gone through them for financing not the dealer. Lesson learned.
he put a deposit down on a specific car. they sold the car out from under him. he gets a refund. she is a scammer.
Not what happened you need to go back & rewatch the case
Right. That isn’t what happened. The car that got him in the dealer got sold. They didn’t sell it from under him, it was sold before he ever got in the store. He made a deposit and then got cold feet about the car which is fine but he isn’t owed the full deposit. The fact he wants “pain and suffering” shows he probably was a pain to deal with…
And it was his first car by himself!? He had no idea what he was doing.
@@JohnnyEnrico So you're a scammer?
They got him there with a false advertisement, these scammers car dealerships do it all the time, once there they find a way to scam people out their money, they abuse the most vulnerable 😡
@@zaiturcotte1576 no they didn't. He went there without contacting based on a magazine ad(when the car gets sold they can't go mark it as sold in every single copy of the magazine).
He chose to look and put a deposit on a different vehicle
I see why she didn’t want the dealer place named lol .
The "ypu are so full of it" smile the Judge gave her at "credit-challenged. LOL.
How the hell are you going to call it a deposit if he doesn't get the item he put the money down on? Guy didn't leave the lot with the car, car was never transferred over into his name. He paid her money to hold onto her own shit.
Lol when they hide their buisness name more than likely they’re in the wrong
Alot of dirty people just think no one will take the time to sue them after being screwed over...think again
When the plaintiff made first contact with the defendant inquiring about the SUV I guarantee you that the SUV was already gone & the defendant just strung this guy along to get him to her dealership where she would try to sell him something totally different. The defendant clearly had some physical disfigurements & I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't arise from her trying to deceive a previous buyer with her same game & got knocked out.
She definitely been had that truck sold and she just wanted to get him there
Yes I was wondering about her face one side looks higher than the other
SHADY dealership. i was in the same situation where i went to look at a car 2hrs away and they never told me they sold it when i spoke to them before i left my home. get there and they tell me to see if i want anything on the lot. i was beyond pissed and did not trust them at that point. told them to kick rocks. these little dealerships are scams
Awwe, he seems a bit delayed. I'm really happy he got his money back ❤
She thinks she can take advantage of "credit challenged" folks 😒😒
She’s a con!! Beware of her!!
The car was sold when he 1st inquired about it.
How is what's his face going to sit there after the episode and say if not specified it's usually refundable when the Judge literally just said the opposite lol
She is a scammer and I hope everyone sees this. I don't agree that they are allowed to withhold the business name!!! She definitely needs to be exposed for the fraudulent business she owns! The plaintiff deserves everything back and more.
Good judgement on the simple fact she SAID she would give him a refund.
The look on him face when he finds out he literally being made whole, is ridiculous. Why is he so pissed off? You won, you're back at zero, man.
Maybe that’s the way his face looks!
He didn’t look pissed off to me. Just a plain face. Plus his head turn was probably towards Douglas when he tells the litigants to hold on at the end.
He didn’t look pissed at all.
Judge said a couple of episodes down the line the exact opposite. She said the default position is non refundable deposit unless written otherwise.
12:07 wth is the lady on the far end on the right in the purple listening to our looking at?! 😂
They sold the SUV he wanted? I bet they didn't even have it.
This lady is talking out the side of her mouth, literally 🤥
The Man deserved his money back ..he had not took delivery!!!
T-A-K-E-N
Taken, not “took.”
She should have told him her big spiel before he took an hour bus ride. I have no respect for dishonest business people. Karma is going to get her good for being such an azzhole
Defendant is a liar.
He’s lucky that he got his money back. You put a deposit down and change your mind too bad . If she never told him she would give him his money back he would not of gotten it.
She was shady from the start!
Thanks judge,that was fair
Thanks!! For agreeing with the fair decision of the judge 👩⚖️.
After ppl take your $, then you want it back, now you are annoying. She's a crook.
Facts
he is still looking for a car , so the actual lesson he learned is its hard to find a car that runs good and looks good for only 4 or 5 grand anymore .
She's a crook!!!
Stealerships do that all the time, advertise a specific car with very attractive numbers. Once they get you there the car you wanted was conveniently _"sold this weekend, but I have something else for you on the lot."_ Yeah and the alternate cars are always more expensive. That car was probably never there to begin and if it was a courtesy call to him would have been nice before he came there.
Never and I mean NEVER buy a car from people like this
She did a switch and bait
One thing about Doug he gon make u feel worse after a loss 😂😂😂😂
Facts. 🤣🤣
He should have taken someone with him. He doesn't seem to knowledgeable about cars.
or speaking and in some ways answering questoins lol im surprsied more dont ask qs
True. Plus he said he had never purchased a car before.
Plus that boy look fifty years and talkin bout it's his first time buying a car😮
His facial expressions during the case is scary
It’s definitely not voluntary it looks like she either had a stroke or has Bell’s palsy
she said he lol thast what she said howver i think she meant she and u know im surprsied i never thought that could be why or some eye condition but ya i think theres more twitching if a stroke not sure, my step who im iffy with but ok with lately had a stroke hes recovered from 1 b4 but im not sure how bad this 1 was but it snuds like a fall may have also happened and he was in a wc in a bigopen concept house with lots of stuff and my mom has health probs notonly is it hard for me to get to them but my mom n i have had a strained reli and falling out and shes toxic n she doesnt see it so isnt doing much to really truely try n fix it , anyway but this was recent wel the mom part almost 2.5 months already but my steps stroke so i cant believi didnt think that could be the case, maybe i was just that absorbed in the case
I’ve heard Judge Millian multiple times say that non-refundable is the default if refundable isn’t written for a deposit. Harvey said the opposite at the end of this video.
This case COMPLETELY contradicts what the judge said in the last case I watched. In the last case she said if the contract doesn't say the deposit is non-refundable, its assumed to be refundable... but in this case its different?... She just be pulling "laws" out of her a** with all that fast talking. She could never be a real judge
ETA for reference: that case was called "Cooking Up a Lawsuit" posted on 4/17/23
Exactly sometimes she says "you don't have to prove without doubt just that it more than likely happened" then says "there's not enough proof" when it's obviously more than likely😂 even to her standard.
This lady is so shady. I don’t think she was ever going to give him the car.
You don't sell a car that someone wanted to buy it. She is a crook! I'm glad the Plaintiff won! She's the pain in the tush!
Most of my customers are credit challenged. Yea lady because that’s who you’ve geared your business towards, just so she can do what you did in this case. Bait, switch and swindle.
What's up with the defendants eyebrows?😮
Harvey just gave contradictory legal advise than what the judge normally gives
That’s exactly what I was thinking. She says that if it’s not specifically stated that the deposit is refundable then it’s nonrefundable by default!?
The plaintiff was clueless. The defendant took advantage of his ignorance.
Am I the only person who noticed that bad edit at 0:26? LOL
most of us fast-forward thru the opening.
😂 😂 😂 😂 Yesterday's case that lady was crazyyyy
Lol, I was like who tf is that 😂
She was so shady from the jump and thought she can take advantage because her customers are “challenged”. I would never do business with someone who speaks about their customers like that.
she said 'credit challenged'
If you put down a deposit you better be leaving with a car that day! If a car has mechanical issues and it's sitting on a lot let that be a red flag.
I hoped this guy learned what shady looks and sounds like. He should have got back on that bus when they told him the vehicle he went to get was sold!
It's always hilarious when plaintiffs ask for "pain and suffering" for what is obviously a contracts case. Even if the plaintiff has a good case it makes me less sympathetic, because it just smacks of grifting.
Ha. Yup. As soon as I heard pain and suffering in the intro I was like umm no.... not for this.
The problem is people don't actually know what this means or what is covered under it. It's very much an "armchair lawyer" kind of term.
Harley Davidson dealership did almost the same thing to me. Had to stop payment at the bank.
It’s the “ I’m trying to work with you” bs line that irks me every time.
Doug had her eating out of his hand
Why is Harvey always saying the default is that the deposit IS refundable and Judge Milan always saying the deposit IS NOT refundable. My understanding is that the default position is that the deposit is not refundable.
Because his story is kinda funky ...the way he's explaining it.
5:25 This is why I love watching PPC on RUclips so I can bypass the nonsense of the people on the street. It shows how ignorant we are as a society... Only in America!
The plaintiff is not the brightest candle on the cake.
Lord dont use her.
I could see maybe keeping $150 but a grand? You have to be kidding me.
Should only given him half so they both learn a lesson.
Moral of the story: don’t trust anyone who squints one eye and talks out the side of their mouth.
Seems Mr. Turner might want to take his mother or father with him and hold his hand for comfort.
He was lucky in that that woman is a scoundrel & the judge helped him out.
“I worked my butt of for him” 💩 we all work for a living, it’s your job. Plaintiff bit suspect too but where does it say NO REFUNDS? 🤔
Very Bad Ruling! And unlawful!
So that’s two cases in a row that were based on a deposit and said deposit was going to be partially refunded. In one case judge ruled for defendant and the other for plaintiff. Way to go with consistency there Judge Milan ?
This needs to be an audio only upload
Huh?
Pay the plantiff back now... Lying defendant annoyed me scamming ass..
First case, plaintiff, a grown man’s tie should reach his belt.
what if hes not wearing 1 ? and was there another case in this ?? lol
I see via your past comments that you are the “tie police.” 😏
@@jennzifur I am. Are you ok with that?
She takes advantage of ppl. No way in hell should they be taking ppls money and they not leaving with their car
Yeah it's about time these sketchy dealers r held accountable.
Wow what a shady lady!
She stringed him along...hoping he would just give up and keep the money.
Does anybody know what the name of her dealership is?
Thanks
You hit the nail on the head - she was hoping he’d give up. Despicable business woman!!
She come court with a burst mouth... she lucky that's all she got with that shady business dealings
Was she ever going to return his deposit, 'cause she's a money grabber! She was trying to pull the wool over his eyes. Who wears jeans to court and owns a business, shady lady!
I was on her side until the texts were read. Wow super shady!
He look so mad, I would be too, glad he won
Every dealership ive been to if i don't agree to the bank loan terms i have been able to get my deposit back for both big and little car dealerships
Exactly! Unless you’ve signed a contract! She is a liar.
If I remember right
By law contract law says there is X amount of time to cancel a contract
Deposit is generally non-refundable. And he knew that employment had to be verified. She is a businessperson and knows about the non-refundable deposits, part of the course and the plaintiff had remorse.
Go to 12:05 of the video and let us know if "generally" you have a different comment
Doug is to hands on with the ladies.
“To?!”
I had a dealership sell the suv I put a deposit down on. They told me they were buffing out a dent and then it would be ready then I called them a week later they told me they sold my car and refused to give me my deposit I threatened to call a lawyer and I got a call that day with I can go pick up my check for my deposit dealer's do this all the time take peoples money and that money is for the intended car not for another car or one u chose to give someone.
She is shady as a tree and he isn't smart enough to make up a story like this .
Wow - the Bait and Switch scam.
He sounds like Norbit. Or Sammy Davis Jr
She shouldn't have played him like that.
He's clearly challenged, she knew what she was doing 🙄
I guarantee that initial SUV hadn't been on the lot in ages. But, I also feel that the Plaintiff was a bit flaky and had buyer's remorse after putting down the deposit. The Defendant's problem is that she agreed to refund the deposit in the first place. Had she not, the Plaintiff would have been out of luck.
Thats why I use a credit card for car deposits.
Why the hell would they be asking for a check before the guy even “saw” the car????? Yeah, that was just some bullshit scam.. personally, that would have been enough for me; no way in hell would I even consider doing business with someone that started out shady as hell..
Plus, I would take one look at that woman and RUN in the other direction; she “looks” like she’s about to con someone…