ALL NEW 2024 Ford Ranger | Honest Review and 0-60

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 30 май 2024
  • Welcome back guys! Here’s my review of the all new 2024 Ford Ranger Lariat 4x4 with the 2.3 turbo eco boost engine. But this truck is also available as an XL, XLT, and Raptor with a 2.7 or 3.0 twin turbo engine.
    Like, comment, subscribe, and take care! 😎
    Dealer link below…
    www.goodeford.com/
    00:00 Intro
    00:38 Walk Around and Specs
    04:58 Driver Side Interior
    09:48 Bed and Cargo Area
    10:32 Passenger Side Interior
    11:14 Engine
    12:06 Initial Driving Impressions
    14:53 0-60 on GPS
    15:40 Final Thoughts

Комментарии • 58

  • @Raven00714
    @Raven00714 27 дней назад +10

    I have the Raptor Ranger and for the money it's the best riding, handling and comfortable truck I've ever owned, and im coming from a 2020 Ranger xlt fx4

    • @AutomotiveAnonymous208
      @AutomotiveAnonymous208  27 дней назад +2

      That’s awesome! Thanks for sharing your ownership experience, and keep enjoying that sweet truck! 😎

  • @GPCCPA
    @GPCCPA 12 дней назад +2

    My opinion: after comparing and driving the new Tacoma and Colorado, I ordered the Ranger Lariat 2.7. Each truck has its good points, but the Ranger is simply a better truck overall…..in my opinion.

    • @AutomotiveAnonymous208
      @AutomotiveAnonymous208  11 дней назад

      That’s awesome! I’m glad you found the right one for you and also test drove a few competitors.

  • @mikegrantham7440
    @mikegrantham7440 25 дней назад +2

    I prefer the center console to be low. I don't like the huge center consoles that come up high and cut into your front seat leg room. I hate it when I feel like my legs are down in hole.

  • @fburnrostro95
    @fburnrostro95 27 дней назад +5

    Love the redesign of the Ranger. Hated the previous look. But man i hate that ipad infotainment and screen gauge cluster. Coming from a gen z-er not a boomer.

    • @AutomotiveAnonymous208
      @AutomotiveAnonymous208  27 дней назад +1

      Haha I love that you clarified you’re not a boomer. I seriously don’t understand why every auto maker is bandwagoning on integrating their moderately slow operating iPad displays in their current generation cars. If they’re going to do that regardless of what people want couldn’t they at least be engineered better like Tesla. 🤦‍♂️

  • @deanmay338
    @deanmay338 25 дней назад

    Thank you for sharing the payload.

    • @AutomotiveAnonymous208
      @AutomotiveAnonymous208  25 дней назад +1

      Of course! I try to include that photo in every full review video I do. Usually the numbers I find on the door are somewhat far off what Google provided payload numbers are for whatever reason. There must be a lot of variation between trim levels and options. 🙂

    • @deanmay338
      @deanmay338 25 дней назад

      @@AutomotiveAnonymous208 great job providing the photo of the payload for the individual truck. I have found the “max” payload advertised by the manufacturer to be a bogus number in terms of real world payload. Very few people will buy a base trim, no optioned, standard cab pickup and most dealers don’t stock them. Typically, as the options and trims go up, payload goes down. I have seen $70K luxury trucks with less than 1,000 lbs of payload. Completely unusable for my needs. Thanks again.

    • @AutomotiveAnonymous208
      @AutomotiveAnonymous208  23 дня назад +1

      Thanks! I’m not overly impressed with this specific review of mine, especially because the wind noise was horrendous so I kind of rushed the video with mostly one take footage. But I try to include the payload on every truck. And like you said, when I’ve reviewed Silverado ZR2 Bisons they have a 1,048 payload lol 😂

  • @mikegrantham7440
    @mikegrantham7440 25 дней назад

    Perhaps the seat was set high. It can be lowered.

    • @AutomotiveAnonymous208
      @AutomotiveAnonymous208  25 дней назад +1

      I did actually move the seat around a little bit, but still to me it felt like you’re sitting on top of the vehicle rather than sunken into it. Not necessarily a bad thing, it was just that paired with the styling of the center console and infotainment display I wasn’t a big fan of that combination. Overall, it was a pretty fun truck to drive. 🙂

  • @komunakomunalska1664
    @komunakomunalska1664 10 дней назад

    what was the real fuel consumption

    • @AutomotiveAnonymous208
      @AutomotiveAnonymous208  10 дней назад

      That’s a good question but in my couple hours with the truck I wouldn’t have been able to get an accurate reading with how much idle and acceleration time the truck received.

  • @MarkBco
    @MarkBco 27 дней назад +2

    I test drove a Ranger XLT FX4 last weekend thinking it was the one because it had the least worst back seat (I’m 6-3), better fuel mileage, and the fold down back seat. Wasn’t that bothered by the iPad screen until I test drove a Colorado Z71 right after. MUCH better layout for the screen. Totally worth giving up a headlight switch and some back seat utility.

    • @AutomotiveAnonymous208
      @AutomotiveAnonymous208  26 дней назад +1

      I’m glad you found the right truck for you! I’ve driven a few of the new Colorado and Canyons, I’ve even compiled a 0-60 video of them. They’re very sharp looking trucks!

    • @cs1992
      @cs1992 26 дней назад

      Good Choice. That touchscreen in the Ranger is awful (ergonomically). My bother-in-law has a new Colorado and it's a great truck.

    • @devildog5354
      @devildog5354 24 дня назад

      I assume your (6-3)ness will be sitting in the 'front' seat (laughing)...

    • @MarkBco
      @MarkBco 23 дня назад

      @@devildog5354 Ha, very true, but I do pity anyone that has to sit behind me!

  • @robertholland796
    @robertholland796 16 дней назад

    Contractors will thank Ford this feature: 48.2” between the rear wheelhouses, this is new for this generation. That means it’s 4x8 friendly; can’t say that for the Tacoma, Frontier, Colorado or Canyon.
    Bonus point: the vents on the front fenders are functional. I discovered that after a test drive and felt warm air coming from them.
    Nits:
    Digital speedo readout is way too large. It screams at you. On my car, a Subaru Crosstrek, the readout is about 1/3 the size. It whispers to the driver, and is much more pleasant and less distracting.
    Rear seat should have a 60/40 split.
    Only the Raptor has a 4WD Auto mode. That should be available on all 4WD models.
    I think the factory navigation is subscription-based. I don’t like that.
    Wish they had retained the steel front bumper that the previous generation had. Yeah, I know the Raptor has a steel front bumper.

  • @HiPlains1
    @HiPlains1 22 дня назад

    There is a lever to lower seat. You do know that? IMO, Ranger has the most comfortable seats in class. I've sat in them all and the Ford is the best by a long shot.

    • @AutomotiveAnonymous208
      @AutomotiveAnonymous208  22 дня назад

      Yeah, I do, but thank you for sharing that! I had it lowered just a bit from how it was when I first got into the truck. For whatever reason though it still just didn’t feel right to me. 🤷‍♂️

    • @HiPlains1
      @HiPlains1 22 дня назад

      @@AutomotiveAnonymous208 probably your body habitus. By any chance have you been driving a tacoma? In that cabin you sit on the floor with legs straight out. I can't stand that but some might be used to that. You definitely won't like a range rover. You sit almost upright on that.

    • @AutomotiveAnonymous208
      @AutomotiveAnonymous208  17 дней назад

      I’ve actually driven about 75k miles in Tacomas (I use to own a second and third gen). But that was way before I started making car videos part time. I would be curious to see how those trucks feel now that I have my current perspectives and experiences to draw from. They were both manuals, and I’m sure the shifter throw length and numbness would feel very disappointing lol. 😂

  • @TREVORJB101
    @TREVORJB101 26 дней назад +1

    My family loves your reviews! ESPECIALLY, my mom! She immediately drops what she's doing whenever she hears your voice. Just recently, around 3am, dad caught her playing...Read more

  • @Sasquatchflow
    @Sasquatchflow 26 дней назад +1

    Really disappointed in Toyota not having a V6 option and that’s what’s making want a Ranger! Nice truck 👍🏻

  • @marklihsu
    @marklihsu 23 дня назад

    The payload is only 1500 lbs while the taco is 1200 across trims 😂

    • @AutomotiveAnonymous208
      @AutomotiveAnonymous208  23 дня назад

      Nice job Ranger! The ZR2 Bison Silverado only has a payload of like 1,048 from what I remember from my most recent review lol.

    • @HiPlains1
      @HiPlains1 22 дня назад

      @@AutomotiveAnonymous208 When you add tons of weight with the underpinnings it always takes away from capacity. This effects ALL oems. P4X, ZR2, Raptor, TRD pro etc.. all suck as far as tow/bed capacity. But that is not what they were built for.

    • @AutomotiveAnonymous208
      @AutomotiveAnonymous208  17 дней назад

      💯 but I still think the ZR2 payload rating is funny. 😆 I’ve reviewed a Raptor R but I can’t remember what its actual sticker rating was, so it must have not been terribly low to not be memorable. Both were very fun off road trucks.

    • @HiPlains1
      @HiPlains1 17 дней назад

      @@AutomotiveAnonymous208 Ranger Raptor has payload of 1411 lbs and 5510 tow. Raptor probably has higher bed capacity because normally can carry 1860 which is impressive for a mid size. You can also put a pallet of pellets in that but not quite. Also I'm surprised the Raptor can only tow 5510 lbs. Even my 2019 Pro 4X can has a tow capacity of 6100 lbs. Personally if I bought the Ranger I'd get the base 2.3 eco. Its the most reliable motor Ford makes. That 3 liter is nice and has allot of power but has historically had problems. Even the 2.7 has been trash in allot of the broncos. Nope, that 2.3 is the way to go and it still has the same tow/carry numbers. I also test drove a ZR 2 back in 2019 and agree that suspension amazing. Those multimatic shocks is like riding on air. My dealer has three of them for 49K bucks. Its tempting considering how expensive the raptor and TRD pro are going to be.

  • @cs1992
    @cs1992 26 дней назад

    The touchscreen is a deal breaker

  • @dudeski934
    @dudeski934 21 день назад

    I want a Ranger KingRanch with the 3.0 V6

  • @NGMonocrom
    @NGMonocrom 27 дней назад +3

    Looks good, but it's too big.

    • @AutomotiveAnonymous208
      @AutomotiveAnonymous208  27 дней назад +1

      Compared to a third gen Ranger this feels like a super duty lol.

    • @jedwin4816
      @jedwin4816 25 дней назад

      My first pick-up truck was a used 1987 stripo Ranger reg cab. Compared to this new one it's like one of those 6v battery kiddie cars by today's standards. This new Ranger is still smaller than an F150 for sure but it's not a small truck.

  • @scupking
    @scupking 25 дней назад

    That vertical screen is horrible. Just like it's horrible in Teslas....

    • @AutomotiveAnonymous208
      @AutomotiveAnonymous208  25 дней назад

      I will say after driving a few Teslas and what I’ve seen in my brothers Model Y Performance their screen and software is way better than any other auto makers vehicle I’ve driven. But I still prefer physical knobs and buttons.

  • @devildog5354
    @devildog5354 24 дня назад

    I'll keep the $50K +$10K (interest & taxes) in my pocket and keep driving my 2006...

    • @AutomotiveAnonymous208
      @AutomotiveAnonymous208  24 дня назад

      An 06 3rd gen Ranger sounds like a good little truck!

    • @devildog5354
      @devildog5354 24 дня назад

      @@AutomotiveAnonymous208 Sorry, it's a Frontier with 6MT...

    • @HiPlains1
      @HiPlains1 22 дня назад +1

      @@devildog5354 Yes the Frontier was loads better then the last gen Ranger every day of the week and twice on Sundays.

    • @devildog5354
      @devildog5354 22 дня назад

      @@HiPlains1 The old Rangers never had a crew cab either; had to get a Sport Trac if one wanted a midsize Ford...

  • @thomaslehmann5981
    @thomaslehmann5981 21 день назад

    All these people doing 0 60 at 3000+feet of elevation. Meaningless

    • @AutomotiveAnonymous208
      @AutomotiveAnonymous208  20 дней назад

      Lol, I mean it’s meaningless for those who live as sea level, but not for us who live at altitude. 🤪🤷‍♂️

  • @Kevin-mk6jo
    @Kevin-mk6jo 27 дней назад +2

    If i wanted an Ipad... i would get one (dont want one).... so yeah i dont want one in any car.

    • @AutomotiveAnonymous208
      @AutomotiveAnonymous208  27 дней назад

      It seems like most automakers are starting to push that style of infotainment screen. I don’t recall if it’s the NCAP or some other EU testing organization that’s recently took a stand from some features not being screen controlled for the vehicle to be able to be rated with the highest safety ratings. So there is hope, lol. Screens look good, but we’re already surrounded by to many screens in life. 😬

  • @Dubbadizzo86
    @Dubbadizzo86 26 дней назад +1

    Yeah it's cool and all, but the only people I see that seem to be able to afford one are you review guys. Nobody is buying these overpriced trucks. I'll take half this truck for a quarter of the price before I spend any money.

    • @daphoneguy934
      @daphoneguy934 26 дней назад +1

      XL is 37K

    • @AutomotiveAnonymous208
      @AutomotiveAnonymous208  26 дней назад

      This 5th gen has traveled a long ways away from Kansas with toto riding shotgun compared to what the first 3 gen’s had been!

    • @ajmedeiros77
      @ajmedeiros77 24 дня назад

      Nobody? They sell out every year and most evey pickup sold. Hundreds of thousands of trucks sold. I’d never buy a new truck today. Way too expensive, but obviously many many people can afford it

    • @marklihsu
      @marklihsu 23 дня назад

      Taco is overpriced

    • @HiPlains1
      @HiPlains1 22 дня назад

      GM sold a ton of trucks last quarter. They seem to be killing it of late.