The Great Debate: Wilfred Reilly vs. Jared Taylor on HBCU Campus
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 сен 2024
- The header for this video pretty much says it all. This is Will Reilly debating Jared Taylor on the campus of Kentucky State University. Dr. Reilly - unsurprisingly one of the guys behind this channel - is a tenure-track HBCU Professor (K-State) with a PhD (Southern Illinois) and a law degree (University of Illinois). This is the full video and audio of his debate with Jared Taylor, the Yale-educated founder and head of the American Renaissance Foundation.
This is among the most one-sided victories I've ever seen. Jared Taylor is a national treasure.
Agreed! But it’s also an egregious display of the thinly-veiled truth of what so many folks ultimately desire with regards to the mere existence of the sole progenitors of the First World. They want our complete eradication so that, along with us, all their feelings of envy, inferiority and humiliation may likewise cease to exist.
That is an especially SCARY revelation when you honestly acknowledge that we’re the only ones about whom the desire for that outcome could possibly be expressed openly, unapologetically and with zero consequences. And in the FIRST WORLD no less! Yet it’s completely on trend with their whole “banish it if it makes you feel somehow less than”!
Agreed. But you have to admit that this was exemplary of how people always ultimately tell on themselves. First Worlders are the only ones for whom it's accepted to openly call for our erasure. After all, when we go, along with us dies all the feelings of envy, resentment, inferiority and utter humiliation our mere existence inadvertently causes the over-fed and ungrateful recipients of our pathologically altruistic "feeding hands".
I absolutely agree. People are finally waking up from the dead stupor that these God-hating woke-liberal leftists preach as their religion and their service to destroying the nations. They are bringing them all together so the entire world will worship the Beast, and they lie about the Bible not being true. These woke liberal leftists hate everyone, even their own, misery loves company.
Hes a racist clown
National treasure my foot. What Jared Taylor is is someone who thinks a bell can be unrung, or an egg unscrambled. What he is is somebody who thinks that if we didn’t have racial or ethnic differences, then we would not have to deal with conflicts just as divisive.
The black female students hollering during the questions portion is a direct representation of diversity in action.
Same experience in movie theaters as well.
I’m a Jared Taylor supporter but ngl I’ve met dumbass whites like that so I do think it’s deeper than race it actually also goes down to ethnicity as well.
You’re so embarrassing. The way Jared Taylor’s fans can’t tell how much more intelligent he is than them. 💀He probably can’t stand you guys he’s just fighting for the few white people he knows from the upper classes not you guys. 😂😂
Brilliant presentation Mr Taylor
Icarus Diversity only worked for the US and the West because they are rich and white race is the only race stupid enough to put up with this nonsense racism against whites in the name of white guilt, multiculturalism, egalitarianism and political correctness. Whites are giving up their sovereign rights every day by allowing immigration and discrimination laws against them such as affirmative action and the welfare.
All the research shows that diversity brings distrust and eventually leads to violence and destruction of cultures. Biologically we always seek out those who are similar. History is filled with empirical evidence of diversity failures. India and Pakistan? China and Nepal? Turkey and Armenia? I used to work for a company that employed both Indian and Pakistani and they would not even talk to each other. Ask them if diversity is a good thing, while they come to the US and support diversity! How hypocritical!
Whites will no longer be a majority in the US very soon and sit back and watch what will happen to the US. The overwhelming majority of the young population will be non-white and older population will be white. You know how young minorities in the US are repeatedly indoctrinated by media and their culture to hate white people and blame them for all of their failures? I suspect that persecution of whites in South Africa may be a good indicator of the what will be happening to whites in the USA's future. And good luck getting your social security check.
You guys need to stand up for your rights. Democracy is a majority rule. If you lose your majority, tides will turn and the USA will become a different country, probably more like Mexico and Brazil with a mix of radical Islamist ideas. This would not affect rich politicians and CEOs on both sides, but it will only affect common American folks. Frankly, I think you have already gone past point of no return and all you can do is the slow process down. Donald Trump was a really fresh character in politics who understood this needs to happen. I don’t think he is thinking in terms of race, but he is definitely thinking in terms of America's sovereign rights to protect its border.
Just remember, no superpower stayed in power forever in the history of mankind. Cultural Marxism is your greatest threat.
-From the outsider observer who wants nothing more than world peace
@Dalavar Redclaw What does gender have to do with race? If white women are benefitting most from affirmative action, it probabably has to do with their gender, not the fact that they're white. Nice equivocation fallacy there.
@S. W. Sonny Read my reply.
Look at all the great civilizations (e.g. Rome, Egypt) that have crumbled over the past 2500 years due to massive immigration of other races (with miscegenation/mongrelization also involved), resulting in the majority racial population being replaced by something else. History is the truth that diversity is not a strength for a nation. Mono-racial societies have always flourished as compared to the collapsed multi-racial/multi-ethnic civilizations of man. PERIOD! END OF SENTENCE! AND END OF DEBATE!!!
@@Kirboe111 this is the real purpose of intersectionality, company's which are forced to hire on quotas could hire blacks and white women and never hire a black women. Intersectionality is a tweaking of existing AA not the discovery of a new form of discrimination.
The year is 2023 and I think now that Jared Taylor was right about all of this. There is no fixing this. It will only end in tears.
Don’t worry in just couple decades whites will be a tiny minority
@@Halgame99 Do you think they will still get blamed for everyone else's problems?
@@Halgame99whites have been a global minority since forever mate
Did I just hear Reilly say Pyramids were part of black culture? That is a preposterous claim.
Depends which ones, right, mate? In Meroe or Ethiopia, probably. Egypt: depends on the Dynasty and how you define "Black." Mexico: probably not.
LRN_News WE WUZ KANGZ
@Mourning Star LMAO GOOD ONE!!
Genetic samples have been extracted from both Egyptian and Sumerian mummified remains. Consistently, time and time again, predominately European DNA.
This was before the recent genetic testing that was done which determined the Pharos were Caucasian.
Why on earth would you think it's good for blonde hair and blue eyes to cease to exist? Even if race was only skin deep, that's a pretty sickening notion.
Jo Jo Blue eyes, they are the only ones, who else?
Jo Jo 😂
Jo Jo
Dumbshit, the only peoples that have those features that aren't white in skin color inherited them from having one or more Northern Europeans in their ancestry! Those are absolutely NORTHERN EUROPEAN TRAITS.
@Jo Jo learn how to create a sentence.
Exactly. I for one would miss seeing a blonde blue eyed gal from time to time
So, Western Civilization is being sold in exchange for a Taco, an Egg Roll, some Hip Hop, and a sub-Saharan African winning the Boston Marathon every year? Seems like we should have held out for a little more. Two hours and Mr. Reilly managed to say nothing. Taylor: 100, Reilly: 0.
+Madison Eclectic The amazing thing is that you can prepare whatever kinds of foods you want without being overrun by another group of people.
I eat chicken tikka masala for dinner all the time, yet I'm pretty sure there is only one Indian family in my entire county (there was another a few years back, but the patriarch was arrested for some kind of child pornography charge, so the rest of the family moved out because of the stigma).
Sad to see people destroying the most successful countries on earth because they are too lazy to look up a recipe online or just too incompetent to cook.
actually the guy who won was a saharan african, from northern eritrea, which northern most tip is in the saharan desert.
On a low iq cavemam would get that narrative after this debate
@@marohan Trump is yo daddy boy.
@@theconstitutionalconservative1 how your boi doing now. 10 trillion debt bill. That economy wasnt so hot. Divided the whole country along racial lines. High IQ is what u got. He laughed at Obama's handle of outbreaks. Now he has the worse handling in western hemisphere. The great divider.
Just watching this video I noticed a major undeniable contrast between Mr. Taylor and Mr. Reilly:
Mr. Taylor provides exhaustive statistics after statistics, facts after facts, with very little flowery language to bedazzle his audience.
Mr. Reilly, however, though he uses some facts (albeit out of context several times), generally stresses feelings ("Diversity is just more fun!") Excuse me? "more fun"? How exactly do you quantify that? Purely subjective. Even more disappointing: when refuting his opponent, Mr. Reilly simply makes statements like "Mr. Taylor is just wrong...... I won't bore you with the details..... he's just wrong."
+Stephanie Drake
spoiled child, is that how you were raised?
you can't argue so you insult and you can't commit violence over the internet so you tell someone to kill themself?
I think you're doing a good job of proving Jared Taylor right, like 90% of the rest of your race.
Reilly presented many studies of which the study from the University of Edinburgh is the most relevant and credible of any cited during the entire debate, I didn't watch this debate with a closed mind and I was prepared to believe Taylor but he didn't present a strong enough of a case.
Suhaib Arifuddin interesting display of source bias.
Well there's bias in everything I'm just biased towards a study done by one of the top 20 Universities in the world.
Zack Morley Your right on... Feelings verses facts. Drake is an example.
The IQ differential between Mr. Taylor and these students is hilarious.
Jared Taylor is an idiot and a fake American.
@@is17a985go back to robbing Apple stores and stabbing white ppl
@@is17a985We wuz intellectual n sheeeeeit.
@@JarrodButali Nazi troll.
@is17a985 you're fucking clueless
So the benefits of diversity are ... food, music and sports? Things that either couldn't be any more of a purely subjective, personal preference or are largely frivolous. How persuasive.
Jared Nelson this focus on frivolities indicates societal degenarcy
Yeah, that and the end of tribalism.
Food, music and sports make "racial diversity" worth it? I'll take my chances with homogeneity thanks.
JeanClaude Clemenceau Reilly was just on Tucker Carlson talking about his research into hoax hate crimes perpetrated by the left. I guess Jared taught him something here anyway.
Lol the food, music, and sports aren’t even good. You can remove them and we’d be over it in a year 😆
Kudos to the University of Kentucky for doing what the Ivy leagues and other elite schools don't have the guts to do --having an open debate about Diversity.
aint just Ivy leagues and elites anymore brotha, its gotten pretty bad. i'm studying an EdD in educational leadership right now and you don't even want to know some of the garbage that is just blatantly blurted out as fact in the middle of class, completely out of nowhere when it doesnt even have to do with the class convesation. sad
@@OneSliceNation All whites are racist? Colonialism was evil? White supremacy kills black people every day? What was it, i'm curious lol.
32:20 Bosnia is not a "mono-racial" society, but a state characterized by ethnic cleavages (ie. diversity) that led to a genocidal war. Reilly vindicated Taylor's point within ten seconds of me skipping to his opening. It's astonishing that someone like that holds a PhD or professorship. Anyway, brilliant work as always, Mr. Taylor.
+SunTzu1md - Apparently, you somehow ignored one of my three major points: that RACIAL diversity tends to produce what in quantitative political science is known as pragmatic group consolidation or "Linked Fate" (Dawson 1994; Horowitz 2000; Simein 2005) and thus greatly reduce sub-racial ETHNIC conflict. Thus, almost all of the most violent societies - read down the list: Somalia, Iraq, Syria, Venezuela, Sudan, Chechnya, Bosnia, etc - contain only one bio-genetic race but substantial tribal fracturing within that race. This is a direct counter to Mr. Taylor's claim that "whiteness" has long been a single identity and that all white groups - Jews and Gentiles, Greeks and Turks, Italians and Irishmen - would live in peace if restored to traditional levels of in-group identification and returned to an all white environment.
+Wilfred Reilly First off, you're attacking a strawman. When did Jared say that "all white groups would live in peace" in the absence of racial diversity? Jared made it remarkably clear that there are fault lines BESIDES RACE: religion, language, tradition, etc. Reducing racial diversity would reduce conflict, but it would not eliminate conflict altogether -- and no one claims that it would!
Whether or not there is conflict WITHIN races is largely irrelevant. No one is questioning the fact that Shias and Sunnis are killing each other almost entirely over religious differences. That's irrelevant to the discussion. The relevant question is, would more RACIAL diversity make their societies worse off or better off? Based on the evidence (some of which Jared was able to present in the debate), it's clear that more racial diversity would serve to worsen the overall condition of any civilization.
+George Foreman - your argument here is coherent: that increased racial diversity, with all other variables adjusted for, increases conflict. The problem, in quantitative terms, is that that's not really true. The nations with the most diversity of actual mature races and religions - the USA, Canada, China in religious terms - tend to be relatively peaceful world powers. There is a slight but real correlation between mature diversity and peace. The religious diversity map, which links to the racial diversity map at the bottom, is right here: www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/06/countries-religious-diversity_n_5093551.html. Notice that the States, Europe, the well-off LatinAm north, and so on all light up as bright green for "very diverse."
In contrast, the most violent nations on Earth are all mono-racial and mono-religious, with fighting primarily along TRIBAL lines. This tends to be smaller scale, more brutal, and harder to control. This is the ETHNIC diversity map: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2326136/Worlds-apart-Uganda-tops-list-ethnically-diverse-countries-Earth-South-Korea-comes-bottom.html. Here, notice Africa, Eastern Europe, and the like light up as "very diverse" despite being almost totally mono-racial.
Quite often if not always, racial diversity like the USA's seems to lead to the consolidation of smaller groups into larger groups that fight less. I might not argue that this effect is universal. However, humans seem able to fight over virtually anything - Taylor, myself, and two questioners all cited SPORTS related fatalities running into the dozens. The data indicate that racial diversity - while bringing the cultural and genetic benefits I mention - certainly does not increase violence beyond the level caused by unavoidable tribal diversity. Obviously, there's a common sense element here. I personally would not admit thousands of immigrants to the USA who were recently soldiers for countries fighting the USA (!!!), or who are of good genetic "stock" but totally illiterate for cultural reasons. But, there is no statistical reason, at all, to assume that Nigerian or Japanese immigrants would clash with native whites more than Serbian immigrants.
Wilfred Reilly what are your thoughts on the correlation of longitudinal attitude from the equator and IQ. Also what are your thoughts on CRISPR technology in relation to consolidation along racial lines. The way it seems to me is if we can design our children. Both of your points would become moot.
Wilfred Reilly It’s a wild claim to say that countries with high racial diversity are peaceful and prosperous BECAUSE they are diverse. I’d say they’re those things are IN SPITE of diversity. The West was all those things before diversity. It’s true we’ve become more peaceful since then, but the decrease was already happening back then and there’s no evidence that diversity made it peaceful.
If diversity is good, why zoologists caution the practice of introducing alien varieties to a new geological area for fear of it having devastating effect to local species and environment?
Damn.
You can't possibly compare a human diversity debate to an animal debate.
Jamie R Deem How is that? Animals don't have "Choice", they are governed by a system that is not of their making.
Quincy Sloan they do have a choice and routinely root out foreign species or are replaced every, see Asian carp.
James Robinson Animals to insects, all serve a purpose.
Why does Dr. Reilly get to answer when the questions are directed towards Mr. Taylor? It doesn't make sense.
@MrOverCritical1989 Needs to be helped! Sort of like a "your momma put down contest" effect!
55:55 "Mr Taylor likes white people. I don't think there will be white people in two hundred years, and that's a good thing."
Wait, WHAT?!
What is wrong with preferring your own race?
"Mr Wilfred likes black people. I don't think there will be black people in two hundred years, and that's a good thing." Of course, Mr Taylor didn't say that nor is that his position. He just wants people to be allowed to self-segregate without being demonized. On the other hand, Mr. Wilfred is happy to see white people gone. Which is a more racist position to take?
@@cmk5724 Maybe he has issues because his parents mixed?
@Brazilian/Norway You're talking about forced separation. Mr. Taylor is talking about voluntary separation. In S. Africa, we only tried forced separation and now, forced integration.
Brazilian/Norway
Compare the days of Apartheid to today. Apartheid was categorically better for both races than integration is today. Today? Whites are systematically being gen0cided by blacks. Segregation is what wights do to quarantine themselves from bl4ck vi0lent cr1me.
why did this include a moment of silence for Prince. I agree he was a great loss and his music was amazing, but it has no place in a race debate. That sounded like racial pandering to me. like , oh you gotta agree with me I loved Prince. lol wtf
Moments of silence have no place at all in debates.
oh fuck off.
They worship Prince 2Pac Michel Jordan I worship Einstein Bethoven Picasso !!!!!!!!
@@anonymusinkoholic61 (((Einstein))) was a total fraud
Wilfred Reilly advocates the GENOCIDE of all races through global interbreeding, resulting in a mono "universal blend" race. This makes him a UNI-BLEND SUPREMACIST.
Im 34 minutes into this debate I can already see the contrast between these two men. Their approaches are very different. Jared seemed to be completely respectful and charitable, while Reilly came of as super condescending. Reilly also seems to pander to the audience quite a bit since he knows they will be on his side, and Jared mostly just sticks to the facts and the points being made without making too many emotional appeals.
A lot of the data and examples that Reilly presented are almost irrelevant. All of the violent countries that happen to be homogenous that he listed, are all 3rd world countries. With that, I can name many 1st world countries that are almost ethnostates where crime is almost non-existent. Japan, Poland, South Korea, Iceland, Finland, and Norway. There are a lot of factors that play into this, but these countries' homogeny definitely plays a big role in it. My point is, in this context, we can't really compare 3rd world countries to 1st world countries. And we can talk about why those 3rd world countries are the way they are, but that's a different discussion.
Reilly also tries to write Jared off as a bigot, classic tactic. Make your opponent seem like a bad person so no one takes their argument seriously. Jared never said that the problems with the black community are purely genetic. This isn't an absolutist argument, of course the environment plays it's own role. But so does genetics. We can't ignore either of them. Reilly ignores genetics, Jared acknowledges both. And Reilly said that these issues are cultural and not racial. Jared never said that culture didn't play a role, in fact Reilly lays out half our argument for us when he said that. Culture is a huge factor, but race is often times tied into the culture.
Reilly also has super childish reasons for supporting diversity. Mixed women, really? I know it was meant as sort of a joke, but this is a serious conversation. Not to mention all of the other inconsequential things like food, music, and being better at sports. Yeah those things are cool, but there are bigger problems that need to be addressed, and sacrifices need to be made. To anyone who is treating this topic seriously, those reasons should not convince them to support diversity. These inconsequential reasons should be a sign that he was running out of reasons and arguments.
And these differences Jared talks about aren't purely racial, they have to do with ethnicity as well. Ethnicity deals with a group with a common national and cultural identity. American whites are different from European whites, French whites are different from German whites, and Slavs are different from Anglos. But Reilly strawmanned this too. So no, there isn't just one white identity, there are a lot of white identities. We aren't advocating for all white people to be in one place, we want America to be America, Germany to be Germany, and France to be France.
Reilly's inbreeding argument is probably the worst argument he made. It's laughable. Each race has gotten to the point where inbreeding wouldn't occur in a mono-racial society. Japan is 99% Japanese, and they don't have an inbreeding problem. People will not be that close to each other genetically for it to be called inbreeding. There are no examples of an ethnostate having to resort to inbreeding. Such a stupid and baseless argument.
Reilly was also hardly arguing for diversity. He says he like diversity, but then says it's a good thing that all races will eventually merge into one, and become HOMOGENOUS. And thus conceding that diversity really isn't a strength. He wants homogeny, but in a possibly worse way than we do. We want every race to survive and thrive. If we all became one, all of that culture would be gone.
Reilly's fatal flaw in this debate was that he assumed every argument made by Jared is absolutist. When none of them are, there are some exceptions to everything. Nothing is one dimensional like that. And he just tries to paint Jared as a bigot, and makes assumptions about Jared's reasons and intentions. Which is frankly disgusting, especially for a man like Jared. Jared was way too charitable to this man.
The main tactic of he bad faith debater is shame and mockery.
Great comment
I mean the reason Jared wins debates is because what he’s talks about is real and has been the state of the world for its entire existence. We all know it and see it but refuse to acknowledge it because it’s been labeled as bad
The black weakness is pride... and stupidity.
Wonderful commentary. Thank you.
"All he did was put his hands up".
WRONG!!!
Jared pointed out that there’s no way Blacks will ever see the Ferguson incident as Whites do. It’s like when O. J. Simpson was acquitted. Whites watching television were shocked, whereas a room full of Black law students at Howard University Law School who were watching television when the jury came back with a “not guilty “ verdict, all jumped out of their chairs, whooping with joy.
@@conradgaarder2789 Yes, bit we should agree on facts...... I think it is a set of facts that Michael Brown was resisting arrest, he did not put his hands up and he did go for the officer's gun.... those are FACTS as found by the US Justice Department and other organizations. There should be no descreprency in these.
@@williamerdman4888 But the fact that we have not and will not agree on FACTS is the entire problem.
Lol, Reilly accused Taylor of a lack of diversity understanding and finished up with speaking in Spanish…not realizing Taylor can speak Japanese and French much more fluently, and and lived in Asia for almost his entire childhood while afterward vagabonding across sub-Saharan Africa. The intellectual disparity between those two is night and day, lol.
Wilfred is pro white genocide
"You blacks."
😂😂😂😂 and everybody was beginning to loose their shit.
"or African Americans If you prefer."
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Racial diversity? That's what the planet is for. No need to cram it all in one country.
So go back to Europe than you can have all white soicety you imperialist freak
@@TheAaronChand Wish I could. Unlike America, it's not quite so easy to just "go to Europe". You ever try to get citizenship in another country? Not so easy. They know how to say "no" unlike the Liberal pukes here. America was founded as a white European colony. Where we went all wrong was bringing in slave labor in the first place. Should have never happened. We brought in slaves that depended on whites for everything and after slavery was abolished, not much has changed to this day. Couple that with Leftist bullshit like the increased welfare state and "sanctuary" cities along with a whole slew of illegals and you've got a big hot steamy pile of shit. My ancestors built this country without any slave ownership. This is my land. YOU go somewhere else you libtard puke.
@@Michael_00001 and in the words of Indian freedom fighter Bghart Singh during India independence movement. Against the British Empire. And you dont forget this is our country. In the case of north America Canada USA Australia new Zealand Mexico south America central America. Its native country. As a brown skinned Hindu Indian person with a Indian background born in the west Canada.
@@Michael_00001 your ancestors where dirty beef eaters who got rich off looting my ancestors in India most of the wealth that the British Empire had was from its colonies India was the Crown jewel because of its jewels textiles industry cotton tea. That the East India company looted the wealth of India during Company rule from 1757 to 1858. and later the British Raj or direct government rule in 1858 to 1947 until India independence. And of course the Partition of India and Pakistan and Bangladesh as seprate countries. Burma was separated as it's own country in or colony in 1938.
@@Michael_00001 white European needed the rescources of India and China to enrich themselves and the rescources from African countries and its slave labour of Africans and rescources of other colonies such as Jamacia Barbados Caribbean islands. India lost $45 trillion because of Brtish empire clonial rule.
I am genuinely embarrassed by Riley. My IQ dropped 10 points just trying to listen to his gibberish.
Yes, we are all the dumber for listening to this pseudo intellectual.
The continent of Africa would benefit greatly from diversity.
@@ricya1982 ??
There are many Chinese people there.
It’s true, the only decent countries there are the colonized one.
Why does this Reilly guy talk like hes on an infomercial? He sounds so smug and arrogant.
He stole articulate grammer from whitey!!!
@@LadyCroMag you believe white people created air.
Maybe he could talk about My Pillow?
right, the guys voice kills me.
Taylor: “Knowing someone from a different country doesn’t make you knowledgeable of their country”
Reilly: “Me gusta salsa!”
This is like something out of cheap comedy film 🤦🏼♂️
Jared Taylor is awesome. He gives me strength. If he's not afraid of these lunatics who hate him, I shouldn't be, either.
There are so many of them though, it’s frightening!
The only lunatic here is you
@haseeb2167
i want to live a good live without fearing that i will "hurt somebodies feelings" for saying
the truth ...means i want to live separated from diversity ----access to the world that White ppl created is not a human right ...we have the right to be left alone
@haseeb2167you don’t realize how dangerous legislating to protect your feelings is. The road to Hell is paved with good intentions. Women shouldn’t have been given the vote. They always vote with their feelings
Mr Taylor was treated unfairly.
yes they dont respect eachother why should they respect Mr .Taylor
the way the questions went made me cringe. it fell apart and they were losing control and that was because folks didn't care for the truth.
Did he just say black culture built the pyramids? So basically he's saying... WE WAZ KANGZ AND SHIEETTTT????
Elizabeth Taylor wearing suntan lotion built it
@Anonymous 2020 we know you didnt build anything in your lifetime
John Mirra, we have found out that Ancient Egypt was a black civilization. Even the drawings on the walls show it.
@@BallinNQnz no they don’t
@@BallinNQnz they show brown and light skin olive people
the pyrimids are not black culture
@buck wild....whose culture is it?
@@joanflemmingkendrick1107 Do you think those Egyptians were black??
@Ghoul300 Come on, bro....
@Ghoul300 Why would "we" lie about this??
@Ghoul300 You think Jesus is black?
Kudos to this guy for not taking this video down after realizing how schooled he got! 👍
And Taylor could've schooled him even harder by speaking near-native level French and Japanese after Reilly's cringe-worthy display of Hispanic enrichment at 1:53:48.
@Haseeb 2 How does it undermine his point? He is a well travelled worldly person, probably more well travelled than 95% of all Americans. You should listen to more of his talks.
@Haseeb 2 He doesn't constantly talk about these things. If you look at his work, he spends the vast majority of his time advocating for white interests. The accusation that he hates other races or looks down on them is not true, but it's also not really relevant.
@Haseeb 2 When has he said he wants other people beneath white people? Does he say it in this video?
@Haseeb 2 So he hasn't said he wants other people beneath white people. Crime stats are totally irrelevant to what you said. Why dodge the question when you brought it up?
Jesus this black guy is a clown Jared deserves much better opponent's.
Jared only has disgruntled lemmings that buy his 1950 pre civil rights ancient trash
@@marohan elaborate lol
@@marohan 1950? You mean when America had the highest quality of life of any country on earth? When one man’s paycheck could buy a home and provide for an entire family? When it was safe to leave your door unlocked at night? When the country was over 90% white? Oh yes, that was such a bad time.. lol
@@SoloTravelerOffTheBeatenPath that was for white people only. You had to have fair housing bills to prevent the systemic racism practices which have remnants to this day.
@@infidelhardcore7881 stop focusing on jareds hatred. He cant even speak on his religious affiliation because it is counterintuitive to what his parents taught of love n acceptance. Now that he is racist bigot preaching IQ n people cant come together as they do every single day, he will continue to lose ground.
Keep STEM, burn everything else to the ground.
+Eoretroaddecemberomnitempore It's Marxist post-modern bullshit. It's worse than useless; it's actively harmful.
***** "Although many colleges do admittedly have a far-left approach..."
They're not teaching Truth, they are indoctrinating in post-modern leftist ideology. If you don't want a mind-control state, it's probably not a good idea to have ideological indoctrination built into your places of learning.
***** It's not an infection that can be treated. It needs amputation.
Don’t burn everything! Just teach liberal arts from a Eurocentric and Christian perspective! Have peripheral classes for other cultures. Electives. No gender nonsense. In fact, segregate the schools by gender
Difference is never a strength. Think about it seriously for a moment. Take ten people. They each speak a different language. They all have diff ideologies. All from diff countries. Now give them a project to work on together. See where I am going with this? How *exactly* is this a strength in a technical or even a societal sense? Wouldn't similarity and like-mindedness be more of a strength in most real life situations??
Del its a common sense but don't expect that from liberal
@@TheAaronChand *All white people* voted for Trump? Generalize much? I suggest you look at the black and latino turnout. Record breaking numbers. In any case, I am Canadian so that isn't an issue for me. Take care.
@@Del-Canada I was born in Canada Vancouver at 27 weeks premature as well as and my Backround a Fijian Hindu Indian. My ancestors came from India and where taken out. Of India in 1879 to the Fijian islands. To work the colony during the British Empire rule of India. The Brtish Raj period. Remember both India and Canada where Brtish colonies. Before you say this is my country remember the weath of India helped built the settler colonies of Canada and Australia new Zealand.
@@TheAaronChand Okay.
@@TheAaronChand india could never build those Anglo nations
Let people decide for themselves whether diversity is good or bad. People should be able to decide this without the government forcing their agenda on them.
+Lou Nunya They have decided. People vote with their feet. Aside from a few major cities, whites live with whites and blacks live with blacks. Even in many of these big cities though, whites are in one corner and blacks are in another.
you inbreds came here on boats, not your "country."
james sampson eww. Edgy. What a stereotypical comment "inbreds"
Newsflash. Every square inch of this Earth has been conquered by a superior organism; repeat ad nauseam.
Patrick Henry just like muslims in europe.
Supremacy clause in the US constitution. I bet Taylor didn't teach you actual politics in his bullshit rant.
I give you credit for posting this debate in its entirety without disabling ratings or comments.
Here is the bottom line. What black country would a white or hispanic or black want to live in instead of a white built country? Black countries and Hispanic countries are not having a problem with immigration, legal or illegal!
Explain how whites went into Zimbabwe and South Africa. And in Latin America u have lots of immigration. U have Venezuelans going into Colombia, Trinidad, and Dominican Republic. You have Haitians going into DR, Brazil, and Argentina. You have Colombians, Peruvians, and Cubans in Ecuador.
Paying-For-Freedom Actually they do; the majority of the blacks and hispanics that legally immigrate to other countries are the smartest and or wealthiest. That means they are not in their own country helping to make it less shity...
Liberty or Death, the wealthiest people in the third world do not seek to migrate. It is the poor that are desperate to flee to other nations seeking a better life.
BallinNQnz Yes but that isn't the whole picture. The smartest ones with the highest IQ do want immigrate because they don't want to live in a shithole where they have to deal with all its problems. Rich people generally have a higher IQ hence the wealth.
I rather live in Barbados, Curaçao, Bahamas, Bermuda (predominantly black) than Serbia, Ukraine, Bulgaria, Russia, Hungary, Bosnia, And Latvia.
Taylor gives facts and historical relevance, the affirmative action professor dishes out feelings and conjecture. And there lies the problem.
A college student who wants to come to an event like this, with an obviously strong opinion, and expresses, an inexcusable 18 months after the fact, TOTAL ignorance about what actually happened at the Ferguson shooting! Audible jeers when Taylor simply cites the Obama Justice Dept's report confirming EVERY relevant fact vindicating Darren Wilson.
But she's "educated," see?
Hard to listen to such ignorance. It really proved Taylor's point.
Any honest person would have to say that Jared Taylor makes a lot of sense.
Duh-Duh-Duh.
Indeed then you should support Reparations with separation. 💯👍🏾
Indeed ha also believes in Reparations with Separation.
Why not?@haseeb2167
@@stillirise7813hell no, you ain’t getting no reparations. You can go back though.
32:06 The Roman Empire was not multicultural- when the Romans conquered new lands they made their new subjects adopt Roman customs. Romans, however, would adopt many of the local customs they liked. In this sense the goal of Rome was to homogenize the Empire- watering it down (culturally and ethnically) in the process. This was especially dangerous when absorbing slaves and weaker subjects- many of whom were slaves and losers for a reason (ie weaker willed, less skilled, etc were all contributing factors). No doubt this ancient "multiculturalism" of sorts contributed to Rome's decline.
+Zach Morley - I am arguing only for RACIAL diversity. Probably the key distinction between myself and Mr. Taylor is that he sees race as some sort of unique divider between people(s). In contrast, as a political scientist researching war and strategy, I can't help noticing that ALL of the most violent nations in the world appear to be mono-racial societies. If you use the sorting metric "recently involved in a major war (+) homicide rate significantly over the global average," the nations you get are: Chechnya, Ukraine, Rwanda, Bosnia, Somalia, Russia, Sudan, South Sudan, Iraq, Liberia, Afghanistan, Syria, and Kosovo. All of those nations are made up of multiple warring TRIBES, but they have essentially no racial diversity. Multi-racial societies - Canada, the USA, Hong Kong, Brazil, etc - aren't perfect. But racial diversity often correlates with decreased conflict, as tribal and clan groups come together to compete at the racial or national level.
In contrast to racial diversity, I oppose multi-culturalism. This is a key point: I am not a multi-culturalist. I define multi-culturalism in the standard conservative sense used by D'Souza (1995, 2000): the belief that all cultures are equal, and no dominant national identity can be super-imposed over sub-national racial and ethnic identities. That's exactly what you're referring to in late Imperial Rome, with her self-governing provinces and eventually the division of the Imperium. That's a crazy idea. Unlike Mr. Taylor, I do favor immigrants to the USA being selected on the basis of IQ and eagerness rather than race, and bringing their genetic potential and fine curries in with them. But, an over-arching national identity is in fact necessary to manage that sort of diversity and encourage miscengenation. The Romans fell NOT because they conquered Blacks and Gauls, who became pillars of the Empire. They fell because they abandoned the shared idea of "Roman Citizen," and split between East and West.
+Zach Morley
the THEOLOGICAL WEAPON used AGAINST the Romans was Christianity.
Wilfred Reilly Thanks for clearing that up.
I am not satisfied having a country where everyone simply puts up with each other. I want a country of kinship- authentic and rich unity. There are many races in America who on the whole meet our IQ/productivity standards, however they do not fit in. Most Chinese-Americans and Jewish Americans I have met see themselves as Chinese/Jewish first and American second. Some, who identify with neither identity, find themselves as atomized individualists.
Whether we're discussing inter-group violence, tribalism, inter-group apathy, or atomized individualism -- no society can survive.
members of a nation need deeply rooted commonalities with one another (race, religion, culture, tradition, etc.) for a society to truly flourish.
Zach Morley what acadmeic scholarly works do you have that support your claim .
Wilfred Reilly whoa now back up a bit. I have been a student of Roman society since I was a child and they have always fascinated me but I think you don’t quite understand what you’re suggesting. The Imperium, sure but what you’re not accounting for is the fall of the Republic. Let me explain because I would really like to hear your response in the correlation between Republican Rome and the the current United States.
First off, before I begin we need to make something clear. There is a massive difference between the Republic and the Imperium. If we are comparing that to the modern United States, we are in the period of Republican Rome, not the Imperium and that matters because how each version of Rome dealt with the multiple races and cultures was very different.
First off, Republican Rome was incredibly homogeneous. It’s original people were standoffish with the Socii. The entire client state system was based off of its desire to remain separate from the people they were in hegemony over. You keep your culture, we keep ours. You come when we call. The fall of the Republic and the rise of the Imperium was completely based on the Popularii and their constant pushing for citizenship for the Socii which was a losing argument. Even the lowest and poorest of the Roman citizens did not want Samnites and Etrurians having Roman citizenship. While the Romans used the Socii and the Socii absolutely wanted Roman citizenship, the Romans themselves were all about segregation tribally. As much as the Italian Allies wanted to be citizens, and as much as the Popularii such as the Grachus brothers pushed for it, they were not given citizenship until after the Marian Reforms and even then it was not taken well. From the moment the Grachii started using the Tribune office to push a multiracial society on the Roman public, the culture began changing until it finally started several Civil Wars and ended with Caesar and Octavian destroying the Republic and creating the Imperium. You get what I’m saying? The Roman virtues that Cato and Cicero talked about were utterly destroyed. The Republic and all of its virtues were destroyed. The Imperium maintained it’s multiracialism with Pax Romana. You might remember Tacitus talking about that. “They create a wasteland and call it ‘peace’.”
My point is that the Imperium was murderous in its nature. If your city was disorderly, they’d come and burn it down and kill everyone to maintain the peace. It was multi racial in that they allowed your race to continue existing, albeit with their boot on the Mediterranean world’s neck. Now, apply that to the United States.
The US is currently a Republic. Over only the last 50 years or so has it become multiracial. The virtues that it had which allowed it to grow from a regional power to the single most powerful nation on Earth is dying due to multiracialism. The World War 2 generation would absolutely without a doubt be appalled. Now here’s some statistics to make my point.
80% of minorities do not believe in the Second Amendment. They do not believe in absolute freeness of speech, while whites still overwhelmingly do. These are two basic values that puts power in the people’s hands. The modern day Popularii, the Democrats, pander to crowds of minorities because there is no way they’re seizing power while pushing the values they have over white Americans. Minorities want to be Americans but they neither understand its values nor do they want its values. They want the benefits while not assimilating. Which destroys the benefits too.
We are careening straight into an Imperium. One of two things will happen.
1) The Popularii win again. Nothing happens and we slowly degenerate from the white values we started with. That will likely lead to an Imperium of a sort.
2) A Civil War starts and the Conservatives win. The Republic gets a restart.
Either way, it’s unlikely things will resolve peacefully. The worst way things can go is the multiracial way, if we are studying how things went with Rome.
“Blue birds wanna be with blue birds red birds wanna be with red birds.”
-Muhammad Ali
Great reply. No one gave him a hard time for saying the exact same thing..... granted he did put it in much simpler terms.
Unfortunately this is not true. All of the birds want to be with the white birds, regardless of what they say.
My god, mr.Willfred Reilly missed the point using Bosnia as an example the way he did it.... The problem in ex Yugoslavia WAS forced diversity and suppression of differences among the different nations (Slovenians, Croatians, Serbs, Bosniacs, Albanians, Macedonians and Montenegrins) and, basically, three different cultures (and three religions too, if you will) with different backgrounds in such an extent as if it is a race differences (almost). Western nations (Croats andSlovenians) were under Austro-Hungarian rule (Croatian kingdom was in personal union with Hungarians, had its own parilament and ban (viceroy) all the time. Parts of Slovenia and Croatia were also under Venetian/Italian rule, so those cultures were part of them. The eastern nations, Serbs, Macedonians and, most of the time, people of bosnia that became nowadays Bosniacs and Albanians were under Turkish rule for centuries so it formed their way of thinking and behaviour. We, Croats and Slovenians, were swindled to submit to Serbian rule after the 1st W.W. and all the resistance was crushed by sheer force and in blood. The terror of Karađorđević's (Serbian dinasty) was harsh and nobody liked such a domination of one nation over others, so there was a backlash... It was a barrel of gunpowder just waiting for a spark to come because the most of people weren't satisfied with their position in that union, not even Serbs... So Croats and Slovenes were very much interested in forming their independent countries, and all other nations followed their lead and all of them formed their national states. This guy hasn't got the faintest idea about the situation here. Mr. Jared Taylor, on the other hand, knows what he is talking about without throwing arbitrary estimations... And he is using statistical evidence to support his claims, while his opponent tries to throw mud in our eyes trying to make hard statistical evidence unimportant which is not very intelligent thing to do...
And calling us tribes is a very racist way to address us.
@Peregrine: without being glib, thanks for again making my best point for me. Jared Taylor's whole argument, if you read for example "White Identity," is that RACE is a unique divider between people. This is the only reason for his otherwise confusing focus on atypical environments like prisons, during this debate and others. He appears to believe that an America containing Germans, Italians, Jews, Greeks, Hungarians, Serbs, Croats, and maybe Turks - and where Caucasians celebrated their identities much as Puerto Ricans and Mexicans do now - would be a peaceful place as long as there weren't Black people in it.
I think, while still respecting the man, that that's crazy nonsense. Your Bosnia story perfectly illustrates why. Yugoslavia was obviously 99.9% white, during the time of the wars of separation. The problem was that the country was literally Balkanized into dozens of different tribal factions - that's just the scientific terminology - on the basis of religion and language. You list most of these: Serbs, Croats, Bosniaks, Slovenes, Kosovar Albanians, and so on. The end result, in a totally mono-racial country, was a war of all against all that killed something like two million people.
That's not unusual. I do do serious scientific research, and in terms of homicide rate and tendency toward civil war, there is no
statistically significant difference between multi-RACIAL countries and
one-race states. The most racially diverse countries are places like New Zealand, Costa Rica, Canada, Bermuda, and Belgium. Multi-racial states are slightly more violent, but also slightly happier, taken on average - they certainly aren't hellholes.
In contrast, the sort of diversity that is dangerous is TRIBAL diversity, where sub-national linguistic or ethnic groups of the same race share a nation state. Tribal diversity like that in Bosnia IS a significant predictor of civil war; it roughly triples the odds of a "war between brothers" happening during any given decade. This, rather than race, was the problem in the former Yugoslavia, Sudan, Rwanda, and for that matter Nazi Germany. Racial diversity, if you read the Linked Fate or Pragmatic Group Consolidation literature in my discipline, in fact can help to resolve this problem - as small
tribes consolidate into larger groups like races ("white") for the
purpose of competition. Overall, the Canadas and Bermudas of the world are far more peaceful than the Lithuanias and Tanzanias - and that was my point against Taylor.
You cannot be more wrong... The problem were not in "tribes" and "tribalizm" (thank you for your racist remarks on behalf of Croats, Slovenes, Macedonians, Bosniacs, Albanians, Italians, Hungarians and others, even Serbs, who suffered because of Serbian imperialistic and nazistic goals ) , but in economically inefficient and unsuccesful country and unsuccesful (communist) system that could exist as such only during the cold war when the West used to support Yugoslavia financially donating huge ammounts of money just to keep it from openly joining Soviet Union... That country was bankrupt several times in my life and the last one was fatal, in the 80's... It was a federation of republics who had the right of secession according to Constitution.. The two most developed republics were Slovenia and Croatia and Miloshevich wanted to centralize the country when it failed to take the money from Slovenia and Croatia (very simplified way of saying it) instead of making reforms) in federal fund. Since Yugoslav army was in his hands and Serbs (close to 9 millions of them) outnumbered Croats (some 4,5 millions of them) he thought it would be piece of cake, especially when he took the weapons from Croatian Territorial Defense leaving us unarmed... Croatia and Slovenia also wanted to break up with the undemocratic one-party communist system, and MIloshevich wanted to keep the system as it was... So, the reasons were primarily economical, then political (one-party system against multiparty democracy)... With our "tribes", as you kindly called them as a good racist would do, fought also other "tribes" against Serbs... My brothers in arms were Hungarians, Slovaks, Ukrainians, Czechs, Italians, Macedonians, Germans, and, also Serbs (one of them from Serbia proper), and all of them are political Croats, which means the same as being political American (member of the political nation) although they are not Croats by nationality... You know, the citizen of France is a political Frenchman even when he is Russian by nation just like it is in every modern nation, so the same goes for Croatia...
No dude. You aren't getting Reilly's point. Croats and Serbs are the same race, correct? Never mind culture, religion, etc. That's exactly the point Reilly makes.
However, he is right about the fact that this is THE ONLY semi-successfull point he made. Because, eventually, JT crushes that issue with "I never said that the race is the only reason for tribalism". Whatever the case, JT destroys him. No matter how hard he tries to make it seem otherwise.
Also, nobody swindled you. Your people did what they thought was the best thing possible for survival of the nation. Otherwise, most of your land would have been:
1) partitioned b/w Italy and Serbia,
2) ravaged by Zeleni Kadar for a decade or so.
If you hadn't had Serbs to save your ass, Croatia would have been Zagreb + its suburbs. But in a matter similar to African Americans, you Croats blame Serbs anyways. No matter what, you would have found reason to blame them. But hey, look at you now: on your own for quarter of the century! You're doing so well
:-P
@@wilfredreilly8261 mingling people together only forces them to embrace their origin cuz they are nit from the origin of the people that are living with them.You cant make a assimalation program as you like so much because it DIESNT WORK-not in america not in the balkans not even in africa or the sout africa.Look up the mentality in south africa.People understand that it wasnt the tidays's people fault that their ancestors came there.They want them gone because they are different in raciality which is FOREIGN to them also.That mentality is everywhere when you have mingling and you cant change it-it has been tryed but failed every single time.
1:30:29 They get triggered just from Jared saying "All you Blacks..." but many Blacks openly say "All you Whites..." Hahaha..
They don't refer to whites as "European Americans"
I’m no Jared Taylor fan, however, Mr. Taylor clearly won this debate. Diversity is very detrimental to one’s group. If America means grouping traditional-minded people, illegal immigrants and homosexuals together then that’s an America I don’t want for my ppl and self.
Malcom X would've agree more with MR, Taylor as well. He knew multiculturalism needed to be a choice not forced.
Based black king
well said bro!!👍🏾
@@davidjd123Riley basically advocated for white ethnocide. That’s the main component I got from this.
Jared won this hands down Trump 2020
There's the sort of neutral, unbiased, review I've grown used to in the comments!
Distribute the red-pill values to friends and families. Allegiance to the natural order. Never apologize.
Trump will not save the ethnic majority of the US. Trump is a traitor to white people.
If jares won, when are you guys leaving 2 start the ethnostate
@Andrea Mendenhall That's exactly it. Regardless about how you feel about race realism or stuff like that, it is an indisputable fact that if America remained homogenous, a lot of horrible things that happened in our country would have never happened. That much is impossible to argue against.
"In fifty years there will be no Amazonians in the Amazon. And that's a good thing."
I mean...in all likelihood, the Amazon rain forest will not be populated primarily by members of indigenous tribes in 50 years, as major states like Brazil begin to build modern integrated cities there. Do you see this as a negative?
@@wilfredreilly8261 Yes.
@@wilfredreilly8261
Brazil is a dysfunctional state. They have multiple gated miniature cities where the upper middle class isolate themselves from diversity, degeneracy, and dysfunction.
@@wilfredreilly8261 lmfao...
@@wilfredreilly8261 a plate of diverse foods across the plate and you want to stir it all together so the unique flavors are lost.
LMAO@ 1:33:06 - "with words you can say things and kinda make ppl have a different perception.... Ferguson and Baltimore fought white supremacy.... Christopher Columbus' seed saw blacks in North America yo.... WE WUZ KANGZ.... America built by slaves.....uh uh uh NFL yo" BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!
It’s amazing to me that a bumbling degenerate such as he is at an institution of higher learning.
It’s nice to know you’re obsessed with us
Cringeworthy!!
@Jamie R Deem that's harsh. I hope u were just kidding.
Bc To put down his value as a citizen just because of the short 2min question he posed. U don't know him. Period. U just know statistics. So ease up. That young man could be a gem.
@Jamie R Deem
Ur statistics are important. But not for this argument.
I'm talking about judging an individual fairly. This two minute question may not prove this young man is a scholar in ur book- but completely dismissing his citizenship? His worth? Value?
The argument is,
U called him not worthy of living life in America. When, u don't know his deeds, his GPA, his upbringing, his specific stregnths and weaknesses. u two r complete. Strangers. So what r u judging him on? statistics. Which can be helpful. But they are not gospel.
Stereotypes are not Gospel either.
Stereotypes are usually negative and exaggerated. Like asians are bad drivers. That stereotype comes from the evidences that asians are usually far sighted. They're vision is not as good close up as Europeans. But the bad drivers thing is a myth (as far as i know.)
U don't even know if that statistic for 60% of the crime is accurate for where they are. (because statistic are not accurate everywhere. 60% of the crime in Alaska is not done by blacks. The national statistic is a picture is as a nation. Crime rates can b lower or higher in different cities & states. And huge outlets of crime and black population of low educated and immoral men like in Baltimore,chicago,etc r going to spike the data. While quieter towns in states like Alaska will dull it down. )
What I'm saying is, your going to loose out on good opportunities to actually enjoy the benefits of diversity- because there is benefits tthat can be enjoyed( u may not think the benefits r worth it.) if you do not judge individuals holistically and as individuals.
U should understand this by how Ford was able to destroy a man's reputation by uttering "victim" in a crowded room and pointing fingers. What made more sense?:
1. To judge kavanaugh by the entirety of his life. Decisions actions and all.
2. To judge kavanaugh by what he said only at the hearings. And for only 2 minutes in one particular segment.
It makes more sense to withhold harsher judgements (like he is a rapist or he isn't worthy to be in our country)
When u know the entire person. Because otherwise u sound... And i know u probably don't care- but I'm trying to help U- u sound racist.
And on a more real note-
Certainly, you may feel worthy to live in America.
But all your good deeds and sense of achievement are filthy rags in the sight of Almighty God. Everyone on their best day, is a lowly deprived sinner.
U are not better then him. And i am not better then u. And vice versa X infinity.
Which is why this argument to get rid of blacks based on merit is sorta misleading. Because you'd have to assume white people are better then blacks & have better merits. And in christianity that simply isn't true.
White people are the reasons for their failures just as black people are.
And collectively the nation is failing because of immorality and sin, & not repenting. not because of a certain ppl group.
How can anyone say race diversity is a strength, then celebrate the idea of there only being one race as a result of all the races mixing? If he can imagine the Country being a better place because everyone was one mixed race, doesn't that support the argument that a homogenized Country is better then a diverse Country? That very thought won the debate for Taylor because his entire point was just that. The difference was that Taylor was not promoting the idea of all races being destroyed to create one homogenized race.
Ezra Ch:9
Perfectly stated it in a nutshell.
Yes! You’re exactly right!
People who truest support diversity believe in some level of separation between races and cultures. In order to truly value diversity it must be protected not destroyed by mixing it out.
Extremely well put
Because diversity is a code word for white genocide.
TL/DW:
Jared Taylor wins the debate.
It was like Jared Taylor was debating a toddler.
'The better the food, the arts and the athletics'
Always the answer when it comes to diversity. Taylor should have added the caveat 'Name me one benefit of diversity besides the food'.
The fact that this is a serious argument, food ans sports, for the benefits of diversity says much about the level of education this man has received.
+LyovMyshkin - by your own logic "the arts, the athletics." This was, by the way, the shortest and weakest of my arguments. I gave "a shout" to the conventional claim, then moved on to genetic diversity and the reduction of tribal and clan violence.
@@wilfredreilly8261 all your arguments were weak like the way those students "learn"
@@wilfredreilly8261 Dude. Seriously. Check out your comments section. CLEARLY everyone favors Jared's side. Just give it up 🤣 I'm laughing so hard at the things everyone has called you out on. Love reading these 🤭😁
Not just food or the arts, but music such as jazz, which jared loves so well, rock and roll, gospel, soul, pop, rock, (not heavy metal), mowtown, reggae, blues, Hip Hop..... but not the corporate bastardisation of hip hop. All derived from blacks. Oh and blacks have contributed to classical music and opera as well.
@Blut und Boden so if white food is so great why did they need Spices from my ancestors in India or from Indonesia or China during clonialsim
The quality [lack thereof] of the students' questions is telling. These kids are barely fit to work at Kmart let alone be on a campus. Proving Jared's point.
@Racialist Slayer Yeah, the questions they asked him in the video clip you're commenting on. You know, the one I'm commenting on also. If you click play (the triangular-shaped icon) and listen to the clip, you'll hear the students asking inane questions.
@Racialist Slayer No. It's self-evident but - even if it weren't - I don't feel compelled to explain it to you lol.
@Racialist Slayer "So what you're saying is..." I'll stop you there, Cathy, I couldn't care less what you think of my comment, nor their questions, nor Taylor, nor anything. What part of that are you struggling with lol?
@Racialist Slayer I noticed this too. Some of the students had poor articulation or grammatical errors. Some of them didn't understand the proper tone to use for this setting. Sounded like they were just shouting down someone at a bar or something. Moderator had to prompt them to wait in line. There might have been only 1 or 2 that were truly bad, but the general impression was bad because of certain patterns repeating. A couple asked good questions.
They have 50 iq points by average and ebonics @@jackashford8881
"Racial Diversity is Our Strength" rings as true as "Israel is Our Greatest Ally".
Bu..but...but I was told we are Judeo/Christian as a mantra over and over again,what gives ?
Up until 1970 or so we were.@@hossbonaventure_ceo6693
Too bad Israel doesn't believe diversity is their strength. The Jewish ethno-state that is allowed to discriminate without issue.
Jewish people are racially diverse ethnically Jewish. It should be obvious who’s behind this.
Jared Taylor sounds so radical at first and then wins people over with logic every time
"The pyramids are black culture" hahaha literally we wuzing on the stage
I'm very certain black people were heavily involved in that event.
@@AlexGarcia-ze4yg I'm very certain that they were almost exclusively GRUNT LABOR. 🤣
@@johnharrison6745 LMFAO! Meanwhile your ancestors were north of the Danube scratching shyte from their buttcracks with fishbones, running naked through the Black Forest howling at the moon like dogs.
Not even worth mentioning in any of the biblical texts from that era-- not even as grunts.
@Haseeb 2 The point is that you were not "kangz" you were low caste laborers.
Da whitey did dis dah whitey did dat
I really like Wilfred Reilly for his intellect and fast wit; it's clear, however, that in this debate, the professor could not contain his rudeness. Not previously knowing who Jared Taylor is (until I google him after the debate), I don't find Taylor's arguments at all racist or even inciteful.
When it was put to the test it failed
anything can be inciteful depending on the people. and thats nobody's fault.
@@davidjd123 he was rude
What a dishonest debater, when he brought those kids on stage at the end - that was just pathetic. I lost all the sympathy for him I was building up.
Jared Taylor speaks three languages.
My understanding is that he sees and appreciates the diverse cultures and wants to preserve them all. If a caucasian prefers to surround himself with other caucasians that should be as socially acceptable as any other person of another race preferring the same thing.
I live in Seattle. You can Imagine how I am treated when I express my views of not wanting to be culturally enriched. Women avoid me like the plague, I end up getting into fights quite often because I refuse to say I enjoy listening to rap music and hanging around people who are nothing like me. It's so unfortunate that we really do not have the luxury of "Freedom of association" today without being cast as a white supremacist. These cultural marxists are dead-set on telling everyone else how to live their lives and being the judge of their choice being right or wrong. Really sad.....
@@christophergraves3862 it's not 1930 grow up
@@TheAaronChand Yeah it's was worse than the 30s. The average IQ of the country is dropping and we're more dysfunctional than ever. You call that a success?
@@thothamon9046 it's hypocritical for Jared Taylor to complain about foreigners when he himself was born in Kobe Japan. under Jared own logic the Japanese government should have kicked him out of Japan for not being ethnicity Japanese. If your born in a country that's your country it doesn't matter if its a white guy like Jared who was born in Japan. A Chinese decent person born in Italy. Or the ansctors of the Ulster Plantation of Ireland which where settler colonizers sent by England. Who where usually from Scotland or England. Ireland became there nation.
@@TheAaronChand There are good foreigners are bad foreigners. The difference? Genetics.
I ''agree'', with diversity...I ''drank the kool-aid'' of the melting pot idea; but I do respect Jared Taylor's and other's right to associate with whatever race they choose, I have no issue with that. I will say that Dr, Reilly did not even actually debate, he basically just said, ''haha, this guy is old and all the cool people want diversity and agree with me because its accepted socially.. = FAIL
Well, I also pointed out that the thirty or so most violent countries are all uni-racial. This is probably the key point against Mr. Taylor, who argues - insanely, to me as a Political Scientist - that race is sort of the key human divider in terms of violence within societies. In fact, racial diversity in societies with any sort of functional assimilation plan causes no statistically significant increase in violence. The most RACIALLY diverse nations on Earth are Belgium, Bermuda, Canada, Costa Rica, Fiji, France, Malaysia, and New Zealand. The USA's right up there. There are some violent outliers further down on the list (Venezuela), but most of these places are hardly war zones. What causes violence is "castle keep" TRIBAL and linguistic diversity, which is usually found in fairly primitive states that haven't yet entered global markets and achieved mature racial and class diversity. Taylor may think that a USA full of passionate 1920s-style Italians, Irishmen, Germans, Greeks, and Russian Jews would be a peaceful utopia until Blacks arrived. I disagree.
I don't believe he sad that, but rather that more a like people will have create lesser problems... and this is fact, just look at crime rates. Look Sweden crime rate before intake of people from Arabic and African background and current one?! I actually worked in most of the countries you listed and I bet you, this countries are far removed from coherent but rather suspicious indeed... yours example proved Jarad's point perfectly. Fiji - military upraising against Indians (from India). NZ struggles with compensation after compensation for taking "advantage" of Maori, treating Maori with special concessions (privileged), I could list more but hope that when one claims this countries as good example I would actually spend some time getting to know them. I would claim Singapore is one of this countries that multiculturalism had worked, but is very very strict country.
@Piotr - you have worked in "most of" Belgium, Bermuda, Canada, Costa, Fiji, France, Malaysia, NZ, the USA, and Venezuela? I envy you, my man. But, on to points - my argument here is quite simple. In terms of homicide rate and tendency toward civil war, there is no statistically significant difference between multi-RACIAL countries and mono-racial states. Multi-racial states are slightly more violent, but also slightly happier. This finding, and the entire idea of diversity as a (non-) predictor of war, is actually the subject of my next academic paper, which I plan to submit to the International Journal of Political Science and Diplomacy. Perhaps I should dedicate it to Mr. Taylor.
The sort of diversity that is dangerous is TRIBAL diversity, where sub-national linguistic or ethnic groups of the same race share a nation state. Tribal diversity IS a significant predictor of civil war; it roughly triples the odds of a "war between brothers" happening during any given decade. This, rather than race, was the problem in Bosnia, Sudan, Rwanda, and for that matter Nazi Germany. Racial diversity, if you read the Linked Fate or Pragmatic Group Consolidation literature in my discipline, in fact can help to resolve this problem - as small tribes consolidate into larger groups like races ("white") for the purpose of competition. You had one excellent point about Fiji. But, overall, the Canadas and Bermudas of the world are far more peaceful than the Lithuanias and Tanzanias - and that was my point against Taylor.
thanks would love to hear more....
Jared Taylor is obviously not praising other mostly uni-racial cultures. He's praising Western culture, a culture undoubtedly made by white Europeans, which ironically, by virtue of it's own emphasis on personal freedoms, allowed racial diversity to become prevalent. The US isn't a war zone for a few reasons, some being geographical, others political and military, but I would absolutely not attribute any of those reasons to cultural diversity.
I really did not hear much substantive input from yourself during the debate (an example being when you brought up a multitude of racially diverse students, as if Jared Taylor either didn't know they existed or hadn't realize that they proved the greatness of cultural diversity). I believe a longer sit-down interview between yourself and Jared Taylor, without a live audience, will show that your current positions are based on a shallow concepts that don't withstand much empirical prodding. I'd be very interested in that conversation.
With all that said, I thank you for making this discussion available on the internet, and for actually engaging in further conversations and clarifications with viewers. I believe that intellectual debate is needed, and that it takes a very mentally capable person to go up on stage and not babble like an imbecile (which you didn't do, but a few questioners did).
This was a debate between a salesman and an intellectual. Reilly being the salesman and Jared Taylor being the intellectual. Reilly constantly misrepresented Jared's arguments and sold his argument more on the basis of pandering to the audience. The last question was the best question, if you make everyone the same beige tone you are creating a homogenous society and also committing genocide.
Brazil is diverse and isn't desirable. It borders on a failed state. The left always ignore this inconvenience. The truth is, the USA is becoming less functional and a less desirable country to live in as it becomes more diverse. If diversity were truly a strength, it should be getting stronger, not weaker. This fact alone debunks the 'diversity is a strength' mantra.
Completely agree, london is 37% British. Think of that the capital not even native majority people don’t even want to visit anymore.
Reilly had no rational responses to Taylor's points. Pathetic. Parading the people onto the stage was an empty stunt.
I love how an all black college is promoting diversity. The irony runs strong here.
You apparently didn't Bing us. KYSU is the 8th most diverse college in the USA - we're half Black, about 40% white, and have a ton of Southeastern Natives and Asian exchange students. Many - I won't say most - HBCUs are remarkably diverse. Thus, I mean, all the white people asking questions.
@@wilfredreilly8261 hence*
Lmfao a "professor" you're a fucking idiot
IRELAND ENGLAND SCOTLAND AND WELSH ARE THE SAME PEOPLE
More or less. High Neanderthal admixtures and seconded in comparison to Cro-Magnon brain capacity only to our Scandinavian brethren.
and cherokee lol
Reilly’s whole argument is filled with “I think” or “I feel”. Taylor’s was full of data and stats. This is consistent in all the debates between the “left” and “right”. The left is all about how I feel and what I think. Let’s use data not feelings.
"Black culture, the pyramids and the like." We wuz flying pyramids and shiiiit! Wakanda now!
You are aware that there were pyramids in more than one society, right? This "Blacks didn't build the pyramids!" line keeps cropping up in the comments. Well, no, we didn't build the ones in the Yucatan Jungle. But, the ones located in the former Meroe, Zimbabwe, and Egypt "North" of Aswan we can certainly take credit for. No? The point here is that cultural and human glories endure even if the exact genetic blood-stock group that created them no longer exists.
@@wilfredreilly8261 the pyramids of sub-Saharan Africa are glorified piles of stones. When ever anyone talks of "the pyramids" it always refers to the ones in Egypt. The others are specified by their location
@@wilfredreilly8261 lol what a massive cop out. No one NO ONE who hears "the pyramids" said in this generic way to mean Aztec or Cambodian. And you KNOW this. Why are you such a dishonest worm?
The fact that there are debates about it just goes to show that diversity is in fact not "our greatest strength."
Jared was a gentleman to refrain from talking to you in Japanese at the very end.
Listening to Jared Taylor is a privilege.
Also pretty nasty of Wilfred Reilly to butt in snarky remarks while not allowing Jared Taylor to respond, not what a gentleman does in a debate
Reilly's argument falls apart on the basis that Jared never argues that the absence of racial diversity would therefore mean an end to all violence. Merely pointing out examples of violence within those of the same race does not negate nor make any less horrible violence and strife between different races.
I do find it interesting that even though professor Reilly is arguing for diversity, his hope is that one day everyone will be one race and there will be no more diversity. So who's really arguing for diversity in this debate? Just a thought.
That still kills diversity! I believe we should fight culture and race diversity back and stop it. People from all races will lose what makes them unique and special if everyone mixes. That would be a very sad outcome and everyone regardless of race loses big time just think about that for a while.@haseeb2167
Taylor won hands down
New title:
Jared Taylor Debates A Peanut.
Wilfred Taylor is a professor! He rambles, and is incoherent.
I am not a believer in a white ethnicity that is monolithic. I think that culture matters more than biology. I am also a Christian. However, I agree with just about everything Taylor says. Diversity for the sake of diversity is utterly meaningless and potentially disastrous. It upsets me that Christians self segregate.
I'm half Asian and half white and also a Christian. It's hard to deny that racial differences cause issues.
@@christianthames2302
I am not so sure about racial differences. Some cultures put emphasis on racial traits while others do not. If you are different in any way, you will stick out like a sore thumb.
However, the key issue is CULTURE. Does a group of people have enough in common to get along or not? Do they believe in the same God, value the same things, share a similar morality code, etc
I do not think something superficial like person A likes burritos person B likes hot dogs is a really big deal though.
@@gideondavid30 different races come with different cultures. American whites and American blacks have totally different cultures and beliefs despite living in the same country.
These differences cause issues.
@@christianthames2302 take note: american whites not ALL whites. There is no guarantee that people who share common racial traits will share a common culture. And African American blacks are not identical to africans either. The question is do American blacks share enough culture with american whites to live together peacefully and cohesively.cohesive. Europe was influenced heavily by Christian ideas which were Middle Eastern and not white. Culture is shaped by ideas and can be imported and/or exported.
They self segragate naturally. Nothing wrong with it. When we are all in heaven we wont be bound by our natures
To openly admit that the removal of an entire race and culture is a "Good thing" is not only abhorrently racist, but down right evil. Wilfred Reilly, while I very much disagree with your views on the subject of diversity, I can appreciate your honesty in taking joy in the removal of the white race.
@Racialist Slayer at 1:12:10 and forward. Around the time that Mr. Reilly made the very odd statement of saying pyramids are "Black Culture". I'm not sure which pyramids he is referring to, as pyramids have been built by various cultures worldwide during different periods. I am not sure how he can make the claim that pyramids are black culture unless he's more specific.
@Racialist Slayer I just gave it to you. He literally says that it's a good thing. If you are hearing impaired then I understand the confusion you seem to be having. If you're not hearing impaired and lack comprehension abilities, and want to play a semantics game, then you're just wasting both of our times.
@Racialist Slayer those are some mighty big words. I'm not a doctor like yourself, and generally don't attempt to diagnose strangers from a college debate. I do find it fascinating you can make those claims with little to no evidence. Actually, I'm pretty sure doctors don't diagnose people with mental disorders after a single session. I have to ask, what am I claiming victomhood too? I made an obvious observation and formed an opinion.
@Racialist Slayer oh I see doctor. So I'm a fan now. How did you come to this conclusion? I didn't make up anything. The guy said no whites is a good thing, period. You're truly fascinating. First you misconstrued what was said, and claimed the guy didn't say what he said. Then you wanted to play doctor and do a piss poor job at psychoanalysis on two people you don't know, then you start lobbying false claims at me. You're a clown. You know, even though no one offline likes to hear what you have to say, there's a place for people like you. It's called Twitter.
I agree much more with Jared Taylor, but we have to at least appreciate that Dr. Reilly is willing to have a debate with him. So many in academia would not allow this at all and in fact would love nothing more than to censor any voices critical of racial diversity.
What's to appreciate? It's not hard for him to go debate in front of a crowd that agrees with him
@@dluvv19761 The crowd may agree with his position, but I am not at all sure they agree that having a debate on the subject should be allowed. And even if they do, increasingly more and more of the left is calling for censorship that may well not even allow Jared Taylor's ideas to be expressed.
I guarantee that he wouldn’t do it again
It was a mistake on Dr. Reilly's part to have this debate, which is why no one else would entertain a debate with Mr. Taylor. Based on how he handled the debate, it appears as if he had this idea that Mr. Taylor was just some idiot racist that he'd easily make to look like a fool, and so didn't do much planning. It would have worked out nicely for Dr. Reilly if he invited an actual racist maniac to argue against. So while I'm glad a debate like this was allowed to happen, you likely won't see anything like it again.
@@MechaWingZero You couldn't have a debate like that today without riots. For speakers as popular as these two, there are very few people in the audience and It seems likely many didn't come as a form of protest, or fear of protest, or fear they could be cancelled if seen in the audience.
"If you are not a bigot, you ASSUME these are the results of historical.." 38:20 Didn't you go to law school? You don't assume anything.
Jared Taylor is awesome. No wonder Twitter and others ban him.
This is an awesome debate. It absolutely furthers the conversation about race and brings us closer to that magical day when these topics can be discussed openly, freely and without stigma. Thanks for posting Dr. Reilly!
The "magical day" will be when freedom of association is protected and respected under law.
Taylor is an intellectual who stayed on point and supported his arguments.
Reilly is not an intellectual who couldn't stay on point, couldn't identify an argument related to the debate, and offered no substantive support for his views. He sounded more like a preacher who was looking to be liked and cheered not someone who was in a debate.
I'm glad we can finally agree that genocide is not bad
+Shlomo Sheklesteinowitz We are winning chaim !! Masel Tov !!
+Rabbi Zyklon Brausebadstein We crushed these people and made them massacre each other in WW1 and WW2 when they were dominating the World. Now that we have empowered other Races of the World they don't stand a chance, it's like David vs Goliath. Look at their only hope Trump his daughters are married to 2 of our Boys, and Trump had to kiss our feet when he spoke at AIPAC, he called Israel and America as cultural brothers.
+Shlomo Sheklesteinowitz So, we should pre-heat to 2500*F then?
Shlomo Sheklesteinowitz this is the reason why y'all asses won't be here in 200 years ... yeeeeeaaaaahhh
Shlomo Sheklesteinowitz aaah u agree tell Israel
In our great " free society", Jared Taylor has been censored by all since the time of or around this debate.
Yeah. No one would dare even host such a debate topic nowadays--even if J. Taylor were not involved.
He said somalia is a mono culture. As an east african, THAT IS FALSE. Somalia is extremely tribal and fights many wars based off tribal conflict. This black guy is so misinformed.
The reason there arent often debates like this, is because Jared decimated the Universities representative. It took alot of guts, or alot of hubris for them to even keep this up.
One opening I wouldnt have left alone, is at the end, where he boasts that "In one hundred or two hundred years, there won't be any more blacks or whites, just people who look like me". Not only is this a declaration that he himself prefers his own kind, but doesnt this defeat his whole argument if diversity lands you right back where you started with homogeneity?
Brilliant presentation by Mr. Taylor.
If diversity were so wonderful , it would happen naturally. Government would not have to enforce it.
Insightful debate, both sides. But the 2nd debater continually throwing the word "bigot," obviously towards the 1st debater was uncalled for. And as a Ky'ian that's had experiences in both the north and the south, the references towards "northern-blacks have higher IQ's than southern whites..." is not accurate. Go to DePaul university for 1 semester and that narrative is blow outta the water!
BTW~ Louisville is KY's WORSE city to visit! The social-justice judges have DESTROYED that city, it's now CRIME-RIDDEN!
The high schools are EXTREMELY diverse, and there is mob violent EVERYDAY!
Blacks OVERWHELMING are the hostile race amongst all that diversity."
Diversity is positive when ALL RACES are TREATED EQUAL UNDER our Constitutional Law! My heritage is Irish, German, Cherokee Indian, as w/many "whites" in southern/eastern Ky...
Honestly "whites" are just over talkin' about race CONSTANTLY! Why can't content of character matter anymore?!?
Our American history SHOULD have taught us to view identity (politics) as Booker T wrote in his autobiography, and NOT Dubois... Dubois was obsessed w/race! Ironically he was also born into a "middle- class" free-black family that owed land, and worked that land as well...He NEVER lived as a slave. He was a talkin' not a doer...
Booker T was born in the south as slave, but achieved freedom after the civil war. He valued very hard work ethics, he wasn't obsessed w/race and/or oppression. He was obsessed w/SELF-educating, PERSONAL responsibility, living in peace w/whites... Resulting in establishing a relationship w/President Lincoln, thus Booker T received funding to help him build many schools in the south...
Unfortunately, TODAY the majority of minority (and white) college/university professors teach the Dubois mentality to young people, opposed to Booker T's... Which in my personal opinion is an INJUSTICE to our present-day college/university students...
There was no debate it was a slaughter! Jared Taylor 2000 IQ
Just six years later, there are no major universities or college campuses in the US willing to host such a debate
Yep the Left went from opposing the Elite to opposing whites as the new elite. This keeps working class white ppl feeling divided between the nonwhite working class as theyre expected to sacrifice their identity for the sake of other ones.
Jared Taylor recently gave a speech at Arizona State University this year.
My heart wants to believe in diversity, but my mind tells me otherwise!
By the way, I'm surprised Dr. Reilly didn't just come right out and shout, "Hey, where da white women at?!"
This guy is a "professor"? God help us all.
Mr. Jared Taylor speaks Japanese fluently while Mr. Reilly's Spanish is substandard, some of these American collage student can hardly speak English.
He was obviously hoping to get cheers for using the language itself and that nobody would understand what he was actually saying. "I love tacos", how utterly embarrassing.
Ahh, okay so you can't learn Spanish/Portuguese without completely replacing the demographics of Europeans that built the country. And no, Blacks did not create or build America anymore than a nail built a shed.
That language you spoke at the end was a European one by the way, Mr. Reilly. The United States as it was intended and designed can not exist without the European ethnicities that define it's existence. It was created by the Founding Fathers as a white ethno-state. ('Whites' = European)
Reily's argument that diversity does not cause conflict is to name that diversity causes other conflicts via religion, ethnicity and culture instead of just race.
You, and all progressives are in a battle with human nature and observed reality.
It was called imperialism colonization
Spanish and Portuguese are Europen western languages. The Spanish Empire and Portuguese where doing colonies and settler colonialism before the Brtish Empire England did.
The Founders of the United States hated other white people. Ben Franklin was Xenophobic towards Germans. And Germans are white people from western Europe. Do you seriously think English settler colonizers. Wanted Polish Russians Swedish Czechs Hungarians. Slovenia to live in a English settler colony. Franklin didnt want Germans. Comming in large numbers.
@@TheAaronChand That's a non sequitur
Jared won this argument hands down in my opinion! I went to prom with a black girl, some of my best friends are black, but this dude has a point, even if it makes you feel gross. Humans of all types can be really fucked up, and horrible to each other . Race has no monopoly on brutality... This is a rough convo, congrats 👏 for having it
And for clarity, my last name is Lopez
And ya, it sucks I have to say that, but I wouldn't want to be called a white supremacist would I???
People are People, horrible, nice, generous, amazing, beautiful, fucked up People all around.
Did you.... raw dawg her?
@@big4330 Did you just turn 12, or are you an idiot?
Good debate (Jared won), but I’m shocked that the Africans didn’t riot! 😳😮
They didnt want.to.prove him right + go to jail. It'd be more humiliatimg
Jared Taylor wasted his time on this! When he dies it will mean nothing
Whites are done! Diversity and feminism destroyed the white man 😂🤣
Comment section is the dislike button for Professor Reilly🤣🤣🤣