When you look at megalithic structures you cannot conclude the people that built them were dumber than we are today. And therefore, you can't conclude they were made naturally over the process of millions of years, because their architecture was extremely complex. The more complex something is, the higher the chance it was created by a designer and the lesser chance that it was randomly generated overtime.
As attested by Gen 11:6-8 And the Lord said, indeed the people are one and they all have one language, and this is what they begin to do; now nothing will be withheld from them. (8) So the Lord scattered them abroad from there over the face of the earth... The evidence of this is the megalithic structures all over the world. YT: Examples of Ancient Megalithic Technology Around the World and The World's Most Enormous Ancient Megaliths, Yangshan Quarry China. Baalbek Lebanon
No scientist today will tell you that ancient man wasn’t smart these people love to use outdated information to try to prove their point that has already been disproven time and time again
@@Gek1177 What? It means they were more unsophisticated, primitive, neanderthal types? Not possibly evidence for being created, genetically, physically and intellectually very good. Still early in the stages of accumulating genetic, adverse mutations, the loss of information.
@@JB-yb4wn God created the processes that dogs use. If evolution is true, how would animals even excrete waste? Evolution has so many problems with it and holes in it, its not even funny.
Obviously!!! After all, those useless organs in the human body that do literally nothing and hog resources are totally beautiful and god-given, and obviously NOT the process of random mutations and natural selection. That would be silly!! 😉
Pastor Bob Enyart of Denver Bible Church took a few people to Mount Saint Helens shortly after it blew up. He was able to bring back some things like Pumas, and other rocks from the site in a Gorge around the Mount Saint Helens site. He decided to take some of the rocks and send them to Laboratories to find out when they were formed. Now when one laboratory comes up with their answers on when they were formed, they carefully repackage the rocks and send them to four other Laboratories to see if their results are synonymous. When this was all said and done those rocks came back to the original laboratory that Bob took them to. When Bob talked to the scientist he originally gave the rocks to, he asked him, so how old are these rocks? When were they formed? The scientist said all the data from all the Laboratories State they were formed millions of years ago give or take a few million years. Then the scientists asked Bob where did you get these rocks? Bob said at Mount Saint Helens about 2 weeks ago! It left those evolutionary scientists absolutely speechless.
@@isaiahkelly9608 and you broke the 9th commandment with that story. It’s creationist propaganda. In reality the creationists did faulty research themselves using k-ar dating which was the equivalent of using a meat thermometer to measure how tall a person is.
FYI a change of state from liquid to solid does NOT change the "age" of the material. OBVIOUSLY. Think of water and ice in your refrigerator and glass at dinner.
Richard was entertaining the idea of how a god would have probably made life & where to look for that evidence if his hypothesis was the case. Not that he believes that to be the case.
The grand proud is the one who thought he could choose the true God, but the fact that it is impossible - just to choose a kind of fresh leefygreens sometimes you couldn't do it the right way. The truth is that if you choose the right God, it is because He had first chosen you. That is the true christian, a very humble person who wants to share the word of God the Trinity.
@@tone9358 Yeah that's the only issue I have with this video, they wherent interpreting that argument correctly. Its sort of a "well even if we did find a signature, that doesnt mean it was God it could be some other hypothetical intelligent race" Which, in my opinion doesnt really address the question, but yeah. The point he was making didnt imply his own belief in this concept, it was just taking the hypothetical and raising an argument against it.
@@tone9358 and yet had no other explanation. Could have been and yet no other explanation seems possible. If there were a naturalistic explanation for it he would have said that, instead of saying what he did. When asked specifically how it could happen that was the only answer he came up with. Makes one wonder.
@@zerosteel0123he was answering a hypothetical question. He doesn’t believe aliens made humans. Also that question that was asked to him where he pauses is cut very deceptively. He obviously didn’t just sit there dumbfounded. They cut it like that to make it seem like he doesn’t know what he’s talking about. He has a PhD in biology. He knows what he’s talking about
We were created to be instruments of worship and praise to our Creator. It took me almost 50 years to realize that. Thank you God and the book of Romans for the deep spiritual conviction! The first half of my life was serving myself, the second half is serving the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
“instrument of worship” So your God is just selfish like a monster, he created minions or slaves to serve him? I can’t believe this is said by people who say they love their God and still got agreement in the comments. Unbelievable.
"This is so awesome thank you for supporting my cognitive biases, I really needed someone to tell me exactly what I wanted to hear instead of facts and the truth! God bless echo chambers!!!"
@@newcreationinchrist1423 Evilutionists: "You Creationists don't know science! We do! However, we could not empirically prove the 'Missing Link,' so we dropped that like a hot potato! Now, we have the 'common ancestor.' However, again, we can't prove it empirically, so we'll be dropping that, too! We will make up the next one and call it, OONGALA-COONGALA-BOONGALA-WOO! Try and debunk that!"
@@newcreationinchrist1423 Thanks you for confirming that your world view is artificially programmed. Indoctrination via fear and group control "Cult behaviour" is a sad place to find yourself. Perhaps one day you will read your second book, and start to build an appreciation for the world around you? ? Nah, lets be honest... You haven't read your first book yet as the fastest way to the truth is to read the bible without your thumb up your bum and your brain in neutral. It is easy... You read a page then you simply say to yourself, does that sound reasonable or is it total hogwash!!!
All the early christians were well versed in even older Middle Eastern folklore and mythology, which included flood stories. That massive catastrophic floods occurred (and still occur) is beyond dispute. A really bad one in the misty dawn of human civilization would certainly have created a traumatic impact great enough for the event to be memorialized in the local lore. But still there is no evidence of a worldwide flood event.
Everything I have learned says yes their was a wordlwide flood. Water in different sediments of rock, shells and fish bones found on high mountains that are inland. A variety of people from different civilizations have reported a flood as well.
@@fatmayo2293 That's just wishful believing, you were raised with that myth, and so you PREFER to believe the other believers who are actually NOT real scientists and lifelong experts in Geology, ALL of which REAL Geologists will tell you exactly the same evidence that proves it never happened. I am a scientist, a physicist, electronic engineer, computer designer, and an Evolutionary genetics programmer. I hate to see you being scammed by these brainwashed religion nuts and liars! That myth comes from previous local empires who had similar children's fables from which the Noah myth was itself stolen. The story of Gilgamesh, and the story of Utna Pishtim before it are the ancestors of the Noah/Ark/Flood story, all with different gods and differing explanations, going back three thousannd years, we have then on clay tablets written in cunieform with a wedge stylus! Such are found in ancient collections of popular children's stories, they are not holy or magically true! The jews simply stole it to twist into their torah the way THEY wanted it!! If you don't have much in your holy book, then you grab stuff to fill it out so people will believe in it!!
@@fatmayo2293 People have been reporting floods for as long as there have been people and floods. Floods are so widespread that it would be surprising that memories of a particularly catastrophic one would not have formed part of the collective mythic memory of every human group on the planet. Water has been found in aquifers all over the planet, possible evidence for floods at one time or another, or for surface water seeping into underground spaces. We now know, as our ancient ancestors did not, that geologic uplift is responsible for places once deep underwater are now dry plains or even mountains. My part of the Midwest was once a sea, and labeled in my youth (the 50s) as The Great Inland Sea. Sorry, no evidence for a single world-wide flood. And actually considerable evidence for NO worldwide flood: in northeast Nebraska there is a site called Ashfall Fossil Beds State Historical Park. Fossils here from 12,000,000 years ago show no signs of ever having been flooded. Deep underground caves in Europe (Lascaux, Altamira) have never been flooded and had their wall art from 25,000 to 40,000 years ago damaged.
The petrification process is done by removing the organic matter while preserving the and hardening the cell casing, this was done chemically to speed up the process but naturally it would take a while.
@Who_IsLike_God exactly. And we use that value reliably time and again to make predictions such as where to find oil, fossils etc. One of the scientific tests of a theory is its ability to make verifiable novel predictions.
@Who_IsLike_God it's not scientists that won't change. Theories such as evolution and the big bang were very controversial and met with a lot of resistance. Eventually the weight of evidence shifts people's opinions. It's creationists who start with the answer and try to make the facts fit. There is a massive amount of evidence for evolution. So much bigger than the fossil record. Finding anomalies is what science deals with all the time. Theories are constantly revised. But the basic premise of random mutation plus natural selection has proved bullet proof for a long time
Funny, when they drill they find hundreds of meters of sedimentary rock layers filled with billions of dead things and find coal, oil and natural gas still having carbon 14 in it when the secular time says there should be none.
The scientific understanding of genomics has greatly expanded in the last 10 years and destroys the theory of evolution Holding to the myth of evolution is now embarrassing Teaching evolution in our schools and Universities is like still teaching a Flat Earth
I'm confused, what does John 14;9 have to do with the comment or the video? Not trying to offend you, I just don't know if you made a mistake of which verse you wanted to quote.
Yes, evidence that volcanoes exist, and sometimes erupt. So now we have definitive, god-given proof of evolution: Ashfall Fossil Beds State Historical Park in northeast Nebraska is where they found whole flocks of several now-extinct species of animals who were buried by ash from a volcanic eruption 12,000,000 years ago. All of these animals are ancestors of animals alive today. Hallelujah!!! Amen.
@@rstevewarmorycom Especially hard with the people who lie to themselves. They are so indoctrinated by the bible-thumping part of their upbringing that they become unaware of the terrible contortions they must undergo to reject one part of modern science while blithely accepting most others, some, like medicine and crop production, heavily based on evolution.
Even with DNA you still might not have life. Life is not a thing of chance, but a gift from somewhere out of the world we are familiar with, because of the Love of the gift Giver.
@@nyxculp9290 Well let's see. Oh I see that the Earth was created before the universe, well that's a lie. Night and day was created before the sun, well that's a lie. There is supposed to be a dome separating the waters, well that's a lie. Plants were created before anything else, well that's a lie. Stars were created after the Earth, well that's a lie. The moon is a night light, the moon reflects the sun's rays, so that's a lie. So you want me to learn how to lie like a theist?
Nice recommendation, I enjoyed that series. I missed out watching it when he first posted it as I was deeply indoctrinated into charismatic Christianity and avoided him like the plague but now that I’ve gone through several deconstructions I watch everything he posts same goes for gutsick gibbon.
@@barryblackwood6050 It didn’t happen, and there is evidence against it - I guess that’s the idea… In fact saying there is evidence against it is an understatement. Any knowledge of world history paired with common sense very quickly reveals the absurd impossibility.
@@barryblackwood6050are you saying that opened your eyes to the fact genesis is myth? Or that it opened your eyes that it’s not? Either way how does that work? It doesn’t make sense.
I enjoy looking at these comments. It really shows how people can think differently and not understand what others can understand so well. Listen... It takes more than just the Bible to understand God. It takes a Church, a strong spiritual community, and most importantly a priest that stands with the very first traditions of Christ and Holiness. I come from a Catholic background, but didn't understand God much at all, however I am learning more and more about it all as I am now aspiring into Greek Eastern Christian Orthodoxy. It takes more than words for someone to understand. It takes time, patience, and courage. For the atheist, believe what you want, just don't call us foolish for wanting to believe that we were meant to have a purpose. For Christians, stay strong. Our Lord will come serve our hearts justice at the time of the Second Resurrection, whenever that time may be. Follow Christ with all your heart, do not be afraid of the fallen world of which has tainted our hearts with fear, anger, and hatred. And most importantly, pray for the ones who have gone against us. Lord have mercy.
See, when you say "for the atheist, believe what you want", is missing the point. The point is that atheists don't really believe anything. They find the evidence for any kind of god completely wanting. So it leaves us with a lot of unanswered questions.
@@nathancook2852Yeh well----the Catholic religion is a False Religion! True Christians NEVER committed the atrocities that the RCC committed! And Almighty GOD will GIVE understanding to anyone who Comes humbly before HIM. You do not know the Bible, or its Power-----Therefore, you are not qualified to speak against It. Respectfully.
It breaks my heart that young people in public schools don’t get to hear this and at least have the option to decide creation or evolution. Instead they are taught today they have a choice to be male or female.
I had a friend at Fort Polk, LA that said he was on earthen dam and the water was right at the top of the dam. He dragged a stick across the dam to form a trickle of water. He went on playing. Before the day was over his little atream had drained the pond . Think what would happen on a larger scale. Think about this high pressure water can cut steel.
Do you realize how unbelievable that is? Just like everything in this video, and the Bible on top of that, this comment is completely untrue with no evidence to back it up, is poorly written, and only a fool would believe it.
Flowing water can move earth quickly. Flowing water carrying rocks can cut slowly through solid granite, Water at industrially high pressure can cut steel. Over millions of years, flowing water can carve a canyon.
@@judyswiderski2682 I don't know anything about Mt Helena. Mount St Helens is a volcano and I have no idea what connection it has to the short- and long-term effects of water on rock.
@@stevepierce6467 I just saw a video on it and others had not. There are two videos called Mt St Helena and the other Four Lessons From the Mount St. Helena Eruption. There are amazing things around it. Thank you for asking.
More like “BOO!! 10 dumbs down!” This guy thinks he knows more about science then every scientist who studies it, and it’s depressing that nearly everyone in these comments believes him
Very well taught. I learned something. It's lovely..thank you All. For helping us understand the Bible so much better. God bless the staff of this channel 🙏❤
You're better off learning from actual working scientists. Maybe Francis Collins. He is an evangelical Christian. He was also head of the human genome project. They decoded the human genome, actually looked inside it. Collins said what he saw in there was that our ancestry is not human, and we share it with the rest of life. Collins is a geneticist. Is Ham? Do you think Ham and his colleagues have looked inside the human genome? Do you think they know more than Collins?
@@JohnnieParker-u7b So what? It is a metaphor. And seeing as you don't know how to punctuate, you're not likely to grasp that, either. You've not countered the evidence the human genome project confirmed.
People have free will and unfortunately not everyone will agree on everything. Prayers for those hard hearted💔 people who will ignore all of the signs that God their creator is giving them. 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Ah yes, like the dozens of different signs he has given us that the Earth is 4.5 billion years old? Because those signs totally point towards creationism, yeah yeah sure.
@@KGrace0001 Radioactive dating is the main method scientists use. Also, if we're talking about the entire universe, not just our planet, we know it's billions of years old for many reasons. The fact that our own galaxy is over a 100,000 light years wide means that if the universe were younger than that, light wouldn't have been able to reach us yet, and we couldn't even fully see our own galaxy. There's also many other methods. Point is, this isn't anything new or controversial, about 97% of scientists agree that the earth and universe are very, very old.
@@RitmosMC NEWSFLASH!!! There IS NO truly accurate way of Determining the AGE of Rocks, OR, Sedimentation beyond 40..... 50,000 years. It's all nothing more than "Circular Reasoning," my Friend. The Geology of this Earth has gone through TONS of Change. Uniformitarianism is simply a man--made THEORY, and, aside from being impossible to PROVE----It is not only Highly unlike ly-----it is completely ILLOGICAL!
@@RitmosMC AND-----The Galaxy itself may well be Millions of Years in age----however, the Earth itself demonstrates a MUCH YOUNGER age. Did you know----it does NOT take Thousands of years, much less, MILLIONS to form a Fossil? In Fact, under the right conditions, They can be formed within a few MONTHS. Laboratory experiments have been conducted, and this was Discovered to be the case. All that is needed, is for the animal, Dead, or alive.....to be Quickly COMPRESSED, and Sealed in the Sediment, and DRIED before the animal decomposes. The VAST majority of dead animals would be CONSUMED by Predators, and what's left, the Weather would Consume. We would only have a FRACTION of the fossils we find, if the Evolution mold was True. NOTE; All across the Globe, there are these Massive Fossil burial Grounds, like the one in Alberta Canada. The total area stretches out for HUNDREDS of miles. Archeologists have discovered 9,000 animals buried there! NOTE; Before they were all discovered, the Sediment was "DATED" at "MILLIONS of years old," and Yet----The Fossils that were found are the VERY SAME we see Today------NO CHANGE!! PLUS; Secular Science will not TELL you THIS....But found right along side of these 'Conventional' animals, were a number of Fossils of Smaller Dinosaurs. INTERESTING NOTE; These "MOUNDS" that are found all over the World, carry a Common Theme among them. All of the animals are Twisted, and Contorted into Extreme positions, as if some GREAT FORCE HURLED them unceremoniously against hillsides, and enbank ments. In Fact, this Great Force must have come Quite RAPIDLY because we find Many of these animals in the midst of doing things like; Killing their Prey, giving birth.....even COPULATING, YES----This is FACT!
@@dawnemile7499 I disagree. Evolution and natural selection have been proven by scholars and accepted as true and taught in academia for many decades. Only fanatical and uneducated people disprove of it. What IS ridiculous is the idea that an omnipotent sky God can resolve your problems. THAT has never been shown to be true.
As a Christian I feel it necessary to point out the idiocy of Dawkins’ conclusion of where life originated, more of the same, trillions of years this time. I laughed almost as hard as when I watched that “documentary” on Netflix about “infinity”.
Approx 4.6 Billion years is the age of our planet as understood by uranium dating mechanisms (a process more precise than carbon dating for greater age dates) but even carbon dating is relatively accurate for up to 5-6 thousand years which would put much question on many of the topics noted in this video. remember also that Dawkins is only one voice in a community and so it's not an accurate representation of known science. as i mentioned in my own comments, a singular sample hardly compelling, if it isn't repeatable it is refutable.
The point is, Dawkins said that he thinks that another ancient intelligent alien race, seeded the earth with life...Well what started life on that alien planet? Evolution? Where did this alien race get their DNA from? Atheists can say what they like, I know we were created.
@raygsbrelcik5578 Deal 1. He claims that DNA supports God's existence because DNA is not info itself without a language, and that this language must've been created by God. This is a misunderstanding of DNA on a very basic level. If you throw a ball, you're not sending the ball secret encrypted messages in a hidden language, you're just causing a reaction that, due to the laws of our universe, causes the ball the move. As such, although it can be helpful to imagine DNA as a language, this is simply not true. At its core level, DNA is just molecules arranged in a way so that when other molecules interact with it, it does certain things. This requires no secret languages or intelligent beings, it's simply how the universe works. 2. I think for a second there he started talking about how DNA only comes from DNA and can't come from nonliving matter? Yes, it is true that scientists aren't 100% sure how the first life formed, but this doesn't mean you can just god-of-the-gaps your way in and claim it proves your God. The ancient Greeks didn't understand lightning, they guessed that it was a god, and they were wrong. Why is now any different? It then spends multiple minutes rambling about DNA being a language with God the author, yada yada. Yeah no, as I said, although it's similar to a language, DNA is really nothing more than chemicals arranged in a way that, under the right circumstances, creates life. 4. He then says life is too complicated to be formed by natural processes. Uh, no, life today is extremely complicated, but the very first life forms were extremely simple, simple enough that certain chemical reactions with a bit of luck could easily form it. 5. Then he says how life requires information, and matter "never produces information," which makes me think this guy literally has no idea what he's talking about. If a rock rolls into a pond, it creates ripples. These ripples are obviously information- they can be observed and measured, and they weren't there before you threw the rock. Does this mean that rocks are secretly powered by God? Of course not, the information arose as a result of the unique interactions between the rock and its environment. Same with DNA. Yaps about the same stuff a while longer, yada yada yada yada… *yawns* 6. Shows a clip of Richard Dawkins not responding to a question about how new information evolves in matter, where he blanks out. Woah, an old guy blanks out for 5 seconds?! Darn, our entire theory is out the window! Might as well throw the research in the trash right now!! …like what is this dude on By the way, in case you're wondering what and acceptable answer would've been... uh, mutations? That's kinda how evolution works. Mutations are born and selected upon by environmental pressures, bringing about changes in a species over generations. Nothing hard to understand about that. This is elementary school level science, and I don't understand why this man can't grasp it. 7. I really don't know what Dawkins was talking about but even if that is what he meant, 1 dude saying something that vaguely aligns with what you believe doesn't mean a darn thing. We could have every single scientist in the world suddenly say that evolution is fake and it wouldn't change the fact that it isn't. Maybe Dawkins genuinely thinks this, maybe he has no idea what he's saying, maybe he's just crazy. I don't know, and I don't really care. 8. He says that atheists don't have evidence for evolution... uh, we do? Like, has this guy ever been to, I don't know, a school? Fossil records, genetics, radiometric dating, every bit of evidence we can possibly find supports the theory. 9. He says that the Bible "makes sense of the world..." yeah, this is funny by now. He's saying a story about worldwide floods, talking snakes, and magic powers is a good explanation for reality? 10. He then claims we have good evidence of Noah's flood because we have fossils deposited by water all over the Earth. Uh, no, it just happens that the primary method of fossilization involves the fossil being submerged in water. Also, if a flood buried the fossils, wouldn't we expect them to be all mixed up in different layers? Why do fossils get more complex the higher and more recent they are? If it was all from a flood, we would certainly expect the water to mix them all around. He then talks about how his view of reality somehow supports the formation of the Grand Canyon? Like what 11. Then he says that Mt. Saint Helens produced large geologic changes over a short period of time. Yes, extremely large events can produce changes to the surface in a small area around them. Remember though, eruptions like this are quite rare, and only effect very small areas. For the incredible geology we have worldwide to form, it would require these types of events to be occurring for, you guessed it, millions of years. Also, may I ask, how does this man suggest all the water appeared? The Earth doesn't contain anywhere even remotely close to the amount of water described in the Bible. Did God just, like, give the clouds magic infinite water powers, and then suck the water back into heaven when he was done or something? 12. The video says that modern rivers don't generally dig into the Earth. Uh, what? Source please? Like what? This guy is just making up stuff at this point. AND THEN THIS IS SO FUNNY LOL LIKE 30 SECONDS LATER HE SAYS THAT RAINSTORMS CAN CREATE MINIATURE CANYONS!!! LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL WHAT IS THIS GUY ON, HE LITERALLY CALLS IT FALSE WHEN IT SUPPORTS SCIENCE AND TRUE WHEN IT SUPPORTS HIM!!! LOL SERIOUSLY WHAT THE HECK LOL "Modern rivers don't generally cut downward into the solid rock" "A rainstorm can create miniature canyons in only minutes" Man you just can't make this up xD Then he says a bunch of nonsense about how canyons only form during "catastrophic processes" again, source please? Sir, you are not a geologist, please stop pretending... He names a bunch more perfectly normal geologic processes and says they somehow support Noah's flood... 13. FINALLY we're done with geology. OK, now he's saying that fossils only form over short periods of time. Again, source please? Also, just cause stuff can fossilize fast doesn't mean that instantly proves the Earth is some 6000 years old. Alright, I think I've said enough. If there's any more of his nonsense you want me to explain, feel free to ask.
He says "atheists are the ones with a blind faith". This is so true. What's easier to believe, what atheists believe that the Universe all of a sudden arose out of nothing, or that there was a Creator that created all things?
You are right for men have always believed in God or gods in all places and at all times, so saying there is no evidence for gods is like saying they believed such things for no reason and that would be wrong for the default would be to believe nothing if there were not good reason to do otherwise.
@@kiwisaram9373 No they had reasons. Reasons having nothing to do the existence of God. If they believed because God is real, then why so many wrong beliefs?
@@toldyouso5588 Most famous scientists identified as Christians because in their day they had no choice. Do you think people in Newton’s time had the option to be atheist? The closer you get to more modern and enlightened times the less likely scientists are to be religious.
I love the thumbnail! 'Charles didn't think of this' This obsession with Charles Darwin the young Earth creationists have is baffling. Nobody talks about Charles Darwin more than young Earth creationists, it's so weird
@Who_IsLike_God it's actually fantastic entertainment! It's also sad, because they put out so many videos that are so obviously anti-science, yet they love to talk about science all the time as if they are actually interested. Channels like this need to be mocked. We need more science literacy in the world, not more ignorance. So, yes, I pop in and out of these videos a lot leaving comments. I do it with other channels as well. No big deal, right? It's true though:-) young Earth creationists seem to be obsessed with Charles, as if evolutionary theory is based on him alone, one person, and he is some sort of Messianic figure or something. It's a clear-cut, excellent example of projection. Look how many videos they have on their Channel talking about Charles Darwin and biological evolution, and all they do is misrepresent and lie about the subject. That should raise some huge red flags in your head, but unfortunately, I know it doesn't.
@@jounisuninen So how long ago was this period in the earth's history? My creationist local vicar believes the earth is 6000 years old, bless his cotton socks.
You should also bring up the original Calendar God created. New Year's starts somewhere in March-April (Nisan/Aviv). We are living using the Gregorian Calendar, which differs from the original one. On the Gregorian calendar, I was born on the 9th month of September; on the Hebrew Calendar, I was born on the 6th month of Elul. If you haven't questioned our modern calendar, why would the New Year start in winter?
I remember in Expelled that Richard Dawkins said that the moment he stopped believing in God and heaven amd hell, a wave of relief swept over him. I think he remains a staunch atheist because he wants to keep that relief.
And that "relief" will turn to eternal torment upon his death. And at 82, he's closer to meeting God face to face than ever. All we can do is pray that he (and all who deny God) will repent and trusts in Jesus for forgiveness ... before it is too late.
@@LV4EVR why would you choose to believe in a god hood, subject, imperfect human beings… Creatures, who arose after billions of years to become aware and conscious… To eternal suffering? I kind of like the idea that God made a mistake with angels by giving them eternal life because now you have devils demons and everything that I have to be separated from Goddard chained up, or have to hang out in their special place… So he made man to be no different than the animals and the grass of the field… I have the breath of life… Which also means that they can die… And then return the life is a gift of God… And if you don’t get it… You’re just burnt up in the fire like tares, or like tears in rain
@@johnnyxmusic I believe in the Creator because there is a creation. I have studied the theory of evolution for decades, and have found it to be intellectually bankrupt and wholly incapable of explaining how life began and ANY of its complexity-vision, reproduction, perception, healing, thought, creativity, etc. You can choose to believe that nothing created everything, but that is beyond illogical, it is statistically impossible. Your words indicate confusion, and you don't understand and/or believe what the Bible plainly teaches. That's exactly what happens to all who reject God; He hides things from them and, ultimately will give them a 'reprobate' or 'depraved' mind. (Read Romans 1, it explains this perfectly.) Like me and everyone else, you have sinned against the very God who gave you life. You probably enjoy sin, as most of us do. However, sin separates you from God now, and if you die unforgiven, forever. Yes, eternal suffering. You will not be burnt up in the fire; you will exist forever, somewhere. Yet God sent His Son, Jesus Christ, to pay the penalty we're not able to. He offers you a choice of eternal life with Him, and the absence of everything bad; or, eternal existence without Him and the absence of anything good. Johnny, don't reject the offer of the Creator. He made you for a purpose, He knows everything about you, including all of your 'secret' sins, and loves you still. He didn't make you a robot; He allows you to chose or reject Him. It is your choice that determines your eternity. Praying that you will confess your sins to God, acknowledge that Jesus is God's Son-God in human flesh-that He died in your place, and ask Him to forgive you and give you eternal life today. Blessings and love.
The pagan teaching of ‘hell’ that many churches teach is an insult to the character and person of God Generally speaking no imperfect human would ever deliberately torture another person endlessly yet these ‘christians’ claim that GOD does this?? This means that God is i INFERIOR in character to imperfect sinful human beings who would never do such a thing How could that ever be true ? This disgusting teaching is a perfect example of how Satan the devil has very successfully deceived the ‘christian’ church No wonder they are partly responsible for the athiests of the world
I read Genesis and I saw how ridiculous it was compared with the the real world that surrounds me every day of my life. Answers in Genesis is a cult founded by a man who taught science to high school kids - a method of discovery that he never understood or believed.
It’s not ridiculous if you understand that genesis (and the rest of the Bible) is not a scientific story. It’s about larger metaphysical patterns described in story form.
Isn’t it odd that the Lord has given you (as well as all humans) free will to believe as you want. How does that change even one word of the Bible and how does that disprove even one event listed in the Bible? You have the free will to believe as you want but you don’t have the power to change anything that is true
This video misrepresents Dawkins so badly lol. You probably peed your pants the other week when Dawkins proclaimed that he is a 'cultural Christian', thinking he'd found God. In reality it just means that he was brought up in a Christianised society.
As a Deist : The bible is a man made book with man made wisdom (Kain and Abel) and man made fallacies : + light wasn't there before the sun + the earth wasn't there before the sun + Adam and Eve didn't exist + insects have six legs not four legs + the value of Pi isn't 3 + homosexuality is not a seduction by a satan, but a natural born healthy sexual orientation + the "firmament" is not a solid "roof" over the world + the moon doesn't produce visible light + etc etc If the bible would be from god it would be without fallacies, but it isn't.
One of the christian "rules" is honesty. Why do those who promote this cult always lie, I used to think they just were not clever enough to see the truth, now I am not so sure
@@charmainethomas751 Let's see.....the non-existent evidence for a worldwide flood, the idea that humans and dinosaurs coexisted, the idea that DNA could never have been less complex than it is now, the idea that changes in DBA cannot produce new species over time, the idea that only a short time has produced everything we see when it is conclusive that evolution has happened for billions of years, the idea that complex-appearing things like mountains and trees and eyes could not have happened without a designer creator god...... Need I say more? Remember, Kenneth Copeland now has a personal fortune of 3/4 of a BILLION dollars, all from donations from willing suckers.
@@charmainethomas751 How much time have you got, I have explained myself many times to people like you, never had a thank you or any honest rebuttal, I dont think you want to know, but if you do, just google it. there are literally hundreds of examples
So, I'm sorry for the wall of text that is about to follow but after watching your video, (more than once) there are some points that need to be addressed and I've made my notes below if you are interested in them. To note, I am agnostic, I find there is much missing in science as well as in religious texts but I try to understand as much as i can and keep an open mind about most things. I do feel that you could make a very interesting video about nothing else than the absolute morality topic at the end of this video, but I've made an interesting comment on that myself in the notes below. This didn't shatter my worldview but also didn't really tell me anything new. My notes. 02:50 you state that words couldn't appear spontaneously however most kids have at some point seen a word that formed within their alphabet spaghetti without direct intervention. within this same arch, the "Language" you define for DNA is a set of codes we as humans have assigned them based on the chemical compositions that are contained. 05:00 timescales are important, current estimates put the theory of abiogenesis at approximately 4 - 4.3 Billion years ago, a few million years as quoted, is the typical estimation for most noticeable divergences of speciation, you may think of this as the time for a new species of dog to have emerged naturally (not selectively bred for). 05:20 All life is at it's most basic parts simply a series of repeating chemical reactions, this "life from matter" speech is a little misconstrued in this context. 05:30 there are many different religious people from different faith backgrounds within the scientific community. 06:00 we've not seen new matter naturally come into existence because of those previously noted timescales. the planet is approx 4.6 Billion years old, early chemical reactions started within the first 500 million - 1 billion years by which point most chemical reactions have built chains of order, one feeding on the byproduct of another and in some cases combining as a result, the current understanding of science (broadly used) has been around only a few thousand years. Our observable conditions are drastically different from when they first emerged. throughout human history however we have synthetized many new constructs including basically all known medicine. 06:30 one book is not indicative of all knowledge, this is as much the truth for science as it is religion. 07:30 Quite underhanded to assume that the moment someone stops to think over the best way to answer a question is indicative of not having an answer, nor would giving an answer without the correct context make any greater sense. 08:40 you asked about intelligent design, he responded with an answer around intelligent design, one of many theories that surround the origin of life and in this case is on a par scale of a biblical creation, the idea that something we can't prove or disprove created everything we know. please see also the simulation hypothesis or Abiogenesis for some other alternatives. 09:30 continuation of the above point. He answered a question with one theory, interestingly a similar (if somewhat simplified) process of this is often in use today, selectively breading particular species for a desired result. we call it animal husbandry and is used to create cows with a higher milk yield for example. 10:00 again misconstrued and simplified that you would assume this is a cyclic event, it is a singular theory not one supported by all scientists, indeed the general view is to not assume Aliens for anything until all other more rational ideas are exhausted. 10:45 The bible is known to have been written and rewritten multiple times over and over to appeal to modern cultures and thinking, true of all beliefs (in this context science is included), however the term blind faith is indicative of one without evidence. your evidence is that you can see complex things but don't understand how they came to be a process that science tries to answer rather than accept. 10:50 "... and it does, over and over again." (confirm the existence of god), could you please give some examples of this confirmation? 11:15 If we all come from just one descendant, then surely our entire gene pool should be littered with the effects known from inbreeding. 11:50 just to confirm, but did you just akin the fossil records to the great flood? even though their time range as understood from carbon dating (among other processes) differs massively from those in the bible. 12:18 "I believe..." (in the context of flood water), arguably the biggest factor in the whole debate, science can give you a reason for how and why those different layers exist but what knowledgebase do you have to support your belief? 15:15 You acknowledge that the process typically takes much longer periods of time and that the layers observed have a variable makeup, i implore you to look up geo sampling techniques to further your understanding on the topic but in short there ways in which rapid changes in atmosphere (specifically in local regions) such as this eruption, are logged. this acknowledges that such extreme changes can occur but in for example the grand canyon, rock samples at different depths will result the variable changes over many many years. 15:55 you are even using biblical articles to uphold your argument, attempting to highlight them as real news, as before, i implore you to review more than a single source of information before making such claims. 17:50 while we are on the topic of "the great flood", could you please explain to me where all this water came from and where it went after, with all the previous articles you've mentioned large bodies of water rapidly shaping the landscape and used a real world example to try to uphold this ideal, but in the real world examples, geological events impacted current bodies of water in isolated environments not globally and without a starting event. 18:00 the process of fossilization takes a long time (normally), the death of the object being fossilized may have come rather swiftly. once immobile, that fossilization process could take as long as is needed, dead things rarely move. 18:40 this accounts for the laboratory conditions, many of the bacteria and other processes that would be natures way of acting this process are removed (as much as possible) to test specific reactions as desired by an experiment. this is generally a standard practice in labs to understand specifics rather than try to identify which process did what. 22:50 Ice ages (glaciation events) have occurred many time in our history and can be found in rock samples around the world as well as in the polar regions themselves. the preceding video to this was littered with factual inadequacies and missing information, again, please look up some information on these events and their supporting evidence. 23:00 "This explains the world" I'm not following... nothing you have said or shown has helped to interpret any of the multitude of events that lead us to where we are nor do they take into account a great deal of our history 24:00 basically what i just said above, you choose to ignore a great deal of the known history of earth. 26:00 You seem to hinge the argument here on the age of the earth being around 6,000 years old, even though you admit things like dinosaurs and thorns and even cavemen came before this period. 26:30 "One creation scientist i know..." again, singular sample sizes are not the most reliable, that is often considered one of the corner stones of science. Typically, if it is not replicable, it's refutable. 27:25 "one infallible dating method..." again my last point, singular sample sizes are not reliable. 27:45 absolute morality... this is a wonderful topic that really deserves more of your time. Right and Wrong are not fixed concepts, if they were our legal system would have no need for change, topics such as war and slavery which were often considered to be in the name of religion and progress would still be in place today as an absolute word, however we know this is not the right way. acknowledging change, difference and understanding, developing culture over time (one might say culturally evolving) is what has moved us from a tribal species into a global one. A good example of this is the indigenous people of North sentinel island, they have had very little interaction with the outside world and ate the last missionary that tried to tell them they were wrong. Thank you for anyone who reads this.
@@rayzorback88 Please expand, if you are referring to the video please give your reasons why you assume ignorance if you are referring to my comments, please also give you views and reasons for why my understandings on the matter are any less valid true ignorance is one who comments without reason or explanation, but reasons and explanations are both attempted by my comments and the video.
@@AaronWork-b5l As for the "GREAT FLOOD." There are Great "Fossil Beds" ALL OVER the Globe, like those in Alberta, Canada, and, various Sites all over N.America. NOTE; In Most cases, we see a most interesting Condition. We find Animals that were Obviously, and Unceremoniously HURLED against Hillsides, and Mud enbankments, as if some ENOR MOUS FORCE came upon then rather suddenly! AND; Almost every Fossil is found in an extreme, Contorted position. In Fact-----Many of these animals were in the process of conduct ing their daily "Business," such as; Eating, or killing their Prey. Or, Copilating.....Even, giving Birth, When the Cataclysm struck! To Add to that; Anthropologists have discovered Hundreds and Hundreds of Huge Shells, and, Shell fish up in High Mountainous Regions. In Fact----They have found Numerous, and Complete WHALE Skeletons, on the those High Mountain areas. No matter WHAT your "Worldview" is-----These things are UNDENIABLE, to say the Least!
@@AaronWork-b5l As for your words; "One Creation Scientist I know...." Did you know----There are Several evolution Scientists that, over the years, ADMITTED.....The "Fossil Record does not Supply us with the Convincing in--between stages of evolution that we should See..." It wasn't Just Darwin who honestly admitted this. Stephen J. Gould, in one of his books; "It's a Wonderful life," Admitted this. AND; Eugenie Clark admitted the truth about the Lack of evidence in the fossil record. Only SHE was foolish enough to assert...."It Doesn't Matter!" OH REALLY!?? I Challenge you to DISPROVE that which has been discovered in the Science of BIBLICAL ARCHAEOLOGY. More and More evidence is being brought forth that provides the Compelling accuracy of Scripture.
I assume you haven’t given much thought to your answer, nor could you wrap your mind around what was said in the video. I suggest you do more research on your own with an open mind. Your rhetoric indicates a mind set on continuing with the failed Darwinian course of thinking. One of your greatest points of pure ignorance is the statement about the Bible having been written over and over. However, it has not been changed from the first known existence of God’s word. So, I believe you have it confused with the Quran, which has been changed and several different examples exist today. I stopped reading your monologue after that false Bible statement. I know it’s hard for a brain washed mind to grasp the important truths of this video. So read the Bible, study it daily, and continue to do your research. Maybe you will be able to grasp the truth eventually. God said in his word, seek and you shall find. But, you have to want to find the truth regardless of where it leads. If you refuse to consider that your enemy could possibly be right you can never, just as Dawkins, come to the full knowledge of the truth.
The bible does NOT say that thorns came into the world ONLY after man sinned. Clearly plants have thorns to protect themselves from normal herbivores, which were around before man was created or the Garden of Eden saga played out. The thorns curse relates to man's gardening environment.
The Flood logically explains fossils and geological formations. While all carcasses are eaten away within days, this means that the evolutionist story of dead animals getting slowly buried under earth layers during millions of years must be nonsense. All fossils have come about as the consequence of a great geological catastrophe (the Flood) which buried animals suddenly when they were still alive.
A single flood event would jumble them all together, not sort them by faunal succession which is how they're sorted. It would also not create distinct layers that require different environmental conditions to form. What it would do is wipe out all life on Earth forever just from the heat, and there are a multitude of other reasons the Ark story doesn't work. @@jounisuninen
Noist-Robot seemingly doesn't understand simple chemistry which is why s/he/it truly believes that no intelligence is required to form DNA. Perhaps Moist-Robot would like to demonstrate how that happens - after all it requires no intelligence therefore it should be a simple thing for an intelligent mind to organize such a demo.
@@soonertee he can't, everybody here knows it. Sad thing about robots is they only follow what they're programmed to do. Fortunately he only pretends to be a robot. So exposure to the truth can still open his eyes.
Having read Origin of Species by Darwin, as well as Life, Its Nature Origin and Development by Oparin, I can tell you that a) Darwin did indeed find the basis for species, and that b) Oparin's work did indeed confirm it. (You know, that inconvenient scientific standard.)
One difference I note between most science based videos and most (not all, most) Bible based science is that scientist tend to say this is our best knowledge which is open to even better knowledge. Where most Bible based science videos say this proves we are absolutely right beyond any question. Interesting. Thus scientist tend to think they could be wrong. While the Bible based science says no possible way we are wrong.
And David, if the science says that you are wrong, and really does take a long time to make a fossil, you still going to believe in your 2000 year old fairy tales? Of course you will, better to remain ignorant than having to accept that your dogma is seriously flawed.
To the atheist, does information emerge by itself? If so how would you know it didn’t originate from a mind? After reading this do you assume that someone accidentally generated this by randomly hitting letters on a keyboard or do you automatically assume I intentionally typed this and how would you know?
@@JB-yb4wn Your fault your side didm't learn that abortng ypur own kids isn't great for your voter species. Is that supposed to be your evolution strategy? Don't come to us with your Molech issues.
@@stevepierce6467 I was a biology major and im convinced that natural selection is at work for weeding out bad genes but I can’t find a naturalistic explanation for how information is created. I also don’t see any convincing evidence for abiogenesis or how life can spontaneously assemble from non living matter. There’s other major problems with evolutionary theory but I find these two the most bothersome having to do with the information problem.
As an atheist this hardly makes an impression other than the utter desperation for those from the borrowed fiction of the supernatural deity. The heavens are silent the promised return has failed. It is folly, this fable.
"The heavens are silent the promised return has failed. It is folly, this fable." Let me quote Bible. 2. Peter's letter, chapter 3, verses 3-6 and 9-10: 3Most importantly, you must understand that in the last days scoffers will come, scoffing and following their own evil desires.a 4“Where is the promise of His coming?” they will ask. “Ever since our fathers fell asleep, everything continues as it has from the beginning of creation.” 5But they deliberately overlook the fact that long ago by God’s word the heavens existed and the earth was formed out of water and by water, 6through which the world of that time perished in the flood. 9The Lord is not slow in keeping His promise as some understand slowness, but is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish but everyone to come to repentance. 10But the Day of the Lord will come like a thief. The heavens will disappear with a roar, the elements will be destroyed by fire, and the earth and its works will be laid bare. Matthew chapter 24, verses 37-39: 37As it was in the days of Noah, so will it be at the coming of the Son of Man. 38For in the days before the flood, people were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, up to the day Noah entered the ark. 39And they were oblivious, until the flood came and swept them all away. So will it be at the coming of the Son of Man.
Even if you took all his claims at face value, he did nothing to show creationism to be true. This video is just Ken putting out false understanding of how science works to try & debunk evolution, then asserting that creationism is therefore the only other explanation.
@@Yipper64 I can't remember every point Ken makes in this video, but a decent example is when he brings up dating methods of the Earth. He claims that around 90% of dating method can't get billions of years. Then gives the example of how carbon dating can't date past 50,000 years. Well yes carbon dating alone cannot give us the age of the earth (assuming its over 50,000 years old). We can cross compare carbon 14 dating to other forms of dating methods such as ice sheets, tree rings, plate tectonics, other forms of radiometric dating & to even known dates of ancient events (i.e. Mt Vesuvius eruption) to find out how accurate these dating methods are to each other. This allows us to know that these methods of dating are consistent with each other & we can use longer & longer dating methods to measure the age of things. Using U-Pb dating, we have around 4.5 billion years worth of half-life decay. This is 1 of the several ways how we know the age of the earth. Ken didn't necessarily discredit carbon dating in this video, but even with just carbon 14 dating alone we can preclude creationism if we have any half-life dates older than 6 thousand years. A common counter point creationist give is that decay rates maybe used to be faster, but if you had the 4.5 billion years of decay we have crammed into the time span of only 6,000 years, you would create enough heat to melt off the crust of the earth. You seem like a person with genuine curiosity, & I'm not attacking Christianity or God. Creationism is a misguided interpretation of the bible that is simply not compatible with our observations of the universe.
@@tone9358 Ok so that is just his carbon dating point, which I get, but honestly it gets so complex I cant be sure. Its just in general radiometric dating requires some kind of assumption of how much of the original isotope was there, which can change the result. And then if that type of thing is used for a basis of say ice sheets, then that would make the ice sheets flawed. I think that whole thing could easily have the issue of them kind of circularly proving each other, because if you have a flawed reference point, then use that to determine one method and then the next, and all that, then all of the dating methods are using the wrong reference point. As a random side note, I did notice he kind of mis-represented Richard Dawkin's argument, so im with you if you would bring that up. He was indulging the hypothetical, not agreeing with it. Here's the big thing for me, as it has more specifically to do with my faith then the science itself, and that's his later point, being that sin causes death, and death could not have happened before man, but of course, going off all of this, you find death before man. I just dont think as a Christian you can believe in evolution at least, something has to give because these two concepts contradict eachother, natural selection requiring death and all. The closest I can see is the idea of genesis being a metaphor of some kind but "its a metaphor" is a very sloppy way to interpret the bible when you dont understand something, and again as shown in the video Jesus clearly did not treat Genesis in that way. Amongst other issues with that interpretation. I would also note that, even as explained in the video, the bible never states how old the earth is, young earth creationism is just predicated on the assumptions of lifespan and that kind of thing. So I am open to at least the concept of; 7 days didnt mean literally 7 days. That is pretty much the only thing im currently willing to budge on at this moment, if push comes to shove. Because basically, the bible has proven itself to me, much of so called science has not. I know you may think that's backwards, but it isnt to me. I would like to hear your thoughts on the flood explanations, because it explains the layers and such being made in a much shorter amount of time due to a larger quantity of water. It seems to make sense but also logically more water doesnt JUST mean that it does more things, at least, that was my thought before the brought up the effects of the volcano creating those canyons by making those mud flows happen. Unless they are misleading people, those mud flows show that a canyon can in fact take a lot less time then those dating methods would assume.
@@Yipper64 There are core samples with layers are trapped organic matter. The carbon dating and layer counts match up pretty well. THAT is not circular. And as for the flood. You don't reach that conclusion without starting with it. And the amount of energy required for what some Creationists talk about would melt the Earth.
I’m trying to find the logic in saying that the very same flood that laid down the layers of sediment or rock of the Grand Canyon, was then, somehow almost simultaneously washed out by that same flood water. Honey, that doesn’t make sense.
23:58 … or death was part of the natural process, before humans. Show me evidence, outside the Bible, that sin brought death into the world, and you will have my full attention.
"Destroys... " 😂 Yea, sure... There's a very good reason why we are taught about gravity & evolution in science class... They both have mountains of evidence backing them.
The gravity of ignoring God who created all things, is very deep. It's as logical and respectful as a child rejecting his parents because he wants to be his own boss. I think that in fact very little about gravity is taught in any school classes.
Such effort to retain the rights to believe in a place that is wrong in every sense, makes nothing right, no justice or justification, just vengeance. The dirtiest, most disgusting thing we were ever asked to believe. Now in order to witness, give testimony for our faith, is to find and condemn those worthy of spending an eternity in torment. We can’t honestly think of one person that really deserves that, so we pretend to trust God will do that. Makes our life complete and beautiful. Sickening what religion forces us to pretend. Just for the honor of peers.
@@donniegreenpastorofgraceby5475who said anything about my intelligence? I’m just saying the information within the video is neither informative nor accurate.
@@leroyjenkins3744 then you can enlighten us with your proof and intellect of this subject. If you disagree merely because you were taught differently or you heard it a different way ok share, or don’t blindly object without knowledge why but you just cannot accept the premise of the information. So with waited breath explain how it is wrong don’t just merely say oh this is wrong bring proof or merely say it’s against your feelings. Scientifically, none of the information provided here can be disputed by any proof. So, this video makes a clear statement and you can can I don’t believe it because it hurts my feelings or what someone else said or taught but you cannot not say this information is wrong based on knowledge or science.
@@donniegreenpastorofgraceby5475look man I didn’t want to write a wall of text, but since you want it so badly then here you go. I have degrees in biology and biochemistry. I know the inter-workings of DNA pretty well seeing as how it’s my field of study. DNA is described as a language by Ken here. This is not entirely accurate or true. The genetic code can be thought of as a language that we read but that is only we have assigned language-like aspects to it. This is because DNA “language” is physical properties of DNA not a language that conveys abstract information. That’s like calling the color of a car in a lineup at a dealership a language. The letters associated with DNA provide different shapes and binding opportunities for enzymes to conform to. Think of it like a boulder falling down a hill and landing in a hole big enough for the boulder. You wouldn’t say that the rock knew it would land in that spot nor that the spot was a language for the rock or that the spot was made for said rock. It just happens to fit. This is similar to how enzymes interact with DNA. Of course now, over the course of millions of years enzymes have been selected for the ability to better bind to DNA. That was done by little mistakes in the process of crating proteins. That’s what we call mutations. Mutations can be deleterious, advantageous, or silent and in this case they are advantageous. It’s not a language. Also the clip of Richard Dawkins is taken out of context and cut in a way to make him look bad. Ken does nothing but pure uneducated propaganda on this channel. He makes fallacy after fallacy and keeps on going. It is not informative nor accurate information.
The atheist view is that there is no convincing evidence that god exists. Your inability to understand scientific concepts does not convince the atheist that god exists.
The atheist view is that there is no evidence that your could ever present that would make me believe in God. Lol Your unwillingness to explore other options rather than a chance occurrence of life coming from nothing does not disprove the existence of God.
@KGrace0001 so while all the dinosaurs were dying, not one single rabbit copped it. Not one single mammoth. And not one single human. Its quite convenient that every mammoth on the whole earth managed to survive longer than every single dinosaur
@Who_IsLike_God you have completely missed the point. Why did they die in separate layers if they were all in the same place. Animals in the higher layers do not appear in the lower layers. Are we to believe that everything died in a specific order
@Who_IsLike_God you are not engaging honestly. I am talking about fossils that are found in the same geographical location but different layers. But I think you know that. If you are not going to address this honestly then I am done sorry
@@raygsbrelcik5578 Try me, I know this stuff better than you. Tell me how the Egyptians missed the flood memo. Tell me who in Noah's crew had DNA markers for Inuit, Australian aborigine, or even Tolmec traits. Waiting for your inane answer.
The ardent evolutionist will keep adhering to the mythical belief no matter what logic is put to him or her. They prefer belief in the Age of Rocks to believing in the Rock of Ages. They hate Him without cause.
Even evolutionists know there are alternative creation stories to the one in the Bible. However, they choose to believe in the Abyss after life instead of continuing in Glory. It makes me wonder how many evolutionist atheists choose this way because their life is miserable and they feel they would have to mend their ways in order to continue in Glory. So instead they choose to believe in the Abyss.
Do you say that because you believe in the modern mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, and that if you just wait a long enough *time* then puddles of chemicals can fizz into people by chance? I notice that *for some reason you live in contrast to the atheistic "we're all just chemicals" belief system, but perfectly in line with everything the God you reject said about you instead as a valuable human being made in His image and likeness - why do you do that?* That is powerful evidence you can see in yourself that God created you, and that you're not just "meaningless evolved protoplasm" in a meaningless chemical universe that doesn't care about you, and I love that He put that into you so you can see clear evidence in yourself that He exists. God said you are a meaningful and valuable human being made in His image and likeness (Genesis 1:27), with a purpose and a unique capacity for "dominion" over creation as you sit here typing this (Genesis 1:26), morality and a sense of justice (Genesis 9:6), a sense of dignity and respect towards others (James 3:10), a capacity for free will rational thinking and decision making (Genesis 2:16), and a conscience which reflects the principles of His law (Romans 2:15), among other things. These are observable qualities that we all observe in you, and being made in God's image and likeness makes perfect sense of that. How do you explain these qualities of the image and likeness of God in you from your own worldview? For example, *is "rape" always wrong in your worldview, or is it sometimes morally permissible - and why?* Where does that come from in your worldview? Animals do it all the time, it's "normal" - it's "natural" - and we're just "evolved animals," right? Chemical reactions destroy each other all the time, it's "normal" - it's "natural" - and who cares - we're "just chemicals," right? What's the difference...? *"They show that the requirements of the law are written on their hearts, their consciences also bearing witness, and their thoughts sometimes accusing them and at other times even defending them."* (Romans 2:15)
@@kpkpm3604 So then you just admitted that human beings are not evolved animals, thus evolution is false at this point - remember that the next time an evolutionist says we are evolved apes, or 'we are fish' (PZ Myers), etc. As for "genocide," that's just a common lie - do you say that because you think it should be okay to sacrifice babies in the red hot metal hands of their statues as they do unspeakable things with animals in public...? What you call "genocide" actually had nothing to do with 'race" at all, consider Rahab and her "race." Also God said: *"Whoever steals a man and sells him, and anyone found in possession of him, shall be put to death"* (Exodus 21:16), that alone shows you don't know what you're talking about in regards to "slavery" my friend. But there's a much more glaring issue here... as someone who believes you are "just chemicals" or "meaningless evolved protoplasm" in a meaningless universe (Huxley), *How do you get from meaningless goo to meaningful and valuable you just by adding time + chemicals + chance in a meaningless universe?* Everything you're doing here is ironically an example of a very Christian-Atheism, as you perfectly live out all the qualities I listed above of God's image and likeness programmed into you; it all makes sense from a biblical worldview. Nothing you're doing makes any sense from a "we're all just chemical accidents" worldview, my chemical reaction friend. You actually can't have "morality" in your worldview as a meaningless chance chemical reaction in a meaningless universe (ie. an Atheist), you just haven't logically thought through this. Every time you recognize something as beautiful, valuable, lovely, "good" - you are borrowing that from God's image and likeness programmed into you, not from your "meaningless chemical accident evolved protoplasm universe," and I love that He put that into you because that is powerful evidence even you can see in yourself that He exists. *"The long and short of it is that I became convinced that atheism implies amorality; and since I am an atheist, I must therefore embrace amorality... The religious fundamentalists are correct: without God, there is no morality. But they are incorrect, I still believe, about there being a God. Hence, I believe, there is no morality."* (Joel Marks, Professor Emeritus of Philosophy, University of New Haven, "Philosophy Now," Sep 2010).
Bless your heart, sweet summer child. Give this whole thing 1000 more years, and there won't be many religious people left. Unfortunately, I have to life in a world where this is not the case unfortunately 😢
@@TheSaintFrenzy Apparently it's the Creationists who keep insisting that Science is wrong. That sex isn't the same as gender, that biology is wrong when it states that a XX chromosome pair equates to a female while an XY pair equates to a male. Those Atheists I'm aware of, all accept the general science position. (And it's the Marxist/Socialist/Communist that want to destroy the school systems.)
Amen AIG. DNA has encoded information in it. Random chance and mutations cannot produce that. Its a silly thing to think creation came about without the hand of God. 🙂🙏✝️
@@richardgregory3684 natural selection or microevolution is not something creationists disagree with. It is a far cry from saying one species over millions of years became another one.
@@christtheonlyhope4578 Then you must agree that it is not "random chance". "Microevolution" and "macroevolution" are creationist inventions. Unable to deny that living things do indeed change through successive generations, they yet seek to deny speciation. In reality, there is only evolution,and small changes through many generations leads to large change, including new species. I suspect you next excuse will be something about "kinds", whatever those are supposed to be.
@@richardgregory3684 as the other guy said, microevolution isnt something creationists disagree with, that part is obviously observable. Every time a virus mutates, the massive variety of dog breeds, all that type of thing. But here's the thing, natural selection still requires the base DNA for it to mutate and change, so it doesnt prove where it came from the in the first place, that's the point.
@@Yipper64 "Micro" and "macro" evolution are just creationist inventions, the more sane among them cannot deny the obvous, but they still want to cling to the bible, so they accept bacteria change but refuse to accept that existing species can produce new ones. Evolution has never sought to explain the origin of life. That is just the god of the gaps argument. Science doesn;lt know with any great certainty how life got started, although there are some good hypotheses. The origin of life is almost certainly chemistry, starting with relatively simple self-replicating molecules. The moment you get those (and yes, we pobserve those forming naturally), evolution through natural selection kicks in. The very earliest "life" was probably not even DNA based, but more likely, RNA.
Thats the human curse. Always trying to simplify complex situations in ways that we can comprehend. Even if the conclusion we’ve come to contradicts the facts of the situation. Sometimes facts feel so incomprehensible that we must believe someone’s in control. Humans biggest fear is the unknown and religion is a direct result of that fear. Its more comforting to believe someones pulling the strings
@@luish1498 Everyone knows what evolution is, all the schools have force fed it, the government and media bombards us with it. Brrainwashing may have worked on you but not on all of us.
How could anyone even get close to refuting any of this? This is THE logical position and the correct one. Everything points towards Creator, Jesus Christ is Lord! Amen 🙏🏽👑
@@themachine9000 Why don't you pray to God and ask Him to make the truth known to you? There is only one God; the Creator is Jesus Christ. Currently, your sins separate you from Him, and if you die in that state, you will spend eternity in Hell, separated from Him and all that is good. Your loving Creator does not want that to happen to you. That is why you've been given this message, and why He sent Jesus to die in your place. When you acknowledge Him as your savior and turn from your sins, He will make you new; He will give you a new heart, and new understanding. Repent and trust in Him, while you still can. ---all in love
@@themachine9000 that’s what research and discovering the truth is all about… it can’t be the Muslim God because one hour of research disputes that, and same with Buddha, nothing refutes Jesus, I’ve never once heard a legit response when asking someone to refute or discredit Jesus, they can’t because he’s perfect.
@Who_IsLike_God humans are highly developed and we have consciousness that overrides our instincts and makes decisions. We are also a highly social species. We make choices about what is the right way to behave. When that is done altruistically we think of it as a moral choice. But everyone has their own distinct view of what is right and wrong that is as distinct as a fingerprint. Just listen to any coffee shop debate for evidence of this. Certain things like murder have such a strong consensus that they are enshrined in law. But even here there are plenty of sociopaths and psychopaths who see nothing wrong in murder. Were they created in gods image? On other lesser issues there is even less consensus. Ask 10 people in a bar if it's OK to test perfume on animals and you'll see what I mean. My conclusion is that even though there is overwhelming consensus on acts like murder, morality itself does not have an objective standard
@Who_IsLike_God no I don't think morality is defined by majority. I think morality is completely personal. Enforcement of certain morals through the law is decided by majority in order to protect society from people who's moral code is deemed harmful. Over time our morality has changed. In a more tribal time it was probably thought good to bump off the chief of the neighbouring village and take over all their possessions. As society has become more cooperative and global we have extended our altruistic feelings beyond the immediate confines of our village. This kind of fluid view of morality can't happen if it's an unchanging moral law. As for your last example. I believe that rape is wrong. And I would like to hope the men on the island would think the same. But nature and the universe would care not one jot. Its not objective in that sense
@Who_IsLike_God that is correct. There is no objective good and bad. There always has to be a subjective start point. You can say that good improves wellbeing and bad the opposite. But the decision to make wellbeing the goal is subjective. You can choose to base good and bad on the bible but that is still just someone's opinion. You think it's a god. I say the bible was written by man and any morality preached in it comes from man. Either way its still subjective
@@Who_IsLike_Godwhat? The first part of the responce suggests that phycopathy or anti social or lack of emotion is all socialisation and not ya know a serious mental issue that can happen to people of all backrounds even religious. Plunty of serieal killers had religious backrounds
@@mattbrook-lee7732if all morality is objective and religion grounds all morality why even within religion does morality change so drastically? All Christians should all belive in the same moral princibles if that was true but we all know its not whats moral to a Protestant might not be moral to a Catholic.
The very fact that anything exists at all is more evidence of a creator than the lack of one. When someone tells me to prove there’s a God, I say, “just look around.” And there is no way to prove that there is no God. The further you look up or down, the more dangerous you will find it to be. We only have this thin slice of all of existence in which we can survive… and I no longer believe that all of this could come just from trillions upon trillions upon trillions of random accidents. (Look up: Levinthal’s Paradox.)
Lol it’s impossible not to have a philosophical worldview. Just because you never fleshed it out, doesn’t mean that you don’t have one. Although atheism would only be part of someone’s worldview.
Dawkins is even more hopeless in his second answer than in his first. The second answer showed how foolish he was. At least the first one when he was silent, he, just seemed ignorant.
Atheism can indeed be considered a worldview when it forms part of a broader framework of beliefs and perspectives on fundamental questions about existence, morality, meaning, and the nature of reality. While atheism itself is simply the absence of belief in gods, individuals who identify as atheists often have a distinct set of beliefs and values that shape their understanding of the world, making atheism a component of their overall worldview.
😮 I think I heard you say, after Adam and Eve sinned,God created thorns and thistles, but after He created man He rested. God cursed the land to make the thorns more abundant and the land needing man to work to produce food.
This format with graphics makes it a lot easier to watch through the whole video. please keep it up
Agreed
For those of us that are visual learners, it definitely helps. 😊
@@betsieswartz yet here you are
Doesn’t help - it’s a tough watch- and the worst thing is that people believe it and think it’s fact - and it reinforces their delusions
@@betsieswartz Then, why TORTURE yourself??
Thank you all for this! I hope I can get my brain to wrap around all of this so I can also let others know the truth! GOD Bless you all!!!
When you look at megalithic structures you cannot conclude the people that built them were dumber than we are today. And therefore, you can't conclude they were made naturally over the process of millions of years, because their architecture was extremely complex. The more complex something is, the higher the chance it was created by a designer and the lesser chance that it was randomly generated overtime.
As attested by Gen 11:6-8 And the Lord said, indeed the people are one and they all have one language, and this is what they begin to do; now nothing will be withheld from them. (8) So the Lord scattered them abroad from there over the face of the earth... The evidence of this is the megalithic structures all over the world. YT: Examples of Ancient Megalithic Technology Around the World and The World's Most Enormous Ancient Megaliths, Yangshan Quarry China. Baalbek Lebanon
No scientist today will tell you that ancient man wasn’t smart these people love to use outdated information to try to prove their point that has already been disproven time and time again
That's nonsense buddy, just because megalothic structures got built doesn't mean people have to have been designed.
That's a complete non-sequiter.
@@Gek1177 What? It means they were more unsophisticated, primitive, neanderthal types? Not possibly evidence for being created, genetically, physically and intellectually very good. Still early in the stages of accumulating genetic, adverse mutations, the loss of information.
@@Gek1177You 100% missed the point.
There's so much astonishing order in the things we take for granted every day. Air, water, our bodies animals, and plants the weather and seasons
Yes, that piece of dog poo on the sidewalk was obviously designed, no way that could be random.
@@JB-yb4wncome on, they're right. There's so much wonder in the world it's clearly evidence of the creation of beauty by science! 😅
@@JB-yb4wn
Mockers and scoffers. The Bible true yet again.
@@JB-yb4wn
God created the processes that dogs use. If evolution is true, how would animals even excrete waste? Evolution has so many problems with it and holes in it, its not even funny.
Obviously!!! After all, those useless organs in the human body that do literally nothing and hog resources are totally beautiful and god-given, and obviously NOT the process of random mutations and natural selection. That would be silly!! 😉
Pastor Bob Enyart of Denver Bible Church took a few people to Mount Saint Helens shortly after it blew up. He was able to bring back some things like Pumas, and other rocks from the site in a Gorge around the Mount Saint Helens site. He decided to take some of the rocks and send them to Laboratories to find out when they were formed. Now when one laboratory comes up with their answers on when they were formed, they carefully repackage the rocks and send them to four other Laboratories to see if their results are synonymous. When this was all said and done those rocks came back to the original laboratory that Bob took them to. When Bob talked to the scientist he originally gave the rocks to, he asked him, so how old are these rocks? When were they formed? The scientist said all the data from all the Laboratories State they were formed millions of years ago give or take a few million years. Then the scientists asked Bob where did you get these rocks? Bob said at Mount Saint Helens about 2 weeks ago! It left those evolutionary scientists absolutely speechless.
Cool story bro. That obviously didn’t happen.
@@nathanwhite704 well you wouldn't know because you weren't there but whatever
@@isaiahkelly9608 and you broke the 9th commandment with that story. It’s creationist propaganda. In reality the creationists did faulty research themselves using k-ar dating which was the equivalent of using a meat thermometer to measure how tall a person is.
"evolutionary scientists"? Age of rock are measured from the moment liquid lava becoming solid rock. Volcanic bombs are older, from earlier eruption
FYI a change of state from liquid to solid does NOT change the "age" of the material. OBVIOUSLY. Think of water and ice in your refrigerator and glass at dinner.
I think he believed that there is a creator, but he did not want to face it because of his human pride.
Richard was entertaining the idea of how a god would have probably made life & where to look for that evidence if his hypothesis was the case. Not that he believes that to be the case.
The grand proud is the one who thought he could choose the true God, but the fact that it is impossible - just to choose a kind of fresh leefygreens sometimes you couldn't do it the right way. The truth is that if you choose the right God, it is because He had first chosen you. That is the true christian, a very humble person who wants to share the word of God the Trinity.
@@tone9358 Yeah that's the only issue I have with this video, they wherent interpreting that argument correctly. Its sort of a "well even if we did find a signature, that doesnt mean it was God it could be some other hypothetical intelligent race"
Which, in my opinion doesnt really address the question, but yeah. The point he was making didnt imply his own belief in this concept, it was just taking the hypothetical and raising an argument against it.
@@tone9358 and yet had no other explanation. Could have been and yet no other explanation seems possible. If there were a naturalistic explanation for it he would have said that, instead of saying what he did. When asked specifically how it could happen that was the only answer he came up with. Makes one wonder.
@@zerosteel0123he was answering a hypothetical question. He doesn’t believe aliens made humans. Also that question that was asked to him where he pauses is cut very deceptively. He obviously didn’t just sit there dumbfounded. They cut it like that to make it seem like he doesn’t know what he’s talking about. He has a PhD in biology. He knows what he’s talking about
We were created to be instruments of worship and praise to our Creator. It took me almost 50 years to realize that. Thank you God and the book of Romans for the deep spiritual conviction! The first half of my life was serving myself, the second half is serving the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
Amen brother 🙏 Thats exactly right 🙏 we were made to worship and glorify the Almighty 🙌
A hard pill to swallow for many…pride stands in their way
Amen!
"The first half of my life was serving myself," When you discover the truth, you know! God bless, praise Yah!
Why would it take 50 years if it was true?
“instrument of worship”
So your God is just selfish like a monster, he created minions or slaves to serve him? I can’t believe this is said by people who say they love their God and still got agreement in the comments. Unbelievable.
This one of the most helpful and important videos I have ever seen!
Wow.... I feel sad for you.
@christopheespic Yea me to, he must not have seen any of the other great videos these guys make.
@@andygraham7218🙄🙄
This is so awesome 👏 bravo brother, thank you for this, may God Bless you for this ❤in Jesus Christ name Amen
christ is king!!
"This is so awesome thank you for supporting my cognitive biases, I really needed someone to tell me exactly what I wanted to hear instead of facts and the truth! God bless echo chambers!!!"
@@tarkus42 perhaps you should let the echo go further into your brain. You may learn something. 😉🙏✝️
@@newcreationinchrist1423
Evilutionists: "You Creationists don't know science! We do! However, we could not empirically prove the 'Missing Link,' so we dropped that like a hot potato!
Now, we have the 'common ancestor.' However, again, we can't prove it empirically, so we'll be dropping that, too!
We will make up the next one and call it, OONGALA-COONGALA-BOONGALA-WOO!
Try and debunk that!"
@@newcreationinchrist1423 Thanks you for confirming that your world view is artificially programmed. Indoctrination via fear and group control "Cult behaviour" is a sad place to find yourself. Perhaps one day you will read your second book, and start to build an appreciation for the world around you? ? Nah, lets be honest... You haven't read your first book yet as the fastest way to the truth is to read the bible without your thumb up your bum and your brain in neutral. It is easy... You read a page then you simply say to yourself, does that sound reasonable or is it total hogwash!!!
It looks like the debate over Noah's Flood has been going on for ages if Peter is talking about it in his epistle.
All the early christians were well versed in even older Middle Eastern folklore and mythology, which included flood stories. That massive catastrophic floods occurred (and still occur) is beyond dispute. A really bad one in the misty dawn of human civilization would certainly have created a traumatic impact great enough for the event to be memorialized in the local lore. But still there is no evidence of a worldwide flood event.
It's BEEN obvious garbage since it was first written!! It smelled like a lie, a cartoon told to entertain gullible children!!
Everything I have learned says yes their was a wordlwide flood.
Water in different sediments of rock, shells and fish bones found on high mountains that are inland.
A variety of people from different civilizations have reported a flood as well.
@@fatmayo2293
That's just wishful believing, you were raised with that myth, and so you PREFER to believe the other believers who are actually NOT real scientists and lifelong experts in Geology, ALL of which REAL Geologists will tell you exactly the same evidence that proves it never happened. I am a scientist, a physicist, electronic engineer, computer designer, and an Evolutionary genetics programmer. I hate to see you being scammed by these brainwashed religion nuts and liars! That myth comes from previous local empires who had similar children's fables from which the Noah myth was itself stolen. The story of Gilgamesh, and the story of Utna Pishtim before it are the ancestors of the Noah/Ark/Flood story, all with different gods and differing explanations, going back three thousannd years, we have then on clay tablets written in cunieform with a wedge stylus! Such are found in ancient collections of popular children's stories, they are not holy or magically true! The jews simply stole it to twist into their torah the way THEY wanted it!! If you don't have much in your holy book, then you grab stuff to fill it out so people will believe in it!!
@@fatmayo2293 People have been reporting floods for as long as there have been people and floods. Floods are so widespread that it would be surprising that memories of a particularly catastrophic one would not have formed part of the collective mythic memory of every human group on the planet.
Water has been found in aquifers all over the planet, possible evidence for floods at one time or another, or for surface water seeping into underground spaces.
We now know, as our ancient ancestors did not, that geologic uplift is responsible for places once deep underwater are now dry plains or even mountains. My part of the Midwest was once a sea, and labeled in my youth (the 50s) as The Great Inland Sea. Sorry, no evidence for a single world-wide flood. And actually considerable evidence for NO worldwide flood: in northeast Nebraska there is a site called Ashfall Fossil Beds State Historical Park. Fossils here from 12,000,000 years ago show no signs of ever having been flooded. Deep underground caves in Europe (Lascaux, Altamira) have never been flooded and had their wall art from 25,000 to 40,000 years ago damaged.
The petrification process is done by removing the organic matter while preserving the and hardening the cell casing, this was done chemically to speed up the process but naturally it would take a while.
We rely on dating methods every time you put fuel in your car. How do you think they work out where to drill?
@Who_IsLike_God exactly. And we use that value reliably time and again to make predictions such as where to find oil, fossils etc. One of the scientific tests of a theory is its ability to make verifiable novel predictions.
@Who_IsLike_God it's not scientists that won't change. Theories such as evolution and the big bang were very controversial and met with a lot of resistance. Eventually the weight of evidence shifts people's opinions. It's creationists who start with the answer and try to make the facts fit.
There is a massive amount of evidence for evolution. So much bigger than the fossil record. Finding anomalies is what science deals with all the time. Theories are constantly revised. But the basic premise of random mutation plus natural selection has proved bullet proof for a long time
Funny, when they drill they find hundreds of meters of sedimentary rock layers filled with billions of dead things and find coal, oil and natural gas still having carbon 14 in it when the secular time says there should be none.
The amount of times there are assumptions which go on as a basis to your supposed Truth is astonishing.
Ditto for mathematically impossible macro evolution
The scientific understanding of genomics has greatly expanded in the last 10 years and destroys the theory of evolution
Holding to the myth of evolution is now embarrassing
Teaching evolution in our schools and Universities is like still teaching a Flat Earth
its like saying the sky is blue because of water vapor. it might be partially true but the overwhelming majority is not for that reason
The fossil record clearly contradicts creationism.
@@Donald_Trump_2024 Does Donald Trump represent a Godly person?
That seems like an insane claim to me because in my opinion DNA sequencing is the best evidence for evolution.
Perhaps you could provide more detail?
@@markduell2468how so? 🤔
Creation is making more sense everyday I live this life and honesty seek answers.
To be separate from God is to be truly without wisdom no matter how intelligent a person is . John 14:9 KJV Bible !!!
That same Bible condones slavery. Are you OK with that?
Amen
I love it 🙏
I'm confused, what does John 14;9 have to do with the comment or the video? Not trying to offend you, I just don't know if you made a mistake of which verse you wanted to quote.
@@XxOHKOxX No mistake He is where every answer can be found every Blessing . The man is lost in a never ending question .
You know what else never happens? Nothing has never created something.
Where did your god come from?
@@--..-...-..-.--.... he's outside of creation. He is eternal.
@@Sundayschoolnetwork that doesn't explain anything... where did he come from?
@@--..-...-..-.--.... God doesn't come from anywhere. He is.
@@Sundayschoolnetwork so he's nothing? How can he be a he?
We say ..we don't know..that called honesty
Nah, mate. Plenty of neckbeard atheists who infest these videos acting like they know of everything...
Thanks
Mount St Helens was still awe inspiring that november. Flew quite close to it in november that year.
God gives us evidence.
Yes, evidence that volcanoes exist, and sometimes erupt. So now we have definitive, god-given proof of evolution: Ashfall Fossil Beds State Historical Park in northeast Nebraska is where they found whole flocks of several now-extinct species of animals who were buried by ash from a volcanic eruption 12,000,000 years ago. All of these animals are ancestors of animals alive today. Hallelujah!!! Amen.
That's NOT evidence of "god" but of the molten core of our planet!!
@@rstevewarmorycom Right on!
@@stevepierce6467
It's a lot of work playing Whack-a-Mole with liars!!
@@rstevewarmorycom Especially hard with the people who lie to themselves. They are so indoctrinated by the bible-thumping part of their upbringing that they become unaware of the terrible contortions they must undergo to reject one part of modern science while blithely accepting most others, some, like medicine and crop production, heavily based on evolution.
Even with DNA you still might not have life.
Life is not a thing of chance, but a gift from somewhere out of the world we are familiar with, because of the Love of the gift Giver.
Pure garbage. The educated KNOW how genetic chemistry works!! YOU DO NOT!!
Life is a gift from God. He created all life
@@scooterliberty4217
That would include parasites and malaria mosquitoes? Why would your laughable god do that?
@JB-yb4wn Read the first 3 chapters of Genesis and you will find your answer. Then keep reading.🙂
@@nyxculp9290
Well let's see.
Oh I see that the Earth was created before the universe, well that's a lie.
Night and day was created before the sun, well that's a lie.
There is supposed to be a dome separating the waters, well that's a lie.
Plants were created before anything else, well that's a lie.
Stars were created after the Earth, well that's a lie.
The moon is a night light, the moon reflects the sun's rays, so that's a lie.
So you want me to learn how to lie like a theist?
Thanks AIG 🙏🕊️✝️
Thanks for misinformation?
@@betsieswartz No----Thanks for Cuttin' it Straight!
@@raygsbrelcik5578 they do the exact opposite though
@@betsieswartz No-----They do NOT!
@@raygsbrelcik5578 they do
AronRa’s RUclips channel has 8 videos that disprove the Flood story.
Nice recommendation, I enjoyed that series. I missed out watching it when he first posted it as I was deeply indoctrinated into charismatic Christianity and avoided him like the plague but now that I’ve gone through several deconstructions I watch everything he posts same goes for gutsick gibbon.
Can you give the basic reason behind Ra's rebuttal idea? Cheers
@@barryblackwood6050 It didn’t happen, and there is evidence against it - I guess that’s the idea… In fact saying there is evidence against it is an understatement. Any knowledge of world history paired with common sense very quickly reveals the absurd impossibility.
@@L-8 Have you seen Mount St Helen's footage? That shut my mouth & opened my eyes.
@@barryblackwood6050are you saying that opened your eyes to the fact genesis is myth? Or that it opened your eyes that it’s not? Either way how does that work? It doesn’t make sense.
I enjoy looking at these comments. It really shows how people can think differently and not understand what others can understand so well. Listen... It takes more than just the Bible to understand God. It takes a Church, a strong spiritual community, and most importantly a priest that stands with the very first traditions of Christ and Holiness. I come from a Catholic background, but didn't understand God much at all, however I am learning more and more about it all as I am now aspiring into Greek Eastern Christian Orthodoxy. It takes more than words for someone to understand. It takes time, patience, and courage.
For the atheist, believe what you want, just don't call us foolish for wanting to believe that we were meant to have a purpose.
For Christians, stay strong. Our Lord will come serve our hearts justice at the time of the Second Resurrection, whenever that time may be. Follow Christ with all your heart, do not be afraid of the fallen world of which has tainted our hearts with fear, anger, and hatred. And most importantly, pray for the ones who have gone against us. Lord have mercy.
See, when you say "for the atheist, believe what you want", is missing the point. The point is that atheists don't really believe anything. They find the evidence for any kind of god completely wanting. So it leaves us with a lot of unanswered questions.
@@nathancook2852Yeh well----the Catholic religion is a False
Religion! True Christians NEVER committed the atrocities that
the RCC committed!
And Almighty GOD will GIVE understanding to anyone who
Comes humbly before HIM. You do not know the Bible, or
its Power-----Therefore, you are not qualified to speak against
It.
Respectfully.
Evidence and facts beat blind brainwashed faith
It breaks my heart that young people in public schools don’t get to hear this and at least have the option to decide creation or evolution. Instead they are taught today they have a choice to be male or female.
I had a friend at Fort Polk, LA that said he was on earthen dam and the water was right at the top of the dam. He dragged a stick across the dam to form a trickle of water. He went on playing. Before the day was over his little atream had drained the pond . Think what would happen on a larger scale.
Think about this high pressure water can cut steel.
Do you realize how unbelievable that is? Just like everything in this video, and the Bible on top of that, this comment is completely untrue with no evidence to back it up, is poorly written, and only a fool would believe it.
Flowing water can move earth quickly. Flowing water carrying rocks can cut slowly through solid granite, Water at industrially high pressure can cut steel. Over millions of years, flowing water can carve a canyon.
@@stevepierce6467
Is that what Mt Helena showed?
@@judyswiderski2682 I don't know anything about Mt Helena. Mount St Helens is a volcano and I have no idea what connection it has to the short- and long-term effects of water on rock.
@@stevepierce6467
I just saw a video on it and others had not. There are two videos called Mt St Helena and the other Four Lessons From the Mount St. Helena Eruption. There are amazing things around it. Thank you for asking.
BRAVO!! 10 thumbs up!
More like “BOO!! 10 dumbs down!”
This guy thinks he knows more about science then every scientist who studies it, and it’s depressing that nearly everyone in these comments believes him
Very well taught. I learned something. It's lovely..thank you All. For helping us understand the Bible so much better. God bless the staff of this channel 🙏❤
You're better off learning from actual working scientists.
Maybe Francis Collins. He is an evangelical Christian. He was also head of the human genome project.
They decoded the human genome, actually looked inside it. Collins said what he saw in there was that our ancestry is not human, and we share it with the rest of life.
Collins is a geneticist. Is Ham? Do you think Ham and his colleagues have looked inside the human genome? Do you think they know more than Collins?
@@burntgod7165 Do you actually know what a double Helix is better known as Jacob's ladder
@@JohnnieParker-u7b So what? It is a metaphor. And seeing as you don't know how to punctuate, you're not likely to grasp that, either.
You've not countered the evidence the human genome project confirmed.
@@burntgod7165
Well reading all that evidence would take away from valuable window licking time.
@@JB-yb4wn Do you want to try again to be grownup?
People have free will and unfortunately not everyone will agree on everything. Prayers for those hard hearted💔 people who will ignore all of the signs that God their creator is giving them. 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Ah yes, like the dozens of different signs he has given us that the Earth is 4.5 billion years old? Because those signs totally point towards creationism, yeah yeah sure.
@@RitmosMChow are scientists able to measure the time of which something buried in the ground exactly?
@@KGrace0001
Radioactive dating is the main method scientists use.
Also, if we're talking about the entire universe, not just our planet, we know it's billions of years old for many reasons. The fact that our own galaxy is over a 100,000 light years wide means that if the universe were younger than that, light wouldn't have been able to reach us yet, and we couldn't even fully see our own galaxy. There's also many other methods. Point is, this isn't anything new or controversial, about 97% of scientists agree that the earth and universe are very, very old.
@@RitmosMC NEWSFLASH!!! There IS NO truly accurate way of
Determining the AGE of Rocks, OR, Sedimentation beyond 40.....
50,000 years. It's all nothing more than "Circular Reasoning," my
Friend.
The Geology of this Earth has gone through TONS of Change.
Uniformitarianism is simply a man--made THEORY, and, aside
from being impossible to PROVE----It is not only Highly unlike
ly-----it is completely ILLOGICAL!
@@RitmosMC AND-----The Galaxy itself may well be Millions of
Years in age----however, the Earth itself demonstrates a MUCH
YOUNGER age.
Did you know----it does NOT take Thousands of years, much less,
MILLIONS to form a Fossil? In Fact, under the right conditions,
They can be formed within a few MONTHS.
Laboratory experiments have been conducted, and this was
Discovered to be the case. All that is needed, is for the animal,
Dead, or alive.....to be Quickly COMPRESSED, and Sealed in the
Sediment, and DRIED before the animal decomposes.
The VAST majority of dead animals would be CONSUMED by
Predators, and what's left, the Weather would Consume. We
would only have a FRACTION of the fossils we find, if the
Evolution mold was True.
NOTE;
All across the Globe, there are these Massive Fossil burial
Grounds, like the one in Alberta Canada. The total area stretches
out for HUNDREDS of miles. Archeologists have discovered
9,000 animals buried there!
NOTE;
Before they were all discovered, the Sediment was "DATED" at
"MILLIONS of years old," and Yet----The Fossils that were found
are the VERY SAME we see Today------NO CHANGE!!
PLUS;
Secular Science will not TELL you THIS....But found right along
side of these 'Conventional' animals, were a number of Fossils
of Smaller Dinosaurs.
INTERESTING NOTE;
These "MOUNDS" that are found all over the World, carry a
Common Theme among them. All of the animals are Twisted,
and Contorted into Extreme positions, as if some GREAT FORCE
HURLED them unceremoniously against hillsides, and enbank
ments. In Fact, this Great Force must have come Quite RAPIDLY
because we find Many of these animals in the midst of doing
things like; Killing their Prey, giving birth.....even COPULATING,
YES----This is FACT!
I love watching these, they makebme realise that I am, in fact, so much smarter than a lot of people.
God Bless you brother
He started something and every one fell for it.
It is a ridiculous video.
Yeah the people writing the Bible did that
Almost everyone. Some had to agree because they were forced by academia.
@@betsieswartzBoth the Bible and Darwin's theory are impossible. Only thing is Darwin's theory is more impossible to believe.
@@dawnemile7499 I disagree. Evolution and natural selection have been proven by scholars and accepted as true and taught in academia for many decades. Only fanatical and uneducated people disprove of it.
What IS ridiculous is the idea that an omnipotent sky God can resolve your problems. THAT has never been shown to be true.
What 'view' is that?
RUclips is becoming a pain to watch with all the ads. Are ther alternative platforms to watch your videos on?
As a Christian I feel it necessary to point out the idiocy of Dawkins’ conclusion of where life originated, more of the same, trillions of years this time.
I laughed almost as hard as when I watched that “documentary” on Netflix about “infinity”.
I dont' belive Dawkins said trillions of years, it is just 4 billion years
Approx 4.6 Billion years is the age of our planet as understood by uranium dating mechanisms (a process more precise than carbon dating for greater age dates) but even carbon dating is relatively accurate for up to 5-6 thousand years which would put much question on many of the topics noted in this video.
remember also that Dawkins is only one voice in a community and so it's not an accurate representation of known science. as i mentioned in my own comments, a singular sample hardly compelling, if it isn't repeatable it is refutable.
The point is, Dawkins said that he thinks that another ancient intelligent alien race, seeded the earth with life...Well what started life on that alien planet? Evolution? Where did this alien race get their DNA from? Atheists can say what they like, I know we were created.
Great video!
Thanks and congratulations. Very well presented ❤.
This is some of the most poorly presented bull crap ever lol, I’m firmly convinced this guy doesn’t understand evolution in the slightest
@@RitmosMCW
@@RitmosMC WELL then-----by ALL MEANS....EXPLAIN!!
I'd LOVE to Study your definition thereof, my friend!
@raygsbrelcik5578
Deal
1. He claims that DNA supports God's existence because DNA is not info itself without a language, and that this language must've been created by God.
This is a misunderstanding of DNA on a very basic level. If you throw a ball, you're not sending the ball secret encrypted messages in a hidden language, you're just causing a reaction that, due to the laws of our universe, causes the ball the move. As such, although it can be helpful to imagine DNA as a language, this is simply not true. At its core level, DNA is just molecules arranged in a way so that when other molecules interact with it, it does certain things. This requires no secret languages or intelligent beings, it's simply how the universe works.
2. I think for a second there he started talking about how DNA only comes from DNA and can't come from nonliving matter?
Yes, it is true that scientists aren't 100% sure how the first life formed, but this doesn't mean you can just god-of-the-gaps your way in and claim it proves your God. The ancient Greeks didn't understand lightning, they guessed that it was a god, and they were wrong. Why is now any different?
It then spends multiple minutes rambling about DNA being a language with God the author, yada yada. Yeah no, as I said, although it's similar to a language, DNA is really nothing more than chemicals arranged in a way that, under the right circumstances, creates life.
4. He then says life is too complicated to be formed by natural processes. Uh, no, life today is extremely complicated, but the very first life forms were extremely simple, simple enough that certain chemical reactions with a bit of luck could easily form it.
5. Then he says how life requires information, and matter "never produces information," which makes me think this guy literally has no idea what he's talking about. If a rock rolls into a pond, it creates ripples. These ripples are obviously information- they can be observed and measured, and they weren't there before you threw the rock. Does this mean that rocks are secretly powered by God? Of course not, the information arose as a result of the unique interactions between the rock and its environment. Same with DNA.
Yaps about the same stuff a while longer, yada yada yada yada… *yawns*
6. Shows a clip of Richard Dawkins not responding to a question about how new information evolves in matter, where he blanks out. Woah, an old guy blanks out for 5 seconds?! Darn, our entire theory is out the window! Might as well throw the research in the trash right now!! …like what is this dude on
By the way, in case you're wondering what and acceptable answer would've been... uh, mutations? That's kinda how evolution works. Mutations are born and selected upon by environmental pressures, bringing about changes in a species over generations. Nothing hard to understand about that. This is elementary school level science, and I don't understand why this man can't grasp it.
7. I really don't know what Dawkins was talking about but even if that is what he meant, 1 dude saying something that vaguely aligns with what you believe doesn't mean a darn thing. We could have every single scientist in the world suddenly say that evolution is fake and it wouldn't change the fact that it isn't. Maybe Dawkins genuinely thinks this, maybe he has no idea what he's saying, maybe he's just crazy. I don't know, and I don't really care.
8. He says that atheists don't have evidence for evolution... uh, we do? Like, has this guy ever been to, I don't know, a school? Fossil records, genetics, radiometric dating, every bit of evidence we can possibly find supports the theory.
9. He says that the Bible "makes sense of the world..." yeah, this is funny by now. He's saying a story about worldwide floods, talking snakes, and magic powers is a good explanation for reality?
10. He then claims we have good evidence of Noah's flood because we have fossils deposited by water all over the Earth. Uh, no, it just happens that the primary method of fossilization involves the fossil being submerged in water. Also, if a flood buried the fossils, wouldn't we expect them to be all mixed up in different layers? Why do fossils get more complex the higher and more recent they are? If it was all from a flood, we would certainly expect the water to mix them all around.
He then talks about how his view of reality somehow supports the formation of the Grand Canyon? Like what
11. Then he says that Mt. Saint Helens produced large geologic changes over a short period of time. Yes, extremely large events can produce changes to the surface in a small area around them. Remember though, eruptions like this are quite rare, and only effect very small areas. For the incredible geology we have worldwide to form, it would require these types of events to be occurring for, you guessed it, millions of years.
Also, may I ask, how does this man suggest all the water appeared? The Earth doesn't contain anywhere even remotely close to the amount of water described in the Bible. Did God just, like, give the clouds magic infinite water powers, and then suck the water back into heaven when he was done or something?
12. The video says that modern rivers don't generally dig into the Earth. Uh, what? Source please? Like what? This guy is just making up stuff at this point.
AND THEN THIS IS SO FUNNY LOL
LIKE 30 SECONDS LATER HE SAYS THAT RAINSTORMS CAN CREATE MINIATURE CANYONS!!! LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL WHAT IS THIS GUY ON, HE LITERALLY CALLS IT FALSE WHEN IT SUPPORTS SCIENCE AND TRUE WHEN IT SUPPORTS HIM!!! LOL
SERIOUSLY WHAT THE HECK LOL
"Modern rivers don't generally cut downward into the solid rock"
"A rainstorm can create miniature canyons in only minutes"
Man you just can't make this up xD
Then he says a bunch of nonsense about how canyons only form during "catastrophic processes" again, source please? Sir, you are not a geologist, please stop pretending...
He names a bunch more perfectly normal geologic processes and says they somehow support Noah's flood...
13. FINALLY we're done with geology. OK, now he's saying that fossils only form over short periods of time. Again, source please? Also, just cause stuff can fossilize fast doesn't mean that instantly proves the Earth is some 6000 years old.
Alright, I think I've said enough. If there's any more of his nonsense you want me to explain, feel free to ask.
@@RitmosMC HELLO??
He says "atheists are the ones with a blind faith". This is so true. What's easier to believe, what atheists believe that the Universe all of a sudden arose out of nothing, or that there was a Creator that created all things?
_"atheists believe that the Universe all of a sudden arose out of nothing"_
And you still don't know what atheism is.
Where did this creator come from?
@@richardgregory3684 this Creator is uncreated
@@christtheonlyhope4578 Ah yes, good old special pleading. So if your "God" reuqired no creator....why does anythig else need one?
@@richardgregory3684 , mortal beings don't know.
This is an epic presentation! 🎉❤👏🏻
I know, the way Ken can pack in so many lies and misinformation and just pure ignorance is certainly epic.
Didn’t know trying to debunk scientific fact based off your own beliefs and misunderstandings was considered “epic…”
You could destroy every scientific theory that exists and that would still say nothing about the existence of any gods.
You are right for men have always believed in God or gods in all places and at all times, so saying there is no evidence for gods is like saying they believed such things for no reason and that would be wrong for the default would be to believe nothing if there were not good reason to do otherwise.
@@kiwisaram9373 People also believe in ghosts, alien abductions and Santa Claus.
@@kiwisaram9373
No they had reasons. Reasons having nothing to do the existence of God.
If they believed because God is real, then why so many wrong beliefs?
Name your top 5 anti-God scientist and lets compare them with my top 5 Christian scientists.
@@toldyouso5588 Most famous scientists identified as Christians because in their day they had no choice. Do you think people in Newton’s time had the option to be atheist? The closer you get to more modern and enlightened times the less likely scientists are to be religious.
What is your view on Dr. Sarah Hill and her book on evolution?
I love the thumbnail!
'Charles didn't think of this'
This obsession with Charles Darwin the young Earth creationists have is baffling. Nobody talks about Charles Darwin more than young Earth creationists, it's so weird
@Who_IsLike_God it's actually fantastic entertainment! It's also sad, because they put out so many videos that are so obviously anti-science, yet they love to talk about science all the time as if they are actually interested. Channels like this need to be mocked. We need more science literacy in the world, not more ignorance. So, yes, I pop in and out of these videos a lot leaving comments. I do it with other channels as well. No big deal, right?
It's true though:-) young Earth creationists seem to be obsessed with Charles, as if evolutionary theory is based on him alone, one person, and he is some sort of Messianic figure or something. It's a clear-cut, excellent example of projection. Look how many videos they have on their Channel talking about Charles Darwin and biological evolution, and all they do is misrepresent and lie about the subject. That should raise some huge red flags in your head, but unfortunately, I know it doesn't.
Wonderful! Thank you for sharing! Many Blessings to all folks involved.
My five year old has asked me how old the earth is, and how did Duck billed platypus make the 14000mile journey to the Ark. They die in salt water.
Your five year old is an intelligent and reasonable individual. It's a shame the video author isn't more like your child.
@@t-bonewtf
Thanks, appreciate your comment. The founding fathers of USA were sensible to separate church and state.
Of course you knew of Earth's history and told to your five year old that at that time there was the Pangaia i.e. the uniform continent. Well done.
Pangaea broke apart around 176,000,000 years ago. Waaaaaayyyy before the platypus came along.@@jounisuninen
@@jounisuninen
So how long ago was this period in the earth's history? My creationist local vicar believes the earth is 6000 years old, bless his cotton socks.
Well mr ken ham your in a good mood today your speaking faster then light
You should also bring up the original Calendar God created. New Year's starts somewhere in March-April (Nisan/Aviv). We are living using the Gregorian Calendar, which differs from the original one. On the Gregorian calendar, I was born on the 9th month of September; on the Hebrew Calendar, I was born on the 6th month of Elul. If you haven't questioned our modern calendar, why would the New Year start in winter?
I remember in Expelled that Richard Dawkins said that the moment he stopped believing in God and heaven amd hell, a wave of relief swept over him. I think he remains a staunch atheist because he wants to keep that relief.
I believe you are right.
And that "relief" will turn to eternal torment upon his death. And at 82, he's closer to meeting God face to face than ever. All we can do is pray that he (and all who deny God) will repent and trusts in Jesus for forgiveness ... before it is too late.
@@LV4EVR why would you choose to believe in a god hood, subject, imperfect human beings… Creatures, who arose after billions of years to become aware and conscious… To eternal suffering? I kind of like the idea that God made a mistake with angels by giving them eternal life because now you have devils demons and everything that I have to be separated from Goddard chained up, or have to hang out in their special place… So he made man to be no different than the animals and the grass of the field… I have the breath of life… Which also means that they can die… And then return the life is a gift of God… And if you don’t get it… You’re just burnt up in the fire like tares, or like tears in rain
@@johnnyxmusic I believe in the Creator because there is a creation. I have studied the theory of evolution for decades, and have found it to be intellectually bankrupt and wholly incapable of explaining how life began and ANY of its complexity-vision, reproduction, perception, healing, thought, creativity, etc. You can choose to believe that nothing created everything, but that is beyond illogical, it is statistically impossible.
Your words indicate confusion, and you don't understand and/or believe what the Bible plainly teaches. That's exactly what happens to all who reject God; He hides things from them and, ultimately will give them a 'reprobate' or 'depraved' mind. (Read Romans 1, it explains this perfectly.)
Like me and everyone else, you have sinned against the very God who gave you life. You probably enjoy sin, as most of us do. However, sin separates you from God now, and if you die unforgiven, forever. Yes, eternal suffering. You will not be burnt up in the fire; you will exist forever, somewhere. Yet God sent His Son, Jesus Christ, to pay the penalty we're not able to. He offers you a choice of eternal life with Him, and the absence of everything bad; or, eternal existence without Him and the absence of anything good.
Johnny, don't reject the offer of the Creator. He made you for a purpose, He knows everything about you, including all of your 'secret' sins, and loves you still. He didn't make you a robot; He allows you to chose or reject Him. It is your choice that determines your eternity. Praying that you will confess your sins to God, acknowledge that Jesus is God's Son-God in human flesh-that He died in your place, and ask Him to forgive you and give you eternal life today.
Blessings and love.
The pagan teaching of ‘hell’ that many churches teach is an insult to the character and person of God
Generally speaking no imperfect human would ever deliberately torture another person endlessly yet these ‘christians’ claim that GOD does this??
This means that God is i
INFERIOR in character to imperfect sinful human beings who would never do such a thing
How could that ever be true ?
This disgusting teaching is a perfect example of how Satan the devil has very successfully deceived the ‘christian’ church
No wonder they are partly responsible for the athiests of the world
I read Genesis and I saw how ridiculous it was compared with the the real world that surrounds me every day of my life.
Answers in Genesis is a cult founded by a man who taught science to high school kids - a method of discovery that he never understood or believed.
It’s not ridiculous if you understand that genesis (and the rest of the Bible) is not a scientific story. It’s about larger metaphysical patterns described in story form.
Isn’t it odd that the Lord has given you (as well as all humans) free will to believe as you want. How does that change even one word of the Bible and how does that disprove even one event listed in the Bible?
You have the free will to believe as you want but you don’t have the power to change anything that is true
You probably understand that your own life is ridiculous, JRW.
And you didn't even need Woody Allen to tell you that.
@@Ohmy1956
Well jesus was born when, exactly? Because the bible gives two possible dates, separated by 10 years.
Thank you answers in genesis for making me an Atheist.
I guess that the fact that God is incapable of lying doesn't apply to you. That whole speech was basically "because the bible tells me so".
This video misrepresents Dawkins so badly lol. You probably peed your pants the other week when Dawkins proclaimed that he is a 'cultural Christian', thinking he'd found God. In reality it just means that he was brought up in a Christianised society.
As a Deist :
The bible is a man made book with man made wisdom (Kain and Abel) and man made fallacies :
+ light wasn't there before the sun
+ the earth wasn't there before the sun
+ Adam and Eve didn't exist
+ insects have six legs not four legs
+ the value of Pi isn't 3
+ homosexuality is not a seduction by a satan, but a natural born healthy sexual orientation
+ the "firmament" is not a solid "roof" over the world
+ the moon doesn't produce visible light
+ etc etc
If the bible would be from god it would be without fallacies, but it isn't.
One of the christian "rules" is honesty. Why do those who promote this cult always lie, I used to think they just were not clever enough to see the truth, now I am not so sure
They lie because it is so profitable to do so!
What they lie about?
@@charmainethomas751 Let's see.....the non-existent evidence for a worldwide flood, the idea that humans and dinosaurs coexisted, the idea that DNA could never have been less complex than it is now, the idea that changes in DBA cannot produce new species over time, the idea that only a short time has produced everything we see when it is conclusive that evolution has happened for billions of years, the idea that complex-appearing things like mountains and trees and eyes could not have happened without a designer creator god...... Need I say more? Remember, Kenneth Copeland now has a personal fortune of 3/4 of a BILLION dollars, all from donations from willing suckers.
@@charmainethomas751 How much time have you got, I have explained myself many times to people like you, never had a thank you or any honest rebuttal, I dont think you want to know, but if you do, just google it. there are literally hundreds of examples
@@charmainethomas751everything
So,
I'm sorry for the wall of text that is about to follow but after watching your video, (more than once) there are some points that need to be addressed and I've made my notes below if you are interested in them.
To note, I am agnostic, I find there is much missing in science as well as in religious texts but I try to understand as much as i can and keep an open mind about most things.
I do feel that you could make a very interesting video about nothing else than the absolute morality topic at the end of this video, but I've made an interesting comment on that myself in the notes below.
This didn't shatter my worldview but also didn't really tell me anything new.
My notes.
02:50 you state that words couldn't appear spontaneously however most kids have at some point seen a word that formed within their alphabet spaghetti without direct intervention.
within this same arch, the "Language" you define for DNA is a set of codes we as humans have assigned them based on the chemical compositions that are contained.
05:00 timescales are important, current estimates put the theory of abiogenesis at approximately 4 - 4.3 Billion years ago, a few million years as quoted, is the typical estimation for most noticeable divergences of speciation, you may think of this as the time for a new species of dog to have emerged naturally (not selectively bred for).
05:20 All life is at it's most basic parts simply a series of repeating chemical reactions, this "life from matter" speech is a little misconstrued in this context.
05:30 there are many different religious people from different faith backgrounds within the scientific community.
06:00 we've not seen new matter naturally come into existence because of those previously noted timescales. the planet is approx 4.6 Billion years old, early chemical reactions started within the first 500 million - 1 billion years by which point most chemical reactions have built chains of order, one feeding on the byproduct of another and in some cases combining as a result, the current understanding of science (broadly used) has been around only a few thousand years. Our observable conditions are drastically different from when they first emerged. throughout human history however we have synthetized many new constructs including basically all known medicine.
06:30 one book is not indicative of all knowledge, this is as much the truth for science as it is religion.
07:30 Quite underhanded to assume that the moment someone stops to think over the best way to answer a question is indicative of not having an answer, nor would giving an answer without the correct context make any greater sense.
08:40 you asked about intelligent design, he responded with an answer around intelligent design, one of many theories that surround the origin of life and in this case is on a par scale of a biblical creation, the idea that something we can't prove or disprove created everything we know. please see also the simulation hypothesis or Abiogenesis for some other alternatives.
09:30 continuation of the above point. He answered a question with one theory, interestingly a similar (if somewhat simplified) process of this is often in use today, selectively breading particular species for a desired result. we call it animal husbandry and is used to create cows with a higher milk yield for example.
10:00 again misconstrued and simplified that you would assume this is a cyclic event, it is a singular theory not one supported by all scientists, indeed the general view is to not assume Aliens for anything until all other more rational ideas are exhausted.
10:45 The bible is known to have been written and rewritten multiple times over and over to appeal to modern cultures and thinking, true of all beliefs (in this context science is included), however the term blind faith is indicative of one without evidence. your evidence is that you can see complex things but don't understand how they came to be a process that science tries to answer rather than accept.
10:50 "... and it does, over and over again." (confirm the existence of god), could you please give some examples of this confirmation?
11:15 If we all come from just one descendant, then surely our entire gene pool should be littered with the effects known from inbreeding.
11:50 just to confirm, but did you just akin the fossil records to the great flood? even though their time range as understood from carbon dating (among other processes) differs massively from those in the bible.
12:18 "I believe..." (in the context of flood water), arguably the biggest factor in the whole debate, science can give you a reason for how and why those different layers exist but what knowledgebase do you have to support your belief?
15:15 You acknowledge that the process typically takes much longer periods of time and that the layers observed have a variable makeup, i implore you to look up geo sampling techniques to further your understanding on the topic but in short there ways in which rapid changes in atmosphere (specifically in local regions) such as this eruption, are logged. this acknowledges that such extreme changes can occur but in for example the grand canyon, rock samples at different depths will result the variable changes over many many years.
15:55 you are even using biblical articles to uphold your argument, attempting to highlight them as real news, as before, i implore you to review more than a single source of information before making such claims.
17:50 while we are on the topic of "the great flood", could you please explain to me where all this water came from and where it went after, with all the previous articles you've mentioned large bodies of water rapidly shaping the landscape and used a real world example to try to uphold this ideal, but in the real world examples, geological events impacted current bodies of water in isolated environments not globally and without a starting event.
18:00 the process of fossilization takes a long time (normally), the death of the object being fossilized may have come rather swiftly. once immobile, that fossilization process could take as long as is needed, dead things rarely move.
18:40 this accounts for the laboratory conditions, many of the bacteria and other processes that would be natures way of acting this process are removed (as much as possible) to test specific reactions as desired by an experiment. this is generally a standard practice in labs to understand specifics rather than try to identify which process did what.
22:50 Ice ages (glaciation events) have occurred many time in our history and can be found in rock samples around the world as well as in the polar regions themselves. the preceding video to this was littered with factual inadequacies and missing information, again, please look up some information on these events and their supporting evidence.
23:00 "This explains the world" I'm not following... nothing you have said or shown has helped to interpret any of the multitude of events that lead us to where we are nor do they take into account a great deal of our history
24:00 basically what i just said above, you choose to ignore a great deal of the known history of earth.
26:00 You seem to hinge the argument here on the age of the earth being around 6,000 years old, even though you admit things like dinosaurs and thorns and even cavemen came before this period.
26:30 "One creation scientist i know..." again, singular sample sizes are not the most reliable, that is often considered one of the corner stones of science. Typically, if it is not replicable, it's refutable.
27:25 "one infallible dating method..." again my last point, singular sample sizes are not reliable.
27:45 absolute morality... this is a wonderful topic that really deserves more of your time. Right and Wrong are not fixed concepts, if they were our legal system would have no need for change, topics such as war and slavery which were often considered to be in the name of religion and progress would still be in place today as an absolute word, however we know this is not the right way. acknowledging change, difference and understanding, developing culture over time (one might say culturally evolving) is what has moved us from a tribal species into a global one.
A good example of this is the indigenous people of North sentinel island, they have had very little interaction with the outside world and ate the last missionary that tried to tell them they were wrong.
Thank you for anyone who reads this.
Astounding ignorance on display
@@rayzorback88
Please expand,
if you are referring to the video please give your reasons why you assume ignorance
if you are referring to my comments, please also give you views and reasons for why my understandings on the matter are any less valid
true ignorance is one who comments without reason or explanation, but reasons and explanations are both attempted by my comments and the video.
@@AaronWork-b5l As for the "GREAT FLOOD." There are Great
"Fossil Beds" ALL OVER the Globe, like those in Alberta, Canada,
and, various Sites all over N.America.
NOTE;
In Most cases, we see a most interesting Condition. We find
Animals that were Obviously, and Unceremoniously HURLED
against Hillsides, and Mud enbankments, as if some ENOR
MOUS FORCE came upon then rather suddenly!
AND;
Almost every Fossil is found in an extreme, Contorted position.
In Fact-----Many of these animals were in the process of conduct
ing their daily "Business," such as;
Eating, or killing their Prey. Or, Copilating.....Even, giving Birth,
When the Cataclysm struck!
To Add to that; Anthropologists have discovered Hundreds and
Hundreds of Huge Shells, and, Shell fish up in High Mountainous
Regions. In Fact----They have found Numerous, and Complete
WHALE Skeletons, on the those High Mountain areas.
No matter WHAT your "Worldview" is-----These things are UNDENIABLE, to say the Least!
@@AaronWork-b5l As for your words; "One Creation Scientist
I know...." Did you know----There are Several evolution Scientists
that, over the years, ADMITTED.....The "Fossil Record does not
Supply us with the Convincing in--between stages of evolution
that we should See..."
It wasn't Just Darwin who honestly admitted this.
Stephen J. Gould, in one of his books; "It's a Wonderful life,"
Admitted this.
AND;
Eugenie Clark admitted the truth about the Lack of evidence in
the fossil record. Only SHE was foolish enough to assert...."It
Doesn't Matter!"
OH REALLY!??
I Challenge you to DISPROVE that which has been discovered in
the Science of BIBLICAL ARCHAEOLOGY.
More and More evidence is being brought forth that provides the
Compelling accuracy of Scripture.
I assume you haven’t given much thought to your answer, nor could you wrap your mind around what was said in the video. I suggest you do more research on your own with an open mind. Your rhetoric indicates a mind set on continuing with the failed Darwinian course of thinking. One of your greatest points of pure ignorance is the statement about the Bible having been written over and over. However, it has not been changed from the first known existence of God’s word. So, I believe you have it confused with the Quran, which has been changed and several different examples exist today. I stopped reading your monologue after that false Bible statement. I know it’s hard for a brain washed mind to grasp the important truths of this video. So read the Bible, study it daily, and continue to do your research. Maybe you will be able to grasp the truth eventually. God said in his word, seek and you shall find. But, you have to want to find the truth regardless of where it leads. If you refuse to consider that your enemy could possibly be right you can never, just as Dawkins, come to the full knowledge of the truth.
The bible does NOT say that thorns came into the world ONLY after man sinned. Clearly plants have thorns to protect themselves from normal herbivores, which were around before man was created or the Garden of Eden saga played out. The thorns curse relates to man's gardening environment.
Perfect, now AiG finally agree with geologist since 150 years that the layers around upright fossils does not take millions of years to create
The Flood logically explains fossils and geological formations. While all carcasses are eaten away within days, this means that the evolutionist story of dead animals getting slowly buried under earth layers during millions of years must be nonsense. All fossils have come about as the consequence of a great geological catastrophe (the Flood) which buried animals suddenly when they were still alive.
A single flood event would jumble them all together, not sort them by faunal succession which is how they're sorted. It would also not create distinct layers that require different environmental conditions to form. What it would do is wipe out all life on Earth forever just from the heat, and there are a multitude of other reasons the Ark story doesn't work. @@jounisuninen
@@nathancook2852 they took enough food for the first year after the food?
And baby elephants
It’s sad to see that so many people take this information at face value without using a shred of logic or reason
This information is very logical and reasonable. Atheists are the ones who accept "information" at face value using a shred of logic or reason.
Great explanation, observable science verifies scripture and debunks darwinism.
@@Moist._Robot yep
Noist-Robot seemingly doesn't understand simple chemistry which is why s/he/it truly believes that no intelligence is required to form DNA. Perhaps Moist-Robot would like to demonstrate how that happens - after all it requires no intelligence therefore it should be a simple thing for an intelligent mind to organize such a demo.
@Moist._Robot then you have no problem providing the proof of your research here. I'm excited to see it.
@@soonertee he can't, everybody here knows it. Sad thing about robots is they only follow what they're programmed to do. Fortunately he only pretends to be a robot. So exposure to the truth can still open his eyes.
@@Moist._Robot it's never been debunked because it is impossible to disprove factual information.
Everyone needs to read the last chapter in his famous book. You'll see even he didn't believe what he was writing on the origin of species.
Liar.
You're a liar.
Having read Origin of Species by Darwin, as well as Life, Its Nature Origin and Development by Oparin, I can tell you that a) Darwin did indeed find the basis for species, and that b) Oparin's work did indeed confirm it. (You know, that inconvenient scientific standard.)
🧢
One difference I note between most science based videos and most (not all, most) Bible based science is that scientist tend to say this is our best knowledge which is open to even better knowledge. Where most Bible based science videos say this proves we are absolutely right beyond any question. Interesting. Thus scientist tend to think they could be wrong. While the Bible based science says no possible way we are wrong.
Great video!
Proclaiming themselves wise they became as fools..
Actually today they proclaim the fools as wise to get the majority vote. The average westerm educated have more genders than IQ points.
Someone should sometime see if there is fossils found in Mt st Helen's mud flows to debunk wrong views of how long it takes to make a fossil
So, you do believe in science! That is what science does, goes looking for evidence of whether our present hypothesis is right or wrong.
And David, if the science says that you are wrong, and really does take a long time to make a fossil, you still going to believe in your 2000 year old fairy tales? Of course you will, better to remain ignorant than having to accept that your dogma is seriously flawed.
Yeah except there’s no fossils at Mt. Saint Helens. It’s impossible, so good luck on your fruitless journey.
@@betsieswartz
With any luck, he will be there when thing blows again.
There aren't fossils there because everyone and everything ran except one old guy in a cabin.
To the atheist, does information emerge by itself? If so how would you know it didn’t originate from a mind? After reading this do you assume that someone accidentally generated this by randomly hitting letters on a keyboard or do you automatically assume I intentionally typed this and how would you know?
Yep for someone who thinks God is irrelevant they sure like to come to Bible study a lot.
I know based on experience how these letters appeared. I am willing to honestly admit that I do not know how everything came to be.
@@toldyouso5588
We do this in the hope that we can change your warped view of reality. Unfortunately you people have learned to vote and breed.
@@JB-yb4wn Your fault your side didm't learn that abortng ypur own kids isn't great for your voter species. Is that supposed to be your evolution strategy? Don't come to us with your Molech issues.
@@stevepierce6467 I was a biology major and im convinced that natural selection is at work for weeding out bad genes but I can’t find a naturalistic explanation for how information is created. I also don’t see any convincing evidence for abiogenesis or how life can spontaneously assemble from non living matter. There’s other major problems with evolutionary theory but I find these two the most bothersome having to do with the information problem.
Evolution has nothing to say on the origin of life. Why attack Evolution with something completely irrelevant
Please may you change the title of this video so that it is less aggressive? I would like to send it to my family but i dont want to offend them
AIG is constantly trying to score points with its supporters with such disparaging titles. It's really embarrassing!
As an atheist this hardly makes an impression other than the utter desperation for those from the borrowed fiction of the supernatural deity.
The heavens are silent the promised return has failed. It is folly, this fable.
Your comment has no debunking, just meaningless words.
Folly and fable is what I would describe what you typed above.
"The heavens are silent the promised return has failed. It is folly, this fable."
Let me quote Bible.
2. Peter's letter, chapter 3, verses 3-6 and 9-10: 3Most importantly, you must understand that in the last days scoffers will come, scoffing and following their own evil desires.a 4“Where is the promise of His coming?” they will ask. “Ever since our fathers fell asleep, everything continues as it has from the beginning of creation.”
5But they deliberately overlook the fact that long ago by God’s word the heavens existed and the earth was formed out of water and by water, 6through which the world of that time perished in the flood.
9The Lord is not slow in keeping His promise as some understand slowness, but is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish but everyone to come to repentance.
10But the Day of the Lord will come like a thief. The heavens will disappear with a roar, the elements will be destroyed by fire, and the earth and its works will be laid bare.
Matthew chapter 24, verses 37-39:
37As it was in the days of Noah, so will it be at the coming of the Son of Man. 38For in the days before the flood, people were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, up to the day Noah entered the ark. 39And they were oblivious, until the flood came and swept them all away. So will it be at the coming of the Son of Man.
Even if you took all his claims at face value, he did nothing to show creationism to be true. This video is just Ken putting out false understanding of how science works to try & debunk evolution, then asserting that creationism is therefore the only other explanation.
I am a Christian just simply earnestly seeking the truth, can you elaborate?
@@Yipper64 I can't remember every point Ken makes in this video, but a decent example is when he brings up dating methods of the Earth. He claims that around 90% of dating method can't get billions of years. Then gives the example of how carbon dating can't date past 50,000 years.
Well yes carbon dating alone cannot give us the age of the earth (assuming its over 50,000 years old). We can cross compare carbon 14 dating to other forms of dating methods such as ice sheets, tree rings, plate tectonics, other forms of radiometric dating & to even known dates of ancient events (i.e. Mt Vesuvius eruption) to find out how accurate these dating methods are to each other. This allows us to know that these methods of dating are consistent with each other & we can use longer & longer dating methods to measure the age of things. Using U-Pb dating, we have around 4.5 billion years worth of half-life decay. This is 1 of the several ways how we know the age of the earth.
Ken didn't necessarily discredit carbon dating in this video, but even with just carbon 14 dating alone we can preclude creationism if we have any half-life dates older than 6 thousand years.
A common counter point creationist give is that decay rates maybe used to be faster, but if you had the 4.5 billion years of decay we have crammed into the time span of only 6,000 years, you would create enough heat to melt off the crust of the earth.
You seem like a person with genuine curiosity, & I'm not attacking Christianity or God. Creationism is a misguided interpretation of the bible that is simply not compatible with our observations of the universe.
@@tone9358 Ok so that is just his carbon dating point, which I get, but honestly it gets so complex I cant be sure. Its just in general radiometric dating requires some kind of assumption of how much of the original isotope was there, which can change the result. And then if that type of thing is used for a basis of say ice sheets, then that would make the ice sheets flawed.
I think that whole thing could easily have the issue of them kind of circularly proving each other, because if you have a flawed reference point, then use that to determine one method and then the next, and all that, then all of the dating methods are using the wrong reference point.
As a random side note, I did notice he kind of mis-represented Richard Dawkin's argument, so im with you if you would bring that up. He was indulging the hypothetical, not agreeing with it.
Here's the big thing for me, as it has more specifically to do with my faith then the science itself, and that's his later point, being that sin causes death, and death could not have happened before man, but of course, going off all of this, you find death before man.
I just dont think as a Christian you can believe in evolution at least, something has to give because these two concepts contradict eachother, natural selection requiring death and all. The closest I can see is the idea of genesis being a metaphor of some kind but "its a metaphor" is a very sloppy way to interpret the bible when you dont understand something, and again as shown in the video Jesus clearly did not treat Genesis in that way. Amongst other issues with that interpretation.
I would also note that, even as explained in the video, the bible never states how old the earth is, young earth creationism is just predicated on the assumptions of lifespan and that kind of thing. So I am open to at least the concept of; 7 days didnt mean literally 7 days.
That is pretty much the only thing im currently willing to budge on at this moment, if push comes to shove. Because basically, the bible has proven itself to me, much of so called science has not.
I know you may think that's backwards, but it isnt to me.
I would like to hear your thoughts on the flood explanations, because it explains the layers and such being made in a much shorter amount of time due to a larger quantity of water. It seems to make sense but also logically more water doesnt JUST mean that it does more things, at least, that was my thought before the brought up the effects of the volcano creating those canyons by making those mud flows happen. Unless they are misleading people, those mud flows show that a canyon can in fact take a lot less time then those dating methods would assume.
@@Yipper64
There are core samples with layers are trapped organic matter.
The carbon dating and layer counts match up pretty well.
THAT is not circular.
And as for the flood. You don't reach that conclusion without starting with it. And the amount of energy required for what some Creationists talk about would melt the Earth.
You have to wake up to see what he’s talking about. Please wake up ❤
I’m trying to find the logic in saying that the very same flood that laid down the layers of sediment or rock of the Grand Canyon, was then, somehow almost simultaneously washed out by that same flood water. Honey, that doesn’t make sense.
23:58 … or death was part of the natural process, before humans.
Show me evidence, outside the Bible, that sin brought death into the world, and you will have my full attention.
"Destroys... " 😂 Yea, sure...
There's a very good reason why we are taught about gravity & evolution in science class... They both have mountains of evidence backing them.
The gravity of ignoring God who created all things, is very deep. It's as logical and respectful as a child rejecting his parents because he wants to be his own boss. I think that in fact very little about gravity is taught in any school classes.
Such effort to retain the rights to believe in a place that is wrong in every sense, makes nothing right, no justice or justification, just vengeance.
The dirtiest, most disgusting thing we were ever asked to believe. Now in order to witness, give testimony for our faith, is to find and condemn those worthy of spending an eternity in torment. We can’t honestly think of one person that really deserves that, so we pretend to trust God will do that. Makes our life complete and beautiful. Sickening what religion forces us to pretend. Just for the honor of peers.
True
This man is a walking W
Well done, very informative and accurate.
Maybe if it’s Opposite Day ig
@@leroyjenkins3744 please enlighten us with your intellect.
@@donniegreenpastorofgraceby5475who said anything about my intelligence? I’m just saying the information within the video is neither informative nor accurate.
@@leroyjenkins3744 then you can enlighten us with your proof and intellect of this subject. If you disagree merely because you were taught differently or you heard it a different way ok share, or don’t blindly object without knowledge why but you just cannot accept the premise of the information. So with waited breath explain how it is wrong don’t just merely say oh this is wrong bring proof or merely say it’s against your feelings.
Scientifically, none of the information provided here can be disputed by any proof. So, this video makes a clear statement and you can can I don’t believe it because it hurts my feelings or what someone else said or taught but you cannot not say this information is wrong based on knowledge or science.
@@donniegreenpastorofgraceby5475look man I didn’t want to write a wall of text, but since you want it so badly then here you go.
I have degrees in biology and biochemistry. I know the inter-workings of DNA pretty well seeing as how it’s my field of study. DNA is described as a language by Ken here. This is not entirely accurate or true. The genetic code can be thought of as a language that we read but that is only we have assigned language-like aspects to it. This is because DNA “language” is physical properties of DNA not a language that conveys abstract information. That’s like calling the color of a car in a lineup at a dealership a language. The letters associated with DNA provide different shapes and binding opportunities for enzymes to conform to. Think of it like a boulder falling down a hill and landing in a hole big enough for the boulder. You wouldn’t say that the rock knew it would land in that spot nor that the spot was a language for the rock or that the spot was made for said rock. It just happens to fit. This is similar to how enzymes interact with DNA. Of course now, over the course of millions of years enzymes have been selected for the ability to better bind to DNA. That was done by little mistakes in the process of crating proteins. That’s what we call mutations. Mutations can be deleterious, advantageous, or silent and in this case they are advantageous. It’s not a language.
Also the clip of Richard Dawkins is taken out of context and cut in a way to make him look bad.
Ken does nothing but pure uneducated propaganda on this channel. He makes fallacy after fallacy and keeps on going. It is not informative nor accurate information.
The atheist view is that there is no convincing evidence that god exists. Your inability to understand scientific concepts does not convince the atheist that god exists.
The atheist view is that there is no evidence that your could ever present that would make me believe in God. Lol Your unwillingness to explore other options rather than a chance occurrence of life coming from nothing does not disprove the existence of God.
@@cobyrobins973 There is more evidence for evolution than there is for God.
@xfiles4792 The evidence for God IS the same as evolution. The only differences are realistically methodology and credit.
Science can't . Your mama swung in the trees? Hahaha . Observable evidence ding dongs!
Why are the fossiils on each layer different? If everything died at the same time
Certain species could've died out before the others (within a certain time period)
@KGrace0001 so while all the dinosaurs were dying, not one single rabbit copped it. Not one single mammoth. And not one single human. Its quite convenient that every mammoth on the whole earth managed to survive longer than every single dinosaur
@KGrace0001 bear in mind they all died in 40 days
@Who_IsLike_God you have completely missed the point. Why did they die in separate layers if they were all in the same place. Animals in the higher layers do not appear in the lower layers. Are we to believe that everything died in a specific order
@Who_IsLike_God you are not engaging honestly. I am talking about fossils that are found in the same geographical location but different layers. But I think you know that.
If you are not going to address this honestly then I am done sorry
2:36 What came first: hen or egg? Information or language? Cars or steets?
07:25 crickets 😅
We loved the Creation Museum!
You loved being lied and propagandized to?
@@Censoredbyyourcult
They were commenting on the large windows the museum has for licking, also they have better tasting red crayons apparently.
@@Censoredbyyourcult NO, actually, that would be You, dear
Friend!
@@JB-yb4wn Your 5th--grade comment exposes how LITTLE you
Know of the Subject, my undereducated friend!
@@raygsbrelcik5578
Try me, I know this stuff better than you. Tell me how the Egyptians missed the flood memo. Tell me who in Noah's crew had DNA markers for Inuit, Australian aborigine, or even Tolmec traits.
Waiting for your inane answer.
The ardent evolutionist will keep adhering to the mythical belief no matter what logic is put to him or her. They prefer belief in the Age of Rocks to believing in the Rock of Ages. They hate Him without cause.
Even evolutionists know there are alternative creation stories to the one in the Bible. However, they choose to believe in the Abyss after life instead of continuing in Glory. It makes me wonder how many evolutionist atheists choose this way because their life is miserable and they feel they would have to mend their ways in order to continue in Glory. So instead they choose to believe in the Abyss.
The ardent creationist will keep adhering to the mythical belief no matter what logic is put to him or her.
@@tone9358 What logic? You mean how you came from a rock? Surely pride is for fools!
@@Mannwhich who said we came from rocks? I know a someone however who thinks we came from mud
@@tone9358 You need someone made from mud to think for you? That says more about you, than it does him. 😆
What was the reason for flooding earth and killing everyone?
they was bad
@@poundtrader1414Babies were bad?
and you are good? @@poundtrader1414
How about just punishing the bad?
The evidence for a god (there are so many) is as strong as the evidence for unicorns and tooth fairies.
Do you say that because you believe in the modern mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, and that if you just wait a long enough *time* then puddles of chemicals can fizz into people by chance? I notice that *for some reason you live in contrast to the atheistic "we're all just chemicals" belief system, but perfectly in line with everything the God you reject said about you instead as a valuable human being made in His image and likeness - why do you do that?* That is powerful evidence you can see in yourself that God created you, and that you're not just "meaningless evolved protoplasm" in a meaningless chemical universe that doesn't care about you, and I love that He put that into you so you can see clear evidence in yourself that He exists.
God said you are a meaningful and valuable human being made in His image and likeness (Genesis 1:27), with a purpose and a unique capacity for "dominion" over creation as you sit here typing this (Genesis 1:26), morality and a sense of justice (Genesis 9:6), a sense of dignity and respect towards others (James 3:10), a capacity for free will rational thinking and decision making (Genesis 2:16), and a conscience which reflects the principles of His law (Romans 2:15), among other things. These are observable qualities that we all observe in you, and being made in God's image and likeness makes perfect sense of that.
How do you explain these qualities of the image and likeness of God in you from your own worldview? For example, *is "rape" always wrong in your worldview, or is it sometimes morally permissible - and why?* Where does that come from in your worldview? Animals do it all the time, it's "normal" - it's "natural" - and we're just "evolved animals," right? Chemical reactions destroy each other all the time, it's "normal" - it's "natural" - and who cares - we're "just chemicals," right? What's the difference...?
*"They show that the requirements of the law are written on their hearts, their consciences also bearing witness, and their thoughts sometimes accusing them and at other times even defending them."* (Romans 2:15)
@@kpkpm3604 So then you just admitted that human beings are not evolved animals, thus evolution is false at this point - remember that the next time an evolutionist says we are evolved apes, or 'we are fish' (PZ Myers), etc. As for "genocide," that's just a common lie - do you say that because you think it should be okay to sacrifice babies in the red hot metal hands of their statues as they do unspeakable things with animals in public...? What you call "genocide" actually had nothing to do with 'race" at all, consider Rahab and her "race." Also God said: *"Whoever steals a man and sells him, and anyone found in possession of him, shall be put to death"* (Exodus 21:16), that alone shows you don't know what you're talking about in regards to "slavery" my friend.
But there's a much more glaring issue here... as someone who believes you are "just chemicals" or "meaningless evolved protoplasm" in a meaningless universe (Huxley), *How do you get from meaningless goo to meaningful and valuable you just by adding time + chemicals + chance in a meaningless universe?* Everything you're doing here is ironically an example of a very Christian-Atheism, as you perfectly live out all the qualities I listed above of God's image and likeness programmed into you; it all makes sense from a biblical worldview. Nothing you're doing makes any sense from a "we're all just chemical accidents" worldview, my chemical reaction friend.
You actually can't have "morality" in your worldview as a meaningless chance chemical reaction in a meaningless universe (ie. an Atheist), you just haven't logically thought through this. Every time you recognize something as beautiful, valuable, lovely, "good" - you are borrowing that from God's image and likeness programmed into you, not from your "meaningless chemical accident evolved protoplasm universe," and I love that He put that into you because that is powerful evidence even you can see in yourself that He exists.
*"The long and short of it is that I became convinced that atheism implies amorality; and since I am an atheist, I must therefore embrace amorality... The religious fundamentalists are correct: without God, there is no morality. But they are incorrect, I still believe, about there being a God. Hence, I believe, there is no morality."* (Joel Marks, Professor Emeritus of Philosophy, University of New Haven, "Philosophy Now," Sep 2010).
It’s truly a shame to see so many shackled by myth.
Indeed, may we be free from Darwinian theory once and for all.
Yes. especially the myths of abiogenesis and atheism.
Bless your heart, sweet summer child. Give this whole thing 1000 more years, and there won't be many religious people left. Unfortunately, I have to life in a world where this is not the case unfortunately 😢
How's that working out for us? Since the 1960's we've rejected God, and our young people in 2023 can't even tell us what a woman is.
@@TheSaintFrenzy these people have the same degenerate level of ideology as a religious person from the 1600s
@@TheSaintFrenzy Apparently it's the Creationists who keep insisting that Science is wrong. That sex isn't the same as gender, that biology is wrong when it states that a XX chromosome pair equates to a female while an XY pair equates to a male. Those Atheists I'm aware of, all accept the general science position. (And it's the Marxist/Socialist/Communist that want to destroy the school systems.)
Amen AIG. DNA has encoded information in it. Random chance and mutations cannot produce that. Its a silly thing to think creation came about without the hand of God. 🙂🙏✝️
Good job evolution includes natural selection then, so it's not "random chance".
@@richardgregory3684 natural selection or microevolution is not something creationists disagree with. It is a far cry from saying one species over millions of years became another one.
@@christtheonlyhope4578 Then you must agree that it is not "random chance". "Microevolution" and "macroevolution" are creationist inventions. Unable to deny that living things do indeed change through successive generations, they yet seek to deny speciation. In reality, there is only evolution,and small changes through many generations leads to large change, including new species. I suspect you next excuse will be something about "kinds", whatever those are supposed to be.
@@richardgregory3684 as the other guy said, microevolution isnt something creationists disagree with, that part is obviously observable. Every time a virus mutates, the massive variety of dog breeds, all that type of thing.
But here's the thing, natural selection still requires the base DNA for it to mutate and change, so it doesnt prove where it came from the in the first place, that's the point.
@@Yipper64 "Micro" and "macro" evolution are just creationist inventions, the more sane among them cannot deny the obvous, but they still want to cling to the bible, so they accept bacteria change but refuse to accept that existing species can produce new ones. Evolution has never sought to explain the origin of life. That is just the god of the gaps argument. Science doesn;lt know with any great certainty how life got started, although there are some good hypotheses. The origin of life is almost certainly chemistry, starting with relatively simple self-replicating molecules. The moment you get those (and yes, we pobserve those forming naturally), evolution through natural selection kicks in. The very earliest "life" was probably not even DNA based, but more likely, RNA.
Basic misunderstanding that just because the 4 basic nucleotides are identified as letters means that dna is like a language.
Thats the human curse. Always trying to simplify complex situations in ways that we can comprehend. Even if the conclusion we’ve come to contradicts the facts of the situation. Sometimes facts feel so incomprehensible that we must believe someone’s in control. Humans biggest fear is the unknown and religion is a direct result of that fear. Its more comforting to believe someones pulling the strings
This Video DESTROYS the Atheistic Worldview... the only way to destroy «atheism worldview« is a video that show one god!
...or show one near complete missing link.
@@toldyouso5588 you have no idea what evolution is.
@@luish1498 Everyone knows what evolution is, all the schools have force fed it, the government and media bombards us with it.
Brrainwashing may have worked on you but not on all of us.
@@toldyouso5588 what is evolution ?
@@luish1498 the biggest grift in accademia
How could anyone even get close to refuting any of this? This is THE logical position and the correct one. Everything points towards Creator, Jesus Christ is Lord! Amen 🙏🏽👑
even if it did point towards a creator, you cannot claim it was The Christian god. What about Allah? or Buddha?
@@themachine9000 Why don't you pray to God and ask Him to make the truth known to you? There is only one God; the Creator is Jesus Christ. Currently, your sins separate you from Him, and if you die in that state, you will spend eternity in Hell, separated from Him and all that is good. Your loving Creator does not want that to happen to you. That is why you've been given this message, and why He sent Jesus to die in your place. When you acknowledge Him as your savior and turn from your sins, He will make you new; He will give you a new heart, and new understanding. Repent and trust in Him, while you still can.
---all in love
@@themachine9000 that’s what research and discovering the truth is all about… it can’t be the Muslim God because one hour of research disputes that, and same with Buddha, nothing refutes Jesus, I’ve never once heard a legit response when asking someone to refute or discredit Jesus, they can’t because he’s perfect.
@@joelercoaster Amen. It's all about Jesus.
Okay, let's test this. Tell me what you consider to be the strongest piece of evidence for creation in this video, and I'll see if I can refute it.
Amen
Amen to your amen.
It doesn't help his argument to have a mouth-breather sitting in the front row.
Morality is not objective. It's as simple as that.
@Who_IsLike_God humans are highly developed and we have consciousness that overrides our instincts and makes decisions. We are also a highly social species. We make choices about what is the right way to behave. When that is done altruistically we think of it as a moral choice. But everyone has their own distinct view of what is right and wrong that is as distinct as a fingerprint. Just listen to any coffee shop debate for evidence of this. Certain things like murder have such a strong consensus that they are enshrined in law. But even here there are plenty of sociopaths and psychopaths who see nothing wrong in murder. Were they created in gods image? On other lesser issues there is even less consensus. Ask 10 people in a bar if it's OK to test perfume on animals and you'll see what I mean.
My conclusion is that even though there is overwhelming consensus on acts like murder, morality itself does not have an objective standard
@Who_IsLike_God no I don't think morality is defined by majority. I think morality is completely personal. Enforcement of certain morals through the law is decided by majority in order to protect society from people who's moral code is deemed harmful.
Over time our morality has changed. In a more tribal time it was probably thought good to bump off the chief of the neighbouring village and take over all their possessions. As society has become more cooperative and global we have extended our altruistic feelings beyond the immediate confines of our village. This kind of fluid view of morality can't happen if it's an unchanging moral law.
As for your last example. I believe that rape is wrong. And I would like to hope the men on the island would think the same. But nature and the universe would care not one jot. Its not objective in that sense
@Who_IsLike_God that is correct. There is no objective good and bad. There always has to be a subjective start point. You can say that good improves wellbeing and bad the opposite. But the decision to make wellbeing the goal is subjective.
You can choose to base good and bad on the bible but that is still just someone's opinion. You think it's a god. I say the bible was written by man and any morality preached in it comes from man. Either way its still subjective
@@Who_IsLike_Godwhat? The first part of the responce suggests that phycopathy or anti social or lack of emotion is all socialisation and not ya know a serious mental issue that can happen to people of all backrounds even religious.
Plunty of serieal killers had religious backrounds
@@mattbrook-lee7732if all morality is objective and religion grounds all morality why even within religion does morality change so drastically?
All Christians should all belive in the same moral princibles if that was true but we all know its not whats moral to a Protestant might not be moral to a Catholic.
Millennia later: no scientific evidence for origin of life.
Evidence for God? Life 😊
100%
Amen.
This is called a non sequitur, & is a logical fallacy
@@tone9358 yes you just committed it.
well done.
@@HS-zk5nn You 've just commit the intellectual equivalent of "I know you are but what am I?"
As an Atheist, I never knew I had an 'Atheistic Worldview'. I always figured Atheism was just a lack of belief in any god.
The very fact that anything exists at all is more evidence of a creator than the lack of one. When someone tells me to prove there’s a God, I say, “just look around.” And there is no way to prove that there is no God. The further you look up or down, the more dangerous you will find it to be. We only have this thin slice of all of existence in which we can survive… and I no longer believe that all of this could come just from trillions upon trillions upon trillions of random accidents. (Look up: Levinthal’s Paradox.)
Lol it’s impossible not to have a philosophical worldview. Just because you never fleshed it out, doesn’t mean that you don’t have one. Although atheism would only be part of someone’s worldview.
@@JoeBuck-uc3bl Whether I believe in a god or not, I'm still going to act the same.
Why dont we see half formed evolved creatures walking amoungst us,
OH,, thats right We Have Politicians..😅
Public education has become a scary place to send your children. Its so sad some parents don't have the possibility to do otherwise.
Dawkins is even more hopeless in his second answer than in his first. The second answer showed how foolish he was. At least the first one when he was silent, he, just seemed ignorant.
I know right!!... Humans were created by an other-worldly super intelligence... It's that EXACTLY what God is?
Excellent!
No
Atheism is not a world view. Its simply the non belief in any gods. Period.
Ok 🤣🤣🤣.
Atheism can indeed be considered a worldview when it forms part of a broader framework of beliefs and perspectives on fundamental questions about existence, morality, meaning, and the nature of reality. While atheism itself is simply the absence of belief in gods, individuals who identify as atheists often have a distinct set of beliefs and values that shape their understanding of the world, making atheism a component of their overall worldview.
02:00 that's actually amazing
😮 I think I heard you say, after Adam and Eve sinned,God created thorns and thistles, but after He created man He rested. God cursed the land to make the thorns more abundant and the land needing man to work to produce food.
Yet when you call out the moral attrocities of Misotheists, they will say they had nothing to do with it.