No. 8gb is simply not enough in 2024 and it will only get worse. For 400$ there is rx 7700xt, rx 6800 for even less and both are much faster than poor 4060ti with enough vram and both can be solid 1440p GPUs, unlike 4060ti that is stuck with 1080p with its narrow 128bit bus. Nvidia has nothing under 550$ and that is a big shame, AMD is not much better but they got something at least.
@@mbunayellow Bro i have rx 7800xt and play with same fps on 1440p like your 4060ti does at 1080p and it costs only 50$ more. I dont play Alan Wake, its super boring and dull game..
@@mbunayellow I'm glad you're enjoying your 4060 Ti. I'll be getting my hands on the 16GB version soon. I'm very much interested in trying it at 1440p as well as 4K👍
60fps had always been the goal people who say otherwise are just showing off and being an idiot then you will see the same fella playing with steam deck at 30fps like its the best new toy
*Whatever makes you happy. I bought an RTX 3080 when they dropped. $699 USD. Couldn't go wrong. The 4070 is a tiny bit slower in FPS performance in games.*
i notice in many new games the 4060 can no longer push 60fps, its always around 40+fps and the 4060ti can get you to that 60fps + frame gen all the way to 100fps
@@Cracygh-PF in many new high graphic titles the 4060 is only kicking 40ish fps and you can frame gen to 60fps with a little input lag, assuming it still had that extra vram to frame gen
@@loucipher7782 So you ultimately get what you pay for. Not the most outrageous NVidia release ever. Just about all I play is COD, so I like to ask questions about the high graphic titles when I can.
@@Cracygh-PF older games like COD dont matter you will get over 100fps anyway depending on cpu even without frame gen Newer and upcoming UE5 games will tank the 4060 down to 40fps on High preset. Alan Wake 2, Space Marine 2, Black Myth Wukong etc is all in the 40ish fps unless you drop the graphic quite a lot and aggressive dlss
It acutally does matter at 1080p. I couldn't play Farcry 6 with Hd Texture pack in 1080p on my 3070 because my fps went from 90 to 20-30 and textures don't affect performance at all. Also cyberpunk was unplayable in 1080p just because of 8 gb vram. The chip could do 70 fps with raytracing ultra but after 1-2 min it dropped to 20-30 fps because of vram. Same goes for Doom Eternal, Diablo 4 and many others. 8 gb is NOT enough for 1080p and hasn't been since 2021ish. Also 12 gb isn'T enough for 1440p that'S why i went for the 4070 ti super with 16 gb. And If I go for usage (not allocation) it uses about 11-12 gb in a lot of games. So you'd get stutters after some minutes again if you only had 12 gb of vram. Don't buy anything under 12 gb for 1080p and anything under 16 gb for 1440p.
@@williehrmann What were the readings without RT? Most of people who are looking at 8gb cards are the entry level buyers so RT performance probably doesn't bother them a great deal. Of course, if you're looking to buy anything midrange or above then absolutely steer clear of 8gb, but 3070 without RT shouldn't be putting up such lowly numbers when even a GTX 1060 with only 6gb of VRAM can do the job in Doom Eternal at around medium to high at 4k.
@@juuglord8509 Sadly I didn't test without RT. Because the only reason I upgraded from 1070 to 3070 was rt. And when I realized I couldn't play with rt I sold it and waited for 4070 ti Super to play games again. But I've read that Rt takes about 1-2 gb more VRam. So that could well be. But a 3070 is a high midrange card and should well be capable of playing max settings with raytracing at 1080p and it was if it wasn't for lacking vram. When I start the game I got 70 fps, after 1-2 mins it dropped to 20. Always when vram creeped up full. In Doom eternal I could play sometimes with 100 fps then it just dropped to 30 and wouldn'T go up after 10 mins. It went on like that for every game, Watchdogs Legion also. Hitman 3. Every game would run at high fps für some minutes and then drop. That's a clear indication of vram issues. In a 3050 this would be acceptable. But 1080 p is already the lowest acceptable resolution today and a 3070 is a midrange card (people even say 1440p, which would never work with 8 gb of VRam). It can'T be that nvidia releases a high midrange card with a lot of rt performance that cant even play it in 1080p. They should have broought the 3070 with 10 gb and the 3080 with 12 from the beginning and everything would be fine.
If you look at hardware unboxed, digital foundary, daniel owens, and pcworld reviews you can see that it really depends on the game. 8gb card for a game like Hogwart's Legacy, Last of US part 1, RE4 remake etc would work, just not well. Some parts of the game might stutter or have greatly reduced textures loaded in game. The game might be streaming muddy looking textures all day long. If you don't play a lot of 1st person, eye candy games or have huge mods installed, then I guess 8gb vram for 1080p makes sense. What I don't get is why settle for a 300 dollar 8gb card when a 360 dollar 16gb card exist? I would pick the 7600xt 16gb over a 4060ti any day of the week. Even for truly entry level I rather pick up a rtx3060 12gb over a 4060 8gb.
@@williehrmann Textures can affect performance if they are big enough. If you use a bunch of high resolution textures for example they will bog down your GPU despite having enough Vram to store them, So a powerful enough GPU with enough Vram is needed in those situations to get the better outcome.
@@kevincampbell989 I could see the rx 7600 xt 16gb choking on itself long before the vram is utilized because the memory bus is weak as all can get out.
@@kevincampbell989 I doubt that performance will be there for Ultra Settings, ill wager you'll be reducing settings which will reduce VRAM demand. But you have a fair point.
I can see the RTX 4060 in a media center or small form factor build. The pricing to performance of these GPU's leaves much to be desired. iVadim, Thanks for the extensive tests on these GPU's. Cheers!
Dlss 3.7 is now very good i can't tell much difference between dlss quality at 1080p and native 1080p.nvidia gpu owners should always use dlss quality at 1080p now i feel and Radeon gpu users should play at native 1080p because fsr looks bad at 1080p.
Yes you’re right, for AMD users though, I use xess 1.3 mod, it’s perfect, it’s at dlss level, I have both nvidia card and AMD, and the mod makes it look very similar to dlss 3.7
I really like how you do these reviews/head-to-heads of GPU's in sort of first person mode (a slap in the face to those who may call your gameplay/gpu's fake) and not simply screen-recorded with some afterburner overlay. Also, imo 4060ti 8gb will never be worth it until it goes below $329 average price (and around $379 for the 16gb version) that would mean around 249-279 max for the 4060 now those are somewhat good deals.
It's a shame that NVIDIA hasn't launched an updated and improved 4060 Ti SUPER 16GB for the price of the 4060 Ti 8GB. That would have been a decent card. But it seems that the current 4060 Ti sells well enough for the company not to care.
@@theivadim Yeah, they could have made a 4060 Ti Super with 4608 cores (full AD106), 16GB of 20Gbps GDDR6, a higher clock speed and a power target of 180W for $399 and it would have been a decent product.
No. If I wanted RT for my games, I would go straight for a 4070. Playing at 1080p with RT on might look good for some games. Playing at 1440p high textures would generally look better for most games with or without RT. In fact, I rather have a 4060 with 16gb vram instead of a 4060ti with 8gb or a 400usd 4060ti 16gb that gets within arm's reach of a rx 7700xt.
If we're talking about using a 27-inch monitor then I too think that 1440p is the way to go. Decent 1440p monitors cost only $20-40 more so there is no big price barrier like there was in the past. If only there was a cheaper 12-16GB NVIDIA card to enable more people to experience 1440p. Hopefully, that'll happen with arrival of RTX 50 or 60 series.
@@theivadim yes I can see your point, I where I live, the 1080p monitors are pretty much nonexistent at reasonable prices. All the monitors I see that are priced decently are at 1440p and 4k resolutions. I honestly wished the entry level cards are all 12gb, and the 70's level card 16gb. I hate that every time I think about upgrading to a 4k monitor, Crypto mining or AI boon gets in the way. At this rate, I might as well sit at 1440p forever.
That's just life🙂 It'll never be the perfect time. 1440p is a good resolution anyway. I've used a 1440p 27-inch Gigabyte M27Q monitor for years and it was a good experience. 1440p is the sweetspot. 4K is still a bit of a luxury. But surprisingly, this year there are some nice budget 4K options out there as well. I'm currently using a $380 32-inch 144Hz VA MSI G321CU monitor. It even has USB-C port for display connection with 15W power delivery for a laptop. Works great because I switch between my desktop PC and MacBook Air all the time. That's a lot of features for such a modest price.
The Gaming X are even more expensive, the 3-fan version can cost $550, last Christmas it cost me $500 for the 2-fan version of the MSI 4060 ti Gaming X full RGB
Thank you for this nice video, Some questions I have , if you can please tell me, What software you are using for testing and do you have a video to compare RX6900xt and Nvidia 3080 for Graphic design or performance in Game? ty indeed
Thanks!☺️ I use CapFrameX. It's the best. 6900 XT vs 3080 = unfortunately I don't have that and I've never touched these graphics cards so can't give you a good recommendation based on personal experience.
the rog strix 4060ti 16gb is by far the BEST performing 4060ti gpu atleast imp mine is currently not stock and its slightly oced and optimizations have been made cpu paired is a 5800x3d and 32gb 3000mhz gskill ram CL16
As long as they keep pushing driver support the arc a770 is the best bang for buck at the 300 price point. On the case of the 4060 I wouldn’t bother with the ti. You either go for the 4070 super or wait till next year when NVIDIA releases an entry level 50 series card.
It is wild how unpopular Intel GPUs are. I wonder how long it'll take them to shake the bad image they've earned. AMD is still battling with "AMD has bad drivers" stigma years later.🙂 Even though AMD's drivers are fine now.
@@theivadim my main reason to not buy an arc a770 is that the idle power draw is too high for me as electricity and summer heat are a bad combo here. I also want to play older games and Intel isn't prioritizing those older games from 2010s.
@@mluthfanfaohani just got my 16 GB rtx 4060 TI. dont listen to all the hate. its a great card. im using a 1440p monitor and all games ive been playing has been maxed settinggs. no problems no lag no stuttering. i got mine from pny. it might be a "golden" card but i have no problems at all. i also have a am5 mobo and cpu
I have 6750 XT, best £300 card imo....7800 XT more expensive than 4060 Ti 8GB but 7700 XT is the same price and has 12GB vram & is a better option, 8GB vram on a £400 card is insane!
3060 Ti was a solid choice as an "upper entry level" gaming card, IMO. 4060 and 4060 Ti are overpriced and underpowered. 4060 Ti 16GB is borderline silly - who needs 16 GB of VRAM on a card that's not particularly fast and only has a 128-bit memory-bus? You'll probably run into chip-limitations before you run into VRAM-limitations. 4060 = slower than 3060 Ti 4060 Ti 8 and 16Gb = both slower than 3070. Soo... if you can do without the updated Nvidia-tech of 40xx, might as well look for a good deal on a 2nd hand 3070 or 3070 Ti. Just for comparison: Memory bandwidth on the 4060 Ti = 288 GB/s, 3070 = 448 GB/s. Writing this in October 2024, I'd naturally advise to not purchase any GPU at the moment and wait for Nvidia and AMD next-gen cards, but if I had to choose, I'd ignore both these cards (and the 4060 Ti 16GB) and either go 2nd hand 30xx (as mentioned) or spend the extra 100, 120 bucks on the 4070. Yes: it "only" has 12 GB but unless you have a very specific need for more VRAM than that, the card delivers the kind of performance I would expect from a mid-/upper mid-tier gaming card. Plus its price has dropped since the introduction of the Super-cards and is now a little less outrageous. Kinda funny how Nvidia have shifted tiers and price points in their favor and now the friggin xx70s are almost mid-tier and basically what the xx60-cards used to be.
Honestly I wouldn't suggest buying a card until later on in the year for heavy discounts before the new cards release for next gen. Otherwise just buy a temporary used card for a couple hundred dollars and wait until than.
@@jasonvors1922 I'm upgrading from gtx 780. 4060ti is easily the best gpu at that price point. I can't spend anymore to get the 4070 like I would, and the 3070 is more expensive then the 4060ti also. Already waited a long to time buy a new PC. Not everyone can just keep waiting and it would be pointless to buy a temporary card rn then go through the hassle of reselling it and getting a new card in a few months... The 4060ti will last me 8 years just like the gtx 780 did.
@@SneakyBarkerThe 4060 Ti 8GB won’t last you 8 years. The 16GB variant would last you a lot longer than the 8GB version but then you’re getting close to the 4070 price. I’d save a few more months and go for a 4070 or 4070 Super. My daughter has a 3070 (2-3% faster than a 4060 Ti) and it plays everything at 1440p fine bar Fortnite where she runs that at 1080p to keep at a constant 120fps). It uses on average 6-7GB VRAM so not long left before it runs out. My son has the 4070 and that runs every game on high/ultra 1440p with ease. Problem you’ll get though is the better the card you get the better the CPU you will need. Minimum you want a AMD Ryzen 5 5600X/5700X or an Intel i5-12400F/12600K if you’re going on a DDR4 budget build.
@@papalazarou7880 i have an 15 14400 and 4060ti. It should last me 5 years before I need to upgrade hopefully. Atm I only play games on 1080p so I thought a 4070 would of just been complete overkill for me. If I was playing on 1440p I would of definitely spent the extra money to get a 4070. In 5 years time I'll be able to get a better gpu than a 4070 for the same price I would of paid for one now, and it would actually be needed. Whereas I don't need one now.
too expensive 4060ti is easily good enough will last me 5+ years, and if it starts not being able to run games properly i'll sell the card and upgrade to a better one when the prices are a lot better
The problem is, new GPU releases too fast, should be every 5-6 years because the real consumers buy GPU or PC is not every year, we use PC at least 6-8 years even for 10 years. I will stay with RX 6600 or I can just change to 3060 12GB if I need a higher VRAM.
Sure. Let's reduce the pace of all other technology improvements and innovations while we're at it. We're free to buy new or upgrade whenever it makes sense for us. I think that's enough.
1 . 4060 is not for playing the latest and greatest games . 4060 is medium - high gaming . best used at 1080p . 2 . 4060ti si better than 4060 . it has extra 20 fps and the extra 20 fps allow you to play all games at minimum 60 fps . 3 . 4060ti has no competition on power consumtion and new technology . 150w vs 250w Radeon/ Intel . 100w less = 100 dollars .
![[#2024MAMA] BIGBANG (빅뱅) - 뱅뱅뱅 (BANG BANG BANG) + FANTASTIC BABY | Mnet 241123 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EQsYfiPR9uM/mqdefault.jpg)
Do you think the 4060 Ti is worth the extra money?
No. 8gb is simply not enough in 2024 and it will only get worse. For 400$ there is rx 7700xt, rx 6800 for even less and both are much faster than poor 4060ti with enough vram and both can be solid 1440p GPUs, unlike 4060ti that is stuck with 1080p with its narrow 128bit bus. Nvidia has nothing under 550$ and that is a big shame, AMD is not much better but they got something at least.
Bro i have 4060ti 16gb i play alan wake 2 even at 4k around 40 fps. it is worth to buy 16gb version. greetings
@@mbunayellow Bro i have rx 7800xt and play with same fps on 1440p like your 4060ti does at 1080p and it costs only 50$ more. I dont play Alan Wake, its super boring and dull game..
Over priced for the 4060 Ti 8GB. £350 should get you the 16GB when ram is dirt cheap.
@@mbunayellow I'm glad you're enjoying your 4060 Ti. I'll be getting my hands on the 16GB version soon. I'm very much interested in trying it at 1440p as well as 4K👍
he says "but i call this playable" when did 79fps become "just playable" 60fps was the goal not long ago
60fps had always been the goal
people who say otherwise are just showing off and being an idiot
then you will see the same fella playing with steam deck at 30fps like its the best new toy
It’s 2024 that’s why, 60 fps is fine but if you can afford a $300 gpu more is definitely the target
@@loucipher7782that’s because 30fps on the go is better than no fps because you can’t play at all
He meant it because of the micro stutters in the frametime bro. Not because of the FPS.
*Whatever makes you happy. I bought an RTX 3080 when they dropped. $699 USD. Couldn't go wrong. The 4070 is a tiny bit slower in FPS performance in games.*
i notice in many new games the 4060 can no longer push 60fps, its always around 40+fps and the 4060ti can get you to that 60fps + frame gen all the way to 100fps
Can it push 60fps with frame-gen or is that native, and what resolution?
@@Cracygh-PF in many new high graphic titles the 4060 is only kicking 40ish fps and you can frame gen to 60fps with a little input lag, assuming it still had that extra vram to frame gen
@@loucipher7782 So you ultimately get what you pay for. Not the most outrageous NVidia release ever.
Just about all I play is COD, so I like to ask questions about the high graphic titles when I can.
@@Cracygh-PF older games like COD dont matter you will get over 100fps anyway depending on cpu even without frame gen
Newer and upcoming UE5 games will tank the 4060 down to 40fps on High preset. Alan Wake 2, Space Marine 2, Black Myth Wukong etc is all in the 40ish fps unless you drop the graphic quite a lot and aggressive dlss
@@loucipher7782 Thanks for the info.
i5 12400f + rtx 4060 good combo for 1080p gaming in 2024
in 1080p vram doesn't matter, but in modern and future games 1440p 4k vram matters specially in game stability no wild swings of fps 1% low
It acutally does matter at 1080p. I couldn't play Farcry 6 with Hd Texture pack in 1080p on my 3070 because my fps went from 90 to 20-30 and textures don't affect performance at all. Also cyberpunk was unplayable in 1080p just because of 8 gb vram. The chip could do 70 fps with raytracing ultra but after 1-2 min it dropped to 20-30 fps because of vram. Same goes for Doom Eternal, Diablo 4 and many others. 8 gb is NOT enough for 1080p and hasn't been since 2021ish. Also 12 gb isn'T enough for 1440p that'S why i went for the 4070 ti super with 16 gb. And If I go for usage (not allocation) it uses about 11-12 gb in a lot of games. So you'd get stutters after some minutes again if you only had 12 gb of vram. Don't buy anything under 12 gb for 1080p and anything under 16 gb for 1440p.
@@williehrmann What were the readings without RT? Most of people who are looking at 8gb cards are the entry level buyers so RT performance probably doesn't bother them a great deal. Of course, if you're looking to buy anything midrange or above then absolutely steer clear of 8gb, but 3070 without RT shouldn't be putting up such lowly numbers when even a GTX 1060 with only 6gb of VRAM can do the job in Doom Eternal at around medium to high at 4k.
@@juuglord8509 Sadly I didn't test without RT. Because the only reason I upgraded from 1070 to 3070 was rt. And when I realized I couldn't play with rt I sold it and waited for 4070 ti Super to play games again. But I've read that Rt takes about 1-2 gb more VRam. So that could well be. But a 3070 is a high midrange card and should well be capable of playing max settings with raytracing at 1080p and it was if it wasn't for lacking vram. When I start the game I got 70 fps, after 1-2 mins it dropped to 20. Always when vram creeped up full. In Doom eternal I could play sometimes with 100 fps then it just dropped to 30 and wouldn'T go up after 10 mins. It went on like that for every game, Watchdogs Legion also. Hitman 3. Every game would run at high fps für some minutes and then drop. That's a clear indication of vram issues. In a 3050 this would be acceptable. But 1080 p is already the lowest acceptable resolution today and a 3070 is a midrange card (people even say 1440p, which would never work with 8 gb of VRam). It can'T be that nvidia releases a high midrange card with a lot of rt performance that cant even play it in 1080p. They should have broought the 3070 with 10 gb and the 3080 with 12 from the beginning and everything would be fine.
If you look at hardware unboxed, digital foundary, daniel owens, and pcworld reviews you can see that it really depends on the game. 8gb card for a game like Hogwart's Legacy, Last of US part 1, RE4 remake etc would work, just not well. Some parts of the game might stutter or have greatly reduced textures loaded in game. The game might be streaming muddy looking textures all day long. If you don't play a lot of 1st person, eye candy games or have huge mods installed, then I guess 8gb vram for 1080p makes sense. What I don't get is why settle for a 300 dollar 8gb card when a 360 dollar 16gb card exist? I would pick the 7600xt 16gb over a 4060ti any day of the week. Even for truly entry level I rather pick up a rtx3060 12gb over a 4060 8gb.
@@williehrmann Textures can affect performance if they are big enough. If you use a bunch of high resolution textures for example they will bog down your GPU despite having enough Vram to store them, So a powerful enough GPU with enough Vram is needed in those situations to get the better outcome.
3060 Ti vs 3060 was worth it, the extra horsepower overshadows the VRAM decrease, 4060ti 16gb is a cash grab.
Same with the rx 7600 xt 16gb
It's a cash grab in 2024. But 2-3 years from now you'll be grateful for that extra vram.
@@kevincampbell989 I could see the rx 7600 xt 16gb choking on itself long before the vram is utilized because the memory bus is weak as all can get out.
@@kevincampbell989 I doubt that performance will be there for Ultra Settings, ill wager you'll be reducing settings which will reduce VRAM demand. But you have a fair point.
@@AKMcF😂😂 okay whatever
I can see the RTX 4060 in a media center or small form factor build. The pricing to performance of these GPU's leaves much to be desired. iVadim, Thanks for the extensive tests on these GPU's. Cheers!
It's been my pleasure🙂 Thanks for your continuous support!🤝
Dlss 3.7 is now very good i can't tell much difference between dlss quality at 1080p and native 1080p.nvidia gpu owners should always use dlss quality at 1080p now i feel and Radeon gpu users should play at native 1080p because fsr looks bad at 1080p.
Yes you’re right, for AMD users though, I use xess 1.3 mod, it’s perfect, it’s at dlss level, I have both nvidia card and AMD, and the mod makes it look very similar to dlss 3.7
@@Kitkat-wf2pu xess is blurry af and it runs way slower on amd cards.
@@Scott99259 lol have you seen fsr,
love the first person view keep it up
Awesome! I appreciate the feedback and thanks for watching!🤝🙂
I really like how you do these reviews/head-to-heads of GPU's in sort of first person mode (a slap in the face to those who may call your gameplay/gpu's fake) and not simply screen-recorded with some afterburner overlay.
Also, imo 4060ti 8gb will never be worth it until it goes below $329 average price (and around $379 for the 16gb version) that would mean around 249-279 max for the 4060 now those are somewhat good deals.
It's a shame that NVIDIA hasn't launched an updated and improved 4060 Ti SUPER 16GB for the price of the 4060 Ti 8GB. That would have been a decent card. But it seems that the current 4060 Ti sells well enough for the company not to care.
And thanks for your kind feedback! I appreciate you watching my videos🤝🙂
@@theivadim Yeah, they could have made a 4060 Ti Super with 4608 cores (full AD106), 16GB of 20Gbps GDDR6, a higher clock speed and a power target of 180W for $399 and it would have been a decent product.
No. If I wanted RT for my games, I would go straight for a 4070. Playing at 1080p with RT on might look good for some games. Playing at 1440p high textures would generally look better for most games with or without RT. In fact, I rather have a 4060 with 16gb vram instead of a 4060ti with 8gb or a 400usd 4060ti 16gb that gets within arm's reach of a rx 7700xt.
If we're talking about using a 27-inch monitor then I too think that 1440p is the way to go. Decent 1440p monitors cost only $20-40 more so there is no big price barrier like there was in the past. If only there was a cheaper 12-16GB NVIDIA card to enable more people to experience 1440p. Hopefully, that'll happen with arrival of RTX 50 or 60 series.
@@theivadim yes I can see your point, I where I live, the 1080p monitors are pretty much nonexistent at reasonable prices. All the monitors I see that are priced decently are at 1440p and 4k resolutions. I honestly wished the entry level cards are all 12gb, and the 70's level card 16gb. I hate that every time I think about upgrading to a 4k monitor, Crypto mining or AI boon gets in the way. At this rate, I might as well sit at 1440p forever.
That's just life🙂 It'll never be the perfect time. 1440p is a good resolution anyway. I've used a 1440p 27-inch Gigabyte M27Q monitor for years and it was a good experience. 1440p is the sweetspot. 4K is still a bit of a luxury. But surprisingly, this year there are some nice budget 4K options out there as well. I'm currently using a $380 32-inch 144Hz VA MSI G321CU monitor. It even has USB-C port for display connection with 15W power delivery for a laptop. Works great because I switch between my desktop PC and MacBook Air all the time. That's a lot of features for such a modest price.
is it really $400 USD for a 4060ti over there??? i have one on the way right now and i payed $550 aud (337.55 Euro, 366.46 USD) for it
The Gaming X are even more expensive, the 3-fan version can cost $550, last Christmas it cost me $500 for the 2-fan version of the MSI 4060 ti Gaming X full RGB
Thank you for this nice video, Some questions I have , if you can please tell me, What software you are using for testing and do you have a video to compare RX6900xt and Nvidia 3080 for Graphic design or performance in Game? ty indeed
Thanks!☺️ I use CapFrameX. It's the best. 6900 XT vs 3080 = unfortunately I don't have that and I've never touched these graphics cards so can't give you a good recommendation based on personal experience.
the rog strix 4060ti 16gb is by far the BEST performing 4060ti gpu atleast imp mine is currently not stock and its slightly oced and optimizations have been made cpu paired is a 5800x3d and 32gb 3000mhz gskill ram CL16
Ram sweet spot is 3200mhz or 3600mhz 💪
That gpu is heavily overpriced though it retails for $559 when i can just get the MSI for $449. Asus charging you extra for aesthetics
@@efrainSRT in Canada its extremely expensive tryna get gpus but i got lucky 💀
As long as they keep pushing driver support the arc a770 is the best bang for buck at the 300 price point.
On the case of the 4060 I wouldn’t bother with the ti. You either go for the 4070 super or wait till next year when NVIDIA releases an entry level 50 series card.
It is wild how unpopular Intel GPUs are. I wonder how long it'll take them to shake the bad image they've earned. AMD is still battling with "AMD has bad drivers" stigma years later.🙂 Even though AMD's drivers are fine now.
@@theivadim my main reason to not buy an arc a770 is that the idle power draw is too high for me as electricity and summer heat are a bad combo here. I also want to play older games and Intel isn't prioritizing those older games from 2010s.
Almost £400 for an 8GB GPU is nuts though...
You're better off going with a 7700 XT for that price or even a 6800. I have 6750 XT, only cost me £300.
You have RX 6750 XT 12GB and ray tracing performance at frog's knee.
thats so sad damn , i could get a 4060 cheaper 50 usd than 7600 xt
hello Vadim what you think better to buy msi gaming X trio or gaming x slim 4060ti both 3x fan
Hi! I don't think you'll notice any difference. Both coolers are good. I'd pick the cheaper one.
Thanks for this video, helped me decide.
Glad to hear it!
Even on a 16 GB card does it still load assets to the dram or is everything kept on vram?
16GB is a good amount of video memory to have. I've not had any issues in any games while using a 16GB card even at 4K.
Hi, what case is that? I really like it
Cyberpower PRISM. I couldn't find it sold separately. I think it's an exclusive.
i'm using Nvidia 1060 right now, should i wait for 5060 or quick grab 4060? But how much will it be for 5060?
You should wait, RTX 4060 now can barely play at 1080p high setting in game
@@marci9717 whats your expectation on RTX5060, because i was suppose to buy Zotac 4060. Its cheaper than the other brands. Anyway, thanks for reply.
I have rx 6700 xt and 1440p ultrawide monitor, i will buy rtx 4060ti 16gb because i need dlss 3 and frame generation
buy asap, i want to know wht u feel after replace ur gpu
So with the rx 6700xt amds frame generation doesn't work? Strange.
@@mluthfanfaohani just got my 16 GB rtx 4060 TI. dont listen to all the hate. its a great card. im using a 1440p monitor and all games ive been playing has been maxed settinggs. no problems no lag no stuttering. i got mine from pny. it might be a "golden" card but i have no problems at all. i also have a am5 mobo and cpu
@nasyaramadhana6788
how long did you had the 6700 xt and how was it?
i'm lookin to buy a gpu
Yeah the only problem is if your upgrading to the RTX 4060 Ti 16gb version your paying like 200 bucks more.
Get AMD Rx 7800xt for the same money of 4060ti or Rx 6750xt instead of Rtx 4060
I have 6750 XT, best £300 card imo....7800 XT more expensive than 4060 Ti 8GB but 7700 XT is the same price and has 12GB vram & is a better option, 8GB vram on a £400 card is insane!
RTX 4060 Ti 8Gb vs RX 7800 XT please! 😃😃😃
3060 Ti was a solid choice as an "upper entry level" gaming card, IMO. 4060 and 4060 Ti are overpriced and underpowered. 4060 Ti 16GB is borderline silly - who needs 16 GB of VRAM on a card that's not particularly fast and only has a 128-bit memory-bus? You'll probably run into chip-limitations before you run into VRAM-limitations.
4060 = slower than 3060 Ti
4060 Ti 8 and 16Gb = both slower than 3070.
Soo... if you can do without the updated Nvidia-tech of 40xx, might as well look for a good deal on a 2nd hand 3070 or 3070 Ti. Just for comparison: Memory bandwidth on the 4060 Ti = 288 GB/s, 3070 = 448 GB/s.
Writing this in October 2024, I'd naturally advise to not purchase any GPU at the moment and wait for Nvidia and AMD next-gen cards, but if I had to choose, I'd ignore both these cards (and the 4060 Ti 16GB) and either go 2nd hand 30xx (as mentioned) or spend the extra 100, 120 bucks on the 4070. Yes: it "only" has 12 GB but unless you have a very specific need for more VRAM than that, the card delivers the kind of performance I would expect from a mid-/upper mid-tier gaming card. Plus its price has dropped since the introduction of the Super-cards and is now a little less outrageous. Kinda funny how Nvidia have shifted tiers and price points in their favor and now the friggin xx70s are almost mid-tier and basically what the xx60-cards used to be.
Wow I love your channel! amazing content love the camera angle in 1Person
I appreciate your kind words🙂 I'm glad you're enjoying the videos.
here in my country
$330 - 4060
$475 - 4060ti
I would rather save the money to upgrade to an ultra wide monitor
I think i don't recommending anything bellow of a RTX 4070 / 4070 Super in 2024 and beyond.
Honestly I wouldn't suggest buying a card until later on in the year for heavy discounts before the new cards release for next gen.
Otherwise just buy a temporary used card for a couple hundred dollars and wait until than.
Indeed, it is difficult to recommend these 60-class cards knowing that it's highly likely that they'll be obsolete in 1-2 years.
@@jasonvors1922
I'm upgrading from gtx 780. 4060ti is easily the best gpu at that price point. I can't spend anymore to get the 4070 like I would, and the 3070 is more expensive then the 4060ti also. Already waited a long to time buy a new PC. Not everyone can just keep waiting and it would be pointless to buy a temporary card rn then go through the hassle of reselling it and getting a new card in a few months... The 4060ti will last me 8 years just like the gtx 780 did.
@@SneakyBarkerThe 4060 Ti 8GB won’t last you 8 years. The 16GB variant would last you a lot longer than the 8GB version but then you’re getting close to the 4070 price. I’d save a few more months and go for a 4070 or 4070 Super. My daughter has a 3070 (2-3% faster than a 4060 Ti) and it plays everything at 1440p fine bar Fortnite where she runs that at 1080p to keep at a constant 120fps). It uses on average 6-7GB VRAM so not long left before it runs out. My son has the 4070 and that runs every game on high/ultra 1440p with ease. Problem you’ll get though is the better the card you get the better the CPU you will need. Minimum you want a AMD Ryzen 5 5600X/5700X or an Intel i5-12400F/12600K if you’re going on a DDR4 budget build.
@@papalazarou7880 i have an 15 14400 and 4060ti. It should last me 5 years before I need to upgrade hopefully. Atm I only play games on 1080p so I thought a 4070 would of just been complete overkill for me. If I was playing on 1440p I would of definitely spent the extra money to get a 4070. In 5 years time I'll be able to get a better gpu than a 4070 for the same price I would of paid for one now, and it would actually be needed. Whereas I don't need one now.
390 $ ? OMG. Here, same card is 530 EU. So if i can found tht price, i deffinitly buy it. Dont be arrogant, be happy of your price.
Anything below 4070 super/7900 GRE is pointless these days. Upscaling at 1080p is dumb. That's my take.
too expensive 4060ti is easily good enough will last me 5+ years, and if it starts not being able to run
games properly i'll sell the card and upgrade to a better one when the prices are a lot better
The problem is, new GPU releases too fast, should be every 5-6 years because the real consumers buy GPU or PC is not every year, we use PC at least 6-8 years even for 10 years.
I will stay with RX 6600 or I can just change to 3060 12GB if I need a higher VRAM.
Sure. Let's reduce the pace of all other technology improvements and innovations while we're at it.
We're free to buy new or upgrade whenever it makes sense for us. I think that's enough.
at the beginning of this video, you should say those interested in the answer go to the conclusion, thtat's what I did. Thanks.
Meanwhile Boris next door: "Vadim blyat!"
1 . 4060 is not for playing the latest and greatest games . 4060 is medium - high gaming . best used at 1080p .
2 . 4060ti si better than 4060 . it has extra 20 fps and the extra 20 fps allow you to play all games at minimum 60 fps .
3 . 4060ti has no competition on power consumtion and new technology . 150w vs 250w Radeon/ Intel . 100w less = 100 dollars .
One fan cards are tiny haha
Even 4060 is overkill for games 😮
I love your accent
Nice🙂
Rx 6700 xt
I wouldn't suggest buying a new rx 6700xt when you can buy the rx 6750xt new for around the same price for a superior card.
@@jasonvors1922 sure
i buy used much nice too