Wow! Never come across such detail on the history of europe as yours! Youre too underrated and deserve more subs and views than this. Keep the effort going
this is very useful, I've recently been trying to make the most accurate timeline of Italy and this really helps, I'm making it like a family but countries, the reason I'm doing it is since people make shorts about the "family of Italy" but are clearly wrong I've been using a mixture of maps and Wikipedia to do it and this doesn't just show all of Germany as the HRE and instead shows all the small states, so thank you!!
Ok, i've just finished your video. And it's still good (for central Europe cause i've been focused on this region) even you recorded so tiny changes like polish-RS border changes.
Este video es una gran obra maestra, espero que el video sea tuyo y que no sea robado; pero igualmente gracias por este video, es bastante detallado y me encanto👍
@@leonardo_fratila english is not the only language in the world you know… in French, the word francs(franks) evolved into français (French), and in german, france is called frankreich, witch means the land of the franks. So some research before commenting nonsense
@@titcab8159 yes, and If you didn't realise the word "french" evolved from "frank" in English. But the way the people call themselves is just a part of who they are. They might identity as frank but their languege is not frankish, their ethnicity isn't all frankish, and their culture isn't frankish. Maybe the french are frankish from 1 point of view, but they are roman and celtic from the other points of view.
How does a skibidi toilet channel randomly upload the best video about European history in all of RUclips. A video so good that honestly should be used in history class in every country on the continent was made by a channel dedicated to internet brainrot.This arguably the magnum opus of RUclips and i don't use that word lightly. I will note however that the borders sometimes are a little weird (interwar silesia looks kinda small for example) and that the Eastern bloc were puppets of the ussr for some to all of the cold war (romania and albania gained independence in the middle of it,while the rest gained independence in the late 80s), but these are minor nitpicks in this masterpiece.
I’ve always been interested in making history videos, but i make whatever i feel like at the end of the day, minecraft, skibidi toilet whatever, you never know what ill post next and when 💀
@@MiniWarpath Continue making such history content because it's astonishing how good this is and feel ashamed that my channel has more views than this mastery when i have put so much less effort (i do a lot more research than most shorts creators of my genre but the edits themselves don't take that long in comparison to this).
En este vídeo hay un error grave. Los visugodos llegaron a controlar todas la Península Ibérica durante casi 1 siglo, justo antes de las invasiones musulmanas. Lo digo porque no es cierto que hubiera una región de vascones o vascos no controlada por visigodos, y que de ahí surgiese el Reino de Asturias. Algunos historiadores musulmanes modernos en su empeño por modificar la historia repiten hasta la saciedad que esa región no fue controlada nunca por los visigodos, tratando de desacreditar así que el objetivo de la reconquista fuese restaurar el estado cultural y religioso que había con los visigodos antes de las invasiones musulmanas. Sin embargo, en primer lugar esa región que marcan como de vascos, ni siquiera se corresponde con los territorios históricamente vascones, que están situados a la misma altura pero 300 kilómetros más al este (entre Francia y España). Por otro lado, el rey de Asturias (Pelayo), en las fuentes cristianas de la época era conocido con el sobrenombre de "El visigodo". En las fuentes musulmanas era conocido con el sobrenombre de "El romano". Si se preguntan por qué los cristianos lo llamarían visigodo y los musulmanes lo llamarían romano, es fácil de responder. Y eso es debido a que los romanos hablaban latín y los visigodos también. Estos últimos concretamente latín vulgar (el del pueblo), con algunos regionalismos germánicos, ya que se trataba un pueblo germano que vivió dentro del Imperio Romano durante varios siglos. Pero a donde quiero llegar es que es una falacia de los historiadores modernos musulmanes eso de que el Reino de Asturias no proviene de una revuelta visigoda sino de vascones. En primer lugar, porque los dos mundos enfrentados (cristianos y musulmanes), reconocen a su líder (Pelayo) como romano y visigodo (hablaba latín en cualquier caso, y no vasco). Por ende, si esa región que han marcado como vasca, hubiese sido realmente de población vasca, jamás hubiesen seguido ni tenido, ni hecho rey a un señor que visigodo o romano, no era vasco y hablaba latín. Lo dicho, los vascos estaban más al este (exactamente donde están hoy en día, que no se han movido de ahí), y no tienen nada que ver con la fundación del Reino de Asturias, que sentó las bases de su fundación en lo romano, lo visigido y en el catolicismo, y su objetivo era resuperarlos en todo el territorio penínsular, y fue el principio de lo que muchos siglos después sería España.
This video is great my only complaint is that you didn't mark the countrys that make up the UK but you put autonomous regions and the republics of the USSR
Really good video! But i must say that you made some mistakes in the Emilia-Romagna region during the late middle ages. (Bologna should be indipendent, Ferrara should be indipendent too and own the Polesine territory in the north, you forgot the Pallavicino state and the Lando state near Parma and Piacenza, and Romagna used to be divided in several indipendent lordships and marches)
Postoje stvari koje su za ispraviti. 633 godine je formirana prva srpska država, a na karti je napisano : Southern Slavs. To nije fer. Zatim, Duklja, Raška, Bosna su takođe srpske države. Zatim, Croatia je pod Ugarskom od 1102 godine ! Zatim, Hrvati su došli na Balkan kao white Croatians, black and red croats, a na mapi je prikazano da su Croats već na Balkanu, što nije moguće !
Why didn't you do the same year by year thing with the centuries prior to 750BC for Europe? There had been previous Paleo-European peoples (like Basques) living there, who had built upon further centuires of Neolithic civilisation through agriculture, like the Vinĉa culture in Serbia or that of the Cucuteni-Trypillia culture in Romania. Whilst I get that there's not much of these in material or knowledge, you could've just put these Paleo-European cultures there in just a general spread of the area of where their range was located, alongside others from around Europe. Not hating the video (as the rest was pretty good)but just giving some feedback.
good video except i would like to point out that up to 1967 the Golan was Syrian, and the west bank was jordanian, also since 1993 many big west bank citys have been transfered to the PLO, also lebanon was in a civil war from 1975-1990, and the southern part of Lebanon was occupied by Israel from 1985-2000. also i noticed u included ssr's so u missed the Karelo-Finnish ssr (1940-1956). The golan heights was part of french syria. except for that pretty spot on video i enjoyed it
Everyone always messes the Bulgarian Empires. One guy makes a mistake and then you all copy your homework from him. Go and watch each country's history separetely and then combine them, it will be more accurate, than watching some Europe history video and basing yours on it
The Romagna and Spoleto should be part of the HRE during the reign of the Hohenstaufen. The powerful Staufen emperors exerted authority and suzerainty over these lands-witness Frederick II’s Vicars General of Romagna and Spoleto respectively which were directly appointed imperial viceroys. It was not until the 14th century, and really even the 15th century that the Papal States functionally constituted the Romagna and Spoleto.
Very minor corrections: You do for a small second have Emperors Constantius and Severus with the inappropriate titles (Severus Augustus, Constantius Caesar - I think you forgot to change Constantius to Constantine). Also, it would be Diocletian Augustus and Maximian Augustus, not "Augusti". Oh, and personally, I am really not a fan of when English speaking people use "Reich" to differentiate Hitler-Germany from any other previous form of Germany. That's just not how anyone back then used the word, nor how modern Germans use it - and it's just not what that word means. Reich means something like "Dominion", and is used for Holy Roman Germany, Wilhelmine Germany, as well as the Roman Empire (Römisches Reich), as well as France (Frank-Reich) and any word for a polity that includes -dom in English (Kingdom, Tsardom = Königreich, Zarenreich). And trust us, we are very, very sensitive when it comes to purging Nazi-terminology from our language. Reich just isn't one. In Germany, you'd probably call it Nazi-Germany, or the "NS-Regime", or anything like that. ("Greater German Reich" is fine though, that's definitely a fairly specific name; even though here in Germany we would probably put it in quotation marks).
14:17 That border change in Ukraine, emm, it's just according to Putin and Duma, de iure it's still Ukrainian territory occupied by Russia. There it looks as if Ukraine is occupying it's own territory.
again, it begin to be fun, i am not take any side, but it is boring for me one side(nato) against second side(russia) , no beggining real chaos and many sides but we even dont know them, like in game of thrones, the same was in 30 years war in europe, but with world now
If you give me France with the same color as the Frankish kingdom, then you should give me Spain with the same color as the Visigoth kingdom and Italy as the Lombard kingdom, Spain is not just the kingdom of Castile
Rome’s rise to power had nothing to do with Thermopylae. Even if the Persians conquered Greece, the empire was already in a slow decline and would have neither the power, nor resources to subdue Rome or Carthage.
One mistake: sueboi were not one of the germanic tribes, they were larger group wherein many (which are independent in your video) tribes were included. But it's good so far, good move was not to identify Vandali with Przeworsk Culture.
And the name Polska/Polonia/poland was created by the reign of Boleslav I - king of Poland, before polanie where only small tribe and nemes in other languages for many close to each other tribes where lengyen in hungarian, licikaviki or just wenden (for all slavs) by germans, or by its dimunitive lęxъ by ruthenians.
You should mark more "western" slavic tribes, and in these times there were no evidential diversity so you could write just slavs, not particularly southern. But these are only small mistakes so it's still good so far.
@@belittekleiner1 wasn’t trying to imply the video being long means it’s good. I respect the dedication the mapper made but obviously i know there are inaccuracies and biases. I just want to know what you consider the most inaccurate parts in the video
![History of Religion in Europe [0-2019] Avrupa Din Tarihi](/img/1.gif)
The level of detail is astounding. If only I could zoom in further. You’ve done an incredible job
very impressive details, possibly the best history of Europe yet
12:48 uffff that music is so nostalgic
remember, never trace danzig
Gdańsk
Mother
I did...
You mean Gdańsk
@@archaon1400 not gdańsk but danzig mapper
Bro, this is so good, level of details is just amazing!!! You deserve much more!!!
Wow! Never come across such detail on the history of europe as yours! Youre too underrated and deserve more subs and views than this. Keep the effort going
there are no details
An absolute amazing job well done 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
LEGIT!! This must have taken forever to do! Well done.
Amazing Job! Wayyyy better than expected
this is very useful, I've recently been trying to make the most accurate timeline of Italy and this really helps, I'm making it like a family but countries, the reason I'm doing it is since people make shorts about the "family of Italy" but are clearly wrong I've been using a mixture of maps and Wikipedia to do it and this doesn't just show all of Germany as the HRE and instead shows all the small states, so thank you!!
Very well done . High quality. Historically accurate. Altogether a great video.
its not accurate lol
@@filip-y2l same with u
Prove it@@filip-y2l
YOU ATE TS UP DUDE!! SO PROUD OML ❤️❤️
My god, this is incredible
I KNOW RIGHT, prob one of the best mapping vids
This and Prussian mapping’s video are so good
@@jackaljayden7249 what?? he just copied other mapping videos and put them in one video. thats still not accurate
Ok, i've just finished your video. And it's still good (for central Europe cause i've been focused on this region) even you recorded so tiny changes like polish-RS border changes.
masterpiece
This is really good!
Este video es una gran obra maestra, espero que el video sea tuyo y que no sea robado; pero igualmente gracias por este video, es bastante detallado y me encanto👍
underrated
You, sir, are an artist!
Great job for making this must look you long time.
12:48 Where's the song that plays here from? It sounds so familiar but I can't pinpoint where it's from.
glorious morning, music is given credit in both outro and description
@@MiniWarpath you're right, sorry, I wasn't paying attention.
I like that you showed Gorani in Bulgaria.
The best animated map of Europe I've seen so far!
Well done, lad.
Incredible!
Europe having conflicts and stuff
Mongols: Let me introduce myself
Centuries later in the century 20
Russia:I will do the same thing you did to me😊
my new favorite video
Having NATO instead of the EU in modern times is definitely a choice...
Whats crazy is how Frankish empire/Kingdom of France/France has stayed for so long while so many countries dissapeared or appeared
Frankish empire and france is different
@@leonardo_fratila Frankish empire is the empire of the franks (francs in French) and even the kigdom of the franks is considered as france
@@titcab8159 yes, frankish empire is the empire of franks, not of french.
@@leonardo_fratila english is not the only language in the world you know… in French, the word francs(franks) evolved into français (French), and in german, france is called frankreich, witch means the land of the franks. So some research before commenting nonsense
@@titcab8159 yes, and If you didn't realise the word "french" evolved from "frank" in English. But the way the people call themselves is just a part of who they are. They might identity as frank but their languege is not frankish, their ethnicity isn't all frankish, and their culture isn't frankish. Maybe the french are frankish from 1 point of view, but they are roman and celtic from the other points of view.
How does a skibidi toilet channel randomly upload the best video about European history in all of RUclips. A video so good that honestly should be used in history class in every country on the continent was made by a channel dedicated to internet brainrot.This arguably the magnum opus of RUclips and i don't use that word lightly.
I will note however that the borders sometimes are a little weird (interwar silesia looks kinda small for example) and that the Eastern bloc were puppets of the ussr for some to all of the cold war (romania and albania gained independence in the middle of it,while the rest gained independence in the late 80s), but these are minor nitpicks in this masterpiece.
I’ve always been interested in making history videos, but i make whatever i feel like at the end of the day, minecraft, skibidi toilet whatever, you never know what ill post next and when 💀
@@MiniWarpath Continue making such history content because it's astonishing how good this is and feel ashamed that my channel has more views than this mastery when i have put so much less effort (i do a lot more research than most shorts creators of my genre but the edits themselves don't take that long in comparison to this).
Everything is extremely inaccurate, if you take anything in this video seriously you shouldnt map anymore
Mesmo tendo alguns erros ainda sim mostra um lado bom da história parabens
En este vídeo hay un error grave. Los visugodos llegaron a controlar todas la Península Ibérica durante casi 1 siglo, justo antes de las invasiones musulmanas.
Lo digo porque no es cierto que hubiera una región de vascones o vascos no controlada por visigodos, y que de ahí surgiese el Reino de Asturias.
Algunos historiadores musulmanes modernos en su empeño por modificar la historia repiten hasta la saciedad que esa región no fue controlada nunca por los visigodos, tratando de desacreditar así que el objetivo de la reconquista fuese restaurar el estado cultural y religioso que había con los visigodos antes de las invasiones musulmanas.
Sin embargo, en primer lugar esa región que marcan como de vascos, ni siquiera se corresponde con los territorios históricamente vascones, que están situados a la misma altura pero 300 kilómetros más al este (entre Francia y España).
Por otro lado, el rey de Asturias (Pelayo), en las fuentes cristianas de la época era conocido con el sobrenombre de "El visigodo". En las fuentes musulmanas era conocido con el sobrenombre de "El romano".
Si se preguntan por qué los cristianos lo llamarían visigodo y los musulmanes lo llamarían romano, es fácil de responder. Y eso es debido a que los romanos hablaban latín y los visigodos también. Estos últimos concretamente latín vulgar (el del pueblo), con algunos regionalismos germánicos, ya que se trataba un pueblo germano que vivió dentro del Imperio Romano durante varios siglos.
Pero a donde quiero llegar es que es una falacia de los historiadores modernos musulmanes eso de que el Reino de Asturias no proviene de una revuelta visigoda sino de vascones.
En primer lugar, porque los dos mundos enfrentados (cristianos y musulmanes), reconocen a su líder (Pelayo) como romano y visigodo (hablaba latín en cualquier caso, y no vasco).
Por ende, si esa región que han marcado como vasca, hubiese sido realmente de población vasca, jamás hubiesen seguido ni tenido, ni hecho rey a un señor que visigodo o romano, no era vasco y hablaba latín.
Lo dicho, los vascos estaban más al este (exactamente donde están hoy en día, que no se han movido de ahí), y no tienen nada que ver con la fundación del Reino de Asturias, que sentó las bases de su fundación en lo romano, lo visigido y en el catolicismo, y su objetivo era resuperarlos en todo el territorio penínsular, y fue el principio de lo que muchos siglos después sería España.
thanks for the info
i get mad when i see these high effort videos only getting 2k - 10k views at max there could be more videos i could be takling abt dont give up bro
The way you showed Austria Hungary and the German Empire (and the USSR and socialist Yugoslavia) is perfect. Thank you.
:)
kinda confusing, but if it is accurate it is good well done
its not
Well done :)
Просто и со вкусом, мне такие видео нравятся
How long have you been making this?
almost 2 months
Thats quite short considering the detailing. This is extremely impressive.
@@TheVoices69 there are no details, he copied other videos
@@filip-y2l yeah i know but that doesnt mean that it didnt take loads of effort
@@TheVoices69 ye, there is only effort with making video, but theres no long researching
This video is great my only complaint is that you didn't mark the countrys that make up the UK but you put autonomous regions and the republics of the USSR
thats fair thanks for pointing that out
Amazing
Really good video! But i must say that you made some mistakes in the Emilia-Romagna region during the late middle ages. (Bologna should be indipendent, Ferrara should be indipendent too and own the Polesine territory in the north, you forgot the Pallavicino state and the Lando state near Parma and Piacenza, and Romagna used to be divided in several indipendent lordships and marches)
Postoje stvari koje su za ispraviti.
633 godine je formirana prva srpska država, a na karti je napisano : Southern Slavs. To nije fer.
Zatim, Duklja, Raška, Bosna su takođe srpske države.
Zatim, Croatia je pod Ugarskom od 1102 godine !
Zatim, Hrvati su došli na Balkan kao white Croatians, black and red croats, a na mapi je prikazano da su Croats već na Balkanu, što nije moguće !
Why didn't you do the same year by year thing with the centuries prior to 750BC for Europe? There had been previous Paleo-European peoples (like Basques) living there, who had built upon further centuires of Neolithic civilisation through agriculture, like the Vinĉa culture in Serbia or that of the Cucuteni-Trypillia culture in Romania. Whilst I get that there's not much of these in material or knowledge, you could've just put these Paleo-European cultures there in just a general spread of the area of where their range was located, alongside others from around Europe. Not hating the video (as the rest was pretty good)but just giving some feedback.
This very cool and beatfull animation!
we are so back 🔥🔥🔥
good video except i would like to point out that up to 1967 the Golan was Syrian, and the west bank was jordanian, also since 1993 many big west bank citys have been transfered to the PLO, also lebanon was in a civil war from 1975-1990, and the southern part of Lebanon was occupied by Israel from 1985-2000. also i noticed u included ssr's so u missed the Karelo-Finnish ssr (1940-1956). The golan heights was part of french syria.
except for that pretty spot on video i enjoyed it
Everyone always messes the Bulgarian Empires. One guy makes a mistake and then you all copy your homework from him. Go and watch each country's history separetely and then combine them, it will be more accurate, than watching some Europe history video and basing yours on it
the ancient and antiquity periods would probably need some more work as what you show is very innacurate there, good work though
Good job! there are some mistakes here and there, but in general it's a very good video, congrats
The Romagna and Spoleto should be part of the HRE during the reign of the Hohenstaufen. The powerful Staufen emperors exerted authority and suzerainty over these lands-witness Frederick II’s Vicars General of Romagna and Spoleto respectively which were directly appointed imperial viceroys. It was not until the 14th century, and really even the 15th century that the Papal States functionally constituted the Romagna and Spoleto.
Eastern Roman Empire my beloved :(
Should've put a seizure warning on Novgorod
Maneiro! Só achei a qualidade da imagem meio baixa, não consegui ler algumas palavras.
Very minor corrections:
You do for a small second have Emperors Constantius and Severus with the inappropriate titles (Severus Augustus, Constantius Caesar - I think you forgot to change Constantius to Constantine). Also, it would be Diocletian Augustus and Maximian Augustus, not "Augusti".
Oh, and personally, I am really not a fan of when English speaking people use "Reich" to differentiate Hitler-Germany from any other previous form of Germany. That's just not how anyone back then used the word, nor how modern Germans use it - and it's just not what that word means. Reich means something like "Dominion", and is used for Holy Roman Germany, Wilhelmine Germany, as well as the Roman Empire (Römisches Reich), as well as France (Frank-Reich) and any word for a polity that includes -dom in English (Kingdom, Tsardom = Königreich, Zarenreich). And trust us, we are very, very sensitive when it comes to purging Nazi-terminology from our language. Reich just isn't one. In Germany, you'd probably call it Nazi-Germany, or the "NS-Regime", or anything like that. ("Greater German Reich" is fine though, that's definitely a fairly specific name; even though here in Germany we would probably put it in quotation marks).
Pathetically inaccurate, that’s actually getting crazier with each year
May be placed in some ”pov: bad mappers” category 🤧
For real
14:17 That border change in Ukraine, emm, it's just according to Putin and Duma, de iure it's still Ukrainian territory occupied by Russia. There it looks as if Ukraine is occupying it's own territory.
again, it begin to be fun, i am not take any side, but it is boring for me one side(nato) against second side(russia) , no beggining real chaos and many sides but we even dont know them, like in game of thrones, the same was in 30 years war in europe, but with world now
you mistyped Marcomanni people to Macromanni :)
thanks for feedback
Russia in 16th century? It’s kinda mistake because there was Muscovy instead of Russia.
In Sardinia Nuragic Civilization was established 1000 Years before Christ
better than history class
9:41
If you give me France with the same color as the Frankish kingdom, then you should give me Spain with the same color as the Visigoth kingdom and Italy as the Lombard kingdom, Spain is not just the kingdom of Castile
frankish kdm is a little darker than france but i see your point, thanks for bringing that up!
@@MiniWarpath thanks for clarifying but still good video
thank you very much if I make a version 3 ill take your words into consideration
Lots of mistakes, this is new history of Europe
Without spartan in Thermopiles no Rome, no Carthage, etc...
Rome’s rise to power had nothing to do with Thermopylae. Even if the Persians conquered Greece, the empire was already in a slow decline and would have neither the power, nor resources to subdue Rome or Carthage.
One mistake: sueboi were not one of the germanic tribes, they were larger group wherein many (which are independent in your video) tribes were included. But it's good so far, good move was not to identify Vandali with Przeworsk Culture.
And the name Polska/Polonia/poland was created by the reign of Boleslav I - king of Poland, before polanie where only small tribe and nemes in other languages for many close to each other tribes where lengyen in hungarian, licikaviki or just wenden (for all slavs) by germans, or by its dimunitive lęxъ by ruthenians.
Mount Lebanon and the Kurdish Principalities1!11
A minha única reclamação é que a Hungria nunca anexou a Croácia e sim união pessoal 😢
valid i could have shown hungary in way more detail
@@MiniWarpath bom que dá tempo de pesquisar sobre o tema
You should mark more "western" slavic tribes, and in these times there were no evidential diversity so you could write just slavs, not particularly southern. But these are only small mistakes so it's still good so far.
Vid is 14:44 long
Nice tume
not accurate
Why?
Tell why instead of crying about it
@@Savonianmapper17609 there is no accurate europe every year video, change my mind
@@filip-y2l no, you change my mind
@@filip-y2l still didnt tell why.
Неназывалась Русь Киевской. Русь.
There is no "kyivian" its just kievian, stop coping ukrobot
Moscvobot?
@@БогданТру Kiev
really REALLY bad
what can be improved
@@MiniWarpath everything, the borders are so inaccurate they are unusable
@@belittekleiner1 like an example? Idk on all if it being bad/innacurate?
Any videos like this that you consider “accurate”
@@kaazmire5358 just because it's a long video doesnt mean its good the borders are awfully drawn even if the info is partly correct
@@belittekleiner1 wasn’t trying to imply the video being long means it’s good. I respect the dedication the mapper made but obviously i know there are inaccuracies and biases. I just want to know what you consider the most inaccurate parts in the video
terrible video, basically alt history
just like u
@@Daldiepie ???
What's inaccurate?
Очень Круто!
now you can move Kursk, Bryansk, Belgorod and Kuban to Ukraine:)
As well as Crimea , Donetsk , and Lugansk to Russia)Also Ukraine doesn’t control even 20% of Kursk , Bransk and Belgorod region
What a great work !!!