David, do you have like a pdf material or word with all the references against Muhamed and quran so i can take, translate into my own language and show to my community? Bless you
Hamas, Al Queda, ISIS, Hazbulla, and so on have all 1 thing in common; Islam. I don't want to sound crazy but have you guys ever red the quran? There are passages in there where Mohammed calls for the killing of all Jews and that "the last hour" would not come until Muslims slaughter the Jews (Sahih Muslim 2922). And there's passages in there saying Muslims should not take Christians and Jews as friends because they are friends of eachother and Mohammed called Christians and Jews "unjust people" (Surah Al-Ma'idah - 51). I am afraid these groups will not disappear until Islam disappears and people realize it's not a religion of peace but of war and terror, not all Muslims are bad people; some are Muslim by customs of the country they live in and family they have but never really read the quran and just try to live a good life. The reason why Mohammed has this hatred against the Jews and Christians is because when Mohammed went to the Jews to prove to his followers he was a prophet (he said the Jews would confirm he was a prophet), the Jews send him packing and told him in his face he was wrong and not a prophet (and the Jews were right); that is where his hatred for Jews started. And likewise the Christians rejected Mohammed as a prophet, which caused his hatred for Christians. Islamists treat Mohammed like more than a prophet, they treat him like Messiah; Mohammed is a false prophet and false messiah leading many astray into hatred for one another even to the point of death. All Israel is doing right now is self-defense, the land called Israel was never called Palestine and there was no Palestinian identity until the Muslims and Arabs made it up in the mid-late 1900's; it's a Islamic lie, because in Islam they are allowed to lie in war times; there has been war on and off since Israel's reestablishment and the aggressors are Islamic countries and Islamic terrorist groups funded by Islamic countries. The land Israel; to who'm does it belong in the first place? The Arabians Muslims, falsely identifying as Palestinians, argue it belongs to them but let's take a look at history and facts: Before 1200 BC the land belonged to the Sea Peoples In and after 1200 BC it belonged to Israelites In 957 BC the Israelites build the first Temple In 722 BC the Assyrians invade Israel and take over In 586 BC the Babylonians invade the land and take over and causes the displacement of Israel In 515 BC Israelites return to Israel and the second Temple is build In 332 BC Alexander the great invades Israel and takes over In 63 BC the Romans came and took over Israel but Israel was still considered a vassal State at that time - 0 BC passing by the birth, life, death, resurrection and ascension of Jesus Christ of Nazareth we go into AD - In 70 AD the temple is destroyed In 136 AD the Romans (ruled by Emperor Hadrian) named the area of modern Israel "Paleshtina" as an insult to the Jews after the Bar Kokhba revolt (because the Philistines were the enemy of ancient Israel). In 343 AD the Christians take over the Roman empire, this was not a violent take over; it was by conversion In 395 AD the Romans split In 636 AD the Muslims invade, forcibly converting the Christians and Jews to Islam or killing them or enslaving them or running them off by force In 1099 AD the Christians recapture Jerusalem and the surrounding areas, establishing the Crusader States In 1291 AD the Mamluk Muslims invaded and took over the area, forcefully converting the Christians and Jews back to Islam In 1517 AD the Ottoman empire invaded and conquered the region In 1918 AD after World War I the Christians took back over the region, this was taken by England In 1948 AD England "gives" the land back to the Jews and Israel is reestablished. In 1948 AD it was not "given back" to the Jews exactly; there was a war following the 1947 UN partition plan, later, in 1948, following the declaration of the establishment of the State of Israel on May 14, 1948, Arabs launched a military intervention in what became the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, resulting in Israel gaining control of more land than allocated in the UN plan. In present time, Israel owns the land and gave the Arabs who identify as "Palestinians" a piece of land called Gaza, in return Hamas (ruler of Gaza) sends Islamic terrorists to kill innocent civilians in Israel on October the 7th (just to name one example of the many examples) and declares Jihad; they want to take over Israel by force through murder, terrorism and destruction. So who has the right to the land? Israel. But let's give more facts and details: - If we look into the Bible and the Torah it is clear it belongs to Israel (the Jews). - Jews owned the land for 1411 years, the Muslims for 1090 years and the Christians for 515 years; so by years it belongs to the Jews. - If the land belongs to the Natives of the land; the Natives of the land are Jews so it belongs to the Jews - The "Philistines" are the ancient enemy of the Jewish people (which are not the Arabs that call themselves "Palestinians" today, and those people (the Philistines) are long gone from the world today) - The Roman empire called the land "Paleshtina" as an insult as mentioned above and not "Palestine" actually, "Palestine" is just a misinterpreted of the word "Paleshtina" - The matter of the fact is that "Palestine" and the "Palestinian people" are not more than a fiction, a fake, a propaganda made by the Arabs and Muslim world - Israelis have no other country to go to, and this is the decisive truth that helped Israel win all its wars. Israelis have nowhere to go, therefore every war and every conflict is an existential threat to Israel. Muslims have about 50 countries, to live, go to, etc. Facts, history and common sense says Israel belongs to the Jews and Islam is a threat to every human life; the Jew, the Christian and even the unbeliever.
A Muslim once asked me how I thought I could ever talk to God if I didn’t speak Arabic? I asked him in return if he actually and really thought God only spoke one language. I told him that even he could speak 2 languages. He stared at me.
@jazzymilesmiles3308well Aramaic. But that’s not the point: the point is that God is above all things. How anyone can think that if you don’t speak one language out of literally thousands that He wouldn’t talk to you is frankly absurd.
Along with having multiple witnesses writing about him and all stories aligning in continuity. All we can take away from Mohammed is he was a perverted Schizo that sold a hoax to Billions of People.
there are not just abrahmic religions , we also have eastern dharmic religions , maybe you wanna have a look ? Like Hinduism,Buddhism,Jainism,Sikhism,shintoism etc , stop this desert abrahmic crap, Jesus was no god and a mere human, apart from it ,it is quite evident he meditated his years in India @@oevandrorealconfia4762
It still to this day, stuns me that an iliterate man in the 6th century a.d produces a little book, smaller than the N.T., with rough copy and paste texts from the Holy Bible, that he then does some editing on these copied texts, mixes them up a bit and voila he's got his revelation from allah! Seriously! Its utterly inconceivable to me. What am i missing?
the masterful administration after muhammad died is the reason islam is still around, the rashidun under uthmand and umar codified and established the practices of islam, the only reason it remained so long is that it subsumed persia and claimed all the works of persian minds as muslim, hence the islamic golden age that ended in 1200
admittedly, I gave up years ago. I have now read it - the more I read, the more horrific it appears to be. I have started to delve in to the Sunnah, and honestly it is so disturbing. I just pray to the Lord that all the muslims who have been deceived by the false prophet find the real lord Jesus and his love, and realise that God wants us as his CHILDREN and not purely a slave as Muhammad says. I totally agree everyone should read the Qur'an - it is the most bizarre book ive ever seen.... and shows Islam for what it is - absolutely inspired by Satan! x
The first time I read the Quran with translation, i immediately questioned all my beliefs about islam. The islam i was taught since childhood was totally different than the islam in the quran. Anyone who doesn't question islam while having read it with translation is a lost cause. ( Not definitely.)
Its very normal and logic, there are so many illogical and obscure suras that if you dont question the whole madness you may be viewed as unconsciousness.
@@redouan-nx5lefirst of all it is a crappy language second of all even if it wasn't a crappy language the Quran doesn't make sense had you actually read it you would know.
@@redouan-nx5leno translations are not interpretations in the Bible does make sense to anyone who has actually read it with an open mind. And of course I can tell that you have not read the Quran or the Holy Bible.
I read the Quran twice, two different translations, first I read it as it was written, the second time I read it chronologically. I really wanted to do my best to understand it and not judge it blindly. I read it with the best intentions. Yet every time I had a conversation with a Muslim that I had read it twice and I asked for clarification of some of the things I read I was told that you have to be Arabic to understand it. I couldn’t understand why it was even translated into English in the first place. I decided that if it could only be understood by Arabic people then it is a religion best left to Arabic speaking people. As anyone who becomes a Muslim who is not Arabic simply has no idea what they are actually following.
Remain an ignorant Christian who believes God can be killed by his creation…and be born from a woman. Good luck with miserable life here and beautiful hell in the hereafter
It was revealed in Arabic because the Illusory Truth Effect is easily implemented. 🤔 It is easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. Just know that the truth has little defense against a fool determined to believe a lie. 😁
I started reading the Quran and got a headache after a few minutes. It looked like it was written by elementary school children with no understanding of language structure or composure.
Such a correct explenation, i read once, full in my own language and it was struggling, i wonder how do they can get mind from there who are not speaker of arabic, jumping from one subject to other in next verse, obviously he Heard from someone to someone information and couldn't share
I did the same.. And i closed the book and left it.. 6 years later i tried it again.. This time i found a better translation.. And then i re-verted to Islam.. So maybe you just need to try a better translation.
I can already imagine the anxiety when translating something that's supposed to be sacred, holy, cannot be changed, yet also incomprehensible at the same time
I wonder though. I doubt Christian translators feel the same dread over it, when they can leave a footnote and explain that they don't know what it means... I think the trouble with the quran is that they have to perpetuate the lie that it has been preserved perfectly.
My friend, a Kurdish man from Mahaba, Iran (who sees the absurdity of all the Imams sitting around arguing all day long about how to interpret the Koran and of course never knowing/agreeing), said the Imams took all his father's savings slowly in time teaching him how to say certain prayers in Arabic as this is the only language that "Allah" speaks. If you don't know how to say these certain prayers in Arabic then he was told he wouldn't be able to get into heaven. Therefore, he slowly paid them until when all his money was gone at which time the Imams left never tp return again. And, I was also told by a radical muslim in Turkey (lived there for 2 years) the Koran cannot be translated due to, again, the fact that 'Allah's" only language in classical Arabic. Again, what a trap.
No no no man you not paaaay enough jiziyah, they proteeeeect you or in this case negleeeeect you smh they're doing the dawah dash out here we've all seen the commercial don't miss out on this special opportunity to get scammed by the Quran and Islam for a unlimited time only special price for you 🎉
If you watch Apostate Prophet's video "Reading The Quran Turns Muslims Away", you will see that the imams are afraid of the Quran and the hadiths being translated into local languages, since the believers will be able to read the holy texts on their own and start to question the teachings of the imams. This will give rise to a sizable number of them leaving the religion and the imams losing their power over them. This also happened in Europe in the past. vis a vis Christianity
@@Redeemedbygrace-t5l You said that Allah isn’t that impressive because he knows just one language. 😂 Very true since Al-low is MoeHamHead’s sock puppet. Think of Moe as a spiritual ventriloquist. 💀
This is the strongest rebuttal of Islam I have ever heard. Muslim scholars and missionaries have been lying about the Quran to the world just to push their Islamic empire as far as they can.
I almost became Muslim because of people who lied about the Quran and sugar coated it to make it look more preety, but Jesus saved me from joining that cult
Ex Muslim from Turkey. Most Muslims have not even heard the names of these surahs. There is no one who reads hundreds of verses and tries to understand them. Only recite a few surahs during praying and they do not know even what it means in Turkish. They listen as if they were listening to Arabic folk songs without understanding it.
It happened to me. With my friend who just converted to Islam. When I asked him many questions written in Qur'an. Then when he had enough of my questions he said. "Because you don't know Arabic!" And "you use wrong translation!".
It's the same thing they say every time when losing an argument on the internet. Don't forget, the Quran says about itself that the very Quran is 100% perfect and 100% clear, and then you have stuff like this. What a prideful deception.
It's weird because I read a comment on the godlogic video saying the sheikh something who debated didn't understand Arabic so he couldn't possibly understand Islam and someone got angry and replied that someone didn't need to understand Arabic to learn Islam. So which is the truth? Should or shouldn't people understand Arabic to learn Islam? 😂 What inconsistent group of people they are
Christianity and Islam are same icecream different flavors. My book is perfect; no my book is perfect. You go to hell if you don’t believe in my god; no infact you go to hell if you don’t believe in my god as well the blood sacrifice. Both demoting the concept of God to petty childish person who is very pro their club and very anti other club to the point that anyone not rooting for their club will be made to suffer for eternity. Absurd and funny people but fun to watch.
You, David, are a godsend. I was having this conversation with my ex who is a muslim and he kept saying how beautiful Arabic is and that the Quran is written so well and I nearly gave into his advice to spend years studying Arabic, and probably then I still would be deemed not proficient enough to enjoy the true meaning of the Quran. You have probably saved countless others from wasted years as well. I only wish I had these videos 14 years ago...
If what they say is true then why is it that when Muhammad is preaching his Quran nobody is amazed by the eloquence of Allah but everyone think he’s a madman, who makes stuff up and is copying from old fables😂
I feel your pain of all the years you spent trying to make sense out of the CLEAR QURAN. Be happy that for some time now and forever, you have removed yourself from the cognitive dissonance and Quranic psycho-babel.
@@josephbrandenburg4373 That's true, if done for the right reasons. I moved to France and learned the language. Unfortunately, the only guys who ever talk to me here are the Muhammadan variety.
This is true. In malaysia, muslim dont bother what is actually written in the alquran. They will just follow what the dakwah people quote. Any quote that doesnt align with what threy say, they pretend ignore, or start attacking you. Its the most craziest thing ever.
I also tried to read the Quran...and being Ukrainian myself, I'd rather read War and Peace 10 times in a row, without stopping, since it has a way more interesting and phenomenal story than the dry and contradictory words of Allah that make me scratch my head like a dog with 10,000 ticks!
And I guess War and Peace is better in Ukranian or Russian than it is in other languages (sinceit was written in Russian). I've been learning Polish, maybe I should give Ukranian a try? 🙂
Hello David. Arabic is my first language. I can confirm that Arabic is not rich at all. Its the most confusing language ever. While English has adopted French, German, Spanish and other languages to give more shades and grades to any meaning, Arabic stays unflexible.
That heavily depends on the dialect you’re referring to. Moroccan Arabic (Darija) surprisingly has many vocabularies from French and Spanish. Talking about Classical Arabic your comment might be accurate.
@@redouan-nx5lethat doesn't change the fact that classical arabic is garbage. The Quran is nonsense and when you bring this up they always say, "but you should read it in arabic" yet the Quran says it's clear and also that some verses no ody understand but "allah". It's clearly man-made and a cult
muslims : imagine a prophet called George. He demands you follow his pedoness and kill. he fullfills no prophecies, makes none, says he has no idea what will happen to him or others after death. would you follow him commiting sins like murder, theft, lying and rape? no if his name is george, but yes if mohammad.
They needed a distinct religion of their very own to die for. It didn’t have to be true or complete, just compelling enough to inspire warriors to go boldly into battle without fear of death.
Over 1400, thousands of Islamic scholars are writing interpretations, commentaries, translations to explain a single book, but still its vague and debatable. If Author failed to convey his message to his readers, it means he was stupid, fraud, ignorant and ill-informed.
maybe because it's a divine book that keeps on giving. a book of 500 pages has been studied for 1400 years and people are still finding new things. you don't understand it because you don't deserve to. you will only understand it when you beat your ego and realise that you are nothing and submit to allah only then does allah reach back and allow you to feel his presence
@@btc-news If you're a casual reader or a book critique who's just into ancient/old literature why would you submit to "Allah" just to read it? LMAO 😂
Reading the Necronomicon inflicts less sanity damage than _trying_ to read the Quran. The associated gods (e.g. Cthulhu, Yog-Sothoth, Nyarlathotep, etc.) are less evil, too.
Were you dreaming.. 😅😂 Tell your audience why you are all the time deleting the replies of an academic @ranro7371.. You're just pushing a false impression on the Q.. I doubt if you are a 'doctor'... 😆🤣😋
@@ranro7371looking up the Aramaic word for God in the book of Daniel, I found it is Elohai not alaha as you claim. You should know that allah is a female word, best translated as goddess and not god.
I'm reading the Quran in Hebrew, which is also a Semitic language, and it's a tiresome task. Every 3rd sentence is either a promise of rewards in the hereafter or a threat of hellfires. Sometimes it changes subject in almost in the middle of the verse. I once heard a Muslim scholar say that in Islam, God has to have a no small degree of arbitrariness.
Same here. Know a bit of Arabic in both colonial influenced Arabic and Classical Arabic. Have no problem to search for Arabic dictionary while reading the Quran, the topics changed drastically like from “mountains are peg-leg like to prevent earthquakes” to “birds was made by Lah to divebomb demons” to “flying donkeys”. And I understand why many ex-muslims saying about the fear tactic in Quran for as you said every 3-5 sentences, there are promises to heaven and hell.
In every other verse it ends with a combination of these, "Allah is all wise, all knowing, all merciful". 😂😂 . It seem like Allah is a very prideful, narcissistic god 😂, sounds like Satan to me 🤔
@@JKRuc That actually follows the logic of Near Eastern pagan prayers, which were less talking to their gods than _magical incantations designed to manipulate the target God or demon into doing what the petitioner wanted._ In practice, this usually meant alleviating a perceived curse, because gods and demons were thought to be prone to violent mood swings and arbitrarily getting offended over potentially anything a mortal did. Whether it was trying to increase one's fortunes or appeasement to alleviate a curse, one of the key components was *flattery,* usually by invoking particular names or titles to a god/demon relevant to the desired outcome. The flattery didn't even necessarily have to mean anything either, as it was fundamentally sympathetic magic designed to butter up/prime the entity in question. Knowing the kinds of Baalite traditions that actually gave rise to Islam's Allah, all the claims of Allah's "mercy" at the ends of Islamic prayers sound not only disingenuous, *but take on the tone of **_tacit begging of a tyrant to spare them._* Which, sadly, fits Allah's M.O. to a T. Edit: Also worth noting, this is why Yahweh instructed the Israelites _not to worship him with empty flattery and cajoling like the pagans did their gods._ Likewise, this is what is alluded to when Yahweh said you will not take His name in vain, as well as forbidding most forms of magic; both entail trying to *_manipulate God by magical means,_* and He most definitely won't tolerate that like some petty false god might.
From the moment I entered this world, I was assigned the label of being a Muslim by those in power, leaving me with no say in the matter. However, as I reached the age of 15, I began to question the belief that had been imposed upon me. This state of confusion propelled me on a quest for truth. I delved into the depths of the Quran, reading it carefully, seven times, both in its original language and translated versions. It was through this journey that I ultimately decided to part ways with the religion. Since then, I have discovered a newfound happiness within myself. I have realised that I do not require a specific religious affiliation, for I believe that the essence of God resides within the depths of my heart. Indeed, the Quran serves as a genuine source of guidance. It has led me to abandon this absurd religion and this is the only miracle I've found and witnessed.
I’ve been having a discussion with a Muslim at my work. It went exactly how David said it would. “The Quran is Gods word solely bc of how amazing the writing is”. He is not interested in evidence or logical reasoning..... amazing.
Show him this: Hamas, Al Queda, ISIS, Hazbulla, and so on have all 1 thing in common; Islam. I don't want to sound crazy but have you guys ever red the quran? There are passages in there where Mohammed calls for the killing of all Jews and that "the last hour" would not come until Muslims slaughter the Jews (Sahih Muslim 2922). And there's passages in there saying Muslims should not take Christians and Jews as friends because they are friends of eachother and Mohammed called Christians and Jews "unjust people" (Surah Al-Ma'idah - 51). I am afraid these groups will not disappear until Islam disappears and people realize it's not a religion of peace but of war and terror, not all Muslims are bad people; some are Muslim by customs of the country they live in and family they have but never really read the quran and just try to live a good life. The reason why Mohammed has this hatred against the Jews and Christians is because when Mohammed went to the Jews to prove to his followers he was a prophet (he said the Jews would confirm he was a prophet), the Jews send him packing and told him in his face he was wrong and not a prophet (and the Jews were right); that is where his hatred for Jews started. And likewise the Christians rejected Mohammed as a prophet, which caused his hatred for Christians. Islamists treat Mohammed like more than a prophet, they treat him like Messiah; Mohammed is a false prophet and false messiah leading many astray into hatred for one another even to the point of death. All Israel is doing right now is self-defense, the land called Israel was never called Palestine and there was no Palestinian identity until the Muslims and Arabs made it up in the mid-late 1900's; it's a Islamic lie, because in Islam they are allowed to lie in war times; there has been war on and off since Israel's reestablishment and the aggressors are Islamic countries and Islamic terrorist groups funded by Islamic countries. The land Israel; to who'm does it belong in the first place? The Arabians Muslims, falsely identifying as Palestinians, argue it belongs to them but let's take a look at history and facts: Before 1200 BC the land belonged to the Sea Peoples In and after 1200 BC it belonged to Israelites In 957 BC the Israelites build the first Temple In 722 BC the Assyrians invade Israel and take over In 586 BC the Babylonians invade the land and take over and causes the displacement of Israel In 515 BC Israelites return to Israel and the second Temple is build In 332 BC Alexander the great invades Israel and takes over In 63 BC the Romans came and took over Israel but Israel was still considered a vassal State at that time - 0 BC passing by the birth, life, death, resurrection and ascension of Jesus Christ of Nazareth we go into AD - In 70 AD the temple is destroyed In 136 AD the Romans (ruled by Emperor Hadrian) named the area of modern Israel "Paleshtina" as an insult to the Jews after the Bar Kokhba revolt (because the Philistines were the enemy of ancient Israel). In 343 AD the Christians take over the Roman empire, this was not a violent take over; it was by conversion In 395 AD the Romans split In 636 AD the Muslims invade, forcibly converting the Christians and Jews to Islam or killing them or enslaving them or running them off by force In 1099 AD the Christians recapture Jerusalem and the surrounding areas, establishing the Crusader States In 1291 AD the Mamluk Muslims invaded and took over the area, forcefully converting the Christians and Jews back to Islam In 1517 AD the Ottoman empire invaded and conquered the region In 1918 AD after World War I the Christians took back over the region, this was taken by England In 1948 AD England "gives" the land back to the Jews and Israel is reestablished. In 1948 AD it was not "given back" to the Jews exactly; there was a war following the 1947 UN partition plan, later, in 1948, following the declaration of the establishment of the State of Israel on May 14, 1948, Arabs launched a military intervention in what became the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, resulting in Israel gaining control of more land than allocated in the UN plan. In present time, Israel owns the land and gave the Arabs who identify as "Palestinians" a piece of land called Gaza, in return Hamas (ruler of Gaza) sends Islamic terrorists to kill innocent civilians in Israel on October the 7th (just to name one example of the many examples) and declares Jihad; they want to take over Israel by force through murder, terrorism and destruction. So who has the right to the land? Israel. But let's give more facts and details: - If we look into the Bible and the Torah it is clear it belongs to Israel (the Jews). - Jews owned the land for 1411 years, the Muslims for 1090 years and the Christians for 515 years; so by years it belongs to the Jews. - If the land belongs to the Natives of the land; the Natives of the land are Jews so it belongs to the Jews - The "Philistines" are the ancient enemy of the Jewish people (which are not the Arabs that call themselves "Palestinians" today, and those people (the Philistines) are long gone from the world today) - The Roman empire called the land "Paleshtina" as an insult as mentioned above and not "Palestine" actually, "Palestine" is just a misinterpreted of the word "Paleshtina" - The matter of the fact is that "Palestine" and the "Palestinian people" are not more than a fiction, a fake, a propaganda made by the Arabs and Muslim world - Israelis have no other country to go to, and this is the decisive truth that helped Israel win all its wars. Israelis have nowhere to go, therefore every war and every conflict is an existential threat to Israel. Muslims have about 50 countries, to live, go to, etc. Facts, history and common sense says Israel belongs to the Jews and Islam is a threat to every human life; the Jew, the Christian and even the unbeliever.
Same, most of muslims i knew are well-behaved until i asked them something i read from the Quran. They change attitude. Later i found out that the thing they’ve been doing called “Taqiya” which is pretending they’re (muslims) friendly, hospitable towards non-muslims but disgust non-muslims. They’re basically taught to be liar.
I find it so interesting that the God of the universe would choose a man who can’t read or write, and speaks classical Arabic as the language to write the book from heaven in. A language with no vowels where you can’t tell س apart from ش and ع from غand ص fromض and خ from ح and ج and ظ from ط because those consonantal markers didn't exist yet. Doesn’t that seem odd to you?
No about knowing how to read or write. It's about Allah that Muslims claim to be a Creator of all things but Allah didn't know Muhammed was unable to read. So Allah doesn't know his creation.
David, do you know what they tell us, the native Arabic speakers, in similar situations?: "You don’t understand Quran the way Ulama (scholars) do" "You need to have spent all of your life studying Islam to fully understand Quran" "If what you are saying applied, then would Islam have survived 1500 years and been followed by billions of people?" I swear I am not making this stuff up 😂
Yes,, yes they would follow blindly because of your barbaric ways of torture and death for the slightest infraction. Who would dare say anything different? Are you too thick in the skull to understand that?
Writing a religion is wild, that makes it prone to mistranslation, misinterpretation, ambiguity, and corruption, as both the Quran and Bible suffer from.
I am an Arabic speaker (my mother tongue) and can assert every thing mentioned in this video. Quran is a mess, the interpretation of almost every single verse starts with (and the interpreters disagree on what Allah meant by that). If you read the whole different interpretations, you would come to the conclusion that these verses don't mean anything. Even if the verse is understandable, you get nothing out of it. The most incoherent meaningless Arabic book ever written.
@@ranro7371 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 There are already three languages waaaayyy older than Arabic off just the top of my history lessons. So… your very 1st premise is crumbling like a flimsy house of cards!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Your compassion for Muslims is incredible. For decades you - a highly intelligent person who could have devoted his life to much more beautiful and interesting topics - have now been studying the Koran in order to protect them from one of Satan's greatest lies. I hope our Muslim brothers and sisters will eventually recognize and appreciate it, and above all, finally turn their backs on this unbearable nonsense. Thank you for your tireless efforts. God bless you and your loved ones.
Most Muslims will never see or acknowledge the truth. They will be the right hand of the Beast, and enjoy every minute of it. Well, until they are turned into walking dead men, torn apart by birds.
What utter drivel. Arabic is the oldest continually spoken language in world. Back when English didn’t even have a script resembled German more than any entire encyclopedia were written in Arabic.
@@ranro7371 _Here is a factual statement. The Arabic language is the original from which developed off the Aramaic and "Semetic" langauges._ Except the Old Testament of the Bible is written in Hebrew, not Aramaic which makes your comment irrelevant since the Bible is in Hebrew, not Aramaic, two different languages. And Arabic is not the original language, that's historically false.
Just finished Seeking Allah finding Jesus and I am more christian than ever. Thanks god for sending you to Nabeel so that he could create one of the greatest books i’ve ever read!
I had seen Nabeel's book at a Christian Life Book Store (in north Texas), and bought it; enjoyed it immensely too. Praise be to our Father for leading Nabeel to His Son Jesus!!!
It’s pretty interesting how he died from stomach cancer after his conversion when the punishment in Islam for backbiting is painful death and permanent hell
@@Expiredbeefsteak is that why your false prophet died a slow and painful death from the hands of a Jewish lady, allah couldn't protect your false prophet from poison. what a powerless god.
Thank you, David. You have answered my 50 year old question why the Quran is written in Arabic. When I was kid, I saw my Malay neighbours reciting the Quran and I think they don't understand the scriptures but regurgitate the recitation.
It's the melody and rhythm. We see this as an effective memorization tool, passed down verbally and not require literacy. Clever exploit that seems to bypass critical thinking.
So if I follow this logic: as a German I could become a Muslim, then I can live as I want, as Allah didn’t send a messenger in German to reveal his truth. So I have an excuse on judgement day …🤪 I’m glad that Jesus is the messiah for the Jews and gentiles! Thank you Jesus.
you guys were under the Roman empire when Jesus was around. The Anglo, the Portoguese, Germanic, Jews etc. So by this logic you all should naturally follow Christianity or Judaism based on which community you were closer to. If Asterix and Obelix serves as a work of literature, it shows the relationship between the Romans and the Gauls etc. etc.
@@Hedgehogz856 In ancient times, the region now known as Germany was partially under Roman control. It wasn’t fully occupied by the Romans and was not a unified country, rather a collection of various smaller kingdoms, but the land was still under Roman control.
@@Marco_My_Wordsit was not the border was the Rhine river wich may be modern Germany but the Germanic tribes that were originally there were killed or retreated across the Rhine the Germanic people never were subjugated they fought to hard the celts in modern day england were defeated though
Surah Al-Nisaa Aya - 46 Addresses people like those in the video who take verses from the Quran out of their context. The examples cited are misrepresented, of the verses he cites: Surah Al-Sajdah, Surah 32 which he begins with it starts with addressing all of mankind Surah Al-Nahl, Surah 16 in the verse he is citing it is again addressing all of mankind, saying that Islam is the truth, addressing those who worship tyrant/leaders, Surah Ya-Sin, the 34th surah Aya 1-16 is deliberatley misinterpeted to have been referring to Arabs, when infact it is addressing all of those who know about or heard the Quran, the same is true for literally every verse he cites, go to his citation and read the preceding verses to see for yourself, every single point raised here is addressed in the Qur'an itself. In addition from Surahs he does not cite: Surah Al-Ma'idah Aya - 48 shows that the Quran supersedes all other revelations Surah Aal-Imraan Aya 96 - Addresses all of mankind Surah Al-Baqarah Aya 1-7, The first Surah after the opening has all the point addressed and example of people like him rebuked Surah Al-Hujurat Aya 13 - Addresses the creation of humanity into different peoples Surah Al-A'raaf Aya 171 to 178, - Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge Surah Al-Jumu'a Aya 1 to 8 Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge Surah Al-Anbiya 107 - The role of the prophet The Aramaic word for God is "Alaha". It's the word Isa PBUH used. Sounds familiar? Written without the confusing vowels it is written A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), reduced from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum) it is written in the Arabic script 'A-L-L-H' (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha) add an A before the last H for vocalization. The word God in another rendition in Hebrew ʾĕlōah is derived from a base ʾilāh, an Arabic word, written without confusing vowel it is A-L-H in the Arabic script, pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elaha. Infact both are written written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic and not A because it is an Alef with hamza below (إ أ ) They are two different forms of Alef. And it mean "a god", it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا) Jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J. The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes as will be explained. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one. Schlözer in his preparation for the Arabia expedition in 1781 coined the term Semitic language: "From the Mediterranean to the Euphrates, from Mesopotamia to Arabia ruled one language, as is well known. Thus Syrians, Babylonians, Hebrews, and Arabs were one people (ein Volk). Phoenicians (Hamites) also spoke this language, which I would like to call the Semitic (die Semitische)." -Before Boas: The Genesis of Ethnography and Ethnology in the German By Han F. Vermeulen. He was only half right though, Arabic is the only corollary to "proto-semitic", infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical as will be shown. "Semitic" is just mumbled Arabic, really. Imagine English with a third of its letters removed and simplified grammar. That's Aramaic, Hebrew, etc. For example, combine T and D into just T; there's no need to have 2 letters. The same goes for i, e, y - they should all be just y from now on, etc., etc. Arabic is the only corollary to proto-Semitic. In fact, the whole classification of Semitic languages is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning brain. Hebrew, Aramaic, and the rest of these made-up dialect continua only have 22 letters out of the 29 proto-Semitic letters. Arabic has all 29. The difference between Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as the difference between Latin and pig Latin or Italian. "Phoenician" is an Arabic dialect continuum, and not only that, it is pidgin. It is simplified to the point of stupidity. Anyone with a basic knowledge of Arabic would see this clearly. What happened was that Arabic handicapped "scholars" saw the equivalent of Scottish Twitter spelling, with added mumbling due to phonemic mergers (22 letters, not 29), and mistakenly thought they were seeing a different language." "protosemetic" Alphabet (29), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22) 𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼 ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic: ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining protoS 29th is a س written in a different position, but was shoehorned to obfuscate. This kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua. As a matter of fact, all of the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and their complexity was derived from the Qur'an. It was by analyzing the syntactic structure of the Qur'an that the Arabic root system was developed. This system was first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, which preceded the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years. It was through this development that the concept of Arabic roots was established and later co-opted into the term 'semitic root,' allowing the decipherment of ancient scripts. In essence, they quite literally copied and pasted the entirety of the Arabic root. Hebrew had been dead, as well as all the other dialects of Arabic, until being 'revived' in a Frankensteinian fashion in the 18th and 19th centuries. The entire region spoke basically the same language, with mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language gradually became more degenerate, and then the Qur'an appeared with the oldest possible form of the language thousands of years later. This is why the Arabs of that time were challenged to produce 10 similar verses, and they couldn't. People think it's a miracle because they couldn't do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself. They had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision. And when I say mathematical, I quite literally mean mathematical. Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken? The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study.real God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
I'm happy there are translators around the world, across all countries, working hard to make Bible accessible to every culture and languages. Because the same cannot be said for Quran.
@@LeniPeni That works too. But when we read the q🕳️u🕳️r🕳️a🕳️n and point out the nonsense in it, they demand we learn arabic. It’s more than the reading that I was calling out.
@@EricDG326 I meant that it’s incredibly hard to understand even if you’re an expert in the language like David said. So it can’t be read and that’s why it can’t even be translated
The examples cited are misrepresented, indeed that very misrepresentation is answered in the same Surahs of the verses he cites: Surah Al-Sajdah, Surah 32, which he begins with it starts with addressing all of mankind. Surah Al-Nahl, Surah 16, in the verse he is citing it is again addressing all of mankind, saying that Islam is the truth, addressing those who worship tyrant/leaders. Surah Yasin, Surah 34, Aya 1-16 is deliberatley misinterpeted to have been referring to Arabs, when infact it is addressing all of those who know about or heard the Qura. The same is true for literally every verse he cites, go to his citation and read the preceding verses to see for yourself, every single point raised here is addressed in the Qur'an itself. In addition from Surahs he does not cite: Surah Al-Baqarah Aya 1-7 The first Surah after the opening has all the point addressed and example of people like him rebuked Surah Al-A'raaf Aya 171 to 178 - Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge Surah Al-Nisaa Aya 46 - Addresses people like those in the video who take verses from the Quran out of their context Surah Al-Ma'idah Aya 48 - shows that the Quran supersedes all other revelations Surah Aal-Imraan Aya 96 - Addresses all of mankind Surah Al-Anbiya Aya 107 - The role of the prophet Surah Al-Hujurat Aya 13 - Addresses the creation of humanity into different peoples Surah Al-Jumu'a Aya 1 to 8 Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge The Aramaic word for God is Alaha. It's the word Isa PBUH (Jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J). Sounds familiar? Written without the confusing vowels, it is A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), adducted from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum) 'A-L-L-H' (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha). The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes as aforementioned. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one. In addition,The word God in another rendition in Hebrew ʾĕlōah is derived from a base ʾilāh, an Arabic word, written without confusing vowel it is A-L-H in the Arabic script, pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elaha. Infact both are written written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic and not A because it is an Alef with hamza below (إ أ ) They are two different forms of Alef. And it mean "a god", it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا), but this kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua. infact "YHWH" itself is an Arabic word as discussed by Professor. Israel Knohl (Professor of Biblical studies at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem) in the paper" YHWH: The Original Arabic Meaning of the Name." "protosemetic" Alphabet (29), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22) 𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼 ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic: ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining The reason why the protoS alphabet here is 28 and not 29, is because the supposed extra letter is simply a س written in a different position, but it was shoehorned to obfuscated. In Arabic letter shapes are different depending on whether they are in the beginning , middle or end of a word. This kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua. As a matter of fact, all of the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and their complexity was derived from the Qur'an. It was by analyzing the syntactic structure of the Qur'an that the Arabic root system was developed. This system was first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, which preceded the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years. It was through this development that the concept of Arabic roots was established and later co-opted into the term 'semitic root,' allowing the decipherment of ancient scripts. In essence, they quite literally copied and pasted the entirety of the Arabic root. Hebrew had been dead, as well as all the other dialects of Arabic, until being 'revived' in a Frankensteinian fashion in the 18th and 19th centuries. The entire region spoke basically the same language, with mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language gradually became more degenerate, and then the Qur'an appeared with the oldest possible form of the language thousands of years later. This is why the Arabs of that time were challenged to produce 10 similar verses, and they couldn't. People think it's a miracle because they couldn't do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself. They had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision. And when I say mathematical, I quite literally mean mathematical. Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken? The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study.real God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
Dear brother Dr. David, my mother language is ARABIC, and I am near 70 years of Age I have studied Arabic and I master it more than 99% of the Arabic speaking people, and I am also multi-lingual (Three perfect languages and two more so so) So my testimony must be valid, Arabic is one of the most pathetic languages in the universe, Why? Because 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, Should I go further? OK here we go. Arabic started to develop about 17 centuries ago. For it to be useful, it had to depend on so many languages around the area it started, such as Assyrian, Aramaic, Pehlevi Abyssinian, Greek, Latin, Armenian and so and so forth, (Some experts stated that it comprises of 66 identified languages, Dr. Christof Lexenberg). On the other hand, the Quran is untranslatable, why? because to translate any piece, one MUST understand it first, then you can translate. The most common comment of the interpreters and commentators of the Islamic scholars is That they are in dispute with each other, and they are NEVER in agreement almost of any phrase, sentence or idea. Back to the subject, Arabic, it has been anchored in the ground by its neck only due to the Quran which froze it and kept it undevelopable. I invite you and all, (only if you speak Arabic - unfortunately) to see how polemics and apologetics who speak Arabic silence the Dawah people concerning the Quran and the language. Off topic, Dr. Taha Houssain the Egyptian blind Dean of the Arabic literature in Egypt until he was fired from the educational ministry of Egypt around 1955, He wrote a book explaining that the Arabic poetry was composed on during the 9th and on centuries AD for the purpose of supporting the newly composed Quran (then) (The book’s name is Alsheir Aljahely - i.e., the pre Islamic era Poetry) He also stated that if he wishes, he can compose a much better Quran and more understandable. Dear Dr. David, I can go on and on for hours and days explaining these issues mostly from their own books and their own scholars and even from the Quran itself. God bless you and your family
@@muhammadsair3598 of course, what else would you say? instead of addressing the subject directly you take the Islamic approach of personal attacks. Thank you and God bless you. (Between you and me, No dear Sir I have no grudges, as a former WAFA translator in the early 2000, and reading the reports directly from the field, I got so sick and got diabetes which still with me until now. WAFA is the Palestinian News Agency, I got sick due to my emotional involvements with what humanly happened Palestinians, I have dozens of stories that give me nightmares, but to be honest, one has to be honest)
Allah is such a caged god. He cannot have omnipresence, as such he's restricted to heaven, he cannot sit on his own throne, so he hovers over it in a way that can't be explained. He doesn't understand any languages besides Arabic. Muslims gather 5 times a day to command that Allah should pray for Muhammed. It's fascinating just how restricted their god is.
Surah Al-Nisaa Aya - 46 Addresses people like those in the video who take verses from the Quran out of their context. The examples cited are misrepresented, of the verses he cites: Surah Al-Sajdah, Surah 32 which he begins with it starts with addressing all of mankind Surah Al-Nahl, Surah 16 in the verse he is citing it is again addressing all of mankind, saying that Islam is the truth, addressing those who worship tyrant/leaders, Surah Ya-Sin, the 34th surah Aya 1-16 is deliberatley misinterpeted to have been referring to Arabs, when infact it is addressing all of those who know about or heard the Quran, the same is true for literally every verse he cites, go to his citation and read the preceding verses to see for yourself, every single point raised here is addressed in the Qur'an itself. In addition from Surahs he does not cite: Surah Al-Ma'idah Aya - 48 shows that the Quran supersedes all other revelations Surah Aal-Imraan Aya 96 - Addresses all of mankind Surah Al-Baqarah Aya 1-7, The first Surah after the opening has all the point addressed and example of people like him rebuked Surah Al-Hujurat Aya 13 - Addresses the creation of humanity into different peoples Surah Al-A'raaf Aya 171 to 178, - Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge Surah Al-Jumu'a Aya 1 to 8 Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge Surah Al-Anbiya 107 - The role of the prophet The Aramaic word for God is "Alaha". It's the word Isa PBUH used. Sounds familiar? Written without the confusing vowels it is written A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), reduced from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum) it is written in the Arabic script 'A-L-L-H' (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha) add an A before the last H for vocalization. The word God in another rendition in Hebrew ʾĕlōah is derived from a base ʾilāh, an Arabic word, written without confusing vowel it is A-L-H in the Arabic script, pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elaha. Infact both are written written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic and not A because it is an Alef with hamza below (إ أ ) They are two different forms of Alef. And it mean "a god", it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا) Jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J. The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes as will be explained. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one. Schlözer in his preparation for the Arabia expedition in 1781 coined the term Semitic language: "From the Mediterranean to the Euphrates, from Mesopotamia to Arabia ruled one language, as is well known. Thus Syrians, Babylonians, Hebrews, and Arabs were one people (ein Volk). Phoenicians (Hamites) also spoke this language, which I would like to call the Semitic (die Semitische)." -Before Boas: The Genesis of Ethnography and Ethnology in the German By Han F. Vermeulen. He was only half right though, Arabic is the only corollary to "proto-semitic", infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical as will be shown. "Semitic" is just mumbled Arabic, really. Imagine English with a third of its letters removed and simplified grammar. That's Aramaic, Hebrew, etc. For example, combine T and D into just T; there's no need to have 2 letters. The same goes for i, e, y - they should all be just y from now on, etc., etc. Arabic is the only corollary to proto-Semitic. In fact, the whole classification of Semitic languages is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning brain. Hebrew, Aramaic, and the rest of these made-up dialect continua only have 22 letters out of the 29 proto-Semitic letters. Arabic has all 29. The difference between Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as the difference between Latin and pig Latin or Italian. "Phoenician" is an Arabic dialect continuum, and not only that, it is pidgin. It is simplified to the point of stupidity. Anyone with a basic knowledge of Arabic would see this clearly. What happened was that Arabic handicapped "scholars" saw the equivalent of Scottish Twitter spelling, with added mumbling due to phonemic mergers (22 letters, not 29), and mistakenly thought they were seeing a different language." "protosemetic" Alphabet (29), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22) 𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼 ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic: ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining protoS 29th is a س written in a different position, but was shoehorned to obfuscate. This kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua. As a matter of fact, all of the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and their complexity was derived from the Qur'an. It was by analyzing the syntactic structure of the Qur'an that the Arabic root system was developed. This system was first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, which preceded the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years. It was through this development that the concept of Arabic roots was established and later co-opted into the term 'semitic root,' allowing the decipherment of ancient scripts. In essence, they quite literally copied and pasted the entirety of the Arabic root. Hebrew had been dead, as well as all the other dialects of Arabic, until being 'revived' in a Frankensteinian fashion in the 18th and 19th centuries. The entire region spoke basically the same language, with mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language gradually became more degenerate, and then the Qur'an appeared with the oldest possible form of the language thousands of years later. This is why the Arabs of that time were challenged to produce 10 similar verses, and they couldn't. People think it's a miracle because they couldn't do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself. They had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision. And when I say mathematical, I quite literally mean mathematical. Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken? The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study.real God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
@@Mohammadali-dv6kb Aulloh is a god, we have no doubt about that. But is he THE one true God? There's no evidence for that claim. What's your evidence that aulloh is the one true God? He calls himself God and borrows names from judeo-christian theology doesn't automatically make him God. The Jews have the miracles of Moses against the gods of Egypt. The Christians have the resurrection of Jesus which conquered death forever. Show us your evidence that aulloh is the true God.
When r@@Mohammadali-dv6kbwhen everything in the quoran is forever misinterpreted or quoted out of context, then the religion is not meant for mankind, not even for the so called Dawah who never agree on it's meanings. To me it is meant to pretend to teach a doctrine with political end.
5:55... LOLOL! I am one of the idiots who actually did spend 4-5 years studying Arabic so that I could read the "final revelation" in the original language on my own. When I finally got to it (still mostly needed a side-by-side English-Arabic copy to understand fully), I literally wanted to barf while barely into it. But I kept going, getting more and more nauseated as I went. I wanted to finish the book in its entirety, just to be sure I had given it every chance imaginable and that I hadn't missed out on the single tiniest "gem". Glad I did it. I can now say with supreme confidence that it is absolutely, indubitably the WORST book I have ever read. Yeah, sure, the recitation is cool. Just like Gregorian or medieval chants or even Latin mass, or classical guitar or piano. But the book itself requires keeping a barf bag handy. And I remained a Christian.
@@ranro7371 That's all very interesting information. I have extensively studied several languages from four different linguistic families, so I find all this fascinating. But, what does that have to do with the message contained in the Quran?
@@ranro7371 You just wasted A LOT OF TIME copying/pasting useless information. No one cares about a book wriiten in a language spoken by less than 2% of the world. The fact remains, the quran is a literary garbabe pile, full of scientific, historic and grammatical errors; disorganized and self-contradictory. *Dr. Seuss wrote better that "allah" (a.k.a., Muhammed) did* .
The recitation stinks, too. If there's a collection of sounds that by themselves have the power to send a soul to hell, it's the Arabic language. Which I (regrettably) can speak, in a fashion, after having lived in the middle east for a time.
The examples cited are misrepresented, of the verses he cites: Surah Al-Sajdah, Surah 32 which he begins with it starts with addressing all of mankind Surah Al-Nahl, Surah 16 in the verse he is citing it is again addressing all of mankind, saying that Islam is the truth, addressing those who worship tyrant/leaders, Surah Ya-Sin, the 34th surah Aya 1-16 is deliberatley misinterpeted to have been referring to Arabs, when infact it is addressing all of those who know about or heard the Quran, the same is true for literally every verse he cites, go to his citation and read the preceding verses to see for yourself, every single point raised here is addressed in the Qur'an itself. In addition from Surahs he does not cite: Surah Al-Ma'idah Aya - 48 shows that the Quran supersedes all other revelations Surah Al-Nisaa Aya - 46 Addresses people like those in the video who take verses from the Quran out of their context Surah Aal-Imraan Aya 96 - Addresses all of mankind Surah Al-Baqarah Aya 1-7, The first Surah after the opening has all the point addressed and example of people like him rebuked Surah Al-Hujurat Aya 13 - Addresses the creation of humanity into different peoples Surah Al-A'raaf Aya 171 to 178, - Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge Surah Al-Jumu'a Aya 1 to 8 Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge Surah Al-Anbiya 107 - The role of the prophet The Aramaic word for God is Alaha. It's the word Isa PBUH (Jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J). Sounds familiar? Written without the confusing vowels, it is A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), adducted from the Arabic original of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum of A-L-L-H (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha). Language; When you look at the actual linguistics, you'll find that many were puzzled by the opposite, that is, how the other "semetic" (why in quotes will be revealed later) languages were more "evolved" than Arabic, while Arabic had archaic features, not only archaic compared to bibilical Hebrew, Ethiopic, "Aramaic" contemporary "semetic" languages, but even archaic compared to languages from ancient antiquity; Ugaritic, Akkadain. What is meant here by Archaic is not what most readers think, it is Archaic not in the sense that it is simple, but rather that it is complex (think Latin to pig Latin or Italian or Old English, which had genders and case endings to modern English), not only grammatically, but also phonetically; All the so called semitic languages are supposed to have evolved from protosemetic, the Alphabet for protosemitic is that of the so called Ancient South Arabian (which interestingly corresponds with the traditional Arabic origins account) and has 28 Phonemes. Arabic has 28 phonemes. Hebrew has 22, same as Aramaic, and other "semitic" languages. Now pause for a second and think about it, how come Arabic, a language that is supposed to have come so late has the same number of letters as a language that supposedly predates it by over a millennium (Musnad script ~1300 BCE). Not only is the glossary of phonemes more diverse than any other semitic language, but the grammar is more complex, containing more cases and retains what's linguists noted for its antiquity, broken plurals. Indeed, a linguist has once noted that if one were to take everything we know about languages and how they develop, Arabic is older than Akkadian (~2500 BCE). |Classical Arabic | 28 consonants, 29 with Hamza and 6 vowels; some consonants are emphatic or pharyngealized; some vowels are marked with diacritics | Complex system of word formation based on roots and patterns; roots are sequences of consonants that carry the basic meaning of a word; patterns are sequences of vowels and affixes that modify the meaning and function of a word | Flexible word order, but VSO is most common; SVO is also possible; subject and object are marked by case endings (-u for nominative, -a for accusative, -i for genitive); verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different moods and aspects | | Akkadian | 22 consonants and 3 vowels; some consonants are glottalized or palatalized; vowels are not marked | Similar system, but with different roots and patterns; some roots have more than three consonants; some patterns have infixes or reduplication | Fixed word order of SVO; subject and object are not marked by case endings, but by prepositions or word order; verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different tenses and aspects | | Aramaic | 22 consonants and 3 vowels (later variants have more); no emphatic or pharyngealized consonants (except in some dialects); vowels are not marked (except in later variants such as Syriac) | Simple system of word formation based on prefixes and suffixes; some roots or patterns exist, but are less productive than in Arabic or Akkadian | Matter of fact that all this, and the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and the complexity all of it was derived from the Qur'an, it was by analysing the syntactic structure of the Quran that the Arabic root system was developed, first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, preceding the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years, that the concept of Arabic root was developed and later co-opted into "semitic root" that the ancient scripts were deciphered, they quite literally copy pasted the entirey of Arabic root. hebrew had been dead, and so were all the other dialects of Arabic until being "revived" in a frankensteinian fashion in the 18th, 19th centuries. The whole region spoke basically the same language, mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language became more degenerate and then the Quran appears with the oldest form possible of the language thousands of years later It is why the Arabs back then were challenged to produce 10 verses similar, and they couldnt. People think it's a miracle becau'e they couldnt do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself, they had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision behind it. And I quite literally mean, mathematical. Arabic is the only corollary to proto-semitic, infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning mass between their ears. hebrew, aramaic, rest of madeup dialect continua only have 22 letters of the 29 protosemitic letters Arabic has all 29. The difference betweeen Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as that between Latin and pig latin or italian. "Semitic" is just mumbled Arabic, really. Imagine English with a third of its letters removed and simplified grammar. That's Aramaic, Hebrew, etc. For example, combine T and D into just T; there's no need to have 2 letters. The same goes for i, e, y - they should all be just y from now on, etc., etc. Arabic is the only corollary to proto-Semitic. In fact, the whole classification of Semitic languages is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning brain. Hebrew, Aramaic, and the rest of these made-up dialect continua only have 22 letters out of the 29 proto-Semitic letters. Arabic has all 29. The difference between Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as the difference between Latin and pig Latin or Italian. "Phoenician" is an Arabic dialect continuum, and not only that, it is pidgin. It is simplified to the point of stupidity. Anyone with a basic knowledge of Arabic would see this clearly. What happened was that Arabic handicapped "scholars" saw the equivalent of Scottish Twitter spelling, with added mumbling due to phonemic mergers (22 letters, not 29), and mistakenly thought they were seeing a different language. Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of yeara later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before and in the highest form the language had ever taken and the language is lexically, syntactically, phonemically and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing, infact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it, and not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book that in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take, so high infact it is theoretically not possible to surpass it all in a script that had never been recorded before and so the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began and age of reason and rationality was born from its study
Yeah, my dad is a (Christian) literature professor. He read a translation of the Koran and was NOT impressed with its literary value 😂. On the other hand, he's pointed out to me the literary beauty of the Bible, especially the Psalms.
The examples cited are misrepresented, indeed that very misrepresentation is answered in the same Surahs of the verses he cites: Surah Al-Sajdah, Surah 32, which he begins with it starts with addressing all of mankind. Surah Al-Nahl, Surah 16, in the verse he is citing it is again addressing all of mankind, saying that Islam is the truth, addressing those who worship tyrant/leaders. Surah Yasin, Surah 34, Aya 1-16 is deliberatley misinterpeted to have been referring to Arabs, when infact it is addressing all of those who know about or heard the Qura. The same is true for literally every verse he cites, go to his citation and read the preceding verses to see for yourself, every single point raised here is addressed in the Qur'an itself. In addition from Surahs he does not cite: Surah Al-Baqarah Aya 1-7 The first Surah after the opening has all the point addressed and example of people like him rebuked Surah Al-A'raaf Aya 171 to 178 - Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge Surah Al-Nisaa Aya 46 - Addresses people like those in the video who take verses from the Quran out of their context Surah Al-Ma'idah Aya 48 - shows that the Quran supersedes all other revelations Surah Aal-Imraan Aya 96 - Addresses all of mankind Surah Al-Anbiya Aya 107 - The role of the prophet Surah Al-Hujurat Aya 13 - Addresses the creation of humanity into different peoples Surah Al-Jumu'a Aya 1 to 8 Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge The Aramaic word for God is Alaha. It's the word Isa PBUH (Jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J). Sounds familiar? Written without the confusing vowels, it is A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), adducted from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum) 'A-L-L-H' (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha). The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes as aforementioned. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one. In addition, The word God in hebrew is eloah, is a cognate of the Arabic I-L-H, pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it into eloh, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elah. Infact it is written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic cause it is an Alef with hamza below (إ أ ) They are two different forms of Alef. And it mean "a god", it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا) "protosemetic" Alphabet (29), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22) 𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼 ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic: ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining The reason why the protoS alphabet here is 28 and not 29, is because the supposed extra letter is simply a س written in a different position, but it was shoehorned to obfuscated. In Arabic letter shapes are different depending on whether they are in the beginning , middle or end of a word. This kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua. As a matter of fact, all of the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and their complexity was derived from the Qur'an. It was by analyzing the syntactic structure of the Qur'an that the Arabic root system was developed. This system was first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, which preceded the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years. It was through this development that the concept of Arabic roots was established and later co-opted into the term 'semitic root,' allowing the decipherment of ancient scripts. In essence, they quite literally copied and pasted the entirety of the Arabic root. Hebrew had been dead, as well as all the other dialects of Arabic, until being 'revived' in a Frankensteinian fashion in the 18th and 19th centuries. The entire region spoke basically the same language, with mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language gradually became more degenerate, and then the Qur'an appeared with the oldest possible form of the language thousands of years later. This is why the Arabs of that time were challenged to produce 10 similar verses, and they couldn't. People think it's a miracle because they couldn't do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself. They had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision. And when I say mathematical, I quite literally mean mathematical. Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken? The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study.real
Part 2 Language; When you look at the actual linguistics, you'll find that many were puzzled by the opposite, that is, how the other "semetic" (why in quotes will be revealed later) languages were more "evolved" than Arabic, while Arabic had archaic features, not only archaic compared to bibilical Hebrew, Ethiopic, "Aramaic" contemporary "semetic" languages, but even archaic compared to languages from ancient antiquity; Ugaritic, Akkadain. What is meant here by Archaic is not what most readers think, it is Archaic not in the sense that it is simple, but rather that it is complex (think Latin to pig Latin or Italian or Old English, which had genders and case endings to modern English), not only grammatically, but also phonetically; All the so called semitic languages are supposed to have evolved from protosemetic, the Alphabet for protosemitic is that of the so called Ancient South Arabian (which interestingly corresponds with the traditional Arabic origins account) and has 28 Phonemes. Arabic has 28 phonemes. Hebrew has 22, same as Aramaic, and other "semitic" languages. Now pause for a second and think about it, how come Arabic, a language that is supposed to have come so late has the same number of letters as a language that supposedly predates it by over a millennium (Musnad script ~1300 BCE). Not only is the glossary of phonemes more diverse than any other semitic language, but the grammar is more complex, containing more cases and retains what's linguists noted for its antiquity, broken plurals. Indeed, a linguist has once noted that if one were to take everything we know about languages and how they develop, Arabic is older than Akkadian (~2500 BCE). |Classical Arabic | 28 consonants, 29 with Hamza and 6 vowels; some consonants are emphatic or pharyngealized; some vowels are marked with diacritics | Complex system of word formation based on roots and patterns; roots are sequences of consonants that carry the basic meaning of a word; patterns are sequences of vowels and affixes that modify the meaning and function of a word | Flexible word order, but VSO is most common; SVO is also possible; subject and object are marked by case endings (-u for nominative, -a for accusative, -i for genitive); verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different moods and aspects | | Akkadian | 22 consonants and 3 vowels; some consonants are glottalized or palatalized; vowels are not marked | Similar system, but with different roots and patterns; some roots have more than three consonants; some patterns have infixes or reduplication | Fixed word order of SVO; subject and object are not marked by case endings, but by prepositions or word order; verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different tenses and aspects | | Aramaic | 22 consonants and 3 vowels (later variants have more); no emphatic or pharyngealized consonants (except in some dialects); vowels are not marked (except in later variants such as Syriac) | Simple system of word formation based on prefixes and suffixes; some roots or patterns exist, but are less productive than in Arabic or Akkadian | Arabic is the only corollary to proto-semitic, infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning mass between their ears. hebrew, aramaic, rest of madeup dialect continua only have 22 letters of the 29 protosemitic letters Arabic has all 29. The difference betweeen Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as that between Latin and pig latin or italian. "Semitic" is just mumbled Arabic, really. Imagine English with a third of its letters removed and simplified grammar. That's Aramaic, Hebrew, etc. For example, combine T and D into just T; there's no need to have 2 letters. The same goes for i, e, y - they should all be just y from now on, etc., etc. Arabic is the only corollary to proto-Semitic. In fact, the whole classification of Semitic languages is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning brain. Hebrew, Aramaic, and the rest of these made-up dialect continua only have 22 letters out of the 29 proto-Semitic letters. Arabic has all 29. The difference between Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as the difference between Latin and pig Latin or Italian. "Phoenician" is an Arabic dialect continuum, and not only that, it is pidgin. It is simplified to the point of stupidity. Anyone with a basic knowledge of Arabic would see this clearly. What happened was that Arabic handicapped "scholars" saw the equivalent of Scottish Twitter spelling, with added mumbling due to phonemic mergers (22 letters, not 29), and mistakenly thought they were seeing a different language." God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
Let's start with a simple sentence: The house is big. How would you say it in different Semitic languages? Arabic: البيتُ كبيرٌ al-bayt-u kabīr-un Proto-Semitic: *ʔal-bayt-u kabīr-u Hebrew: הבית גדול ha-bayit gadol Akkadian: bītum rabûm Amharic: ቤቱ ገደሉ betu gedelu Arabic and Proto-Semitic have the same word order (noun-adjective), the same definite article (al-), and the same case endings (-u for nominative). Hebrew and Akkadian have lost the case endings and changed the definite article (ha- and -um respectively). Amharic has changed the word order (adjective-noun) and the definite article (u-). But Arabic is not only similar to Proto-Semitic, it is also pre-Semitic, meaning that it is the original form of Semitic before it split into different branches. This is because Arabic preserves many features that are not found in any other Semitic language, but are found in other Afro-Asiatic languages, such as Egyptian and Berber. These features include: - The definite article al-, which is derived from the demonstrative pronoun *ʔal- 'that'. This article is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the article n- in Berber and the article p-, t-, n- in Egyptian. - The dual number for nouns and verbs, which is marked by the suffix -ān or -ayn. This number is rare in other Semitic languages, but it is common in other Afro-Asiatic languages, such as Egyptian and Berber. - The imperfective prefix t- for verbs, which indicates the second person singular feminine or third person plural feminine. This prefix is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the prefix t- in Berber and Egyptian. - The passive voice for verbs, which is marked by the infix t between the first and second root consonants. This voice is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the passive voice in Egyptian and Berber. Finally, let's look at a more complex sentence: The letter was written with a pen. Arabic: كُتِبَتِ الرِّسَالَةُ بِالقَلَمِ kutiba-t al-risāla-t-u bi-l-qalam-i Proto-Semitic: *kutiba-t ʔal-risāla-t-u bi-l-qalam-i Hebrew: המכתב נכתב בעט ha-michtav niktav ba-et Akkadian: šipram šapāru bēlum Egyptian: sḏm.n.f p-ẖry m rnp.t Berber: tturra-t tibratin s uccen In the examples Arabic and Proto-Semitic have the same word order (verb-subject-object), the same passive voice marker (-t-), the same definite article (al-), and the same preposition (bi-). Hebrew has changed the word order (subject-verb-object), lost the passive voice marker, changed the definite article (ha-) and the preposition (ba-). Akkadian has changed the word order (object-subject-verb), lost the passive voice marker, changed the definite article (-um) and the preposition (bēlum). These examples show that classical Arabic has more consonants and vowels than other semitic languages, and that it preserves some sounds that were lost or changed in other semitic languages. This means that classical Arabic can encode more information in a given unit of speech than other semitic languages, and that it is closer to the original sound system of protosemitic., we can see that classical Arabic has more grammatical features than the other languages, such as case endings, mood endings, and root and pattern system. These features make classical Arabic more expressive and precise than the other languages, as it can convey more information and nuances in a single word or phrase. Classical Arabic is also more flexible than the other languages, as it can use different word orders and verb forms to emphasize different aspects of the sentence. Classical Arabic is therefore older and more original than the other languages. "Semitic" is just mumbled Arabic, really. Imagine English with a third of its letters removed and simplified grammar. That's Aramaic, Hebrew, etc. For example, combine T and D into just T; there's no need to have 2 letters. The same goes for i, e, y - they should all be just y from now on, etc., etc. Arabic is the only corollary to proto-Semitic. In fact, the whole classification of Semitic languages is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning brain. Hebrew, Aramaic, and the rest of these made-up dialect continua only have 22 letters out of the 29 proto-Semitic letters. Arabic has all 29. The difference between Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as the difference between Latin and pig Latin or Italian. "Phoenician" is an Arabic dialect continuum, and not only that, it is pidgin. It is simplified to the point of stupidity. Anyone with a basic knowledge of Arabic would see this clearly. What happened was that Arabic handicapped "scholars" saw the equivalent of Scottish Twitter spelling, with added mumbling due to phonemic mergers (22 letters, not 29), and mistakenly thought they were seeing a different language." Matter of fact that all this, and the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and the complexity all of it was derived from the Qur'an, it was by analysing the syntactic structure of the Quran that the Arabic root system was developed, first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage (of the same language) dictionary of its kind, preceding the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years, that the concept of Arabic root was developed and later co-opted into "semitic root" that the ancient scripts were deciphered, they quite literally copy pasted the entirey of Arabic root. hebrew had been dead, and so were all the other dialects of Arabic until being "revived" in a frankensteinian fashion in the 18th, 19th centuries. The whole region spoke basically the same language, mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language became more degenerate and then the Quran appears with the oldest form possible of the language thousands of years later It is why the Arabs back then were challenged to produce 10 verses similar, and they couldnt. People think it's a miracle becau'e they couldnt do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself, they had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision behind it. And I quite literally mean, mathematical. Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of yeara later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before and in the highest form the language had ever taken and the language is lexically, syntactically, phonemically and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing, infact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it, and not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book that in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take, so high infact it is theoretically not possible to surpass it all in a script that had never been recorded before and so the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began and age of reason and rationality was born from its study God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
I thank David Wood for helping me in my lessons in the Defense Against Islam. Now Muslims who tried to take advantage of my lack of knowledge of scripture (I’m still reading the New Testament) can no longer get away with lying to me. And without lies, Islam dies.
I, myself, have read the Bible, Quran and parts of Bhagadavad Gita. It is important to read those scriptures at least once and then it’s harder for people to manipulate you.
Thomas Jefferson learned Arabic for the express purpose so that he can learn how to read the Quran. Once he did he realized how dangerous that religion was
Yeah, Thomas actually wanted to have peace with some Muslims who had been raiding American shipping vessels and enslaving the crews and he asked what kind of arrangement they could make to get that to stop. They told him that was impossible because their prophet commanded them to wage war and enslave anyone who wasn’t Muslim. So I’m not surprised that once he was told that he wanted to find out what else their prophet asked of them.
@@ranro7371yeah, we’ve seen your replies to every other comment on this video. We’re trying to talk about Thomas Jefferson right now though, luckily he wrote in English so we know what he had to say.
@@ranro7371 if that’s the case allah also made some big historical blunders such as Mary being a part of the trinity, mistaking Ezra for being the son of God, mistaking Mary the mother of Jesus for the sister of Moses and Aaron. Yeah really looks inspired.
I started reading the Quran to understand where my muslim friends were coming from and i expected a chronological telling of events and detailed introduction of characters like in the bible...but it started very randomly with random people being mentioned here and there with no context whatsoever as to who they were or what they did, completely incoherent...honestly if i didnt have previous biblical knowledge about certain characters, I'd have been totally lost and confused after the first pages. ...talking about the true 'author of confusion' 👀
I've noticed the same issue with the Quran. The chapters and verses aren't in chronological order. Chapter 9 of the Quran comes in the beginning of the book, but yet according to the Hadiths, its the soo called last group of revelations Mohammed "received", so technically it should come at the end of the book and not the beginning. The Quran is a disaster.
@@ranro7371 if that’s the case then allah made som big historical blunders such as Mary being a part of the trinity, mistaking Ezra for the son of God, mistaking Mary the mother of Jesus for the sister of Moses and Aaron and denying Jesus died at crucifixtion.
Btw, if they say "Trust me, I read it in Arabic and it's the most beautiful book ever," you can answer them "Have you read then all the books of the world in their original languages?" Quixote in Spanish, La Divina Comedia in Italian, Genji Monogatari in Japanese, etc. etc. etc.
@@ranro7371Arabic is both old, simple and caries a very ugly tongue. There's a very good reason there are more modern and versatile languages. But seriously, do you really believe a lot of people will read your miles of lazy copy/pasting?
The examples cited are misrepresented, of the verses he cites: Surah An-Nisaa Aya 46 which Addresses people like those in the video who take verses from the Quran out of their context. Infact even the examples he is using, Surah Al-Sajdah, Surah 32 which he begins with it starts with addressing all of mankind Surah Al-Nahl, Surah 16 in the verse he is citing it is again addressing all of mankind, saying that Islam is the truth, addressing those who worship tyrant/leaders, Surah Ya-Sin, the 34th surah Aya 1-16 is deliberatley misinterpeted to have been referring to Arabs, when infact it is addressing all of those who know about or heard the Quran, the same is true for literally every verse he cites, go to his citation and read the preceding verses to see for yourself, every single point raised here is addressed in the Qur'an itself. In addition from Surahs he does not cite: Surah Al-Ma'idah Aya - 48 shows that the Quran supersedes all other revelations Surah Al-Nisaa Aya - 46 Addresses people like those in the video who take verses from the Quran out of their context Surah Aal-Imraan Aya 96 - Addresses all of mankind Surah Al-Baqarah Aya 1-7, The first Surah after the opening has all the point addressed and example of people like him rebuked Surah Al-Hujurat Aya 13 - Addresses the creation of humanity into different peoples Surah Al-A'raaf Aya 171 to 178, - Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge Surah Al-Jumu'a Aya 1 to 8 Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge Surah Al-Anbiya 107 - The role of the prophet The Aramaic word for God is Alaha. It's the word Isa PBUH (Jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J). Sounds familiar? Written without the confusing vowels, it is A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), adducted from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum) 'A-L-L-H' (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha). The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes as aforementioned. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one. In addition, The word God in hebrew is eloah, is a cognate of the Arabic I-L-H, pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it into eloh, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elah. Infact it is written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic cause it is an Alef with hamza below (إ أ ) They are two different forms of Alef. And it mean "a god", it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا) "protosemetic" Alphabet (29), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22) 𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼 ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic: ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining The reason why the protoS alphabet here is 28 and not 29, is because the supposed extra letter is simply a س written in a different position, but it was shoehorned to obfuscated. In Arabic letter shapes are different depending on whether they are in the beginning , middle or end of a word. This kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua. As a matter of fact, all of the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and their complexity was derived from the Qur'an. It was by analyzing the syntactic structure of the Qur'an that the Arabic root system was developed. This system was first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, which preceded the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years. It was through this development that the concept of Arabic roots was established and later co-opted into the term 'semitic root,' allowing the decipherment of ancient scripts. In essence, they quite literally copied and pasted the entirety of the Arabic root. Hebrew had been dead, as well as all the other dialects of Arabic, until being 'revived' in a Frankensteinian fashion in the 18th and 19th centuries. The entire region spoke basically the same language, with mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language gradually became more degenerate, and then the Qur'an appeared with the oldest possible form of the language thousands of years later. This is why the Arabs of that time were challenged to produce 10 similar verses, and they couldn't. People think it's a miracle because they couldn't do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself. They had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision. And when I say mathematical, I quite literally mean mathematical. Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken? The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study.real God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
Part 2 Language; When you look at the actual linguistics, you'll find that many were puzzled by the opposite, that is, how the other "semetic" (why in quotes will be revealed later) languages were more "evolved" than Arabic, while Arabic had archaic features, not only archaic compared to bibilical Hebrew, Ethiopic, "Aramaic" contemporary "semetic" languages, but even archaic compared to languages from ancient antiquity; Ugaritic, Akkadain. What is meant here by Archaic is not what most readers think, it is Archaic not in the sense that it is simple, but rather that it is complex (think Latin to pig Latin or Italian or Old English, which had genders and case endings to modern English), not only grammatically, but also phonetically; All the so called semitic languages are supposed to have evolved from protosemetic, the Alphabet for protosemitic is that of the so called Ancient South Arabian (which interestingly corresponds with the traditional Arabic origins account) and has 28 Phonemes. Arabic has 28 phonemes. Hebrew has 22, same as Aramaic, and other "semitic" languages. Now pause for a second and think about it, how come Arabic, a language that is supposed to have come so late has the same number of letters as a language that supposedly predates it by over a millennium (Musnad script ~1300 BCE). Not only is the glossary of phonemes more diverse than any other semitic language, but the grammar is more complex, containing more cases and retains what's linguists noted for its antiquity, broken plurals. Indeed, a linguist has once noted that if one were to take everything we know about languages and how they develop, Arabic is older than Akkadian (~2500 BCE). |Classical Arabic | 28 consonants, 29 with Hamza and 6 vowels; some consonants are emphatic or pharyngealized; some vowels are marked with diacritics | Complex system of word formation based on roots and patterns; roots are sequences of consonants that carry the basic meaning of a word; patterns are sequences of vowels and affixes that modify the meaning and function of a word | Flexible word order, but VSO is most common; SVO is also possible; subject and object are marked by case endings (-u for nominative, -a for accusative, -i for genitive); verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different moods and aspects | | Akkadian | 22 consonants and 3 vowels; some consonants are glottalized or palatalized; vowels are not marked | Similar system, but with different roots and patterns; some roots have more than three consonants; some patterns have infixes or reduplication | Fixed word order of SVO; subject and object are not marked by case endings, but by prepositions or word order; verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different tenses and aspects | | Aramaic | 22 consonants and 3 vowels (later variants have more); no emphatic or pharyngealized consonants (except in some dialects); vowels are not marked (except in later variants such as Syriac) | Simple system of word formation based on prefixes and suffixes; some roots or patterns exist, but are less productive than in Arabic or Akkadian | Arabic is the only corollary to proto-semitic, infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning mass between their ears. hebrew, aramaic, rest of madeup dialect continua only have 22 letters of the 29 protosemitic letters Arabic has all 29. The difference betweeen Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as that between Latin and pig latin or italian. "Semitic" is just mumbled Arabic, really. Imagine English with a third of its letters removed and simplified grammar. That's Aramaic, Hebrew, etc. For example, combine T and D into just T; there's no need to have 2 letters. The same goes for i, e, y - they should all be just y from now on, etc., etc. Arabic is the only corollary to proto-Semitic. In fact, the whole classification of Semitic languages is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning brain. Hebrew, Aramaic, and the rest of these made-up dialect continua only have 22 letters out of the 29 proto-Semitic letters. Arabic has all 29. The difference between Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as the difference between Latin and pig Latin or Italian. "Phoenician" is an Arabic dialect continuum, and not only that, it is pidgin. It is simplified to the point of stupidity. Anyone with a basic knowledge of Arabic would see this clearly. What happened was that Arabic handicapped "scholars" saw the equivalent of Scottish Twitter spelling, with added mumbling due to phonemic mergers (22 letters, not 29), and mistakenly thought they were seeing a different language." God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
Let's start with a simple sentence: The house is big. How would you say it in different Semitic languages? Arabic: البيتُ كبيرٌ al-bayt-u kabīr-un Proto-Semitic: *ʔal-bayt-u kabīr-u Hebrew: הבית גדול ha-bayit gadol Akkadian: bītum rabûm Amharic: ቤቱ ገደሉ betu gedelu Arabic and Proto-Semitic have the same word order (noun-adjective), the same definite article (al-), and the same case endings (-u for nominative). Hebrew and Akkadian have lost the case endings and changed the definite article (ha- and -um respectively). Amharic has changed the word order (adjective-noun) and the definite article (u-). But Arabic is not only similar to Proto-Semitic, it is also pre-Semitic, meaning that it is the original form of Semitic before it split into different branches. This is because Arabic preserves many features that are not found in any other Semitic language, but are found in other Afro-Asiatic languages, such as Egyptian and Berber. These features include: - The definite article al-, which is derived from the demonstrative pronoun *ʔal- 'that'. This article is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the article n- in Berber and the article p-, t-, n- in Egyptian. - The dual number for nouns and verbs, which is marked by the suffix -ān or -ayn. This number is rare in other Semitic languages, but it is common in other Afro-Asiatic languages, such as Egyptian and Berber. - The imperfective prefix t- for verbs, which indicates the second person singular feminine or third person plural feminine. This prefix is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the prefix t- in Berber and Egyptian. - The passive voice for verbs, which is marked by the infix t between the first and second root consonants. This voice is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the passive voice in Egyptian and Berber. Finally, let's look at a more complex sentence: The letter was written with a pen. Arabic: كُتِبَتِ الرِّسَالَةُ بِالقَلَمِ kutiba-t al-risāla-t-u bi-l-qalam-i Proto-Semitic: *kutiba-t ʔal-risāla-t-u bi-l-qalam-i Hebrew: המכתב נכתב בעט ha-michtav niktav ba-et Akkadian: šipram šapāru bēlum Egyptian: sḏm.n.f p-ẖry m rnp.t Berber: tturra-t tibratin s uccen In the examples Arabic and Proto-Semitic have the same word order (verb-subject-object), the same passive voice marker (-t-), the same definite article (al-), and the same preposition (bi-). Hebrew has changed the word order (subject-verb-object), lost the passive voice marker, changed the definite article (ha-) and the preposition (ba-). Akkadian has changed the word order (object-subject-verb), lost the passive voice marker, changed the definite article (-um) and the preposition (bēlum). These examples show that classical Arabic has more consonants and vowels than other semitic languages, and that it preserves some sounds that were lost or changed in other semitic languages. This means that classical Arabic can encode more information in a given unit of speech than other semitic languages, and that it is closer to the original sound system of protosemitic., we can see that classical Arabic has more grammatical features than the other languages, such as case endings, mood endings, and root and pattern system. These features make classical Arabic more expressive and precise than the other languages, as it can convey more information and nuances in a single word or phrase. Classical Arabic is also more flexible than the other languages, as it can use different word orders and verb forms to emphasize different aspects of the sentence. Classical Arabic is therefore older and more original than the other languages. "Semitic" is just mumbled Arabic, really. Imagine English with a third of its letters removed and simplified grammar. That's Aramaic, Hebrew, etc. For example, combine T and D into just T; there's no need to have 2 letters. The same goes for i, e, y - they should all be just y from now on, etc., etc. Arabic is the only corollary to proto-Semitic. In fact, the whole classification of Semitic languages is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning brain. Hebrew, Aramaic, and the rest of these made-up dialect continua only have 22 letters out of the 29 proto-Semitic letters. Arabic has all 29. The difference between Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as the difference between Latin and pig Latin or Italian. "Phoenician" is an Arabic dialect continuum, and not only that, it is pidgin. It is simplified to the point of stupidity. Anyone with a basic knowledge of Arabic would see this clearly. What happened was that Arabic handicapped "scholars" saw the equivalent of Scottish Twitter spelling, with added mumbling due to phonemic mergers (22 letters, not 29), and mistakenly thought they were seeing a different language." Matter of fact that all this, and the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and the complexity all of it was derived from the Qur'an, it was by analysing the syntactic structure of the Quran that the Arabic root system was developed, first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage (of the same language) dictionary of its kind, preceding the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years, that the concept of Arabic root was developed and later co-opted into "semitic root" that the ancient scripts were deciphered, they quite literally copy pasted the entirey of Arabic root. hebrew had been dead, and so were all the other dialects of Arabic until being "revived" in a frankensteinian fashion in the 18th, 19th centuries. The whole region spoke basically the same language, mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language became more degenerate and then the Quran appears with the oldest form possible of the language thousands of years later It is why the Arabs back then were challenged to produce 10 verses similar, and they couldnt. People think it's a miracle becau'e they couldnt do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself, they had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision behind it. And I quite literally mean, mathematical. Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of yeara later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before and in the highest form the language had ever taken and the language is lexically, syntactically, phonemically and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing, infact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it, and not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book that in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take, so high infact it is theoretically not possible to surpass it all in a script that had never been recorded before and so the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began and age of reason and rationality was born from its study God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
I tried reading the Quran several years ago, and was impressed to learn how short it is compared to the Bible (shorter than the New Testament). It was so incoherent that I lasted 5 minutes and gave up not expecting anything beneficial to come of my invested time.
@@muhammadsair3598 funny thing is Muslim tell us mohammeds name is in songs of Solomon which are love letters between Solomon and wife used for marriage counseling in Christianity.
2 German universities researchers whose works on the Koran origins had their works suppressed by the german authorities & dismissed from their positions in the 70s when it they found most of the verses can be traced to new testament writings & christian hymn. It was feared that it would lead to riots in Germany then. The Koran was originally written in Nabataean language, not Arabic.
Right! The verse that says killing one innocent person is like Killing all people every Muslim brings up whenever a terr0r!st attack happens, is taken verbatim from the Talmud.
The Quran is taken from a whole bunch of religions, well, only what Muhammed knew about these religions, That's obvious from when Allah asks Jesus in the Quran if He "told people to make a God out of Him and His mother" its obvious that Muhammad didn't know that Muhammad didn't know that Christians never worshiped mary, they honor her, One other thing, is that at a certain point, Arabic language almost got lost to Turkish during the othmani "Turkish" invasion over Arabic regions. The only thing that kept the language from vanishing was priests hiding scrolls and books in churches, that's why every single Quran you find today is from after 1925(after the end of the othmani invasion)
@@ranro7371 _Matter of fact that all this,..._ It's already shown that nothing you are saying is a matter of fact except for the Koran being written in Arabic.
@@ranro7371 _Surah Al-Ma'idah Aya - 48 shows that the Quran supersedes all other revelations_ Why are you trolling, troll, as you will ignore this and not reply to it? But which that claim is discredited by the fact that all of that is because of one person, Mohammad, and isn't corroborated by anything else and no one is obligated to accept the uncorroborated, unsubstantiated claims of Mohammad. In other words, none of that means anything anyone is obligated to accept.
@@ranro7371 and who backs Mohammed? Who can vouch for him? No one, he did no miracles, no prophecy etc., no angels declared him, no scriptures foretold of him, no nothing. Just him and his word. You've been brainwashed by a cult. And yes I know about the sandstorm and the magic horse ride etc. God Bless!
The examples cited are misrepresented, of the verses he cites: Surah An-Nisaa Aya 46 which Addresses people like those in the video who take verses from the Quran out of their context. Infact even the examples he is using, Surah Al-Sajdah, Surah 32 which he begins with it starts with addressing all of mankind Surah Al-Nahl, Surah 16 in the verse he is citing it is again addressing all of mankind, saying that Islam is the truth, addressing those who worship tyrant/leaders, Surah Ya-Sin, the 34th surah Aya 1-16 is deliberatley misinterpeted to have been referring to Arabs, when infact it is addressing all of those who know about or heard the Quran, the same is true for literally every verse he cites, go to his citation and read the preceding verses to see for yourself, every single point raised here is addressed in the Qur'an itself. In addition from Surahs he does not cite: Surah Al-Ma'idah Aya - 48 shows that the Quran supersedes all other revelations Surah Al-Nisaa Aya - 46 Addresses people like those in the video who take verses from the Quran out of their context Surah Aal-Imraan Aya 96 - Addresses all of mankind Surah Al-Baqarah Aya 1-7, The first Surah after the opening has all the point addressed and example of people like him rebuked Surah Al-Hujurat Aya 13 - Addresses the creation of humanity into different peoples Surah Al-A'raaf Aya 171 to 178, - Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge Surah Al-Jumu'a Aya 1 to 8 Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge Surah Al-Anbiya 107 - The role of the prophet
Dear Dr. David, thank you so much for the incredible research you put into your videos. As an Assyrian, my people have also endured a lot of suffering due to Islam. I wish you the blessings of Jesus and hope you continue to have the strength to keep uploading these insightful videos.
@@ranro7371 _Here is a factual statement. The Arabic language is the oldest continually spoken language in the world, back._ The facts say that's not a factual statement.
I wish and pray my Muslim family will start asking question of there faith because I find it dificult for a Muslim to listen unless they start daughting.
@@ranro7371 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Still copying and pasting lies while you want others to fall for it stupidly like you do, Abdul?? The very 1st premise of Arabic being the oldest is super hilariously stupid because there are at least 3 or more languages that are waaaay older and still in use today!!! So therefore, your entire copy paste is totally meaningless because like the weak religion we hilariously call Islame, it’s crumbling like a thin wall of cards!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Because this is the internet I have to lead with this: I agree with you. Now, here's a related point that is valuable to know and I want to simply share it, not debate it. Only after protestant Christians printed copies of the New Testament in English AND taught people to read in English has the western world known what it was saying. Before, Catholics only printed it and read it in Latin at mass and didn't print extra copies and didn't teach the people to read Latin or understand what was being read to them. Once the protestants produced the Geneva editions, the Church of England, considered "Anglo-Catholic" or simply put not protestant, worked to print the King James Version. Sources say it is "unclear" whether the Church of England is "in communion with Rome" but I digress.
Surah Al-Nisaa Aya - 46 Addresses people like those in the video who take verses from the Quran out of their context. The examples cited are misrepresented, of the verses he cites: Surah Al-Sajdah, Surah 32 which he begins with it starts with addressing all of mankind Surah Al-Nahl, Surah 16 in the verse he is citing it is again addressing all of mankind, saying that Islam is the truth, addressing those who worship tyrant/leaders, Surah Ya-Sin, the 34th surah Aya 1-16 is deliberatley misinterpeted to have been referring to Arabs, when infact it is addressing all of those who know about or heard the Quran, the same is true for literally every verse he cites, go to his citation and read the preceding verses to see for yourself, every single point raised here is addressed in the Qur'an itself. In addition from Surahs he does not cite: Surah Al-Ma'idah Aya - 48 shows that the Quran supersedes all other revelations Surah Aal-Imraan Aya 96 - Addresses all of mankind Surah Al-Baqarah Aya 1-7, The first Surah after the opening has all the point addressed and example of people like him rebuked Surah Al-Hujurat Aya 13 - Addresses the creation of humanity into different peoples Surah Al-A'raaf Aya 171 to 178, - Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge Surah Al-Jumu'a Aya 1 to 8 Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge Surah Al-Anbiya 107 - The role of the prophet The Aramaic word for God is "Alaha". It's the word Isa PBUH used. Sounds familiar? Written without the confusing vowels it is written A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), reduced from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum) it is written in the Arabic script 'A-L-L-H' (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha) add an A before the last H for vocalization. The word God in another rendition in Hebrew ʾĕlōah is derived from a base ʾilāh, an Arabic word, written without confusing vowel it is A-L-H in the Arabic script, pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elaha. Infact both are written written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic and not A because it is an Alef with hamza below (إ أ ) They are two different forms of Alef. And it mean "a god", it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا) Jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J. The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes as will be explained. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one. Schlözer in his preparation for the Arabia expedition in 1781 coined the term Semitic language: "From the Mediterranean to the Euphrates, from Mesopotamia to Arabia ruled one language, as is well known. Thus Syrians, Babylonians, Hebrews, and Arabs were one people (ein Volk). Phoenicians (Hamites) also spoke this language, which I would like to call the Semitic (die Semitische)." -Before Boas: The Genesis of Ethnography and Ethnology in the German By Han F. Vermeulen. He was only half right though, Arabic is the only corollary to "proto-semitic", infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical as will be shown. "Semitic" is just mumbled Arabic, really. Imagine English with a third of its letters removed and simplified grammar. That's Aramaic, Hebrew, etc. For example, combine T and D into just T; there's no need to have 2 letters. The same goes for i, e, y - they should all be just y from now on, etc., etc. Arabic is the only corollary to proto-Semitic. In fact, the whole classification of Semitic languages is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning brain. Hebrew, Aramaic, and the rest of these made-up dialect continua only have 22 letters out of the 29 proto-Semitic letters. Arabic has all 29. The difference between Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as the difference between Latin and pig Latin or Italian. "Phoenician" is an Arabic dialect continuum, and not only that, it is pidgin. It is simplified to the point of stupidity. Anyone with a basic knowledge of Arabic would see this clearly. What happened was that Arabic handicapped "scholars" saw the equivalent of Scottish Twitter spelling, with added mumbling due to phonemic mergers (22 letters, not 29), and mistakenly thought they were seeing a different language." "protosemetic" Alphabet (29), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22) 𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼 ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic: ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining protoS 29th is a س written in a different position, but was shoehorned to obfuscate. This kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua. As a matter of fact, all of the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and their complexity was derived from the Qur'an. It was by analyzing the syntactic structure of the Qur'an that the Arabic root system was developed. This system was first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, which preceded the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years. It was through this development that the concept of Arabic roots was established and later co-opted into the term 'semitic root,' allowing the decipherment of ancient scripts. In essence, they quite literally copied and pasted the entirety of the Arabic root. Hebrew had been dead, as well as all the other dialects of Arabic, until being 'revived' in a Frankensteinian fashion in the 18th and 19th centuries. The entire region spoke basically the same language, with mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language gradually became more degenerate, and then the Qur'an appeared with the oldest possible form of the language thousands of years later. This is why the Arabs of that time were challenged to produce 10 similar verses, and they couldn't. People think it's a miracle because they couldn't do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself. They had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision. And when I say mathematical, I quite literally mean mathematical. Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken? The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study.real God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
A language may or may not be beautiful, wonderful, etc, but this is extremely subjective. For me personally, I cannot accept the superiority of Arabic as the quran fails in delivery or communication. I have had several years of experience of training people in communication, and the number one rule is to know your audience and communicate in clear precise sentences according to the comprehension level of your audience. Nevertheless, the quran fails in this regard. 🥺
I was hit by the irony that Allah ordained for the Arabic people to have the message in their language last yet he picked Muhammad who couldn't read it or write it to reveal it to them in Arabic. In fact, other people would have to remember and recite it and write it down for Muhammad to preserve it for the Arabic people.
That's the miracle, so that now you can't say that all the stuff in the Quran is what the prophet knew already because he was a genius and studied every book they had - in the huge libraries of the desert -
@@btc-newswait are joking about his reading every book in the desert. Because I think it was just established that he was illiterate. Maybe I am missing the joke
I tried to read the English version once... probably got like 1/4 through and OMG, definitely very much all over the place little to no structure. Alot of threats for hell fire 🔥🔥🔥
One of the reason I left Islam was prayers in Arabic why can't my god take prayer in my native language Thanks to Nabeel Qureshi's book I found Jesus Christ the lord and savior who dont have any language barrier to pray
@@hrangkhol9057 Actually Indian was extremely religious even studied under big ulamas (big religious teachers ) used to lead prayer even in ramadan for tarweeh ( long prayer ) Moved to Middle east to live Islamic faced Arab non Arab discrimination started to study with open mind became atheist then a friend who was running underground church suggested Nabeels book Seeking allah finding Jesus it changed life Started to study myself thanks to bible app by yourvision and free kindle version of bible with christian channels in youtube Accepted Jesus Christ just few months back but still cant express due to fear of actions from peaceful fellow muslims
I was just browsing on line when I came across your video. Two minutes in and I was hooked. My instincts told me that there were problems with the bits of the Qur'an I had been exposed to but I just set these aside. Your video has given me the inspiration to read up and study the subject more deeply. Thank you for a thoroughly inspiring twenty five minutes. I will of course be studying my bible more deeply as a result!
My two daughters studied arabic as compulsory subject in school in Dubai, and French as optional subject. They scored 100% in French and are pretty proficient in reading, writing and can comprehend . Whereas arabic language has been frustrating to them in spite of private coaching!! What an imperfect language
Skill issue. Since you’re here writing in English with an English based username, I’m pretty confident in betting you’re a native English speaker, or the very least a European speaker. Arabic is a very different language because it’s Semetic language. So learning it requires a complete rebuild of how you approach and relate with language. US state department puts it in the very hard category, and they’d know a thing or 80 about teaching people languages. I’m a native English speaker and it took me about six years to actually get good at Russian, and that’s another European language, which works about 80% the same. You’re an adequacy it’s not a problem on God’s part it’s your issue.
A muslim youtuber in my country once said "if you find some verses doesn't make any sense, DON'T EVER QUESTION!! because that's might be a Mutasyabihat verses!! If you trying to question it, you are a sinner!" What a joke
Thank you for this insight. I am a teacher, so I thought I should be able to understand what I am reading but often, after reading and rereading some verses of the Quran I still could not make sense of it. I was beginning to wonder if there was something wrong with me. What a relief to hear that even experts find it unintelligible.
@jazzymilesmiles3308We have Greeks and bible scholars whi studied Hebrew in our church so we have no trouble with getting the text in uts original language. By the way it still says the same thing no matter what language and we know this as we are a mostly African church who read the bible in West African languages and when compared to the Greek, Hebrew and English it says the same thing.
@jazzymilesmiles3308 You are contradicting yourself. Can you read Arabic? If you can read Arabic, why do you need an Imam? If you can't read Arabic, and need an Imam, you are being a hypocrite since you are the same as you are accusing Christians of being.
@@ranro7371 The facts are that is false Arabic is the oldest continually spoken language of the world. Chinese, Aramaic and Sanskrit are older. You really should refrain from Islamic indoctrinated propaganda. You are as bad as the Catholic church!
Why does Allah keep reminding me how gracious and merciful and loving He is? The Lord Jesus Christ showed me how gracious and merciful and loving He is on the cross, no need to tell people how mighty He is.❤
@@JKRucit reminds me of this passage: ”How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High. Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit.“ Isaiah 14:12-15 KJV
Would not a god prove his words true with his deeds, unless the god was a deceiver. And Allah does call himself the greatest deceiver, so.. Can't expect actual mercy or compassion except in words.
Trinitarians are inoculated from rationality, facts and logic. It is no surprise that basic reasoning is entirely lost on those that believe that the creator became one of those he created in order to save the created from his own self. Not to mention the incoherence in the scripture, never minding the creed itself. Matthew 4:1) Jesus was tempted [James 1:13) God cannot be tempted (John 1:29) Jesus was seen (1 John 4:12) No man has ever seen God (Acts 2:22) Jesus was and is a man, sent by God (Numbers 23:19, Hosea 11:9) God is not a man (Hebrews 5:8-9) Jesus had to grow and learn (Isaiah 40:28) God doesn't ever need to learn (1 Corinthians 15: 3-4) Jesus Died (1 Timothy 1:17) God cannot die (Hebrews 5:7) Jesus needed salvation (Luke 1:37) God doesn't need salvation (John 4:6) Jesus grew weary (Isaiah 40:28) God cannot grow weary (Mark 4:38) Jesus slept (Psalm 121: 2-4) God doesn't sleep (John 5:19) Jesus wasn't all powerful (Isaiah 45: 5-7) God is all powerful (Mark 13:32) Jesus wasn't all knowing (Isaiah 46:9) God is all knowing
@@mznxbcv12345 These "contradictions" show that you do not understand the concept of the Trinity. The essence of God is distinct from His ability to manifest within creation. Allah is weaker than Yahweh in that Allah has a bunch of things he cannot do that Yahweh actually can. Allah cannot enter into creation and cannot experience creation. Yahweh is outside of creation, but He is nonetheless able to manifest within His creation and experience it. He is capable of voluntarily limiting Himself and voluntarily subjecting Himself to the rules He placed upon creation. Yahweh is capable of meeting with us face-to--face. He is capable of loving us on a personal level. While His essence is beyond our comprehension, He can interact with us in a form that we can comprehend. And He can do these things while still retaining His complete essence. Unlike Allah, Yahweh can be more than one thing at once. Yahweh can be in more than one place at once. Yahweh is not a man, even though He can choose to be in the form of one.
@@mznxbcv12345 Do you want to understand the concept of the Trinity? The essence of God is distinct from His ability to manifest within creation. Allah is weaker than Yahweh in that Allah has a bunch of things he cannot do that Yahweh actually can. Allah cannot enter into creation and cannot experience creation. Yahweh is outside of creation, but He is nonetheless able to manifest within His creation and experience it. He is capable of voluntarily limiting Himself and voluntarily subjecting Himself to the rules He placed upon creation. Yahweh is capable of meeting with us face-to--face. He is capable of loving us on a personal level. While His essence is beyond our comprehension, He can interact with us in a form that we can comprehend. And He can do these things while still retaining His complete essence. Unlike Allah, Yahweh can be more than one thing at once. Yahweh can be in more than one place at once. Yahweh is not a man, even though He can choose to be in the form of one.
@@mznxbcv12345 The essence of God is distinct from His ability to manifest within creation. Allah is not like Yahweh in that Allah has a bunch of things he cannot do that Yahweh actually can. Allah cannot enter into creation and cannot experience creation. Yahweh is outside of creation, but He is nonetheless able to manifest within His creation and experience it. He is capable of voluntarily limiting Himself and voluntarily subjecting Himself to the rules He placed upon creation. Yahweh is capable of meeting with us face-to--face. He is capable of loving us on a personal level. While His essence is beyond our comprehension, He can interact with us in a form that we can comprehend. And He can do these things while still retaining His complete essence. Unlike Allah, Yahweh can be more than one thing at once. Yahweh can be in more than one place at once. Yahweh is not a man, even though He can choose to be in the form of one.
I beg to differ. The Christians hijacked the Jewish scripture and have made all sorts of inaccurate translations. One simple example being עלמה translated as a virgin when the Hebrew word means a young woman. And much more contradictions between the new testament and the original Scripture handed down to the Jews. .
I recently saw a Video where a London based researcher went into a Bookshop in Cairo wanting to buy a Koran in Arabic. She was asked: which Koran do you want? Taken aback she asked: how many are for sale in the Bookshop. She purchased a copy of them all...........30 !!!!!!!!! On researching them in London she and her team listed 9000 variations.
Amazing David! Thanks so much for all that you do. I have a good friend who is muslim and says he knows either Christianity or Islam is correct, but doesn't know which. He is open to the gospel and wants to learn, but he is being fed so many lies from the Imam (and speaks to Uthman)...... these videos are so helpful - thank you so much. praying for you and Marie and your bambinos x
You’re so lucky your friend is open. My Muslim friend won’t even read the Quran nor is open to knowing the Bible. In other words, she claims Muslim but lives Agnostic. I ask everyone for prayer 🙏 ❤
Rudyard Kipling Made Exceedingly Great Rewards Abraham Was Flawed Izaak carried the covenant on. Ishmael didn't. Though Abraham wanted them both to. There's something dangerous in the stew. The Living Bread Greatest Physician Mission Bruderhof. Van Gogh Joni Mitchell Crazy? Listen to her song on 1 Corinthians 13
@@7EmpathicBeauty For many in the west, following Islam is primarily a form of rebellion against Christianity, fueled by cultural pressures or some kind of personal beef. It doesn't matter what's in the Quran, only that it isn't the Bible. I wonder if your friend is in that category.
@@ranro7371 The Quran takes itself out of context. The chapters are all scrambled out of chronological order. You insist that the Quran is for all people, not just the Arabs. Tell me, how is the Quran better than the Gospel? Do you know what the Gospel is? Do you know what God did for humanity so that we no longer need to fear hell? Why is it that Muhammad was still afraid of hell if he was indeed a true prophet?
Surah Al-Nisaa Aya - 46 Addresses people like those in the video who take verses from the Quran out of their context. The examples cited are misrepresented, of the verses he cites: Surah Al-Sajdah, Surah 32 which he begins with it starts with addressing all of mankind Surah Al-Nahl, Surah 16 in the verse he is citing it is again addressing all of mankind, saying that Islam is the truth, addressing those who worship tyrant/leaders, Surah Ya-Sin, the 34th surah Aya 1-16 is deliberatley misinterpeted to have been referring to Arabs, when infact it is addressing all of those who know about or heard the Quran, the same is true for literally every verse he cites, go to his citation and read the preceding verses to see for yourself, every single point raised here is addressed in the Qur'an itself. In addition from Surahs he does not cite: Surah Al-Ma'idah Aya - 48 shows that the Quran supersedes all other revelations Surah Aal-Imraan Aya 96 - Addresses all of mankind Surah Al-Baqarah Aya 1-7, The first Surah after the opening has all the point addressed and example of people like him rebuked Surah Al-Hujurat Aya 13 - Addresses the creation of humanity into different peoples Surah Al-A'raaf Aya 171 to 178, - Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge Surah Al-Jumu'a Aya 1 to 8 Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge Surah Al-Anbiya 107 - The role of the prophet The Aramaic word for God is "Alaha". It's the word Isa PBUH used. Sounds familiar? Written without the confusing vowels it is written A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), reduced from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum) it is written in the Arabic script 'A-L-L-H' (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha) add an A before the last H for vocalization. The word God in another rendition in Hebrew ʾĕlōah is derived from a base ʾilāh, an Arabic word, written without confusing vowel it is A-L-H in the Arabic script, pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elaha. Infact both are written written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic and not A because it is an Alef with hamza below (إ أ ) They are two different forms of Alef. And it mean "a god", it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا) Jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J. The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes as will be explained. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one. Schlözer in his preparation for the Arabia expedition in 1781 coined the term Semitic language: "From the Mediterranean to the Euphrates, from Mesopotamia to Arabia ruled one language, as is well known. Thus Syrians, Babylonians, Hebrews, and Arabs were one people (ein Volk). Phoenicians (Hamites) also spoke this language, which I would like to call the Semitic (die Semitische)." -Before Boas: The Genesis of Ethnography and Ethnology in the German By Han F. Vermeulen. He was only half right though, Arabic is the only corollary to "proto-semitic", infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical as will be shown. "Semitic" is just mumbled Arabic, really. Imagine English with a third of its letters removed and simplified grammar. That's Aramaic, Hebrew, etc. For example, combine T and D into just T; there's no need to have 2 letters. The same goes for i, e, y - they should all be just y from now on, etc., etc. Arabic is the only corollary to proto-Semitic. In fact, the whole classification of Semitic languages is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning brain. Hebrew, Aramaic, and the rest of these made-up dialect continua only have 22 letters out of the 29 proto-Semitic letters. Arabic has all 29. The difference between Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as the difference between Latin and pig Latin or Italian. "Phoenician" is an Arabic dialect continuum, and not only that, it is pidgin. It is simplified to the point of stupidity. Anyone with a basic knowledge of Arabic would see this clearly. What happened was that Arabic handicapped "scholars" saw the equivalent of Scottish Twitter spelling, with added mumbling due to phonemic mergers (22 letters, not 29), and mistakenly thought they were seeing a different language." "protosemetic" Alphabet (29), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22) 𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼 ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic: ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining protoS 29th is a س written in a different position, but was shoehorned to obfuscate. This kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua. As a matter of fact, all of the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and their complexity was derived from the Qur'an. It was by analyzing the syntactic structure of the Qur'an that the Arabic root system was developed. This system was first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, which preceded the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years. It was through this development that the concept of Arabic roots was established and later co-opted into the term 'semitic root,' allowing the decipherment of ancient scripts. In essence, they quite literally copied and pasted the entirety of the Arabic root. Hebrew had been dead, as well as all the other dialects of Arabic, until being 'revived' in a Frankensteinian fashion in the 18th and 19th centuries. The entire region spoke basically the same language, with mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language gradually became more degenerate, and then the Qur'an appeared with the oldest possible form of the language thousands of years later. This is why the Arabs of that time were challenged to produce 10 similar verses, and they couldn't. People think it's a miracle because they couldn't do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself. They had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision. And when I say mathematical, I quite literally mean mathematical. Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken? The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study.real God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
Human Authors write books which are eloquent, clearly-written and are highly organized and in chronological order. Shame that cannot be said of the Arabic Qur'an, whose Author is supposed to be GOD.
And the Bible by comparison is a masterpiece. God used symbology all the way back in Exodous to illustrate Jesus being the lamb of God. And baptism too! The Isrealites walked through the red sea (water) that then separated them and destroyed Egypts armies (sin) just like being baptized separates us just like the Red Sea. While we still brought our sinful nature through the water (just like Isreal), we can now work to purify our hearts for God (like the law for Isreal). Also continued symbol like Isreal being the fig tree gets references many times. Jesus references back to Noah and Sodom and Gamorah. Prophicies were fulfilled but more will be fulfilled when he returns because the Jewish leaders didn't consider that possibility (plot twist). It's just an amazing and real story that's been written in historical action over thousands of years
@@ranro7371 sorry mate, you copy pastes nonsensical babble. The Quran confirms the legitimacy of the Bible in its suras even though the Bible is both far more detailed in accounting of the events and written by eye witnesses to what occurred in most instances especially in the testimony of Jesus. So if Quran contradicts the Bible's 4 books writing about him from accounts of eye witnesses written by 2 followers, 1 secondary follower, and 1 historian, that has far greater legitimacy than a contradictory account written 600 years later in a book that both confirms the Bible is correct and contradicts it. So the answer is to seek the truth and read the gospels that detail the life of Jesus and his teachings. These are recorded in the Bible in the books of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. This will clarify what the Quran has always been missing (to state it minimally).
@@ranro7371 All that copy/paste babble/nonsense doesn't do it for most of us. We know the origins of the Qur'an and from where it came from, and who wrote it. The Qur'an is NOT an original Divine Source, because it's teachings were plagiarised, copy/pasted from previously existing books (the Holy Bible) and teachings/traditions taken from other religions like Hinduism and Zoroastrianism. Also, the Qur'an teaches fantasy stories and legends copied from the Jews. Your Allah doesn't have Divine knowledge or wisdom - if he did, he would not have texts copied and pasted from other previously existing sources. Mohammad was NOT a prophet of God, and there already exists an abundance of proof for his life and teachings. He Died 200 years BEFORE the Qur'an was compiled and put together. He had No Eyewitnesses to Any of his claims, and No one heard or saw Anything about his original claims about himself. Even some of Mohammad's companions doubted his teachings, and left him. They knew he was Faking revelations (Wahi). You can go Research this for yourself. You can see CIRA International and Dr Jay Smith, and several others Prove that your Qur'an is False and was written by humans, not GOD. They show it's origins and development from Islamic history as well. Rob Christian speaks Aramaic and he can show you that your Allah is NOT the God of the Holy Bible, and the word "Alaha" is a mistranslation. Our Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ, of the Holy Bible is not the same "Jesus" as your ISA in the Qur'an. Our Jesus is Far Superior in Divine Knowledge and Wisdom and is Eternal. In comparison between the Bible and the Qur'an - the Holy Bible is a "Living" Miraculous Theological Masterpiece compared to a Children's Fairytale Book of Legends.
@@ranro7371 so prove it. The Quran is just someone who speaks human revelations as if they come from God as a matter of manipulation. The dead sea scrolls prove that the Bible and Torah have not been altered at least 2300 years. Just because a man said it and wrote it down, doesn't make it true on that alone. The Bible is a library of books written over more than a thousand years by over 60 authors to whom all recorded history or were spoken to by God. Islam has one prophet. Judaism has 48 spanning over centuries. And many of them died for their prophicying. Seek God and it will all sort itself out. But that means you need to read the Bible or you can't say you've truly seeked. And no Christian or Jew is going to absorb all of your sins. Either you become a disciple of Jesus or you perish in the lake of fire. No amount of self righteousness can save you. So brother, I encourage you to seek. Just seek honestly and the rest will come.
@@ranro7371 You can babble and yak forever. We all know and have Proof that your Qur'an is NOT from God, and it's a copy/edit/paste work from previously existing sources - whether you like it or not. You can't change those Facts, so you will live in delusions and Lies for the rest of your life, if you choose to do so. Biographies of Mohammad's life and teachings bear Witness to his Evil and Ungodly behaviour, and his mentally-deranged state of mind. There were times when Mohammad submitted himself in Idolatry, while still claiming to be a Prophet. Sorry dear! Your efforts to defend your fake prophet and your stone moon-god Allah, have proven to be useless. Qur'an is a man-written book, and nothing within it shows the Divine Love of the True God, and His work of Salvation for mankind from sins. So I'll close with a thumbs down 👎 for this incoherent, disorganised book of Hatred, and Deceptive Lies, with no hope of Salvation to those who believe in it. CASE CLOSED 🔐
@@karimmezghiche9921 According to the (approved) hadith of Al-Bukhari, Mohammed is a pedophile (Aisha was nine). According to other hadith and Quranic verses, he is a slave-trader, adulterer and rapist of slave women, a torturer (cutting off opposite hands and feet, for example), and a slaughterer of hundreds (beheading Jews for wanting to remain Jews, for example). Tell me, please, why on earth would you want to follow the teachings of such a moral monster? Personally, I can't see how you can possibly justify it to yourself.
But do the arabs need another warner? Or would they be open to another warner? Given that the last warner was "bad news" and lied about being the last warner?
Basically, the Arabs could not be bothered to learn Hebrew, the language of their cousins, the Jews, to become monotheists and needed to have a book and prayers in their own language, but totally unrelated peoples are supposed to learn Arabic to be monotheists. Makes no sense!
I have listened to this post for the first time, am extremely impressed with the quality of your understanding, and knowledge of what you're tackling... God bless you David... I will be following.
Isn't it suspicious how Islam just happened to come into existence around the time when both the Byzantine and Parthian empires were exhausted from fighting each other and were ripe for conquest? All that was needed was a man (real or fictional) and idea (religion, holy book) to unite the Arabic tribes and galvanize them to attack their former overlords. Islam was founded as a pen-Semitic (Arab + Jew + Assyrian) empire to kick out the Indo-European Greeks and Persians from the Middle East and go on the offensive against them.
Finally someone who views Mohammed for what I understand him to be ...a prince who wanted to conquer but needed a unifying factor and chose to create his own religion scare a bunch of people ...I mean that was how for example emperor wu of han established a unified ideology he plucked all ideologies and unified them combining parts of original confucianism..legalists and other sects in china and finally got his own version of imperial confucianism
I am an Agnostic, I found this is a fantastic clear explanation of the Muslims lies. Interesting. I cant wait for a Muslim counter video to this fantastic video. Good job in being clear calm and precise David.
MASSIVELY SHARE THIS VIDEO PLEASE; ON ALL PLATFORMS WITH MAJORITY MUSLIM PEOPLE, THEY MUST HEAR THE TRUTH & BE SAVED/FREED FROM THE GRIP OF EVIL/MOHAMMED GOD BLESS YOU AS YOU DO & GOD BLESS YOU DAVID WOOD
A woman of Samaria came to draw water. Jesus said to her, “Give Me a drink.” 8For His disciples had gone away into the city to buy food. 9Then the woman of Samaria said to Him, “How is it that You, being a Jew, ask a drink from me, a Samaritan woman?” For Jews have no dealings with Samaritans. 10Jesus answered and said to her, “If you knew the gift of God, and who it is who says to you, ‘Give Me a drink,’ you would have asked Him, and He would have given you living water.” 11The woman said to Him, “Sir, You have nothing to draw with, and the well is deep. Where then do You get that living water? 12Are You greater than our father Jacob, who gave us the well, and drank from it himself, as well as his sons and his livestock?” 13Jesus answered and said to her, “Whoever drinks of this water will thirst again, 14but whoever drinks of the water that I shall give him will never thirst. But the water that I shall give him will become in him a fountain of water springing up into everlasting life.” 15The woman said to Him, “Sir, give me this water, that I may not thirst, nor come here to draw.” 16Jesus said to her, “Go, call your husband, and come here.” 17The woman answered and said, “I have no husband.” Jesus said to her, “You have well said, ‘I have no husband,’ 18for you have had five husbands, and the one whom you now have is not your husband; in that you spoke truly.” 19The woman said to Him, “Sir, I perceive that You are a prophet. 20Our fathers worshiped on this mountain, and you Jews say that in Jerusalem is the place where one ought to worship.” 21Jesus said to her, “Woman, believe Me, the hour is coming when you will neither on this mountain, nor in Jerusalem, worship the Father. 22You worship what you do not know; we know what we worship, for salvation is of the Jews. 23But the hour is coming, and now is, when the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth; for the Father is seeking such to worship Him. 24God is Spirit, and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth.” 25The woman said to Him, “I know that Messiah is coming” (who is called Christ). “When He comes, He will tell us all things.” 26Jesus said to her, “I who speak to you am He.” As Jesus makes perfectly clear in verse 22, salvation is of the JEWS, not of the Arabs; no apostle or prophet or messenger of God ever came from the Arabs, who were descended from Ishmael, the outcast, trouble making, accursed slave!
Here are three Quran verses every Christian needs to know:
ruclips.net/video/Giv-C3ipihM/видео.html
But but. You were able to understand the verses. Therefore, the book must be clear, Dr. D. Wood. Jk
thanks youtube for a muslim ad before this at 1x
David, do you have like a pdf material or word with all the references against Muhamed and quran so i can take, translate into my own language and show to my community? Bless you
Hamas, Al Queda, ISIS, Hazbulla, and so on have all 1 thing in common; Islam. I don't want to sound crazy but have you guys ever red the quran? There are passages in there where Mohammed calls for the killing of all Jews and that "the last hour" would not come until Muslims slaughter the Jews (Sahih Muslim 2922). And there's passages in there saying Muslims should not take Christians and Jews as friends because they are friends of eachother and Mohammed called Christians and Jews "unjust people" (Surah Al-Ma'idah - 51).
I am afraid these groups will not disappear until Islam disappears and people realize it's not a religion of peace but of war and terror, not all Muslims are bad people; some are Muslim by customs of the country they live in and family they have but never really read the quran and just try to live a good life.
The reason why Mohammed has this hatred against the Jews and Christians is because when Mohammed went to the Jews to prove to his followers he was a prophet (he said the Jews would confirm he was a prophet), the Jews send him packing and told him in his face he was wrong and not a prophet (and the Jews were right); that is where his hatred for Jews started. And likewise the Christians rejected Mohammed as a prophet, which caused his hatred for Christians. Islamists treat Mohammed like more than a prophet, they treat him like Messiah; Mohammed is a false prophet and false messiah leading many astray into hatred for one another even to the point of death.
All Israel is doing right now is self-defense, the land called Israel was never called Palestine and there was no Palestinian identity until the Muslims and Arabs made it up in the mid-late 1900's; it's a Islamic lie, because in Islam they are allowed to lie in war times; there has been war on and off since Israel's reestablishment and the aggressors are Islamic countries and Islamic terrorist groups funded by Islamic countries.
The land Israel; to who'm does it belong in the first place?
The Arabians Muslims, falsely identifying as Palestinians, argue it belongs to them but let's take a look at history and facts:
Before 1200 BC the land belonged to the Sea Peoples
In and after 1200 BC it belonged to Israelites
In 957 BC the Israelites build the first Temple
In 722 BC the Assyrians invade Israel and take over
In 586 BC the Babylonians invade the land and take over and causes the displacement of Israel
In 515 BC Israelites return to Israel and the second Temple is build
In 332 BC Alexander the great invades Israel and takes over
In 63 BC the Romans came and took over Israel but Israel was still considered a vassal State at that time
-
0 BC passing by the birth, life, death, resurrection and ascension of Jesus Christ of Nazareth we go into AD
-
In 70 AD the temple is destroyed
In 136 AD the Romans (ruled by Emperor Hadrian) named the area of modern Israel "Paleshtina" as an insult to the Jews after the Bar Kokhba revolt (because the Philistines were the enemy of ancient Israel).
In 343 AD the Christians take over the Roman empire, this was not a violent take over; it was by conversion
In 395 AD the Romans split
In 636 AD the Muslims invade, forcibly converting the Christians and Jews to Islam or killing them or enslaving them or running them off by force
In 1099 AD the Christians recapture Jerusalem and the surrounding areas, establishing the Crusader States
In 1291 AD the Mamluk Muslims invaded and took over the area, forcefully converting the Christians and Jews back to Islam
In 1517 AD the Ottoman empire invaded and conquered the region
In 1918 AD after World War I the Christians took back over the region, this was taken by England
In 1948 AD England "gives" the land back to the Jews and Israel is reestablished.
In 1948 AD it was not "given back" to the Jews exactly; there was a war following the 1947 UN partition plan, later, in 1948, following the declaration of the establishment of the State of Israel on May 14, 1948, Arabs launched a military intervention in what became the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, resulting in Israel gaining control of more land than allocated in the UN plan.
In present time, Israel owns the land and gave the Arabs who identify as "Palestinians" a piece of land called Gaza, in return Hamas (ruler of Gaza) sends Islamic terrorists to kill innocent civilians in Israel on October the 7th (just to name one example of the many examples) and declares Jihad; they want to take over Israel by force through murder, terrorism and destruction.
So who has the right to the land? Israel.
But let's give more facts and details:
- If we look into the Bible and the Torah it is clear it belongs to Israel (the Jews).
- Jews owned the land for 1411 years, the Muslims for 1090 years and the Christians for 515 years; so by years it belongs to the Jews.
- If the land belongs to the Natives of the land; the Natives of the land are Jews so it belongs to the Jews
- The "Philistines" are the ancient enemy of the Jewish people (which are not the Arabs that call themselves "Palestinians" today, and those people (the Philistines) are long gone from the world today)
- The Roman empire called the land "Paleshtina" as an insult as mentioned above and not "Palestine" actually, "Palestine" is just a misinterpreted of the word "Paleshtina"
- The matter of the fact is that "Palestine" and the "Palestinian people" are not more than a fiction, a fake, a propaganda made by the Arabs and Muslim world
- Israelis have no other country to go to, and this is the decisive truth that helped Israel win all its wars. Israelis have nowhere to go, therefore every war and every conflict is an existential threat to Israel. Muslims have about 50 countries, to live, go to, etc.
Facts, history and common sense says Israel belongs to the Jews and Islam is a threat to every human life; the Jew, the Christian and even the unbeliever.
Jes❤us power proof. Warning it last 72 hours
A Muslim once asked me how I thought I could ever talk to God if I didn’t speak Arabic? I asked him in return if he actually and really thought God only spoke one language. I told him that even he could speak 2 languages. He stared at me.
This is what centuries of inbreeding and punishing believers for _thinking_ does to people.
@jazzymilesmiles3308
Definitely not Arabic.
@jazzymilesmiles3308
Also, taste my shahada: *Muhammad is in Hell, eternally drowning in an ocean of boiling pig shit.*
@jazzymilesmiles3308well Aramaic. But that’s not the point: the point is that God is above all things. How anyone can think that if you don’t speak one language out of literally thousands that He wouldn’t talk to you is frankly absurd.
@jazzymilesmiles3308Aramaic,it’s on his birth certificate remember,when they completed the census form!55555
Most of Muslim friends admit they don't understand their book until they read the translation..
How many of them stick around after reading the translations? And how many of _them_ communicate by nervous winking?
😮😅😂
@@Earthangeljoela I think anastasia means that most people don't understand the Quran until they read the commentary.
@@EarthangeljoelaThe Bible’s original language isn’t even English. Also, the Bible in all of its translations is pretty clear and eloquent.
@@Earthangeljoelasir, get back on your meds
Even without theology, I would have more trust in a man who never sinned, performed miracles and taught good lessons.
Along with having multiple witnesses writing about him and all stories aligning in continuity.
All we can take away from Mohammed is he was a perverted Schizo that sold a hoax to Billions of People.
Wasn’t married , no multiple wives , no consummation marriage to kids. Just Jesus Christ The Son of the Living God
Bro told us to love our enemies. Who tf does that. Bro was something else
@@oevandrorealconfia4762 bruh my exact thoughts happy fathers btw if not to you then to yours for sure brother
there are not just abrahmic religions , we also have eastern dharmic religions , maybe you wanna have a look ? Like Hinduism,Buddhism,Jainism,Sikhism,shintoism etc , stop this desert abrahmic crap, Jesus was no god and a mere human, apart from it ,it is quite evident he meditated his years in India @@oevandrorealconfia4762
It still to this day, stuns me that an iliterate man in the 6th century a.d produces a little book, smaller than the N.T., with rough copy and paste texts from the Holy Bible, that he then does some editing on these copied texts, mixes them up a bit and voila he's got his revelation from allah! Seriously! Its utterly inconceivable to me. What am i missing?
Satan?
@@attitudeadjuster793Bingo. Islam is an anti-Christ. One of many.
His scribes
the masterful administration after muhammad died is the reason islam is still around, the rashidun under uthmand and umar codified and established the practices of islam, the only reason it remained so long is that it subsumed persia and claimed all the works of persian minds as muslim, hence the islamic golden age that ended in 1200
It’s the perfect tool for politicians and kings to maintain dominance
Anyone who hasn’t read the Quran should read it, and then give up after 5 minutes.
admittedly, I gave up years ago. I have now read it - the more I read, the more horrific it appears to be. I have started to delve in to the Sunnah, and honestly it is so disturbing. I just pray to the Lord that all the muslims who have been deceived by the false prophet find the real lord Jesus and his love, and realise that God wants us as his CHILDREN and not purely a slave as Muhammad says. I totally agree everyone should read the Qur'an - it is the most bizarre book ive ever seen.... and shows Islam for what it is - absolutely inspired by Satan! x
@@MicheMoffattand you’re probably more well read than ~80% of professed Muslims already!
it's so bad.
@@AD-cc7bjnot even trying to be mean
I as a Catholic read the first chapter and a bit of chapter 2 of the quran and I got so bored I got rid of the tab on my phone
The first time I read the Quran with translation, i immediately questioned all my beliefs about islam. The islam i was taught since childhood was totally different than the islam in the quran. Anyone who doesn't question islam while having read it with translation is a lost cause. ( Not definitely.)
@@redouan-nx5le lol imagine using hadiths to explain quran . they say allah gave them one book ,one truth 😁
@@groundzero5708 Allah gave then a clear book... but needs an imperfect book like Hadith and Tafseer to explain it. LMAOOO
Its very normal and logic, there are so many illogical and obscure suras that if you dont question the whole madness you may be viewed as unconsciousness.
@@redouan-nx5lefirst of all it is a crappy language second of all even if it wasn't a crappy language the Quran doesn't make sense had you actually read it you would know.
@@redouan-nx5leno translations are not interpretations in the Bible does make sense to anyone who has actually read it with an open mind. And of course I can tell that you have not read the Quran or the Holy Bible.
I read the Quran twice, two different translations, first I read it as it was written, the second time I read it chronologically. I really wanted to do my best to understand it and not judge it blindly. I read it with the best intentions. Yet every time I had a conversation with a Muslim that I had read it twice and I asked for clarification of some of the things I read I was told that you have to be Arabic to understand it. I couldn’t understand why it was even translated into English in the first place. I decided that if it could only be understood by Arabic people then it is a religion best left to Arabic speaking people. As anyone who becomes a Muslim who is not Arabic simply has no idea what they are actually following.
Remain an ignorant Christian who believes God can be killed by his creation…and be born from a woman. Good luck with miserable life here and beautiful hell in the hereafter
It was revealed in Arabic because the Illusory Truth Effect is easily implemented. 🤔
It is easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. Just know that the truth has little defense against a fool determined to believe a lie.
😁
@@ranro7371 no, the text is taken from the Jewish psalms, the book of wisdom of Solomon and a lot of phrases from aramaic heritage. 🎉🎉🎉
Reading the Quran in English is totally different translations to Arabic.
@@alphabeta86 Still same old Jewish and Aramaic content...
I started reading the Quran and got a headache after a few minutes. It looked like it was written by elementary school children with no understanding of language structure or composure.
Exactly, word salad.....
Such a correct explenation, i read once, full in my own language and it was struggling, i wonder how do they can get mind from there who are not speaker of arabic, jumping from one subject to other in next verse, obviously he Heard from someone to someone information and couldn't share
I did the same.. And i closed the book and left it.. 6 years later i tried it again.. This time i found a better translation.. And then i re-verted to Islam.. So maybe you just need to try a better translation.
“Because it’s not Aaaarraaabiiiiic”
You know arabic
I can already imagine the anxiety when translating something that's supposed to be sacred, holy, cannot be changed, yet also incomprehensible at the same time
I wonder though. I doubt Christian translators feel the same dread over it, when they can leave a footnote and explain that they don't know what it means... I think the trouble with the quran is that they have to perpetuate the lie that it has been preserved perfectly.
@@Earthangeljoela don't encourage this copypasta fanatic
That's because it's bollocks
@@josephbrandenburg4373footnotes in bibles on translation dont say that its unclear they give synonyms in most cases
Hasn't the bible also been translated
My friend, a Kurdish man from Mahaba, Iran (who sees the absurdity of all the Imams sitting around arguing all day long about how to interpret the Koran and of course never knowing/agreeing), said the Imams took all his father's savings slowly in time teaching him how to say certain prayers in Arabic as this is the only language that "Allah" speaks. If you don't know how to say these certain prayers in Arabic then he was told he wouldn't be able to get into heaven. Therefore, he slowly paid them until when all his money was gone at which time the Imams left never tp return again. And, I was also told by a radical muslim in Turkey (lived there for 2 years) the Koran cannot be translated due to, again, the fact that 'Allah's" only language in classical Arabic. Again, what a trap.
No no no man you not paaaay enough jiziyah, they proteeeeect you or in this case negleeeeect you smh they're doing the dawah dash out here we've all seen the commercial don't miss out on this special opportunity to get scammed by the Quran and Islam for a unlimited time only special price for you 🎉
Not that impressive as a god then if he only knows 1 language 😂
If you watch Apostate Prophet's video "Reading The Quran Turns Muslims Away", you will see that the imams are afraid of the Quran and the hadiths being translated into local languages, since the believers will be able to read the holy texts on their own and start to question the teachings of the imams. This will give rise to a sizable number of them leaving the religion and the imams losing their power over them. This also happened in Europe in the past. vis a vis Christianity
@@Redeemedbygrace-t5l
You said that Allah isn’t that impressive because he knows just one language. 😂
Very true since Al-low is MoeHamHead’s sock puppet. Think of Moe as a spiritual ventriloquist. 💀
@@JhutaNabi😂
This is the strongest rebuttal of Islam I have ever heard.
Muslim scholars and missionaries have been lying about the Quran to the world just to push their Islamic empire as far as they can.
I almost became Muslim because of people who lied about the Quran and sugar coated it to make it look more preety, but Jesus saved me from joining that cult
Fact
😂
i thought christian been spreading with lies..thats why most of them leave the church
That's 'Taqiyya' for you !
Ex Muslim from Turkey. Most Muslims have not even heard the names of these surahs. There is no one who reads hundreds of verses and tries to understand them. Only recite a few surahs during praying and they do not know even what it means in Turkish. They listen as if they were listening to Arabic folk songs without understanding it.
Imagine Arabs cussing them out in Arabic where turks say amen😂
It happened to me. With my friend who just converted to Islam. When I asked him many questions written in Qur'an. Then when he had enough of my questions he said. "Because you don't know Arabic!" And "you use wrong translation!".
It's the same thing they say every time when losing an argument on the internet. Don't forget, the Quran says about itself that the very Quran is 100% perfect and 100% clear, and then you have stuff like this. What a prideful deception.
You should read the Quran with them... then ask them what does this mean? Read the dodgy verses they do not want to read. XD
@@neochris2 islam is the biggest brain washing of all history
It's weird because I read a comment on the godlogic video saying the sheikh something who debated didn't understand Arabic so he couldn't possibly understand Islam and someone got angry and replied that someone didn't need to understand Arabic to learn Islam. So which is the truth? Should or shouldn't people understand Arabic to learn Islam? 😂 What inconsistent group of people they are
@@Ario26 inconsistent is the perfect word to describe muslims and islam
As a Christian i love David wood
Right? I'm an Orthodox Christian and what he says about Islam is true as does my fellow churchman Robert Spencer.
Me too @@Tsalagi978
Christianity and Islam are same icecream different flavors. My book is perfect; no my book is perfect. You go to hell if you don’t believe in my god; no infact you go to hell if you don’t believe in my god as well the blood sacrifice. Both demoting the concept of God to petty childish person who is very pro their club and very anti other club to the point that anyone not rooting for their club will be made to suffer for eternity. Absurd and funny people but fun to watch.
No homo?
Why coz he paddles lies and tells u what u wanna hear
You, David, are a godsend. I was having this conversation with my ex who is a muslim and he kept saying how beautiful Arabic is and that the Quran is written so well and I nearly gave into his advice to spend years studying Arabic, and probably then I still would be deemed not proficient enough to enjoy the true meaning of the Quran. You have probably saved countless others from wasted years as well. I only wish I had these videos 14 years ago...
If what they say is true then why is it that when Muhammad is preaching his Quran nobody is amazed by the eloquence of Allah but everyone think he’s a madman, who makes stuff up and is copying from old fables😂
I feel your pain of all the years you spent trying to make sense out of the CLEAR QURAN. Be happy that for some time now and forever, you have removed yourself from the cognitive dissonance and Quranic psycho-babel.
It's never a waste to study a new language! But I would pick Polish or Russian. 😀
You first mistake was dating a Muslim
@@josephbrandenburg4373 That's true, if done for the right reasons. I moved to France and learned the language. Unfortunately, the only guys who ever talk to me here are the Muhammadan variety.
This is true. In malaysia, muslim dont bother what is actually written in the alquran.
They will just follow what the dakwah people quote. Any quote that doesnt align with what threy say, they pretend ignore, or start attacking you.
Its the most craziest thing ever.
A lot of Muslim don’t even understand Arabic. Wow
It's like the Greek language it has classical Greek.
Sheep have difficulty with language Arabic or any other Language
But they are good at following other sheep!
A lot of Christians don't know Aremaic. What's your point?
With ppls
Ignorance, they're using Arabic as catholicism did with Latin. Same thing. Keep ppl in error.
@fakhriassad2801, we have God's Word in English! That is the "difference."
I also tried to read the Quran...and being Ukrainian myself, I'd rather read War and Peace 10 times in a row, without stopping, since it has a way more interesting and phenomenal story than the dry and contradictory words of Allah that make me scratch my head like a dog with 10,000 ticks!
And I guess War and Peace is better in Ukranian or Russian than it is in other languages (sinceit was written in Russian). I've been learning Polish, maybe I should give Ukranian a try? 🙂
😂😂
With all respect to the Ukrainian Muslims. You better deal with the invaders of your country over than making an absurd statement like this.
The stories do not a beginning nor an ending
I watch Christian Prince and I love how he discusses the Bible and Quran and makes it easy to understand
Hello David. Arabic is my first language. I can confirm that Arabic is not rich at all. Its the most confusing language ever. While English has adopted French, German, Spanish and other languages to give more shades and grades to any meaning, Arabic stays unflexible.
That heavily depends on the dialect you’re referring to. Moroccan Arabic (Darija) surprisingly has many vocabularies from French and Spanish. Talking about Classical Arabic your comment might be accurate.
@@redouan-nx5le Classical Arabic nope
@@redouan-nx5lethat doesn't change the fact that classical arabic is garbage. The Quran is nonsense and when you bring this up they always say, "but you should read it in arabic" yet the Quran says it's clear and also that some verses no ody understand but "allah".
It's clearly man-made and a cult
muslims : imagine a prophet called George. He demands you follow his pedoness and kill. he fullfills no prophecies, makes none, says he has no idea what will happen to him or others after death. would you follow him commiting sins like murder, theft, lying and rape? no if his name is george, but yes if mohammad.
@@redouan-nx5leyou're really showing off your massive vocabulary. loan loan loan loan.
They needed a distinct religion of their very own to die for. It didn’t have to be true or complete, just compelling enough to inspire warriors to go boldly into battle without fear of death.
Allahu akbar😅😅😅
Wonderfully put
@@PromiseEyen 💥
Exactly. Well said.
Over 1400, thousands of Islamic scholars are writing interpretations, commentaries, translations to explain a single book, but still its vague and debatable.
If Author failed to convey his message to his readers, it means he was stupid, fraud, ignorant and ill-informed.
maybe because it's a divine book that keeps on giving. a book of 500 pages has been studied for 1400 years and people are still finding new things. you don't understand it because you don't deserve to. you will only understand it when you beat your ego and realise that you are nothing and submit to allah only then does allah reach back and allow you to feel his presence
The god of Judaism, Christianity and Islam is EVIL and WICKED. Read the bible with UNDERSTANDING
@@btc-news Wow, you dare to judge is that allowed in your religion?
@@btc-news
Mental illness must be the reason people believe in fantasy like Islam
@@btc-news If you're a casual reader or a book critique who's just into ancient/old literature why would you submit to "Allah" just to read it? LMAO 😂
I tried reading the qu'ran once, honestly, it was like dragging my brain thro' a rough road.
The most accurate description
😂❤
Reading the Necronomicon inflicts less sanity damage than _trying_ to read the Quran. The associated gods (e.g. Cthulhu, Yog-Sothoth, Nyarlathotep, etc.) are less evil, too.
Were you dreaming.. 😅😂
Tell your audience why you are all the time deleting the replies of an academic @ranro7371..
You're just pushing a false impression on the Q..
I doubt if you are a 'doctor'... 😆🤣😋
@@ranro7371looking up the Aramaic word for God in the book of Daniel, I found it is Elohai not alaha as you claim.
You should know that allah is a female word, best translated as goddess and not god.
I'm reading the Quran in Hebrew, which is also a Semitic language, and it's a tiresome task. Every 3rd sentence is either a promise of rewards in the hereafter or a threat of hellfires. Sometimes it changes subject in almost in the middle of the verse.
I once heard a Muslim scholar say that in Islam, God has to have a no small degree of arbitrariness.
Same here. Know a bit of Arabic in both colonial influenced Arabic and Classical Arabic. Have no problem to search for Arabic dictionary while reading the Quran, the topics changed drastically like from “mountains are peg-leg like to prevent earthquakes” to “birds was made by Lah to divebomb demons” to “flying donkeys”. And I understand why many ex-muslims saying about the fear tactic in Quran for as you said every 3-5 sentences, there are promises to heaven and hell.
In every other verse it ends with a combination of these, "Allah is all wise, all knowing, all merciful". 😂😂 . It seem like Allah is a very prideful, narcissistic god 😂, sounds like Satan to me 🤔
Which is the last thing any god (theos or hotheos) with pretentions of wisdom or justice would have.
@@JKRuc
That actually follows the logic of Near Eastern pagan prayers, which were less talking to their gods than _magical incantations designed to manipulate the target God or demon into doing what the petitioner wanted._ In practice, this usually meant alleviating a perceived curse, because gods and demons were thought to be prone to violent mood swings and arbitrarily getting offended over potentially anything a mortal did. Whether it was trying to increase one's fortunes or appeasement to alleviate a curse, one of the key components was *flattery,* usually by invoking particular names or titles to a god/demon relevant to the desired outcome. The flattery didn't even necessarily have to mean anything either, as it was fundamentally sympathetic magic designed to butter up/prime the entity in question. Knowing the kinds of Baalite traditions that actually gave rise to Islam's Allah, all the claims of Allah's "mercy" at the ends of Islamic prayers sound not only disingenuous, *but take on the tone of **_tacit begging of a tyrant to spare them._* Which, sadly, fits Allah's M.O. to a T.
Edit: Also worth noting, this is why Yahweh instructed the Israelites _not to worship him with empty flattery and cajoling like the pagans did their gods._ Likewise, this is what is alluded to when Yahweh said you will not take His name in vain, as well as forbidding most forms of magic; both entail trying to *_manipulate God by magical means,_* and He most definitely won't tolerate that like some petty false god might.
@@JKRuc i know Muslims prayer in Arabic. “There’s no God but Allah. Allah is Almighty and Merciful. Allah knows best”
From the moment I entered this world, I was assigned the label of being a Muslim by those in power, leaving me with no say in the matter. However, as I reached the age of 15, I began to question the belief that had been imposed upon me. This state of confusion propelled me on a quest for truth. I delved into the depths of the Quran, reading it carefully, seven times, both in its original language and translated versions. It was through this journey that I ultimately decided to part ways with the religion. Since then, I have discovered a newfound happiness within myself. I have realised that I do not require a specific religious affiliation, for I believe that the essence of God resides within the depths of my heart.
Indeed, the Quran serves as a genuine source of guidance. It has led me to abandon this absurd religion and this is the only miracle I've found and witnessed.
Now you are missing Christ, read the Bible. Blessings, dear.
I’ve been having a discussion with a Muslim at my work. It went exactly how David said it would. “The Quran is Gods word solely bc of how amazing the writing is”. He is not interested in evidence or logical reasoning..... amazing.
Show him this:
Hamas, Al Queda, ISIS, Hazbulla, and so on have all 1 thing in common; Islam. I don't want to sound crazy but have you guys ever red the quran? There are passages in there where Mohammed calls for the killing of all Jews and that "the last hour" would not come until Muslims slaughter the Jews (Sahih Muslim 2922). And there's passages in there saying Muslims should not take Christians and Jews as friends because they are friends of eachother and Mohammed called Christians and Jews "unjust people" (Surah Al-Ma'idah - 51).
I am afraid these groups will not disappear until Islam disappears and people realize it's not a religion of peace but of war and terror, not all Muslims are bad people; some are Muslim by customs of the country they live in and family they have but never really read the quran and just try to live a good life.
The reason why Mohammed has this hatred against the Jews and Christians is because when Mohammed went to the Jews to prove to his followers he was a prophet (he said the Jews would confirm he was a prophet), the Jews send him packing and told him in his face he was wrong and not a prophet (and the Jews were right); that is where his hatred for Jews started. And likewise the Christians rejected Mohammed as a prophet, which caused his hatred for Christians. Islamists treat Mohammed like more than a prophet, they treat him like Messiah; Mohammed is a false prophet and false messiah leading many astray into hatred for one another even to the point of death.
All Israel is doing right now is self-defense, the land called Israel was never called Palestine and there was no Palestinian identity until the Muslims and Arabs made it up in the mid-late 1900's; it's a Islamic lie, because in Islam they are allowed to lie in war times; there has been war on and off since Israel's reestablishment and the aggressors are Islamic countries and Islamic terrorist groups funded by Islamic countries.
The land Israel; to who'm does it belong in the first place?
The Arabians Muslims, falsely identifying as Palestinians, argue it belongs to them but let's take a look at history and facts:
Before 1200 BC the land belonged to the Sea Peoples
In and after 1200 BC it belonged to Israelites
In 957 BC the Israelites build the first Temple
In 722 BC the Assyrians invade Israel and take over
In 586 BC the Babylonians invade the land and take over and causes the displacement of Israel
In 515 BC Israelites return to Israel and the second Temple is build
In 332 BC Alexander the great invades Israel and takes over
In 63 BC the Romans came and took over Israel but Israel was still considered a vassal State at that time
-
0 BC passing by the birth, life, death, resurrection and ascension of Jesus Christ of Nazareth we go into AD
-
In 70 AD the temple is destroyed
In 136 AD the Romans (ruled by Emperor Hadrian) named the area of modern Israel "Paleshtina" as an insult to the Jews after the Bar Kokhba revolt (because the Philistines were the enemy of ancient Israel).
In 343 AD the Christians take over the Roman empire, this was not a violent take over; it was by conversion
In 395 AD the Romans split
In 636 AD the Muslims invade, forcibly converting the Christians and Jews to Islam or killing them or enslaving them or running them off by force
In 1099 AD the Christians recapture Jerusalem and the surrounding areas, establishing the Crusader States
In 1291 AD the Mamluk Muslims invaded and took over the area, forcefully converting the Christians and Jews back to Islam
In 1517 AD the Ottoman empire invaded and conquered the region
In 1918 AD after World War I the Christians took back over the region, this was taken by England
In 1948 AD England "gives" the land back to the Jews and Israel is reestablished.
In 1948 AD it was not "given back" to the Jews exactly; there was a war following the 1947 UN partition plan, later, in 1948, following the declaration of the establishment of the State of Israel on May 14, 1948, Arabs launched a military intervention in what became the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, resulting in Israel gaining control of more land than allocated in the UN plan.
In present time, Israel owns the land and gave the Arabs who identify as "Palestinians" a piece of land called Gaza, in return Hamas (ruler of Gaza) sends Islamic terrorists to kill innocent civilians in Israel on October the 7th (just to name one example of the many examples) and declares Jihad; they want to take over Israel by force through murder, terrorism and destruction.
So who has the right to the land? Israel.
But let's give more facts and details:
- If we look into the Bible and the Torah it is clear it belongs to Israel (the Jews).
- Jews owned the land for 1411 years, the Muslims for 1090 years and the Christians for 515 years; so by years it belongs to the Jews.
- If the land belongs to the Natives of the land; the Natives of the land are Jews so it belongs to the Jews
- The "Philistines" are the ancient enemy of the Jewish people (which are not the Arabs that call themselves "Palestinians" today, and those people (the Philistines) are long gone from the world today)
- The Roman empire called the land "Paleshtina" as an insult as mentioned above and not "Palestine" actually, "Palestine" is just a misinterpreted of the word "Paleshtina"
- The matter of the fact is that "Palestine" and the "Palestinian people" are not more than a fiction, a fake, a propaganda made by the Arabs and Muslim world
- Israelis have no other country to go to, and this is the decisive truth that helped Israel win all its wars. Israelis have nowhere to go, therefore every war and every conflict is an existential threat to Israel. Muslims have about 50 countries, to live, go to, etc.
Facts, history and common sense says Israel belongs to the Jews and Islam is a threat to every human life; the Jew, the Christian and even the unbeliever.
muslims are only muslims cz of the absurdity of islam not despite it but bczzz of it actually; i'm an ex muslim myself and i know the feeling hhhh
Same, most of muslims i knew are well-behaved until i asked them something i read from the Quran. They change attitude. Later i found out that the thing they’ve been doing called “Taqiya” which is pretending they’re (muslims) friendly, hospitable towards non-muslims but disgust non-muslims. They’re basically taught to be liar.
the Quran reads like it was written by a mentally handicapped person
A happy cultist 😄
I find it so interesting that the God of the universe would choose a man who can’t read or write, and speaks classical Arabic as the language to write the book from heaven in. A language with no vowels where you can’t tell س apart from ش and ع from غand ص fromض and خ from ح and ج and ظ from ط because those consonantal markers didn't exist yet. Doesn’t that seem odd to you?
Rest easy friend. The "God of the universe" didn't give man the Qur'an, that Dark malignant, deceiving character did.
And, when copying in moonlight/starlight/candlelight/oil lamplight, could a dot/slash etc., be distinguished from a blemish in the parchment?
No about knowing how to read or write.
It's about Allah that Muslims claim to be a Creator of all things but Allah didn't know Muhammed was unable to read.
So Allah doesn't know his creation.
Kind of a poor argument seeing as the Torah was written in ancient Hebrew before vowel markings as well.
@@AliciaGuitarthe Jews in this time can still read and write the languages they used over 2000y ago
David, do you know what they tell us, the native Arabic speakers, in similar situations?:
"You don’t understand Quran the way Ulama (scholars) do"
"You need to have spent all of your life studying Islam to fully understand Quran"
"If what you are saying applied, then would Islam have survived 1500 years and been followed by billions of people?"
I swear I am not making this stuff up 😂
Wow, that's very interesting, very much confirms what David is saying here, thank you.
Exactly. Fallacies, all of them.
Yes,, yes they would follow blindly because of your barbaric ways of torture and death for the slightest infraction. Who would dare say anything different? Are you too thick in the skull to understand that?
ALL three statements involve systematic indoctrination,
which
one expects in a Cult.
This is what centuries of inbreeding and punishing believers for _thinking_ does to people.
Writing a religion in a language with unwritten yet highly important voweling is wild
Writing a religion is wild, that makes it prone to mistranslation, misinterpretation, ambiguity, and corruption, as both the Quran and Bible suffer from.
Most religions 😂
The Quran is specifically written with voweling. It is the only arabic text to be written that way
@@Cazadin not for the first hundred years
I am an Arabic speaker (my mother tongue) and can assert every thing mentioned in this video. Quran is a mess, the interpretation of almost every single verse starts with (and the interpreters disagree on what Allah meant by that). If you read the whole different interpretations, you would come to the conclusion that these verses don't mean anything. Even if the verse is understandable, you get nothing out of it. The most incoherent meaningless Arabic book ever written.
Almost 60% to 70% of it is just fluff about how great their god is. Just cut to the chase already, haha
@@euengelion- it’s nothing but a book full of a sock 🧦 puppet’s insecurities.
I can only read English.. I have read portions of the Quran and it jumps all over the place. No context given. I found it highly underwhelming
You are lier, just because you became apostate you said that
@@ranro7371 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
There are already three languages waaaayyy older than Arabic off just the top of my history lessons.
So… your very 1st premise is crumbling like a flimsy house of cards!!!
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Your compassion for Muslims is incredible. For decades you - a highly intelligent person who could have devoted his life to much more beautiful and interesting topics - have now been studying the Koran in order to protect them from one of Satan's greatest lies. I hope our Muslim brothers and sisters will eventually recognize and appreciate it, and above all, finally turn their backs on this unbearable nonsense. Thank you for your tireless efforts. God bless you and your loved ones.
Most Muslims will never see or acknowledge the truth. They will be the right hand of the Beast, and enjoy every minute of it. Well, until they are turned into walking dead men, torn apart by birds.
What utter drivel. Arabic is the oldest continually spoken language in world. Back when English didn’t even have a script resembled German more than any entire encyclopedia were written in Arabic.
@@ranro7371 how very peculiar to see muslims/islam trying to re-write history...simultaniously claiming "facts" w/o proof
@@ranro7371 Mohammed was a peddo. If your god anoints a peddo for his final revelation you are following idiocy.
@@ranro7371 _Here is a factual statement. The Arabic language is the original from which developed off the Aramaic and "Semetic" langauges._
Except the Old Testament of the Bible is written in Hebrew, not Aramaic which makes your comment irrelevant since the Bible is in Hebrew, not Aramaic, two different languages. And Arabic is not the original language, that's historically false.
Just finished Seeking Allah finding Jesus and I am more christian than ever. Thanks god for sending you to Nabeel so that he could create one of the greatest books i’ve ever read!
I had seen Nabeel's book at a Christian Life Book Store (in north Texas), and bought it; enjoyed it immensely too. Praise be to our Father for leading Nabeel to His Son Jesus!!!
You should read the sumerian tablets and see where christianity was copied from.
@@Enscriptiv you read cuneiform?
It’s pretty interesting how he died from stomach cancer after his conversion when the punishment in Islam for backbiting is painful death and permanent hell
@@Expiredbeefsteak is that why your false prophet died a slow and painful death from the hands of a Jewish lady, allah couldn't protect your false prophet from poison. what a powerless god.
Thank you, David. You have answered my 50 year old question why the Quran is written in Arabic. When I was kid, I saw my Malay neighbours reciting the Quran and I think they don't understand the scriptures but regurgitate the recitation.
It's the melody and rhythm. We see this as an effective memorization tool, passed down verbally and not require literacy. Clever exploit that seems to bypass critical thinking.
So if I follow this logic: as a German I could become a Muslim, then I can live as I want, as Allah didn’t send a messenger in German to reveal his truth. So I have an excuse on judgement day …🤪
I’m glad that Jesus is the messiah for the Jews and gentiles! Thank you Jesus.
you guys were under the Roman empire when Jesus was around. The Anglo, the Portoguese, Germanic, Jews etc. So by this logic you all should naturally follow Christianity or Judaism based on which community you were closer to. If Asterix and Obelix serves as a work of literature, it shows the relationship between the Romans and the Gauls etc. etc.
@@mimimercado762Germany was never Roman
😂😂😂
@@Hedgehogz856
In ancient times, the region now known as Germany was partially under Roman control. It wasn’t fully occupied by the Romans and was not a unified country, rather a collection of various smaller kingdoms, but the land was still under Roman control.
@@Marco_My_Wordsit was not the border was the Rhine river wich may be modern Germany but the Germanic tribes that were originally there were killed or retreated across the Rhine the Germanic people never were subjugated they fought to hard the celts in modern day england were defeated though
This is some of the best apologetics I've ever seen/heard. Absolutely amazing and a great service to all people regardless of faith.
Surah Al-Nisaa Aya - 46 Addresses people like those in the video who take verses from the Quran out of their context. The examples cited are misrepresented, of the verses he cites:
Surah Al-Sajdah, Surah 32 which he begins with it starts with addressing all of mankind
Surah Al-Nahl, Surah 16 in the verse he is citing it is again addressing all of mankind, saying that Islam is the truth, addressing those who worship tyrant/leaders,
Surah Ya-Sin, the 34th surah Aya 1-16 is deliberatley misinterpeted to have been referring to Arabs, when infact it is addressing all of those who know about or heard the Quran, the same is true for literally every verse he cites, go to his citation and read the preceding verses to see for yourself, every single point raised here is addressed in the Qur'an itself. In addition from Surahs he does not cite:
Surah Al-Ma'idah Aya - 48 shows that the Quran supersedes all other revelations
Surah Aal-Imraan Aya 96 - Addresses all of mankind
Surah Al-Baqarah Aya 1-7, The first Surah after the
opening has all the point addressed and example of people like him rebuked
Surah Al-Hujurat Aya 13 - Addresses the creation of humanity into different peoples
Surah Al-A'raaf Aya 171 to 178, - Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge
Surah Al-Jumu'a Aya 1 to 8 Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge
Surah Al-Anbiya 107 - The role of the prophet
The Aramaic word for God is "Alaha". It's the word Isa PBUH used. Sounds familiar? Written without the confusing vowels it is written A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), reduced from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum) it is written in the Arabic script 'A-L-L-H' (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha) add an A before the last H for vocalization.
The word God in another rendition in Hebrew ʾĕlōah is derived from a base ʾilāh, an Arabic word, written without confusing vowel it is A-L-H in the Arabic script, pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elaha. Infact both are written written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic and not A because it is an Alef with hamza below (إ أ )
They are two different forms of Alef. And it mean "a god", it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا)
Jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J. The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes as will be explained. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one.
Schlözer in his preparation for the Arabia expedition in 1781 coined the term Semitic language:
"From the Mediterranean to the Euphrates, from Mesopotamia to Arabia ruled one language, as is well known. Thus Syrians, Babylonians, Hebrews, and Arabs were one people (ein Volk). Phoenicians (Hamites) also spoke this language, which I would like to call the Semitic (die Semitische)." -Before Boas: The Genesis of Ethnography and Ethnology in the German By Han F. Vermeulen. He was only half right though, Arabic is the only corollary to "proto-semitic", infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical as will be shown.
"Semitic" is just mumbled Arabic, really. Imagine English with a third of its letters removed and simplified grammar. That's Aramaic, Hebrew, etc. For example, combine T and D into just T; there's no need to have 2 letters. The same goes for i, e, y - they should all be just y from now on, etc., etc. Arabic is the only corollary to proto-Semitic. In fact, the whole classification of Semitic languages is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning brain. Hebrew, Aramaic, and the rest of these made-up dialect continua only have 22 letters out of the 29 proto-Semitic letters. Arabic has all 29. The difference between Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as the difference between Latin and pig Latin or Italian. "Phoenician" is an Arabic dialect continuum, and not only that, it is pidgin. It is simplified to the point of stupidity. Anyone with a basic knowledge of Arabic would see this clearly. What happened was that Arabic handicapped "scholars" saw the equivalent of Scottish Twitter spelling, with added mumbling due to phonemic mergers (22 letters, not 29), and mistakenly thought they were seeing a different language."
"protosemetic" Alphabet (29), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22)
𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼
ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي
A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y
א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת
Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic:
ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain
س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining
ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining
ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining
ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining
ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining
protoS 29th is a س written in a different position, but was shoehorned to obfuscate.
This kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua. As a matter of fact, all of the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and their complexity was derived from the Qur'an. It was by analyzing the syntactic structure of the Qur'an that the Arabic root system was developed. This system was first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, which preceded the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years. It was through this development that the concept of Arabic roots was established and later co-opted into the term 'semitic root,' allowing the decipherment of ancient scripts. In essence, they quite literally copied and pasted the entirety of the Arabic root. Hebrew had been dead, as well as all the other dialects of Arabic, until being 'revived' in a Frankensteinian fashion in the 18th and 19th centuries. The entire region spoke basically the same language, with mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language gradually became more degenerate, and then the Qur'an appeared with the oldest possible form of the language thousands of years later. This is why the Arabs of that time were challenged to produce 10 similar verses, and they couldn't. People think it's a miracle because they couldn't do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself. They had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision. And when I say mathematical, I quite literally mean mathematical.
Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken?
The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study.real
God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
@@mznxbcv12345 well said my friend ,appreciate it so much 👍
There are even spelling mistakes in the Quran! They kept them because they didn't want to correct the word of Allah 😂.
I'm happy there are translators around the world, across all countries, working hard to make Bible accessible to every culture and languages. Because the same cannot be said for Quran.
Why didn't God provide the translations himself? He could've avoided any confusion, and spread his message quicker, thus avoiding unnecessary wars.
@@garyphisher7375God didn't write the bible, so God can't provide translation. But Allah wrote the quran through a single prophet.
@@destinyglorious5637 You need to add Alllah AKA Mhmd!
@@destinyglorious5637 Q: Why is it that anytime Allah's forces come against Israel, with overwhelming forces, Israel wins ???
@@studygodsword5937coz Christians jews satan and illuminati band together to fight a small number of the 1 and only true religion forces
We were able to attend Nabeel Quereshis funeral back in 2016. Praise God for saving him from the lie of Muhammed
If a language can be learned, then a language can be translated.
You should’ve said “if a book can be read then a book can be translated” 😂
@@LeniPeni That works too. But when we read the q🕳️u🕳️r🕳️a🕳️n and point out the nonsense in it, they demand we learn arabic. It’s more than the reading that I was calling out.
@@EricDG326 I meant that it’s incredibly hard to understand even if you’re an expert in the language like David said. So it can’t be read and that’s why it can’t even be translated
Exactly brother
The examples cited are misrepresented, indeed that very misrepresentation is answered in the same Surahs of the verses he cites:
Surah Al-Sajdah, Surah 32, which he begins with it starts with addressing all of mankind.
Surah Al-Nahl, Surah 16, in the verse he is citing it is again addressing all of mankind, saying that Islam is the truth, addressing those who worship tyrant/leaders.
Surah Yasin, Surah 34, Aya 1-16 is deliberatley misinterpeted to have been referring to Arabs, when infact it is addressing all of those who know about or heard the Qura.
The same is true for literally every verse he cites, go to his citation and read the preceding verses to see for yourself, every single point raised here is addressed in the Qur'an itself.
In addition from Surahs he does not cite:
Surah Al-Baqarah Aya 1-7 The first Surah after the opening has all the point addressed and example of people like him rebuked
Surah Al-A'raaf Aya 171 to 178 - Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge
Surah Al-Nisaa Aya 46 - Addresses people like those in the video who take verses from the Quran out of their context
Surah Al-Ma'idah Aya 48 - shows that the Quran supersedes all other revelations
Surah Aal-Imraan Aya 96 - Addresses all of mankind
Surah Al-Anbiya Aya 107 - The role of the prophet
Surah Al-Hujurat Aya 13 - Addresses the creation of humanity into different peoples
Surah Al-Jumu'a Aya 1 to 8 Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge
The Aramaic word for God is Alaha. It's the word Isa PBUH (Jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J). Sounds familiar? Written without the confusing vowels, it is A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), adducted from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum) 'A-L-L-H' (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha).
The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes as aforementioned. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one. In addition,The word God in another rendition in Hebrew ʾĕlōah is derived from a base ʾilāh, an Arabic word, written without confusing vowel it is A-L-H in the Arabic script, pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elaha. Infact both are written written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic and not A because it is an Alef with hamza below (إ أ ) They are two different forms of Alef. And it mean "a god", it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا), but this kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua.
infact "YHWH" itself is an Arabic word as discussed by Professor. Israel Knohl (Professor of Biblical studies at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem) in the paper" YHWH: The Original Arabic Meaning of the Name."
"protosemetic" Alphabet (29), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22)
𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼
ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي
A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y
א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת
Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic:
ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain
س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining
ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining
ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining
ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining
ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining
The reason why the protoS alphabet here is 28 and not 29, is because the supposed extra letter is simply a س written in a different position, but it was shoehorned to obfuscated. In Arabic letter shapes are different depending on whether they are in the beginning , middle or end of a word.
This kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua. As a matter of fact, all of the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and their complexity was derived from the Qur'an. It was by analyzing the syntactic structure of the Qur'an that the Arabic root system was developed. This system was first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, which preceded the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years. It was through this development that the concept of Arabic roots was established and later co-opted into the term 'semitic root,' allowing the decipherment of ancient scripts. In essence, they quite literally copied and pasted the entirety of the Arabic root. Hebrew had been dead, as well as all the other dialects of Arabic, until being 'revived' in a Frankensteinian fashion in the 18th and 19th centuries. The entire region spoke basically the same language, with mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language gradually became more degenerate, and then the Qur'an appeared with the oldest possible form of the language thousands of years later. This is why the Arabs of that time were challenged to produce 10 similar verses, and they couldn't. People think it's a miracle because they couldn't do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself. They had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision. And when I say mathematical, I quite literally mean mathematical. Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken? The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study.real
God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
I actually tried to read it one time. It seemed to me as if the pages had been scattered and randomly reassembled.
They kind of were. The typical layout is shortest chapter to longest, not chronological order or any sort of logic.
Dear brother Dr. David, my mother language is ARABIC, and I am near 70 years of Age I have studied Arabic and I master it more than 99% of the Arabic speaking people, and I am also multi-lingual (Three perfect languages and two more so so) So my testimony must be valid, Arabic is one of the most pathetic languages in the universe, Why? Because 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, Should I go further? OK here we go. Arabic started to develop about 17 centuries ago. For it to be useful, it had to depend on so many languages around the area it started, such as Assyrian, Aramaic, Pehlevi Abyssinian, Greek, Latin, Armenian and so and so forth, (Some experts stated that it comprises of 66 identified languages, Dr. Christof Lexenberg). On the other hand, the Quran is untranslatable, why? because to translate any piece, one MUST understand it first, then you can translate. The most common comment of the interpreters and commentators of the Islamic scholars is That they are in dispute with each other, and they are NEVER in agreement almost of any phrase, sentence or idea.
Back to the subject, Arabic, it has been anchored in the ground by its neck only due to the Quran which froze it and kept it undevelopable.
I invite you and all, (only if you speak Arabic - unfortunately) to see how polemics and apologetics who speak Arabic silence the Dawah people concerning the Quran and the language.
Off topic, Dr. Taha Houssain the Egyptian blind Dean of the Arabic literature in Egypt until he was fired from the educational ministry of Egypt around 1955, He wrote a book explaining that the Arabic poetry was composed on during the 9th and on centuries AD for the purpose of supporting the newly composed Quran (then) (The book’s name is Alsheir Aljahely - i.e., the pre Islamic era Poetry) He also stated that if he wishes, he can compose a much better Quran and more understandable.
Dear Dr. David, I can go on and on for hours and days explaining these issues mostly from their own books and their own scholars and even from the Quran itself.
God bless you and your family
Praise God!!!
🤣🤣 I smell the grudge of the minorities of the Middle East in your comment
Any advice on learning Arabic?
@@muhammadsair3598 of course, what else would you say? instead of addressing the subject directly you take the Islamic approach of personal attacks. Thank you and God bless you. (Between you and me, No dear Sir I have no grudges, as a former WAFA translator in the early 2000, and reading the reports directly from the field, I got so sick and got diabetes which still with me until now. WAFA is the Palestinian News Agency, I got sick due to my emotional involvements with what humanly happened Palestinians, I have dozens of stories that give me nightmares, but to be honest, one has to be honest)
I believe that there are videos and college progtams to do so.@@danielcarlsen8975
Allah is such a caged god.
He cannot have omnipresence, as such he's restricted to heaven, he cannot sit on his own throne, so he hovers over it in a way that can't be explained. He doesn't understand any languages besides Arabic. Muslims gather 5 times a day to command that Allah should pray for Muhammed.
It's fascinating just how restricted their god is.
Does the 11th dimension require your imagination to envision how life forms might function there?
Surah Al-Nisaa Aya - 46 Addresses people like those in the video who take verses from the Quran out of their context. The examples cited are misrepresented, of the verses he cites:
Surah Al-Sajdah, Surah 32 which he begins with it starts with addressing all of mankind
Surah Al-Nahl, Surah 16 in the verse he is citing it is again addressing all of mankind, saying that Islam is the truth, addressing those who worship tyrant/leaders,
Surah Ya-Sin, the 34th surah Aya 1-16 is deliberatley misinterpeted to have been referring to Arabs, when infact it is addressing all of those who know about or heard the Quran, the same is true for literally every verse he cites, go to his citation and read the preceding verses to see for yourself, every single point raised here is addressed in the Qur'an itself. In addition from Surahs he does not cite:
Surah Al-Ma'idah Aya - 48 shows that the Quran supersedes all other revelations
Surah Aal-Imraan Aya 96 - Addresses all of mankind
Surah Al-Baqarah Aya 1-7, The first Surah after the
opening has all the point addressed and example of people like him rebuked
Surah Al-Hujurat Aya 13 - Addresses the creation of humanity into different peoples
Surah Al-A'raaf Aya 171 to 178, - Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge
Surah Al-Jumu'a Aya 1 to 8 Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge
Surah Al-Anbiya 107 - The role of the prophet
The Aramaic word for God is "Alaha". It's the word Isa PBUH used. Sounds familiar? Written without the confusing vowels it is written A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), reduced from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum) it is written in the Arabic script 'A-L-L-H' (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha) add an A before the last H for vocalization.
The word God in another rendition in Hebrew ʾĕlōah is derived from a base ʾilāh, an Arabic word, written without confusing vowel it is A-L-H in the Arabic script, pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elaha. Infact both are written written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic and not A because it is an Alef with hamza below (إ أ )
They are two different forms of Alef. And it mean "a god", it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا)
Jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J. The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes as will be explained. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one.
Schlözer in his preparation for the Arabia expedition in 1781 coined the term Semitic language:
"From the Mediterranean to the Euphrates, from Mesopotamia to Arabia ruled one language, as is well known. Thus Syrians, Babylonians, Hebrews, and Arabs were one people (ein Volk). Phoenicians (Hamites) also spoke this language, which I would like to call the Semitic (die Semitische)." -Before Boas: The Genesis of Ethnography and Ethnology in the German By Han F. Vermeulen. He was only half right though, Arabic is the only corollary to "proto-semitic", infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical as will be shown.
"Semitic" is just mumbled Arabic, really. Imagine English with a third of its letters removed and simplified grammar. That's Aramaic, Hebrew, etc. For example, combine T and D into just T; there's no need to have 2 letters. The same goes for i, e, y - they should all be just y from now on, etc., etc. Arabic is the only corollary to proto-Semitic. In fact, the whole classification of Semitic languages is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning brain. Hebrew, Aramaic, and the rest of these made-up dialect continua only have 22 letters out of the 29 proto-Semitic letters. Arabic has all 29. The difference between Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as the difference between Latin and pig Latin or Italian. "Phoenician" is an Arabic dialect continuum, and not only that, it is pidgin. It is simplified to the point of stupidity. Anyone with a basic knowledge of Arabic would see this clearly. What happened was that Arabic handicapped "scholars" saw the equivalent of Scottish Twitter spelling, with added mumbling due to phonemic mergers (22 letters, not 29), and mistakenly thought they were seeing a different language."
"protosemetic" Alphabet (29), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22)
𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼
ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي
A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y
א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת
Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic:
ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain
س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining
ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining
ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining
ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining
ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining
protoS 29th is a س written in a different position, but was shoehorned to obfuscate.
This kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua. As a matter of fact, all of the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and their complexity was derived from the Qur'an. It was by analyzing the syntactic structure of the Qur'an that the Arabic root system was developed. This system was first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, which preceded the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years. It was through this development that the concept of Arabic roots was established and later co-opted into the term 'semitic root,' allowing the decipherment of ancient scripts. In essence, they quite literally copied and pasted the entirety of the Arabic root. Hebrew had been dead, as well as all the other dialects of Arabic, until being 'revived' in a Frankensteinian fashion in the 18th and 19th centuries. The entire region spoke basically the same language, with mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language gradually became more degenerate, and then the Qur'an appeared with the oldest possible form of the language thousands of years later. This is why the Arabs of that time were challenged to produce 10 similar verses, and they couldn't. People think it's a miracle because they couldn't do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself. They had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision. And when I say mathematical, I quite literally mean mathematical.
Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken?
The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study.real
God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
@@Mohammadali-dv6kb Aulloh is a god, we have no doubt about that.
But is he THE one true God? There's no evidence for that claim.
What's your evidence that aulloh is the one true God?
He calls himself God and borrows names from judeo-christian theology doesn't automatically make him God.
The Jews have the miracles of Moses against the gods of Egypt. The Christians have the resurrection of Jesus which conquered death forever.
Show us your evidence that aulloh is the true God.
When r@@Mohammadali-dv6kbwhen everything in the quoran is forever misinterpreted or quoted out of context, then the religion is not meant for mankind, not even for the so called Dawah who never agree on it's meanings.
To me it is meant to pretend to teach a doctrine with political end.
5:55... LOLOL! I am one of the idiots who actually did spend 4-5 years studying Arabic so that I could read the "final revelation" in the original language on my own. When I finally got to it (still mostly needed a side-by-side English-Arabic copy to understand fully), I literally wanted to barf while barely into it. But I kept going, getting more and more nauseated as I went. I wanted to finish the book in its entirety, just to be sure I had given it every chance imaginable and that I hadn't missed out on the single tiniest "gem". Glad I did it. I can now say with supreme confidence that it is absolutely, indubitably the WORST book I have ever read. Yeah, sure, the recitation is cool. Just like Gregorian or medieval chants or even Latin mass, or classical guitar or piano. But the book itself requires keeping a barf bag handy. And I remained a Christian.
@@ranro7371 That's all very interesting information. I have extensively studied several languages from four different linguistic families, so I find all this fascinating. But, what does that have to do with the message contained in the Quran?
@@ranro7371 You just wasted A LOT OF TIME copying/pasting useless information. No one cares about a book wriiten in a language spoken by less than 2% of the world.
The fact remains, the quran is a literary garbabe pile, full of scientific, historic and grammatical errors; disorganized and self-contradictory.
*Dr. Seuss wrote better that "allah" (a.k.a., Muhammed) did* .
The recitation stinks, too. If there's a collection of sounds that by themselves have the power to send a soul to hell, it's the Arabic language. Which I (regrettably) can speak, in a fashion, after having lived in the middle east for a time.
@@ranro7371Hebrew is older than Arabic. Your religion is about 600 years far later than when the Bible got canonised.
The examples cited are misrepresented, of the verses he cites:
Surah Al-Sajdah, Surah 32 which he begins with it starts with addressing all of mankind
Surah Al-Nahl, Surah 16 in the verse he is citing it is again addressing all of mankind, saying that Islam is the truth, addressing those who worship tyrant/leaders,
Surah Ya-Sin, the 34th surah Aya 1-16 is deliberatley misinterpeted to have been referring to Arabs, when infact it is addressing all of those who know about or heard the Quran, the same is true for literally every verse he cites, go to his citation and read the preceding verses to see for yourself, every single point raised here is addressed in the Qur'an itself.
In addition from Surahs he does not cite:
Surah Al-Ma'idah Aya - 48 shows that the Quran supersedes all other revelations
Surah Al-Nisaa Aya - 46 Addresses people like those in the video who take verses from the Quran out of their context
Surah Aal-Imraan Aya 96 - Addresses all of mankind
Surah Al-Baqarah Aya 1-7, The first Surah after the
opening has all the point addressed and example of people like him rebuked
Surah Al-Hujurat Aya 13 - Addresses the creation of humanity into different peoples
Surah Al-A'raaf Aya 171 to 178, - Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge
Surah Al-Jumu'a Aya 1 to 8 Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge
Surah Al-Anbiya 107 - The role of the prophet
The Aramaic word for God is Alaha. It's the word Isa PBUH (Jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J). Sounds familiar? Written without the confusing vowels, it is A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), adducted from the Arabic original of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum of A-L-L-H (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha).
Language; When you look at the actual linguistics, you'll find that many were puzzled by the opposite, that is, how the other "semetic" (why in quotes will be revealed later) languages were more "evolved" than Arabic, while Arabic had archaic features, not only archaic compared to bibilical Hebrew, Ethiopic, "Aramaic" contemporary "semetic" languages, but even archaic compared to languages from ancient antiquity; Ugaritic, Akkadain. What is meant here by Archaic is not what most readers think, it is Archaic not in the sense that it is simple, but rather that it is complex (think Latin to pig Latin or Italian or Old English, which had genders and case endings to modern English), not only grammatically, but also phonetically; All the so called semitic languages are supposed to have evolved from protosemetic, the Alphabet for protosemitic is that of the so called Ancient South Arabian (which interestingly corresponds with the traditional Arabic origins account) and has 28 Phonemes. Arabic has 28 phonemes. Hebrew has 22, same as Aramaic, and other "semitic" languages. Now pause for a second and think about it, how come Arabic, a language that is supposed to have come so late has the same number of letters as a language that supposedly predates it by over a millennium (Musnad script ~1300 BCE). Not only is the glossary of phonemes more diverse than any other semitic language, but the grammar is more complex, containing more cases and retains what's linguists noted for its antiquity, broken plurals. Indeed, a linguist has once noted that if one were to take everything we know about languages and how they develop, Arabic is older than Akkadian (~2500 BCE).
|Classical Arabic | 28 consonants, 29 with Hamza and 6 vowels; some consonants are emphatic or pharyngealized; some vowels are marked with diacritics | Complex system of word formation based on roots and patterns; roots are sequences of consonants that carry the basic meaning of a word; patterns are sequences of vowels and affixes that modify the meaning and function of a word | Flexible word order, but VSO is most common; SVO is also possible; subject and object are marked by case endings (-u for nominative, -a for accusative, -i for genitive); verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different moods and aspects |
| Akkadian | 22 consonants and 3 vowels; some consonants are glottalized or palatalized; vowels are not marked | Similar system, but with different roots and patterns; some roots have more than three consonants; some patterns have infixes or reduplication | Fixed word order of SVO; subject and object are not marked by case endings, but by prepositions or word order; verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different tenses and aspects |
| Aramaic | 22 consonants and 3 vowels (later variants have more); no emphatic or pharyngealized consonants (except in some dialects); vowels are not marked (except in later variants such as Syriac) | Simple system of word formation based on prefixes and suffixes; some roots or patterns exist, but are less productive than in Arabic or Akkadian |
Matter of fact that all this, and the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and the complexity all of it was derived from the Qur'an, it was by analysing the syntactic structure of the Quran that the Arabic root system was developed, first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, preceding the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years, that the concept of Arabic root was developed and later co-opted into "semitic root" that the ancient scripts were deciphered, they quite literally copy pasted the entirey of Arabic root. hebrew had been dead, and so were all the other dialects of Arabic until being "revived" in a frankensteinian fashion in the 18th, 19th centuries. The whole region spoke basically the same language, mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language became more degenerate and then the Quran appears with the oldest form possible of the language thousands of years later It is why the Arabs back then were challenged to produce 10 verses similar, and they couldnt. People think it's a miracle becau'e they couldnt do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself, they had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision behind it. And I quite literally mean, mathematical.
Arabic is the only corollary to proto-semitic, infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning mass between their ears. hebrew, aramaic, rest of madeup dialect continua only have 22 letters of the 29 protosemitic letters Arabic has all 29. The difference betweeen Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as that between Latin and pig latin or italian.
"Semitic" is just mumbled Arabic, really. Imagine English with a third of its letters removed and simplified grammar. That's Aramaic, Hebrew, etc. For example, combine T and D into just T; there's no need to have 2 letters. The same goes for i, e, y - they should all be just y from now on, etc., etc. Arabic is the only corollary to proto-Semitic. In fact, the whole classification of Semitic languages is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning brain. Hebrew, Aramaic, and the rest of these made-up dialect continua only have 22 letters out of the 29 proto-Semitic letters. Arabic has all 29. The difference between Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as the difference between Latin and pig Latin or Italian. "Phoenician" is an Arabic dialect continuum, and not only that, it is pidgin. It is simplified to the point of stupidity. Anyone with a basic knowledge of Arabic would see this clearly. What happened was that Arabic handicapped "scholars" saw the equivalent of Scottish Twitter spelling, with added mumbling due to phonemic mergers (22 letters, not 29), and mistakenly thought they were seeing a different language.
Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of yeara later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before and in the highest form the language had ever taken and the language is lexically, syntactically, phonemically and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing, infact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it, and not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book that in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take, so high infact it is theoretically not possible to surpass it all in a script that had never been recorded before and so the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began and age of reason and rationality was born from its study
David I am going to memorize some verses! You are hilarious and I really appreciate your dry sense of humor.
Yeah, my dad is a (Christian) literature professor. He read a translation of the Koran and was NOT impressed with its literary value 😂. On the other hand, he's pointed out to me the literary beauty of the Bible, especially the Psalms.
beauty can be found in many books,,many are just fiction ,as in all religious books,,gods are a delusion
The examples cited are misrepresented, indeed that very misrepresentation is answered in the same Surahs of the verses he cites:
Surah Al-Sajdah, Surah 32, which he begins with it starts with addressing all of mankind.
Surah Al-Nahl, Surah 16, in the verse he is citing it is again addressing all of mankind, saying that Islam is the truth, addressing those who worship tyrant/leaders.
Surah Yasin, Surah 34, Aya 1-16 is deliberatley misinterpeted to have been referring to Arabs, when infact it is addressing all of those who know about or heard the Qura.
The same is true for literally every verse he cites, go to his citation and read the preceding verses to see for yourself, every single point raised here is addressed in the Qur'an itself.
In addition from Surahs he does not cite:
Surah Al-Baqarah Aya 1-7 The first Surah after the opening has all the point addressed and example of people like him rebuked
Surah Al-A'raaf Aya 171 to 178 - Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge
Surah Al-Nisaa Aya 46 - Addresses people like those in the video who take verses from the Quran out of their context
Surah Al-Ma'idah Aya 48 - shows that the Quran supersedes all other revelations
Surah Aal-Imraan Aya 96 - Addresses all of mankind
Surah Al-Anbiya Aya 107 - The role of the prophet
Surah Al-Hujurat Aya 13 - Addresses the creation of humanity into different peoples
Surah Al-Jumu'a Aya 1 to 8 Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge
The Aramaic word for God is Alaha. It's the word Isa PBUH (Jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J). Sounds familiar? Written without the confusing vowels, it is A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), adducted from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum) 'A-L-L-H' (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha).
The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes as aforementioned. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one. In addition, The word God in hebrew is eloah, is a cognate of the Arabic I-L-H, pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it into eloh, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elah. Infact it is written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic cause it is an Alef with hamza below (إ أ ) They are two different forms of Alef. And it mean "a god", it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا)
"protosemetic" Alphabet (29), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22)
𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼
ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي
A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y
א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת
Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic:
ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain
س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining
ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining
ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining
ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining
ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining
The reason why the protoS alphabet here is 28 and not 29, is because the supposed extra letter is simply a س written in a different position, but it was shoehorned to obfuscated. In Arabic letter shapes are different depending on whether they are in the beginning , middle or end of a word.
This kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua. As a matter of fact, all of the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and their complexity was derived from the Qur'an. It was by analyzing the syntactic structure of the Qur'an that the Arabic root system was developed. This system was first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, which preceded the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years. It was through this development that the concept of Arabic roots was established and later co-opted into the term 'semitic root,' allowing the decipherment of ancient scripts. In essence, they quite literally copied and pasted the entirety of the Arabic root. Hebrew had been dead, as well as all the other dialects of Arabic, until being 'revived' in a Frankensteinian fashion in the 18th and 19th centuries. The entire region spoke basically the same language, with mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language gradually became more degenerate, and then the Qur'an appeared with the oldest possible form of the language thousands of years later. This is why the Arabs of that time were challenged to produce 10 similar verses, and they couldn't. People think it's a miracle because they couldn't do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself. They had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision. And when I say mathematical, I quite literally mean mathematical. Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken? The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study.real
" .... older than the oldest recorded writing." Absolute rubbish.
Part 2
Language; When you look at the actual linguistics, you'll find that many were puzzled by the opposite, that is, how the other "semetic" (why in quotes will be revealed later) languages were more "evolved" than Arabic, while Arabic had archaic features, not only archaic compared to bibilical Hebrew, Ethiopic, "Aramaic" contemporary "semetic" languages, but even archaic compared to languages from ancient antiquity; Ugaritic, Akkadain. What is meant here by Archaic is not what most readers think, it is Archaic not in the sense that it is simple, but rather that it is complex (think Latin to pig Latin or Italian or Old English, which had genders and case endings to modern English), not only grammatically, but also phonetically; All the so called semitic languages are supposed to have evolved from protosemetic, the Alphabet for protosemitic is that of the so called Ancient South Arabian (which interestingly corresponds with the traditional Arabic origins account) and has 28 Phonemes. Arabic has 28 phonemes. Hebrew has 22, same as Aramaic, and other "semitic" languages. Now pause for a second and think about it, how come Arabic, a language that is supposed to have come so late has the same number of letters as a language that supposedly predates it by over a millennium (Musnad script ~1300 BCE). Not only is the glossary of phonemes more diverse than any other semitic language, but the grammar is more complex, containing more cases and retains what's linguists noted for its antiquity, broken plurals. Indeed, a linguist has once noted that if one were to take everything we know about languages and how they develop, Arabic is older than Akkadian (~2500 BCE).
|Classical Arabic | 28 consonants, 29 with Hamza and 6 vowels; some consonants are emphatic or pharyngealized; some vowels are marked with diacritics | Complex system of word formation based on roots and patterns; roots are sequences of consonants that carry the basic meaning of a word; patterns are sequences of vowels and affixes that modify the meaning and function of a word | Flexible word order, but VSO is most common; SVO is also possible; subject and object are marked by case endings (-u for nominative, -a for accusative, -i for genitive); verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different moods and aspects |
| Akkadian | 22 consonants and 3 vowels; some consonants are glottalized or palatalized; vowels are not marked | Similar system, but with different roots and patterns; some roots have more than three consonants; some patterns have infixes or reduplication | Fixed word order of SVO; subject and object are not marked by case endings, but by prepositions or word order; verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different tenses and aspects |
| Aramaic | 22 consonants and 3 vowels (later variants have more); no emphatic or pharyngealized consonants (except in some dialects); vowels are not marked (except in later variants such as Syriac) | Simple system of word formation based on prefixes and suffixes; some roots or patterns exist, but are less productive than in Arabic or Akkadian |
Arabic is the only corollary to proto-semitic, infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning mass between their ears. hebrew, aramaic, rest of madeup dialect continua only have 22 letters of the 29 protosemitic letters Arabic has all 29. The difference betweeen Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as that between Latin and pig latin or italian.
"Semitic" is just mumbled Arabic, really. Imagine English with a third of its letters removed and simplified grammar. That's Aramaic, Hebrew, etc. For example, combine T and D into just T; there's no need to have 2 letters. The same goes for i, e, y - they should all be just y from now on, etc., etc. Arabic is the only corollary to proto-Semitic. In fact, the whole classification of Semitic languages is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning brain. Hebrew, Aramaic, and the rest of these made-up dialect continua only have 22 letters out of the 29 proto-Semitic letters. Arabic has all 29. The difference between Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as the difference between Latin and pig Latin or Italian. "Phoenician" is an Arabic dialect continuum, and not only that, it is pidgin. It is simplified to the point of stupidity. Anyone with a basic knowledge of Arabic would see this clearly. What happened was that Arabic handicapped "scholars" saw the equivalent of Scottish Twitter spelling, with added mumbling due to phonemic mergers (22 letters, not 29), and mistakenly thought they were seeing a different language."
God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
Let's start with a simple sentence: The house is big. How would you say it in different Semitic languages?
Arabic:
البيتُ كبيرٌ
al-bayt-u kabīr-un
Proto-Semitic:
*ʔal-bayt-u kabīr-u
Hebrew:
הבית גדול
ha-bayit gadol
Akkadian:
bītum rabûm
Amharic:
ቤቱ ገደሉ
betu gedelu
Arabic and Proto-Semitic have the same word order (noun-adjective), the same definite article (al-), and the same case endings (-u for nominative). Hebrew and Akkadian have lost the case endings and changed the definite article (ha- and -um respectively). Amharic has changed the word order (adjective-noun) and the definite article (u-).
But Arabic is not only similar to Proto-Semitic, it is also pre-Semitic, meaning that it is the original form of Semitic before it split into different branches. This is because Arabic preserves many features that are not found in any other Semitic language, but are found in other Afro-Asiatic languages, such as Egyptian and Berber. These features include:
- The definite article al-, which is derived from the demonstrative pronoun *ʔal- 'that'. This article is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the article n- in Berber and the article p-, t-, n- in Egyptian.
- The dual number for nouns and verbs, which is marked by the suffix -ān or -ayn. This number is rare in other Semitic languages, but it is common in other Afro-Asiatic languages, such as Egyptian and Berber.
- The imperfective prefix t- for verbs, which indicates the second person singular feminine or third person plural feminine. This prefix is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the prefix t- in Berber and Egyptian.
- The passive voice for verbs, which is marked by the infix t between the first and second root consonants. This voice is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the passive voice in Egyptian and Berber.
Finally, let's look at a more complex sentence: The letter was written with a pen.
Arabic:
كُتِبَتِ الرِّسَالَةُ بِالقَلَمِ
kutiba-t al-risāla-t-u bi-l-qalam-i
Proto-Semitic:
*kutiba-t ʔal-risāla-t-u bi-l-qalam-i
Hebrew:
המכתב נכתב בעט
ha-michtav niktav ba-et
Akkadian:
šipram šapāru bēlum
Egyptian:
sḏm.n.f p-ẖry m rnp.t
Berber:
tturra-t tibratin s uccen
In the examples Arabic and Proto-Semitic have the same word order (verb-subject-object), the same passive voice marker (-t-), the same definite article (al-), and the same preposition (bi-). Hebrew has changed the word order (subject-verb-object), lost the passive voice marker, changed the definite article (ha-) and the preposition (ba-). Akkadian has changed the word order (object-subject-verb), lost the passive voice marker, changed the definite article (-um) and the preposition (bēlum).
These examples show that classical Arabic has more consonants and vowels than other semitic languages, and that it preserves some sounds that were lost or changed in other semitic languages. This means that classical Arabic can encode more information in a given unit of speech than other semitic languages, and that it is closer to the original sound system of protosemitic., we can see that classical Arabic has more grammatical features than the other languages, such as case endings, mood endings, and root and pattern system. These features make classical Arabic more expressive and precise than the other languages, as it can convey more information and nuances in a single word or phrase. Classical Arabic is also more flexible than the other languages, as it can use different word orders and verb forms to emphasize different aspects of the sentence. Classical Arabic is therefore older and more original than the other languages. "Semitic" is just mumbled Arabic, really. Imagine English with a third of its letters removed and simplified grammar. That's Aramaic, Hebrew, etc. For example, combine T and D into just T; there's no need to have 2 letters. The same goes for i, e, y - they should all be just y from now on, etc., etc. Arabic is the only corollary to proto-Semitic. In fact, the whole classification of Semitic languages is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning brain. Hebrew, Aramaic, and the rest of these made-up dialect continua only have 22 letters out of the 29 proto-Semitic letters. Arabic has all 29. The difference between Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as the difference between Latin and pig Latin or Italian. "Phoenician" is an Arabic dialect continuum, and not only that, it is pidgin. It is simplified to the point of stupidity. Anyone with a basic knowledge of Arabic would see this clearly. What happened was that Arabic handicapped "scholars" saw the equivalent of Scottish Twitter spelling, with added mumbling due to phonemic mergers (22 letters, not 29), and mistakenly thought they were seeing a different language."
Matter of fact that all this, and the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and the complexity all of it was derived from the Qur'an, it was by analysing the syntactic structure of the Quran that the Arabic root system was developed, first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage (of the same language) dictionary of its kind, preceding the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years, that the concept of Arabic root was developed and later co-opted into "semitic root" that the ancient scripts were deciphered, they quite literally copy pasted the entirey of Arabic root. hebrew had been dead, and so were all the other dialects of Arabic until being "revived" in a frankensteinian fashion in the 18th, 19th centuries. The whole region spoke basically the same language, mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language became more degenerate and then the Quran appears with the oldest form possible of the language thousands of years later It is why the Arabs back then were challenged to produce 10 verses similar, and they couldnt. People think it's a miracle becau'e they couldnt do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself, they had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision behind it. And I quite literally mean, mathematical.
Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of yeara later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before and in the highest form the language had ever taken and the language is lexically, syntactically, phonemically and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing, infact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it, and not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book that in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take, so high infact it is theoretically not possible to surpass it all in a script that had never been recorded before and so the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began
and age of reason and rationality was born from its study
God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
I thank David Wood for helping me in my lessons in the Defense Against Islam. Now Muslims who tried to take advantage of my lack of knowledge of scripture (I’m still reading the New Testament) can no longer get away with lying to me. And without lies, Islam dies.
I, myself, have read the Bible, Quran and parts of Bhagadavad Gita. It is important to read those scriptures at least once and then it’s harder for people to manipulate you.
You are scared to argue with Muslim I know 😂
@@muhammadsair3598 Far from it. I’ve argued with multiple Muslims.
I'll save my time of reading for God's word and Worship.
I trust David's talents.
@@Earthangeljoela Tell the truth and calls sinners to repentance and placing their faith in Jesus Christ for salvation.
Many thanks. I visit family in NYC and have found myself discussing Islam and Christianity with a Muslim more than once.
The Quran was revealed in arabic cause Alllah is an arab.
Allah is no one else then Muhammad.
Thomas Jefferson learned Arabic for the express purpose so that he can learn how to read the Quran. Once he did he realized how dangerous that religion was
It is not a religion its a cult .
Yeah, Thomas actually wanted to have peace with some Muslims who had been raiding American shipping vessels and enslaving the crews and he asked what kind of arrangement they could make to get that to stop.
They told him that was impossible because their prophet commanded them to wage war and enslave anyone who wasn’t Muslim. So I’m not surprised that once he was told that he wanted to find out what else their prophet asked of them.
@@ranro7371yeah, we’ve seen your replies to every other comment on this video. We’re trying to talk about Thomas Jefferson right now though, luckily he wrote in English so we know what he had to say.
damn must be scary satanic religion he faced there
Winston Churchill as well.
The miracle of the Perfectly Preserved Holey qur'an is that folks actually believe that it's Perfectly Preserved!
@@ranro7371 if that’s the case allah also made some big historical blunders such as Mary being a part of the trinity, mistaking Ezra for being the son of God, mistaking Mary the mother of Jesus for the sister of Moses and Aaron. Yeah really looks inspired.
@@ranro7371 So why is there Jewish Folklore in the Perfectly Preserved Holey qur'an? Didn't your allah know? 🤣
I started reading the Quran to understand where my muslim friends were coming from and i expected a chronological telling of events and detailed introduction of characters like in the bible...but it started very randomly with random people being mentioned here and there with no context whatsoever as to who they were or what they did, completely incoherent...honestly if i didnt have previous biblical knowledge about certain characters, I'd have been totally lost and confused after the first pages.
...talking about the true 'author of confusion' 👀
I've noticed the same issue with the Quran. The chapters and verses aren't in chronological order. Chapter 9 of the Quran comes in the beginning of the book, but yet according to the Hadiths, its the soo called last group of revelations Mohammed "received", so technically it should come at the end of the book and not the beginning. The Quran is a disaster.
@@ranro7371 if that’s the case then allah made som big historical blunders such as Mary being a part of the trinity, mistaking Ezra for the son of God, mistaking Mary the mother of Jesus for the sister of Moses and Aaron and denying Jesus died at crucifixtion.
The Bible is not chronological
@crazysphynxcatlady3359 it is. Genesis to Revelation. The beginning to the end of times
The story is that when it got compiled the secretary dropped the pages. 🤣
Btw, if they say "Trust me, I read it in Arabic and it's the most beautiful book ever," you can answer them "Have you read then all the books of the world in their original languages?" Quixote in Spanish, La Divina Comedia in Italian, Genji Monogatari in Japanese, etc. etc. etc.
"The Quran is less interesting and less impressive then a phone book" That was Epic !! 😂
@@ranro7371Arabic is both old, simple and caries a very ugly tongue.
There's a very good reason there are more modern and versatile languages.
But seriously, do you really believe a lot of people will read your miles of lazy copy/pasting?
The examples cited are misrepresented, of the verses he cites:
Surah An-Nisaa Aya 46 which Addresses people like those in the video who take verses from the Quran out of their context. Infact even the examples he is using,
Surah Al-Sajdah, Surah 32 which he begins with it starts with addressing all of mankind
Surah Al-Nahl, Surah 16 in the verse he is citing it is again addressing all of mankind, saying that Islam is the truth, addressing those who worship tyrant/leaders,
Surah Ya-Sin, the 34th surah Aya 1-16 is deliberatley misinterpeted to have been referring to Arabs, when infact it is addressing all of those who know about or heard the Quran, the same is true for literally every verse he cites, go to his citation and read the preceding verses to see for yourself, every single point raised here is addressed in the Qur'an itself.
In addition from Surahs he does not cite:
Surah Al-Ma'idah Aya - 48 shows that the Quran supersedes all other revelations
Surah Al-Nisaa Aya - 46 Addresses people like those in the video who take verses from the Quran out of their context
Surah Aal-Imraan Aya 96 - Addresses all of mankind
Surah Al-Baqarah Aya 1-7, The first Surah after the opening has all the point addressed and example of people like him rebuked
Surah Al-Hujurat Aya 13 - Addresses the creation of humanity into different peoples
Surah Al-A'raaf Aya 171 to 178, - Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge
Surah Al-Jumu'a Aya 1 to 8 Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge
Surah Al-Anbiya 107 - The role of the prophet
The Aramaic word for God is Alaha. It's the word Isa PBUH (Jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J). Sounds familiar? Written without the confusing vowels, it is A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), adducted from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum) 'A-L-L-H' (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha).
The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes as aforementioned. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one. In addition, The word God in hebrew is eloah, is a cognate of the Arabic I-L-H, pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it into eloh, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elah. Infact it is written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic cause it is an Alef with hamza below (إ أ ) They are two different forms of Alef. And it mean "a god", it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا)
"protosemetic" Alphabet (29), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22)
𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼
ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي
A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y
א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת
Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic:
ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain
س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining
ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining
ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining
ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining
ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining
The reason why the protoS alphabet here is 28 and not 29, is because the supposed extra letter is simply a س written in a different position, but it was shoehorned to obfuscated. In Arabic letter shapes are different depending on whether they are in the beginning , middle or end of a word.
This kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua. As a matter of fact, all of the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and their complexity was derived from the Qur'an. It was by analyzing the syntactic structure of the Qur'an that the Arabic root system was developed. This system was first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, which preceded the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years. It was through this development that the concept of Arabic roots was established and later co-opted into the term 'semitic root,' allowing the decipherment of ancient scripts. In essence, they quite literally copied and pasted the entirety of the Arabic root. Hebrew had been dead, as well as all the other dialects of Arabic, until being 'revived' in a Frankensteinian fashion in the 18th and 19th centuries. The entire region spoke basically the same language, with mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language gradually became more degenerate, and then the Qur'an appeared with the oldest possible form of the language thousands of years later. This is why the Arabs of that time were challenged to produce 10 similar verses, and they couldn't. People think it's a miracle because they couldn't do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself. They had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision. And when I say mathematical, I quite literally mean mathematical. Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken? The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study.real
God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
Part 2
Language; When you look at the actual linguistics, you'll find that many were puzzled by the opposite, that is, how the other "semetic" (why in quotes will be revealed later) languages were more "evolved" than Arabic, while Arabic had archaic features, not only archaic compared to bibilical Hebrew, Ethiopic, "Aramaic" contemporary "semetic" languages, but even archaic compared to languages from ancient antiquity; Ugaritic, Akkadain. What is meant here by Archaic is not what most readers think, it is Archaic not in the sense that it is simple, but rather that it is complex (think Latin to pig Latin or Italian or Old English, which had genders and case endings to modern English), not only grammatically, but also phonetically; All the so called semitic languages are supposed to have evolved from protosemetic, the Alphabet for protosemitic is that of the so called Ancient South Arabian (which interestingly corresponds with the traditional Arabic origins account) and has 28 Phonemes. Arabic has 28 phonemes. Hebrew has 22, same as Aramaic, and other "semitic" languages. Now pause for a second and think about it, how come Arabic, a language that is supposed to have come so late has the same number of letters as a language that supposedly predates it by over a millennium (Musnad script ~1300 BCE). Not only is the glossary of phonemes more diverse than any other semitic language, but the grammar is more complex, containing more cases and retains what's linguists noted for its antiquity, broken plurals. Indeed, a linguist has once noted that if one were to take everything we know about languages and how they develop, Arabic is older than Akkadian (~2500 BCE).
|Classical Arabic | 28 consonants, 29 with Hamza and 6 vowels; some consonants are emphatic or pharyngealized; some vowels are marked with diacritics | Complex system of word formation based on roots and patterns; roots are sequences of consonants that carry the basic meaning of a word; patterns are sequences of vowels and affixes that modify the meaning and function of a word | Flexible word order, but VSO is most common; SVO is also possible; subject and object are marked by case endings (-u for nominative, -a for accusative, -i for genitive); verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different moods and aspects |
| Akkadian | 22 consonants and 3 vowels; some consonants are glottalized or palatalized; vowels are not marked | Similar system, but with different roots and patterns; some roots have more than three consonants; some patterns have infixes or reduplication | Fixed word order of SVO; subject and object are not marked by case endings, but by prepositions or word order; verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different tenses and aspects |
| Aramaic | 22 consonants and 3 vowels (later variants have more); no emphatic or pharyngealized consonants (except in some dialects); vowels are not marked (except in later variants such as Syriac) | Simple system of word formation based on prefixes and suffixes; some roots or patterns exist, but are less productive than in Arabic or Akkadian |
Arabic is the only corollary to proto-semitic, infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning mass between their ears. hebrew, aramaic, rest of madeup dialect continua only have 22 letters of the 29 protosemitic letters Arabic has all 29. The difference betweeen Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as that between Latin and pig latin or italian.
"Semitic" is just mumbled Arabic, really. Imagine English with a third of its letters removed and simplified grammar. That's Aramaic, Hebrew, etc. For example, combine T and D into just T; there's no need to have 2 letters. The same goes for i, e, y - they should all be just y from now on, etc., etc. Arabic is the only corollary to proto-Semitic. In fact, the whole classification of Semitic languages is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning brain. Hebrew, Aramaic, and the rest of these made-up dialect continua only have 22 letters out of the 29 proto-Semitic letters. Arabic has all 29. The difference between Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as the difference between Latin and pig Latin or Italian. "Phoenician" is an Arabic dialect continuum, and not only that, it is pidgin. It is simplified to the point of stupidity. Anyone with a basic knowledge of Arabic would see this clearly. What happened was that Arabic handicapped "scholars" saw the equivalent of Scottish Twitter spelling, with added mumbling due to phonemic mergers (22 letters, not 29), and mistakenly thought they were seeing a different language."
God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
Let's start with a simple sentence: The house is big. How would you say it in different Semitic languages?
Arabic:
البيتُ كبيرٌ
al-bayt-u kabīr-un
Proto-Semitic:
*ʔal-bayt-u kabīr-u
Hebrew:
הבית גדול
ha-bayit gadol
Akkadian:
bītum rabûm
Amharic:
ቤቱ ገደሉ
betu gedelu
Arabic and Proto-Semitic have the same word order (noun-adjective), the same definite article (al-), and the same case endings (-u for nominative). Hebrew and Akkadian have lost the case endings and changed the definite article (ha- and -um respectively). Amharic has changed the word order (adjective-noun) and the definite article (u-).
But Arabic is not only similar to Proto-Semitic, it is also pre-Semitic, meaning that it is the original form of Semitic before it split into different branches. This is because Arabic preserves many features that are not found in any other Semitic language, but are found in other Afro-Asiatic languages, such as Egyptian and Berber. These features include:
- The definite article al-, which is derived from the demonstrative pronoun *ʔal- 'that'. This article is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the article n- in Berber and the article p-, t-, n- in Egyptian.
- The dual number for nouns and verbs, which is marked by the suffix -ān or -ayn. This number is rare in other Semitic languages, but it is common in other Afro-Asiatic languages, such as Egyptian and Berber.
- The imperfective prefix t- for verbs, which indicates the second person singular feminine or third person plural feminine. This prefix is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the prefix t- in Berber and Egyptian.
- The passive voice for verbs, which is marked by the infix t between the first and second root consonants. This voice is unique to Arabic among Semitic languages, but it is similar to the passive voice in Egyptian and Berber.
Finally, let's look at a more complex sentence: The letter was written with a pen.
Arabic:
كُتِبَتِ الرِّسَالَةُ بِالقَلَمِ
kutiba-t al-risāla-t-u bi-l-qalam-i
Proto-Semitic:
*kutiba-t ʔal-risāla-t-u bi-l-qalam-i
Hebrew:
המכתב נכתב בעט
ha-michtav niktav ba-et
Akkadian:
šipram šapāru bēlum
Egyptian:
sḏm.n.f p-ẖry m rnp.t
Berber:
tturra-t tibratin s uccen
In the examples Arabic and Proto-Semitic have the same word order (verb-subject-object), the same passive voice marker (-t-), the same definite article (al-), and the same preposition (bi-). Hebrew has changed the word order (subject-verb-object), lost the passive voice marker, changed the definite article (ha-) and the preposition (ba-). Akkadian has changed the word order (object-subject-verb), lost the passive voice marker, changed the definite article (-um) and the preposition (bēlum).
These examples show that classical Arabic has more consonants and vowels than other semitic languages, and that it preserves some sounds that were lost or changed in other semitic languages. This means that classical Arabic can encode more information in a given unit of speech than other semitic languages, and that it is closer to the original sound system of protosemitic., we can see that classical Arabic has more grammatical features than the other languages, such as case endings, mood endings, and root and pattern system. These features make classical Arabic more expressive and precise than the other languages, as it can convey more information and nuances in a single word or phrase. Classical Arabic is also more flexible than the other languages, as it can use different word orders and verb forms to emphasize different aspects of the sentence. Classical Arabic is therefore older and more original than the other languages. "Semitic" is just mumbled Arabic, really. Imagine English with a third of its letters removed and simplified grammar. That's Aramaic, Hebrew, etc. For example, combine T and D into just T; there's no need to have 2 letters. The same goes for i, e, y - they should all be just y from now on, etc., etc. Arabic is the only corollary to proto-Semitic. In fact, the whole classification of Semitic languages is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning brain. Hebrew, Aramaic, and the rest of these made-up dialect continua only have 22 letters out of the 29 proto-Semitic letters. Arabic has all 29. The difference between Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as the difference between Latin and pig Latin or Italian. "Phoenician" is an Arabic dialect continuum, and not only that, it is pidgin. It is simplified to the point of stupidity. Anyone with a basic knowledge of Arabic would see this clearly. What happened was that Arabic handicapped "scholars" saw the equivalent of Scottish Twitter spelling, with added mumbling due to phonemic mergers (22 letters, not 29), and mistakenly thought they were seeing a different language."
Matter of fact that all this, and the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and the complexity all of it was derived from the Qur'an, it was by analysing the syntactic structure of the Quran that the Arabic root system was developed, first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage (of the same language) dictionary of its kind, preceding the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years, that the concept of Arabic root was developed and later co-opted into "semitic root" that the ancient scripts were deciphered, they quite literally copy pasted the entirey of Arabic root. hebrew had been dead, and so were all the other dialects of Arabic until being "revived" in a frankensteinian fashion in the 18th, 19th centuries. The whole region spoke basically the same language, mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language became more degenerate and then the Quran appears with the oldest form possible of the language thousands of years later It is why the Arabs back then were challenged to produce 10 verses similar, and they couldnt. People think it's a miracle becau'e they couldnt do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself, they had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision behind it. And I quite literally mean, mathematical.
Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of yeara later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before and in the highest form the language had ever taken and the language is lexically, syntactically, phonemically and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing, infact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it, and not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book that in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take, so high infact it is theoretically not possible to surpass it all in a script that had never been recorded before and so the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began
and age of reason and rationality was born from its study
God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
@@mznxbcv12345 Sooo funny to see you think anyone is going to read past two sentences of this copy/paste pie. 😄
Muslims looking for the one perfectly preserved Quran, you can find it right next to Uthman Ibn Smollett's police report.🤣
Bro I just like how you are everywhere..
Smollet- Go Woke Go Broke parody song.
I tried reading the Quran several years ago, and was impressed to learn how short it is compared to the Bible (shorter than the New Testament).
It was so incoherent that I lasted 5 minutes and gave up not expecting anything beneficial to come of my invested time.
Same lol
Beneficial? Read the Song of Solomon. In your bible.
@@muhammadsair3598 funny thing is Muslim tell us mohammeds name is in songs of Solomon which are love letters between Solomon and wife used for marriage counseling in Christianity.
@@adjoa-anima
Beat me to it.
We're waiting, stone-kisser.
@@adjoa-anima love letters or pure porn ?
Your research is on point. Really good job, love hearing your work
2 German universities researchers whose works on the Koran origins had their works suppressed by the german authorities & dismissed from their positions in the 70s when it they found most of the verses can be traced to new testament writings & christian hymn. It was feared that it would lead to riots in Germany then. The Koran was originally written in Nabataean language, not Arabic.
Wow sounds interesting, do you have any sources on this that I could dig deeper into?
Right! The verse that says killing one innocent person is like Killing all people every Muslim brings up whenever a terr0r!st attack happens, is taken verbatim from the Talmud.
The Quran is taken from a whole bunch of religions, well, only what Muhammed knew about these religions,
That's obvious from when Allah asks Jesus in the Quran if He "told people to make a God out of Him and His mother" its obvious that Muhammad didn't know that Muhammad didn't know that Christians never worshiped mary, they honor her,
One other thing, is that at a certain point, Arabic language almost got lost to Turkish during the othmani "Turkish" invasion over Arabic regions.
The only thing that kept the language from vanishing was priests hiding scrolls and books in churches, that's why every single Quran you find today is from after 1925(after the end of the othmani invasion)
@@1monk1year He also seemed to think that the Gospel and Torah at the time confirmed the his made up Quran lol
Wow! Interesting
Very well presented and flowing with clarity unlike the Quran.
@@ranro7371 _Matter of fact that all this,..._
It's already shown that nothing you are saying is a matter of fact except for the Koran being written in Arabic.
@@ranro7371 _Surah Al-Ma'idah Aya - 48 shows that the Quran supersedes all other revelations_
Why are you trolling, troll, as you will ignore this and not reply to it? But which that claim is discredited by the fact that all of that is because of one person, Mohammad, and isn't corroborated by anything else and no one is obligated to accept the uncorroborated, unsubstantiated claims of Mohammad. In other words, none of that means anything anyone is obligated to accept.
lol right
@@ranro7371 and who backs Mohammed? Who can vouch for him? No one, he did no miracles, no prophecy etc., no angels declared him, no scriptures foretold of him, no nothing. Just him and his word. You've been brainwashed by a cult. And yes I know about the sandstorm and the magic horse ride etc. God Bless!
The examples cited are misrepresented, of the verses he cites:
Surah An-Nisaa Aya 46 which Addresses people like those in the video who take verses from the Quran out of their context. Infact even the examples he is using,
Surah Al-Sajdah, Surah 32 which he begins with it starts with addressing all of mankind
Surah Al-Nahl, Surah 16 in the verse he is citing it is again addressing all of mankind, saying that Islam is the truth, addressing those who worship tyrant/leaders,
Surah Ya-Sin, the 34th surah Aya 1-16 is deliberatley misinterpeted to have been referring to Arabs, when infact it is addressing all of those who know about or heard the Quran, the same is true for literally every verse he cites, go to his citation and read the preceding verses to see for yourself, every single point raised here is addressed in the Qur'an itself.
In addition from Surahs he does not cite:
Surah Al-Ma'idah Aya - 48 shows that the Quran supersedes all other revelations
Surah Al-Nisaa Aya - 46 Addresses people like those in the video who take verses from the Quran out of their context
Surah Aal-Imraan Aya 96 - Addresses all of mankind
Surah Al-Baqarah Aya 1-7, The first Surah after the opening has all the point addressed and example of people like him rebuked
Surah Al-Hujurat Aya 13 - Addresses the creation of humanity into different peoples
Surah Al-A'raaf Aya 171 to 178, - Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge
Surah Al-Jumu'a Aya 1 to 8 Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge
Surah Al-Anbiya 107 - The role of the prophet
Dear Dr. David, thank you so much for the incredible research you put into your videos. As an Assyrian, my people have also endured a lot of suffering due to Islam. I wish you the blessings of Jesus and hope you continue to have the strength to keep uploading these insightful videos.
😂😂😂
@@muhammadsair3598bro was possessed by Muhammad 💀💀
God bless you my Assyriam bro in Christ!!!
@@FriendlyEvangelist God bless you too, brother ✝️
@@ranro7371 _Here is a factual statement. The Arabic language is the oldest continually spoken language in the world, back._
The facts say that's not a factual statement.
Excellent David Wood. You are born for such as time as this.
I wish and pray my Muslim family will start asking question of there faith because I find it dificult for a Muslim to listen unless they start daughting.
Doubt brings the Muslim to hellfire 🔥 and so the endless loop continues.
Yes that’s how it works. If you start doubting you burn in hell forever so don’t do it. That’s how they get you to never give up Islam.
@@ranro7371 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Still copying and pasting lies while you want others to fall for it stupidly like you do, Abdul??
The very 1st premise of Arabic being the oldest is super hilariously stupid because there are at least 3 or more languages that are waaaay older and still in use today!!!
So therefore, your entire copy paste is totally meaningless because like the weak religion we hilariously call Islame, it’s crumbling like a thin wall of cards!!!
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@ranro7371 still copying and pasting meaningless text which no one cares to read when your very 1st premise is already stupid???
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Nope really he try to cover Allah`s light but I moved by beauty of Quran
A religion shouldn't need clerics and Mullahs to interpret and teach. The New Testament wipes the floor with the Quran in that regard.
Because this is the internet I have to lead with this: I agree with you.
Now, here's a related point that is valuable to know and I want to simply share it, not debate it.
Only after protestant Christians printed copies of the New Testament in English AND taught people to read in English has the western world known what it was saying. Before, Catholics only printed it and read it in Latin at mass and didn't print extra copies and didn't teach the people to read Latin or understand what was being read to them. Once the protestants produced the Geneva editions, the Church of England, considered "Anglo-Catholic" or simply put not protestant, worked to print the King James Version. Sources say it is "unclear" whether the Church of England is "in communion with Rome" but I digress.
It is better written, but was written in the context of a living church/ecclesiastical apostolic organisation
They are both fairytale books
@@aacc-sy3sd _They are both fairytale books_
That's the biggest fairytale of them all that the Bible is a fairytale.
Surah Al-Nisaa Aya - 46 Addresses people like those in the video who take verses from the Quran out of their context. The examples cited are misrepresented, of the verses he cites:
Surah Al-Sajdah, Surah 32 which he begins with it starts with addressing all of mankind
Surah Al-Nahl, Surah 16 in the verse he is citing it is again addressing all of mankind, saying that Islam is the truth, addressing those who worship tyrant/leaders,
Surah Ya-Sin, the 34th surah Aya 1-16 is deliberatley misinterpeted to have been referring to Arabs, when infact it is addressing all of those who know about or heard the Quran, the same is true for literally every verse he cites, go to his citation and read the preceding verses to see for yourself, every single point raised here is addressed in the Qur'an itself. In addition from Surahs he does not cite:
Surah Al-Ma'idah Aya - 48 shows that the Quran supersedes all other revelations
Surah Aal-Imraan Aya 96 - Addresses all of mankind
Surah Al-Baqarah Aya 1-7, The first Surah after the
opening has all the point addressed and example of people like him rebuked
Surah Al-Hujurat Aya 13 - Addresses the creation of humanity into different peoples
Surah Al-A'raaf Aya 171 to 178, - Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge
Surah Al-Jumu'a Aya 1 to 8 Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge
Surah Al-Anbiya 107 - The role of the prophet
The Aramaic word for God is "Alaha". It's the word Isa PBUH used. Sounds familiar? Written without the confusing vowels it is written A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), reduced from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum) it is written in the Arabic script 'A-L-L-H' (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha) add an A before the last H for vocalization.
The word God in another rendition in Hebrew ʾĕlōah is derived from a base ʾilāh, an Arabic word, written without confusing vowel it is A-L-H in the Arabic script, pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elaha. Infact both are written written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic and not A because it is an Alef with hamza below (إ أ )
They are two different forms of Alef. And it mean "a god", it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا)
Jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J. The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes as will be explained. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one.
Schlözer in his preparation for the Arabia expedition in 1781 coined the term Semitic language:
"From the Mediterranean to the Euphrates, from Mesopotamia to Arabia ruled one language, as is well known. Thus Syrians, Babylonians, Hebrews, and Arabs were one people (ein Volk). Phoenicians (Hamites) also spoke this language, which I would like to call the Semitic (die Semitische)." -Before Boas: The Genesis of Ethnography and Ethnology in the German By Han F. Vermeulen. He was only half right though, Arabic is the only corollary to "proto-semitic", infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical as will be shown.
"Semitic" is just mumbled Arabic, really. Imagine English with a third of its letters removed and simplified grammar. That's Aramaic, Hebrew, etc. For example, combine T and D into just T; there's no need to have 2 letters. The same goes for i, e, y - they should all be just y from now on, etc., etc. Arabic is the only corollary to proto-Semitic. In fact, the whole classification of Semitic languages is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning brain. Hebrew, Aramaic, and the rest of these made-up dialect continua only have 22 letters out of the 29 proto-Semitic letters. Arabic has all 29. The difference between Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as the difference between Latin and pig Latin or Italian. "Phoenician" is an Arabic dialect continuum, and not only that, it is pidgin. It is simplified to the point of stupidity. Anyone with a basic knowledge of Arabic would see this clearly. What happened was that Arabic handicapped "scholars" saw the equivalent of Scottish Twitter spelling, with added mumbling due to phonemic mergers (22 letters, not 29), and mistakenly thought they were seeing a different language."
"protosemetic" Alphabet (29), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22)
𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼
ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي
A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y
א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת
Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic:
ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain
س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining
ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining
ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining
ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining
ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining
protoS 29th is a س written in a different position, but was shoehorned to obfuscate.
This kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua. As a matter of fact, all of the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and their complexity was derived from the Qur'an. It was by analyzing the syntactic structure of the Qur'an that the Arabic root system was developed. This system was first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, which preceded the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years. It was through this development that the concept of Arabic roots was established and later co-opted into the term 'semitic root,' allowing the decipherment of ancient scripts. In essence, they quite literally copied and pasted the entirety of the Arabic root. Hebrew had been dead, as well as all the other dialects of Arabic, until being 'revived' in a Frankensteinian fashion in the 18th and 19th centuries. The entire region spoke basically the same language, with mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language gradually became more degenerate, and then the Qur'an appeared with the oldest possible form of the language thousands of years later. This is why the Arabs of that time were challenged to produce 10 similar verses, and they couldn't. People think it's a miracle because they couldn't do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself. They had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision. And when I say mathematical, I quite literally mean mathematical.
Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken?
The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study.real
God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
A language may or may not be beautiful, wonderful, etc, but this is extremely subjective. For me personally, I cannot accept the superiority of Arabic as the quran fails in delivery or communication. I have had several years of experience of training people in communication, and the number one rule is to know your audience and communicate in clear precise sentences according to the comprehension level of your audience. Nevertheless, the quran fails in this regard. 🥺
Thank you for your exceptionally detailed arguments outlined in your videos. You make everything so clear.
I was hit by the irony that Allah ordained for the Arabic people to have the message in their language last yet he picked Muhammad who couldn't read it or write it to reveal it to them in Arabic. In fact, other people would have to remember and recite it and write it down for Muhammad to preserve it for the Arabic people.
That's the miracle, so that now you can't say that all the stuff in the Quran is what the prophet knew already because he was a genius and studied every book they had - in the huge libraries of the desert -
@@btc-newswait are joking about his reading every book in the desert. Because I think it was just established that he was illiterate. Maybe I am missing the joke
@@davidmorris3682Muslims are prohibited from reading the Bible. Why is such prohibition necessary for the people who are secure in their beliefs?
😂@@btc-news
@@btc-newsyou should do stand up comedy because that’s a good one lmao
I tried to read the English version once... probably got like 1/4 through and OMG, definitely very much all over the place little to no structure. Alot of threats for hell fire 🔥🔥🔥
The word you are looking for is - "shite"
Makes us so gratefull for 2 Timothy 1:7For God has not given us a spirit of fear, but of power and of love and of a sound mind.!
One of the reason I left Islam was prayers in Arabic why can't my god take prayer in my native language
Thanks to Nabeel Qureshi's book I found Jesus Christ the lord and savior who dont have any language barrier to pray
May be you're from Afghanistan, that's why?
@@hrangkhol9057 Actually Indian was extremely religious even studied under big ulamas (big religious teachers ) used to lead prayer even in ramadan for tarweeh ( long prayer )
Moved to Middle east to live Islamic faced Arab non Arab discrimination started to study with open mind became atheist then a friend who was running underground church suggested Nabeels book Seeking allah finding Jesus it changed life
Started to study myself thanks to bible app by yourvision and free kindle version of bible with christian channels in youtube Accepted Jesus Christ just few months back but still cant express due to fear of actions from peaceful fellow muslims
Trust in Jesus and don't worry. Worship The Father, The Son, and the Holy Spirit where you are. That is all that is required of you.@@wellhai
@@wellhaii think Indian Muslim's are far more better than your Pak Afghan Bangladeshi Neighbor's.
Hope your family will respect your choice 🙏❤️
of course you can do prayers in your native language!
Wow! just chancing on your video for the first time and I love the way you present it verse by verse.
I’m was thinking we needed a new video out like that. Thank you for making it.
I was thinking the same thing!
YOU SEE...Dawood believes in pagan telepathy, he is not a Christian! YOU SEE!😅
I was just browsing on line when I came across your video. Two minutes in and I was hooked. My instincts told me that there were problems with the bits of the Qur'an I had been exposed to but I just set these aside. Your video has given me the inspiration to read up and study the subject more deeply. Thank you for a thoroughly inspiring twenty five minutes. I will of course be studying my bible more deeply as a result!
It is supposed to be read and understood by ALL people in the world, but there is verses that no one can understand such as "Alif-Lam-Mim". 😂😂😂😂😂
My two daughters studied arabic as compulsory subject in school in Dubai, and French as optional subject. They scored 100% in French and are pretty proficient in reading, writing and can comprehend . Whereas arabic language has been frustrating to them in spite of private coaching!!
What an imperfect language
Skill issue.
Since you’re here writing in English with an English based username, I’m pretty confident in betting you’re a native English speaker, or the very least a European speaker. Arabic is a very different language because it’s Semetic language. So learning it requires a complete rebuild of how you approach and relate with language. US state department puts it in the very hard category, and they’d know a thing or 80 about teaching people languages.
I’m a native English speaker and it took me about six years to actually get good at Russian, and that’s another European language, which works about 80% the same.
You’re an adequacy it’s not a problem on God’s part it’s your issue.
A muslim youtuber in my country once said "if you find some verses doesn't make any sense, DON'T EVER QUESTION!! because that's might be a Mutasyabihat verses!! If you trying to question it, you are a sinner!" What a joke
Ask the right person you don't ask a car driver how to drive a truck to get the right answer
Thank you for this insight. I am a teacher, so I thought I should be able to understand what I am reading but often, after reading and rereading some verses of the Quran I still could not make sense of it. I was beginning to wonder if there was something wrong with me. What a relief to hear that even experts find it unintelligible.
@jazzymilesmiles3308We have Greeks and bible scholars whi studied Hebrew in our church so we have no trouble with getting the text in uts original language. By the way it still says the same thing no matter what language and we know this as we are a mostly African church who read the bible in West African languages and when compared to the Greek, Hebrew and English it says the same thing.
@jazzymilesmiles3308 You are contradicting yourself. Can you read Arabic? If you can read Arabic, why do you need an Imam? If you can't read Arabic, and need an Imam, you are being a hypocrite since you are the same as you are accusing Christians of being.
God is not the author of confusion but Satan is
@@ranro7371 Irrelevant. No one has to accept what Mohammad says.
@@ranro7371 The facts are that is false Arabic is the oldest continually spoken language of the world. Chinese, Aramaic and Sanskrit are older. You really should refrain from Islamic indoctrinated propaganda. You are as bad as the Catholic church!
Why does Allah keep reminding me how gracious and merciful and loving He is? The Lord Jesus Christ showed me how gracious and merciful and loving He is on the cross, no need to tell people how mighty He is.❤
I've noticed that too 😂.. its like Allah is a very prideful, narcissistic god, who loves to compliment himself alot in his own book 😂😂😂.
@@JKRucit reminds me of this passage: ”How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High. Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit.“
Isaiah 14:12-15 KJV
Would not a god prove his words true with his deeds, unless the god was a deceiver. And Allah does call himself the greatest deceiver, so.. Can't expect actual mercy or compassion except in words.
I love your humour as much as your elucidation. Interesting, enjoyable, entertaining.
I want to thank you.
That you speak calmly and are very easy to understand for non-native speakers!
Thank you from Germany
Jesus Christ bless you brother love from India Christian
Muslims should understand if you have to deceive someone to accept a religion, then it wasn't a religion given by a holy and righteous God.
if you have to lie about your religion your convincing people to follow a false religion. your just wasting people's time or making people hypocrites.
To say God only speaks Arabic. Wow just wow. I’ve read the Quran. I felt afterwards. I was dragging my knuckles when i walked drooling and moaning.
Thanks David, blessings to you and your family.
The Gospel message works in every language.
Trinitarians are inoculated from rationality, facts and logic. It is no surprise that basic reasoning is entirely lost on those that believe that the creator became one of those he created in order to save the created from his own self. Not to mention the incoherence in the scripture, never minding the creed itself.
Matthew 4:1) Jesus was tempted
[James 1:13) God cannot be tempted
(John 1:29) Jesus was seen
(1 John 4:12) No man has ever seen God
(Acts 2:22) Jesus was and is a man, sent by God
(Numbers 23:19, Hosea 11:9) God is not a man
(Hebrews 5:8-9) Jesus had to grow and learn
(Isaiah 40:28) God doesn't ever need to learn
(1 Corinthians 15: 3-4) Jesus Died
(1 Timothy 1:17) God cannot die
(Hebrews 5:7) Jesus needed salvation
(Luke 1:37) God doesn't need salvation
(John 4:6) Jesus grew weary
(Isaiah 40:28) God cannot grow weary
(Mark 4:38) Jesus slept
(Psalm 121: 2-4) God doesn't sleep
(John 5:19) Jesus wasn't all powerful
(Isaiah 45: 5-7) God is all powerful
(Mark 13:32) Jesus wasn't all knowing
(Isaiah 46:9) God is all knowing
@@mznxbcv12345 These "contradictions" show that you do not understand the concept of the Trinity. The essence of God is distinct from His ability to manifest within creation. Allah is weaker than Yahweh in that Allah has a bunch of things he cannot do that Yahweh actually can.
Allah cannot enter into creation and cannot experience creation.
Yahweh is outside of creation, but He is nonetheless able to manifest within His creation and experience it. He is capable of voluntarily limiting Himself and voluntarily subjecting Himself to the rules He placed upon creation.
Yahweh is capable of meeting with us face-to--face. He is capable of loving us on a personal level. While His essence is beyond our comprehension, He can interact with us in a form that we can comprehend.
And He can do these things while still retaining His complete essence. Unlike Allah, Yahweh can be more than one thing at once. Yahweh can be in more than one place at once. Yahweh is not a man, even though He can choose to be in the form of one.
@@mznxbcv12345 Do you want to understand the concept of the Trinity? The essence of God is distinct from His ability to manifest within creation. Allah is weaker than Yahweh in that Allah has a bunch of things he cannot do that Yahweh actually can.
Allah cannot enter into creation and cannot experience creation.
Yahweh is outside of creation, but He is nonetheless able to manifest within His creation and experience it. He is capable of voluntarily limiting Himself and voluntarily subjecting Himself to the rules He placed upon creation.
Yahweh is capable of meeting with us face-to--face. He is capable of loving us on a personal level. While His essence is beyond our comprehension, He can interact with us in a form that we can comprehend.
And He can do these things while still retaining His complete essence. Unlike Allah, Yahweh can be more than one thing at once. Yahweh can be in more than one place at once. Yahweh is not a man, even though He can choose to be in the form of one.
@@mznxbcv12345 The essence of God is distinct from His ability to manifest within creation. Allah is not like Yahweh in that Allah has a bunch of things he cannot do that Yahweh actually can.
Allah cannot enter into creation and cannot experience creation.
Yahweh is outside of creation, but He is nonetheless able to manifest within His creation and experience it. He is capable of voluntarily limiting Himself and voluntarily subjecting Himself to the rules He placed upon creation.
Yahweh is capable of meeting with us face-to--face. He is capable of loving us on a personal level. While His essence is beyond our comprehension, He can interact with us in a form that we can comprehend.
And He can do these things while still retaining His complete essence. Unlike Allah, Yahweh can be more than one thing at once. Yahweh can be in more than one place at once. Yahweh is not a man, even though He can choose to be in the form of one.
I beg to differ. The Christians hijacked the Jewish scripture and have made all sorts of inaccurate translations. One simple example being עלמה translated as a virgin when the Hebrew word means a young woman. And much more contradictions between the new testament and the original Scripture handed down to the Jews. .
To the US he even sent the Warner brothers 😂😂😂
I recently saw a Video where a London based researcher went into a Bookshop in Cairo wanting to buy a Koran in Arabic.
She was asked: which Koran do you want?
Taken aback she asked: how many are for sale in the Bookshop.
She purchased a copy of them all...........30 !!!!!!!!!
On researching them in London she and her team listed 9000 variations.
9,000 variations is crazy! The scope of manipulation is endless. No wonder they're a lost cause.
hahahaha what are you talking about
Link the video so that I may watch, thank you.
@@umarahmed7874Quran is changed, modern quran is 1929 Kairo version. Not the same as original qurans.
@@luiscrakson
Same crap different version
Amazing David! Thanks so much for all that you do. I have a good friend who is muslim and says he knows either Christianity or Islam is correct, but doesn't know which. He is open to the gospel and wants to learn, but he is being fed so many lies from the Imam (and speaks to Uthman)...... these videos are so helpful - thank you so much. praying for you and Marie and your bambinos x
You’re so lucky your friend is open. My Muslim friend won’t even read the Quran nor is open to knowing the Bible. In other words, she claims Muslim but lives Agnostic. I ask everyone for prayer 🙏 ❤
Rudyard Kipling Made Exceedingly Great Rewards Abraham Was Flawed
Izaak carried the covenant on.
Ishmael didn't. Though Abraham wanted them both to.
There's something dangerous in the stew.
The Living Bread Greatest Physician Mission Bruderhof.
Van Gogh Joni Mitchell Crazy?
Listen to her song on 1 Corinthians 13
@@7EmpathicBeauty For many in the west, following Islam is primarily a form of rebellion against Christianity, fueled by cultural pressures or some kind of personal beef. It doesn't matter what's in the Quran, only that it isn't the Bible. I wonder if your friend is in that category.
@@StanleypeterDickinsonwhat
@@ranro7371 The Quran takes itself out of context. The chapters are all scrambled out of chronological order.
You insist that the Quran is for all people, not just the Arabs. Tell me, how is the Quran better than the Gospel? Do you know what the Gospel is? Do you know what God did for humanity so that we no longer need to fear hell? Why is it that Muhammad was still afraid of hell if he was indeed a true prophet?
I'm glad I came up to you because as someone from West Europe and surrounded by Muslims it's important to know those kind of things to not be decieved
Even the Bahai Religion confirms that the previous books(Bible/Torah etc) were NOT corrupted...
I started to read the Quran I was disgusted with what I have read and I stopped reading it
Surah Al-Nisaa Aya - 46 Addresses people like those in the video who take verses from the Quran out of their context. The examples cited are misrepresented, of the verses he cites:
Surah Al-Sajdah, Surah 32 which he begins with it starts with addressing all of mankind
Surah Al-Nahl, Surah 16 in the verse he is citing it is again addressing all of mankind, saying that Islam is the truth, addressing those who worship tyrant/leaders,
Surah Ya-Sin, the 34th surah Aya 1-16 is deliberatley misinterpeted to have been referring to Arabs, when infact it is addressing all of those who know about or heard the Quran, the same is true for literally every verse he cites, go to his citation and read the preceding verses to see for yourself, every single point raised here is addressed in the Qur'an itself. In addition from Surahs he does not cite:
Surah Al-Ma'idah Aya - 48 shows that the Quran supersedes all other revelations
Surah Aal-Imraan Aya 96 - Addresses all of mankind
Surah Al-Baqarah Aya 1-7, The first Surah after the
opening has all the point addressed and example of people like him rebuked
Surah Al-Hujurat Aya 13 - Addresses the creation of humanity into different peoples
Surah Al-A'raaf Aya 171 to 178, - Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge
Surah Al-Jumu'a Aya 1 to 8 Addresses those who refuse to acknowledge
Surah Al-Anbiya 107 - The role of the prophet
The Aramaic word for God is "Alaha". It's the word Isa PBUH used. Sounds familiar? Written without the confusing vowels it is written A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), reduced from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum) it is written in the Arabic script 'A-L-L-H' (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha) add an A before the last H for vocalization.
The word God in another rendition in Hebrew ʾĕlōah is derived from a base ʾilāh, an Arabic word, written without confusing vowel it is A-L-H in the Arabic script, pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elaha. Infact both are written written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic and not A because it is an Alef with hamza below (إ أ )
They are two different forms of Alef. And it mean "a god", it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا)
Jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J. The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes as will be explained. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one.
Schlözer in his preparation for the Arabia expedition in 1781 coined the term Semitic language:
"From the Mediterranean to the Euphrates, from Mesopotamia to Arabia ruled one language, as is well known. Thus Syrians, Babylonians, Hebrews, and Arabs were one people (ein Volk). Phoenicians (Hamites) also spoke this language, which I would like to call the Semitic (die Semitische)." -Before Boas: The Genesis of Ethnography and Ethnology in the German By Han F. Vermeulen. He was only half right though, Arabic is the only corollary to "proto-semitic", infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical as will be shown.
"Semitic" is just mumbled Arabic, really. Imagine English with a third of its letters removed and simplified grammar. That's Aramaic, Hebrew, etc. For example, combine T and D into just T; there's no need to have 2 letters. The same goes for i, e, y - they should all be just y from now on, etc., etc. Arabic is the only corollary to proto-Semitic. In fact, the whole classification of Semitic languages is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning brain. Hebrew, Aramaic, and the rest of these made-up dialect continua only have 22 letters out of the 29 proto-Semitic letters. Arabic has all 29. The difference between Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as the difference between Latin and pig Latin or Italian. "Phoenician" is an Arabic dialect continuum, and not only that, it is pidgin. It is simplified to the point of stupidity. Anyone with a basic knowledge of Arabic would see this clearly. What happened was that Arabic handicapped "scholars" saw the equivalent of Scottish Twitter spelling, with added mumbling due to phonemic mergers (22 letters, not 29), and mistakenly thought they were seeing a different language."
"protosemetic" Alphabet (29), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22)
𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼
ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي
A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y
א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת
Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic:
ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain
س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining
ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining
ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining
ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining
ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining
protoS 29th is a س written in a different position, but was shoehorned to obfuscate.
This kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua. As a matter of fact, all of the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and their complexity was derived from the Qur'an. It was by analyzing the syntactic structure of the Qur'an that the Arabic root system was developed. This system was first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, which preceded the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years. It was through this development that the concept of Arabic roots was established and later co-opted into the term 'semitic root,' allowing the decipherment of ancient scripts. In essence, they quite literally copied and pasted the entirety of the Arabic root. Hebrew had been dead, as well as all the other dialects of Arabic, until being 'revived' in a Frankensteinian fashion in the 18th and 19th centuries. The entire region spoke basically the same language, with mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language gradually became more degenerate, and then the Qur'an appeared with the oldest possible form of the language thousands of years later. This is why the Arabs of that time were challenged to produce 10 similar verses, and they couldn't. People think it's a miracle because they couldn't do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself. They had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision. And when I say mathematical, I quite literally mean mathematical.
Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken?
The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study.real
God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
Human Authors write books which are eloquent, clearly-written and are highly organized and in chronological order.
Shame that cannot be said of the Arabic Qur'an, whose Author is supposed to be GOD.
And the Bible by comparison is a masterpiece. God used symbology all the way back in Exodous to illustrate Jesus being the lamb of God. And baptism too! The Isrealites walked through the red sea (water) that then separated them and destroyed Egypts armies (sin) just like being baptized separates us just like the Red Sea. While we still brought our sinful nature through the water (just like Isreal), we can now work to purify our hearts for God (like the law for Isreal).
Also continued symbol like Isreal being the fig tree gets references many times. Jesus references back to Noah and Sodom and Gamorah. Prophicies were fulfilled but more will be fulfilled when he returns because the Jewish leaders didn't consider that possibility (plot twist). It's just an amazing and real story that's been written in historical action over thousands of years
@@ranro7371 sorry mate, you copy pastes nonsensical babble. The Quran confirms the legitimacy of the Bible in its suras even though the Bible is both far more detailed in accounting of the events and written by eye witnesses to what occurred in most instances especially in the testimony of Jesus. So if Quran contradicts the Bible's 4 books writing about him from accounts of eye witnesses written by 2 followers, 1 secondary follower, and 1 historian, that has far greater legitimacy than a contradictory account written 600 years later in a book that both confirms the Bible is correct and contradicts it.
So the answer is to seek the truth and read the gospels that detail the life of Jesus and his teachings. These are recorded in the Bible in the books of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. This will clarify what the Quran has always been missing (to state it minimally).
@@ranro7371
All that copy/paste babble/nonsense doesn't do it for most of us.
We know the origins of the Qur'an and from where it came from, and who wrote it.
The Qur'an is NOT an original Divine Source, because it's teachings were plagiarised, copy/pasted from previously existing books (the Holy Bible) and teachings/traditions taken from other religions like Hinduism and Zoroastrianism. Also, the Qur'an teaches fantasy stories and legends copied from the Jews.
Your Allah doesn't have Divine knowledge or wisdom - if he did, he would not have texts copied and pasted from other previously existing sources.
Mohammad was NOT a prophet of God, and there already exists an abundance of proof for his life and teachings. He Died 200 years BEFORE the Qur'an was compiled and put together. He had No Eyewitnesses to Any of his claims, and No one heard or saw Anything about his original claims about himself. Even some of Mohammad's companions doubted his teachings, and left him. They knew he was Faking revelations (Wahi). You can go Research this for yourself.
You can see CIRA International and Dr Jay Smith, and several others Prove that your Qur'an is False and was written by humans, not GOD. They show it's origins and development from Islamic history as well.
Rob Christian speaks Aramaic and he can show you that your Allah is NOT the God of the Holy Bible, and the word "Alaha" is a mistranslation.
Our Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ, of the Holy Bible is not the same "Jesus" as your ISA in the Qur'an. Our Jesus is Far Superior in Divine Knowledge and Wisdom and is Eternal.
In comparison between the Bible and the Qur'an - the Holy Bible is a "Living" Miraculous Theological Masterpiece compared to a Children's Fairytale Book of Legends.
@@ranro7371 so prove it. The Quran is just someone who speaks human revelations as if they come from God as a matter of manipulation. The dead sea scrolls prove that the Bible and Torah have not been altered at least 2300 years. Just because a man said it and wrote it down, doesn't make it true on that alone. The Bible is a library of books written over more than a thousand years by over 60 authors to whom all recorded history or were spoken to by God. Islam has one prophet. Judaism has 48 spanning over centuries. And many of them died for their prophicying.
Seek God and it will all sort itself out. But that means you need to read the Bible or you can't say you've truly seeked. And no Christian or Jew is going to absorb all of your sins. Either you become a disciple of Jesus or you perish in the lake of fire. No amount of self righteousness can save you. So brother, I encourage you to seek. Just seek honestly and the rest will come.
@@ranro7371
You can babble and yak forever. We all know and have Proof that your Qur'an is NOT from God, and it's a copy/edit/paste work from previously existing sources - whether you like it or not. You can't change those Facts, so you will live in delusions and Lies for the rest of your life, if you choose to do so.
Biographies of Mohammad's life and teachings bear Witness to his Evil and Ungodly behaviour, and his mentally-deranged state of mind.
There were times when Mohammad submitted himself in Idolatry, while still claiming to be a Prophet.
Sorry dear! Your efforts to defend your fake prophet and your stone moon-god Allah, have proven to be useless.
Qur'an is a man-written book, and nothing within it shows the Divine Love of the True God, and His work of Salvation for mankind from sins.
So I'll close with a thumbs down 👎 for this incoherent, disorganised book of Hatred, and Deceptive Lies, with no hope of Salvation to those who believe in it.
CASE CLOSED 🔐
The logical next step is for Wood to get his videos translated into Arabic. Then the Arabs would get a proper warning.
If he does that his ignorance will be exposed to all Arabs.
Just like in this video.
@@karimmezghiche9921 According to the (approved) hadith of Al-Bukhari, Mohammed is a pedophile (Aisha was nine). According to other hadith and Quranic verses, he is a slave-trader, adulterer and rapist of slave women, a torturer (cutting off opposite hands and feet, for example), and a slaughterer of hundreds (beheading Jews for wanting to remain Jews, for example). Tell me, please, why on earth would you want to follow the teachings of such a moral monster? Personally, I can't see how you can possibly justify it to yourself.
But do the arabs need another warner?
Or would they be open to another warner? Given that the last warner was "bad news" and lied about being the last warner?
@@karimmezghiche9921 Could you explain some of the arrogance?
AMEN!
EXCELLENT REASONING, ANAYSIS AND EXPLANATION.
THANK YOU.
THANK YOU FOR THIS VIDEO.
Basically, the Arabs could not be bothered to learn Hebrew, the language of their cousins, the Jews, to become monotheists and needed to have a book and prayers in their own language, but totally unrelated peoples are supposed to learn Arabic to be monotheists. Makes no sense!
I have listened to this post for the first time, am extremely impressed with the quality of your understanding, and knowledge of what you're tackling... God bless you David... I will be following.
Isn't it suspicious how Islam just happened to come into existence around the time when both the Byzantine and Parthian empires were exhausted from fighting each other and were ripe for conquest? All that was needed was a man (real or fictional) and idea (religion, holy book) to unite the Arabic tribes and galvanize them to attack their former overlords. Islam was founded as a pen-Semitic (Arab + Jew + Assyrian) empire to kick out the Indo-European Greeks and Persians from the Middle East and go on the offensive against them.
Finally someone who views Mohammed for what I understand him to be ...a prince who wanted to conquer but needed a unifying factor and chose to create his own religion scare a bunch of people ...I mean that was how for example emperor wu of han established a unified ideology he plucked all ideologies and unified them combining parts of original confucianism..legalists and other sects in china and finally got his own version of imperial confucianism
An old man married a 9 years old girl,
What the freaking shock about this Human,
What the freaking shock about this Human followers....
Thank you for what you do David.
I am an Agnostic, I found this is a fantastic clear explanation of the Muslims lies. Interesting. I cant wait for a Muslim counter video to this fantastic video. Good job in being clear calm and precise David.
MASSIVELY SHARE THIS VIDEO PLEASE; ON ALL PLATFORMS WITH MAJORITY MUSLIM PEOPLE, THEY MUST HEAR THE TRUTH & BE SAVED/FREED FROM THE GRIP OF EVIL/MOHAMMED
GOD BLESS YOU AS YOU DO
&
GOD BLESS YOU DAVID WOOD
Allah got 99 names but Father ain't one
I need to share this with my Swahili people.
A woman of Samaria came to draw water. Jesus said to her, “Give Me a drink.” 8For His disciples had gone away into the city to buy food.
9Then the woman of Samaria said to Him, “How is it that You, being a Jew, ask a drink from me, a Samaritan woman?” For Jews have no dealings with Samaritans.
10Jesus answered and said to her, “If you knew the gift of God, and who it is who says to you, ‘Give Me a drink,’ you would have asked Him, and He would have given you living water.”
11The woman said to Him, “Sir, You have nothing to draw with, and the well is deep. Where then do You get that living water? 12Are You greater than our father Jacob, who gave us the well, and drank from it himself, as well as his sons and his livestock?”
13Jesus answered and said to her, “Whoever drinks of this water will thirst again, 14but whoever drinks of the water that I shall give him will never thirst. But the water that I shall give him will become in him a fountain of water springing up into everlasting life.”
15The woman said to Him, “Sir, give me this water, that I may not thirst, nor come here to draw.”
16Jesus said to her, “Go, call your husband, and come here.”
17The woman answered and said, “I have no husband.”
Jesus said to her, “You have well said, ‘I have no husband,’ 18for you have had five husbands, and the one whom you now have is not your husband; in that you spoke truly.”
19The woman said to Him, “Sir, I perceive that You are a prophet. 20Our fathers worshiped on this mountain, and you Jews say that in Jerusalem is the place where one ought to worship.”
21Jesus said to her, “Woman, believe Me, the hour is coming when you will neither on this mountain, nor in Jerusalem, worship the Father. 22You worship what you do not know; we know what we worship, for salvation is of the Jews. 23But the hour is coming, and now is, when the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth; for the Father is seeking such to worship Him. 24God is Spirit, and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth.”
25The woman said to Him, “I know that Messiah is coming” (who is called Christ). “When He comes, He will tell us all things.”
26Jesus said to her, “I who speak to you am He.”
As Jesus makes perfectly clear in verse 22, salvation is of the JEWS, not of the Arabs; no apostle or prophet or messenger of God ever came from the Arabs, who were descended from Ishmael, the outcast, trouble making, accursed slave!