Is Daniel Haqiqatjou a Deviant? A response
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 ноя 2022
- Daniel have lied against me and other brothers, and labelled us as bootlickers simply because we are following the Quran, Sunnah & Salaf on how to deal with rulers and governments. May Allah guide him.
Tariq ibn Shihab reported: A man asked the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, “What is the best jihad?” The Prophet said, “A word of truth in front of a tyrannical ruler.”
Right, Daniel is a real unapologetic unlike these people, probably these sheikhs get Saudi funding for preaching Islam in the west so they are angry on Daniel for Criticizing Halloween sponsored by Saudi Government, if not question MBS today then tomorrow he will bring more and more liberal values in Arabia, i am with Daniel
In front of him, meaning in his presence. Not behind his back, online or hidden.
@@Rosamrisen “The master of the martyrs on the Day of Resurrection is Hamzah ibn ‘Abdul Muttalib, and a man who stands up to a tyrannical leader, prohibiting him from evil and enjoining good upon him, and he is killed for it.” - you can stand up to the ruler online using it as a resource.
@masudsaleh5155 can you show proof for these statements?
Also, what is a madkhali?
How is criticizing a pagan festival Khawaraji?
So u missed the part where he is openly criticizing the rulers and describing their actions as kufr akbar while “not labeling”?
@@K.w897 what's wrong in criticizing the Saudi prince and the king??
@@ifhamjavaidrather7620 check the ahadith about openly criticizing rulers and what the salaf said about it
@@K.w897 yeah i checked the ahadith so what I found was a woman standing against Umar r a when he declared the limit of Mahar and he repented later on so it shows that we can't rebel against a Caliph but we can question him very easily but you know what the funny part is, that mbs and his father they're not caliphs but the monarchs and the puppets
@@ifhamjavaidrather7620 the part about the women correcting him is not authentic, either u havent seen all the ahadith about obeying the muslim leader even if he is evil and doesn’t rule by the prophets ﷺ guidance, or ure willingly ignoring them, and rejecting the sunnah is kufr cause Allah swt said to refer judgement to Him and the prophet. Also how ibn Abbas RA said there’s kufr doona kufr when it comes to not ruling by sharia. And dont forget imam Ahmad saying whoever goes against the leader is an innovator, and he himself not speaking about the leader while being oppressed
The only thing DH said is that governments that openly celebrate and promote Halloween or activities that are considered haram should be not be celebrated and condoned. I dont understand why people are getting so hyped and defensive.
Qatar is being currently criticised for not allowing gay and lgbt in their countries and France made a cartoon about it, I dont see anyone talking about that? Yet YOU must attack the Muslims first, someone make this make sense.
Exactly, I'm so confused
@@isatubarrie9145 it’s not confusing. ANYONE who even hints the slightest towards of criticism towards the Saudi kingdom are blacklisted by these salafis
Ah good point
I just woke up. Idk what's going on.. all these reactions to DH from Shamsi and tiktok sheikh??
The only rational comment i found
Is it just me, or is it that the moment Daniel Haqiqatjou started talking about the Khilafah, I am now seeing videos about him being a "deviant"? Am I going crazy? Is this some coincidence?
Did you even watch the video? Don’t you know how Khawarij first started out, their first steps were questioning Muhammed SAWS himself.
@@AArrad so questioning the ruler is the same as questioning the prophet?
@@mzansitrash How did this go over your head?
The prophet himself said do not question the Muslim ruler even if he falls upon sin on sin, and vast corruption, and abuses you personally and takes away your rights. Therefore: QUESTIONING THE RULER MEANS YOU DISREGARD THE PROPHETS RULING ON THE MATTER (or QUESTION the prophet). I’m paraphrasing the Hadith, but the Hadith is valid and THERE FOR YOU TO READ AND PONDER YOURSELF.
My god… think for yourselves for one moment and never put anyone on a pedestal as if they are infallible.
@@AArrad the hadith is from sahih Muslim is not authentic
@@AArrad what?? Are you comparing prophet and this ruler
He said celebrating Halloween was paganism. Do you agree with this?
Yeah! Whats the answer
According to the sheikh if a leader is promoting any type of major sin you can't criticize and just watch your society deteriorate.
Yes it is my brother
And yet kissing a stone believing it will erase sins is not?
lmao you guys make me laugh. Love the content.
No one is celebrating halloween in saudi, if a small group did it on their own that’s their problem
Daniel Haqiqatjou didn't call for Khuruuj?
What is the problem he just rejected public munkar on public??
💯 correct. This faris guy is a puppet . What about OUR LEADER cici, or these dirt bags that are hand in hand with israel and america . Lol this guy is a puppet 💯. Most of modern scholars are are in prison because of these so called leaders so we stay quite is actually sinful act. Am
Reading these comments and all these people agreeing with him are just as lost
@@findingthetruth9036 Even though they are hard against speaking against leader and his munkar, salafiyyah is still right on Aqeedah and Fiqh issues. Because of this loyalty to their leaders we don't put them as "puppes".
10:32 described it all.
If you see a wrong doings non of your business.😳
Salafiyyah is not right in many masalas of fiqh from the Ahlus Sunnah still they claim to be right….
@@rayyanjavaid7678 It is.
May Allah guide you Farris Hammadi. How is criticising a pagan festival khawaraji.
Same guy who said Palestinians are the traitors not Israel 😂
Uae agent ur just a joke wallahi
Did he?
Who said that ???
@@toocharged yup there's a video for him on Muslim skeptic channel
@@aspire7860link?
How much is the UAE paying you?
If a ruler is promoting major sin, is it haram to criticize?
I heard this person, Hammadi, saying "Palestinians betrayed Palestine" replying to a question, why Saudi / UAE betrayed Palestine.. and I am not buying any word of wisdom from this thug..
They never criticize Aal Saud but they are the same people who supported the coup against Mohammad Morsi.
Haqiqatjou has the audacity to criticize Saudi rulers and y'all loosing your mind!
Yes because the madkhalis are munafiq murtads
It was Saudi government who supported rebelling against Morsi not us salafi ! We are same in regards to good as well as bad rulers.
Brother owais, that is the point we make, never criticized Muslim's rulers. If you don't like our advice, then at least don't put blame on us
@@udaramalam7348 "Muslim rulers" do not violate the rulings of the Quran: Ie do not allign with the enemies of Islam against Muslims AND rule by what Allah has revealed.
They are not Muslim rulers they are munafiq murtads as are those who follow them against the true righteous Muslim Ummah.
You understand?
@@TheMedicalLad you people have no connection to the true Salaf. The Salafi sect just uses the name of the Salaf to make themselves appear better than the rest of the Muslims. In reality you are just trash.
Khawarij, according to this guy: anyone who opposes Saudi family.
If faris applied the meaning the way he understands it, he has to call the Saudi family khawarij because they rebelled against the previous dynasty.
Will he do that?
No.
Sheikh Faris going by what you’re saying. ibn taymiyyah was calling for deviance when he faced the cruel rulers. Can you explain to me how Daniel is calling to deviance when talking about politics and tyrant Muslim rulers, but ibn taymiyyah isn’t.
@@JakeBrancatellaClips yeah, I saw that. Astaghfirullah. May Allah guide us all. Also, do you mean Farid or Faris
Where did ibn taymiyyah rahimahullah do khurooj against the rulers!? Bring your evidence
Wasnt ibn taymiyyah a philosopher so that's why hes seemed controversial?
@@saajiddaya2152 no rather ibn taymiyyah refuted the philosophers and defended Quran and Sunnah from their filth
@@user-be2tw4xg7x I'm looking into him rn and I'm seeing 2 opinions
1. He was a great scholar and muttaqi but his akhlaaq was atrocious
2. He claimed that Allah has a physical body and because of that hes a mushrik
I'm just gonna take the good and leave the bad, like all scholars, past and present
May Allaah guide us all and make us to understand real teaching of Quran and Sunnah
if a khariji succeeds in overthrowing a muslim ruler, do salafis have to obey the khariji as their new ruler? Thats the story of the creation of the saudi state
Responding to the question on the thumbnail of the video:
I don't think it has anything to do with khawarajism but rather everything to do with betrayal when you have a 1 trillion $ price tag for a hedonistic city line in order to fill it with who? With the people of Tawhid, or with the very same people that had a campaign against Qatar?
Now, what if MBS' satanic investment becomes a failure that leads to lgbt ultimatums and then boycotts until the line becomes a failure and bankrupts Saudi Arabia which in turn leads to the ruin of Yathrib and to the flourishing state of Jerusalem and then the Malhamah? Could MBS and his successors be those who will be swallowed up in Al-Bayda?
From Abu Hurairah رضي الله عنه who said:
وَيْلٌ لِلْعَرَبِ مِنْ شَرٍّ قَدِ اقْتَرَبَ: إِمَارَةُ الصِّبْيَانِ; إِنْ أَطَاعُوهُمْ أَدْخَلُوهُمُ النَّارَ , وَإِنْ عَصَوْهُمْ ضَرَبُوا أَعْنَاقَهُمْ
"Woe to the Arabs from an evil which has drawn near! The government of Youngsters; If they obey them (i.e. the youngsters), they will enter them into Hell-Fire, and if they disobey them, they will strike their necks."
[Musannaf Ibn Abi Shaybah # 37236 and 37751: this is a Mawquf narration]
So the objective of these rulers is not to seek Allah's ﷻ approval or the pleasure of the believers, rather they seek the approval of disbelievers of the west. We have to be honest and say that their intentions and objectives are seeking the approval of born out of fornication atheists, tattooed pagan homosexual disbelievers of the west who are enemies of Islam and Muslims. And they go about doing that with the utmost and cruelest inhumane things to poor and desperate Muslims that end up committing suicide after taking their passports and not paying their wages. All in order to get that approval of who? Of Kuffar, until Allah ﷻ made those very same kuffar whose approval they sought enraged with them:
Narrated 'Aishah رضي الله عنها:
The Messenger of Allah ﷺ said:
"Whoever seeks Allah's Pleasure by the people's anger, Allah will suffice him from the people. And whoever seeks the people's pleasure by Allah's Anger, Allah will entrust him to the people."
[Sunan at-Tirmidhi » Chapters On Zuhd » Hadith 2414]
And these hypocrites only reform when the disbelievers of the west whose intentions is to spread corruption in the land say: _"human rights."_ But when "Allah ﷻ said" or "Rasulullah ﷺ said" is mentioned to them, it has no effect. They sit on the wealth of Islam that should've been used to restore our armies, to spread Tawhid and rectify and defeat the Ahlul Bid'ah and spread Islam throughout the world with Jihaad.
Instead under their rule we have concentration camps in Palestine by our eternal enemy the jew and gitmos by the united snakes polytheist crossworshippers, and cow/rat worshippers persecuting Muslims in india, icon worshipping russians pulverizing Syria and dog eating idolaters in china putting Muslims in camps. Most of the enemies gathered against us are a direct result of the jew. If they can't fix the conditions, then they should respectfully step down and allow those who can fix it to replace them. Because these will generate a generation of munafiqeen until the jews attack them and then they'll find themselves having no believers protecting them. They couldn't even defeat houthis in Yemen but only harmed masakeen.
Our enemies like the nationalists sufis of Turkiye build their own drones and weapons, and the raafidah shi'a majoos (iran) who are heavily sanctioned build their own drones and weapons, whereas our rulers the Sunnis of the gulf states are busy with hedonistic cities and squandering our wealth in order to seek the approval of kuffar until weasels like usury eating jews, licentious women, homosexuals and gender changers who are the weakest of creatures in human history with no traces on this planet, are testing the world and corrupting it due to the respite that pushing buttons in warfare gave them. They become bold because there's no Muslim army checking the forces of the shaytan until aids spreading homosexuals became bold enough to spread their filth in Qatar and argue that they have the moral high ground, Subhan-Allah. That's how they became a magnet for khurooj.
Therefore I tell the hot blooded young Muslim men in the west to not go down the khurooj path lest you become a target for the madakhila. Rather making a deal with the white disbelievers of the west that are also enemies of the jews and lgbt and licentious women, in return for their demographics will actually lead us to a brand new country from scratch for our people. I tell them to detach themselves from these foreign countries whose ways you don't understand and whom you can't relate with. Because doing that will protect Muslims from being displaced and also protect us from having people who do not share our values and mindset amidst us. On top of that, we have millions of converts to think about. Therefore my plan is to make a comprehensive treaty and deal with the disbelievers of the west. An example of it would be something like this:
_"O disbelievers of the west, look, these hypocrites in our part of the world do all of these sportswashing, hedonistic city building, and world cup hosting in order to seek your approval, but instead you returned that with hatred and ingratitude, so why do you not give them the influence, approval and praise that they seek with you by telling them to fund a project that will guarantee your demographics and preservation of your values, and by doing so, you'll be truly pleased with them? Hence our online government app for the Sunni western Muslims that will list all the Sunni Mosques and communities that are upon Tawhid and Sunnah from California to New Zealand, list all the future citizens therein, reach a consensus on governance, then seek membership at the OIC or the Muslim world league, and then negotiate a piece of land with one of the Muslim countries just like Rasulullah ﷺ did with tribes before his Hijrah, and once we have a territory to build on, you will get contracts for construction from that funding of theirs, and you'll hold up your end of the deal, meaning, you'll give these worthless hypocrites the objective and intention behind their actions which is having your approval and thus you get your demographics back plus money while we get our own place, and it's a win win for everyone and we separate on a civilized manner."_
If we marketed this idea in a wise and smart manner, I don't think any western disbeliever would deny it. I've tried it with the far right disbelievers and some of them agreed to the plan. It would funnel billions of dollars, establish a land for Sunni western Muslims from scratch, free from the ignorance that exists among these people and their tribalism, caste systems, racism, nifaq. Because once they go full hedonistic and approval seeking, then the scholars in those lands will need some place to make Hijrah to. And we would need all the scholars we could get to educate our people upon proper Islam.
This way we will separate the believers from the hypocrites in a smart way that doesn't involve khurooj, ikhwanism or madakhalism before Fitnah Ad-Duhayma comes that will purify the camp of Eemaan.
My plan will turn khawarijism, ikhwanism and madakhalism obsolete because such misguidance depends on the hypocrites that sit on the wealth of Islam.
@@lemortedbrian6070
1. Yes we must obey
2. Saudi state creation is not based on overthrowing government, Saudi has been exist as separate entity with Ottoman, So they are not part of Ottoman . So their war with Ottoman is not war on overthrowing's government but war of with another country .
Ameen - not the speech of the ignorant who defend the one who violates the Quran and Sunnah out of cowardice or ignorance hiding behind: you live in the West or, you don't understand...
Daniels response video - ruclips.net/video/7Xyj5s61Zg4/видео.html
So we obey and follow rulers who rule by other than the Qur'an and the sunnah? clear cut murji'ah stuff
Ibn `Abbâs رضي الله عنهما that he said that the Prophet صلَّى الله عليه وسلَّم says: “He who disapproves of something done by his ruler should be patient, for whoever deviates from the ruler even as little as a span will die as (if he were of) those who died in the pre-Islamic period [of ignorance]”(4). In another version: “Whoever notices something done by his ruler which he denies should be patient, for he who breaks away from the company of the Muslims even for a span and then dies, will die (as sinful disobedient) as those who died in the pre-Islamic period [of ignorance]”(5).
@@googleenjoyer1503 Sorry to say but this is a pathetic argument as the Hadiths mentioned and all the Hadiths regarding the ruler are in reference to a a legitimate ruler one that’s been appointed by the Muslims. There exists no appointed ruler by the Muslims today and there hasn’t been for sometime and so these arguments in favour of the ruler and not rebelling against the ruler become moot. You have no leg to stand on. The scholars of ahlus sunnah such as Al bani and uthaymeen have even made this crystal clear that this is a misapplication of the Hadith.
@@Cwizes Therefore the shuyukh agree to rebel against the ruler and promote it or do they say that we shouldn't? This time with proof.
So imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal has irjaa in your opinion? Have you read ANY of the narrations about obeying the muslim ruler?
@@googleenjoyer1503 Thefore the shuyukh in regards to the ruler being legitimate say that you can rebel in certain instances. Please bear in mind that this is a step further than what we’re talking about as what we’re actually discussing is about the misconception surrounding the legitimacy of the ruler. The sheikhs in the evidence I’m going to give go a step further by talking about how to behave when the ruler has legitimate authority. One more thing try and actually understand what I’ve said about it being assumed the ruler has legitimate authority and how arguments such as your don’t mean anything because it’s a misapplication. Head over to the channel original tawheed the video of sajid lipham that’s around 12 minutes. All evidences are provided in the video.
they criticized Al-Hasan Al-Basri when he opposed the followers of Ibn Al-Ash’ath as they attempted to rebel against the tyrannical ruler, Al-Hajjaj ibn Yusuf Al-Thaqafi. When the Khawarij perceived Al-Hasan Al-Basri’s disagreement with their misguidance and falsehood, they slandered him by saying: “Should we obey this infidel?” Furthermore, they accused him of being a loyal subject(bootlicker) to the oppressive ruler. In the end, their fate was that some of them were killed while some suffered increased dictatorship at the hands of Al-Hajjaj. (Tabaqat Ibn Sa’d 7/163).
There's a difference between a tyrant and someone who allows open shirk to take place in the heartlands of Islam
@You Jahmis are taughut lovers jealous of Saudis -
do you have Wahn like DeviI because you can't even admit you are wrong, lie on Quran 7 :28 and can't teach Islam right? Where is Allah? Why dpn't you remove your own Wahn first?
@The Madhkalis are Ahlul Bidaa and taghoot lovers.
Death is not wat we fear but the fitna that will happen. When Muslims fight amongst each other blood will follow nd destruction of land. Clear example is wat happened in the Arabian spring non off these countries recovered from wat happened nd become land of death. Is it really worth it to destroy muslim countries nd let the west play at our backyard or isn’t better to be patient nd wait for Allah to replace the bad ruler with a good one?
@themadkalimurjiasecularist6683 Ah you again the isis khawariji
@masudsaleh5155 Wallahi you are lying, we are harsh against the innovator just like the sahaba and salaf. Omar ibn Al Khattab beat the crap out of a muslim innovator and nearly killed him and imprisoned him for 1 year. You cannot refute with knowledge. Rather it is Daniel who is kind to the kuffaar and a hypocrite. Not only that, he praised isis jihadi scholars and defended them. Everything i say can be backed with evidance. You cant
Assalamualaikum wa rahmatullah. Could you please provide me the reference of where Imam bukhari mentioned that he met over a 1000 imams and said such a statement. Jazakallahu Khair
Wa alaykum as salam wa rahmatullahi wa barakaatuh.
ابن حجر في فتح الباري (1/ 60) عند شرح الحديث الثامن من كتاب الإيمان من صحيح البخاري فقال: ( وكذا نقله أبو القاسم اللالكائي في " كتاب السنة " عن الشافعي وأحمد بن حنبل وإسحاق بن راهوية وأبي عبيد وغيرهم من الأئمة ، وروى بسنده الصحيح عن البخاري قال : لقيت أكثر من ألف رجل من العلماء بالأمصار فما رأيت أحدا منهم يختلف في أن الإيمان قول وعمل ، ويزيد وينقص .)
Ibn hajar in Fath Al-Bari (60/1) when explaining the eighth hadith in kitaabul imaan of Sahih Al Bukhari, he said "And as that, Abu Al-Qasim Al-Lallikaa'i in kitabus-sunnah, on the authority of Shaafi'i, and Ahmad ibn Hanbal and Ishaaq ibn Rahuwiyah and Abi 'Ubaiyd and other then them from the A'imah, being narrated with a authentic chain that Bukhari said: I met more than 1000 scholars from multiple countries, I did not see one from them differ in that Imaan is Qowl wa 'Aml, it increases and decreases.
Jazakumullahu Khayran.
Sheikh Tiktok can you tell me what you think about Saudis Bombing Yemen. Their Loyality to Israel and What your opinions are. Can you make a separate video and give my channel a shout out please. Thank you
so you gonna dismiss the ahadeeth and what the ulama have said
grow up
@@acbacbacbacbacb I want to know why during War times. That the Salafiyyah Saudi Boot lickers. NIGHT CLUB DIVAS are attacking Respected Da'ees online? Is it jealousy or is it they're not part of this Ummah at all? Who harms their brother knowingly. Continously. Only those on a payroll.
@@HalsSpeaksFacts my god. you're not going to escape. the day of judgment is inevitable and you're gonna see what awaiting you. accusing other Muslims of kufur who do you think you are? a respected scholar? you're a troll on the internet.
@@acbacbacbacbacb actually my names Halima. I'm very established in the Speakers Corner scene. I removed the Toxic people who insulted my Prophet ﷺ from the park. Whilst Shamsi & Co were hiding.
So I'm not literally making Takfeer. I'm not a Madkhali. Just asking what Muslim who has nothing to offer Muslims. Unable to defend Deen Ul Islam. KEEPS Discrediting Muslims who are on the Front line. REPPING. With the Blessings of Allah swt. Keep this hate going? I just don't get it
@@HalsSpeaksFacts i dont care if you're on speakers corner or in the mecca mosque. your ideas are dangerous for the ummah. it will literally divide the ummah.
maybe you're doing a good job outside the ummah(speakers corner). may Allah bless you for that but I'm talking about the damages and the finta you and your masters are doing.
now if you have any refutations to the sources that brother faris has presented then talk. if you don't have any refuations THEN STOP SPREADING FINTA IN MY COUNTRY AND THE COUNTRY OF THE MUSLIMS.
A good response. But you used the words "Muslim rulers" repeatedly and what you said applies to Muslim rulers. What do you mean by Muslim rulers? Is it rulers who are born Muslim or is it rulers who follows the shari'a to the T? Are they still Muslim rulers if they pledge allegiance to obvious enemies of the Ummah like Israelis? Are they still Muslim rulers if they support and encourage fitnah like Music festivals and Halloween, which originated as a festival of worshipping shaytan? I would like to know the scholars' opinion. And if you say they are not Muslim rulers, then how should we act? What is the stance of ahlus Sunnah Wal jama'a in this situation? Please understand this is a genuine question and not a troll.
I agree with you that Daniel is blowing this situation out of proportion (and thanks for the detailed description and hadiths regarding the words both sides were exchanging ). But at the same time, I can't help but wonder what your opinion is on the above matters.
Another thing which I am not looking for an answer but merely stating my (and a lot of others) emotions is that,
as the birthplace of Nabi Muhammad (PBUH) and Al Furqan, we believe that we have a spiritual bond to the holy lands of Arabia. That's why it hurts and angers us to see that the rulers of such holy lands are not complying with the shari'a completely
@@JakeBrancatellaClips Jazakallahu Khairan. But that means what was discussed in this video doesn't apply to these so called "Muslim rulers" right?
@@JakeBrancatellaClips I agree with you. But the rulers clearly committed some things that not only don't comply with the shari'a but completely oppose it. I believe there must be some criticism from the Ummah. And the response for that healthy criticism from the likes of brother Faris and others is too much. Again, I know what I believe is not important, but what the Ulamas agree upon is.
you are a khariji no matter how kuffri and satanic the ruller promote push people to go out of islam by all mean you should remain silent where actually madkhalis are liars dont beleive them their works tend to destroy islam in order to keep the ruller in his armchair with his gold cars and airplanes and his yukhot,and castle.
BUT WHERE are the scholars in UAE or other 😮Islamic countries that are talking about the issues?
Shaykh what if a person doesn’t live under the certain ruler and he lives in different country so how can those 2 levels of khurooj applicable for that individual when he is not leaving in that country.
When you said "like Salman el oda" you basically said it all and now i have so much respect for this daniel that i dont even know
Guess you like liberalism just like Salman Al Luda
@@supersayain48 Salman Al Awdah made takfir on the muslim rulers
@supersayain48 Bin Salman is the liberal not Sheikh Salman.
That's because you're just as shallow. You can relate to this Daniel who is a liar and a name caller. A keyboard warrior who does provocation. If you are emotional and unwise I believe you will find him charismatic.
@@saadwael492 awdah is too working with pauline ppl.
With all due respect, brother, your topic is absolutely irrelevant. I am not defending the person who you are referring to, but to some points that you are mentioning.
Your discussion is theoretical. There is no disagreement on the principle that it is not allowed to overthrow rulers. However, there are some points and questions here, which I personally would love to hear a scholar examine them in a very contemporary context.
A great majority of Muslims today live under non-Muslim governments. Saudi Araiba, for example, does not represent all Muslims, even though you're specifying that country, and definitely it is not the talk of the day. I am not a Saudi citizen and I have no obligation to obey that government at all. Find me one scholar that places a Saudi official or the king himself, as an example, in the position of a ruler for a person who is not a Saudi citizen?
One might argue that by merely defending the idea of criticizing a Saudi leader includes them into the category of khawarij.
Let's be here more practical and leave the theory aside. Why would one criticize the Saudi Government, such as myself? I am talking about Saudi Arabia as a typical example and based on my personal experience with that government.
There are a couple of reasons. If the Saudi Government cooperates openly with the governments of other countries against Muslims, or certain individuals, then those individuals are going to defend themselves. I have no idea why this Daniel criticizes the Muslim leaders, but if a Muslim leader and their spies cooperate with the western governments - and I am not going to mention details here, against Muslims who live in those countries, then there is no choice but to defend ourselves.
Unfortunately, the Saudi Government is that kind of government. It is a spy and backstabbing government which cooperate with others in order to deceive and backstab Muslims - citizens of other countries.
I am originally from the country of Albania, but let me tell you brother, if spies - citizens of Saudi Arabia, are used for the benefit of the western countries or the country of Albania, I am going to defend myself. In this regard, there are many Muslims in the same position.
Muslims are oppressed and infiltrated by spies in every family, and you are talking about rebellions against rulers. Rest assured, my brother, Muslims do not have the capacity to overthrow any government. This topic is irrelevant. I am not talking here about the branches of the CIA such as ISIS. Muslims do not have the capacity to overthrow governments.
The reason why Saudi Arabia or the governments of other Muslims countries arrest Muslims is not that they incite revolutions. It is a British and CIA agenda to possibly arrest all Muslims who could pose a threat to the British Empire, who are trying to practice Islam, who are trying to protect their families, who are trying to uphold Islam. Muslims are being arrested on orders from the CIA, not on orders from local governments.
You're absolutely off the topic. You're assuming as if there are independent Muslim governments, so the question is whether they should be overthrown or not. We live under the strict control of the British Empire.
And let me be clear again: I am against khawarij and those who incite violence or who encourage people to overthrow Muslims governments. Even politically speaking, that's not a successful way. I am against protests, political parties and all the western bullshit that has been invented by the British Empire. However, I cannot tolerate spies and the culture of spies.
Find me one independent Muslim king or ruler, I would be the first one to come and pledge allegiance to them, no matter how unjust they are. Just guarantee me that they are not appointed by the British Empire or the CIA.
To conclude, while I really believe that we live under the occupation of the British Empire, which makes your discussion irrelevant, the governments of Muslim countries should know very well that as long as they cooperate with the western governments against Muslims who live in the West, they are making a fatal mistake.
I've had a personal experience with the Government of Saudi Arabia. It is a backstabbing and a spy government, which cooperates with the governments such as the Albanian one against Muslims. Well, the Saudi King is not my king. To me, he is a Muslim among Muslims, and a citizen among citizens of the British Empire. If citizens of Saudi Arabia are used as CIA spies, those who live actually in Saudi Ariba, then that King has to be prepared to pay the price.
Personally, whenever I have the opportunity to campaign publicly for the removal of the embassy of Saudi Arabia from Albania in a legal way, I will do so. You mentioned that khawarij should be killed in order to stop a greater harm. By the same token, the spy embassies of Saudi Arabia should be removed, in this case, from Albania for a greater good.
My brother, when we Muslims in the West or in Albania deal with our governments, we are prepared to deal with our enemies. We know that our governments are after us, they are looking to arrest us only because we say "laa ilahe Il-llallah." What has surprised me is the position of Saudi Arabia to the extent that I cannot explain to you. It is a spy country controlled to the details by the CIA. It is an absolute shame.
It claims to uphold teuheed. May Allah reward them for that, but espionage and backstabbing are not the characteristic of people of teuheed.
I don't know in what world you live and what experience you have.
I I I …. Shut up bro our deen is not based upon emotions or opinions…all that and you said NOTHING…SubhaanAllaah
And don't speak about stuff you have no knowledge of.
You are speaking about plans, spies etc. Conspiracy stuff
Which of it you can actually factually proof?
Sorry that's impossible and I hope you recognise it.
As prophet said, the biggest lies are suspicious talk.
Imagine, you go to court, and you have to proof your claims. I hope you realise that nothing will support you in a court. I hope you know what kind of evidences count on court.
BBC, CNN, Facebook etc. Messages which source can not be verified etc. Will not count
@@badbritish2061 your response has no manners
@@ortspoon320 feelings feelings feelings..boo woo..not here to like folks..HAQ is HAQ…do read a book..
Same goes for indian muslims too brother
So at the end of the day, in order to not to be khawarij, i shouldnt talk about any politician even if they act completely against islam but they idnetify themselves as "muslim".
Feels kinda unjust, but If it is right then yes
Basically yes. It's *MAD* khalism for you.
8:21 what is the certain way?plz make another video especially about this topic,
I like DH.
Shaykh Fawzan (and many others before him) calls the person who judges with something other than what Allah ﷻ has sent down a taghut!
True
True, but who is judging so?
@@user-be2tw4xg7x yo superheroes from saudi n uae, who else?
The Sahabas publicly refuted rulers as evidenced by Daniel so how is that a bid'ah?
In Islam, haram to refute Muslim rulers. Basic information, and it is the roots
Who Are You to call Shaykh Selman al Ouda or Shaykh Suleyman Ulwan khwaradish.??
MashAllah sheikh. If khurooj is not allowed in islam why did Hussain (a.s) did it against yazid?
Why did medina revolted against yazid? And why did Al Saud revolt against Ottomans?
From what I understand daniel just pointed out the biddah that Muhammad bin Salman started in hijaz. Allowing concerts on holy land and doing haloween there, and you expect ummah to be silent?
Shaykh 'Abdur-Rahman as-Sa'di (teacher of ibn 'Uthaymīn) said in his tafsir:
﴿يُرِيدُونَ أَنْ يَتَحَاكَمُوا إِلَى الطَّاغُوتِ﴾ وهو كل من حكم بغير شرع الله فهو طاغوت.
regarding the words of Allah ta'ala: "they wish to seek judgment from the taaghoot" as-Sa'di says: "and it is everyone who rules by other than the law of Allah, he is a taaghoot"
brother Faris can you explain to me through Quran and Saheeh hadeeth how its okay for your rulers these kings and prince to have so many wives when Quran allows up to 4? Also how come they are bffs with the same US government that has been invading muslim countries? I just wanna know mainly how do they use islam to justiy having so many wives? Also are you saying we shouldn't be saying anything against the muslim rulers just because? what if they are hurting your country or doing something against Islam?
One bad example is my country Libya 🇱🇾, it was a prosperous wealthy nation, easy life and stuff, look at Libya now! It’s a mess, all due to khwarij and the western propaganda that had spread in 2011.
@@at_1804 I do respect all salafi scholars, they never said you must rebel against gaddafi, with all due respect, I used to live in libya and I’m Libyan too, so please don’t comment and say things that you would never know since you aren’t Libyan, take care of your family and don’t get involved in stuff you never have a clue about!
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله
Can you please add ibn taymiyyah statement in arabic please.
I can't find it
You didnt give the full definition of taghut
The term is also applied to earthly tyrannical power, as implied in surah An-Nisa verse 60
not tyrannical power but (1) to refer legislation to false objects of worship or those transgressors who usurp the divine right of government.
Have you not seen those who claim to have believed in what was revealed to you [O Muḥammad] and what was revealed before you? They wish to refer legislation to ṭāghūt(1), while they were commanded to reject it, and Satan wishes to lead them far astray. (the Quran 4•60)
this ayah is talking about the munafiqs and we cannot know who the munafiqs are by name! so we must look for major kufr actions or speech of the individual. minor kufr is not enough to make takfeer! go learn the difference from the major sunni scholars.
@@muslimresponse103 Ibn Uthaymeen takfired those Don't rule by sharia
@@criticalmystic Proof ?
@@TheMedicalLad ruclips.net/video/CeJdpKwe1l0/видео.html
@@criticalmystic there is literally audio footage avaliable on RUclips of him going into detail with this topic, you likely just read some general statement he made which takfiris share around. In the audio, he explicitly said that the one who doesnt rule by what Allah revealed, but believes in his heart its the truth and better than anything, them he hasnt disbelieved.
BarakAllahu feek...You have such a good heart. may Allah keep you close to Himself always. I hope our brother Daniel benefits from this video in-sha-allah.
i hope You and this madkhali monk benefit from brother Daniel's latest exposure of these kind of boot licking monks .
Jazakallahu khair for this clarification akhi. Just one question, since the arab rulers are not the rulers of Daniel, couldn't he say that this allows his criticism to be permissible?
He cannot incite Muslims to rebel by publicizing mistakes of rulers
I would recommend books of Salaf like
Usool u Sunnah by Imam Ahmad
Aqeedatul Wastiyyah by Ibn Taymiyyah
Kitab u Tawheed by Muhammad At Tamimi
Plz study those to learn more about aqeedah and manhaj of ahlu sunnah
@@TawheedPromoter jazakallahu khair
@The Based Arab and Salafi Yes.
@@TawheedPromoter what do you mean publicizing his mistakes?
The rulers are actively and openly liberalizing and secularizing Muslims in their own land
How is this okay? And we must all stand by and not even criticize because it’s better to let idols enter our homes than be falsely labeled a khawarij?
@@TawheedPromoter ahmad ibn hanbal ain't no salaf. 🤣
It is similar to celebrating Diwali, Durga Puja and the rest of the Hindu festival. Just because some form of shirki acts has been modernised and to celebrate them has become trendy, does not make it any less shirk. Shirk is shirk regardless of where it’s been done or who is doing. If we as Muslims don’t feel anything when we see shirk entering our holiest land, then we need to check our Imaan.
Narrated Anas:
Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "Help your brother, whether he is an oppressor or he is an oppressed one. People asked, "O Allah's Messenger (ﷺ)! It is all right to help him if he is oppressed, but how should we help him if he is an oppressor?" The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "By preventing him from oppressing others."
Sahih al-Bukhari 2444
Brother Faris... How can we apply this to rulers if he is an oppressor
@@thanveermohammed1997 Salafi.exe has stopped working
Alhamdulilah I found people who are balanced in the sunnah and their dawah. Daniel's work and dawah against liberalism, feminism and atheism is commendable and fantastic and is very beneficial to the Muslim ummah in giving Izzah to Islam and the Muslims against these forceful ideologies but that's all it is. Everybody has their specialities and strengths in dawah however, when somebody in the scene neglects to even mention anything about aqeedah, or manhaj I automatically be aware of this person. People of the sunnah are upon clarity and do not shy away from clarifying their positions. May Allah guide him.
this celebrity you are following his specialty was is a gym coatch, as long as his beard became white he wear djellaba and became a sheikh and he is giving people fatwa and classify them as khawarij the dogs of the heel fire .
10:32 described it all.
If you see a wrong doings non of your business.😳
@@whatthe.4703 we are suppose to enjoin in good and forbid evil. You will be questioned by Allah if you kept silent about The Truth and “minded your own business.” This man is leading masses of his followers to jahannam.
@@SuperDuperColossal i totally agree brother
Daniel is a red pill dog 😂
Assalamualaikum. Please provide sources and reference when you make claims
I hope this generation has the attention span to watch and understand this. They are so heist in judging without anyyy knowledge. May Allah grant us sound knowledge, help us hold firmly to the Quran and Sunnah. Ameen
The difference between you and Daniel.
Daniel attacks enemies of Islam.
You and the madkhali sect keep attacking Muslims and keep labelling them with names they are innocent of as if they have nothing else to do in their life.
Where in the religion of Allah criticizing things some rulers do which may opposite religion give you the right to label them Khawarij?
Daniel don't care about your rulers he lives in the west they are not his rulers.
Where is your proof of accusation that the people you talked about called for the violence you describe?
See we live in the west we are educated people with critical thinking with access to academic research and information. We have a clear picture about what is going on in the Arabic and Islamic world. We are not brainwashed as you are so please don't take us for easy sheep to manipulate.
Lol westerners are educated people with critical thinking. NOT!
3:55 The Saudi Government put the Ex-Imam of Al-Haram into prison for criticizing music festivals!
Subhanallah, yani this isn't justified!
He made a vid on that check it out type faris hammadi Khaled Al Rashid
@@chewycookies131 link
hearing and obeying is for the muslim ruler. not for the secular arab rulers who do not rule by shariah and are allying with the kuffar against muslims
Sheikh Daneil is on the Haqq, he is speaking the truth and standing for rights of islam and muslims, all true muslims ahlul sunnah (wal hadith wal athar) stand with him, what you are saying is pure devaincy and falsehood; thus rendering you a mubtadi and deviant.
The current systems in muslim lands are liberalism & remnants of colonialism so the rulings of kharijites cannot be applied to those who are seeking revival and working hard to bring about an islamic order. Once there arises a real islamic rule and then those rulers in it commit some injustices etc then those rules which some - salafi/madkhlai deviants spew out- that is when those rules of rebellion/kharijites are applied e.g, when sheikh hafiz mursi (rahimahuAllah) became president he was the waliul amr, those who rebelled against him ie the fasiq liberal (sisi) & those who stood with him are the kharijites kilab ahlil naar.
We are too quick to equate verbal criticism to action of rebellion. There are words. And there are actions.
Did you pay attention to what he said about the 3 levels of Khuruj?
Can you please make a video on how to deal with such a ruler.
Does he know Daniel Arabic? 😊lol
By being patient and prying for them to allah to guide them to right path and advise them privately if that possible.
@ahmedalfalasi5418 if not possible? They should leave the position to those who work for helping muslims and uniting them .
So you want to destroy uae and Saudi governments for what to make chaos like what happened in Libya if Saudi government falls do you know what will happen to all Muslim in world
So Salman al-Odahs blood is halal i.e. he can be killed?
This arabic clothes don’t give you the right to say something like that ya sheikh!
...Salmaan Audah did not get put into Prison except that he asked for unity amongst UAE & Qatar (in a tweet). What is wrong with that?🤷🏿♀️
Jazakallah for the clarification video ustadh
I am really confused... I feel Daniel is correctly pointing out the wrongs which are indeed wrongs happening in KSA. But then shaykh tiktoks and Br.Saajids arguement backed by ahadith also make sense. Dont know which side to choose...
Look at the actions of the governments. Killing people who speak up (Khasoghi). Building relationships with Israel, Whats happening in Saudi Arabia with their LGBT. Best we can do is recognise the wrong and rectify ourselves. There is so much confusion in the world. Whats happened in Syria can't be repeated everywhere else.
Choose the one who is backed by ahadith obviously
Brother we are obligated to follow the Quran and Ahadeeth as understood by the Sahabah. These brothers are advising Daniel H with sincere advice with evidence.
I agree I understand Saajid and this shaykh point but they also say leave it to the scholars, Imam, ministers that’s where the issue lies down these people are not saying anything and are letting the country become more and more westernised not caring the harm it’s going to cause not only the country but the Muslim Ummah from that point I can understand why Daniel does what he does
This shaykh even said weigh the good and bad there is no good coming from letting it happen only bad
Choose Daniel this devils cherry pick ahadith to suit there agenda.
Asalamualykum. I have a question from the video, can you please give a real world example of at-Taghuut? I don't want a generic outline, like "workshopped other than Allah", I ask you to give a real world example.
Jazak Allahu Khairan.
Firaun was a taghoot, he asked people to worship him and he was happy with it
May Allah establish khilafah in current day Middle Eastern countries. Ameen!
Ameen
When you addressed the page and the volume of the book, that was enough for me😂😂😂
ma shaa’ Allah, barak Allahu fiykum !
7:10
The word Tagut means an oppressive ruler. If you opened a dictionary you would've known that:
مقتبس من المعجم الوسيط:
تعريف و معنى طاغوت في قاموس الغني. قاموس عربي عربي
طَاغُوتٌ (المعجم الغني)
جمع: طَوَاغِيتُ. [ط غ و].
1. :-حَاكِمٌ طَاغُوتٌ :-: طَاغٍ، مُتَجَبِّرٌ، ظَالِمٌ.
2. :-اِحْتَرِسْ مِنَ الطَّاغُوتِ :- : مِنَ الشَّيْطَانِ.النحل آية 36 اُعْبُدُوا اللَّهَ وَاجْتَنِبُوا الطَّاغُوتَ (قرآن)
Jazakallahkhairan brother, from the UK
MaashaaAllah well explained
Video quality Better then Hollywood 😆 Allahumma Barik! absolute mint.
Saudi funds
@@user-we5ry4hz2w daleel? Or are you a filthy kadhab?
@@l1on923 video quality
@@user-we5ry4hz2w gather evidence which Allah will ask you (for your slander)
@@Muwahid999 this is why we are weak . We are fighting each other while the west is getting stronger
What’s the Hukm for who tweeted this before the coup in Egypt and the biggest genocide done in modern Egyptian history?
“The president Morsi is a legitimate guardian, but it is only hidden from a fool that the Brotherhood was the one who was ruling”
“The world would be a better place without the muslim brotherhood”
Faris Al-Hamdi
The MB are like Firaun and Sisi is like Prophet Musa, he saved Egypt and brought glory to it
I have been following these brothers from long time and have benefited alhamdulillah. Now seeing each of them accusing eachother and getting divided makes me sick, what I'll suggest is that all the brothers should talk in private and solve whatever issues they have, at the end we are weak and we can make mistakes. May Allah unite muslims and guide us on straight path.
Everything political....I agree with wholeheartedly as we continually recover to do better but Allah warns us about them and tells us to belief in ALLAH and we have direct access. All we need is Wudu.
I would recommend books of Salaf like
Usool u Sunnah by Imam Ahmad
Aqeedatul Wastiyyah by Ibn Taymiyyah
Kitab u Tawheed by Muhammad At Tamimi
Plz study those to learn more about aqeedah and manhaj of ahlu sunnah
Mistakes done openly is to be corrected openly....Advice the person in private and tell the public this is a mistake, Bida etc. If the person persists than name him, so people know what he is calling to
Shaitan works hard to divide the Muslims.
@@MuhammadAbdullah-kx3kn when we talk about the salaf, we mean the ulama, the scholars. There isn't a single record stating that the scholars encouraged or participated in the said rebellion.
May Allah guide Daniel and us all to the straight path, ameen
Ameen
آمين
To your sheikh Faris👇
You some Arab shiekhs are not sheikh for Islam but for the USA 🇺🇸 and NATO that is why is you are barking on those muslims like on Daniel so that they not aware muslim Ummah about you western slaves.
Stop being arrogant. Petro-dollar and stealing Muslims hajj money have made forgotten how much our muslim brothers and sisters suffer in Palestine, Yemen, KHURASAN, Sham, Irak and Lebanon.
You American sheikhs, stop Barking and being arrogant. All muslims around the world have the right to slap hard in your faces so that you wake and repent what have done to muslims by just being slaves of westerners and supporting wahabi terrorist idea in the muslim countries.
You Westerners shiekhs, you have not right to speak like this. Slap yourself stupid.
Amin but start du'as with making du'a for yourself like Nuh did in Surah Nuh last ayat and Suah Hashr too I believe.
@Jahmis are taughut lovers jealous Saudis revived Tawhid from Uthmanis...
Dear sheikh, Daniel asked that question from madhkalis in general who do call him a khariji, and by extension imply his blood is permissible,
Some have even called on the US government to arrest him for talking against Muslim governments
Granted, he doesnt acknowledge that the madhakilah have a spectrum of belief.
Scholars for dollars
Can I ask a question? Did the khawarij exist at the time of the prophet(saw)? If so, who were they? what does history say about them?
Yes actually they did.
There was a man called dhul quwaisira. When the Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم was distributing spoils, he did not get what he wanted so he told the messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم to be just, and it was said by the messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم about this man that the khawarij would come from him
Okay, so is Sheikh Al-Albani a khariji? Thanks for the respons
This rabbi said its haram to boycott israeli goods.
U even did not bother yourself to watch the video subhan Allah, he never said that. Go back to the source, May Allah guide u
@@parweenhabibi5585 what about you? Don't need to be guided?
This Hammadi guy is the same guy who publicly criticized president Erdugan and Morsi (may Allah have mercy on his soul). The hypocrisy is speaking volumes
Come on coach i need u to answer this Q! What's the penalty for hypocrites?
This is funny when some criticise muslim governments for not liberal enough they are not kwhariji..but if the are not Islamic enough they are.kwariji
He gets paid from KSA and UAE governments,what would you expect him to say ?
Brother, a question if you don't mind. Do these kharijji traits also apply to people who don't belong to the land and who have not made bay'ah to the foreign countries ruler? So for example in Daniels case, since he does not belong or live in the countries he is criticising, can he still be considered as acting like kharijis? Thanks, jazakalahu kheir.
The issue is criticizing the Muslim rulers which would bring no benefit to ummah. It is not related to whether he belongs that land or not. Unless, someone has any authority to change a rulers mistakes, Islam doesn't promote reviling that ruler which would bring no benefit to anybody.
@@chowdhurymohammadarif190 Yes, I understand that it brings no maslaha and is the doorway to encouraging rebellion in those countries and fitnah despite not belonging to those Muslim countries. But more specifically I was interested in knowing whether this would brand them as 'kharijis' or even 'khariji-adherent' despite not belonging to those countries or giving any bay'ah. Whilst it may seem like the end result should be the same (i.e. do not criticize Muslim rulers), the distinction between who should be branded a khariji is an important question, although I think it may be too complicated and requires a alim's input. Barakalahu feek
I have the same exact question. Hope the brother can address this counterpoint.
If rebelling against ruler is haram , inciting people to do it is also haram. Like drinking alcohol is haram and calling people to drink it is also haram
Yes because these are Muslim nations and Muslim rulers and we’re told unless blatant disbelief to not cause divisions, that includes riling up people from other nations against their leaders
Madkhali bootlickers are getting mad of Daniel
thats deviance what you are saying. the lady who objected to Caliph Umar RA’s was she doing Khurroj bil lissan???
Just a reminder that this former fitness instructor made a tweet back in 2013 encouraging the removal of the Muslim Brotherhood days before the coup in Egypt. 🤡
Daniel spoke the truth. I wonder why he is being attacked for it 🤔 💭. May Allah protect the Muslims.
Truth of what ???
@@mightyhadi6132 Wahdat not wahdaat ul woojood
@@Farrukhsiyar159
Daniel was spoke not based on three generations and the sahaba understanding of Hadith.
@@mightyhadi6132 Proof?
@@Farrukhsiyar159
His own speech, he even miss translated a Hadith about advicing a ruler.
May Allaah preserve you ya ustad
Was Muhammad ibn abdul wahab kawarij he killed a lot of muslims and made takfir on the whole ummah except himself and his crew
Claiming consensus of the obedience to the ruler without restrictions is a blatant lie or ignorance. The slightest look in the history or the work of many scholars shows otherwise. Unrestricted obedience, without even having the ability to criticize publicly is the work of some of the gulf rulers and it has nothing to do with Islam.
obviously, Muslim rulers should be obeyed, as long as they obey Allah. If they disobey the creator and transgress, no one has to obey them and criticizing them publicly is allowed.
Brother Daniel Haqiqatjou stands up for what's right and calls out what is wrong. May Allah bless him for enjoining good and forbidding evil.
It is not nahiyal munkar that Daniel praises deobandis and mocks ulama as madkhalis and then promotes revolting against muslim rulers, have you not ever read anything from the salaf and the statements of the sahaba? Read!
@@user-be2tw4xg7x brother.. what are you talking about. you have no knowledge of the sunnah of the prophet. so stop lying.
brother daniel has partial support to the deobandis since the deobandis the pro-khilafa, whereas arab ulama are just supporting the arab rulers most of whom are despots.
@@user-be2tw4xg7x deobandis are far best compared to salfi hypocrites. These salfis call themselves followers of Quran and sunnah and yet promote clubs wines beaches in the holy country. Prophet pbuh said if you see something bad change it by your hands if u don't posses the power do it with your tongue if u are not able to do that, the least a muslim can do is to consider it bad in their heart
@@user-be2tw4xg7x but you Saudi bootlickers
@@user-be2tw4xg7x He obviously doesn't care.
Salam alaikom. You said that the taghut is something that accepts to be worshiped instead of Allah. This definition is not correct. It is also someone who is obeyed except Allah and he accepts it. For example the heads of ahlul bidaah and the ministers who accept bribes are also taghut but Muslims, not kafir. That is from kitab at tawheed.
جزاك الله خير يا فارس.
May Allah reward you Faris
So are you going to talk about Halloween in Saudi or not? I'm confused Shaikh.
Barakallah Feek Akhi, The Khawarj قعدية and Khawarj in general love to spew hate and animosity within people’s heart, yet if they had the chance to rule a country they would love for it’s people to follow the Salaf methodology in obeying them. Deep down they know they wouldn’t like to be criticized neither they like people’s to cause animosity against them. If you want to give advice to a ruler take him by the hand and do it. And Allah will reward you for that. Not Openly criticize him on the streets and everywhere, Just as YOU wouldn’t like it. He also wouldn’t like it. And the purpose of the Naseeha will render null, as you’ve caused more harm than good.
Shaykh al-Albaani:
"The person who is seeking the truth, one evidence will be enough for him. A person who is upon their desires, a thousand evidences will still not be clear for him."
[سلسلة الهدى و النور ٣١١]
Ibn Hajr (d.852H) said, "The Khawaarij of al Qa'diyyah(Sitters) did not hold the view of waging war. Rather, they opposed the rulers in accordance to their strength, they called to their opinion and along with that they beautified revolt and held it to be good."
Refer to at-Tahdheeb ( 8/114 ).
‘Iyad ibn Ghanam reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Whoever intends to advise one with authority on a matter, he should not do so publicly. Rather, he should take him by the hand and advise him in private. If he accepts the advice, all is well. If he does not accept it, he has fulfilled his duty.”
Source: Musnad Aḥmad 14909
Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Albani
Ibn Ḥajr mentioned, that sincere advice to the rulers includes, “reminding those [people whose] hearts have an aversion [to the rulers].”
Fatḥ al-Bāri vol. 1 p. 138
[His] intent by this is: to admonish people whose hearts have an aversion to the rulers [to the extent] that they are removing themselves from the main body of the Muslims (Jamaʿah) through questioning their authority amongst the citizens; and to remind them of the obligation to accept [their authority] and remain within their obedience; and to remind them of the Islamic proofs which obligate upon them patience towards [those rulers whose actions] have caused this aversion. The intent is not to return [people’s] hearts to their rulers through excessive praise.
Al-Hasan narrated saying: Allah’s Messenger mentioned the rulers and the evil rulers, the leaders and the evil leaders. He mentioned that the misguidance and deviation of some of them will fill what is between the sky and the earth! So he was asked: “O Messenger of Allah, should we not strike them with the sword??” He replied: “No. So long as they the pray the prayer, then no.” (Reported by Al-Imām Nu’aym Ibn Hammād (died 239H) in Kitāb Al-Fitan, 1/185, no. 491)
Ibn Abī ‘Āsim reported in As-Sunnah (1026) and Ibn Hibbān in his Sahīh (4062) from ‘Ubādah Ibn Sāmit (may Allah be pleased with him) that Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) said:
“Listen to the ruler and obey him when it is hard for you and when it is easy for you, whether you are pleased or displeased, and when others are given preference over you, and even when they consume your wealth and beat your back.” (Delared sahīh by Al-Albāni; see Dhilāl Al-Jannah and At-Ta’līqāt Al-Hisān).
It has been narrated on the authority of 'Abd al-Rahman b. Abd Rabb al-Ka'ba who said: ‘‘... He who swears allegiance to a Caliph should give him the pledge of his hand and the sincerity of his heart (i.e. submit to him both outwardly as well as inwardly). He should obey him to the best of his capacity. If another man comes forward, disputing his authority, they (the Muslims) should behead the latter. ...’’
Sahih Muslim 1844a
Tamim al-Dari reported: The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “The religion is sincere good will.” We said, “To whom?” The Prophet said, “To Allah, His Book, His Messenger, the leaders of the Muslims, and their common people.”
Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 55
Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Muslim
Ahmad Ibn Hanbal (d. 241H) stated in his work, Usūlus-Sunnah as is recorded in Sharhu Usūlil-I’tiqād of Al-Lālikā’ee (1/161):
“It is not permissible for anyone among the people to fight the ruler and nor to rise up against him. And whosoever does that is an innovator, upon other than the Sunnah and upon other than the Straight Path.”
Isn’t brother Faris Al Hammadi doing the same, meaning responding to Daniel in public rather than in private?
@@AdrianMuslim brother, may Allah make guidance easy for you. A ruler must be advised in private as the hadith mentions someone of authority. This is because Shariah does not allow changing evil if it will cause bigger problems. Advising ruler in public, if it was allowed everyday he will be advised by someone. It will be as if he is not fit to rule. This is bad and will lead to worse consequences. As for callers to islam, scholars or innovators, they also maybe advised privately but they have to correct their mistakes for the public themselves. If they do not cooperate with the one advising, he may clear/refute his mistake/innovation in public, if not, people's religion will become corrupted. In this is rectification.
I see why they call this guy the tiktok shiekh
جزاك الله خيرا على ردك الجميل
Brother Daniel is more than qualified to talk about this issue, because he is educated enough. If all great scholars are sent to prison, who's left to talk about these things. We're one Ummah therefore he has the full right to talk about the Arab tyrants.
Qualified how? Where did he study? Under whom? Where's his ijazah?
Brother, my first time to hear you and I subscribed right away. You clearly helped us all. و الله على كل شيء قدير
He clearly helped to bamboozle people. Sister seek knowledge rather than being fed it by these people, you will uncover the truth
@@user-kt4ze2ql7t and Daniel is the one to follow? If you consume his content with a clear mind, you'll know he's worse than thd ones he accusing.
You still do??
Can you please collaborate with Daniel and have a conversation with him?
This is the first time I'm learning about sunnah Wal jamaah and the Hadith that was mentioned but there is something I'm confused about. There is an Hadith that says (not quoting) it is of a believer that when his brother is in pain he feels his pain, then why would you say if there is some injustice going on in an Arab country another Muslim who isn't in such country can't make a comment or call others attention to such injustice that might be happening to our brothers and sisters, isn't that going against that Hadith?
Subhana Rabbi al A'laa. Those who claim authority over you, and those who yield to it are moving you towards disbelief as they invite the kufr to dance and expose themselves in your countries, to allow non married couples to book hotel rooms together, who would celebrate haloween and devilish acts, who call kufr enemies friends and brothers in iman enemies. Who would have you ambandon belief for disbelief progressively. Is it that you chase the life of this world forsaking the life of the hereafter?
how are you going to change it and make it better? like your khawarij friends did in Syria and many other places!
@@benzc5413 salaam my brother, they won't step aside they need to be removed. Blood can be shed if there is corruption in the land
JazakAllahu khairan brother Faris
Believe it or not I was pro-Daniel once. Until he think tolerating wahdatul wujud, taaweedz, and, Maturidi aqeedah. Something that unfound in Quran and Sunnah.
Just like it's not his job to speak about these issues, so isnt your's. whats the difference, are you a scolar ?
Madkhalis of secular Liberal Arab leaders are coming out against DH 😂....
Let’s not forget how some of the Arab nations normalised ties with Israel who persecute Palestinians
What about muslim rulers promoting shirk and music and dance on the land of tauheed ?
Its wrong. Are you expecting us to say its halal?
@@aq4356 if it's wrong then why don't criticize as we are told to do by Allah
كنتم خير أمة أخرجت للناس تأمرون بالمعروف و تنهون عن المنكر.
Every muslim knows this
@@blackzerox2Ai you critisce the evil by directly attacking the evil. We constantly critisce the evil that takes place in every Muslim country. The purpose of it all is to defend the Muslims from falling into evil/haram. The same cannot be said when people have speeches in public talking about the mistakes of the rulers, which the purpose itself is to make the lay people hate the rulers, which inevitably leads to disobedience, revolts etc.
Allah will judge them not u my brother
@@parweenhabibi5585 of course Allah will judge them and we aren't judging but we are doing what Allah told us
not criticizing the rulers when they clearly advocating for shirk festivals and allowing alcohol and everything that is haram??
Rather we do as Abu Bakr said: "Obey me as long as I obey Allah and His Messenger. And if I disobey Allah and His Messenger, then I have no right to your obedience."
If a person says those who don't rule by sharia is a kafir,is he a khariji?
Depends if the person who you are asking, if he is Madkhali, then ofc the answer is yes.
@@bryx99 i want an answer from this sheikh
As he claims he is a salafi
A man asked Ibn Abbas, may Allah be pleased with him, about this verse, “Whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed, they are the unbelievers,” (5.44). The man said, “Has one who does this committed unbelief?” Ibn Abbas said, “It is a type of unbelief if he does that, but it is not like one who disbelieves in Allah, the Last Day, and so on.”
Source: Tafsīr al-Ṭabarī 5:44
Shk. Bin Bazz and Co said this.
Read for example the article
The Tears Of Ibn Bāz: When Ibn Jibreen and Salmaan al-Awdah Debated Ibn Bāz
Go to tafaseer 5:44 السمعاني، he is saying, the khawarij use this verse for they saying
"Who leaves the hukm of Allah is kafir"
And he says, and what is found on every tafaseer who I know of, that Ahlu sunnah have tafseel there.
Meaning different cases and the judgment of such person differs.
Also, who drinks by left hand, did not judge by what Allah has revealed, he is kafir now?
Exactly this is the problem why khawarij make takfir on people on things which are not kufr Akbar.
And I give you a question.
Can a kafir be an imam of Muslims? Meaning leader?
Can be someone be an imam/leader of the Muslims if he don't judge by what Allah has revealed?
بارك الله فيك