Marshall WoburnIII VS JBL Authentics500 | JBL killed it? | Check it out now!!!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 20 дек 2023
- Marshall Woburn III VS JBL Authentics 500 | JBL killed it? | Check it out now!!!
#marshall #woburn #jbl #authentics #bestspeakers #basstest #bluetoothspeakerreview #soundtest #uaelife #compared
If you are tired of watching and reading paid review videos/blogs that leaves you even more confused and you can't decide what product is right for you then you must watch my videos, where I will be comparing Audio products from customer's point of view, no technical terms just simple and easy to understand and no paid reviews, simply "COMPARED".
I own a Woburn 3 and its sounds heaven to me, JBL have 3 tweeters which give a more detailed high.
New gen chose bass
Audiophile always chose details in sound
Marshall provides more detailed sound
Jbl i thing they always with more bass
We are waiting your decision, wich one is better?
In my opinion, Authentics 500 is better in all aspects.
Jbl is louder but harsh. Marshall has a warmer sound.
Marshall 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
You can definitely tell the differences between the two units . While the Marshall sounds good- it seems to run
Flat , more focused on the upper highs . The JBL. Is a
Wolf in sheep’s clothing. It’s an absolute beast. Having
The highs was about 5% louder and the bass seem so
Hover around 32-38 Hz . At 60 %. I was hearing some
Compression from JBL . Bass heavy music the JBL
Runs out of steam and Marshall wasn’t any better maybe 5% gain in volume .
Вы ведь понимаете,что это разные весовые категории?
С этими настройками эквалайзера Маршалл отыгрывает рок великолепно,но в то же время я слышу,как jbl производит атмосферные низкие частоты в хип-хопе.
По моему мнению,здесь стОило бы быть authentics 300
jbl beast
The static his is horrible
Marshall frequency response is better and has more bass extention. You just say jbl is better cause "boum boum" effect but the bass extension is not the best between the two and the sound clarity and définition is far better on the Marshall.
Did you compare them in person or you base your opinion on this video?
@@BackyardCed I'm a pro musician and I have experience in pro recording studios. I have very good DAC and headphones to ear every subtiliy of the audio. And if you read the caracteristics of every model, you will see that the Marshall bass extension is better. That's the official numbers...and numbers can't lie ! My ears can't either
@@emmanuelgirard1656
Thanks for the reply :)
It’s seems to me that the JBL is more of a hip hop/ bass oriented type of music system. Not the type of music I’m into. I’d be curious to play some Blue Notes live recordings on both systems and see what I’d prefer
@@BackyardCed nothing remplace a test in real conditions, for shure ! But with a good DAC and headphones, you can ear the sound signature of every monitor. The JBL are more rnb or electronic music oriented ! If you listen variety, pop, rock, jazz etc... the Marshall is the way to go !
Jbl is far better than marshall
Exactly. Marshall is overpriced. I brought one for 200. The sound was flat. M eu boom that cost 100 was way better. I took it back to the store.
Jbl is 270 watts woburn is only 150
And they cost the same wtf
And i have 35 watt speakers that will blow both of them out the window....
@@janiss2926 I don't think so brother
@@bambomango9427 well they are also about 4 times the size and weight ;) - just accenting how people get hung up on numbers, depends how the power is being measured. Same speakers (4 of them at the same time @8ohm each) also run comfortably from a 40+ year old 35w per channel amp, switching to a 700watt d class pro amp didnt get them to run louder, just the highs and mids became cleaner - at peak levels atleast, but bass flatter yet more tightly controlled.