The leftover clay in the second short film CAN be a baby, but it can also be a never solved issue between a couple, like a mistake, an affair, anything that makes couples argue. That's the beauty of not giving it a clear form. Anything that "touches" the feelings in a couple, if not properly talked or solved can destroy the most passionate of relationships or easily turn love in rage
I thought it could also be a characteristic of one (or both) of them that they didn't want (or really didn't see on themselves) to admit, so they kept projecting it to one another
I don't think it's a baby, that's too specific, and i also don't believe it's an unresolved issue because it wasn't present prior to their union, though of course it's all subjective. To me it represents a growing romantic feeling between the two that formed after sex, but which neither of them accepted which then lead to the collapse of the relationship.
I think the third one is about two men could provide what each other needs and make a good conversation, but when at bad angles and with misunderstandings, conversations turn into arguments. And when they both stick to one same stuff, they are not helping each other, but destroying. A good way to see how conflicts happen.
for some reason the objects being broken down the first two times makes me sad, until the pieces dont resemble anything, then it doesnt make me sad anymore
Translations for those who care: 0:00 - Dimensions of Dialogue (I would personally translate it as "Dialogue options" though) 0:34 - Everlasting/Eternal Dialogue 5:01 - Passionate Dialogue 7:52 - Tiresome/Grueling Dialogue
I remember stumbling upon this film at the Tate Modern almost twenty years ago. They had it playing on loop in a small open-access booth. It was easily one of the most horrifying yet mesmerising experiences of my late childhood. Good stuff.
I feel the eternal dialogue is a representation of the three pillars of being : body, mind and spirit. The body being the tools and cutlery, the books and pencils being the mind and finally the food and plants being the spirit. All in conflict but one and the same, eternally intertwined in our existence. Or I could be VERY high right now?
Thank you, fascinating idea. I thought it may have a somewhat more sociological or historical reference, the different heads representing the social spheres of farming, technology and administration or academia, but I actually never pursued that idea further trying to fathom whether there might be a certain underlying philosophy of history such as Marxism that is to be illustrated in that way. Why should the different spheres or classes be devouring and digesting one another? Your take on it may give an explanation, since the different aspects cannot exist without the others, they depend or even "feed" on one another, as the philosopher Kant put it: "Reason without perception is empty, perception without reason is blind".
I mean at least the beginning could support the historical interpretation showing the succession of societies dominated by 1. farming, 2. manufacturing and finally 3. the service industry. As it goes on, your more anthropological interpretation could come into play nicely: Only when body, soul and mind are intertwined indistinguishably, we turn into real humans. But I'm sure there are plenty of other possibilities. (I haven't read all the comments here.) What do the other viewers here on RUclips think? Oh, and I have just found a quotation by Jan Svankmajer himself: The figures "act out, in condensed form, the process which we are witnessing at this particular stage of civilisation: The passage from differentiation to uniformity". (quoted acc. to a film review by Prof Julian Petley, republished in: Jan Svankmajer, The Complete Short Films, booklet, p. 27, published in the UK by BFI) J. Petley goes on to say: "Taken as a whole, the three 'dialogues' bear witness to humankind's intolerance of otherness, the habitual, the non-conformist and the unexpected. Only in the opening section of the second dialogue is there any real communication, as the two bodies sensuously intermingle in an ecstasy of oneness." (ibid.)
Hey, even then, I immediately connect it to the id, the ego, and the superego. The id is the inherent requirements and demands to survive - the food. The ego is what handles this demand in a way that is acceptable - filtering the id. That's the tools and cutlery that skin the vegetables and the like. The superego is then that which holds ideals, judgment, understanding, and intelligence, and is represented by the books and tools used in the pursuit of knowledge. All of these three elements of Freud's analysis of personality are said to work together, but functionally, they are counteracting one another and competing for the most active presence at any given time. This is that eternal conflict.
I think the first one is about cycle of abuse. One is the parent and one is the child. The parent is either abusive or very strict, they ruin and “mold” the child into a different person. Said child grows up and does the same to their child, and so on, continuing the cycle. At one point someone attempts to overcome the generational trauma (the first human looking clay) and tries to be a good parent to their child, although not without flaws. Their child grows up and tries to better themselves, and so on. Which is why at the end the new generations no longer bite and fight each other.
This short got me where I am today. Did a little video about it for a media project, which led me into studying animation. Though I moved onto regular film studies, I wouldn't be where I am if I didn't report on this weird little masterpiece.
My art teacher in high school (she knew i was into weird stuff) lent me a PAL tape of this and several other shorts and that was my introduction to Svankmajer. I immediately made a copy in video tech class but it was a little rough because I recorded it in NTSC mode.
That whole 3 mintue part cracked me up, idk why. Is it the serious faces with silly sounds and combination of items containing a deeper metaphor than my brain can comprehend?
@@retteketette It's about dialogue. If two ideas combine well, the discussion flows rightly, and if they're too disparate or simmilar, the conversation turns chaotic. It's just a funny gag about this idea.
My own theories (I have no idea tho) #1. The first one was them being unique individuals and then one person made fun of one person and so on until they werent unique at all anymore. #2. The second seemed like they wanted to have sex but then a baby came and neither of them wanted to take care of the baby. So they started getting stressed and taking it out on each other. #3. The third one seemed like they're conversing and it's going good until something switched and then the conversation wasn't the vibes no more And they started arguing
1. Looks more like people turning from one-dimensional sets of ideas (like the one obsessed with books and science I guess) into the complex individuals through sharing ideas and sometimes destroying what they thought about the world earlier
2. Or it could be not a baby but some problem or an unresolved issue between them. And both started ignoring it or shifting the blame to the other. Until it became unbearable and both of them started to beat it into another one until they both had destroyed each other 3. Yeah, thought something like that too. And the conversation started going south until they could not just share the ideas because they both talked about something completely different, that's why there were shoelaces on the pasta etc. And it led to them arguing, even though they both were really similar/had similar ideas, that's why they both took out toothbrushes. And in the end they both were exhausted and destroyed
@@romanscerbak5167 yeah but, theyre not gaining any new mass in the first one, theyre just getting destilled into mush from what they started with. I like your interpretation, but it doesnt really apply imo.
I love most of Svankmajer's short films, this is one of his best. "Darkness/Light/Darkness" is also great. Being done with film gives it that unique appearance that digital can't quite seem to capture.
The first 0:34 shows the decline of individuality. We see each section as a different person with a different make-up. Constantly grinding away by meshing with those that they do not mesh well with. We start as individuals and what happens we lose that? We lose our features and what makes us unique. The second 5:01 is a decline of family after we lose our individual features. How can this child be mine? No one wants this, etc etc. There is more here than what we can be seen. It starts with no one wanting the child that which is a creation of love resulted in a anger and fighting. We see how our lack of individuality creates something neither of us want to accept or bring into our lives. After all, how can we be sure that this thing is mine and not his? I cannot tell. The third 7:52 is what happens to society. Instead of working together we get our methods and ideals mixed up. What worked together as each person was different is slowly eroded away as people who worked in society lost their individuality and as a result lost what they did expecting everyone to be the same, work the same, and do the same does not make a healthy society. This film can be interpreted in so many ways. We can view life through this as well. Of course this was made in Soviet Russia I believe when Russians were trying to create one unique culture. This can be seen today with globalism. The idea of one massive culture. one demographic, no race, no culture, no nothing. Just human. Works on paper, but if we lose what makes us us. What do we ultimately have? Chaos and exhaustion.
professor: So, what do you think the artists is trying to tell us? students: dont do drugs.. just... dont! jokes aside, please take a moment to appreciated the immense amount of work and effort this 11 min. insanity has taken to produce!
i really thought that i could find normal people like me in comments but i guess that it´s imposible because i really thought that you were the chosen one of the profecy but NO
Exactly what I was thinking, which is funny because a common theme in The Division Bell is communication. It doesnt seem far fetched but I couldn't find any obvious proof.
The process of editing in his movies was so fucking hard that they need the help of the geniuses of stanley kubrick .... Jan svankmajer is so fucking good
5:03 At this point, it is a phenomenon that occurs as a result of momentary pleasure and the inability to accept the consequences that a mistake made may have later. Afterwards, we can see that people deviated from this path and held a great grudge against each other. 7:57 At this point, we witness that everything turns into garbage. While everything is progressing in peace and happiness, they turn everything into conflict as a result of a meaningless conflict, but they do this within the framework of their own potential, without being influenced by anything. and this opposition wears people out more than necessary.
@@nambu1306 the first part, three social group, villagers, laborers, the educated. Laborers wins the dialogue against villagers but the educated always get shaped by villagers (cause only way to convey your message to villagers, lowest class, to educate them), besides a dialogue can be created between laborers and the educated, so that the educated win dialogue against laborer. Over time, the lowest class, villagers shape the society, just follow the order of eating, the educated disappear, eventually only villagers shaped by laborers and laborers shaped by the educated are left, later villagers has to say. Only way of a complete dialogue is to educate the lowest class, this will create a medium for dialogue. the second part, the couple don't accept a binary part which belongs to the both, eventually they can't find a way of dialogue and rip themselves off. The third part, to achieve correct dialogue you have to follow right order of argument in any conversation, dialogue is only achieved if other side pays attention to the messenger, listens to the messenger.
I feel like this is related to evolution in some way. Like eternal dialogue is microorganisms consuming eachother and reproduceing through that means. Passionate dialogue could be the first couple to have a child in the way we know it to be and since their the first ones they dont know how to deal with it. The last one could be 2 men trying to barter but getting infuriated by the supplies of the others and destroy eachothers supplies thereby starving themselves. Tell me what you think
The leftover clay in the second short film CAN be a baby, but it can also be a never solved issue between a couple, like a mistake, an affair, anything that makes couples argue. That's the beauty of not giving it a clear form. Anything that "touches" the feelings in a couple, if not properly talked or solved can destroy the most passionate of relationships or easily turn love in rage
Well said.
I think it's just the leftover jizz. That stuff can be a pain to clean up.
I thought it could also be a characteristic of one (or both) of them that they didn't want (or really didn't see on themselves) to admit, so they kept projecting it to one another
Kids are the reason parents divorce
I don't think it's a baby, that's too specific, and i also don't believe it's an unresolved issue because it wasn't present prior to their union, though of course it's all subjective.
To me it represents a growing romantic feeling between the two that formed after sex, but which neither of them accepted which then lead to the collapse of the relationship.
I think the third one is about two men could provide what each other needs and make a good conversation, but when at bad angles and with misunderstandings, conversations turn into arguments. And when they both stick to one same stuff, they are not helping each other, but destroying. A good way to see how conflicts happen.
Man, there is just something so oddly satisfying about the objects being broken down creating each new head in the first sequence.
Yeah
for some reason the objects being broken down the first two times makes me sad, until the pieces dont resemble anything, then it doesnt make me sad anymore
Translations for those who care:
0:00 - Dimensions of Dialogue (I would personally translate it as "Dialogue options" though)
0:34 - Everlasting/Eternal Dialogue
5:01 - Passionate Dialogue
7:52 - Tiresome/Grueling Dialogue
You are wrong. 0:34 is Factual (or objective) Dialogue. "věcný" is "factual", "eternal" would be "věčný"
Yes, the first part is “objective dialogue”, and the third one is “exhaustive dialogue”.
I remember stumbling upon this film at the Tate Modern almost twenty years ago. They had it playing on loop in a small open-access booth. It was easily one of the most horrifying yet mesmerising experiences of my late childhood. Good stuff.
To build a time machine and go back 20 years! What a wonderful time that was. Sigh.
I feel the eternal dialogue is a representation of the three pillars of being : body, mind and spirit. The body being the tools and cutlery, the books and pencils being the mind and finally the food and plants being the spirit. All in conflict but one and the same, eternally intertwined in our existence. Or I could be VERY high right now?
Thank you, fascinating idea.
I thought it may have a somewhat more sociological or historical reference, the different heads representing the social spheres of farming, technology and administration or academia, but I actually never pursued that idea further trying to fathom whether there might be a certain underlying philosophy of history such as Marxism that is to be illustrated in that way. Why should the different spheres or classes be devouring and digesting one another?
Your take on it may give an explanation, since the different aspects cannot exist without the others, they depend or even "feed" on one another, as the philosopher Kant put it: "Reason without perception is empty, perception without reason is blind".
I mean at least the beginning could support the historical interpretation showing the succession of societies dominated by 1. farming, 2. manufacturing and finally 3. the service industry.
As it goes on, your more anthropological interpretation could come into play nicely: Only when body, soul and mind are intertwined indistinguishably, we turn into real humans.
But I'm sure there are plenty of other possibilities. (I haven't read all the comments here.)
What do the other viewers here on RUclips think?
Oh, and I have just found a quotation by Jan Svankmajer himself:
The figures "act out, in condensed form, the process which we are witnessing at this particular stage of civilisation: The passage from differentiation to uniformity".
(quoted acc. to a film review by Prof Julian Petley, republished in: Jan Svankmajer, The Complete Short Films, booklet, p. 27, published in the UK by BFI)
J. Petley goes on to say: "Taken as a whole, the three 'dialogues' bear witness to humankind's intolerance of otherness, the habitual, the non-conformist and the unexpected. Only in the opening section of the second dialogue is there any real communication, as the two bodies sensuously intermingle in an ecstasy of oneness." (ibid.)
"Or I could be VERY high right now?"
Jan would be proud (I assume)
Why is istruments the body and not the produce?
Hey, even then, I immediately connect it to the id, the ego, and the superego. The id is the inherent requirements and demands to survive - the food. The ego is what handles this demand in a way that is acceptable - filtering the id. That's the tools and cutlery that skin the vegetables and the like. The superego is then that which holds ideals, judgment, understanding, and intelligence, and is represented by the books and tools used in the pursuit of knowledge. All of these three elements of Freud's analysis of personality are said to work together, but functionally, they are counteracting one another and competing for the most active presence at any given time. This is that eternal conflict.
Normal people: "Butter your toast. Tie your shoes. Sharpen your pencil."
Jan Švankmajer: "Butter your shoes. Tie your pencil. Sharpen your toast."
"normal"
So abstract and simple. I love it
estas como una cabra en celo bro
Simple nay
The ending of this film predicted arguing on the internet so accurately I think Jan may have had a time machine.
I have never been more happy to be recommended anything by anyone, this is amazing
I think the first one is about cycle of abuse. One is the parent and one is the child. The parent is either abusive or very strict, they ruin and “mold” the child into a different person. Said child grows up and does the same to their child, and so on, continuing the cycle. At one point someone attempts to overcome the generational trauma (the first human looking clay) and tries to be a good parent to their child, although not without flaws. Their child grows up and tries to better themselves, and so on. Which is why at the end the new generations no longer bite and fight each other.
I really like this theory
This short got me where I am today. Did a little video about it for a media project, which led me into studying animation. Though I moved onto regular film studies, I wouldn't be where I am if I didn't report on this weird little masterpiece.
Where do you study? :)
@@mepchou8314 Northampton
The things you can do without CGI...
My art teacher in high school (she knew i was into weird stuff) lent me a PAL tape of this and several other shorts and that was my introduction to Svankmajer. I immediately made a copy in video tech class but it was a little rough because I recorded it in NTSC mode.
this is just an interpretation of rock paper scissors
smokeythepandit meat paper metal
@@TheF0xskibidbopmmdada food, paper, metal
Show Pencil Toast
“Chewed up and spat out”
Thank you James, so far this has been a surreal experience.
The nerd was right.
Yes he was
Amazing
Praise to the nerd
@@jordanswenson8506 all praise James Rolfe
*the fucking nerd
No siempre se puede proponer lo mismo, hay que saber conocer personas y aprender usar... Las herramientas para cada una de las inquietudes.
Hasta que por fin encuentro a alguien que habla mi idioma :n
@@jesusespejou8176 también lo estuve buscando ^^
Mm yes I like buttering my shoe and sharpening my bread.
Absouletely morbid and horrifying
10/10
This is the most disturbing masterpiece i've ever seen xD
Amazing animation with deeper meaning :)
the only one deeper meaning is: my but is broken by the giant logic in this video
For some reason, the toothpaste being squirted on the wrong corresponding item always cracks my shit up.
It's not even that funny.
That whole 3 mintue part cracked me up, idk why. Is it the serious faces with silly sounds and combination of items containing a deeper metaphor than my brain can comprehend?
..........
@@retteketette It's about dialogue. If two ideas combine well, the discussion flows rightly, and if they're too disparate or simmilar, the conversation turns chaotic. It's just a funny gag about this idea.
Got to see this in 35mm yesterday... STUNNING visuals, INTRICATE sound design, & BREATHTAKING imagination.
My own theories (I have no idea tho) #1. The first one was them being unique individuals and then one person made fun of one person and so on until they werent unique at all anymore.
#2. The second seemed like they wanted to have sex but then a baby came and neither of them wanted to take care of the baby. So they started getting stressed and taking it out on each other.
#3. The third one seemed like they're conversing and it's going good until something switched and then the conversation wasn't the vibes no more And they started arguing
1. Didn't think that at all
2. Exactly what I was thinking
3. Huh. Thought it was something to do with going senile
1. Looks more like people turning from one-dimensional sets of ideas (like the one obsessed with books and science I guess) into the complex individuals through sharing ideas and sometimes destroying what they thought about the world earlier
2. Or it could be not a baby but some problem or an unresolved issue between them. And both started ignoring it or shifting the blame to the other. Until it became unbearable and both of them started to beat it into another one until they both had destroyed each other
3. Yeah, thought something like that too. And the conversation started going south until they could not just share the ideas because they both talked about something completely different, that's why there were shoelaces on the pasta etc. And it led to them arguing, even though they both were really similar/had similar ideas, that's why they both took out toothbrushes. And in the end they both were exhausted and destroyed
Damn this shit actually makes sense though
@@romanscerbak5167 yeah but, theyre not gaining any new mass in the first one, theyre just getting destilled into mush from what they started with. I like your interpretation, but it doesnt really apply imo.
Jan Švankmajer, what an artist.
That poor clay baby
I love most of Svankmajer's short films, this is one of his best. "Darkness/Light/Darkness" is also great. Being done with film gives it that unique appearance that digital can't quite seem to capture.
The first 0:34 shows the decline of individuality. We see each section as a different person with a different make-up. Constantly grinding away by meshing with those that they do not mesh well with. We start as individuals and what happens we lose that? We lose our features and what makes us unique.
The second 5:01 is a decline of family after we lose our individual features. How can this child be mine? No one wants this, etc etc. There is more here than what we can be seen. It starts with no one wanting the child that which is a creation of love resulted in a anger and fighting. We see how our lack of individuality creates something neither of us want to accept or bring into our lives. After all, how can we be sure that this thing is mine and not his? I cannot tell.
The third 7:52 is what happens to society. Instead of working together we get our methods and ideals mixed up. What worked together as each person was different is slowly eroded away as people who worked in society lost their individuality and as a result lost what they did expecting everyone to be the same, work the same, and do the same does not make a healthy society.
This film can be interpreted in so many ways. We can view life through this as well. Of course this was made in Soviet Russia I believe when Russians were trying to create one unique culture. This can be seen today with globalism. The idea of one massive culture. one demographic, no race, no culture, no nothing. Just human.
Works on paper, but if we lose what makes us us. What do we ultimately have? Chaos and exhaustion.
This is the truly masterpiece. Definitely.
A brilliant piece of art!
Thanks a ton, uploader.
Couldn't take my eyes of this art for a second. Good recommendation James!
i admire the autors creativity and his way to showing hassle in human race
I like how a piece of paper can destroy steel 😂😂😂
Time code
Wow I frickin loved this, also I should probably see a psychologist.
I've been clean for years, but this is your brain on day four or five of a meth run.
I like the one where it starts out making sense,and then it goes chaotic overtime
Second one was definitely a condom commercial
how
ALJAHSJAPAPAPJAHAHAHAHHAH
How did you know?
that shit was kinda dark, they were in love had sex then had a kid and neglected it and killed each other out of hatred for one another
"Nada se cria, tudo se transforma." Seres inanimados animando-se incessantemente, ininterruptamente.
I have been looking for this for the longest goddamn time.
professor: So, what do you think the artists is trying to tell us?
students: dont do drugs.. just... dont!
jokes aside, please take a moment to appreciated the immense amount of work and effort this 11 min. insanity has taken to produce!
i really thought that i could find normal people like me in comments but i guess that it´s imposible because i really thought that you were the chosen one of the profecy but NO
I’ve been trying to find this video for 7 years
Division Bell cover? Anyway, thanks James Rolfe!
Exactly what I was thinking, which is funny because a common theme in The Division Bell is communication. It doesnt seem far fetched but I couldn't find any obvious proof.
The process of editing in his movies was so fucking hard that they need the help of the geniuses of stanley kubrick .... Jan svankmajer is so fucking good
One of the most important animators ever.
5:03 At this point, it is a phenomenon that occurs as a result of momentary pleasure and the inability to accept the consequences that a mistake made may have later. Afterwards, we can see that people deviated from this path and held a great grudge against each other.
7:57 At this point, we witness that everything turns into garbage. While everything is progressing in peace and happiness, they turn everything into conflict as a result of a meaningless conflict, but they do this within the framework of their own potential, without being influenced by anything. and this opposition wears people out more than necessary.
The shoelace into that bread was oddly satisfying. My bun's spiffy outchea
Combination To Inspiration Transformation 💪👑🖤🧡💜💗🟧🟪🈳️🟠🟣♀️👹🧬😈🇺🇲🇯🇵
I literally can't.
I don't want to go through this again
the message Jan Švankmajer tries to convey is really powerful, this is how modern societies get shaped.
what is the idea?
@@nambu1306 the first part, three social group, villagers, laborers, the educated.
Laborers wins the dialogue against villagers but the educated always get shaped by villagers (cause only way to convey your message to villagers, lowest class, to educate them), besides a dialogue can be created between laborers and the educated, so that the educated win dialogue against laborer.
Over time, the lowest class, villagers shape the society, just follow the order of eating, the educated disappear, eventually only villagers shaped by laborers and laborers shaped by the educated are left, later villagers has to say.
Only way of a complete dialogue is to educate the lowest class, this will create a medium for dialogue.
the second part, the couple don't accept a binary part which belongs to the both, eventually they can't find a way of dialogue and rip themselves off.
The third part, to achieve correct dialogue you have to follow right order of argument in any conversation, dialogue is only achieved if other side pays attention to the messenger, listens to the messenger.
That certainly made me feel... something.
i saw this when i was very very little. confused me and left a mystery in my head for so long, a strange and vague memory.
can never get enough of this one
It’s been 4 minutes when I feel like I’ve been watching for 5 hours
THIS is one long breakfast cereal commercial!
Yeah
Does anyone feel like this was the only video "How to Basic" guy was allowed to watch as a child?
I thought of "How To Basic" the moment i saw this
AVGN crew enters the stage!
Rock, paper, *_GUN!_*
Me: I pick paper. Paper beats gun, because gun is metal. I win.
What about Roses?
Clay
Τρελό, γαμάτο, ενδιαφέρον και βαρετό σαν εμένα και τη κοινωνική μου ζωή!
Thanks. The Dimensions of Dialogue remind me of the paintings of Giuseppe Arcimbaldo from the 1500s.
YES we get it. You came from AVGN. You are very special and unique. Jesus
I came from the rateyourmusic film charts, so take that!
Thank you James Rolfe.
I definitely first saw this in my CoD animation class this year
9:48
Are you watching Netflix?
Someone’s Daughter:
GOT YOU FAM 5:34
Rare uncensored footage of odo linking with the female changeling at 5:25.
This is incredible❤
The last one is just an intense game of rock paper scissors
Rock Paper Scissors -> clay
this blow my mind
"The one whose concern is with that which enters the belly will discover that his value is found in that which goes out of it"
this gotta be the weirdest game of rock paper scissors ive ever seen
This is really, really bizarre
This is really cool all in all but at the same time this really did make my skin crawl
and made me it at the same time!!!!
they say he's a surrealist, but to me this is more real than anything
Awesome love it ‼️
The last bit speaks to the fragility of principals. Perspective and relativity...
Pure art
Idk, but the part where two pencils break is satisfying to hear and look at ( 10:45 )
I feel like this is related to evolution in some way. Like eternal dialogue is microorganisms consuming eachother and reproduceing through that means. Passionate dialogue could be the first couple to have a child in the way we know it to be and since their the first ones they dont know how to deal with it. The last one could be 2 men trying to barter but getting infuriated by the supplies of the others and destroy eachothers supplies thereby starving themselves. Tell me what you think
I showed this to my mom and she said it was clay porn. lol
could be like xD
6:00 And I though that Japanese animated porn was weird and creepy.
Möhinder Pictures my motto: never trust anyone with an anime avatar
To me that looked like rape rather than porn
@@99xara99 for me I think it looks like Venom
This is the best way to explain rock, paper, scissors
i love this so much
More than a touch of Arcimboldo in the figures created
What *RUclips* recommends at *3 AM* 💀
Мульт огонь . Привет с Владивостока
These films have a school house rock vibe to them.
Kinda see what you mean
Tentativo di traduzione italiana:
“POSSIBILITÀ DI DIALOGO”
“dialogo oggettivo”
“dialogo passionato”
“dialogo esauriente”
Road to nowhere (Talking heads) comments > Sledgehammer (Peter Gabriel) comments > and that's why now i'm here. 😲
This is the best battle royal game ever
lol those scissors were going to town on that apple
these are oddly frustrating to watch idk. but I love em
I saw this in an art gallery in Prague Castle.
That relatable moment when you butter your pencil
Thank you James!!!
unbelievable.
I fell down RUclips's rabbit hole and found Dada!
Dialogue 2 is by far the best, imo
Reminds me of the Schism music video
Never lend out any of your tools
What the fuck did I just watch??
Nope.
This is a freaking fever dream on steroids.
I think I prefer mathematics
What?
😂😂😂
4:46 Vomit sequence makes me laugh!🤣🤣🤣🤣