Topaz Photo AI Review - Test and Compared against Gigapixel 8

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 20 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 11

  • @sounderdavis5446
    @sounderdavis5446 6 дней назад +1

    Outstanding comparative review, Richard, and your experiences match mine. Only with the current version 3 of Photo AI, in my opinion, have Topaz Labs finally caught up and surpassed the performance of their earlier standalone apps, Sharpen AI and DeNoise AI, that they discontinued developing 1-2 years ago to concentrate on Photo AI. So older Sharpen AI and DeNoise AI licensees might want to take another look and trial Photo AI 3.

    • @silentpeakphoto1845
      @silentpeakphoto1845  6 дней назад

      Thanks for dropping by Sound. You should. I'm still not sure how much better Topaz Photo AI is over Sharpen, Denoise, and Gigapixel in terms of image quality, but having all these features under one roof is the reason why I never go back to them. Come to think of it, I remember the Automatic modes in the standalone apps were not that great. Manual adjustments were almost necessary.

  • @danthadon87
    @danthadon87 3 дня назад

    What are the min MacBook chip and ram requirements for upscaling?

    • @silentpeakphoto1845
      @silentpeakphoto1845  Час назад

      Hi there. Check out docs.topazlabs.com/photo-ai/system-requirements

  • @kornelnyp
    @kornelnyp 4 дня назад

    Great video!

  • @martinlennon4673
    @martinlennon4673 6 дней назад

    Excellent overview 👍

  • @dimabelan388
    @dimabelan388 5 дней назад

    I have MacBook Pro 16gb ram, 1m pro, 1tb and it’s take forever to use super focus even if I do mask just on face 😬

    • @Kratos30000
      @Kratos30000 4 дня назад +1

      Dang. I got the same setup. So you need a dedicated GPU

    • @silentpeakphoto1845
      @silentpeakphoto1845  3 дня назад

      My dedicated GPU only runs at about 19% during super focus. It seems to hit the CPU harder.