Prostate Cancer with "Cribriform Architecture"

[@eduardosanojacastellano9402]

Gracias por estas charlas, siempre las estoy visitando para refrescar la memoria

[@theyeetboyz6838]

Thank you for this detailed insight about the entity

[@rajalbshahExperturologicpath]

Thank you very much, David! I appreciate your feedback and sharing with your colleagues.

[@joeax61]

Can we please get the Transcript in English?

[@SandhyaRamachandran]

Thank you. At 15:19, what would be the correct Gl score-3+4 = 7or "3+3 =6 with ext intraductal spread".

[@rajalbshahExperturologicpath]

I would call 3+3 with extensive intraductal component

[@rajalbshahExperturologicpath]

Keep in mind that two societies as have somewhat different recommendations. I try to emphasize on those points and also mention what would be the practical approach in different scenarios

[@SandhyaRamachandran]

Thank you. So shd we put a comment to that effect in our report n discuss with the urologist..

[@rajalbshahExperturologicpath]

@@SandhyaRamachandran Proper communication is critical!

[@SandhyaRamachandran]

@@rajalbshahExperturologicpath Thank you!

[@LaureneSmith-s4c]

My husband has Gleason 7 3+4 Criboform 4. One surgeon wanted to take it out, and another wants to radiate. With criboform in your opinion what is the best way

[@LaureneSmith-s4c]

No intraductal no mets