Here is a true, honest video. I always read on reddit people claiming that more expensive gear makes very little difference and how their sounds better just based on room tratment. I call it complete bullshit. I have been to a couple of friends' homes with 100k+ systems and they do sound that good. Simply amazing. I cannot afford it, so I enjoy what I have but I will be the 1st to admit that more expensive systems, when setup right, sound much better than mine. Period.
$100,000 system in someones home probably sounds as good as a sub $10,000 in a treated room. Have you ever listened in a studio? Did you friends have shit all over the room with a $100,000 system? I believe you that it sounds good but there is little roi past a few grand unless your gonna spend money on the room too
If you are spending $100,000 on a system, you are likely doing a lot with your room too. I will say that my $25,000 fully active Legacy Audio Aeris with Wavelet can compete quite nicely with this $100,000 system. However, it totally blows away my old system, which costed $10,000. I still have my old system but just don't listen to it any more. Hearing the McIntosh with Il Cremonese for the first time was caused me to look to upgrading my old system.
In my experience, it boils down to power. When you want to go high power (what I would consider 100wpc+ for hifi) stuff gets expensive, fast. It's very easy to build a decent $10k high power system, with class D or A/B, but to get really TOTL life changing sound, from 100wpc+, ya $100k starting. NOW, this is why I stay in the realm of fleawatt. 5-15wpc extremely high sensitivity speakers (95db+ minimum). The difference between a $5000 SET amp, and a $25k SET amp, isn't that much. As long as you do your research, and get the right stuff. There isn't much to SET, gotta have really good OPT, coupling caps, circuit, tubes. Simple stuff, not that complex. The different between a $5000 high power (100wpc+) amp, and a $25k high power amp, is enormous, really big difference. So I'd say, know what you can afford, and know your wheelhouse. Will a fleawatt system ever produce the earth shattering dynamics and impact of a $100K+ high watt system, never. Will it produce the same or better timbre/tone/resolution/air, absolutely, yes. Meaning a well crafted $10-15k fleawatt vs $100k high power system, if crafted correctly, will easily compete with the $100k system in timbre/tone/resolution/air.
I think you are generally correct but I always like to point out the law of diminishing returns with these kinds of discussions. The price of squeezing out the the last 25% or 10% of performance has almost exponential cost when based on a mid priced audiophile system going upwards. For me the holy grail is a balanced system with attention to room treatment.
Last week I went to my hifi dealer to buy a Rega Elex-R amp and was treated to a one hour listening session in their main room with my choice of music. Sometimes they call me to show up and listen to the good stuff even if I'm not buying anything. You can't beat a physical store with staff who is passionate about the products they sell. The system had a pair of Wilson Sasha speakers, two Dan D'Agostino Momentum M400 Mono amps, a dCS CD transport and a Metronome DAC. When I went back home I was walking on air, completely struck by the experience so I can imagine how you felt listening to that McIntosh setup. Now back down to Earth to the realistic enjoyment of my Elex-R + Dali Oberon 5 + Marantz CD6006. It's not exquisite but it's mine and I love it.
@@Jos3Miguel Thank you, this system is singing to me! Yep, Imacustica. They treat a normal guy like me as well as someone who buys a €20,000 amp and it's always fun to go there for sure. Also, you get to hear how things sound before you buy them. That's why I'm a loyal customer.
Agreed. The Parasound P6 2.1 preamp/DAC has bass and treble controls right on the front panel. Switch in and out with a simple button on the lighted remote......NICE (O:
I recently got an MC152 after years of money saved and I can also attest to it, it made a huge difference. My LS50s sound completely different than they used to on my Rotel integrated. I personally love the McIntosh sound and build, i feel you get your moneys worth
I had the MA 5200. It was absolutely incredible. One of the best amps I've ever had. Only reason why I sold it was I went with a different direction in my system and needing multi-channel pre-amp and power amp.
@Steve Guttenberg Audiophiliac, did you spend any time with Franz at the McIntosh Townhouse? I was in NYC last February, before the pandemic hit, to see Opeth play two nights at The Apollo Theater. The Friday I was there, I spent the entire afternoon strolling through the Townhouse with Franz and Sammy, listening to the setup in each room on all 5 floors. What an AMAZING day! Every time I listen to the system in the main living room / meeting area, I become "gobstopped" and just sink into the couch! Unreal. The 7-foot tall McIntosh XRT2.1K speakers are absolute beasts. I couldn't believe each speaker was being driven by three McIntosh Amps -- a separate amp for the bass, mids, and tweeters. Then I discovered each speaker's four-way design utilized 81 drivers! The "Clock Room" is another favorite! I became a big Sonus Faber fan because of the World of McIntosh Townhouse. I can't wait for the day that I can return to NYC and my favorite listening utopia.
Hey Steve Like your review on the new McIntosh amps.. Went to audio classics last year spent the weekend listening to different tube amps..I end up buying the MC 2301s tube amps.. Best tube amp I ever heard.. I found my holy grail of amps....
Typically, bi-wire inputs on speakers do not decouple the respective low-pass/high-pass networks between the woofers and tweeters. I would be curious to know what the inherent crossover points from the Sonus Faber’s woofer to mid-range sections are. The 250 Hz crossover setting of the amplifier seems low which could result in a big hole in the lower mid-range. I would think that setting the amp’s low-pass output an octave higher than the woofer’s low pass section, and visa-versa for the mid/high section would yield better results to avoid dropping out a portion of the audio spectrum due to a mismatch. Some clarification on the rationale of the choice of amplifier settings would have been helpful.
When bi-amping with two different amps, I can see you need to adjust relative volume levels. But why have a crossover in the amp in addition to the crossover in the speakers?
mrsuppertime1, it's a good point. These are glorified tone controls, rolling off the frequencies at the determined point, by the specified amount. As you rightly say, you have to retain the crossovers in the speakers. In bi-amp mode, the signal from the valve amp is going to the tweeter and midrange units, so the crossover must further divide the signal. On the bass side, you would need to be sure the roll off was correctly matched to the driver, which the crossover does, otherwise you may introduce break up nodes at the upper end, above its stated operating range. It's a novel concept to introduce valves into the treble and midrange, that's all.
I just connected everything but front meter lights not coming on even though the knob is correct position and tubes stays dim amber but not green. I'm using balanced and all cables are correct can you tell me what I'm doing wrong thank you
What does the MC 901 have more tubes than the MC 2301 - there are four more small tubes on each mono. I thought it was the same as the MC 2301 but it's different.
I have to say that after owning the Il Cremonese for about 3 or 4 years now they still Amaze me. Totally beautiful sound. Thank you Sonus Faber and Thank you Steve for this video.
I've been a fan of Sonus Faber for many years without actually owning any. My friend had Electa Amator 2 followed by Cremonas and latterly Olympica Nova 3 driven by monobloc valve amps by Icon Audio, a small UK brand local to us. The experience is hard to describe. As good as they are my active ATCs can't paint a picture in the same way. So I'm not at all surprised that you like SF.
A system of dreams! I really hope to own something like this one day. I also thoroughly enjoy your inclusion of music! I pause and go and find everything you are referring to! really appreciate you broadening my music knowledge!
Don't really enjoy Macintosh equipment myself, I think it's great but there are many other brands out there that I prefer. But towards the end you talked about the built-in crossover between tube and solid state and tweaking it at whatever megahertz point, in your case 250 and raising or lowering the levels by x amount of decibels... This is such an amazing concept! I think for the first time with Macintosh gear I got hooked. I'm definitely going to visit a dealer, check out these amps and experiment with them myself. What you described is such an interesting and perhaps highly worthwhile capability. Thanks for the video!
LOL, the pro sound and studio monitoring / mixing industries have been using DSP and digital crossovers for a couple decades now. The home Hi Fi industry is decades behind - well, except for McIntosh
@@petersouthernboy6327 Yeah I know, I realize that, but for home audio gear I'd rather have the physical switches... DSP need not apply. And perhaps you're right, maybe they are years behind, or they just want simplicity for people who aren't fiddling constantly with the music and the sounds but want a purity from their source. Studios are mixing, home enthusiasts/listeners are listening... But I have to tell you I really like the controls he was referring to, and I am by no means and Macintosh fan.
@@mesonto - I use a Xilica XP 4080 DSP biamped into Klipsch Jubilees in my listening room. Astonishingly better than the passive crossover and single amp. I’m seeing more and more of it in home systems.
I am an old guy. The last thing you did with your saved up money in Viet Nam was to go to the PX buy your stereo equipment . My buddy bought a McIntosh system. I bought a Sansui with Klipsch speakers and a reel to reel. Got on the plane and came home. Still have the receiver.
How did you get the snares so tight and isolated to the left on Stank with a binaural mic setup? Seems like this was not just a fake head with two mics. Maybe something like a couple sheets of plywood with foam on both sides?
OK I believe you but do giant killing systems exist too? Can you put together simple high sensitivity speakers with low component number tube or transistor amps that can better the expensive stuff?
Steve. I have been looking at the McIntosh Townhouse online. Do you have a list of “must see” audio stores or experiences in NYC? Especially places that are open to the average hifi enthusiast! Ty
Ohh Steve...whenever you mention the album: Explorations In Space & Time, it always get's me kind of sad :-( I'm nto a streaming guy, so i need it on CD, but it's impossible to get anywhere around the world, unless your willing to spend crazy amounts of money. Could it be possible to claim a re-issue in a physical format, that would be appreciated? ;-) Cheers from Denmark
Yet again, cue up The Rutles, "All you need is cash . . . " Full disclosure: I think McIntosh gear is soooo cool. It was burned into my adolescent brain at a brick and mortar stereo specialist in Kansas City in the ancient, halcyon days of the late 1960s - early '70s. And now, as then, I can't possibly afford it. Still, the metaphorical heart wants what it wants and even if only in day dreams for me, I am glad that it continues to exist in the outside world. And sounds great. Thank for sharing this Steve G.
Many questions. These are stereo biamplifiers right? So why 2 in the system? That makes 8 channels of amplification. 4 bass and 4 mid/treble. Yet it seems the speakers are only biamped. Are the amps bridged? Then regarding the crossovers. Are the sonus faber internal crossovers removed ? Or are the amp crossovers combined with them? The latter would be very strange. So I guess there were quite a lot of details that would be interesting to learn about.
LOL, the pro sound and studio monitoring / mixing industries have been using DSP and digital crossovers for a couple decades now. The home Hi Fi industry is decades behind.
Steve asked the question near the end of the video why recordings are "screwed around with". As an engineer who specializes in acoustic recordings, I agree that the ideal is that the recordings we produce will be listened at a lifelike volume through a high quality audio system. If most people listened that way, I would be happy to be very hands off but as we all know, this is not how most people listen to music in this time period. Additionally classic jazz recordings have always been "screwed around with" to deal with the dynamic and tonal limitations of vinyl records. That has become a benchmark for how these types of recordings are expected to sound. There are often contradictory pressures how a record should sound going on. If you're doing a record for a company like Chesky, you can take a clearly defined approach but most companies want recordings that work on everything from a big system to tiny white earbuds so therefore engineers need to start "screwing around".
I was a partner in Audio Tweakers back in the early 2000s. My partner could afford anything he wanted. At that time we were exclusive marketing for Nearfield Pipedream loudspeakers, one of the best at that time . YES, his system always sounded amazing, but NOT 10Xs what i could afford. AND most rooms are not properly designed to show off the money spent
@@SteveGuttenbergAudiophiliac hi Steve Years ago it would have been the A8 Smyth Realizer. After almost 5 years of development there is now an A16 model. It fully supports Atmos. Worth a second look.
I had the pleasure to hear these Il Cremonese speakers at an audio show a couple of years back....and they do sound like something completely different, it was a mind-blowingly good experience.
Apropo of nothing, (sort of) I went to college with Peter Gow,(R.I.P.) in the 70's. His dad, Gordon Gow, set him up with a Crown amp and pre-amp, Dual turntable, and Advent speakers, and told him it "would have to do", as he didn't want classmates pestering him for "deals" on a stereo!
That was fun sharing your excitement and impressions. I would love to experience something like that one day. But, I can only imagine what a system like that sounds like. I only hear very high end audio products compromised by the hotel room setting that is an audio marketing show. Since I am clearly not going to buy one of these systems, the few remaining brick and mortar sales organizations in my city qualify me out at the door and make it clear I am not welcome to hear this stuff. That is good. If I heard it and it is better than my DIY stuff, I might buy it. Little do they know, I can actually afford it so they are saving me a bunch of money as they keep me in my DIY box where I save 90% of the $ while I work to recreate the stuff they sell. So its all good. Fun to live vicariously through your video.
Help me understand this Steve if you would please. From looking at the Sonus Faber Il Cremonese owners manual it appears that these speakers can be bi-wired but I don't see any mention of bi-amping. Both methods can use 2 amps, the distinction being that a bi-wired speaker still uses the internal crossover of the speaker whereas bi-amp will use an external crossover like that in the Mac. So how are these set up?
@@meshplates I wasn't able to access the Mac owners manual but there's no way that can be used as a proper crossover without being able to adjust slopes at the minimum. I'm thinking the main purpose is to adjust the levels to compensate for your room set-up. The x-over point would need to be set to match the speakers? Dunno
LOL, the pro sound and studio monitoring / mixing industries have been using DSP and digital crossovers and multi-amping for a couple decades now. The home Hi Fi industry is decades behind - except for McIntosh
Loving the t-shirt! I was at my local dealer they day after they had unboxed them. I wasn't aware until my friend audio consultant/sales person said ...come see this. There they were, two behemoths all fired up and connected to Sonus Faber. Not just beautiful, but ear-gasm like. It was ten minutes of unaffordable bliss!
The Law of Diminishing Returns is unassailable; the question is simply *where* it kicks in. Steve goes on the record here to say that the threshold is north of $100k. The MC901 brings to mind the quote from the Simpsons where Homer orders dinner at a fancy restaurant: “I want your best dish stuffed with your second best dish.”
It depends on the component. With power amps, I had a $1700 Proceed AMP 2. I borrowed a $6000 Mark Levinson amp as well as a $5500 Audio Research tube hybrid amp for a weekend back in 2000. I couldn't hear a difference so didn't bother upgrading. However, speakers are a totally different matter as they interact with the room. Changing electronic components is one thing. Changing physical components is another.
Steve is right about the really expensive stuff, but whether it's worth it to you is another question. I have heard these systems, I could afford one, but I don't own one. Maybe I'm not really an audiophile?
Agree, with high power , the crest factor permits no compression of dynamics , if the coils can take the heath...a direkt radiating system can sound effortless like horns if it can deliver without compression and clipping of amps...give me a 95db/w system and 100 watts and it delivers uncompressed a steinway full power real life sounding...even kef k300 p60 speakers can do 113db
160,000 (!) - just WOW! Back to toppic: maybe kind of overkill? Not shure. And please keep in mind: binaural head recording was developed (in Germany, btw) for headphones! Not for LS!
I wonder how the McIntosh Townhouse compares to the VPI House. I’m guessing a house is larger than a townhouse especially with real estate prices in New York. But the townhouse looks pretty posh. McIntosh was the first audiophile brand I ever heard of. I had a school friend in the 70s with a customer on his paper route who was an audiophile and would invite him in to listen to his system. We weren’t even teenagers at the time and my friend would always rave about the McIntosh gear he had heard. And the brand has always stuck in my head although I’ve never owned any of it.
@@mondoenterprises6710 Jerry used a 50 watters and a stereo fender twin preamp....he ran a lot of his effects through a loop on the guitar. Its almost the les paul approach to ultra clean guitar tone. Not that I was just looking at that last night...lol
If you want to go beyond 901s get 2301s and 611s with a men220 ,more control of the amplifiers than 901crossover add a c22v5 or C1100 and mp1100 and you have true Mc vinyl setup
Have you done this? I thought about doing this since I have 611 but concerned I may be overloading the tube amplifier transformer. The men220 may be good but seems really inconvenient and not sure about tonal issues and matching amp as well as 901 does it. Too bad men220 is only two channel.
Joshua, The WOM Townhouse is one of NYC's greatest attractions! You, Franz, David, and Sammy do a remarkable job -- along with all other staff members. Last February, prior to the pandemic, I was in NYC for two concerts. I spent the entire afternoon of Friday, February 21st, at WOM with two friends and our fantastic host, Franz. I can't wait for normalcy again, so I can fly back up to NYC and revisit your hidden jewel.
My McIntosh 611 monoblocs and Serafino speakers like little kids compared to 901 etc. In any event I love my system even if its half the cost of this one. Of course the sound is better with more expensive systems. I aspire to step up in the next few years to improve the music where I live. Steve I have listened to you for long time and I finally subscribed and will support your efforts love your sincerity. Chilling now and listening to Cassandra Wilson's "Glamoured album" it makes the Serafino speakers sound even better and the scotch helps!.
Would have been nice to have single mic listening position recording w a couple mins of playback. As unlikely as that is to show capability, still would be nice. Excellent "impressions" presentation nonetheless! Thanks for taking the time to experience it and share.
Glad to see your talking about McIntosh Steve. From one of our interactions I was convinced that you and the New York area (and most of the U.S.) didn't care for McIntosh. Yes, I really like that new MC901, but like most people I can't afford them. Still, a very nice piece. I figure by the time they hit the used market and I can afford them I'll be dead or too old to enjoy them. Considering I'm in my early 60s now. LOL! 🤣...just trying to keep my sense of humor...
I only heard of McIntosh a couple weeks ago, I thought someone was talking about the computers. I've sort of been into audio for years and never heard of them. Maybe it is because I'm in UK.
The pro sound and studio monitoring / mixing industries have been using DSP and digital crossovers and multi-amping for a couple decades now. The home Hi Fi industry is decades behind - except for Mac.
Try listening to a fully active Legacy Audio Aeris with Wavelet system. Digital pre-amp with tone control, room correction, and active crossover in the digital realm. The Aeris is also used for mastering in the pro audio community. Mixing tends to be near field with monitors.
@@petersouthernboy6327 I have tri-amped Legacy Audio Aeris speakers with Wavelet preamp. A 500 watt module for each of the 2 subwoofers, a 325 watt module for the midrange and mid woofer, and a 325 watt module for the tweeter and super tweeter. ie. 4 internal power amp modules for each speaker. The speakers are voiced with each other. This allows for very solid imaging, where the instruments take up specific locations and space within the sound stage, and where you can hear a quiet sound which is 2 feet away from a loud sound in the sound stage. The system recreates the sound stage that is in the recording. Hearing the sound stage change in the middle of a track is something that can be quite magical. I guess that it is easier to imagine if you use a mixing work station, where you have some tracks with small room reverb, and other tracks with large room reverb. Start with small room reverb tracks, then add in the large room reverb, and the listening room size seems to grow with the music. With most systems, you won't get this experience of the room feeling like it is changing in size. It is certainly just an illusion, but the strength of the illusion is what makes the difference.
I never understood how one can buy a product where you could manually set the crossover point "to your taste", or at least adjust it. people always talk about "being as true to the master recording" as possible, yet they fiddle around with these things and color the sound beyond what a tube amp already colors - yes, people speak of the "warm" sound. It's coloration. true to the master means neutral - not coloring the sound.
Steve: How was the 1st watt?? So, hundreds of watts are required to make a dynamic speaker project like horns? Interesting 🤓 Your crossover experiment parallels what budget systems do with subs. Listening to DUB on an EL34 amp right now with REL powered subs and DSPeaker room correction. I'm 😊 as long as I don't wake the Mrs
You do got an awesome kickass job Steve.... But youve earned it! This vid has left me with so many questions. McIntosh Townhouse?? In Manhattan? What?? Where?? How long has it been there!?!?! Why no Mac speakers in there? As far as 100k setups being that marginally better; of course it will be if your using same brand components all the way through! ESPECIALLY MCINTOSH! That still doesnt quell the fact you can make $25k sound pretty damn close to $100k if you have the street smarts & experience. Its not gonna be all new unused gear of course, but it can be done!
Ok, I found where it is, makes sense to me now : ) There was once a Bang & Olufsen as well as a Bose flagship store in that general vicinity at one point too.
Being into loudness is a choice. A type of lustening. And being into realistic staging is another thing. Difficult to be into both simultaneously...they are conceptually incompatible.
Here is a true, honest video. I always read on reddit people claiming that more expensive gear makes very little difference and how their sounds better just based on room tratment. I call it complete bullshit. I have been to a couple of friends' homes with 100k+ systems and they do sound that good. Simply amazing. I cannot afford it, so I enjoy what I have but I will be the 1st to admit that more expensive systems, when setup right, sound much better than mine. Period.
Cost is only one variable in the equation to obtain one's choice of sound.
$100,000 system in someones home probably sounds as good as a sub $10,000 in a treated room. Have you ever listened in a studio? Did you friends have shit all over the room with a $100,000 system? I believe you that it sounds good but there is little roi past a few grand unless your gonna spend money on the room too
If you are spending $100,000 on a system, you are likely doing a lot with your room too. I will say that my $25,000 fully active Legacy Audio Aeris with Wavelet can compete quite nicely with this $100,000 system. However, it totally blows away my old system, which costed $10,000. I still have my old system but just don't listen to it any more. Hearing the McIntosh with Il Cremonese for the first time was caused me to look to upgrading my old system.
In my experience, it boils down to power. When you want to go high power (what I would consider 100wpc+ for hifi) stuff gets expensive, fast. It's very easy to build a decent $10k high power system, with class D or A/B, but to get really TOTL life changing sound, from 100wpc+, ya $100k starting.
NOW, this is why I stay in the realm of fleawatt. 5-15wpc extremely high sensitivity speakers (95db+ minimum).
The difference between a $5000 SET amp, and a $25k SET amp, isn't that much. As long as you do your research, and get the right stuff. There isn't much to SET, gotta have really good OPT, coupling caps, circuit, tubes. Simple stuff, not that complex. The different between a $5000 high power (100wpc+) amp, and a $25k high power amp, is enormous, really big difference.
So I'd say, know what you can afford, and know your wheelhouse. Will a fleawatt system ever produce the earth shattering dynamics and impact of a $100K+ high watt system, never. Will it produce the same or better timbre/tone/resolution/air, absolutely, yes. Meaning a well crafted $10-15k fleawatt vs $100k high power system, if crafted correctly, will easily compete with the $100k system in timbre/tone/resolution/air.
I think you are generally correct but I always like to point out the law of diminishing returns with these kinds of discussions. The price of squeezing out the the last 25% or 10% of performance has almost exponential cost when based on a mid priced audiophile system going upwards. For me the holy grail is a balanced system with attention to room treatment.
I don't care if you spend $1,000 or $100,000 on an audio system there's still someone in the other room yelling at you to turn it down
Yes... And more thank likely it will be my wife!
If you are planning to buy these McIntosh monoblocks, make sure you put aside some money for your hernia operation.
170 lbs!!
@@woohunter1 buy a hand truck
That happened to me, true story. I was moving one of my monoblocks and I pulled my right hernia, I had to go for surgery a few days later.
@@veteq101 should have sued the manufacturer
Laughs, in healthcare🤣🤣🤣
Last week I went to my hifi dealer to buy a Rega Elex-R amp and was treated to a one hour listening session in their main room with my choice of music. Sometimes they call me to show up and listen to the good stuff even if I'm not buying anything. You can't beat a physical store with staff who is passionate about the products they sell.
The system had a pair of Wilson Sasha speakers, two Dan D'Agostino Momentum M400 Mono amps, a dCS CD transport and a Metronome DAC. When I went back home I was walking on air, completely struck by the experience so I can imagine how you felt listening to that McIntosh setup.
Now back down to Earth to the realistic enjoyment of my Elex-R + Dali Oberon 5 + Marantz CD6006. It's not exquisite but it's mine and I love it.
Contentment: Priceless!
A visit to Imacustica? Is always a fun experience...
Good system at home, congratulations.
@@Jos3Miguel Thank you, this system is singing to me! Yep, Imacustica. They treat a normal guy like me as well as someone who buys a €20,000 amp and it's always fun to go there for sure. Also, you get to hear how things sound before you buy them. That's why I'm a loyal customer.
It's great that "tone controls" are coming back in fashion all be it in an expensive form with this fantastic set up
Albeit
Agreed. The Parasound P6 2.1 preamp/DAC has bass and treble controls right on the front panel. Switch in and out with a simple button on the lighted remote......NICE (O:
I love steves enthusiasm! Definately a genuine impression of gear in a room.
Definitely!
Who would have thought it, adjusting the frequency response with some tone controls can improve the sound to suit you preference.
Vintage Mcintosh gear was possible to obtain at a relatively low cost back in the day and was essentially my gateway drug to audio. I love Mcintosh.
I recently got an MC152 after years of money saved and I can also attest to it, it made a huge difference. My LS50s sound completely different than they used to on my Rotel integrated. I personally love the McIntosh sound and build, i feel you get your moneys worth
I wonder about the McIntosh MA 5300, can you review that and other McIntosh products in the near future?
I had the MA 5200. It was absolutely incredible. One of the best amps I've ever had. Only reason why I sold it was I went with a different direction in my system and needing multi-channel pre-amp and power amp.
@Steve Guttenberg Audiophiliac, did you spend any time with Franz at the McIntosh Townhouse? I was in NYC last February, before the pandemic hit, to see Opeth play two nights at The Apollo Theater. The Friday I was there, I spent the entire afternoon strolling through the Townhouse with Franz and Sammy, listening to the setup in each room on all 5 floors. What an AMAZING day!
Every time I listen to the system in the main living room / meeting area, I become "gobstopped" and just sink into the couch! Unreal. The 7-foot tall McIntosh XRT2.1K speakers are absolute beasts. I couldn't believe each speaker was being driven by three McIntosh Amps -- a separate amp for the bass, mids, and tweeters. Then I discovered each speaker's four-way design utilized 81 drivers!
The "Clock Room" is another favorite! I became a big Sonus Faber fan because of the World of McIntosh Townhouse. I can't wait for the day that I can return to NYC and my favorite listening utopia.
Hey Steve
Like your review on the new McIntosh amps..
Went to audio classics last year spent the weekend listening to different tube amps..I end up buying the MC 2301s tube amps..
Best tube amp I ever heard.. I found my holy grail of amps....
Typically, bi-wire inputs on speakers do not decouple the respective low-pass/high-pass networks between the woofers and tweeters. I would be curious to know what the inherent crossover points from the Sonus Faber’s woofer to mid-range sections are. The 250 Hz crossover setting of the amplifier seems low which could result in a big hole in the lower mid-range. I would think that setting the amp’s low-pass output an octave higher than the woofer’s low pass section, and visa-versa for the mid/high section would yield better results to avoid dropping out a portion of the audio spectrum due to a mismatch. Some clarification on the rationale of the choice of amplifier settings would have been helpful.
When bi-amping with two different amps, I can see you need to adjust relative volume levels. But why have a crossover in the amp in addition to the crossover in the speakers?
mrsuppertime1, it's a good point. These are glorified tone controls, rolling off the frequencies at the determined point, by the specified amount. As you rightly say, you have to retain the crossovers in the speakers.
In bi-amp mode, the signal from the valve amp is going to the tweeter and midrange units, so the crossover must further divide the signal. On the bass side, you would need to be sure the roll off was correctly matched to the driver, which the crossover does, otherwise you may introduce break up nodes at the upper end, above its stated operating range.
It's a novel concept to introduce valves into the treble and midrange, that's all.
I just connected everything but front meter lights not coming on even though the knob is correct position and tubes stays dim amber but not green. I'm using balanced and all cables are correct can you tell me what I'm doing wrong thank you
What does the MC 901 have more tubes than the MC 2301 - there are four more small tubes on each mono. I thought it was the same as the MC 2301 but it's different.
Effortless sound reproduction is something to strive for and high-quality audio systems.
And I thought Crazy Eddie's prices were Insane!
Good one!
Thanks Steve. Would love to see more McIntosh on the channel!
I have to say that after owning the Il Cremonese for about 3 or 4 years now they still
Amaze me. Totally beautiful sound. Thank you Sonus Faber and Thank you
Steve for this video.
I've been a fan of Sonus Faber for many years without actually owning any. My friend had Electa Amator 2 followed by Cremonas and latterly Olympica Nova 3 driven by monobloc valve amps by Icon Audio, a small UK brand local to us. The experience is hard to describe. As good as they are my active ATCs can't paint a picture in the same way. So I'm not at all surprised that you like SF.
Steve, for the sake of learning and mixing things, what DAC (Not McIntosh) would you pair with this system?
Denafrips Terminator or Mytek Manhattan 2
@@SteveGuttenbergAudiophiliac Thank you so much for taking the time to share your knowledge. It shows how awesome you are.
@@SteveGuttenbergAudiophiliac What about the Mola mola Tambaqui? I already have a Tambaqui and would love to hook it up directly to the mc901s.
A system of dreams! I really hope to own something like this one day. I also thoroughly enjoy your inclusion of music! I pause and go and find everything you are referring to! really appreciate you broadening my music knowledge!
Don't really enjoy Macintosh equipment myself, I think it's great but there are many other brands out there that I prefer.
But towards the end you talked about the built-in crossover between tube and solid state and tweaking it at whatever megahertz point, in your case 250 and raising or lowering the levels by x amount of decibels... This is such an amazing concept! I think for the first time with Macintosh gear I got hooked.
I'm definitely going to visit a dealer, check out these amps and experiment with them myself. What you described is such an interesting and perhaps highly worthwhile capability.
Thanks for the video!
LOL, the pro sound and studio monitoring / mixing industries have been using DSP and digital crossovers for a couple decades now. The home Hi Fi industry is decades behind - well, except for McIntosh
@@petersouthernboy6327 Yeah I know, I realize that, but for home audio gear I'd rather have the physical switches... DSP need not apply.
And perhaps you're right, maybe they are years behind, or they just want simplicity for people who aren't fiddling constantly with the music and the sounds but want a purity from their source.
Studios are mixing, home enthusiasts/listeners are listening... But I have to tell you I really like the controls he was referring to, and I am by no means and Macintosh fan.
@@mesonto - I use a Xilica XP 4080 DSP biamped into Klipsch Jubilees in my listening room. Astonishingly better than the passive crossover and single amp. I’m seeing more and more of it in home systems.
@@petersouthernboy6327 Well, what the hell, I'll take a look at your solution.
@@mesonto - there’s an army of us 😃
community.klipsch.com/index.php?/topic/172395-klipsch-jubilees-and-roys-brand-new-xilica-settings/
I am an old guy. The last thing you did with your saved up money in Viet Nam was to go to the PX buy your stereo equipment . My buddy bought a McIntosh system. I bought a Sansui with Klipsch speakers and a reel to reel. Got on the plane and came home. Still have the receiver.
How did you get the snares so tight and isolated to the left on Stank with a binaural mic setup? Seems like this was not just a fake head with two mics. Maybe something like a couple sheets of plywood with foam on both sides?
I don't need this kidney.
@@n_dawson china's got that market
😂😂😂
You'll need to sell em' both....
I think you’ll need mine and probably my wife’s too.
LMAO!!!
"Diddle the controls" ...sounds like it could be the name of a Zappa song.
OK I believe you but do giant killing systems exist too? Can you put together simple high sensitivity speakers with low component number tube or transistor amps that can better the expensive stuff?
Clearly one of the best and we need more companies to follow their lead!!!!
Steve. I have been looking at the McIntosh Townhouse online. Do you have a list of “must see” audio stores or experiences in NYC? Especially places that are open to the average hifi enthusiast! Ty
The only “must see” in NYC is the train that lets you leave.
What about Apple headphones they announced today? 500 bucks???
did those sonus speakres sounded better then the Alta Audio Titanium Hestia speakers that you heard?
Ohh Steve...whenever you mention the album: Explorations In Space & Time, it always get's me kind of sad :-( I'm nto a streaming guy, so i need it on CD, but it's impossible to get anywhere around the world, unless your willing to spend crazy amounts of money. Could it be possible to claim a re-issue in a physical format, that would be appreciated? ;-) Cheers from Denmark
I'm curious to know how does your personal system compare?
No, this one is way better.
@@SteveGuttenbergAudiophiliac
Wow, yours is certainly no slouch!
Hi Steve , hope you get to review the new C22 preamp and talk about its phono section , and compare it to your current phono reference. Thanks
What stands are the MC901's sitting on?
wish a ratio that favor the equipment in the visuals
[how many time can C the same before it became enough?]
I enjoy that Steve talks with his hands like a true NYC gangster / gun-waving motion like he's spitting lines off the latest HipHop tracks. #EastCoast
No no, that's not right, Steve is just another resting actor from a Woody Allen movie.
Yet again, cue up The Rutles, "All you need is cash . . . "
Full disclosure: I think McIntosh gear is soooo cool. It was burned into my adolescent brain at a brick and mortar stereo specialist in Kansas City in the ancient, halcyon days of the late 1960s - early '70s. And now, as then, I can't possibly afford it. Still, the metaphorical heart wants what it wants and even if only in day dreams for me, I am glad that it continues to exist in the outside world. And sounds great. Thank for sharing this Steve G.
How does the logo look older than the company?
Because it's loosely based on German Blackletter Script from the twelfth to seventeenth centuries?
Because it’s ICONIC
Many questions. These are stereo biamplifiers right? So why 2 in the system? That makes 8 channels of amplification. 4 bass and 4 mid/treble. Yet it seems the speakers are only biamped. Are the amps bridged? Then regarding the crossovers. Are the sonus faber internal crossovers removed ? Or are the amp crossovers combined with them? The latter would be very strange. So I guess there were quite a lot of details that would be interesting to learn about.
LOL, the pro sound and studio monitoring / mixing industries have been using DSP and digital crossovers for a couple decades now. The home Hi Fi industry is decades behind.
those two chesky records are on spotify and what was the loudness levels achieved by this system i was wondering
Thank you Steve, great video! I really appreciate your honesty and enthusiasm. Beautiful system, by the way!!
Steve asked the question near the end of the video why recordings are "screwed around with". As an engineer who specializes in acoustic recordings, I agree that the ideal is that the recordings we produce will be listened at a lifelike volume through a high quality audio system. If most people listened that way, I would be happy to be very hands off but as we all know, this is not how most people listen to music in this time period. Additionally classic jazz recordings have always been "screwed around with" to deal with the dynamic and tonal limitations of vinyl records. That has become a benchmark for how these types of recordings are expected to sound. There are often contradictory pressures how a record should sound going on. If you're doing a record for a company like Chesky, you can take a clearly defined approach but most companies want recordings that work on everything from a big system to tiny white earbuds so therefore engineers need to start "screwing around".
Yes Jon, I agree!
Good review. Why not use Mc speakers?
I was a partner in Audio Tweakers back in the early 2000s. My partner could afford anything he wanted. At that time we were exclusive marketing for Nearfield Pipedream loudspeakers, one of the best at that time . YES, his system always sounded amazing, but NOT 10Xs what i could afford. AND most rooms are not properly designed to show off the money spent
Could you cover that SMYTH Realizer A16? It's supposed to make headphones indistinguishable from a surround sound system.
I did that years ago when it came out, look for it on CNET
@@SteveGuttenbergAudiophiliac I guess you were convinced. Also, it used to cost $2000? Now it's $4000.
@@SteveGuttenbergAudiophiliac hi Steve Years ago it would have been the A8 Smyth Realizer. After almost 5 years of development there is now an A16 model. It fully supports Atmos. Worth a second look.
I had the pleasure to hear these Il Cremonese speakers at an audio show a couple of years back....and they do sound like something completely different, it was a mind-blowingly good experience.
Steve, what is their crossover slope per octave?
Apropo of nothing, (sort of) I went to college with Peter Gow,(R.I.P.) in the 70's. His dad, Gordon Gow, set him up with a Crown amp and pre-amp, Dual turntable, and Advent speakers, and told him it "would have to do", as he didn't want classmates pestering him for "deals" on a stereo!
Can we have a break down on the 100K?
This was fun just for the dream system nature of it. Love that McIntosh takes things to this level.
That was fun sharing your excitement and impressions. I would love to experience something like that one day.
But, I can only imagine what a system like that sounds like. I only hear very high end audio products compromised by the hotel room setting that is an audio marketing show. Since I am clearly not going to buy one of these systems, the few remaining brick and mortar sales organizations in my city qualify me out at the door and make it clear I am not welcome to hear this stuff. That is good. If I heard it and it is better than my DIY stuff, I might buy it. Little do they know, I can actually afford it so they are saving me a bunch of money as they keep me in my DIY box where I save 90% of the $ while I work to recreate the stuff they sell. So its all good. Fun to live vicariously through your video.
Steve, just for fun, what turntable would go best with this system?
SME
Steve...Please tell me where you got that shirt!!
Help me understand this Steve if you would please. From looking at the Sonus Faber Il Cremonese owners manual it appears that these speakers can be bi-wired but I don't see any mention of bi-amping. Both methods can use 2 amps, the distinction being that a bi-wired speaker still uses the internal crossover of the speaker whereas bi-amp will use an external crossover like that in the Mac. So how are these set up?
Just asked the same question! Weird right.
@@meshplates I wasn't able to access the Mac owners manual but there's no way that can be used as a proper crossover without being able to adjust slopes at the minimum. I'm thinking the main purpose is to adjust the levels to compensate for your room set-up. The x-over point would need to be set to match the speakers? Dunno
@@jamesbrotherton5487 Steve is a very technically challenged guy. This may be over his head. Try the forums (there are owner threads)
@@wa2368 I'm sure it's covered in the owners manual of the Mac but Steve didn't set it up himself so he gets a break.
LOL, the pro sound and studio monitoring / mixing industries have been using DSP and digital crossovers and multi-amping for a couple decades now. The home Hi Fi industry is decades behind - except for McIntosh
Loving the t-shirt! I was at my local dealer they day after they had unboxed them. I wasn't aware until my friend audio consultant/sales person said ...come see this. There they were, two behemoths all fired up and connected to Sonus Faber. Not just beautiful, but ear-gasm like. It was ten minutes of unaffordable bliss!
Multipass
The Law of Diminishing Returns is unassailable; the question is simply *where* it kicks in. Steve goes on the record here to say that the threshold is north of $100k.
The MC901 brings to mind the quote from the Simpsons where Homer orders dinner at a fancy restaurant: “I want your best dish stuffed with your second best dish.”
It depends on the component. With power amps, I had a $1700 Proceed AMP 2. I borrowed a $6000 Mark Levinson amp as well as a $5500 Audio Research tube hybrid amp for a weekend back in 2000. I couldn't hear a difference so didn't bother upgrading. However, speakers are a totally different matter as they interact with the room. Changing electronic components is one thing. Changing physical components is another.
Steve is right about the really expensive stuff, but whether it's worth it to you is another question. I have heard these systems, I could afford one, but I don't own one. Maybe I'm not really an audiophile?
Agree, with high power , the crest factor permits no compression of dynamics , if the coils can take the heath...a direkt radiating system can sound effortless like horns if it can deliver without compression and clipping of amps...give me a 95db/w system and 100 watts and it delivers uncompressed a steinway full power real life sounding...even kef k300 p60 speakers can do 113db
I can't find your 2020 summary. Did you remove it??
It was helpful
Not sure what you’re referring to, but I don’t think I’ve removed anything in quite a long time
@@SteveGuttenbergAudiophiliac ok, sorry
It was the best buys of the year. A Pioneer amp that I can't remember
He reached new heights of oral ecstasy in this room. I've been to places like that too, mostly in SE Asia...
Pretty sure Steve meant 'aural ecstacy' there, bud. ~_^
@@Hare_deLune You never know what else went down thete. Maybe he did mean "Oral." 😂
Oral ecstasy?? Lmao
Lol
160,000 (!) - just WOW!
Back to toppic: maybe kind of overkill?
Not shure.
And please keep in mind: binaural head recording was developed (in Germany, btw) for headphones! Not for LS!
Great video Steve. I've heard a few HighEnd Sysyems and totally agree. One, with the Continuum Turntable, I couldnt explain it. It was that good.
I know a dealer who demoed this system. His client was sold!! 😃
I hope to hear it, post Covid.
I was gobsmacked by the price.
I wonder how the McIntosh Townhouse compares to the VPI House. I’m guessing a house is larger than a townhouse especially with real estate prices in New York. But the townhouse looks pretty posh. McIntosh was the first audiophile brand I ever heard of. I had a school friend in the 70s with a customer on his paper route who was an audiophile and would invite him in to listen to his system. We weren’t even teenagers at the time and my friend would always rave about the McIntosh gear he had heard. And the brand has always stuck in my head although I’ve never owned any of it.
If you hook up McIntosh gear to an oscilloscope, you see an almost perfect curve. About as close as you can get. The walk the walk and talk the talk.
You can do that with almost all amps cause oscilloscope is not test gear that shows amp quality, or signal content on output.
Okay, this might seem a bit unrelated, but what's the difference between "gobsmacked" and "flabbergasted"?
I don't believe that "flabbergasted" was uttered in the original Charlie and the Chocolate Factory.
@@RichardDurishin I don't get that.
they are both one realm above bowled over but flabbergasted usually contains an element of befuddlement.
@@petekutheis3822 Interesting.
I love this conversation. 😆
I'd love to see a comparison review of Macintosh versus Audio Research
I have a McIntosh 2105 power amp and AR90 speakers. Love them both.
Love has A price.
Impressive, I am a McIntosh guy! C2700 preamp & MC 312 amp! Really fine sound & build quality is unmatched!
Cool. Thinking about getting a MC312 for a pair of 702S2
best episode in a long time.... more McIntosh content please!
I always associate McIntosh with the Grateful Dead. They used something like 50 McIntosh MC2300 amps to power their madness.
Are you saying the sound/tone of Jerry's guitar was run thru a McIntosh ? I always thought it was unique sounding.
@Kurt Diamond Bob Weir continues the tradition, at least at home, with a full McIntosh stereo system. DeadMacs live.
@@mondoenterprises6710 Jerry used a 50 watters and a stereo fender twin preamp....he ran a lot of his effects through a loop on the guitar. Its almost the les paul approach to ultra clean guitar tone. Not that I was just looking at that last night...lol
I'm surprised you didn't give the full house tour.
If you want to go beyond 901s get 2301s and 611s with a men220 ,more control of the amplifiers than 901crossover add a c22v5 or C1100 and mp1100 and you have true Mc vinyl setup
Have you done this? I thought about doing this since I have 611 but concerned I may be overloading the tube amplifier transformer. The men220 may be good but seems really inconvenient and not sure about tonal issues and matching amp as well as 901 does it. Too bad men220 is only two channel.
It would be great to see more McIntosh reviews on the channel.
One is coming very soon.
@@SteveGuttenbergAudiophiliac thank you, it's always a pleasure to watch a new video.
McIntosh is universal.
Imagine these amps with Snell Illusion speakers
Why use binaural recordings to audition a speaker system? Don't binaural recordings only sound "correct" over headphones?
I am glad you had a great time Steve. Thanks come swinging by.
Joshua,
The WOM Townhouse is one of NYC's greatest attractions! You, Franz, David, and Sammy do a remarkable job -- along with all other staff members. Last February, prior to the pandemic, I was in NYC for two concerts. I spent the entire afternoon of Friday, February 21st, at WOM with two friends and our fantastic host, Franz. I can't wait for normalcy again, so I can fly back up to NYC and revisit your hidden jewel.
@@allenfields9058 thank you buddy!
Will be buying this system as soon as I hit the Lotto!
My McIntosh 611 monoblocs and Serafino speakers like little kids compared to 901 etc. In any event I love my system even if its half the cost of this one. Of course the sound is better with more expensive systems. I aspire to step up in the next few years to improve the music where I live. Steve I have listened to you for long time and I finally subscribed and will support your efforts love your sincerity. Chilling now and listening to Cassandra Wilson's "Glamoured album" it makes the Serafino speakers sound even better and the scotch helps!.
That was fun Steve. I enjoy these types of videos
As Steve mentioned; at this price the setup needs to be comparable as well. This is not something you just throw in a corner of the dining room.
I'm listening to this on a phone speaker. Sounds amazing.
Would have been nice to have single mic listening position recording w a couple mins of playback. As unlikely as that is to show capability, still would be nice.
Excellent "impressions" presentation nonetheless!
Thanks for taking the time to experience it and share.
Glad to see your talking about McIntosh Steve. From one of our interactions I was convinced that you and the New York area (and most of the U.S.) didn't care for McIntosh. Yes, I really like that new MC901, but like most people I can't afford them. Still, a very nice piece. I figure by the time they hit the used market and I can afford them I'll be dead or too old to enjoy them. Considering I'm in my early 60s now. LOL! 🤣...just trying to keep my sense of humor...
I only heard of McIntosh a couple weeks ago, I thought someone was talking about the computers. I've sort of been into audio for years and never heard of them. Maybe it is because I'm in UK.
Thanks Steve for sharing your enthralling musical audible hi-fi moments with us ,,we can feel you..
I would have been blown away if you started playing "devil with a blue dress on"
The pro sound and studio monitoring / mixing industries have been using DSP and digital crossovers and multi-amping for a couple decades now. The home Hi Fi industry is decades behind - except for Mac.
Try listening to a fully active Legacy Audio Aeris with Wavelet system. Digital pre-amp with tone control, room correction, and active crossover in the digital realm. The Aeris is also used for mastering in the pro audio community. Mixing tends to be near field with monitors.
@@matthewbarrow3727 - I have biamped Klipsch Jubilees with a Xilica XP 4080 DSP in my listening room.
@@petersouthernboy6327 I have tri-amped Legacy Audio Aeris speakers with Wavelet preamp. A 500 watt module for each of the 2 subwoofers, a 325 watt module for the midrange and mid woofer, and a 325 watt module for the tweeter and super tweeter. ie. 4 internal power amp modules for each speaker. The speakers are voiced with each other. This allows for very solid imaging, where the instruments take up specific locations and space within the sound stage, and where you can hear a quiet sound which is 2 feet away from a loud sound in the sound stage. The system recreates the sound stage that is in the recording. Hearing the sound stage change in the middle of a track is something that can be quite magical. I guess that it is easier to imagine if you use a mixing work station, where you have some tracks with small room reverb, and other tracks with large room reverb. Start with small room reverb tracks, then add in the large room reverb, and the listening room size seems to grow with the music. With most systems, you won't get this experience of the room feeling like it is changing in size. It is certainly just an illusion, but the strength of the illusion is what makes the difference.
I never understood how one can buy a product where you could manually set the crossover point "to your taste", or at least adjust it. people always talk about "being as true to the master recording" as possible, yet they fiddle around with these things and color the sound beyond what a tube amp already colors - yes, people speak of the "warm" sound. It's coloration. true to the master means neutral - not coloring the sound.
I like that type of recording techinck. Truely what a person hears in the purest form!
Only if you listen with headphones...
I’m gobsmacked by the damn price
Steve:
How was the 1st watt??
So, hundreds of watts are required to make a dynamic speaker project like horns? Interesting 🤓
Your crossover experiment parallels what budget systems do with subs.
Listening to DUB on an EL34 amp right now with REL powered subs and DSPeaker room correction. I'm 😊 as long as I don't wake the Mrs
I need 5 of those amps for my home theatre system. I'll be right back; let me ask my wife if we can take out a 2nd mortagage
You do got an awesome kickass job Steve.... But youve earned it! This vid has left me with so many questions. McIntosh Townhouse?? In Manhattan? What?? Where?? How long has it been there!?!?! Why no Mac speakers in there?
As far as 100k setups being that marginally better; of course it will be if your using same brand components all the way through! ESPECIALLY MCINTOSH! That still doesnt quell the fact you can make $25k sound pretty damn close to $100k if you have the street smarts & experience. Its not gonna be all new unused gear of course, but it can be done!
Ok, I found where it is, makes sense to me now : ) There was once a Bang & Olufsen as well as a Bose flagship store in that general vicinity at one point too.
What a dream system beautifully setup to. If I only had the right bank account for that
Being into loudness is a choice. A type of lustening. And being into realistic staging is another thing. Difficult to be into both simultaneously...they are conceptually incompatible.
Man, I'll bet that was so much fun!
Ask if you can borrow it home :-)