Why label the game footage 1080p then upload a 720p video... it makes no sense... Also... Are you sure the Xbox 360 is native 1080p or did you mess up on the editing as well as the render?
they even fking said that graphics are tied WHAT A FKING JOKE.... THAT is the simply one aspect you cant even argue about BF4 has far more superior visuals.
I always wonder if the people making these dumb comments a decade ago grew as people and realize how dumb they are now lol. Especially given how horrific Battlefield 4’s launch was, and how bad the campaign turned out to be.
If your planning to play ghosts on a pc then dont get ghosts for pc unless you can deal with the lag or untill the lag stops I would recommend if your gonna get ghosts now get it on a console because on a pc its very laggy even for the highest end graphics cards so I would hold on untill a patch comes out for the pc to buy ghosts on a pc but battlefield 4 looks epic to me sense i've been playing cod sense COD 4 this game really impresses me and I might pick it up myself but it all depends if you like Better graphics, More players on maps or vehicles. Also keep in mind that if you like more strategic gameplay you should go to battlefield im not saying that COD doesnt involve strategy it has alot to it but battlefield has a bit more realistic strategic gameplay when it comes down to it and COD is a fast pace arcade shooter it wont be as realistic or has as good of graphics as battlefield but the fast pace gameplay and fun make up for it but its up to your taste Fast pace arcade shooter or Realistic, Strategic gameplay its your choice personally I love both and I think there both great games to play Hope this helps ~TheMotionNInja :D
exactly how epic it is when you see 10 enemies running towards you at one time while you get the hell out of there with the other team shooting the shit out of you and you either die epic with a rambo spray or manage to get out of there and detonate a disaster load of C4. It's the only game that gets my adrenaline pumping and it's insane. You cannot compare . You will never get an experience like this in Cod, running around through small corridors injecting adrenaline and killing with no recoil
Dice should make the single player game as a sand box war game for training you of how to play the game. The more you learn and lvl your solider in "Boot camp" the better and more varies weapons you can use in the Multi-player game. The Multi-player game would be like deployment of your solider to complete the objective just like in real life. Am i the only gamer who thinks this could help a story mode problem???You cant have a sniper rifle if you've not trained with it and reached some lvl of expertise with it. I think it would be a blast to have to work your way up in single player to get the bounces in multi-player.
Oh, I may be wrong.. I was reading an article on IGN about how CoD Ghosts will run on native 1080p on PS4 and 720p on Xbone. Idk, it may have just been a rumor.
I've seen this get an 8-9.5 which is pretty fair. I would give this an 8.5 simply because of the campaign, it's like walking around with a broken foot and the campaign is this game's broken foot. They really tried with the campaign this time but unless the ultimate goal was to be a first-person narrative then what we got with single player was expected. The game looks and plays amazingly and I will be throwing countless hours into this game's multiplayer, just like the previous installment.
BF4 is basically the basic concept of BF(team-based all out war with vehicles), the Commander mode of BF2, the increased destruction of BFBC2, the visual flair of BF3, with the concept of Leveloution. Not to mention it has balanced classes.
How? There are easily 100 listable ways BF4 has improved over BF3 which I didn't think was possible, but they out did themselves at Dice. Only 1 thing I can think of that made BF3 better was being able to squad up PRIOR to joing a game and taking away that ability was an epic failure at Dice
Ratsass LOOL I also think BF4 is an improvement over BF3. BF4 is like a combination of BF2, BC2, and BF3. BF3 has way too little destruction aspects for my taste.
BF3 was in production for 6 years.. they released BF4 what.. a year and a half later ? Its using the same engine as BF3 with slight improvements.. its like a BF3 update.. rushed crap nobody needs...
The only reason games like these don't get better scores is because the campaigns are a waste of space. It's a multiplayer-centric shooter and shouldn't have a campaign
Though it sounds strange, Call of Duty campaigns are just, well, good. They're fun. The simplistic shooting makes it a blast to kill AI. The gunplay here works better in multiplayer, which is why the campaign's a little drier.
X360 and PS3 are current gen? They are like ten gens in past! They use hardware from almost ten years ago that could be shrunk into your tablet nowadays and software that is 14 years old! (actually, there are more powerful gaming tablets than PS3 and X360, like Razer Edge)
i would say get it for 5 thats what i did plus there free dlc right now and if you what the maps buy them seprate im sure you don't want all the maps and if you do buy the premium
don't get me wrong... bf4 is a solid game which i have played for about 300hours... BUT concidering that this score was set at release... it is waaaaaay to high! the singleplayer is utter shit and the multiplayer at this point in time was literally unplayable... i would have given 1/10 and would have warned anyone interessted to heavily consider whether a game in this stage is even worth a try! today after all those patches i think 8/10 would suffice because i personaly think that bf4 has some of the worst maps in the franchise and since maps are pretty important in multiplayer games i would argue that bf4 is the second worst battlefield yet... closely behind bf1... i'd prefer hardline over both of those every day
You can't penalise a game for it's community. Especially for the community of another game coming over. I have played all of the battlefields and I'm all about the teamwork. You get a much higher score for teamwork, the game rewards you for playing as a team and supporting each other.
I sure hope so, Battlefield 4 runs very smooth now in PS4 compared to launch so i am hoping its something of the WWII or Vietnam Era. It would be very refreshing to see that than a modern take.
But was the story good? It has too many plot holes and you can't have a good ending (or endings) without a good story. With that being said, Blops2 campaign is an improvement over MW3.
This got the same score as ghosts... what is this world coming to. once we have call of duty world at war 56 and battlefield bad company 24 the cod game will score higher.
I looked it up and it only got the same score from critics. But the score from users has a big difference. ghosts had a much lower score than Battlefield4
CupcakesDeluxe But the problem is that most user scores for cod:ghosts are from cod haters/bf fanboys. You can tell because on metacritic, most negative user reviews give the game a 0 or 1. Lets be honest, call of duty isnt that terrible. Most games should never receive a score that low. For example, "corodriguez" gave ghosts a zero because he hates how activison is releasing a cod every year. "XenoUltra12" gave the game a 2 because the ending wasnt good.
When a game has the same title but a different number expect essentially the same game with some upgrades. When a game has a different title expect a different game. Call of Duty Ghosts is a reboot of Call of Duty. Battlefield 4 is another Battlefield. How much change each title should have respectively is based on what type of iteration they are.
Everything you said was agreeable aside from the fact that you said "no one buys the game for its single player alone.why no higher score?" The single player MUST affect the verdict because it is a full priced 60 dollars game. It does not matter if you play the multiplayer alone (like me) it still affects the score
Mr. Hakim™ OMG! You mentioned how this is better than COD! I am so shocked! WOW!!! Seriously, give me a fucking break. A game being older or better than COD is NOT a selling point. And EA is a bigger moneywhore then Activision. Either that, or both are on par when it comes to moneywhoring.
I dont know about that, but i prefer the free stuff that EA gives every once in a while, unlike Activition that everything is micro DLC but thats just my opinion...
what the hell did i just watch? it's the same bloody game for christ sake, look at the vide! LOOK AT IT, it's a copy, how can people not see that?! you failed me Dice, not a game i will buy
What are you talking about? It looks way freaking different than the last game, and its called "Battlefield", it gives everything you wan't, and with bigger maps. Was you expecting a Zombie mode, giant mechs and shit like that?
No i was expecting something different, we already have BF3. Come up with NEW idea, it's a new game. New game doesn't mean add more stuff to the old one, it means make a NEW battlefield. ive seen so many people complaining that games like COD never changes, then what is happening right here. new time settings, new enemies, new IDEAS
***** But it is a new Battlefield, and it had changed a lot since 2002, gameplay had always been fun, and addicting. Why try fixing something, that isn't broken to begin with, its best just to add more gameplay elements, than to completely change, and destroying the entire franchise. CoD could use a change, but BF is perfect how it is.
Hunter Lee there is flaws with battlefield that COD is doing right, like the 60 fps fast paced combat. if only that were added to a battlefield game, with all the players, those huge maps, and all that, it would (for me) be the perfect FPS. but both games has something i like and dislike, wich makes the choice very difficult.
I love bad company 2 and have it on both PC and PS3 I'd say that nowadays the people who play it are mostly on pro level, but it is like that with every old FPS. Bad company 2 was flooded with noobs at one point too
what's the whole deal with the COD noobs thing i play TDM only and played COD since COD 2 and bf4 is my first battlefeild game and while it looks and sounds better there isn't much difference you still get 1-shot sniped across the map from a bush you still get called a faggot in chat and people still apam rockets and granades all the time it feels the same to me
***** Battlefield wasn't made for TDM what are you new? Wait... you are :DDD, Well upgrade to next-gen YOU'LL SEE WHAT BATTLEFIELD REALLY IS. Currently on consoles it's Current Gen:12v12 Manned matches, 30FPS, Ugly graphics Whereas Next Gen: 32v32 manned matches 60FPS, Gorgeous graphics.
Daniel Quinteros i am on next gen (sort of) i play on PC and my machine is almost as powerful as a next-gen console intel i7 wuadcore 3,4 mhz processor nvidia geforce gtx 770 graphics card 16 GB of kingston hyperX gaming RAM i can play on ultra settings without problems and you're right 64 playet TDM is kinda fun i just don't like conquest because everyone goes instantly to the big ''levolution'' and while the other team kills us 14 times over before we even have a point :)
Battlefield 4 is utter garbage the story sucks more than Minecraft and the gameplay is horrible... No weapon customization nor proper spawnpoints 90% of maps cost money I give ShitField 4 a 1/10
no mater which console you decide to play it on, I'd wait til at least the biggest gamebreaking bugs are gone before even considering buying the game. I've bought it, AND Premium, and I regret it at this point. Even tho I'm the biggest Battlefield fan. The game is not what they told us it was..
I bought the ps3 version on black Friday, and I put over 30 hours on Mp and I'm one of the lucky ones with no glitches or bugs and I had a freaking blast playing it. Then mid December I got a ps4 and even with the free upgrade I barely play it since I got my bf4 fix on ps3. Fun factor is key and it provided that on ps3 . Im saying I played it enough on ps3 to when I got It on ps4 my interest in the game declined. I don't jizz over graphics like a lot of people do.
I wouldn't bother with consoles just get it on the PC no point in consoles any more it's a dogfight at this point. Although wait till the bugs have been fixed.
SPOILERS It is because it is so broken. They don't expect you to go exploring so there are many parts that are not rendered. Like in the first level, if you decide to watch the army men with flashlights go through the door, You will see them merge through a wall. Or in the part where you go fight in a skyscraper at night. If you fall out of a window you will see that only the inside of the building is rendered. Or how about when you take a car from a civilian and he runs to the end of the world?
I have only played the Beta. Game is out the 1st of Nov here in Europe. But I'd recommend you to watch LevelCapGaming channel or RivalXfactor videos about BF4. These BF nerds go in-depth on the changes compared to BF3. Marine combat is back. So it changes the gameplay with a new zone of engagement. Commander mode is back, with powerful support abilities (strikes, ammo drops) Levolution significantly changes the flow of combat. Think of 2 maps in 1 play. Rebalanced classes, new gadgets new guns
The idea is to do a review as soon as a game can be bought; the point is to let people know how good the game is so they can choose whether or not to spend their money.
Watch the review on the Gamespot website if you want to get a better idea of how the game will look like on the next gen consoles, RUclips doesn't do it justice.
I think the multiplayer map design needs work. Some of the maps spawn vehicles way too quickly and I prefer playing as a support player. I can't always deal with vehicles since there's only C4.
BF-4 came out too soon and campaign is more like training for online multiplayer than actual story mode.There are still players who treasure campaigns over mindless multiplayer(no matter how fun).What I notice in CoD is work on campaigns and graphics aren't everything.Dice needs to make Bad Company,I see many gamers longing for that.
I think an 8.0 is fair, perhaps a LITTLE low but not unfair. because at the end of the day it is the same thing every 24 months, and AAA devs often do little to shake up a formula that works. Some people do by these games for single player only and the campaign is just as much a part of the game as the multiplayer. It may be better but it still has some of the inherit problems from BF3, and with the level of games that are due on next gen imo it stands up as a mp game but overall not so much
just recently, I been play battlefield 4 and was in the anti-air vehicle, will to my understand the AA is to shot down planes and helicopters, any airborne threats to my team and myself, the objective kill the enemy protect my teammates, and I was doing just that, and funny thing is that my own teammates start to attack me shot the AA from helicopters and tanks ramming the AA, dive bombing the AA destroying their jets in 5 or 6 games now, will you know what I did just kept shooting down the enemy, what the heck is going on?, there are more colorful words I can use to describe the situations, but I'll hold off on that, this is unacceptable behavior, lucky their not in the real army or the US WOULD BE IN A WORLD OF HURT, maybe they forgot how to play the game, needless to say most of those matches my team lost, another thing suicide jeeps, driving their jeeps onto a tank destroying the tank and driver but killing themselves in the process maybe their hoping when they get revived they will get 99 xp more, is that what we are learning from the Middle East?, and in incorporating it in our games, dose that sounds like fun for you? or is it that they get mad and cant score so what the heck. This game is about team work it's not about you there is no U in team, it's about us VS them playing the objective, and wining the round , it's hard enough fighting the enemy, but having to fight your own teammates in the process is outrageous and ridiculous, maybe someone should remind the of the fundamentals of the games, until next time this is LatinMike7 signing out
I'm not trying to be a fan boy, but I would really appreciate to know the reason for the score when there were not many bad items discussed (unless they mark down 2 pts for the campaign which is bogus). That and the score is to vague, there should have been (while a little to much) separate reviews for each version.
Sure fun is the whole point of it, but there are many different ways in which a game can be fun. Challenge, awe, or sadness can also factor into the mix. Limbo and Journey were a lot of fun btw, have you even played them?
While this review is more fair than IGN's, an 8.0 is simply ridiculous for this game. It is incredibly detailed, beautiful, dynamic, and well designed. And it IS the best Battlefield ever made. It deserves at least a 9. Seriously people.
1. You said that they repeat each other from there last game . that means each cod game has the same story. 2. they may have amazing multiplayer but without a good campaign and co-op mode the game it is not a complete game and IW and 3arc invest time in all aspects of the game. 3. COD is not the same game every year, multiple endings were not in MW3, zombies were not in COD4, extinctions is not in BO2.
back in 90s games still had depth.,..people would relax during games and won't do multitasking with there iphones and Facebook. inlate 90s games got even better..after 2004 there was a improvement in graphics but story telling still remains challenge.
That's precisely what Mark Rubin meant when he said that CoD players aren't gamers. That caused a huge ruckus over the internet but if you think about that sentence, you'll realize that he is right. Some CoD players don't even know what a role playing game is. They don't know the difference between microsoft and sony. All they do is play maybe half an hour of call of duty a week, and that's it. Would you call them gamers? No, technically, they are not. They are more like "callofdutyers" :-D
I love how channels like gamespot critique a game while still giving it credit where it's due. Not just hating on the game or vice versa.
+Bioshock Is Dead Yeah, as a fan of both Call of Duty and Battlefield, I really enjoyed BF4. As well, as BF 1.
Now i kinda regret buying hardline
I already did
yeaa as BF hardline a new IP for me....id rather 4 any day
Why label the game footage 1080p then upload a 720p video... it makes no sense... Also... Are you sure the Xbox 360 is native 1080p or did you mess up on the editing as well as the render?
One of the best PC games :D To bad it had such a horrible start but now it rocks and surpasses Ghosts and AW with ease.
So.... Gamespot.... You enjoying Activision's money? There is no way Battlefield and Cod: Ghosts are tied, just sayin....
Indeed. CoD Ghosts was simply horrible.
they even fking said that graphics are tied WHAT A FKING JOKE.... THAT is the simply one aspect you cant even argue about BF4 has far more superior visuals.
no it wasn't
I always wonder if the people making these dumb comments a decade ago grew as people and realize how dumb they are now lol. Especially given how horrific Battlefield 4’s launch was, and how bad the campaign turned out to be.
i heard its up scaled to 1080p
Call of Duty Ghosts Campaign + Battlefield 4 Multiplayer= Best FPS ever
Dice and Treyarch should work together! :D MOST AWESOME GAME EVER!
Mr.Rangz0r I agree!
I hated CoD Ghosts Campaign and Multiplayer, same with BF4.
MasterHoovyX Well, why are you even watching a BF video then?
MrNosec I enjoy watching BF, just not playing it. It's like watching a video about a lamborghini, I am not going to buy since I watched a video of it.
wow. how the fuck could they possibly think that bf4 runs in 1080p on the xbox 360? wtf
0:36 COD fanboys jaws hit the floor!
I bet you play warzone now lol
@@jaylenjames364 Lol
Guys this is going for $9.89 on ps4 right now to may 10, great deal
Same with Xbox
yea ima get it can I purchase it now and download after may 10
+jskuxx ghee yeah u can man
Sweet lol
Crap I wish I saw this earlier. I just bought it today for $29.99 :( at least 4 of the dlc was free
Sounds like a fucking press release than a review.
Bloody hate the new controls compared to BF3. Like why the fuck do you bail the vehicle on the same button as you reload with?!
***** Im so bloody sick of this community. BF4 is the most dissapointing game i have ever bought.
Ever heard of Control Settings?
***** SHIT NOT YOU AGAIN LOL
Saif Sultan sup
***** i don't think he has
Might get get bf4 tommorow first game in the series it is better then ghosts or should I get ghosts?
BF4 is better if you like Tanks, Helis and Jets Ghosts is always the same in bf4 you have big maps, small maps, jungle, city etc
If your planning to play ghosts on a pc then dont get ghosts for pc unless you can deal with the lag or untill the lag stops I would recommend if your gonna get ghosts now get it on a console because on a pc its very laggy even for the highest end graphics cards so I would hold on untill a patch comes out for the pc to buy ghosts on a pc but battlefield 4 looks epic to me sense i've been playing cod sense COD 4 this game really impresses me and I might pick it up myself but it all depends if you like Better graphics, More players on maps or vehicles. Also keep in mind that if you like more strategic gameplay you should go to battlefield im not saying that COD doesnt involve strategy it has alot to it but battlefield has a bit more realistic strategic gameplay when it comes down to it and COD is a fast pace arcade shooter it wont be as realistic or has as good of graphics as battlefield but the fast pace gameplay and fun make up for it but its up to your taste Fast pace arcade shooter or Realistic, Strategic gameplay its your choice personally I love both and I think there both great games to play
Hope this helps
~TheMotionNInja :D
If you buy cod you will lose 100% your money.
Buy BF4. Its awesome and beautifull.
Look its your personal idea COD and Battlefield are both amazing dont listen to this guy get the experience you want :D
as a former cod fan I can say ghosts is an unforgiveable piece of shit.
bf4 on ps4 or PC is a smarter purchase
exactly how epic it is when you see 10 enemies running towards you at one time while you get the hell out of there with the other team shooting the shit out of you and you either die epic with a rambo spray or manage to get out of there and detonate a disaster load of C4. It's the only game that gets my adrenaline pumping and it's insane. You cannot compare . You will never get an experience like this in Cod, running around through small corridors injecting adrenaline and killing with no recoil
Campaign is short and the story line is hard to follow, not been impressed at all, hopping the mutiplayer is a lot better
MP is best out there. Campaign wasnt that great but BF is all about MP
WARLORD Wouldn't say best.
I got bored of the campaign, I bought it for the multiplayer anyway
Dice should make the single player game as a sand box war game for training you of how to play the game. The more you learn and lvl your solider in "Boot camp" the better and more varies weapons you can use in the Multi-player game. The Multi-player game would be like deployment of your solider to complete the objective just like in real life. Am i the only gamer who thinks this could help a story mode problem???You cant have a sniper rifle if you've not trained with it and reached some lvl of expertise with it. I think it would be a blast to have to work your way up in single player to get the bounces in multi-player.
Expected a higher score after hearing all that
Oh, I may be wrong.. I was reading an article on IGN about how CoD Ghosts will run on native 1080p on PS4 and 720p on Xbone. Idk, it may have just been a rumor.
But is BF4 good on the PS4?
Matthew Lowe Nope
Yes....It's a game not real life. Dont put the game on such a high pedistool
Matthew Lowe yes
+Becoming “The Unlord” Godsize No it looks almost the same for me....
I've seen this get an 8-9.5 which is pretty fair. I would give this an 8.5 simply because of the campaign, it's like walking around with a broken foot and the campaign is this game's broken foot. They really tried with the campaign this time but unless the ultimate goal was to be a first-person narrative then what we got with single player was expected. The game looks and plays amazingly and I will be throwing countless hours into this game's multiplayer, just like the previous installment.
Do people still play Sonic on Mega Drive 1? I got one today and wanna go online
Lmao 😂
Bro do you have Pokemon red for the gameboy? I wanna trade Pokemon's in person
BF4 is basically the basic concept of BF(team-based all out war with vehicles), the Commander mode of BF2, the increased destruction of BFBC2, the visual flair of BF3, with the concept of Leveloution. Not to mention it has balanced classes.
BF4 = Absolutely epic!!!!
doesnt even come close to 3
How? There are easily 100 listable ways BF4 has improved over BF3 which I didn't think was possible, but they out did themselves at Dice. Only 1 thing I can think of that made BF3 better was being able to squad up PRIOR to joing a game and taking away that ability was an epic failure at Dice
***** I hate to argue here but give me the 100 listable ways they've improved it and I'll believe you.
Ratsass LOOL I also think BF4 is an improvement over BF3. BF4 is like a combination of BF2, BC2, and BF3. BF3 has way too little destruction aspects for my taste.
BF3 was in production for 6 years.. they released BF4 what.. a year and a half later ? Its using the same engine as BF3 with slight improvements.. its like a BF3 update.. rushed crap nobody needs...
It likely means upscaled to 1080p. Which means nothing.
It seems that xbone is 720p (by 1280) and the ps4 is at 900p (by 1600). Both strive for 60fps.
The only reason games like these don't get better scores is because the campaigns are a waste of space. It's a multiplayer-centric shooter and shouldn't have a campaign
Though it sounds strange, Call of Duty campaigns are just, well, good. They're fun. The simplistic shooting makes it a blast to kill AI. The gunplay here works better in multiplayer, which is why the campaign's a little drier.
Andrew Zinner I think BF should just make multiplayer & leave campaign alone. I can never make it thru a BF campaign without falling asleep
X360 and PS3 are current gen? They are like ten gens in past! They use hardware from almost ten years ago that could be shrunk into your tablet nowadays and software that is 14 years old! (actually, there are more powerful gaming tablets than PS3 and X360, like Razer Edge)
Alright:
MP: Amazing
SP: Good
How come nobody mentions all the game breaking bugs it use to had?
Mehran Rahman they are paid by ea
still has them
it's for 5$ but should I get premium instead for 60?
i would say get it for 5 thats what i did plus there free dlc right now and if you what the maps buy them seprate im sure you don't want all the maps and if you do buy the premium
+SupremeMystique it's not free anymore
What's that thing in the upper right corner? PS4 can't handle BF4 on 1080p neither can the 360.
The campaign is awesome, so underrated!
Not really
It’s 2019, and literally right now it’s on sale for $3.99! I copped it forsure 👍🏼
2021 Free and servers crowded
Well it's going for Xbox one on the store for $4.50
Right now tell the end of June
On ps4 for 4.78 ends today but I already got it
it's still 4.78 PS4
It's still 4.50$ on Xbox, does a lot of people still play it?
around 15.000 player on pc, 13500 on xo1,24000 player on ps 4
Do I really need to see a BF4 ad before the actual review?
8.0 is a low score in my eyes, deserved a 9.5 for sure. There is nothing out there like Battlefield 4, except other Battlefields.
don't get me wrong... bf4 is a solid game which i have played for about 300hours... BUT concidering that this score was set at release... it is waaaaaay to high! the singleplayer is utter shit and the multiplayer at this point in time was literally unplayable... i would have given 1/10 and would have warned anyone interessted to heavily consider whether a game in this stage is even worth a try!
today after all those patches i think 8/10 would suffice because i personaly think that bf4 has some of the worst maps in the franchise and since maps are pretty important in multiplayer games i would argue that bf4 is the second worst battlefield yet... closely behind bf1... i'd prefer hardline over both of those every day
You can't penalise a game for it's community. Especially for the community of another game coming over. I have played all of the battlefields and I'm all about the teamwork. You get a much higher score for teamwork, the game rewards you for playing as a team and supporting each other.
"Well designed maps.." LMAO
Tris Two words: Operation Locker.
They made it very clear there is an embargo for xbox one games for now. The xbox one version review will come a little later. Take that as you will.
whats next Battlefield 1944 or 1945 anyone?
Damn it
I sure hope so, Battlefield 4 runs very smooth now in PS4 compared to launch so i am hoping its something of the WWII or Vietnam Era. It would be very refreshing to see that than a modern take.
+payz hayz is bf4 a recommended game?
Dafa Pradana
Since all the patches and a lot fixes for the PS4 version go for it. But get it at a reasonable price.
+griz312 1 apparently
But was the story good? It has too many plot holes and you can't have a good ending (or endings) without a good story. With that being said, Blops2 campaign is an improvement over MW3.
Fuck the new youtube comment system!
Holy shit, guys I want to make sure I'm not misunderstanding but at 20 seconds where it says PS4 @ 1080, does that mean the PS4 is running at 1080p?
Is BF4 Better Then COD Ghosts
Yes
Meh
+Gamer Brownie3 Way better.
+Just BringIt hahahahaha :')
Depends
What platform are you playing on?
This got the same score as ghosts... what is this world coming to. once we have call of duty world at war 56 and battlefield bad company 24 the cod game will score higher.
I looked it up and it only got the same score from critics. But the score from users has a big difference. ghosts had a much lower score than Battlefield4
I guess that I looked at only a few that all got this score
CupcakesDeluxe
But the problem is that most user scores for cod:ghosts are from cod haters/bf fanboys. You can tell because on metacritic, most negative user reviews give the game a 0 or 1. Lets be honest, call of duty isnt that terrible. Most games should never receive a score that low. For example, "corodriguez" gave ghosts a zero because he hates how activison is releasing a cod every year. "XenoUltra12" gave the game a 2 because the ending wasnt good.
Overreacting much?
yeah ik
Cod ghost: we got dynamic maps. (Bus falls of cliff)
Battlefield 4: bitch please (huge ass building collapses)
When a game has the same title but a different number expect essentially the same game with some upgrades. When a game has a different title expect a different game.
Call of Duty Ghosts is a reboot of Call of Duty. Battlefield 4 is another Battlefield. How much change each title should have respectively is based on what type of iteration they are.
Everything you said was agreeable aside from the fact that you said
"no one buys the game for its single player alone.why no higher score?"
The single player MUST affect the verdict because it is a full priced 60 dollars game. It does not matter if you play the multiplayer alone (like me) it still affects the score
Battlefield 4 looks like a reskin of Battlefield 3.
Newer than Cod
Mr. Hakim™ OMG! You mentioned how this is better than COD! I am so shocked! WOW!!! Seriously, give me a fucking break. A game being older or better than COD is NOT a selling point. And EA is a bigger moneywhore then Activision. Either that, or both are on par when it comes to moneywhoring.
I dont know about that, but i prefer the free stuff that EA gives every once in a while, unlike Activition that everything is micro DLC but thats just my opinion...
+Omar Jalloh wow. You butthurt?
Mr. Hakim™ *cough* Star Wars Battlefront 3.
Doesn't really matter if you have a TV that supports 1080i when the native resolution is 720p.
what the hell did i just watch? it's the same bloody game for christ sake, look at the vide! LOOK AT IT, it's a copy, how can people not see that?! you failed me Dice, not a game i will buy
What are you talking about? It looks way freaking different than the last game, and its called "Battlefield", it gives everything you wan't, and with bigger maps. Was you expecting a Zombie mode, giant mechs and shit like that?
No i was expecting something different, we already have BF3. Come up with NEW idea, it's a new game. New game doesn't mean add more stuff to the old one, it means make a NEW battlefield. ive seen so many people complaining that games like COD never changes, then what is happening right here. new time settings, new enemies, new IDEAS
***** But it is a new Battlefield, and it had changed a lot since 2002, gameplay had always been fun, and addicting. Why try fixing something, that isn't broken to begin with, its best just to add more gameplay elements, than to completely change, and destroying the entire franchise. CoD could use a change, but BF is perfect how it is.
Are you living under a rock? Battlefield 4 is changed a lot since bf 3. What where you expecting? A fucking mmo?
Hunter Lee there is flaws with battlefield that COD is doing right, like the 60 fps fast paced combat. if only that were added to a battlefield game, with all the players, those huge maps, and all that, it would (for me) be the perfect FPS. but both games has something i like and dislike, wich makes the choice very difficult.
Is this still worth getting on old gen consoles?
well it depends if you care about graphics and non bugs/crushes.
Just get it on the system it is build for PC.
Bad Company 2 is still the best Battlefield. After that, it was flooded with CoD noobs.
I love bad company 2 and have it on both PC and PS3 I'd say that nowadays the people who play it are mostly on pro level, but it is like that with every old FPS. Bad company 2 was flooded with noobs at one point too
what's the whole deal with the COD noobs thing
i play TDM only and played COD since COD 2 and bf4 is my first battlefeild game and while it looks and sounds better there isn't much difference
you still get 1-shot sniped across the map from a bush you still get called a faggot in chat and people still apam rockets and granades all the time
it feels the same to me
CoD people usually don't know what the objectives are, suck at flying vehicles. But whatever, they can learn :p
***** Battlefield wasn't made for TDM what are you new? Wait... you are :DDD, Well upgrade to next-gen YOU'LL SEE WHAT BATTLEFIELD REALLY IS. Currently on consoles it's
Current Gen:12v12 Manned matches, 30FPS, Ugly graphics
Whereas Next Gen: 32v32 manned matches 60FPS, Gorgeous graphics.
Daniel Quinteros i am on next gen (sort of) i play on PC and my machine is almost as powerful as a next-gen console
intel i7 wuadcore 3,4 mhz processor
nvidia geforce gtx 770 graphics card
16 GB of kingston hyperX gaming RAM
i can play on ultra settings without problems and you're right 64 playet TDM is kinda fun i just don't like conquest because everyone goes instantly to the big ''levolution'' and while the other team kills us 14 times over before we even have a point :)
So we know the ps4 runs at 1080p now. Im sure the xbox 360 is a mistake it said 1080p for that too?
Battlefield 4 is utter garbage the story sucks more than Minecraft and the gameplay is horrible... No weapon customization nor proper spawnpoints 90% of maps cost money I give ShitField 4 a 1/10
cod noob
Call of duty sucks, lmao have you seen the dab and Nae Nae in bo3. Battlefield is a man's game
keanpepe Jeez I guess I have to delete my comment... It seems like peopole cant take sarcasm... I mean who the F likes CoD
+Homo Erectus agreed
nope
Your not wrong at all. I think the same way but if your feeling stressed out on mp, go to sp and kick ass. For me that's the resin for sp.
This game is shit.
The*
Nelson Griggs No.
Yes.
I love you.
Jackson your right that game sucks.
Should I buy this game now on PS3 or wait maybe a couple months until I get a PS4 and buy it then for PS4?
Wait till you get a PS4 trust me battlefield 4 on the PS3 is shit.
no mater which console you decide to play it on, I'd wait til at least the biggest gamebreaking bugs are gone before even considering buying the game. I've bought it, AND Premium, and I regret it at this point. Even tho I'm the biggest Battlefield fan. The game is not what they told us it was..
I bought the ps3 version on black Friday, and I put over 30 hours on Mp and I'm one of the lucky ones with no glitches or bugs and I had a freaking blast playing it. Then mid December I got a ps4 and even with the free upgrade I barely play it since I got my bf4 fix on ps3. Fun factor is key and it provided that on ps3 . Im saying I played it enough on ps3 to when I got It on ps4 my interest in the game declined. I don't jizz over graphics like a lot of people do.
I wouldn't bother with consoles just get it on the PC no point in consoles any more it's a dogfight at this point. Although wait till the bugs have been fixed.
Ratsass LOOL Nah I don't really play games on my PC but thanks for the comment. I'll wait a while
because the only difference on the xbone one is that you will be able to 'pin' and watch price is right while playing BF4
Chris Watters is pretty much the only decent Gamespot reviewer left
i'm getting both BF4 and CoD but lot's of people can't because they have other costs and can't or won't spent too much on games
The Next Gen versions won't come out until their release dates.
PS4: November 15, 2013
Xbox One: November 22, 2013
It feels really different from 3. It's not such a change as BC2 to BF3, but it's enough to still feel new.
SPOILERS It is because it is so broken. They don't expect you to go exploring so there are many parts that are not rendered. Like in the first level, if you decide to watch the army men with flashlights go through the door, You will see them merge through a wall. Or in the part where you go fight in a skyscraper at night. If you fall out of a window you will see that only the inside of the building is rendered. Or how about when you take a car from a civilian and he runs to the end of the world?
no, it means is running at 900p, recorded at 1080p
I have only played the Beta. Game is out the 1st of Nov here in Europe. But I'd recommend you to watch LevelCapGaming channel or RivalXfactor videos about BF4. These BF nerds go in-depth on the changes compared to BF3.
Marine combat is back. So it changes the gameplay with a new zone of engagement.
Commander mode is back, with powerful support abilities (strikes, ammo drops)
Levolution significantly changes the flow of combat. Think of 2 maps in 1 play.
Rebalanced classes, new gadgets new guns
The idea is to do a review as soon as a game can be bought; the point is to let people know how good the game is so they can choose whether or not to spend their money.
i suppose you've got the 780m card?
Update your drivers.
I ran BF3 on Ultra at 1080p at 60FPS and I can run BF4 on High at 1080p at 60FPS.
660ti here.
i think that why bf4 gets a score that is so unexpected is because bf3 was such a huge step up from its successor.
Watch the review on the Gamespot website if you want to get a better idea of how the game will look like on the next gen consoles, RUclips doesn't do it justice.
I think the multiplayer map design needs work. Some of the maps spawn vehicles way too quickly and I prefer playing as a support player. I can't always deal with vehicles since there's only C4.
Custom server settings.
it's prob the admin setting he may make car spawn rate faster
BF-4 came out too soon and campaign is more like training for online multiplayer than actual story mode.There are still players who treasure campaigns over mindless multiplayer(no matter how fun).What I notice in CoD is work on campaigns and graphics aren't everything.Dice needs to make Bad Company,I see many gamers longing for that.
The 'Call' has sent me 'Off' on my 'Duty' to play Battlefield 4.
FYI
both consoles are upscaled to 1080p
PC is the real 1080p,2K and 4K
1080p gameplay, youtube video only 720p. WTF!
5:05 who noticed the t-rex?! I smiled so much!
I think an 8.0 is fair, perhaps a LITTLE low but not unfair. because at the end of the day it is the same thing every 24 months, and AAA devs often do little to shake up a formula that works. Some people do by these games for single player only and the campaign is just as much a part of the game as the multiplayer. It may be better but it still has some of the inherit problems from BF3, and with the level of games that are due on next gen imo it stands up as a mp game but overall not so much
just recently, I been play battlefield 4 and was in the anti-air vehicle, will to my understand the AA is to shot down planes and helicopters, any airborne threats to my team and myself, the objective kill the enemy protect my teammates, and I was doing just that, and funny thing is that my own teammates start to attack me shot the AA from helicopters and tanks ramming the AA, dive bombing the AA destroying their jets in 5 or 6 games now, will you know what I did just kept shooting down the enemy, what the heck is going on?, there are more colorful words I can use to describe the situations, but I'll hold off on that, this is unacceptable behavior, lucky their not in the real army or the US WOULD BE IN A WORLD OF HURT, maybe they forgot how to play the game, needless to say most of those matches my team lost, another thing suicide jeeps, driving their jeeps onto a tank destroying the tank and driver but killing themselves in the process maybe their hoping when they get revived they will get 99 xp more, is that what we are learning from the Middle East?, and in incorporating it in our games, dose that sounds like fun for you? or is it that they get mad and cant score so what the heck. This game is about team work it's not about you there is no U in team, it's about us VS them playing the objective, and wining the round , it's hard enough fighting the enemy, but having to fight your own teammates in the process is outrageous and ridiculous, maybe someone should remind the of the fundamentals of the games, until next time this is LatinMike7 signing out
latinmike7 i completely agree with me and my buddy use the attack choppers and we get jet rammed nonstop because they cant kill us otherwise
latinmike7 chill its battlefield,its normal,if you want a super-realistic army game play ARMA 2 or 3 (those are the best ones in my opinion)
dude, I wrote that months ago, it all good
The "lack" of blue in this battlefield is refreshing
lol at the mini t-rex hanging from car when they about hit the people.
Do any of you people saying 9/10 ACTUALLY own Battlefield 4 yet? Or are you judging on the beta?
True.
A good reviewer never gives 9s and 10s to games that doesn't try to stand out.
how do they review it if its not out yet?
Forgot to mention the fact that it's unplayable half the time due to technical issues like crashes.
x360 was 1080p? and ps3 at 720p wonder how they got that high resolution on the hardware
I'm not trying to be a fan boy, but I would really appreciate to know the reason for the score when there were not many bad items discussed (unless they mark down 2 pts for the campaign which is bogus). That and the score is to vague, there should have been (while a little to much) separate reviews for each version.
With the driving section at 5:08, a guy ran into the middle of the street and phased through the car for me. Still decent for £3.99 on PS4.
Do people still play this game on Xbox One?
+Jack Smith yes I recently bought it many servers still get full games
Xbox One has a average of 40,000 people and PS4 has an avarage of 44,000 every day
Do ppl still play
Sure fun is the whole point of it, but there are many different ways in which a game can be fun. Challenge, awe, or sadness can also factor into the mix. Limbo and Journey were a lot of fun btw, have you even played them?
While this review is more fair than IGN's, an 8.0 is simply ridiculous for this game. It is incredibly detailed, beautiful, dynamic, and well designed. And it IS the best Battlefield ever made. It deserves at least a 9. Seriously people.
1. You said that they repeat each other from there last game . that means each cod game has the same story.
2. they may have amazing multiplayer but without a good campaign and co-op mode the game it is not a complete game and IW and 3arc invest time in all aspects of the game.
3. COD is not the same game every year, multiple endings were not in MW3, zombies were not in COD4, extinctions is not in BO2.
did anyone else saw the battlefield 4 ad b4 watching this?
back in 90s games still had depth.,..people would relax during games and won't do multitasking with there iphones and Facebook. inlate 90s games got even better..after 2004 there was a improvement in graphics but story telling still remains challenge.
I bought the beta for 50 bucks. Will I get the full game for free? When does the full game come out??
Unfortunately, no, you'll have to pay another $50 for the full game, which I believe is also going to have a different name, "Battlefield 5"
Yes it would as there's nothing to hold it back, plus then it would allow for more space to have more maps
That's precisely what Mark Rubin meant when he said that CoD players aren't gamers. That caused a huge ruckus over the internet but if you think about that sentence, you'll realize that he is right. Some CoD players don't even know what a role playing game is. They don't know the difference between microsoft and sony. All they do is play maybe half an hour of call of duty a week, and that's it. Would you call them gamers? No, technically, they are not. They are more like "callofdutyers" :-D
Perhaps some games need improvement while others are fine as they are.
wait, bf 4 on the xbox 360 supports 1080 while the ps3 version only supports 720 ?
Really nice review thanks Chris Gamespot and the production team you guys really do put out outstanding content :)
@@ayushparashar4040 Feels great thanks. Cheers