Coincidentally I had recently studied this first position in your Chess Crimes course, so I already knew the answer. I have purchased all your courses on Chessable and they are great. Your RUclips channel is also great.
Great topic! Of course more "tension" content is welcome =) . I enjoy to make connexions between your chessable courses and the YT channel series, its help to better memorize! Thanks again Can!
Can, as you know I am an older adult (age 65). Calculating complicated positions is difficult for me. I am working on it and am currently 2/3 of the way through your wonderful calculation course. My instinctive reaction to positions I can not calculate is to simplify them to the point where I then understand. The first game you and I played, I was doing fine then I released the tension by pushing a pawn. You then then kicked my butt. You also discussed it class. I remember it well and I now pay attention to tension in my games. I am getting better. Incidentally, the engine was not that upset when I pushed the pawn. But, my job then became very hard and your job became very easy.
I love this anectode Dan, thanks for bringing it up! Yes, I remember that game. You ripe the benefits of deeply analysing it and understanding it on a human level - despite what the engine says! The urge for simplification is understandable - but we have to be aware of it's drawbacks!
🎉🎉🎉💯💯 absolutely fantastic,a question that I have not been able to find an answer,yes I have books ,but books lack clear explanations , what I gather here is that an exchange must be made from a HOLISTIC point of view, hope am right, considering development,ect yes I would have made that mistake,as I would see that am giving the opponent double pawns😮an weakness not considereding the other aspects,not many books go in depth, another line you see in books is quite move,but no explanation thanks for this great insight,now i can use the tension 🎉🎉🎉
Dear Sir...gr8 instructive video...my question where we have london system like structure as in time stamp 5.58 where the white's dark square bishop is outside the pawn chain, is it ok to release the tension by cxe5? it seems not correct to me but I am not sure of why???
Thank you! With the bishop on f4, ...cxd4 is more logical as you are not awakening the terrible bishop on c1. But it depends on context. It surely prevents dxc5 and we sometimes follow with ...Qb6, pressuring the weak pawn on b2.
Perhaps one day I can create a course on this very topic :) Otherwise annotated games where the master explains why he kept the tension could be useful.
Coincidentally I had recently studied this first position in your Chess Crimes course, so I already knew the answer. I have purchased all your courses on Chessable and they are great. Your RUclips channel is also great.
It is such a pleasure to hear it, thank you so much!! Such motivating words really give me big motivation to keep on doing this.
Good advice. I'm guilty of that a lot. It usually does end badly.
Thank you so much! I hope this video will help reduce those mistakes a little!
Fabulous lesson, Dr Can! 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 Love this topic. Thank you!
My pleasure! Thank you for your kind feedback.
Great topic! Of course more "tension" content is welcome =) . I enjoy to make connexions between your chessable courses and the YT channel series, its help to better memorize! Thanks again Can!
Wonderful! Thank you Pierre! Perhaps I should create a course on whether or not to keep the tension? :)
I really understand what you are saying. Thanks!
So glad to hear it, thank you!
Can, as you know I am an older adult (age 65). Calculating complicated positions is difficult for me. I am working on it and am currently 2/3 of the way through your wonderful calculation course. My instinctive reaction to positions I can not calculate is to simplify them to the point where I then understand. The first game you and I played, I was doing fine then I released the tension by pushing a pawn. You then then kicked my butt. You also discussed it class. I remember it well and I now pay attention to tension in my games. I am getting better. Incidentally, the engine was not that upset when I pushed the pawn. But, my job then became very hard and your job became very easy.
I love this anectode Dan, thanks for bringing it up! Yes, I remember that game. You ripe the benefits of deeply analysing it and understanding it on a human level - despite what the engine says! The urge for simplification is understandable - but we have to be aware of it's drawbacks!
Cant get enough of your content sir you explain everything so well💙
So nice of you. More is along the way, stay tuned!
@@Dr.CansClinic Superb thank you💙
thats why i loose alot.now i understand better. thank you.
My pleasure! Awareness is the first step for cure!
I have really learnt alot from your videos
So happy to hear it! 😊 Gives me great joy as a teacher to teach people!
Great video, with very interesting examples. Well done!
Many thanks! More to follow!
Thank you for this, extremely useful and relevant as always. Keep them coming!
Thank you so much, more is coming surely!
gracias! excelente trabajo
Gracias!
🎉🎉🎉💯💯 absolutely fantastic,a question that I have not been able to find an answer,yes I have books ,but books lack clear explanations , what I gather here is that an exchange must be made from a HOLISTIC point of view, hope am right, considering development,ect yes I would have made that mistake,as I would see that am giving the opponent double pawns😮an weakness not considereding the other aspects,not many books go in depth, another line you see in books is quite move,but no explanation thanks for this great insight,now i can use the tension 🎉🎉🎉
I am so glad to hear this, thank you so much for your feedback. I am very happy to have changed your perception. More to come!
Excelente
Thank you so much!
Dear Sir...gr8 instructive video...my question where we have london system like structure as in time stamp 5.58 where the white's dark square bishop is outside the pawn chain, is it ok to release the tension by cxe5? it seems not correct to me but I am not sure of why???
Thank you! With the bishop on f4, ...cxd4 is more logical as you are not awakening the terrible bishop on c1. But it depends on context. It surely prevents dxc5 and we sometimes follow with ...Qb6, pressuring the weak pawn on b2.
I need bulldog system and chess mistakes videos
I don't know what bulldog system is... I made several videos about chess mistakes, including a Chessable course.
sweet
Thank you!
how can we study this topic? i need more i guess
Perhaps one day I can create a course on this very topic :) Otherwise annotated games where the master explains why he kept the tension could be useful.
Lol u can't analyse all these in blitz but thanks the knowledge is kept
Thanks for liking it.