Tour of El Gordo Galaxy Cluster
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 авг 2023
- In July 2022, NASA's James Webb Space Telescope observed El Gordo, a galaxy cluster that existed 6.2 billion years after the big bang. It was selected as the most massive galaxy cluster known at that time in cosmic history. The resulting image reveals a variety of gravitationally lensed galaxies, including striking objects nicknamed the Fishhook and the Thin One. Come with us on a video tour of this new infrared image from Webb.
Credits
Image:
NASA, ESA, CSA
Science:
Jose M. Diego (IFCA), Brenda Frye (University of Arizona), Patrick Kamieneski (ASU), Tim Carleton (ASU), Rogier Windhorst (ASU)
Image Processing:
Alyssa Pagan (STScI), Jake Summers (ASU), Jordan C. J. D'Silva (UWA), Anton M. Koekemoer (STScI), Aaron Robotham (UWA), Rogier Windhorst (ASU)
Video:
Danielle Kirshenblat (STScI) 
Наука
It is undeniably overwhelming! The enormity of the time spans and vast distances that lie before us surpasses our mental grasp.
I extend my heartfelt gratitude to all who have contributed to making this incredible experience possible for me. Thanks to you, I now have the opportunity to see, learn, and experience things that were once mere dreams during the last 60 years.
Confronted with such vastness, the magical worldviews held by certain ancient desert cultures, to which many still tenaciously adhere today, appear limited and ignorant when contrasted with the undeniable realities of our existence.
Do you need something greater than yourself? Well, here it is-truly overwhelming and undeniably real.
Like they say .. A good picture is worth 1000 PhDs.
Stunning! Sublime! Powerful! Other adjectives indicating extreme incredulity as needed!
Keep 'em coming. As old and beat as these old eyes get, they're still thirsty to see as deeply as they can.
incredible. gobsmacked. blown away. i cant believe i get to be alive while this is happening. go webb team go!
Awesome
Thank you James 😉
So cool
amazing video. I'm your fan ＋👍🔔
I love how Hubble and JWST compliment each other, not replacing anyone.
These are awe inspiring to look at, but also terrifying. I don't think the corperate training video music quite does these images justice.
Amazing!
Excellent work 👍
Thanks James
Imagine the alien civilization existing out there. And they must be observing us.
❤
Beautiful image. I have to chuckle though when I hear people say things like "...when the universe was 6.2 billion years old". That's the same spirit of belief from long ago that was certain that if you sailed too far into the ocean you'd fall off the edge.
Exactly my thoughts. It is very bold to think we humans have cracked the universes existence.
Yeah me too, like "how did you count?"
I only wish the pioneers of Astronomy, the Keplers, the Galileos,...could come back and see this.
This is mind blowing!
Amazing
*AMAZING.*
Wow looking at these galaxies and thinking there’s definitely what we would consider intelligent life out there. It’s impossible that it doesn’t exist.
Ty james Webb
Dreams come true❤❤❤
Surely today we can use Galaxy Lensing with Software to reverse the distortion and view what is behind it! We understand the physics of the gravitational distortions due to lensing, so it shouldn't be too difficult to write code to reverse that on a computer then use it to view what is behind and extend the reach of our own telescopes.
The question still remain." Are We Alone"?
We are nothing.
Speak for yourself, Mr. Bleak Existentialist. 🙄
@@TheStockwell 🤡
you are but a grain of sand in the hour glass of time
but you are still a grain, stooge
@@TheStockwellwhat
We are everything we are a part of all of that
We are in the living embodiment of this universe we live on
The universe experiencing itself through our eyes
Beautiful pictures. I think it would be better to just show us the pictures instead of trying to explain the theories about them.
The universe ALWAYS existed in some form and NEVER had a beginning.
a. Modern science claims energy cannot be created nor destroyed, hence energy is eternally existent.
b. An absolute somethingness cannot come from an absolute nothingness, so an absolute somethingness always existed, most probably being energy itself.
c. Universe ALWAYS existed in some form and NEVER had a beginning, No Creator Needed.
'a' is true, is it not? 'b' is true, is it not? If 'a' and 'b' are true, then no creator is needed in 'c'.
* Some people for some reason (social conditioning/brainwashing/wishful thinking) believe in future eternity without end but do not accept eternity past with no beginning.
Give it a rest, Flat Earther. 😂
Space has always been there, sure, but the part of the universe that we live in did have a start, there's a reason we have the cosmic background radiation
@@TheStockwell Okay, please accurately and honestly answer these items:
1. Where did the singularity come from or did it eternally exist throughout all of eternity past?
2. Where did the 1 iota of energy come from to trigger the singularity to 'bang' one day in eternity?
3. What forces of nature existed to allow the singularity to exist and to 'bang'?
4. What forces of nature allowed our current forces of nature to come into existence?
5. What exactly is 'space' and how exactly does space expand?
6. What exactly is 'time' and how exactly does time vary?
7. What exactly is 'gravity' and how exactly does gravity do what gravity does in this universe?
8. How exactly do numbers and mathematical constants exist in the universe for math to do what math does in this universe?
9. RED SHIFT: Consider the following: Modern science claims that energy cannot be created nor destroyed, it's one of the foundations of physics. 'IF' a photon red shifts, where does the energy from the red shifted photon go? And what makes that energy leave the photon?
10. CMBR from a singular big bang should be long gone by now and should not even be able to be seen by us.
11. There are other more 'normal' physical explanations for the 'red shift' observations.
@@Splarkszter CMBR: (Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation): Consider the following: Per QED (Quantum Electro Dynamics, whereby 'em' interacts with the electrons in atoms and molecules) and QCD (Quantum Chromo Dynamics, whereby 'em' interacts with the nucleus of atoms), matter has to exist for 'em' to be given off by that matter. What matter exists in outer space for that microwave 'em' to be seen by us? And 'if' it were from when matter first came into existence during the fairy tale of the 'singular big bang', that 'em' should be long gone by now and should not even be able to be seen by us.
BB -> Matter and 'em' are created -> 'em' moves at the speed of light, matter moves more slowly -> (Billions of years go by) -> matter (and us) here ..........................................'em' long gone. (And there is no matter 'out here' yet for any 'em' to come back to us via QED or QCD).
بالتوفيق
360 image view would be awsome
all these galaxies, still zero bishes
Sounds like Jen Taylor / Cortana. 👍
SPAAAAAAACE
If we looked far back enough would we see ourselves? I'm a bit confused when scientists talk about being able to see the universe as it was shortly after the big bang.
Actually the idea goes something like: If there are a finite number of possible energy configurations, then an infinite number of copies of each possible configuration must exist some arbitrary distance away.. So if you look far enough, you will see an exact-ish duplicate of yourself.
Also there is the notion that in a closed geometry universe, if you look in any direction deeply enough you will see the back of your own head, but most of the current science seems to point to flat geometry universe.
The easiest way to think about the time thing is to just start with the fact that when things are further away it takes longer for the light to travel that far. So the light we see today actually left the object some millions or billions of years ago. In some sense you can think of it like a time machine. The further away something is, the further back in time the light had to leave for us to catch it now. The distance=time relationship is arguably well correlated enough to consider extremely distant objects like galaxies temporally related rather than spacially. The obvious reference 0 being the Big Bang.
That's kinda the oversimplified way of looking at it, but it can help wrap your head around the craziness long enough to grasp the subtle differences of how things actually are on the nitty gritty level (red shift through cosmic expansion, etc.).
If we looked far back enough, we wouldn't see ourselves - because we weren't around back then. 🤔
@@thomasgoodwin2648 Thx for the reply, it's certainly baffling.
@@TheStockwell by ourselves I meant the Milkyway Galaxy.
@@indi1st517 If you think this is bad, don't even eyeball the madhole called quantum mechanics. Concepts like "it's only there if you look at it", "three 1/2 spins to turn once", "spooky action at a distance", "Quantum tunneling"... Guaranteed to pretzelize even the eggiest of eggheads. 🤯
We are exploring the infinite cosmos yet this only has 5k views I don't know how this doesn't excite the whole world
Simply because most people are asleep and/or distracted by things that don't really matter in the grand scheme of things. Can't blame them though, it's easier that way than to constantly have questions. The universe is very weird and the questioning never ends.
El Gordo is an interacting galaxy cluster in the early Universe (z = 0.87). The extreme properties of El Gordo in terms of its redshift, mass, and the collision velocity leads to strong (6.16 σ) tension with the ΛCDM model. The properties of El Gordo are however consistent with cosmological simulations in the framework of MOND due to more rapid structure formation. This galaxy cluster adds to the different arguments that the ΛCDM model is wrong.
"El Gordo" 🤣🤣
LOL
It means the big one or the fat one!
I like science and physics
The big bang and the "Bikini Islands".
∞
q buenaaaa. pero esta muy lejanos'?
those stars and galaxies might not exist anymore.
how do we really know that anything she is telling us is correct ? we don't . they don't know either.
Definitely
I see full James web space 🌌 NSIC GULSHAN KUMAR
Gravitational Lensing: Okay,
a. What exactly is 'gravity'? (And for those who claim that gravity is matter bending the fabric of spacetime, see 'b' and 'c').
b. What exactly is 'space' and how exactly does space bend?
c. What exactly is 'time' and how exactly does time bend?
What do you exactly mean by exactly
Why don't you look it up, Chester. We're not here to coddle anti-Science trolls.
You're welcome! 😸
@@metiusabt2581 "What do you exactly mean by exactly" Research the word 'exactly' and get back to me.
Do you possess the scientific expertise to comprehend the potential explanations? If so, I would like to inquire: Why is space considered isotropic and homogeneous? Additionally, what does it signify for its metric to be consistent at every point and in all directions, leading to uniform properties and structure irrespective of the chosen location and orientation?
@@SevenOfNineteen Do you possess the scientific expertise to comprehend the potential explanations? If so, answer these items:
THINGS MODERN SCIENCE DOES NOT APPARENTLY KNOW:
Consider the following:
a. Numbers: Modern science does not even know how numbers and certain mathematical constants exist for math to do what math does. (And nobody as of yet has been able to show me how numbers and certain mathematical constants can come from the Standard Model Of Particle Physics).
b. Space: Modern science does not even know what 'space' actually is nor how it could actually warp and expand.
c. Time: Modern science does not even know what 'time' actually is nor how it could actually warp and vary.
d. Gravity: Modern science does not even know what 'gravity' actually is nor how gravity actually does what it appears to do. And for those who claim that 'gravity' is matter warping the fabric of spacetime, see 'b' and 'c' above.
e. Speed of Light: 'Speed', distance divided by time, distance being two points in space with space between those two points. But yet, here again, modern science does not even know what space and time actually are that makes up 'speed' and they also claim that space can warp and expand and time can warp and vary, so how could they truly know even what the speed of light actually is that they utilize in many of the formulas? Speed of light should also warp, expand and vary depending upon what space and time it was in. And if the speed of light can warp, expand and vary in space and time, how then do far away astronomical observations actually work that are based upon light and the speed of light that could warp, expand and vary in actual reality?
f. Photons: Modern science claims that energy cannot be created nor destroyed, it's one of the foundations of physics. First Law Of Thermodynamics: "Energy can neither be created nor destroyed."
A photon is usually depicted in a sine wave pattern with the 'e' and 'm' energy fields 90 degrees to each other. The 'e' and 'm' energy fields go out together and come back in together, over and over and over, doing so even across the vast universe as far as we can see.
Where does the energy in the energy fields go when both the 'e' and 'm' energy fields go to zero? And what causes the 'e' and 'm' energy fields to come back to 'full' from zero?
Also, 'if' a photon actually red shifts, where does the red shifted energy go and why does the photon red shift? And for those who claim space expanding causes a photon to red shift, see 'b' above.
Why does radio 'em' (large 'em' waves) have low energy and gamma 'em' (small 'em' waves) have high energy? And for those who say E = hf; see also 'b' and 'c' above. (f = frequency, cycles per second. But modern science claims space can warp and expand and time can warp and vary. If 'space' warps and expands and/or 'time' warps and varies, what does that do to 'E'? And why doesn't 'E' keep space from expanding and time from varying?).
g. Energy: Modern science claims that energy cannot be created nor destroyed, it's one of the foundations of physics. Hence, energy is either truly a finite amount and eternally existent, or modern science is wrong. First Law Of Thermodynamics: "Energy can neither be created nor destroyed." How exactly is 'energy' eternally existent?
h. Existence and Non-Existence side by side throughout all of eternity. How?
based and redpilled
*spaced
"El Gordo"? Jajaja. 🤣
Everyone already knows it's a lazar. And Maui is still suffering.
What’s with the Spanish?
LIARS.
women just can't narrate.
I must say I am finding harder and harder to believed the age of the universe, that the astrophysicist sare informing these days!!
❤️