my guess Raflikk probably went for faster riskier strats, that despite dying saved time, since the bounty was for deathless + beating WR at the time, Danicker had less of an incentive to go for the riskier strats used in this run I consider both runs EXTREMELY impressive in different ways, personally
![[FWR] The World's Hardest Game 3 in 29:04](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/R849T29QqIw/mqdefault.jpg)
![[FWR] The World's Hardest Game 3 in 29:04](/img/tr.png)
![[FWR] The World's Hardest Game 4 in 27:27](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IgZ4pCX3n5M/mqdefault.jpg)
![[Former WR] The World's Hardest Game 3 Level 5 in 12:31 (0 Deaths)](/img/1.gif)
7 more deaths and still faster than Danicker? Raflikk is just too good.
my guess Raflikk probably went for faster riskier strats, that despite dying saved time, since the bounty was for deathless + beating WR at the time, Danicker had less of an incentive to go for the riskier strats used in this run
I consider both runs EXTREMELY impressive in different ways, personally
@@fruity2 yeah. On discord I said raflikk should get a deathless run he said he wasn't interested and wanted wr slash pb more
Destroy that game man!!!!!!!! YES!!!!!!!!
1 man 1 keyboard
Hacker real!!!!!! Lol
Don’t take this seriously it’s just a joke