NEW IWC Aquatimer - Is It Any Good?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 13 авг 2022
  • IWC's latest Aquatimer came in and I had to review it, I don't think people know enough about IWC's diving watches. Enjoy!
    Shop now for all IWC Watches: www.chisholmhunter.co.uk/watc...
    DISCOUNT CODE FOR SUBSCRIBERS: 'CHSUB'
    This code is available on selected lines only.
    OUR NEW PERSONAL INSTAGRAM: / chisholmhunterwatches
    Follow our Social Media:
    Instagram: / chisholmhunter
    Facebook: / chisholmhunterofficial
    My Personal RUclips: / harrisonbrownscotland
    Chisholm Hunter is Scotland's largest Luxury Watch retailer and one of the largest in the UK with over 29 stores throughout the United Kingdom. With brands such as Omega, Breguet, Vacheron Constantin, Longines, Tudor, Zenith, Blancpain and many more. Multiple Jeweller of the Year - Three years running.
    Discover more exceptional watches at www.chisholmhunter.co.uk

Комментарии • 69

  • @dec1aim_flow432
    @dec1aim_flow432 Год назад +32

    So for your info, the extension on the left is NOT an Helium escape valve but the ingenuous bezel mechanism… also, because of the very slim lugs, it actually wears more like a 40.5-41 and works ok for very slim wrist.

  • @speedzero7478
    @speedzero7478 Год назад +9

    I did know. I've been waiting for IWC to update the Aquatimer for years now, getting disappointed at each annual watch event. Glad they finally upgraded one of the most unique and cool divers around, I'll probably purchase it.

  • @KAL-589
    @KAL-589 Год назад +13

    Great timing. I've been looking into this for the past week. There is also a manufacture version with 120 hour reserve!

  • @jaredmartignoni7788
    @jaredmartignoni7788 Год назад +9

    That’s not a helium escape at the 9. It’s the gear housing for the internal rotating bezel

  • @kerrywillner5626
    @kerrywillner5626 Год назад +5

    Dear sir .A question. The iwc you review I believed to have an in house movement with 120 hour power reserve in the latest version. Please correct me if I am wrong.

  • @seansawyer6124
    @seansawyer6124 Год назад +3

    Was this Guy in the Movie Trainspotting???? LOL

  • @jasont4783
    @jasont4783 Год назад +4

    IWC has really grown on me as of late. The Petite Prince and of course the Big Pilot but after your video I'll need to give their diver a closer look (specifically the blue variant). Enjoy the donuts 😋. Cheers!

  • @JL-xo2ed
    @JL-xo2ed Год назад +2

    AWESOME watch, got the blue dial with blue rubber strap. 42mm with 5 days reserve and keeping the iconic look works for me!

  • @RagnarHoff
    @RagnarHoff Год назад +2

    This model is upgraded with the 5-day power reserve movement now which is a reason to get it now. I wanted it for the longest time, but i couldn't justify the price earlier with the basic eta movement.

  • @impexRQ
    @impexRQ Год назад +2

    Thanks a lot for the review
    … I always found the IWC Aquatimer very interesting and quite unique with the inner rotation bezel and I was even waiting for the updated on the in-house movement … however, since I got my Blancpain Fifty Fathoms titanium Blue … there is not diver in todays market which can get any closer to it … so, not need for divers anymore … but still quite interesting watch

  • @defenstrator4660
    @defenstrator4660 Год назад

    That "double crown" you keep talking about was the knob to control the internal time bezel. Now it is controlled through a ratchet system incorporated into the outer bezel, and the piece on the side is not a helium escape valve. It's part of the ratchet system. You had some nice watch shots though.

  • @devnithiavelrathinam1511
    @devnithiavelrathinam1511 Год назад

    0.21 - 0.36 - I really thought you were taking out the watch from a case, but no, its a donut!! 🤣 Anyway cool review. I'm a big fan of the Omega Seamaster range, and I own a SMP 300 in black and an Aqua Terra white dial. On the other hand, the Aquatimer had caught my eye and I have been eyeing it for sometime now. Probably would pull the trigger soon as I think it's really unique despite its chunky case.

  • @RS-jb1lf
    @RS-jb1lf 11 месяцев назад +1

    Such a beautiful watch.

  • @affegorilla1299
    @affegorilla1299 Год назад +2

    I like it very much!

  • @donaldneo4317
    @donaldneo4317 Год назад +1

    Breitling need to learn from IWC on how make a inner rotating bezel like this with high WR for their Navitimer! 30m WR is holding me back from the cool new 41mm Navitimer.

    • @popalaurian
      @popalaurian Год назад

      Breitling Navitimer don’t want to be a IWC Aquatimer 😂😂😂

  • @ronniep9272
    @ronniep9272 Год назад +2

    This is a watch that has to be seen in person to appreciate it. Very nice modern industrial design.

    • @daviddigilio3036
      @daviddigilio3036 Год назад +2

      This is an important point. I tried it on this week at the AD and I have to say that it's stunning. Contrary to the video, I found it to wear really well on my 6.75" wrist. Not too big at all. And the look is that perfect blend of German minimalism and industrial design. Every surface is so well executed in finish and design. I really love it and am trying to decide whether I want the new in-house or ETA model for my next watch. 120hrs power reserve is really impressive.
      As my eyes get worse and worse, I've come to appreciate a larger dial that is laid out well and easy to read and the IWC excels in this regard.
      Two Points for the reviewer: The bulge on the left is a cover that hides the bezel mechanism. It is not an HEV. There are videos on YT that show the action works. This watch thankfully doesn't have an HEV. Also, the bezel is meant to be used in a ratcheting style. When he turns the bezel clockwise, it's not just a gimmick, even though it's fun to work back and forth. It's so that you can slide your grip over the bezel and work it in shorter turns without loosening you grip, making it's action different from a regular bezel.

    • @ronniep9272
      @ronniep9272 Год назад +2

      @@daviddigilio3036 good points. You're right the finishing is immaculate and very interesting to look at. I saw a submariner and then this watch shortly after on the same day, this was so much more eye catching. The dial looks simple in videos but in person the depth is amazing and the green lume from the 0-15 on the bezel really pops. I honestly don't understand why this doesn't get much attention/love from the public or isn't promoted much by IWC. It has the most unique diving bezel out there and a power reserve of 5 days, name me one other Diver with these qualities, especially at this price point. Are you looking to get it on the rubber strap or bracelet.

    • @daviddigilio3036
      @daviddigilio3036 Год назад

      @@ronniep9272 I'll be getting it on the strap for sure. Too chunky on the bracelet for me. My BB58 Blue does the bracelet trick for me.
      This watch wasn't seen as a great value because of the use of an ETA movement, but that is no longer an issue. I think that IWC as a brand had a down decade or two and only (relatively) recently have they busted out with their Pilot's lineup again. WUS were buying the watches in smaller volumes, but their marketing in the last few years and sponsorship of the Petronas AMG cars has put them at the forefront for non-collectors/ enthusiasts.
      The diver still lags behind by a lot in sales numbers, but the Sub and it's many imitators pretty much suck the oxygen out of the room in the genre. JLC's compressor divers are fantastic to handle and wear. Same for GO SeaQ, Blancpain and a few others. But Rolex, Tudor, and to a slightly lesser extent, Omega dominate the market. Just look at watchrecon and count the number of Black Bays, Subs, and Seamasters up for sale.
      But imo it's cool to strap watches like this on without all the fanfare, stares, and fear of being held up that comes with wearing a Sub. As long as resale isn't a concern, this is an outstanding choice for a dive watch or one watch collection.

    • @ronniep9272
      @ronniep9272 Год назад +1

      @@daviddigilio3036 did you buy it? I saw it again in Central London this past weekend and it looked better to me than any sports watch sharing the same display window from Rolex, Omega, Tudor, Blancpain and Zenith. I'm seriously tempted to sell my 2017 Seamaster to help fund buying it!

  • @ams914
    @ams914 Год назад +2

    I would trade my "great white" SMP for an Aquatimer, honestly.

  • @antipartisan6921
    @antipartisan6921 Год назад

    I'm waiting for this

  • @affegorilla1299
    @affegorilla1299 Год назад +1

    Nice 😊

  • @user-wi9nn6dz8w
    @user-wi9nn6dz8w Год назад

    Dear IWC, please bring back the Aquatimer reference 3548 or a slightly updated version thereof!

  • @aboner2551
    @aboner2551 Год назад

    Double crown is what would make this one interesting for me.

  • @scottt.4596
    @scottt.4596 Год назад

    14.1mm?!!! Hmm, what is the ratio of potential deep-sea diver buyers vs desk diver buyers? IWC marketing department: “Let’s spend millions to design and promote a watch to go after the smaller of the two markets.” The dial and case are beautiful! Totally IWC. Place the two crowns on the right, get rid of the date, make it 12mm and take my money! I’ve got $10k to spend on an IWC, unfortunately, they haven’t offered a new Reference that doesn’t have one or two bad design issues. As a watch super-freak I find this incredibly frustrating. Good video. Thanks!

  • @sungmanshin
    @sungmanshin Год назад +2

    120 hours power reserve not 42

  • @rm7097
    @rm7097 Год назад

    This is the old model not the 2022 model with the 32111 Caliber.

  • @christophsebastians.6917
    @christophsebastians.6917 Год назад +1

    I am a fan of the improved movement of JLC Polaris (Black dial) was presented this year.

  • @chadboldock2378
    @chadboldock2378 Год назад

    No markings on the bezel?..... can't do it

    • @fifthpint4571
      @fifthpint4571 Год назад

      Can’t do what, read? Markings are clearly on the bezel, which is internal - under the crystal lol

  • @MrBev19
    @MrBev19 Год назад +1

    Donuts? Idk if we needed that but OK

  • @torontowatches9709
    @torontowatches9709 11 месяцев назад +1

    HE ESCAPE VALVE 😂😂😂😂

  • @mkyhou1160
    @mkyhou1160 Год назад +1

    The date window looks like my beater citizen. Basically too small to read, this would be better without it.

  • @ams914
    @ams914 Год назад

    If the AR scratches, ignore it, enjoy your life, and they'll replace the crystal when you service it in 5-10 years.

  • @daviddigilio3036
    @daviddigilio3036 Год назад

    To all who are disappointed that the design changes don't add up to much, I think you have to ask yourself why this current design needs to be dramatically changed. If you look at the lineage of the model, it's very easy to see the evolutionary nature of this current design. That's important for a brand. Just look at Breitling for the opposite of this theory. As far as their diver lineup, they're a bit lost as far as what they want to be.
    As for the current Aquatimer design, if anything, it's its own thing. I like that, and having tried on the watch, I find it a very compelling design and construction. I found that it wears smaller than the SMP's that I've recently owned. It might sit a little taller, but felt more compact overall to me. The SMP was always a little "pancakey" to me. The bezel is a thing of beauty in construction and design. And for my old eyes, the legibility is superb. Add in 120 hours of PR, and you have one compelling choice that looks nothing like anything Sub-derived out there today.
    So why change it? To make it look more like divers that are already out there on the market? I think IWC has a marketing issue with this watch. That's the problem. They don't market it at all. They make a few great special editions, but I think they could do even more in this regard as well. I wouldn't mind a few more adventurous color choices, but as for an overhaul of the design, put me in the not necessary column. Pu the watch on Tom Brady or Lewis Hamilton, or Chris Pratt and Tom Cruise, and they'd be moving off the shelves at a much higher clip.

  • @ProfessorPesca
    @ProfessorPesca Год назад +1

    The Aquatimer and Ingenieur ranges from IWC are just so bland looking to me. The aquatimer used to have some lovely jazzy colour variations, now it’s just available in black and this sober blue.

    • @ronniep9272
      @ronniep9272 Год назад

      Have a look in person, it looks very nice.

  • @adamcrossfire4747
    @adamcrossfire4747 Год назад +9

    As an IWC Fan and owner I’m disappointed with this release…it’s been 8 years since the last Aqua Timer launch, to keep the watch aesthetically and ergonomically very similar is a cop out….I was hoping they’d make it more acceptable for a variety of wrists…40mm and 48 L2L would have been far better….then there’s the price…..just not worth it

    • @stephanwilliot2324
      @stephanwilliot2324 Год назад

      There is a new version with in-house caliber and 120 hour power reserve so they didn‘t work on the outside or style but worked on its soul for 500 EUR extra.

    • @fifthpint4571
      @fifthpint4571 Год назад +3

      I disagree, Adam. I think this design (along with the safe dove bezel and the clutch housing on the left) is mature enough to serve as a very strong platform to establish a long-term design language that will evolve in small increments. I don’t see much to revolutionize here tbh. What would you change specifically yourself?

    • @bngr_bngr
      @bngr_bngr Год назад +1

      They sell for half on the used market.

    • @ronniep9272
      @ronniep9272 Год назад +1

      @@bngr_bngr then that's a good bargain. It has a 120 hours power reserve and the most unique bezel in any watch.

    • @daviddigilio3036
      @daviddigilio3036 Год назад +1

      @@bngr_bngr Most brands not named Rolex, AP, PP (and a few other niche Independents sell) for half price or thereabouts on the used market. Watches aren't investments. Their durable goods meant to be used. The smart move, if you have to buy new, is to find an AD willing to discount 10-20%. But that doesn't make it a bad watch. I suggest handling it and trying it on. It's an outstanding watch with a design language all its own.

  • @jeromef.5489
    @jeromef.5489 Год назад

    No HEV, it’s what IWC calls their dive safe system.

  • @peterward2845
    @peterward2845 Год назад

    Put the cookie down!

  • @diegom.8773
    @diegom.8773 Год назад

    Just nice, i prefer your Omega as a dice watch

  • @davidb9531
    @davidb9531 Год назад +1

    Apologies but it doesn’t seem to wear big at all

  • @chriskim7123
    @chriskim7123 Год назад

    Best flop ever. Citizen or CasioOceanus would make better diver 😂

    • @ronniep9272
      @ronniep9272 Год назад

      Have a look at this watch in person. It looks far more luxurious than any Seamaster, Black Bay or even Submariner. The finish is immaculate.

  • @ABCTEST213
    @ABCTEST213 Год назад

    IWC make diving watches, but they stop updating that series for years.....

  • @emmanuelcastro4869
    @emmanuelcastro4869 11 месяцев назад

    🥱

  • @seayak
    @seayak Год назад

    I could see diddly squat when you moved this unique internal bezel, and I was interested in seeing how it worked - if it moves in both directions but only indexes one way, it sounds like it works like a ractchet wrench, which I could see being quite useful. Why not show this in a closeup shot? As it stands, this 'demonstration" was completely uninformative.

  • @subzero9460
    @subzero9460 Год назад +1

    Very average looking watch which is too big for most medium wrists, powered by a very average 42 hour power reserve. Given the competition I can’t see the point of this release?!

    • @ronniep9272
      @ronniep9272 Год назад +1

      It has a 120 hour power reserve. Have a look at the watch in person. Its very beautiful.

  • @hvarcz
    @hvarcz Год назад

    Iwc make divers for years

  • @richardgordon1031
    @richardgordon1031 Год назад +3

    What a bizarre video.

  • @subzero9460
    @subzero9460 Год назад

    Harrison why are you always zipping your jacket up? What’s that all about?

    • @ChisholmHunterOfficial
      @ChisholmHunterOfficial  Год назад +1

      Because it puts the watch in a good lifestyle situation for you guys to see.

  • @nikolastojadinovic2534
    @nikolastojadinovic2534 Год назад +1

    I understand the marketing, commercial's but don't talk with your mouth full.

  • @MrZcotty
    @MrZcotty Год назад

    that thing is hideous. that gear driven nonsense on the left side should be long gone..

  • @gackerman99
    @gackerman99 Год назад

    bummer that it looks so stupid