The concept of global leadership must undergo a complete transformation. We need a new global collective vision. We need collective security founded on justice. Therefore, a new democratic global governance is essential. Without it, chaos will accelerate. Why no one talks about these issues?
Chapters (Powered by ChapterMe) - 00:00 - Power imbalance in institutions 00:39 - US President Barack Obamas Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech 04:50 - Disruption offers humanity best chance to build a fairer world 05:32 - Globalization is not over despite headwinds 07:14 - USChina energy cooperation longterm trend, stable 10:34 - Chinas restrictions on tech innovation 11:26 - Global demands for access to effective AI 13:37 - AIs potential for global development 17:18 - The United States does not need a Cold War with China 19:03 - Global leadership crisis US, China abdicate, Israels role 22:12 - Russias role in Ukraines future, diplomacy, EU integration 24:12 - Russias economic and political pressure on Ukraine 25:10 - Ukraines prospects for membership in NATO remain uncertain 29:19 - Israels war in Gaza and its impact on Palestinians 31:26 - EastWest tensions in the Middle East 34:21 - Global leaders face crisis of democracy in US 38:46 - Lawsuits against election fraud 39:56 - Japans role in global leadership 43:15 - World leaders reliance on Japan for leadership 44:33 - Welcoming to GO Summit
Ian always provides solid balanced commentary. It does feel however that the world is in some sort of cold war environment given everything unfolding out there though.
I disagree with Ian Bremmer in some areas, but he's a good speaker and I share his preference for global cooperation over war. I found it puzzling that like many mainstream journalists and speakers lately, IAN avoided mentioning BRICS, which is a growing global development central to his topic. Is it because the growth of BRICS brings his perception of our western dominated 'global world order' into question?
Is BRICS even really a thing though? The Brazilians are western hemisphere centric. The Russians are international pariahs. The Indians are quasi-isolationists. The Chinese are having major economic problems, and South Africa is a basket case. There's no alliance there economic or otherwise. They all have seperate interests, that some times clash violently like with the Chinese and the Indians who are the two most powerful members since the Russians invaded Ukraine.
@@chrisreed4065 That may have been so, but global alliances are shifting. Many new countries have requested inclusion into BRICS, presumably to bypass the US$ and/or to avoid US tariffs. BRICS is growing as a trade alternative and it's at least worthy of consideration.
@@JohnPartyka So let's say that they come up with a BRICS dollar. Who mananges it? The Chinese? They would manipulate it to the other members expense. The Russians? Same deal. The Brazilians don't have the wherewithal and anyone who would suggest South Africa would be laughed out the room. That leaves the Indians, the Russians might go for that but the Chinese would walk. This would also mean that India would stop being a fence-sitter in regards to U.S./Russia which would be a complete one-eighty of their foreign policy since the founding of the nation, by putting them firmly on the Russian side. If not in actuality then at least in the mind of the U.S. State Department.
During the joint session on January 6, 2017, seven House Democrats tried to object to electoral votes from multiple states.Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) objected to Alabama's votes. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) objected to Florida's votes. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) objected to Georgia's votes. Raul Grijalva (D-Ariz.) objected to North Carolina's votes. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas) objected to the votes from North Carolina in addition to votes from South Carolina and Wisconsin. She also stood up and objected citing "massive voter suppression" after Mississippi's votes were announced. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) brought up allegations of Russian interference in the election and malfunctioning voting machines when she objected following the announcement of Michigan's votes. Maxine Waters (D-Calif) rose and said, "I do not wish to debate. I wish to ask 'Is there one United States senator who will join me in this letter of objection?'" after the announcement of Wyoming's votes.
A lot of strength and courage needed in global leadership which Ian claims is absent? Ian why are you not running for President? Those that can’t do …….. preach!!
Before AI ,US needs to learn moral values.Shut down your hegemony and begging for other's resources .you have destroyed every country from Hiroshima,Nagasaki to Genocide in Palestine......
Damn didn’t knew US was at war with any middle eastern country right now? Remind who stop each other in Middle East form striking either side for no benefit of itself as low oil prices which US does not buy? The world connects in the Middle East and the us doesn’t need any of them, but for some reason keeps the peace? It’s hilarious you bring up WW2 as if post war Japan isn’t a better country for the world and the Japanese themself
@@Ashley-o2m5z its definitely done more harm than good, everyone can see that now. there is no goodness in the west. it's only value is murdering others and taking their resources
this complex lesson about geopolitical and it's security impact to the people around the world as well as supper power struggles between chine and USA, and lack of one leadership in the world
I make an observation here. US lost the global leadership as of today. The reason is because by 90s, the US focused solely on gaining through trade of war-based economy model. China, on the other hand was more strategic in the last 20 years. They consolidated their economic ties across the globe, while upgrading their manufacturing technologies in-house. This offers them a better trajectory to hold & sustain their global leadership position in the next two decades.
I don’t even think they could find somebody cutthroat like Kissinger anymore they’ll get some ideologue or somebody that has only bad choices and is too afraid to make one. From either side I expect another empty suit who just kisses everyone at or events from ideologue reasons instead of us interests
Good talk though as an Israeli with a day by day understanding of the Middle East I disagree with the statement that Netanyahu does not want peace and prosperity and a cooperative just and equitable end to the current conflicts. But the west allows the obvious reality to be subverted by its inability to accept what the pro Muslim Brotherhood and Palestinian street and Iran terrorist say and do openly and privately.
The only reason the japanese are so outspoken about nuclear weapons is to make them look like the victim during WWII, ask them why they were on the receiving end of nuclear weapons and watch how fast the topic goes sideways...
@@thewolfofswingthat2035 that argument could work against the US citizens if, God forbid, we receive a nuclear attack. Is it fair for the citizens to get bombed? Nuclear weapons are not fair for the people who pay for their government’s geopolitical agendas.
gosh, what evidence does Ian have that any of that AI stuff is really going to work at all -- I think he's getting influenced by his sponsors' hype, marketing and PR (that drives up stock values without delivering anything)
Evidence shows that the internet has been effective and has brought wealth to many people. However, its potential was overpromised. It seems the same pattern is emerging with AI.
Like the FTSE or S&P 500, the institutions like UNSC , IMF etc members should be changing based on a formula of economic prowess and population. The UK , Russia and France as members seem like relics of WW2
ChatCCP is not worked through enough. If ChatCCP is not competitive, but ChatGPT will destroy CCP’s authority, what is the choice that CCP will make? I doubt that it would be a choice of interdependence, since it would mean a suicide for CCP.
Ian really is a master orator. He really knows how to command a room. I disagree with his statement on Israel and the US being at fault for not bringing an end to the conflicts there. The status quo isn’t something that we can go back to there because it was never tenable in the first place.
Iran getting nuclear weapons is the biggest geo political issue we aren’t focusing on. It doesn’t look like anyone can really stop them save a boots on the ground intervention. Once they test a successful weapon, Saudi and the gulf states will quickly go nuclear. We are on the brink of a nuclear Middle East.
He's become a China shill. His talking points line up precisely to theirs. He is personal profit first, then patriotism. Sorry war first, then personal profit, then whatever that other word was. Welcome to 2024, these are our American intellectuals....
@@erichickox6852 yeah that’s true. I don’t know maybe it’s just the way they pronounce it. Maybe everybody in mainstream media is doing it wrong who the heck knows. At the same time maybe he’s doing it purposely like not you know what I mean? sorry I’m using talk text and I don’t have time for punctuation.
Thank you and team for the content, it's said in a way that I can digest. Best regards from a disabled USAF vet.
American values can be seen in Gaza and now in Lebanon.
And your Russian values we can see in Ukraine
@@ГлебВерховский-п2р The CIA's agenda are not Russian values.
@@roundnround365 usa is founded on genocide of whole continent
Its obvious that the US never wanted the peace deal between Russia and Ukraine in 2022 and sent little Boris to convince Ukraine to fight instead.
The concept of global leadership must undergo a complete transformation. We need a new global collective vision. We need collective security founded on justice. Therefore, a new democratic global governance is essential. Without it, chaos will accelerate.
Why no one talks about these issues?
Chapters (Powered by ChapterMe) -
00:00 - Power imbalance in institutions
00:39 - US President Barack Obamas Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech
04:50 - Disruption offers humanity best chance to build a fairer world
05:32 - Globalization is not over despite headwinds
07:14 - USChina energy cooperation longterm trend, stable
10:34 - Chinas restrictions on tech innovation
11:26 - Global demands for access to effective AI
13:37 - AIs potential for global development
17:18 - The United States does not need a Cold War with China
19:03 - Global leadership crisis US, China abdicate, Israels role
22:12 - Russias role in Ukraines future, diplomacy, EU integration
24:12 - Russias economic and political pressure on Ukraine
25:10 - Ukraines prospects for membership in NATO remain uncertain
29:19 - Israels war in Gaza and its impact on Palestinians
31:26 - EastWest tensions in the Middle East
34:21 - Global leaders face crisis of democracy in US
38:46 - Lawsuits against election fraud
39:56 - Japans role in global leadership
43:15 - World leaders reliance on Japan for leadership
44:33 - Welcoming to GO Summit
THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THIS IS SUPER HELPFUL!
Ian is so impressive. It’s so refreshing to hear this constructive dialog.
Ian always provides solid balanced commentary. It does feel however that the world is in some sort of cold war environment given everything unfolding out there though.
Sensible voice saying sensible things. What universe is this
Thank you lan.
So Israel will be a lone island over there? And you didn't say what will happen with the Palestinians.
Brilliant, a rare man without an agenda or illusions
He likes to demonise the leaders of countries that the US is not able to influence or regime change. No agenda? Really?
Great talk!
Thanks so much. Yes, we - from sub saharan Africa - continue to benefit from globalization in many ways.
I disagree with Ian Bremmer in some areas, but he's a good speaker and I share his preference for global cooperation over war. I found it puzzling that like many mainstream journalists and speakers lately, IAN avoided mentioning BRICS, which is a growing global development central to his topic. Is it because the growth of BRICS brings his perception of our western dominated 'global world order' into question?
BRICS is a nonentity. Irrelevant. They have been talking since 2009
@@JohnPartyka I feel like he's not ready to talk about it until we see what will follow with the recent summit in Russia
Is BRICS even really a thing though? The Brazilians are western hemisphere centric. The Russians are international pariahs. The Indians are quasi-isolationists. The Chinese are having major economic problems, and South Africa is a basket case. There's no alliance there economic or otherwise. They all have seperate interests, that some times clash violently like with the Chinese and the Indians who are the two most powerful members since the Russians invaded Ukraine.
@@chrisreed4065 That may have been so, but global alliances are shifting. Many new countries have requested inclusion into BRICS, presumably to bypass the US$ and/or to avoid US tariffs. BRICS is growing as a trade alternative and it's at least worthy of consideration.
@@JohnPartyka So let's say that they come up with a BRICS dollar. Who mananges it? The Chinese? They would manipulate it to the other members expense. The Russians? Same deal. The Brazilians don't have the wherewithal and anyone who would suggest South Africa would be laughed out the room. That leaves the Indians, the Russians might go for that but the Chinese would walk. This would also mean that India would stop being a fence-sitter in regards to U.S./Russia which would be a complete one-eighty of their foreign policy since the founding of the nation, by putting them firmly on the Russian side. If not in actuality then at least in the mind of the U.S. State Department.
During the joint session on January 6, 2017, seven House Democrats tried to object to electoral votes from multiple states.Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) objected to Alabama's votes.
Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) objected to Florida's votes.
Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) objected to Georgia's votes.
Raul Grijalva (D-Ariz.) objected to North Carolina's votes.
Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas) objected to the votes from North Carolina in addition to votes from South Carolina and Wisconsin. She also stood up and objected citing "massive voter suppression" after Mississippi's votes were announced.
Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) brought up allegations of Russian interference in the election and malfunctioning voting machines when she objected following the announcement of Michigan's votes.
Maxine Waters (D-Calif) rose and said, "I do not wish to debate. I wish to ask 'Is there one United States senator who will join me in this letter of objection?'" after the announcement of Wyoming's votes.
Ian's latest version of Humpty Dumpty😂
A lot of strength and courage needed in global leadership which Ian claims is absent? Ian why are you not running for President? Those that can’t do …….. preach!!
The west should deeply think why the west doesn’t feel good.
Great work. Shows what we’re facing
Don’t worry, BRICS can fix all.
He’s makes so much sense! Brilliant speaker!
Before AI ,US needs to learn moral values.Shut down your hegemony and begging for other's resources .you have destroyed every country from Hiroshima,Nagasaki to Genocide in Palestine......
Damn didn’t knew US was at war with any middle eastern country right now? Remind who stop each other in Middle East form striking either side for no benefit of itself as low oil prices which US does not buy? The world connects in the Middle East and the us doesn’t need any of them, but for some reason keeps the peace? It’s hilarious you bring up WW2 as if post war Japan isn’t a better country for the world and the Japanese themself
Do you feel the USA has done more harm or good to the world… maybe if you could see the craziness when we step back and you will be done
@@Ashley-o2m5zUSA literally created a lot of crazy too like Al Qaeda and ISIS
@@Ashley-o2m5z its definitely done more harm than good, everyone can see that now. there is no goodness in the west. it's only value is murdering others and taking their resources
Excelente. Gracias Ian!
this complex lesson about geopolitical and it's security impact to the people around the world as well as supper power struggles between chine and USA,
and lack of one leadership in the world
I make an observation here.
US lost the global leadership as of today.
The reason is because by 90s, the US focused solely on gaining through trade of war-based economy model.
China, on the other hand was more strategic in the last 20 years. They consolidated their economic ties across the globe, while upgrading their manufacturing technologies in-house. This offers them a better trajectory to hold & sustain their global leadership position in the next two decades.
He has point with Israel. America didn't bother to use their influence to stop this war
@@jaishah1925 because they don't have any influence now
I don’t even think they could find somebody cutthroat like Kissinger anymore they’ll get some ideologue or somebody that has only bad choices and is too afraid to make one. From either side I expect another empty suit who just kisses everyone at or events from ideologue reasons instead of us interests
Exactly.
Maybe those who have real influence in America are right wing Zionists who believe in an ethnically cleansed Israel
one thing is to make sure that the so called allies, partners or servants don't look the way.
Relatively fair assessment
the fact that he gave this talk in japan, a country which was and still is subjugated by the USA, says it all
I see Ian, I click.
Remarkable speaker.
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
BRAVO! BRAVO! BRAVO!
❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
One day we will elect an AI platform as president of US. It will know so much better how to rule the country.
sobering
Good work Ian. Some Visuals would be even better
Good talk though as an Israeli with a day by day understanding of the Middle East I disagree with the statement that Netanyahu does not want peace and prosperity and a cooperative just and equitable end to the current conflicts. But the west allows the obvious reality to be subverted by its inability to accept what the pro Muslim Brotherhood and Palestinian street and Iran terrorist say and do openly and privately.
The only reason the japanese are so outspoken about nuclear weapons is to make them look like the victim during WWII, ask them why they were on the receiving end of nuclear weapons and watch how fast the topic goes sideways...
A thought for the millions of victims of Japanese fanatical racism
@@thewolfofswingthat2035 that argument could work against the US citizens if, God forbid, we receive a nuclear attack. Is it fair for the citizens to get bombed? Nuclear weapons are not fair for the people who pay for their government’s geopolitical agendas.
日本被美国的核武器轰炸和乌克兰被俄罗斯打击，背后的逻辑是一样的。
如果日本不发动太平洋战争，乌克兰不在乌克兰东部屠杀俄罗斯裔乌克兰人，所有的悲剧都不会发生。
Nothing justifes it.
gosh, what evidence does Ian have that any of that AI stuff is really going to work at all -- I think he's getting influenced by his sponsors' hype, marketing and PR (that drives up stock values without delivering anything)
Evidence shows that the internet has been effective and has brought wealth to many people. However, its potential was overpromised. It seems the same pattern is emerging with AI.
Like the FTSE or S&P 500, the institutions like UNSC , IMF etc members should be changing based on a formula of economic prowess and population. The UK , Russia and France as members seem like relics of WW2
⭐️
ChatCCP is not worked through enough. If ChatCCP is not competitive, but ChatGPT will destroy CCP’s authority, what is the choice that CCP will make? I doubt that it would be a choice of interdependence, since it would mean a suicide for CCP.
Did he get through the presentation without profanity.
Sometimes dropping some profanity adds that “oomph”. Adds impact to statements and can be beneficial. Also depends on who says it too lol
@@lrww5673 kind of silly from a dork likd him
@@GlobalDrifter1000 他的演讲内容是建立在俄罗斯在乌克兰使用核武器、朝鲜派兵帮助俄罗斯、中国和美国争夺世界的领导权等等这些虚假的前提下和个人臆想。
Ian really is a master orator. He really knows how to command a room.
I disagree with his statement on Israel and the US being at fault for not bringing an end to the conflicts there. The status quo isn’t something that we can go back to there because it was never tenable in the first place.
The US Navy should stop protecting the sea lanes for non-American shipping.
If globalization was a process rather than a stasis, and so too is de-globalization, then it has begun.
👍👍👍
👍👍👍👍👍
Iran getting nuclear weapons is the biggest geo political issue we aren’t focusing on. It doesn’t look like anyone can really stop them save a boots on the ground intervention.
Once they test a successful weapon, Saudi and the gulf states will quickly go nuclear. We are on the brink of a nuclear Middle East.
No, it's not the biggest geopolitical issue. Ukraine is. Only Russia is interested in strarting the global nuclear war.
if the west can have nukes so can the middle east. this is a non-issue
@@casey203 saudi even can't plug tv
Ian doesn’t do emphatic very well
He's become a China shill. His talking points line up precisely to theirs. He is personal profit first, then patriotism. Sorry war first, then personal profit, then whatever that other word was. Welcome to 2024, these are our American intellectuals....
Japan will try very hard being away from USA when time comes
This guy get so much wrong and has a very thin skin.
Who is "Notanyahu"? And why does this smart man keep calling him that?
Maybe, that is the way to say it.
@@RR-iq8ze How do you get "not" from "net"? No one else anywhere in the world in the media pronounces it this way.
@@erichickox6852 yeah that’s true. I don’t know maybe it’s just the way they pronounce it. Maybe everybody in mainstream media is doing it wrong who the heck knows. At the same time maybe he’s doing it purposely like not you know what I mean? sorry I’m using talk text and I don’t have time for punctuation.
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Settle down
USA styled propaganda by lan
Woody Allen
American QUAD is breaking down
India is getting out of Quad
Take the jacket off Ian. You’re sweating and will look & feel cool 😊