Vineeta Sharma v/s Rakesh Sharma | Daughter becomes coparcener | Section 6 Hindu succession Act

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 дек 2024

Комментарии • 54

  • @studyiqjudiciary
    @studyiqjudiciary  4 месяца назад +1

    🏆Ace Your Judiciary Journey with our Unique Eklavya Batch
    Batch Link - www.studyiq.com/course-detail/eklavya-judiciary-live-foundation-batch
    ● Clear Prelims of any State Judiciary and get 50% fee refund
    ● Clear any State Judiciary and get 150% fee refund
    ● Success Assurance with 1 yr extra validity
    Enroll now in MONSOON Dhamaka sale and get the batch in just 27,999 by using your Favorite Educators Code
    Hurry up! Admissions closing on 31st July
    For any queries please call us on - 080-49801290

  • @kandukurisrinivas2202
    @kandukurisrinivas2202 11 месяцев назад +3

    Beautiful explanation. Hearty congratulations.

  • @sadhanasurendraborse507
    @sadhanasurendraborse507 Месяц назад

    Very nice expression.Thank you.

  • @ANITA258.
    @ANITA258. Год назад +5

    Good explanation sir🙏 maza aa gaya...

  • @madhumithar7066
    @madhumithar7066 8 месяцев назад +2

    No one can explain this case better sir thank you ❤

  • @kanjkumar6934
    @kanjkumar6934 9 месяцев назад +1

    Thanku

  • @kingqueen3084
    @kingqueen3084 9 месяцев назад +1

    Very nice lecture sir 🌹🌹🌹

  • @shivg1857
    @shivg1857 27 дней назад

    Important topic better analysis

  • @basavarajmathad658
    @basavarajmathad658 6 месяцев назад

    Very nicely explained 👌

  • @shaqeelquraishi2407
    @shaqeelquraishi2407 Год назад +1

    Yes sir

  • @ZeeshanKhan-pb5mc
    @ZeeshanKhan-pb5mc Год назад +1

    sir, i kindly urge you to make a video on uttam v saubhag case, where the SC decision and its observations regarding the notional partition has been severely criticised on the ground that they held that notional partition is actual partition and after that the interest of other coparcenars is separate and no further partition can be demanded over that separate property acquired through notional partition( though fictional in nature) and the interpratation of section 6 and section 8 of HSA 1956 has been wrongly given

  • @samadarshikar9408
    @samadarshikar9408 2 месяца назад

    Agar koi daughter ka birth 1920 mein hua hoa aur death 1997 mein hua hoa. Toa unke bete 2005 k baad property claim kar sakte hain kya? Mother's ancestral peoperty?

  • @dileepsingh3718
    @dileepsingh3718 Год назад +2

    waah sir mza aa gya....thank you
    kya ye 2005 k bad daughter ka right father ki self aquired and ancestral dono property pr hoga?

    • @vasudevmonga8098
      @vasudevmonga8098 Год назад

      Neither son nor daughter have right in separate property.

  • @rakeshkanrar8219
    @rakeshkanrar8219 Год назад

    All doubts are cleared 💝💝 thank u sir

  • @choudhary3334
    @choudhary3334 Год назад +3

    This is ideal situation when family has one boy and one girl
    What if family has one boy and two girls,??
    Court should give fix time frame like 10 years to take girls his Paternship. From father family.
    Otherwise brother family will always be in fear of loosing his father's home in all life time.

  • @ajeetpratapsingh8443
    @ajeetpratapsingh8443 Год назад

    उत्तर प्रदेश में इस सम्बंध में उत्तर प्रदेश राजस्व सहिंता 2005 प्रभावी है।

  • @sanjaynagarkatti9230
    @sanjaynagarkatti9230 9 месяцев назад

    Is this for ancestral as well self acquired property pl explain regards

  • @kajalrani3765
    @kajalrani3765 Год назад

    Great sir

  • @Motivate1322
    @Motivate1322 Год назад

    Thank u sir very well explanation 👍

  • @arbindkrgupta7754
    @arbindkrgupta7754 Год назад

    Is this judgement applicable in Dayabhaga law?

  • @studyiqjudiciary
    @studyiqjudiciary  Год назад +3

    For all Judicial Services Exams visit here
    bit.ly/JudiciarybyStudyIQ
    Judiciary (Pre + Mains)
    bit.ly/JudiciaryPreMains
    StudyIQ Judicial Services Course covers
    -Videos of all the Major and Minor laws, Local Laws
    - Weekly Live Doubt cum Mentorship Sessions
    -Current Affairs Videos by Dr. Gaurav Garg,
    -Judgement Writing Classes, Essay Writing and Answer Writing Classes and many more Sessions
    -Test Series for Prelims
    -Subject wise PYQ Paper Sets for all State Judicial Services.
    Judicial Service Examinations of 15 States Covered- Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Haryana, Punjab, Delhi, Gujarat, Rajasthan, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir, Uttarakhand, West Bengal, Orissa, Jharkhand , Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh
    For all Judicial Services Exams visit here
    bit.ly/JudiciarybyStudyIQ
    Download the App to Subscribe to the Course
    bit.ly/StudyIQAPP
    For any doubt, Call 95-8004-8004

    Click here for Whatsapp Chat
    wa.me/919554443351

  • @SameerD-u1q
    @SameerD-u1q 5 месяцев назад

    Sir my father has obtained allotment letter in 1997 under section 85 before tehsildar can it be reopened?

  • @shagunsharma2109
    @shagunsharma2109 Год назад

    Very well explained sir

  • @SurinderSingh-bp2nf
    @SurinderSingh-bp2nf 10 месяцев назад

    Sir, copercanery rights apply to girls not before the Hindu succession Act of 1956? Am I right please tell because amendment of 2005 talks about Hindu succession act which came in 1956

    • @samadarshikar9408
      @samadarshikar9408 2 месяца назад

      I think pre act ie before 1956 by birth will not be applicable. Because at that time succesor act will be applicable.

  • @pavip3099
    @pavip3099 Год назад

    Daughter's right since birth, does it mean 7 month's life in mother's womb?( in vivo)?

  • @serenesrn3827
    @serenesrn3827 Год назад

    What about mothers ancestral property ?

  • @SarojBachuwar
    @SarojBachuwar 3 месяца назад

    In a case, the property is HUF, and the father has executed an unregistered will in favor of the son, what will be the right of the daughters?

    • @vijayganeshan
      @vijayganeshan 3 месяца назад

      Daughters are made coparceners, it is straight forward now, daughters are given equal rights in the share and, therefore can file civil partition suit to claim the share.

  • @BAPPASHARMA-p9f
    @BAPPASHARMA-p9f 2 месяца назад

    2 nd wife & her son rights to property?

  • @kishorrane1835
    @kishorrane1835 Год назад +1

    Daughter ko do jagah pe right kaise ? Ye unlawful hai ! Agar Uska right uske husband ke property me hai to use sath me usko father ke property me bhi right milta hai to yeh unlawful hai

    • @desideveloper-in
      @desideveloper-in Год назад +1

      Wife ke property me bhi husband ka hissa hota he na.
      So don't think it is unlawful.

    • @Abhishek-ox3qk
      @Abhishek-ox3qk 4 месяца назад

      Kaise unlawful hua gadhe ?
      Jab beta lega toh beti ko bhi fayda kyu nhi

  • @Gk-ry8rg
    @Gk-ry8rg Год назад

    Beti ka haq hona cahiye bap koi property par lekin husband ke property par wife ka kuch nhi hona chaiye na hi almony

  • @vinaypandey4964
    @vinaypandey4964 Год назад

    If there is only one son and one or more daughter what will happen if father is died 2002 .in that situation. Daughter will remain have right over property

    • @devidasmarutigajewar5884
      @devidasmarutigajewar5884 Год назад +1

      9-9-2005 father live or death, before or after do claim.
      20-12-2004. Property not partitioned then u can claim

  • @mayursharma3913
    @mayursharma3913 19 дней назад

    Zabardasti ka law... Wrong Judgement forced on public of this country.

  • @technologybyArvind
    @technologybyArvind Год назад +14

    Daughter ko bilkul partnership nahi milna chahiye. I am boycott that law.

    • @akshittaneja4260
      @akshittaneja4260 Год назад

      😂

    • @technologybyArvind
      @technologybyArvind Год назад +1

      Bhai Aaj ki bahane enta chalak hai ki agar kisi Bhai ke thoda Kam budhi toh uska hissa bhee halap Rahi hai.

    • @AKANKSHASINGH-wu3AS
      @AKANKSHASINGH-wu3AS Год назад

      Kyu

    • @serenesrn3827
      @serenesrn3827 Год назад +5

      You can do what you want with money you earned .Ancestral property is equally divided among siblings .

    • @rupatiwari5689
      @rupatiwari5689 8 месяцев назад

      ​@@technologybyArvindmere pita n meri pdhai ka shadi ka personal koi kharcha nhi uthaya.. Vo bolte te mujhe ladki m invest krke koi profit nhi h or domestic violence bhi krte te Mera hath pair facture h... Bhai sahab mujhe pita s property m hissa Lena Chahiye ya nhi plz btaiye.

  • @Dis8390
    @Dis8390 Год назад +2

    Coparcenary right nahi milane chahiye daughters ko

  • @realityshorts7494
    @realityshorts7494 Год назад

    Ye bataiye agar daughter and her husband are having lots of properties more than her brothers..
    There annual income is 7-8 lakh then , can a daughter claim the property..
    As it is unfair according to me

    • @urfavgamer9414
      @urfavgamer9414 10 месяцев назад +2

      Yes, of course, no matter how rich he is, he has his rights.

  • @jitendrasinghkaurav5421
    @jitendrasinghkaurav5421 Год назад +1

    Yeh pic kis baap beti ka daal diya aapne, did they authorise you to use this pic or u hv used some random pic, but u to ans atleast.