Most of the comment section is just Arguing about who should win and going so political. It’s just a Simulation and anything could happen in wars which won’t make sense in real life but could happen. So just chill it’s a game nothing here is real
@@Darkseidsolosfiction Yes, I know that. In the United States, the majority of people now know this and respect France except fools. I see that it is the other Europeans who continue to do French Bashing and I find it stupid. Maybe they are jealous of the country's history.
Eugen ne veut pas mettre de leclerc dans warno car selon eux il n'était pas au point dans les années 1980 (ajouter le ka 50 ne les dérange pas cependant), en espérant que des mods permettront d'amener warno à l'ère moderne
Alors ben sûr, il faut prendre en compte que ceci est une simulation et que la situation serait totalement différente dans la vraie vie, on ne dirait pas comme ça, mais une bataille France contre USSR pourrait durée extrêmement longtemps, car ce qui est mal fait dans cette simulation, c'est que les sols sont clairement sans pitié pour aller conquérir un territoire qu'ils soient solos ou à plusieurs, il y a quand même une stratégie à aborder avant de foncer tête baisser sur un point de capture, que ça soit des chars armored ou light aussi laisser un seul char au front tout seul personne ne ferait ça il y aura forcément un soutien aérien ou terrestre que ça soit au niveau de l'infanterie ou de la technologie, malgré le fait que la carte peu être une carte réaliste 90% des combats ne se feront jamais sur une plaine à découvert sans villes ou arbre à proximité, la plaine, c'est le pire biome dans une bataille ouverte et terrestre. Pour faire simple, sur le niveau que pourrait mener une telle bataille entre ces deux blocs de puissance, USSR aurait gagné, c'est sûr, mais avec un handicap extrêmement élevé, une perte d'homme colossal et une technologie très vieillissante, car généralement l'USSR met tout dans la quantité que dans la qualité dans n'importe quel domaine technologique, met par contre la France, elle aurait gagné l'aspect technique de la guerre quand il s'agit du coût de main d'œuvre, de la coordination de troupes et l'expérience dans un domaine à temps, j'imagine standard vu la carte et très européen de campagne ce genre de conflit pourrait mettre les deux camps extrêmement mal, mais les dégâts se jouerai plus en faveur des USSR car qui dit beaucoup de monde dit plus de chance de mourir vite, c'est pour ça que le nombre ne fait pas la force d'une armée
Думаю очевидно, что ссср легко бы победил францию, но в реальности суть в том, что чтобы добраться до франции нужно было одалеть западную германию, где были бы расположенны силы нато.
J ai analyser la partie j ai trouvé un truc louche quand a la fin de la partie l offensive français avec commencer beaucoup trop tard pas eu assez de temps pour un effet sur la partie puis ensuite on a pas vues une seule fois les lance missile français ni les Cesaer et l aviation on a vues au debut met apres plus rien en plus jai pas dit russe prq il y a des chats des anné 50 et des chard des anné 80 et des camion français disparait ??
@@Someone111ify our Republic is not going to make us victorious (and since our country goes destroyed). It's the baddest thing we got ever. So yes, a lot of french people prefer monarch like the Bourbon dynastie or best, Bonaparte one.
В сингл плейр заходишь ставишь двух ботов по разные стороны и сам занимаешь какуе то сторону. До окончания боя просто стой в афк чтобы боты сами сражались. Потом на повторе смотрешь за боем, как автор ролика.
@@AdélaïdeFrance Moscow visit Napoleon 1815 Battle of Waterloo, Today Ukraine can’t even hit Russian Artillery’s 😂 Ukraine Lost 4-8million civilians, Their Front is Collapsing,Ukraine Didn’t Advanced Pr take back its cities or farms Since Summer 2023 and Then your telling Ukraine is stronger? What a Joke
@@luritual7390 Moscow visited Napoleon? Do you mean rather that Moscow helped by British money, the British army, the Prussian, German, Austrian, Italian, Spanish armies? Why Russia must always need its allies 😂. France won at Austerlitz in 1v2 against Russia and at Friedland in 1v1, Berezina 1v1, France won too. But if the allies are there it's simpler 😂. And the same for Waterloo. It only takes several people to defeat France😂. Bro, Russia lost in Crimea in 1853, lost to JAPAN in 1905, lost in 1916 and in 1920 to Poland 😂
@@AdélaïdeFrance Beause it’s fighting the whole fcking continental Supplies of Military Aid, Telling Russia will be Pushback to Moscow and Retake Crimea in late 2022-2023, fighting with shovels and washing machines tech. Ukraine falling Military and Population decline its taking a tole😂😂🤣
R.I.P moi qui est françai 😢 mais je suis pour les deux car vous les américains vous nous avez aidé a libérer la France des mains des allemands pendant la seconde guerre mondiale 😔🤗❤❤❤❤
Oui l'histoire est écrite par les vainqueurs. Mais n'oubliez jamais qui a bombardé nos villes normandes jusqu'à la destruction totale pour aucune raison stratégique ou tactique. N'oubliez pas que les américains ne voulaient pas nous mettre sur le banc des vainqueurs et que cela n'a été possible uniquement par la pression de Staline. N'oubliez pas non plus que sans la catastrophique opération Barbarossa l'armée allemande aurait eu tout le loisir de renvoyer les alliés à la flotte. Les français ont libérés la France. La 2eme DB, les résistants, les soldats Kieffer ...
Russia fights with modern weapons and not those made in the USSR. and Ukraine can't win with Abrams and other crap from 40+ NATO countries. Now imagine what will happen if France alone fights against Russia
@@fyurerys It has been shown that at the start of the conflict Russia fought with old Soviet weapons. The Western aid excuse is pitiful. Ukraine won the Battle of kyiv at the start of the conflict without any help and today Russia is helped by China, Iran and North Korea. 2 years to take a small territory from Ukraine, a real shame. If Russia were to fight NATO or just France, it would be defeated quickly.
@@fyurerys Ukraine can't win? However, if the war is not over, that means that Ukraine has not lost. And a country like that against Russia, holding out for two years, maybe three next year, is half a victory. Not to mention that NATO is strengthened and the Europeans are rearming. So it is a political defeat for Russia.
Russia made a lot of mistakes at the beginning! But not now! The entire Western world is helping Ukraine with weapons and money! NATO specialists trained their military before the war! In Ukraine, besides Ukrainians, there are mercenaries! Ukraine itself is under constant mobilization! In fact, the Russian army has been in the minority since the first days of the war! Only 150-190 thousand troops they invaded while in 2003 the USA invaded Iraq with one and a half million troops!The old weapons were used mainly by militias from the DPR Before the war, Ukraine itself had a well-armed army! Ukraine inherited a huge number of different arsenals from the USSR, which made it stronger than the post-Soviet countries after Russia!In fact, Ukraine is stronger than France! Because they are really fighting! Russia is also faced with a regular army that has armored vehicles, aviation and artillery, plus support from NATO! Russia only uses a limited number of troops because for them this is a military operation! Are you even aware that Russia does not use all of its arsenal? If you try to invade Russia itself, how many days will you last? We also see that Russia is fighting against the army and not against civilians! We saw Israel fight! If the Russians didn’t care about civilians, then Kyiv flared up long ago! At that time, France or even the United States were fighting against a crowd of shepherds who did not even have normal armored vehicles, not to mention drone aircraft and artillery!Russia also effectively destroyed the shepherds in Syria, if you remember! Don’t even take into account the fact that at what cost the Ukrainians are fighting! Also, don’t take into account the fact that the war in Ukraine changes the doctrine and proves that there is no quick victory in modern warfare! Even the Americans do not have such an opportunity at the moment against Iran! Because a well-funded army can repel any aggressor! In general, in this video it’s the USSR! This is another country, another army! In the 80s the French had no chance against the USSR
don't forget that it was the Russian winter that saved you twice, first from Napoleon and then from the mustachioed without this winter getting your butt kicked.
@@ВикторТокарев-з2з France crushed you in all wars and often France alone against everyone, you were in alliances against France with the Austrians and the Prussians and the English ,...and the French crushed you like flies. And last time the Berezina, the French crushed you in all the battles up to Moscow and you were forced to burn Moscow and flee until winter... and Berizena is in Belarus not in Russia, so with you there were the Belarusians and the Ukrainians with you against France ... Not to mention that the majority of Napoleon's army was at war in Spain so shut up. Today ukraine will crush you alone🤣 .
Most of the comment section is just Arguing about who should win and going so political. It’s just a Simulation and anything could happen in wars which won’t make sense in real life but could happen. So just chill it’s a game nothing here is real
I agree. The day a battle like that exist mean it's WW3 and everyone will be losing something.
in this game pilots are playing on HARD level while others on easy
French-Bashing here
As an American, I agree. The French army is a very good army. Too underestimated
@@Lynndie-2003 France has won most battles but just because it capitulated in WW2 everyone thinks they are weak
@@Darkseidsolosfiction Yes, I know that. In the United States, the majority of people now know this and respect France except fools. I see that it is the other Europeans who continue to do French Bashing and I find it stupid. Maybe they are jealous of the country's history.
thats the soviet union buddy but i still think they lost too quickly
@@Lynndie-2003 sarcastic 🤣🤣🤣
France has no chance, they have AMX 30s (1966 years) against T-80s (1976) therefore with ERA armor

Amx isn't a main battle tank. It's a cavalry light one. Leclerc is the french battle tank of that era.
@@user-vu9xl2yz4sthis makes the fight even more unequal because Russia has MBTs but France does not.
😂😂😂😂😂on a des chars leclerc et beaucoup de nouveaux jouets fait des recherches avant de dire des choses comme ça la plus part des matériels sont neufs
@@flaker67 je sais mais la je part de la vidéo, il n'a pas de MBT français
Eugen ne veut pas mettre de leclerc dans warno car selon eux il n'était pas au point dans les années 1980 (ajouter le ka 50 ne les dérange pas cependant), en espérant que des mods permettront d'amener warno à l'ère moderne
Alors ben sûr, il faut prendre en compte que ceci est une simulation et que la situation serait totalement différente dans la vraie vie, on ne dirait pas comme ça, mais une bataille France contre USSR pourrait durée extrêmement longtemps, car ce qui est mal fait dans cette simulation, c'est que les sols sont clairement sans pitié pour aller conquérir un territoire qu'ils soient solos ou à plusieurs, il y a quand même une stratégie à aborder avant de foncer tête baisser sur un point de capture, que ça soit des chars armored ou light aussi laisser un seul char au front tout seul personne ne ferait ça il y aura forcément un soutien aérien ou terrestre que ça soit au niveau de l'infanterie ou de la technologie, malgré le fait que la carte peu être une carte réaliste 90% des combats ne se feront jamais sur une plaine à découvert sans villes ou arbre à proximité, la plaine, c'est le pire biome dans une bataille ouverte et terrestre. Pour faire simple, sur le niveau que pourrait mener une telle bataille entre ces deux blocs de puissance, USSR aurait gagné, c'est sûr, mais avec un handicap extrêmement élevé, une perte d'homme colossal et une technologie très vieillissante, car généralement l'USSR met tout dans la quantité que dans la qualité dans n'importe quel domaine technologique, met par contre la France, elle aurait gagné l'aspect technique de la guerre quand il s'agit du coût de main d'œuvre, de la coordination de troupes et l'expérience dans un domaine à temps, j'imagine standard vu la carte et très européen de campagne ce genre de conflit pourrait mettre les deux camps extrêmement mal, mais les dégâts se jouerai plus en faveur des USSR car qui dit beaucoup de monde dit plus de chance de mourir vite, c'est pour ça que le nombre ne fait pas la force d'une armée
I don't even understand what you are saying. But i can tell its a angry french men.
The USSR had the most advanced tanks, aircraft, helicopters, and by the way, mass wins over quality
Думаю очевидно, что ссср легко бы победил францию, но в реальности суть в том, что чтобы добраться до франции нужно было одалеть западную германию, где были бы расположенны силы нато.
J ai analyser la partie j ai trouvé un truc louche quand a la fin de la partie l offensive français avec commencer beaucoup trop tard pas eu assez de temps pour un effet sur la partie puis ensuite on a pas vues une seule fois les lance missile français ni les Cesaer et l aviation on a vues au debut met apres plus rien en plus jai pas dit russe prq il y a des chats des anné 50 et des chard des anné 80 et des camion français disparait ??
Game?🤣🤣🤣
Ton orthographe et ta syntaxe sont des armes de destruction massive.
Je me sens égyptologue devant ce commentaire
@@leguman5289 dsl j ai pas le temp :l
A ses poursa que les gens font une crises cardiaque on regardant mon commentaires XD
But it wouldn’t be France vs Russia…..would it? France is part of this little coalition you may have heard of…..
This isn’t a Nato Video
France withdrew from NATO historically and only recently rejoined.
Pour évite toute critique dans Warno la France est le pays avec le moins d’unité car on nous a pas développé donc un équilibrage inexistant
Il faut jouer sur la mobilité et les troupes aéro.
De toute façon la coalition du pacte avec les grosses divisions T80 sont OP
How are you able to spectate ai vs ai games?
L'empereur nous mènera a la victoire !! 🇨🇵🇨🇵
Isn’t Your country a republic?
@@Someone111ify our Republic is not going to make us victorious (and since our country goes destroyed). It's the baddest thing we got ever. So yes, a lot of french people prefer monarch like the Bourbon dynastie or best, Bonaparte one.
Vive l'empereur ! 🇨🇵
@@floclr5150 Hmm, I see. If you go back to the Imperial system. The racial population can be numbered?
Where is MBT in France?
peut étre le jeux non contient pas ?
Not here because Warno don’t like French…
@@crabearmy1749 you know that the creator of warno are french ?
Game is placed in 1989, French only hat AMX 30 at the time, leclerc came later.
makes one million German soldiers vs one million American soldiers.
If the Napoléonic wars happened in the cold war:
Быстро сражение закончилось ( только танки стали наступать и всё сражение закончилось. Сделайте пожалуйста сражение длиннее
I love watching this game but I am absolute trash at the micro involved in actually playing it.
Подскажи пожалуйста как сделать ИИ против ИИ?
Как называется игра
@@tohirtohir92 warno
В сингл плейр заходишь ставишь двух ботов по разные стороны и сам занимаешь какуе то сторону. До окончания боя просто стой в афк чтобы боты сами сражались. Потом на повторе смотрешь за боем, как автор ролика.
@@dobrendo5909 тю бля так не интересно
Can you make Indonesia VS Australia please?
Literally how and why? lmao
У Франции ещё был шанс😂😂😂
Russia lose Crimean War and five coalitions against France😂
Then today Russia is the second army in Ukraine 😂
@@AdélaïdeFrance Moscow visit Napoleon 1815
Battle of Waterloo, Today Ukraine can’t even hit Russian Artillery’s 😂 Ukraine Lost 4-8million civilians,
Their Front is Collapsing,Ukraine Didn’t Advanced Pr take back its cities or farms Since Summer 2023 and Then your telling Ukraine is stronger? What a Joke
@@luritual7390 Moscow visited Napoleon? Do you mean rather that Moscow helped by British money, the British army, the Prussian, German, Austrian, Italian, Spanish armies? Why Russia must always need its allies 😂. France won at Austerlitz in 1v2 against Russia and at Friedland in 1v1, Berezina 1v1, France won too. But if the allies are there it's simpler 😂. And the same for Waterloo. It only takes several people to defeat France😂. Bro, Russia lost in Crimea in 1853, lost to JAPAN in 1905, lost in 1916 and in 1920 to Poland 😂
@@luritual7390 and take 2 years for fight Ukraine and a little territory
@@AdélaïdeFrance Beause it’s fighting the whole fcking continental Supplies of Military Aid, Telling Russia will be Pushback to Moscow and Retake Crimea in late 2022-2023, fighting with shovels and washing machines tech. Ukraine falling Military and Population decline its taking a tole😂😂🤣
Pleace Brazil VS EUA !
Brazil is not in the game
No way France would win this!
Average Virgin Cringe Brainless Fatherless Anti France Troll Fanboy taking Copium over here ⬆️
Man where do I get this game? It look fun asf
It's called WARNO
How do I play this game
!!!ARGENTINA VS CHILE!!! jajajaja 🇨🇱 💙🇦🇷
Nah arg vs bra
R.I.P moi qui est françai 😢 mais je suis pour les deux car vous les américains vous nous avez aidé a libérer la France des mains des allemands pendant la seconde guerre mondiale 😔🤗❤❤❤❤
Oui l'histoire est écrite par les vainqueurs. Mais n'oubliez jamais qui a bombardé nos villes normandes jusqu'à la destruction totale pour aucune raison stratégique ou tactique. N'oubliez pas que les américains ne voulaient pas nous mettre sur le banc des vainqueurs et que cela n'a été possible uniquement par la pression de Staline. N'oubliez pas non plus que sans la catastrophique opération Barbarossa l'armée allemande aurait eu tout le loisir de renvoyer les alliés à la flotte. Les français ont libérés la France. La 2eme DB, les résistants, les soldats Kieffer ...
USSR
Russia not able to win against Ukraine with soviet weapons so imagine France or any members of NATO 😂
Russia fights with modern weapons and not those made in the USSR. and Ukraine can't win with Abrams and other crap from 40+ NATO countries. Now imagine what will happen if France alone fights against Russia
@@fyurerys It has been shown that at the start of the conflict Russia fought with old Soviet weapons. The Western aid excuse is pitiful. Ukraine won the Battle of kyiv at the start of the conflict without any help and today Russia is helped by China, Iran and North Korea. 2 years to take a small territory from Ukraine, a real shame. If Russia were to fight NATO or just France, it would be defeated quickly.
@@fyurerys Ukraine can't win? However, if the war is not over, that means that Ukraine has not lost. And a country like that against Russia, holding out for two years, maybe three next year, is half a victory. Not to mention that NATO is strengthened and the Europeans are rearming. So it is a political defeat for Russia.
Russia made a lot of mistakes at the beginning! But not now! The entire Western world is helping Ukraine with weapons and money! NATO specialists trained their military before the war! In Ukraine, besides Ukrainians, there are mercenaries! Ukraine itself is under constant mobilization! In fact, the Russian army has been in the minority since the first days of the war! Only 150-190 thousand troops they invaded while in 2003 the USA invaded Iraq with one and a half million troops!The old weapons were used mainly by militias from the DPR
Before the war, Ukraine itself had a well-armed army! Ukraine inherited a huge number of different arsenals from the USSR, which made it stronger than the post-Soviet countries after Russia!In fact, Ukraine is stronger than France! Because they are really fighting! Russia is also faced with a regular army that has armored vehicles, aviation and artillery, plus support from NATO! Russia only uses a limited number of troops because for them this is a military operation! Are you even aware that Russia does not use all of its arsenal? If you try to invade Russia itself, how many days will you last? We also see that Russia is fighting against the army and not against civilians! We saw Israel fight! If the Russians didn’t care about civilians, then Kyiv flared up long ago!
At that time, France or even the United States were fighting against a crowd of shepherds who did not even have normal armored vehicles, not to mention drone aircraft and artillery!Russia also effectively destroyed the shepherds in Syria, if you remember!
Don’t even take into account the fact that at what cost the Ukrainians are fighting! Also, don’t take into account the fact that the war in Ukraine changes the doctrine and proves that there is no quick victory in modern warfare! Even the Americans do not have such an opportunity at the moment against Iran! Because a well-funded army can repel any aggressor!
In general, in this video it’s the USSR! This is another country, another army! In the 80s the French had no chance against the USSR
You nerd, try to invade Russia itself with only the armies of France!
Con 100 soviéticos habían tenido, los franceses siempre se rinden!
Country with the most victories in history, cry about it
don't forget that it was the Russian winter that saved you twice, first from Napoleon and then from the mustachioed without this winter getting your butt kicked.
@@Wasky378Такой бред пишешь, а что, русские от холода не умирали?). Не зима помогла, а люди. А плохому танцору как говорится, всё мешает).
@@Mad-MaxMad-MaxУверен? Есть статистика хотя-бы.
@@ВикторТокарев-з2з France crushed you in all wars and often France alone against everyone, you were in alliances against France with the Austrians and the Prussians and the English ,...and the French crushed you like flies.
And last time the Berezina, the French crushed you in all the battles up to Moscow and you were forced to burn Moscow and flee until winter...
and Berizena is in Belarus not in Russia, so with you there were the Belarusians and the Ukrainians with you against France ...
Not to mention that the majority of Napoleon's army was at war in Spain so shut up.
Today ukraine will crush you alone🤣 .