that was a really excellent example of sword fighting... especially the moment when Rochefort step back and raised his head and neck back during d'Artagnan's lung for his neck..... he had their distance apart measured perfectly..... Rochefort was CLEARLY the better swordsman.... d'Artagnan's lunge forward was as far as he could possible reach... Rochefort knew he would be just out of reach... superb..!
Ok to remark just a bit more... this is the Movies and not to be believed for a realistic fight between trained men. A real fight would be All out Fast.. with an unrementing attack by both men with probable cuts and piercing from the distance of the long swords.. And if either manA got past manB's point it would be very likely that manA would skewer manB. And if both men got in close it would be Daggers Punches and grappling like Kung fu masters... Those sword fighters had very good hand to hand combat skills that were effective and deadly. Most probably ending with a grapple were one or both men Mortally stabs the other... Not too many survivers from a death fight when your opponant gets in close. Even if you survive the fight you would likely die from blood loss and infection. Most swordsmen died from cuts on hands and forearms.....
Am I the only one who LIKES this movie? Sure it isn't the book but which Film has ever reached the book, huh? Just a few, right? So I, as a person who read the book, think that this film is fine. It has good fighting scenes, a new plot, good actors and perfect images.
I loved this movie, too! I just don't understand why everyone hates it, and I'm so sad there won't be a sequel because of that. I love the actors (Logan Lerman is one of my favourite actors of all time) and the pace is great, only the finale was a little... not so obvious. I was expecting one more battle scene when I realized the movie was over. But still... great!
I like this movie. Not perfect, but so much fun, and so well cast (especially Freddie Fox as the king - adorable). The critics are humourless bores who either don't like the fantasy element (because every remake of this story should be just like the eleventy zillion previous versions), or they still bear a grudge against the director for making Resident Evil (another fun action movie).
cribbed that line from The Magnificent Seven. James Coburn shot a bandit who was galloping away at a great distance. His companion remarked "that was the greatest shot I have ever seen". Coburn replies "The worst ! I was aiming for the horse ...".
It would've been better if they had included Rochefort's dialogue from this deleted extended version. It added to his villainous character. And this fight might've been better without a lot of music that way we can hear the sword clanging and therefore be able to feel it more too.
Thanks for this. In the movie it was never explained why Rochefort constantly 'cheats' and tries the most 'dishonorable' ways to dispose of d'Artagnan, despite the fact that he's clearly an accomplished swordsman.
Nitzky 89 Because he knows like his father D"D'Artagnan is better and he is a cheater he likes to do it, Rochefort, is dishonorable at least in 1993 one it's supposedly he is a disgraced musketeer who sold out Dartagnan's father a fellow Musketeer and also sold out King Louis the father of the young one in that movie, as a result, the King was assassinated and Dartagnan Sr died trying to protect him at the hands of Rochefort hence why that one wears an eye patch does he have one in this version according to his biography Rochefort is rugged ruthless mean insane psychotic and uncaring don't all those fit
you can see plain as day how different their styles are, rochefort style is balanced, very controlled, while d'Artagnan's looks a great deal wilder and more passionate.
What didn't make sense at all is that D'Artagnan is a very rookie swordsman who has talent but lacks real skill and battle experience and he makes up for the lack of them with his endurance and stamina but that shouldn't count much cause as you see Rochefort was basically the best swordsman in whole France or one of the best possibly, with DOZENS YEARS of battle experience and you can clearly see that in the duel. Both this version and the theatrical cut show that Rochefort for most of the fight toyed with D'Artagnan. Using a legendary actor like Mads Mikkelsen for a character like this and give him this extremely anti-climatic death is one of the plot holes of the movie, one of the biggest probably.
Dartagnan may not be very experienced I doubt thats true though his dad taught him but once Rochefort says I killed your father or however he said it Dartagnan does not need skill he has anger to guide him
Thank you so much for uploading this, I've been waiting to catch the extended scenes online for ages! Any chance you've got some more of them up your sleeves?
Me hubiera gustado más que el alto rango hubiera disparado una vez, fallando, e inmediatamente rocheford le hubiera ordenado que se detuviese porque, a pesar de querer ganar sin importar la forma (dicho por el momentos antes) al fin estaba disfrutando de un duelo a su altura. Ello daría algo de honorabilidad al personaje, dentro de su villanía, y enriquecería la rivalidad dartagnan-rocheford
according the the first novel,D'Artagnan and Roshefoure fought three times between each other and after the thirth duel they became friends.in the second novel,D'Artagnan killed Roshefoure by accident.
Yes he did read the book. And it is exactly how he said it is, it is just in the movies Rochefort being portraited as super villain to be killed in the end.
My God! The last adaptation, The Musketeer, at least gave us a balls-to-the-wall badass ladder fight, this entire duel takes place on ONE. FUCKING. ROOF!!! They didn't even throw in a fucking rope swing action!
I always disliked how Rochefort has been portrayed in all the 3 musketeers movies. In the book he not only survives but he and d'artagnan pretty much become friends. (After fighting several duels of course). I wish they made a book accurate Rochefort for once.
I don't really understand the ending there, was he supposed to have shot the sword? Is that why it was in the air so long? Did she think he had purposely shot the sword in order to give d'Artagnan time to catch it? Is that why she said good shot? Because clearly it would have made more sense just to shoot his opponent. None of it made sense, probably my denseness though.
Weird interpretation of the book and their relationship. Because they are suppose to fight thrice , D'atargon winning all, settle their scores and they eventually become friends. !
yeah but modern audiences dont want that do they?? they want hero vs villian with the bad guy losing and the hero getting the girl. when in the book as well D'Artagnan and Constance dont end up together, his arrogance and lust eventually lead to Milady killing Constance, while Constance stays married n for the most part faithful to her husband
@@aprilgosa5779 one year later, but for future reference, Rochefort barely appears in the book, more of a menacing shadow than active villain, and never killed D'artagnan's father
See the page title. This is an extended version of the scene, including a lot of stuff that was cut, which therefore they didn't finish the effects for.
This would have been even better, than its final cut in the movie. I kinda like that movie, but come on. Why did the had to cut this scene? Ok: "That's my man" line was terrible.
Si verlo mola, pero las películas ya se pasan, como uno se puede enfrentar a 10 como mínimo, en la esgrima con sable, espada o flor ya son 3 o 4 y es tan difícil y ya no fe digo nada la esgrima de espada roperá. Hay que ser más realista dos tres contra uno y como mucho. Y tienes que tener destreza y una persona con una suerte de 8, 8,5 sobre 10.
1. Can't say the fight itself was all that impressive 2. Why were the backgrounds constantly cut out? 3. The "MY man" line was awful 4. The shoot-at-one-thing-hit-another gag? OLD!
Actually depends sword techniques in the past did include grabbing the blade people as skilled as them (which is implied) would know how to do so properly also, die or lose some skin, skin any day of the week.
nobody cares about the book they are not supposed to be friends I would not be friends if someone killed my daddy I would do what he just did make a rochefort K Bab out of him I spelled that wrong
c'est insupportable de voir des acteurs puceaux de la vie, ou des femmes de 40 kilos incarner nos héros!! et je parle meme pas des noirs jouant les roles de heros blancs!!! Insupportable!!!
That ought to be the worse fight choreography I ever seen, along with the worse abuse of cliches and pop culture I ever seen. Not to mention the poor acting...Jesus.
"My name is d'Artagnan. You killed my father. Prepare to die."
that was a really excellent example of sword fighting... especially the moment when Rochefort step back and raised his head and neck back during d'Artagnan's lung for his neck..... he had their distance apart measured perfectly..... Rochefort was CLEARLY the better swordsman.... d'Artagnan's lunge forward was as far as he could possible reach... Rochefort knew he would be just out of reach... superb..!
+john massey you know nothing
+clydewmorgan No, he's right. The 1974 version of the fight between d'Artagnan and Comte de Rochefort is stylistically wrong! This one is better.
Surgus OfTheBlack I have seen very few as bad as this one and if it better than the other, that does not redeem it at all
clydewmorgan I quite enjoyed parts of this one. Obviously there is a lot of Hollywood fiction in this fight but still quite good.
Ok to remark just a bit more... this is the Movies and not to be believed for a realistic fight between trained men. A real fight would be All out Fast.. with an unrementing attack by both men with probable cuts and piercing from the distance of the long swords.. And if either manA got past manB's point it would be very likely that manA would skewer manB. And if both men got in close it would be Daggers Punches and grappling like Kung fu masters... Those sword fighters had very good hand to hand combat skills that were effective and deadly. Most probably ending with a grapple were one or both men Mortally stabs the other... Not too many survivers from a death fight when your opponant gets in close. Even if you survive the fight you would likely die from blood loss and infection. Most swordsmen died from cuts on hands and forearms.....
Am I the only one who LIKES this movie? Sure it isn't the book but which Film has ever reached the book, huh? Just a few, right?
So I, as a person who read the book, think that this film is fine.
It has good fighting scenes, a new plot, good actors and perfect images.
I like it a lot!!!"!"
Moony Pokerfae i don't like it because I LOVE IT!!
I loved this movie, too! I just don't understand why everyone hates it, and I'm so sad there won't be a sequel because of that. I love the actors (Logan Lerman is one of my favourite actors of all time) and the pace is great, only the finale was a little... not so obvious. I was expecting one more battle scene when I realized the movie was over. But still... great!
I like this movie. Not perfect, but so much fun, and so well cast (especially Freddie Fox as the king - adorable). The critics are humourless bores who either don't like the fantasy element (because every remake of this story should be just like the eleventy zillion previous versions), or they still bear a grudge against the director for making Resident Evil (another fun action movie).
agreed. you don't always have to follow the book
I love the moment at 2.06: "Oh for f***'s sake,"
"That was an incredible shot."
"Not really; I was aiming for his head."
Even the Three Musketeers parodies Firefly.
Geronimo with Wes Studi
Kiefer as Athos could make that shot to the head with his eyes closed LOL
"Not really, I was aiming for his head" fracking slay me. Still laughing!
What was he trying to do? And what did he end up hitting, because I didn't see anything?
cribbed that line from The Magnificent Seven. James Coburn shot a bandit who was galloping away at a great distance. His companion remarked "that was the greatest shot I have ever seen". Coburn replies "The worst ! I was aiming for the horse ...".
"That's my man." Wow. That's a really, really bad line. No wonder they took it out.
They could have just looped it.
And I still wonder why they hired Paul fucking WS Anderson to direct it?
Yes same pinch
Isn't quite the same without the epic soundtrack, though... but the choreography stays amazing as always!
It would've been better if they had included Rochefort's dialogue from this deleted extended version. It added to his villainous character. And this fight might've been better without a lot of music that way we can hear the sword clanging and therefore be able to feel it more too.
Thanks for this. In the movie it was never explained why Rochefort constantly 'cheats' and tries the most 'dishonorable' ways to dispose of d'Artagnan, despite the fact that he's clearly an accomplished swordsman.
Nitzky 89 Because he knows like his father D"D'Artagnan is better and he is a cheater he likes to do it, Rochefort, is dishonorable at least in 1993 one it's supposedly he is a disgraced musketeer who sold out Dartagnan's father a fellow Musketeer and also sold out King Louis the father of the young one in that movie, as a result, the King was assassinated and Dartagnan Sr died trying to protect him at the hands of Rochefort hence why that one wears an eye patch does he have one in this version according to his biography Rochefort is rugged ruthless mean insane psychotic and uncaring don't all those fit
well, Rochefort is clearly a disilusioned knight, who only find away to kill as fast as possible, to hell with honour
you can see plain as day how different their styles are, rochefort style is balanced, very controlled, while d'Artagnan's looks a great deal wilder and more passionate.
What didn't make sense at all is that D'Artagnan is a very rookie swordsman who has talent but lacks real skill and battle experience and he makes up for the lack of them with his endurance and stamina but that shouldn't count much cause as you see Rochefort was basically the best swordsman in whole France or one of the best possibly, with DOZENS YEARS of battle experience and you can clearly see that in the duel. Both this version and the theatrical cut show that Rochefort for most of the fight toyed with D'Artagnan. Using a legendary actor like Mads Mikkelsen for a character like this and give him this extremely anti-climatic death is one of the plot holes of the movie, one of the biggest probably.
Dartagnan may not be very experienced I doubt thats true though his dad taught him but once Rochefort says I killed your father or however he said it Dartagnan does not need skill he has anger to guide him
rochefort made the mistake of toying with him, thats what gave d'artagnan the win
Without the music and the speed up editing tricks, this was a really good fight sequence.
Mads is just BADASS
. From The 13th Warrior to Hannibal! Badass!
Was he in the 13th warrior?
Great choreography!
the sword fight was nice atleast
I find it so depressing that for 50 years humanity is unable to make another good Muskteers flick...
Wait, has anyone else noticed that this version of Rochefort uses the exact same dagger as the version from 1974?
Only redeeming quality is Mads Mikaelsson
"I was aiming for his head" firefly reference, anyone?
I was actually reminded of The Magnificent Seven.
I got it
man if Rochefort was so intent on showing off he would've won this match in less than a minute.
NecraBriseis His vanity was his downfall
i just noticed that if you look closely at Rochefort's sword...thats the same sword used by Athos in The Musketeers on BBC
I actually noticed the same thing when watching the first episode of season one
The choreography of the fencing is pretty good, though.
Not a patch on Richard York vs Christopher Lee
Is it just me or a wire is seen at 1:58, 2:01, 2:02, was this unedited footage? There's also a green screen.
I'm confused about the end, where the bullet went?
Thank you so much for uploading this, I've been waiting to catch the extended scenes online for ages! Any chance you've got some more of them up your sleeves?
Me hubiera gustado más que el alto rango hubiera disparado una vez, fallando, e inmediatamente rocheford le hubiera ordenado que se detuviese porque, a pesar de querer ganar sin importar la forma (dicho por el momentos antes) al fin estaba disfrutando de un duelo a su altura. Ello daría algo de honorabilidad al personaje, dentro de su villanía, y enriquecería la rivalidad dartagnan-rocheford
I think they've mistaken the rapier stance for the sabre's and i thought that rapiers are poor cutters?
So, who killed him? Athos? Or D'Artagnan?
2:01 You can see the movie set due editing.
duh, this is what this video is supposed to be
Parry repose! That's the winning point to D'artagnan! I learned that in fencing years ago.
love the greenscreen at 2.00... :(
For once I would like to see the baddie win. Screw the young guy.
according the the first novel,D'Artagnan and Roshefoure fought three times between each other and after the thirth duel they became friends.in the second novel,D'Artagnan killed Roshefoure by accident.
But he has to come back in Percy Jackson
sure you read the book? it's Rochefort
Yes he did read the book. And it is exactly how he said it is, it is just in the movies Rochefort being portraited as super villain to be killed in the end.
well yeh, but that would sort of screw up the movie instead with artie dead
In the movie of 1993 rochefort kill d'artagnian's father
In the book his father's still alive, and Rochefort insulted D'artagnians horse.
@@Skycat590 well I would still duel with him if he did not apologize to the horse LOL or my dog oh man he would be plenty sorry
Iam glad they changed it to he killed his father insulted his horse though I get it some may not get it
Is that a "sniper musket"? And a leather biker jacket, with a zipper?
Seems totally accurate for early 1600s.
I prefer the 1993 version but this is entertaining but don't take it too serious
"1:05 hard scoping noob"
hey! not fair, no one should interrupt a duel...
Sorry Constance but that's my man... 😂😡
d,Artagnan ♥
My God! The last adaptation, The Musketeer, at least gave us a balls-to-the-wall badass ladder fight, this entire duel takes place on ONE. FUCKING. ROOF!!! They didn't even throw in a fucking rope swing action!
I always disliked how Rochefort has been portrayed in all the 3 musketeers movies. In the book he not only survives but he and d'artagnan pretty much become friends. (After fighting several duels of course). I wish they made a book accurate Rochefort for once.
"Lady, Get out of me w-GNGH!"
Throwing cuts with a rapier
So this footage was bootlegged off the special effects stage?
Rochefort was toying around until he almost got caught in the neck. Then he took it a bit more serious
2:01 why do we see greenscreen? was this not part of the movie and therefore not edited?
I don't really understand the ending there, was he supposed to have shot the sword? Is that why it was in the air so long? Did she think he had purposely shot the sword in order to give d'Artagnan time to catch it? Is that why she said good shot? Because clearly it would have made more sense just to shoot his opponent. None of it made sense, probably my denseness though.
You See A Greenscreen
Weird interpretation of the book and their relationship. Because they are suppose to fight thrice , D'atargon winning all, settle their scores and they eventually become friends. !
yeah but modern audiences dont want that do they?? they want hero vs villian with the bad guy losing and the hero getting the girl. when in the book as well D'Artagnan and Constance dont end up together, his arrogance and lust eventually lead to Milady killing Constance, while Constance stays married n for the most part faithful to her husband
+MrFloppy19 Modern audiences :D They would want Sherlock to date John. So you got me there :D
wait in the book the guy that killed his father ends up his friend what?
@@aprilgosa5779 one year later, but for future reference, Rochefort barely appears in the book, more of a menacing shadow than active villain, and never killed D'artagnan's father
**ting ting clang swoosh tingting shing shf shf clang ting**
Wow that chick hit that sniper with the floatiest, fakest looking swing I've ever seen in my life, and accompanied by a default-sounding audio clip.
This is not the movie version, this is the early, extended edit.
The green scene with a sniper rifle?🤣🤣
William Hobbs work on the 1973/4 versions is far superior.
High school D'Artagnan ! :))
Why is there green-screen?
+Milady de Winter, because they hasn't done the editing part yet.
See the page title. This is an extended version of the scene, including a lot of stuff that was cut, which therefore they didn't finish the effects for.
Are they using cappoferro techniques?
Mads Mikkelsen is the best villain of this generation...
this is directors cut, isnt it?
dats mah man XD
she can have him.
This would have been even better, than its final cut in the movie.
I kinda like that movie, but come on. Why did the had to cut this scene?
Ok: "That's my man" line was terrible.
Agreed on all counts.
wait a second....is that Mads Michelsen??????Hanibal from that TV show???????wow,he is the second reason i would watch this movie
He is the only reason to watch this movie at all.
Man they didn't glue sky and shit properly :D
Si verlo mola, pero las películas ya se pasan, como uno se puede enfrentar a 10 como mínimo, en la esgrima con sable, espada o flor ya son 3 o 4 y es tan difícil y ya no fe digo nada la esgrima de espada roperá. Hay que ser más realista dos tres contra uno y como mucho. Y tienes que tener destreza y una persona con una suerte de 8, 8,5 sobre 10.
I love sword fight movies. I'm a fan of the movies. Except the Russian ones
2:50 un error en la película?
To be continued? Buckingham, Constance and Milady are still alive
I also did not like that Constance dies she does not die in the 93 one heck she is hardly in it
nope.....
Well, the last thing I would of done was to have grabbed hold of the smug little shit and taken him down with me.
BULLET HERO SHOT
1:05 green screen
His a musketeer right?
Fallaron los efectos especiales en el minuto 2:50
Nice fight!! But why does d,Artagnan look like a girl ?
Percy Jackson vs. Dr Hannibal Lector
Worse than other scene so much :)
1:09 save the scene thought ;))
you almost don't see the wire catching him when d'Artagnan falls off the top of the roof , Just kidding it was plain as day
Percy Jackson vs. Dr Hannibal Lecter/Le Chiffre
What's with the green wrapped gargoyle at 2:00? And more poorly done CGI at 2:50> Is this joke?
1. Can't say the fight itself was all that impressive
2. Why were the backgrounds constantly cut out?
3. The "MY man" line was awful
4. The shoot-at-one-thing-hit-another gag? OLD!
i am this SUN guy!I AM DOWN!!!!!!!!HAJNAL!AURORA!!!!!!MY GENETIC COD!!!!!!?????
Am I the only one who wanted the bad guy to win in it? Dtargan was a big jerk in this movie, not at all likeable.
sumit dalal he was immature just like the book still I prefer Chris Odonnel this kid looks 12 he is not bad though he still won
yeah... that was the worst "Three musketeers" ever filmed...
Sorry but the girl playing Constance is not the best actress they could've got.
If they had grabbed my sword with their hand it would be game over i win
Actually depends sword techniques in the past did include grabbing the blade people as skilled as them (which is implied) would know how to do so properly also, die or lose some skin, skin any day of the week.
Mads Mikkelsen is the only reason to watch this movie.
How can a guy with one eye and therefore flawed depth perception, be a "master" fencer?
see-through eye patch? They Lied to us!
issyismusic jused 3D Glases... :-)
Or it could be that he's grown used to having only one eye, and has managed to adapt to the lack of depth perception.
I guess no one on the production team read the book...
nobody cares about the book they are not supposed to be friends I would not be friends if someone killed my daddy I would do what he just did make a rochefort K Bab out of him I spelled that wrong
1:08 was so funny. I almost want to see this movie. It looks gloriously awful.
That wasn't in the movie. That's "extended" aka cut footage.
ワイヤー見えてるけど
Wow, that was bad! I am so glad I did not watch this in cinema.
this wasnt ready yet, it says extended footage. believe me, ive got the film
Her acting was dry.
Lol
What a silly, worthless scene to match a silly worthless movie. Compare this to the 1973/74 version.
c'est insupportable de voir des acteurs puceaux de la vie, ou des femmes de 40 kilos incarner nos héros!! et je parle meme pas des noirs jouant les roles de heros blancs!!! Insupportable!!!
That ought to be the worse fight choreography I ever seen, along with the worse abuse of cliches and pop culture I ever seen. Not to mention the poor acting...Jesus.
+Titotus Gorefiend I'm surprised how many good actors are in this film. But good God it's terrible.