Is there any difference? Waves API 2500 vs UAD API 2500 vs Lindell SBC

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 7 июл 2024
  • Is there an actual difference between these 3? Let's find out in this video .
    💜 Neold U17 Review: • The analog compressor ...
    💜 Get 7% off for your first year on Distrokid by clicking here!: distrokid.com/vip/whitenoises...
    💜Get great vocals with 10% off on your www.vocalfy.com purchase with code WHITENOISE10
    Get them here:
    WAVES Api 2500: waves.alzt.net/15BzEz
    UAD API2500: www.pluginboutique.com/produc...
    Lindell SBC: www.plugin-alliance.com/en/pr...
    Plugin Deals - updated 21 June 2024
    All of these links are affiliate and help to support this channel 😊
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Free Plugin with every Plugin Boutique paid purchase:
    Rhodes V-Pan or Krotos Dehumaniser Simple Monsters
    www.pluginboutique.com/?a_aid...
    Lowest prices ever on Newfangled Audio and Eventide plugins:
    eventideinc.pxf.io/ZQgA2K
    Karanyi Sounds sale - up to 51% off:
    www.pluginboutique.com/meta_p...
    Univ
    Wavesfactory Trackspacer $41:Bundle
    www.pluginboutique.com/produc...
    Native Instruments Massive $19:
    www.pluginboutique.com/produc...
    IK Multimedia Intro Sale - up to 83% off:
    www.pluginboutique.com/deals/...
    KIIVE plugins up to 50% off:
    www.kiiveaudio.com/collection...
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    00:00 Intro
    00:15 Phase Inversion test
    00:41 Differences between the 3 API2500 plugins
    02:17 The specific THRUST circuit
    03:40 Comparing medium settings with feed forward
    04:27 Manual output gain
    04:43 FeedBack
    05:30 The LOUD thrust
    06:26 Lindell THD settings
    06:54 Using more extreme settings
    08:20 Conclusions
    #wavesaudio #uadplugins #pluginalliance
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    White Noise Studio Links:
    Website: www.whitenoisestudio.com
    Facebook: / whitenoisestudiowinter...
    Instagram: / whitenoisestudio
    White Noise Sessions: / @whitenoisesessions

Комментарии • 80

  • @whitenoisestudio
    @whitenoisestudio  Год назад +3

    Which of the 3 is your favorite and why?

    • @palinoman
      @palinoman Год назад +2

      UAD. Because I have it (in Spark).

    • @whitenoisestudio
      @whitenoisestudio  Год назад +2

      @@palinoman good reason ;-)

    • @grungefire
      @grungefire Год назад +1

      UAD too. That’s what I have and use. Happy with it. Just got the Lindell but haven’t tried it yet.

    • @whitenoisestudio
      @whitenoisestudio  Год назад

      Why

    • @whitenoisestudio
      @whitenoisestudio  Год назад +2

      You have a api2500 hardware? Seems like you have hardware which can be as shitty as the worst analog plugin or absolute heaven. Hardware in itself means nothing. And you have know that UAD’s platform at a time was very valuable, when CPU’s couldn’t cope with all the load.

  • @DavidMaximMicic
    @DavidMaximMicic Год назад +12

    Loved the video! :)
    I've found that the reason you can't get a better Null between Lindel and the other two is the oversampling. If you turn the oversampling off on Lindel you'll get a much better Null.
    Both UAD and Waves seem to be calibrated at -17dBFS so switching Lindell to -17 will result in beter comparison too. :)
    Also, it seems like -2db of gain redaction on Lindell equals to -4db of gain reduction on UAD, VU meter. That seems odd to me, but I'd love to see someone clarify that if they've done further testing on these two. 😶

    • @whitenoisestudio
      @whitenoisestudio  Год назад +3

      Thanks! Yeah there are some weird differences. Nice you found out about the calibration! With the lindell dpr902 there are some wird things with its calibration as well, goes in to ugly distortion if you have the wrong calibration.
      I found out about VU meter differences as well. It does not line up with the other two.

  • @bangubw736
    @bangubw736 Год назад +12

    Lindell is my favorite. It has replaced the waves version on my mixes. I love the nuke mode absolutely beautiful

    • @whitenoisestudio
      @whitenoisestudio  Год назад +4

      I agree. I prefer the lindell of the three altough its close.

    • @simmermusic3894
      @simmermusic3894 9 месяцев назад

      I have the Lindell as well, sounds nice and full, great on the mids

  • @GalestianMusic
    @GalestianMusic Год назад +2

    Great comparison. I've been using the API-2500 for a long while now, but hearing the Lindell SBC, I actually prefer that one! Maybe when the time comes for upgrades, I'll make the decision to switch. But for now, I'm used to the Waves compressor and it does the job well. I don't see myself ever going the UAD route.

    • @whitenoisestudio
      @whitenoisestudio  Год назад +3

      I wish UAD will offer the sparkx plugin as a seperate purchase option one day.

    • @brunoflores9388
      @brunoflores9388 Год назад +1

      @@whitenoisestudio today is the day

  • @flame2fame_music
    @flame2fame_music Год назад +5

    Lindell is one of my favourite plugin developers among the other, represented by Plugin - Alliance.

    • @whitenoisestudio
      @whitenoisestudio  Год назад +1

      Lindell makes nice stuff, pretty sweet 500 series hardware as well.

  • @Keroser1983
    @Keroser1983 Год назад +2

    Thank you very much man! Great video

  • @coldskoolbeatz
    @coldskoolbeatz Год назад +12

    They all sound great. I'd go with Lindell because I love the brand. I own Waves API stuff, but hate their business model so I no longer buy their plug-ins.

    • @whitenoisestudio
      @whitenoisestudio  Год назад +2

      Fair enough ;-)

    • @NealCaen
      @NealCaen Год назад

      what is their business model if you don’t mind me asking?

    • @LeGaLdeadparliament
      @LeGaLdeadparliament Год назад +3

      @@NealCaen waves update plan, which obliges you to constantly buy newer plugins or the update itself separately to renew its yearly possibility, bc they give you only a year of updates access.
      ofc, you can keep the older plugin versions.

    • @whitenoisestudio
      @whitenoisestudio  Год назад

      Its not obliged. I run v11 plugins still.

    • @LeGaLdeadparliament
      @LeGaLdeadparliament Год назад +1

      ​@@whitenoisestudio they often work until you install the newest operating system and they stop being detected then. :(
      however, I am a big fan of these plugins too, they have a lot of good stuff, just like the PuigTec EQ, CLA Compressors, SSL, API or Reinassance series.
      big props to them for F6 EQ, too sad it has not so many bands - at least, transforming F6 into an epic F16 could be a thing. :D

  • @GloveBunniesVideos
    @GloveBunniesVideos Год назад +1

    Great video. These kind of comparisons are tough because of the technology used to model these analog devices. I assume the Waves plugin is the oldest so I'm surprised how well it stood up to the others.

    • @whitenoisestudio
      @whitenoisestudio  Год назад +2

      absoltely not miles apart and you can wonder how close they will be if you add some eq and more.

  • @RiffLair
    @RiffLair Год назад +2

    UAD looks and sounds sweet indeed! The Lindell sounds great too.! I wish UAD plugins weren't locked behind a hardware unit in order to use. Such a pity.

    • @whitenoisestudio
      @whitenoisestudio  Год назад +6

      It’s isn’t anymore. UAD spark subscriptions run natively without the need of uad2 hardware and it contains this api 2500 as well.

    • @RiffLair
      @RiffLair Год назад +5

      Damn. I must have been living under a stone for a while. Thanks for letting me know.🤟

    • @jrm_music7229
      @jrm_music7229 Месяц назад

      The SSL G Bus Compressor locked behind Apollo hardware for UAD, but the API isnt locked

  • @chaddonal4331
    @chaddonal4331 Год назад +4

    Additional Factors: 3 licenses from PA/Lindell (vs. 1 for Waves), and no additional hardware requirement (as for UAD).

    • @whitenoisestudio
      @whitenoisestudio  Год назад +1

      I always simply switch the license via cloud, no issue there usually. In regard UAD you're wrong: the reason i made this comparison is because many UAD plugins now run natively as well with uad spark.

    • @chaddonal4331
      @chaddonal4331 Год назад

      @@whitenoisestudio I stand corrected.

  • @JohnSk82
    @JohnSk82 23 дня назад

    Yes there is.I have all of them including Acustica Audio's one

  • @josiahscottquinn
    @josiahscottquinn Год назад +1

    Isn’t thrust a sidechain hpf though? Just confused why UAD was not listed as having one unless that’s different from an “external” sidechain

    • @whitenoisestudio
      @whitenoisestudio  Год назад

      You're right. Thrust is a sidechain filter with 3 different selectable curves.

  • @EckertAndras
    @EckertAndras Год назад +6

    I don't hear any discernible difference. I think the cheapest version is also sufficient.

    • @whitenoisestudio
      @whitenoisestudio  Год назад +1

      I think you're pretyty much right in that observation. It will mostly come down to features.

  • @PharaohLawLess1
    @PharaohLawLess1 Год назад +5

    I have the Waves API 2500, the Lindell API SBC and the Softube version of the API compressor and eq. I created a setting for the Softube version for a drum buss that is nice. But the Lindell version has a preset (Rap nuke) that is a beast

    • @whitenoisestudio
      @whitenoisestudio  Год назад +2

      the Lindell has that nuke option which the other two dont have. feels a lot like the 1176 all buttons in option.

    • @PharaohLawLess1
      @PharaohLawLess1 Год назад +1

      @@whitenoisestudio Right

  • @FreakinOutOnAudio
    @FreakinOutOnAudio 3 месяца назад

    Things of note, that may or may not matter to anyone:
    1. The hardware 2500 is an uneven and pumpy compressor, but all 3 plugins pump worse. The hardware is famous for it's sound/transformers, not how it compresses. Anything you run through the hardware gets magic sauce poured on it. It doesn't sound like anything else on earth. The plugins unfortunately cannot do that magic sauce.
    2. The hardware and plugins are versatile, not just bus compressors, and work ok for things like kick drum for adding snap.
    3. The plugins are clicky in many situations (including this video). The hardware slightly rounds off the clicks, but it can be made to click some as well.
    4. The waves has no sound to it. It's an OK clean compressor, but there are better, less pumpy plugins.

  • @PurpleMusicProductions
    @PurpleMusicProductions 10 месяцев назад +1

    Definitely liked the UAD and Lindell versions of this plugin far more based on these examples. Waves just sounded flat and dull.

  • @MichaelJamesWood
    @MichaelJamesWood 5 месяцев назад

    Nice comparison!

  • @buddhabinaural
    @buddhabinaural Год назад +1

    I think the UAD sounds squashed everytime. It doesn't sound as open as the Waves and the Waves doesn't sound as full as the Lindell.

    • @whitenoisestudio
      @whitenoisestudio  Год назад +1

      Doesnt that have to do with the difference in input gains? That will affect threshold settings.

  • @MrMissingReel
    @MrMissingReel Год назад +1

    How many comps do we really need?

  • @hundeaux
    @hundeaux Год назад +1

    Lindell pumping nicely

  • @sgfdancecompany
    @sgfdancecompany Год назад

    UAD have oversampling by default

  • @krispybowgod9656
    @krispybowgod9656 Год назад +8

    Very similar. Waves is the most annoying company in the audio game with their business model and marketing so no thanks. UAD is always quality but wayyy over priced in 2022. Lindell and plugin alliance always are good value and don’t make you update their plugins every 6-12 months with stupid upgrade plans. Lindell for the win

    • @whitenoisestudio
      @whitenoisestudio  Год назад +4

      I dont know with all that update plan hate. I like to make a comparison with when you buy a car: who pays for the maintenance ? not the car company, its you. Also, waves doesnt force you to upgrade in anyway. If you have a working setup, there's no need to ever upgrade.

    • @suarezlifestyle
      @suarezlifestyle Год назад +4

      @@whitenoisestudio Another thing to add here, waves plugins are usually SO SO LOW PRICED..... so you buy a WAVES plugin for like $29 and then you hate on the update plan? WTF is going on.... there are some good free plugins for your new hobbie...

    • @whitenoisestudio
      @whitenoisestudio  Год назад +2

      Yeah something like that.

    • @tobiasjone
      @tobiasjone Год назад

      Also, I know waves plugins will still work in 20 years

    • @wangdeng1123
      @wangdeng1123 Год назад +4

      @@whitenoisestudio Plugins are not cars. It's nonsense to maintain them every year. "Waves doesn't force you to upgrade in any way." However, what if you upgrade your system, like macOS which often updates?

  • @BossNkeyXay
    @BossNkeyXay Год назад +2

    Omg pls play the same part of tve song if you compare them..

    • @whitenoisestudio
      @whitenoisestudio  Год назад +2

      Yes omg, what an amateur!

    • @BossNkeyXay
      @BossNkeyXay Год назад

      @@whitenoisestudio ❤️

    • @whitenoisestudio
      @whitenoisestudio  Год назад

      Hehe. You know, it's always difficult to find the balance between being educative and keeping the viewer watching.
      Ideally, a video will just have one long audio file with bypassing and some controls twiddling but that will also result in the death of a video unfortunately.

    • @NoQualmsTheArtist
      @NoQualmsTheArtist 4 месяца назад

      @@whitenoisestudioif you can't listen to the same loop for 5 mins then you shouldn't be a sound engineer 😂
      The original comments was correct even if you have a varying loop, please change the plugin as the same part of the loop is playing not when the change happens, that's the best of both worlds, or the comparison is useless.

  • @tomiarti8878
    @tomiarti8878 6 месяцев назад

    waves has most balanc