Transient Testing the UNI-T UT33A+ 2000 count DMM

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 5 окт 2024
  • Testing the UNI-T UT33A+
    UNI-T UT181A Part 2 Comparing the grill starters waveform against the IEC standards.
    • The UNI-T UT181A Datal...
    Feel free to join the thread:
    www.eevblog.com...
    The data for the meters I have tested may be found here: docs.google.co...
    Answers to Frequently Asked Questions may be found here: docs.google.co...

Комментарии • 22

  • @Nazmi_PWM.C
    @Nazmi_PWM.C 6 месяцев назад +3

    Buy the most expensive multimeter, then throw it down from a height of 30 meters and say, oh, it broke. Or buy an entry level device and connect it to the high voltage line. oh it burned. Damn, I'm going to buy a Bugatti Chiron car and go off-road, let's see what happens.

    • @joesmith-je3tq
      @joesmith-je3tq  6 месяцев назад +4

      You're pretty naive if you don't think cars are tested to failure. Many products are. Any handheld meter that has been certified for safety will have been tested to far more stringent standards than what I show. Maybe take the time to learn something about the topic before you post. Assuming others may share your feelings about what is being shown, I have gone ahead and pinned your comment.

    • @absurdengineering
      @absurdengineering 6 месяцев назад +1

      Those CAT markings on the meter actually mean something., they are specs, just like alcohol content or gold content on a product. If the meter fails the tests prescribed by the standards that it claims to confirm to, then the manufacturer is blatantly lying. Nobody forced their hand. They didn’t have to say 80% good when it’s just 50%. Easy as that.
      What you propose is 1984-style doublespeak where words mean anything anyone wants them to mean. Why are you advocating for manufacturers blatantly lying to their customers? They do it out of their own free will. They don’t have to lie. Do you think their meters wouldn’t sell if they marked them consistent with demonstrated performance, rather than someone’s fantasy?
      To understand what you propose, really go and read Orwell’s 1984. It’s same stuff really.

  • @ligius3
    @ligius3 6 месяцев назад +5

    Thank you for taking hours of your time to do this. I thik manufacturers are really paying attention, once you have the model number and it's the only litterate video making a good review.

  • @fuloplehel
    @fuloplehel 6 месяцев назад +2

    Great testing as always, for the price I think this is a good meter.

  • @daviddevillers6790
    @daviddevillers6790 6 месяцев назад +3

    Fireworks in March! Thanks for the video.

  • @MrDoneboy
    @MrDoneboy 6 месяцев назад +1

    Joe, You..."Take it to the Limit", on these meters! Lol

  • @kicikcayaxarsu8100
    @kicikcayaxarsu8100 5 месяцев назад +1

    Salam UNI-T 61B+ multimetrəni test etsəniz sevinərəm

  • @noneofabove5586
    @noneofabove5586 6 месяцев назад +1

    Looks like they pay attention to your testing.

  • @wktodd
    @wktodd 6 месяцев назад +3

    Has the grill starter lost its mojo? :-)

    • @joesmith-je3tq
      @joesmith-je3tq  6 месяцев назад +2

      It is a mechanical device and will certainly wear out. It's only used to test the meters so it doesn't get a lot of use. But to your point, I could measure it again and see how much it has changed.

  • @LawpickingLocksmith
    @LawpickingLocksmith 6 месяцев назад +1

    Jerryscrewseverything would have bent it to cracks and scored the display with his cigarette lighter!

  • @mazindeft5529
    @mazindeft5529 6 месяцев назад

    Could you try one of the following models UT117C / UT17B MAX/ UT191T/ UT195DS/ UT89XE/ UT89X please

    • @juancarlossandoval5628
      @juancarlossandoval5628 5 месяцев назад

      I second the motion,, I have the 117c and I love it. it's like the fluke 117 with more features added

  • @VoeViking
    @VoeViking 6 месяцев назад +2

    Uni-T devices always seem to be a bit gimmicky. Would not buy one.

    • @mazindeft5529
      @mazindeft5529 6 месяцев назад +2

      You should not look at cheap ones for UNI-T lol, try the professional versions, you will be impressed

    • @joesmith-je3tq
      @joesmith-je3tq  6 месяцев назад +3

      @@mazindeft5529 While I have looked at more UNI-T products than any other, I've yet to be impressed. The UT210E is pretty nice but lacks the quality. I do like the UT181A but it has too many problems.

    • @juancarlossandoval5628
      @juancarlossandoval5628 5 месяцев назад

      @@joesmith-je3tq please give a try on the 117c or the 17bmax, thank you

  • @msnerizaful
    @msnerizaful Месяц назад

    It is obviously a good quality tester, but do not do anything beyond it's limits

  • @gamiwv
    @gamiwv 6 месяцев назад +1

    Not bud at all (for the price)

    • @joesmith-je3tq
      @joesmith-je3tq  6 месяцев назад +5

      I think some of the other low cost meters people asked to see may be a better choice. Wait and see.

    • @gamiwv
      @gamiwv 6 месяцев назад +2

      @@joesmith-je3tq I do. (I'm watching the channel)