NO ONE wants that- not the State, not the Defense, especially not LE or the University! The delay is about buying time before the culpability of LE and the local judiciary in the unalivings. ruclips.net/video/N1BtnfYalD4/видео.html
I don't want to see the trial quickly, I want a judge who will require the prosecution to give the defense council ample information to allow defense council to prepare a defense. This judge takes a week to rule on putting a bar of soap in the men's room.
Why are people saying that the state is worried, when they’re doing their job but when the defense files anything everyone says they’re doing their job? Both sides are doing their job
The state will not turn over discovery, is cherry-picking what’s “relevant” and is trying to bar the cell phone expert, NO they aren’t doing their job.
Like others, I have my criticisms of the prosecution. But I must admit that if my last case as a decades-long prosecutor in a small county was being scrutinized by the entire world, and all anyone outside of my county would remember me for is that I won or lost this case, I'd be fighting tooth and nail too.
@2:48 (I live a few miles from here) Wawawai is pronounced: Wah-why-ee 🙏🏼 Which originates from ‘Wawawa’, which translates to “Council Grounds” for the Nez Perce and Palouse tribes. Edit/addition: cell service can be pretty spotty out there.
The state has no right to deny Bryan his rights and if they have a slam dunk case why would they care obviously the state doesn't have what they say they do or why would they worry about what the defense uses this should be criminal for the state to try to deny Bryan a fair trial.
No you're wrong! The defense has 95% of the discovery and the other 5% is due in September of 2024 this year and the prosecution is waiting for a few of the agencies to get their final reports in, and once they get them, they will be handed over to the defense. It's the defense who is using these hearings like a trial. Let's not forget it was the defense who demanded a gag order.
How can they deny him rights to his defense when he has not gotten all discovery to be able to defend himself? How can you defend yourself when you don't know exactly what you are accused of exactly besides murder of course. Anyone can say anyone commited murder but you must provide why, when, where, how. And in that case he can then say well yes, that is wrong because I was here at so and so. Crooked court injustice systems at work here.
I'm 78 years old. Am I going to live long enough to see this case go to trial? It has certainly given me more to live for. I have had a very blessed life. I'm sorry these beautiful kids were robbed of the same. I think Ann Taylor is playing games to stall the case and it doesn't look good for the Defense.
It's good to be in America cause we all can express our opinions. THERE HAVE BEEN MANY CONVITIONS WITH A LOT LESS EVIDENCE THOUGHT. The feds would not place their reputation on the line for any defendant including BK. It’s like BK is any more or less important than anyone else. The feds are notorious for dragging their feet in most cases. There a lot of conspiracy theories going around but the FBI doesn’t care if its’ BK or another suspect(Their coming after you). Probable cause and it's legal as it has been done for many, many years. When DNA shows up from someone means it's PC. That does not mean guilty. I'm sure if my DNA showed up on an item up under neath a dead body, I would be hauled to jail. Probable cause, and it's legal as it has been done for many, many years. They only have to report(To the defense) the connection and not 100% for an arrest. There is horrible communication and most of these things should have been on the table by now. I don't think that the state is hiding anything as there is a lack of control from the judge. The judge is not holding either side with 100% conviction. The prosecution would not put this entire case and their lively hoods for one defendant. When DNA shows up from someone means it's PC. That does not mean guilty. I'm sure if my DNA showed up on an item under neath a dead body, I would be hauled to jail. Definition of Probable Cause - Probable cause means that a reasonable person would believe that a crime was in the process of being committed, had been committed, or was going to be committed. Legal Repercussions of Probable Cause - Probable cause is enough for a search or arrest warrant. What is an example of a probable cause? A good example of probable cause to search a property is the scenario of a drug house. Police may know (or at least highly suspect) that the property is used for selling drugs, and they want to obtain a warrant. To get a warrant, they will need to convince a judge a crime is being committed at the location
Exactly 💯 She combes thru state's evidence, put her "discusting filthy defendant" exactly where the states evidence say's he was AS A DEFENSE. 😡 Because she knows no one can pinpoint EXACT LOCATION - JUST APPROXIMATE! 😡😡 YOUR EXACTLY 💯 CORRECT ANN TAYLOR PLAYING GAMES - """"""BECAUSE THEY HAVEN'T A DEFENSE """" 😡
@@mrasic3507 "Because she knows no one can pinpoint EXACT LOCATION - JUST APPROXIMATE!" If "no one" can prove BK's exact location when the murders occurred, maybe the state shouldn't have charged him.
Pullman, WA here!! “Wuh-Why-Eee” park, like many things in Whitman County, is a rural, isolated park on the steep breaks of the Snake River. I never have cell service when there or for about twenty minutes when traveling to and from. I think this will be their argument…
Agree, but defense will need to refute any evidence that shows he was traveling to Moscow just before murders. AT claims the white car in a video shown driving past Floyd's can't be Kohberger since he was elsewhere. I think she's trying to put the burden on BT to prove he wasn't in Moscow, and that's a problem BT has because he may only have cell pings that are from a tower that covers several mile radius.
@@AlejandrMartínez-g4d We probably only know 1% of the evidence that they have on him. We won’t know until the trial. They release the bare minimum to the public in the probable cause just to feed us something, anything. We won’t find out anything more until that trial begins, which it seems won’t start until at least 2025, probably 26. That’s not fair to the victims or their families.
We may never know what the state does and does not have. It may not be televised, the news industry does a horribly bad job of noting and reporting details, and Freedom of Informaion Act requests may take more than seventy years to get anything worthwhile.
They have the right to know so they can do an investigation into where he was, receipts, cameras, and whatever else would prove his alibi, where he was.
That's the strangest thing I have ever heard, Natalie. Are you sure you understand the significance of an alibi to someone who is accused of committing murder?
This is NOT one of the best YT channels on true crime out there, this is the BEST in accurate and in depth explanation on the documents and motions in cases like the Idaho 4, Murdaugh, Karen Reed from a real Cali grown lawyer
May I ask.. do you know how the state figured out it was KB's father? I know they went thru his trash, but how did they know it was him in the first place?
@@marymackxo maybe I should rephrase that. I know what you said, but how did they figure out it was the father? Did he provide his dna to a lab a long time ago checking his family tree?
How can the State use electronic location in their PCA and not allow the defense to use it to counter the PCA. It is allowed in Idaho in the Daybell trials.
Perhaps, the Prosecution are getting really nervous. With this alibi coming to light..IF the Defense is onto something & the expert is going to be a Defense witness. I would think he's sure about his findings. Because, it's his reputation on the line.
That's what I'm thinking. This expert has been on 24Hr., Dateline, True Crime & others I can't remember. He usually is a witness for the Prosecutor. First time for the Defense. I think the Prosecutor are really nervous now. I hope the true murderers should be too. DM & maybe BF, I can just image how they feel.
@@Dee-wd8lilook at the "experts" AH hired in the Depp case. Money can get people to say anything. But I agree the expert probably has something the state is worried about because the state knows they are setting BK up.
@@Dee-wd8liit’s speculated that Sy Re was at the scene of the crime with Anne Taylor along with the FBI as the defense expert. What if he was there to investigate and now he’s a defense witness 🤔
🤣 The defense has no alibi. Driving around is not an alibi without video or witness statements. If I was sitting in jail and had a solid alibi, you bet your boots I would provide it. Why wouldn’t you? The defense has no alibi and the prosecution knows this and trying to enforce the laws on the books. If you allow this then the next defendant could say anything like I was laying in bed watching movies without any corroborating evidence to prove it.
@@willbeard4835maybe she had everything she needed from the house, so she agreed to the destruction. Remember when the prosecution, and defense, along with the FBI went to visit the house one last time? Guess who was part of the defense expert, Sy Re the defense expert to testify about BK’s alibi.
@@theboujieliberian i hope so. Even if the jury just looked at the house from the outside they would be able to recognize 4 people could not be stabbed to death and the surviving two roommates didn't hear it
Peter, I love how you present your analysis in as much of an unbiased way as you can! You really promote critical thinking of all parties actions I feel like I'm actually learning.
He's pretty much heavy on the side of the defense. Plus he goes into waaaay too much detail. Over analyses the petty stuff. I was a fan, until I wasn’t.
If you aren’t a fan go watch someone else. Maybe there’s some validity to his alibi. I’m not on the innocent band wagon but innocent until proven guilty
Fun fact! This park he claims he was at it is literally in the middle of nowhere on the snake river. It does not have cell reception. There'sno placeto really "hike". The view of the sky is somewhat limited to view as its in a canyon. Just outside of Pullman is the best to star gaze as it is open rolling hills wheat feilds. Also, it was overcast that night and freezing fog in the area. Coming from a local of the area.
Dinky-IMO channel. Video of drive from Pullman to park, entering park, picture of *BIG BRIGHT MOON* from within park… on a hiking trail. Also fun fact: person doing video from there. Sign states *”locked from dusk til dawn.”* … *Gate Was Not Locked.*
@@pyratellamarecordingstudio1062 when you Google earth map the park and then use the little *”walk”* feature (not sure if your familiar) it places you right on a canyon, and all you see is openness…. If you check out that channel from my comment above, someone remote drove there, entered and then took pictures from inside 🤷♀️, this was like a week ago
@@LiLHarOak my point is what if he didn’t go to the park, but went near it where he could see the stars. Since the person was local I was asking them. Too lazy to do google maps, plus they don’t know about local side roads etc
The burden is on the state to prove a defendant's guilt, not for the defendant to prove his innocence. Why must a defendant prove he was at a *specific* location when proof that he wasn't at the crime scene sufficient? The fact that *no* DNA evidence was found in his vehicle for such a gruesome crime tells me he's innocent. And that's before considering the Brady issues.
…because there is a statute that if they are planning to argue alibi they have to give it to the state. They don’t have to present an alibi. But they are saying that they have an alibi and some proof of the alibi and anticipate more and aren’t providing it so the state is annoyed.
BK did not need to claim to have an alibi at all if he planned on showing via telemetry data he wasn't there. Telemetry data is not an alibi. The state is just pointing out that this alibi defense isn't an ALIBI at all and if they're going to call it an alibi it needs to be treated like one. BK always had the option to just present the telemetry data at trial - a lot of people are by themselves with no corroborating witnesses at night, it's not like that particular part is weird.
He also was seen cleaning his car…covers, change of clothes, easy when you know how not to leave evidence around. He also cleaned the car at his parents….if so innocent why would you wear gloves INSIDE your parents home, and walk a huge block to put your own rubbish in their bin, in the middle of the night, rather strange to me, no amount of any OCD explains that. IMO. That seems very excessive for someone pleading “innocent”
It always concerns me how you prove you weren’t somewhere. I’m a single parent, from 8pm I’m home alone and my child is asleep. I’d never have an alibi if someone accused me of something after dark, it’s a scary prospect to have to prove you weren’t somewhere
One perk of having a security system with cameras in my house AND getting up to use the bathroom ALOT plus insomnia and nighttime munchies is that I am on video at night even if I am alone 😂
This channel has slowly creeped to my all time favorite channel. I really love your style, humbleness, and most importantly, integrity. What a super great way to share your brain with us.
@@sallycinnamon5370 They filed it separately. COMES NOW, Bryan C. Kohberger, by and through his attorneys of record, and hereby moves this Court to unseal the IGG materials sealed by this Courts Order signed on 12/29/23, except for the individuals on the family tree or found via the IGG, on the grounds that this information should be made public and does not meet the requirements for sealing under I.C.A.R. 32.
Didn’t the alibi hint that there is or should be GPS data, either from the phone or a cloud service? Wasn’t there something about the state potentially hiding or destroying exculpatory GPS data? Could this be why they are now scrambling and trying to limit what can come in?
The state is bitching that the defense still hasnt given up all their discovery for the alibi. Yet the state still hasnt given up everything they are supposed to give to the defense. Until the state gives over 100% of the discovery they are supposed to without playing any games, then the defendant should receive a directed verdict of not guilty. The prosecutor should go to jail for violating his rights.
@pearlygates_city to that I say: You heard JJJ today, he is going to sign the *SUBPOENAS FOR THE FBI* so that the Defense can fikkking FINALLY get all of discovery,
It seems like important key evidence has not been provided. The things they used to arrest him over a year ago. The excuse that the state hasn't gotten it from the fbi yet is getting old.
“We’ve got the state in a blender.” I love your commentary, Peter. I still think they are going to show cell phone data showing he drove out this route where service was sketchy habitually at these same hours. If they pull pictures from his phone with time stamps during the time his phone wasn’t pinging showing landmarks from the park it could cause reasonable doubt. Maybe this isn’t a solid alibi, but it does seem plausible.
The problem with that is that the cellphone goes off network in the middle of town and doesn’t seem to go off and on network like it usually does when you drive through spotty reception. It’s off solid from middle of town until he is south of Moscow after the murders. Interesting that the alibi is that he is far southwest of his house when his phone picks up far south east of his house. I don’t think that pinging that far is possible.
It's not reasonable doubt it is solid proof. And if that exists they should have seen that and thrown the case out a long time ago and the fact they didn't shows something very rotten is going on.
@@LTPottenger What proof have you seen of Brian being east of Pullman other than vague insinuation. Nothing in the alibi was specific like the assertions in the PCA. I don’t trust them a bit. If they don’t say it outright it is for a reason…likely that to put something false in an affidavit could mean sanctions
@sallycinnamon5370 have you ever driven in mountainous areas with poor coverage? I have. I work in such an area. I can get from the mountains on one side of town, into the mountains on the other side of town (more than 20 miles away) without once having my cellphone connect to a tower because the signal doesn't reach the bottom of many of the canyons around here. I wouldn't be hard to convince that his cellphone was on but not hitting towers if they can show he was using it for other apps during those hours.
If Kohberger has a viable, or legitimate, alibi, and can provide it, let him do so. In my opinion, if he claims to have an alibi, that alibi must comply with the requirements of the Idaho code in question.
SO MY Q: is if BK and the defence "has" to produce for them all their guts and glory....why isn't it demanded of the PROSECUTOR as well, just to continue to hold him there...? The prosecution HAS AN OBLIGATION TO THE COURT AND THE PERSON THEY PUT INTO CUSTODY AND HIS LAWYER..... TO SHOW THIER CARDS !!!! ... You can't justifiably and honorably keep a victim in custody and play head games and dance the hokey pokey & do the electric slide while you have that person in custody ... That's not JUSTICE! SHOW YER DAMN CARDS.... IF YOU HAVE THIS ACE .. AND ITS A IN THE WHOLE BIRDIE ON FATHERS DAY... then put them babies down to China Town Down ...or PAHLEEASE! Let the defence rest thier case and free the man! blank or get off the blank blank pot!
@@chopnthegrass -- Please allow me to propose my own scenario: I'm arrested and accused of killing four people -- four murders that I know I did not commit. Since I'm not made of money, the State provides me a defense attorney -- which, by law, I am entitled to have. Do you know what I would work on with my lawyer before the ink has the chance to dry on all that official paperwork? My lawyer and I would present my alibi to prove my innocence. Immediately. It's that simple. There would be no game-playing, no prolonging what should be done, no nonsense. If I'm innocent, I want to make damned sure that I offer proof of my innocence and non-involvement in the crimes I'm suspected, or accused, of having committed before I'm carted off to jail like a bag of potatoes. I wouldn't let the State compromise my freedom; neither would I prolong my agony by withholding my alibi, or the agony of the victims' families or of my own.
Further (alleged) CAST REPORT ISSUES: The defense claims that there is data from BK’s previous visits to the park that will corroborate his frequent visits there. Which therefore tells us that his phone usually has no problem getting service in that area. Which therefore also then tells us that he must have turned his phone off, switched it into airplane mode, or that his phone was “conveniently” dead, however only for a few hours on the night of the crimes, but “conveniently” was then back on before he returned to his residence. Also, BK’s phone went off the network when he was in Pullman, a highly serviced area. The defense allege they have photos from other nights but not the night of the murders. Why none from the night in question? And let’s not ignore the fact that his DNA ended up at a crime scene, inside a house he’s never been in, on a knife sheath next to the victims and DNA does not = Does Not Apply
I'm assuming he's going to say yes, it was a cloudy night, so I didn't bother taking pictures of anything at the park or anywhere else. But you bring up a very good point with his phone inexplicably going off network before he really left the area of Pullman. And then if they have such a solid placement of his cell on prior nights when he's out visiting the park, why would that night of all nights be the one it's the spottiest on? (And this is based on the assumption he's going to claim he didn't turn the phone off...) I kindve wonder if he's just going to play dumb and say 'I don't know, don't remember if it died or if I plugged it in. Wasn't going to take pictures that night so I don't really remember...' I'm confused as to why his car can't give a GPS location when the phone is off. I thought most cars could by now but i guess that's not true.
If it's phone gps data that is different from the phone poling the towers. The state has only said that the phone stopped talking to the towers. Which is what would happen if you're in a dead zone. The GPS data on the phone would still work and the phone would still record that it is receiving positional data from the SATELLITES. Weird that the state is refusing to turn over the phones GPS data.
@@Tinmann_77 My understanding is they are not refusing as per the hearing yesterday but are awaiting a cast report from the FBI. Interesting why the prosecution keep breaking the court rules and can’t get a valid alibi together after a year or so and just keep loving to delay the trial.
Thank you for being fair and putting justice first. Call me innocent, but it seems as if Billy only cares about winning. I understand that, who doesn't want to win? When it is such a huge reason for the truth to be honored, though, the prosecutor's pride should come from standing up for truth . This is a matter of justice for a citizen in the United States, not just a man's pride in Moscow. I also understand that putting your good name above a man's life is not uncommon in the court system. I pray that the true and correct outcome will prevail in this case.
In addition, the victim's & their families also deserve justice in having the right person (or people) punished. What an additional tragedy it would be to later discover they wrongly convicted BK & the families have to go through another trial.
The ones who only cares about winning are the killer and his cronies! He's in jail for a reason and if he was so innocent that you believe he is then he wouldn't be locked up.
Exactly. It shouldn't matter what BK claims because the state can PROVE different- which is their job. Jack & other's albis were they were home sleeping alone. No one can necessarily prove that true. The state has the burden of proof not the other way around. Its the state that has continuously failed to turn over discovery & keeps forcing the defense to file motions to compel...and they still haven't done so.
@@shelldeluca i thought the state said 5 times he turned over everything and the judge asked him can you just check to make sure and he said yeah he will check ..
@@prissypacheco2860there have been 14 motions to compel the state, all of which the defense won. There is still stuff that the state says they'll provide "when it's available" or that they say they can't provide because a different agency has it. The prosecutor is a liar with a weak case.
Thanks Peter watching the replay in the uk love how you just break it down it’s the most crazy case for sure on both sides , I’m still waiting to see what they come up with in court
There is a chance that the defenses expert will testify about the GPS on his phone or pictures on his phone. The thing people forget is that electronic forensics is BKs specialty . He knows exactly what is on his phone and how to access it. This is just 😢 my opinion as someone who has followed this case very closely through court documents and his application to work with the police department, University.
Good point. The state probably fears that it cannot prove the time of the crime specifically enough, so they want BK to commit to a location and time first. Conversely, if the defense can show that the time of the murders overlapped with the time the elantra was seen in the surveillance footage (which is time-stamped), then the prosecution must admit that the elantra wasn't BK's, making BK's claim that he was in the park or elsewhere more credible. After all, the white elantra in the footage was the catalyst for suspecting BK in the first place.
I think they are annoyed because the alibi is supposed to be provided with the evidence to support it so it isn’t trial by ambush. I think they should have way more time to provide the support since they haven’t even gotten full discovery yet.
@@The80sKidRox well i will disagree, the state is the one on the heals wanting his alibi, if their case is so good his alibi wouldnt matter. when he walks free you will know ;)
Because the tech as in GPS wasn't forthcoming. Now someone has analyzed it and can prove almost to the yard/foot? where he was during the crimes; and during that timeline of 26+- minutes the prosecutor has to maintain in which they occurred, might be a guess? If there aren't any people who saw him gazing at the stars, that's all he's got, then it's up to the State to refute whatever is provided in his defense by an equally qualified tech expert, let the chips fall where they may and the jury's opinion of them. The prosecutor is fearing he (or any expert he can come up with to rebut the defense's expert ) won't be able to do it apparently. His argument, his references seem desperate to me, in a DP case allowances have to be made by the judge I would imagine, and WT may have to suck this one, too. But not w/o the judge saying something cautionary to, or reprimanding AT.
@willbeard4835 for him to be framed you have to believe the police show up to scene and know they can’t solve it and that it would economically destroy the community so they plant a random grad students dna from their dna framing bank on the sheath. And then hope and pray that that persons activity’s last night from another state match up close enough to be a suspect
Huh? My service is A one! Even when local internet is down, ATT comes through. Location, I guess matters? Even in Canada, it moved seamlessly to Rogers, I can't remember exactly server name, to a Canadian server.
@@shanacamacho79 “The technique has been criticized for high rates of false positives due to contamination-for example, fingerprint brushes used by crime scene investigators can transfer trace amounts of skin cells from one surface to another, leading to inaccurate results.[4][5]” *wiki
Prosecutor is desperate for a conviction, and for it to be an "outsider". Don't think they care if they have the right guy. Which they may...or may not.
State: "Your Honor, the State intends to seek the death penalty in this case, but we really need to know more specifics about the defendant's alibi." Is the prosecutor so dumb that he doesn't realize how dumb he looks and sounds? This guy must have been absent the day they taught law at Law School.
He's not nervous because so far Kohberger can't come up with an alibi. He can't be specific. And the reason why he can't be specific is he knows the state has all of the information proving him wrong.
@@KayInMaine And why doesn't the state give him that information, namely the cast he asked for many times? Let me do as you did, that is, let me guess: Kohberger doesn't give the complete alibi until the state gives him the information he asked for, because just as the state thinks that Kohberger could fabricate an alibi, Kohberger also has the right to think that by giving the complete alibi the state could change the missing information.
Since I've been to that park before, and it's basically opposite direction of Moscow from Pullman, the cell coverage out in the middle of nowhere is pretty garbage. Also by that point in the day your cell phone could be dead if it hadn't been charged
I think Ann Taylor is playing games. If they are depending on phone pings but then say we will provide them at a later date, then do they really have any phone data? If they say they have it why can't they provide it now? Why do they keep stalling? I don't blame the State for being annoyed. I believe in Koberger getting a fair trial but his alibi is weak imo. I also am not sure about Judge Judge. Because this is a death penalty case, televised no less, he seems extremely lenient with Taylor, maybe in fear of making a mistake? I don't know but even when JJ is angry Taylor has a way of talking right over him and it seems she does it to get her own way i.e. moving the trial. He told her 4 times it was too soon to even think about moving it and she kept pounding on JJ that no, her way was the only way. An aggressive defense and a scared Judge sometimes feels like role reversal when listening to them. There has to be a reason why she says "will provide more info in the future re the alibi". It just feels like a game to me but I am not a lawyer. What is she hoping is going to pop up "in the future" that will strengthen the alibi? Does the State even know that the parks Koberger says he was in is locked up at night? How could he have been in the park looking at stars when there are gates? I have questions.
The geodata and the phone payments are two different things right you're going to Ping off a cell tower if you stop at a red light and make a text that doesn't mean, that you stopped anywhere along the way from point A to point b. But you're going to pay off a tower. Where are you are via a satellite is different than where you are via a ping on a cell phone tower. That's how I'm understanding it and that's how my husband who was an electronics engineer worked for T-Mobile and Sprint before he just passed explained it. Anyway who knows at this point. All I know is whoever did this if it wasn't BK they didn't need to be in a car, they clearly wouldn't have had their phones and I do remember the next morning a picture of the computer through the window that said the internet or the Wi-Fi or something was not available it would be interesting to see if BK phone picked up onto anybody's Wi-Fi rather than a cell phone ping. If you go on Google Earth it'll tell you the exact coordinates of your house or where you are etcetera. But if you make a phone call right now it's not going to tell you the exact coordinates of where you are depending on where you ping from, that's how I'm understanding it I don't know maybe I read your question wrong LOL😊
Try reading the actual Alibi again! I've heard so many people say all the same things that this comment says and I just have two words🙄 Reading Comprehension! They are about to have a hearing on the very issue of the state NOT turning over the very evidence that the state is obviously withholding (or has done away with) that is NEEDED! to prove his alibi.. prove where he actually was, not where they are saying he was. Do you understand the conundrum? When someone who's holding your phone and data, and demanding that you prove where you were but will not turn over the thing, really the ONLY thing that WILL prove it.
This trial is a complete joke. Only the Read and Delphi cases can compare to the endless nonsense from the prosecutor. If he's guilty they should have slammed the case closed a year ago.
“This trial is a complete joke” What trial?? The trial is at least 18 months out. Plus, you don’t know anything about any evidence from the prosecutor or the defense because of the gag order. You’ve been listening to fairy stories from channel operators looking for money. “Only the Read and Delphi case can compare” Read has only just begun and Delphi is a long way away. So you’re comparing non existent trials to a non existent trial. 😂 Stop sucking up RUclips nonsense like a sponge. Peter is a real attorney. Other channels just make stuff up so that vulnerable people will join and pay money to them. Be careful who you listen to and be more careful about what you believe.
@@enigma_-_79 Are you on his staff on on green's? Very nice pedantism. If you don't know anything it shows you never paid attention. We have PCA and all the details. Just not the names. And the news keeps pushing LIES that he was fired and it's revenge, that he stalked maddy, and on and on. Plus they lied at the beginning saying it was a crime of passion. Lied and said no one was in danger. The police report to the corrupt university president who has business dealings with the convicted r-pist who owns the house. Which is constantly sold back and forth between shell companies. No reason for that but money laundering or more likely for far worse reasons. The police on the scene are corrupt cops with legal violations pending from other cases. They get their pay directly from the university who is having campus police investigate a crime not even on campus. A university is a billion dollar corporation. Imagine the outcry if mc donalds were running a murder investigation lol This would be totally illegal in most states, idaho is a joke. Yet I see constant people with zero subs or content like you that show up just for this case and this one alone. I wonder why, probably many LE and university shills.
The prosecution has a legitimate point. It has 10 days after receiving BK's alibi notice to tell the defense what witnesses it will use to rebut the testimony of the defendant's alibi witnesses. The prosecution doesn't want to be surprised and needs to object now.
Can u please tell me why it’s ok to hold on to the important video and clip it up? Isn’t this illegal? Do they allegedly want details to make the CAST report off that?
I'm confused here.. How can " the stars' be a witness in the 1st place.. 2nd: How could he 'watch the stars' while it is completely cloudy? They are constantly looking deep for building blocks to prevent for the trial to take place and everybody (must??) falls for it.🤔🤨.
I don’t think that the prosecution is asking for a “legitimate” alibi because of lack of evidence. Their asking it be according to Idaho law. Why should BK be treated differently? He’s not above the law. IMO he’s been given many resources. AT and team appear to be playing games, making it up as they go along. I just don’t see anyone sitting in jail if they have a credible alibi.
Amazingly real... Belmoon... Is that if they get your tooche in custody for just about anything... Right or wrong as they may be.... You can stay there unfortunately until the LAW THAT SURROUNDS YOUR WHOLE IN " DIS" CUSTODY reason is abolished in the court of law....usually takes a SUMMA CUM LAUDE LAWYER!! It sucks big.. but if they succeed IN Getting you in their custody for whatever reason.. LIKE (trains planes and automobiles" YOUR F----d!
In the state of Idaho, they violate defendants and their 2nd and 6th ammendant rights, the ACLU is suing the state of Idaho, because of the people who can not post bail to get out, because they have no money, that is kolhberger, don't be so quick to think that the state is so honest, look up (.Tuckervs.Idaho) very eye-opening about the state of Idaho and how they treat anyone with no money, or anyone who has been accused of a criminal crime? That is why he stayed in jail he could not afford bail! When you have money it is different. Until you are v in that situtation you can't understand!
Where does an "alibi" end and evidence begin? Cell phone records, etc evidence and expert analysis testimony seems more like evidence than an "alibi". Seems an alibi is more along the lines with the defendant/defense stating early on information that can prove the defendant didn't commit the crime. The evidence divulged during the trial isn't what I'd term a true "alibi".
Im sure at some point in those early morning hours BK was at the Wawawai Park. I bet data shows that. Im curious the hours because that just might very well be where the knife and any other evidence could have been discarded in the river. Speculating of course...Love how you break it all down to easily understand it, Peter! Great channel!
Or what I was thinking, what if the pings doesnt mean he was on the left of the map, but on the right side of the map. Im not describing it correctly..
Really, all that happned in that courtrrom on May 2nd was that of the prosecution reading a long list of caselaw, claimig it to be impermissible under law to give the defense council any information at all. The defense council stating that, all of the traffic and security videos, they have been given is only short clips with most of the audio removed, and the judge eventualy ruling that the prosecuton must turn-in a report on the videos on May 7. A whole day in court for that idiotic and useless ruling.
When it is hard for the state to disprove, or deprive, they do not want to accept the alibi, and that is why they do that , it is in Idaho laws? They are afraid that kolhberger has a good alibi. So they don't want to accept it!
@@A2G999I agree with you. I just happened to be driving around looking at the sky and the stars and the moon because I couldn't jog anymore. And then right around the time of the murders my phone stop tracking for some reason cuz of the area I was in and then right after the murders it started to pick up again.
@@A2G999The state is saying it's not specific enough because their rules require witnesses or a specific location. Saying "I was driving around between these hours in this area" IS an alibi. They've requested multiple times specific disclosure to use to prove it, which is why they have ANOTHER hearing on it on the 15th. The State can't even prove he was or wasn't, they say in their reply his phone wasn't reporting. By their OWN evidence the only thing they can really say is that at some point they believe he was in the house or a car, or cars, that looks like his was in the area. They're literally saying "well we can't track you to rule out you WEREN'T there so we can say you WERE. It's up to YOU to provide specifics as to how you weren't." If that's not an alibi, then it's not a case.
People all over the world are following this case. The prosecution and judge know everything they do is watched closely and any errors will be discussed by many RUclips viewers, including many attorneys.
The Idaho rule of alibi is different than many other states. Literally the only thing the defense added was BK going to that park and the viewing of the moon and stars. At this point I don't think the defense has come close to an alibi defense.
Yes, innocence project is a nonprofit group that goes around proving that the convicted person was actually innocent and the prosecutors fucked up or fabricated evidwnce
Exactly! If the state has so much proof then what’s the problem?! I know the defence does have to provide an alibi but the state has been pretty aggressive in their confidence of his guilt. IMO they’re not that confident.
I think the guy is guilty, but to bring a DP case against someone without having ALLLLL the proof they need to convict is not ok with me. In this day and age, nobody has an excuse to be dropping any balls. The fact that so many DA's are still attempting this is ANY case, much less a high profile one is just a little more than scary. But hubris is as hubris does. Having said that, I believe that a man like BK is just the sort of person that would slaughter 4 people and then try to get away with it using this alibi. He's risking his life. I'm betting on the house, but in the end, justice is only justice if it's done right.
re why BT wants to preclude experts' alibi testimony, and will only recognize BK's own testimony: experts can construct plausible technical theories, which is not proof of what actually happened, 'cause they can't know, but adds another brick of un/reasonable doubt. By AT putting it directly to JJ, she knows he will consider and rule vs just enforcing deadlines and moving the case along. Both AT and BT know JJ is the weak link in all these proceedings, the bar is getting lower, and the goalposts keep moving. AT is doing her job too well playing to JJ's weakness: his long-known inability to control his courtroom. Change of venue? Please throw in a new judge with it.
When he was first arrested I was thinking he was most likely guilty because he was arrested, but I didn't have the certainty that I have with Chad Daybell or Lori Vallow. The last few months I've moved more and more to the middle. Based on what we "know" from the media there's a lot of reasonable doubt. Unless the state has stronger evidence I'd vote not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt because right now I'm 50/50 on whether or not he did it. Which is upsetting, because if he didn't do it then the real killer is laughing his butt off and Brian should be free, and if he did do it he might get an acquittal and be the one laughing at the end.
Yes! Same! There's so much back and forth, and nothing clear and indisputable coming out from the state, yet being covered in MSM as if he has already been convicted. So many unanswered questions, from the survivors to the university's role in the case and house demolition, to the state not turning over discovery, the stalking allegations turning out to be false...definitely creates reasonable doubt, and that's all stuff the state has put out there! And the fact that no one else seems to have been investigated extensively or even considered. I also saw that the FBI broke protocol with the IGG process, which if true, does not look good on their end. (Cannot confirm since I am not a legal professional, but I heard it on truth and transparency, which thus far seems to be a pretty reputable source, who sticks to the court documents for her info) I'm in the middle of the road, maybe leaning towards him not being the one, or the only one, involved.
Based off what we know I think he’s guilty. The dna on the sheath is the biggest prove of evidence. I also don’t believe the defense when they say no other everyone has been found. Also the defense isn’t trying to explain the DNA away they are trying to throw it out because it is damning
@@genamar832justice isn't just convicting someone of the murders. It's convicting the murderer of having committed the murders. The longer the prosecution plays games the more it looks like they are framing him jist to get a conviction and make the case go away.
Even the judge refused to call this an alibi because it isn’t it’s laughable. If the state could probe Byran’s alibi why have they left him in jail all this time? The prosecution makes complete sense to me. Byran’s phone proves nothing the entire time the murders take place and his DNA is at the crime scene. This is login and common sense
That small amount of DNA isn't allowed by the Military, CIA or in other criminal cases. It's "touch" DNA as in a few cells, and partially intact ones. It's a huge problem for the prosecution as is how it got on the sheath, which wasn't ripped off the perp, but left at the scene intentionally.
DNA evidence can conclusively prove a wrongfully convicted person is actually innocent, but "Touch DNA" testing also may be causing false convictions and wrong results.
@@nomadscavenger I don’t believe it was left intentionally that was just a theory. And let me ask you this if you believe someone planted and tried to frame him then why is the amount of touch DNA so minimal? Surely the framer would have set Byran up better
Cell tower reporting is different from GPS data. Thats what the State is clearly not understanding. Just because they only understand the cell tower data, doesn't mean the GPS data doesn't exist for the time of the homicide. Thats exactly what the defense said it's in notice of Alibi.
I travel regularly 3 + hours to the city . I often lose cell tower coverage along the way but my GPS always accurately shows where I was and the route I travelled . In the city , there is always cell coverage , but when I receive my bill it shows either of two different towers for the same address . At my home , I always have reception with my provider but with guests who have a different provider they often will have none .
@@Pllm30 True but what's interesting in the defenses alibi response is that they say there is cell data missing from what the state has turned over. They say their expert is waiting for it and if it is not provided it is either because the state is withholding it or has destroyed it. What that tells me is that the expert has told them that there is missing data that will support his alibi that they have yet to receive from the state because the expert knows what data should exist. There is something we are missing here and it's hard to pinpoint exactly what it is but the defense seems to think they will be able to show he was elsewhere with some data from the cell phone and I think the state is nervous because they don't know what that data is. Who knows, maybe their expert isn't very good. Trust me, as a criminal lawyer I can tell you it has happened before. I have seen experts testify that are absolutely not experts but because lawyers are clueless about some of these things, they can't even tell how bad the expert is until it is too late.
@@erin5061 Closed , and the Defendant to be prevented from having any witness in his defence other than himself and no other evidence other than his words . BTroll wants their expert witness to be disallowed . Unbelievable!
It's a trap . The prosecution won't say when the time of the crime is. If BK says " I was exactly here, exactly when the crime happened" then prosecution will go "Aha, so you know when the crime was? Guilty!"
They can't. They are required to give everything to the defense before the trial starts. And if part of the reason they arrested him was because his phone pinged in the area at the time of the crime, they can't walk it back now.
@@ladywytch129so far the defense has won 14 motions to compel the state to turn over things that the state is required by law to turn over to the defense. The state still refuses to turn over everything to the defense? No, the state has not turned over what exact time they believe the murders took place, they've given something like a 6hr windows. How many places were you during a six hour windows on a given day? And actually no, his phone didn't ping near the murders on the date of the murder, it pinged within 1 mile of their house a day or two before the murders. Which is why the defense is fighting to get the cellphone data that the state won't turn over.
1. They have stated numerous times the murders took place between 4 and 4:25 except BT in thus last motion moved it to 4 and 4:30 2. Where did you see he pinged in Moscow a day prior?
"The prosecution won't say when the time of the crime is." That's the problem I have with it, too. If the prosecution is going to be vague about the time (4:00 - 4:30), the defense is going to be vague about the place.
Freezing outdoors, icy , snow on ground , and dark- hours after midnight & the park has no evidence he entered the park in hours not allowed & just drove around aimlessly is absurd . The car with one license plate was seen riding around king road -
You don't have to look at the weather that day, just look at the videos of the food truck and the footage of the police, the night was very clear and there was no ice at all.
UM Bill has the proof he's saying will Show that's where he was. why do people keep acting like they can just overlook that little detail? Its like your all going around your ass to get to your elbow, as they say
No, Kohlberger would have had to say he went to McDonald's first, and laid on top of his car to look at stars. I think the State is pissed off because the Defense lawyer did the survey without telling anyone, and with his current alibi, social media is saying basically, Did he NOT do it?.....He has an alibi?! To my view, that's poisoning the jury pool.
If I was one of the parents of any of the murdered children, I would be really upset if it turns out Brian is not guilty and the state has no leads on anyone else. I wish they would get a move on so we can see what evidence they really have.
That's right, @debbidunn639. The 1122 King Road house (the crime scene) should NEVER have been destroyed and buried until the guilty party/parties was/were both apprehended and proven to be guilty in court.
The Defense's objective in this trial (in any trial) is to defend their client,@@enigma_-_79, plain and simple -- not to preserve evidence for future potential investigations. The Prosecution, however, should have a broader, longer range objective -- that of brining justice to the case and prosecuting the correct suspect(s). Because of this, the State ought to always consider the possibility of needing to resurrect the investigation in case the presumed suspect is found to be innocent. The problem with this particular case is that the Prosecution is focused on "winning" rather than focused on bringing justice to the situation via finding and prosecuting the responsible perpetrator(s).
My reply to you is being repeatedly scrubbed,@@enigma_-_79, preventing me from explaining the delicate differences between the Defense's responsibilities and those of the State.
A cell phone can still record GPS data even when it loses connection to a cell tower. GPS signals are received directly from a network of satellites orbiting the Earth, and the connection to these satellites is independent of cellular network connectivity. Therefore, as long as your phone's GPS receiver is functional and has a clear view of the sky to receive satellite signals, it can still record GPS data even without a connection to a cell tower.
Yawn! I'm with the state. Defense is trying to delay, claiming a false alibi. Let's get on with this sh*t show. He's wasted way too much time and money in dragging this on for so long. But, if the state has the goods to put a fork in this, they should do it NOW. I'll be honest, this case is losing me, I'm not likely to follow it much longer.
A innocent defendant can't always say where they were at a certain time until they research it. They didn't know at the time that it would be important.
I don't understand how the state thinks they can compel the defendant to testify which is what this seems to me...the only person who can testify is the defendant?
@@BlackStump172why would they need data if he can just tell them where he was🤨 The state has the burden so if defense experts can disprove the states data, the defense shouldn’t NEED the data
BK has the RIGHT to see ALL evidence the state claims to have against him, a right to defend himself as well his right to have his own experts. It his life on the line. If the state is so confident in their findings, why do they keep refusing to turn over all discovery, the defense had to make multiple motions to compel. And really why does the state even care what BK says his albi is? Doesn't the state have undeniable PROOF he was at the crime scene at that specific time. It's their job to prove he is guilty, not BK's job to prove he's innocent.
@@shelldeluca And that's what they do. Defense just making up stories to make weak people think he's innocent while they've gotten everything that the state can give them.
Peter, you mentioned the data from Murdoch's GMC (a case I didn't follow). Isn't there supposed to be a Berla (Berler?) from BK's car? And wouldn't that be 99.9% incontrovertible?
Just my opinion, I think BK is making a mockery of the judicial system. His so-called alibi is a joke but no one is laughing, including the victims’ families. He has no one to substantiate his whereabouts. IMO he could have done this and his DNA proves he was there and he was seen by one of the roommates.
its hard to say your alibi when you as the defendant dont know all the details and times of the case. If the prosecution wants to know exactly where you were at 4:10am and they are saying you were at the house when the murders occurred then you need the prosecutions full discovery. He also needs to the CAST report in order to show where the prosecution might have missed something.
Cloud-based forensics was his area of specialty according to his job application. My understanding is that it's a different area, based more on cybersecurity, data, fraud and who owns data secured with a third party. "Pursuant to records provided by a member of the interview panel for Pullman Police Departnent we learned that Kohberger's past education included undergraduate degrees in psychology and cloud-based forensics. These records also showed Kohberger wrote an essay when he applied for an internship with the Pullman Police Department in the fall of 2022. Kohberger wrote in his essay he had interest in assisting rural law enforcement agencies with how to better collect and analyze technological data in public safety operations."
"Digital forensics is a branch of forensics that works with electronic devices and data to detect crimes, examine the paths of criminals, and analyze and preserve evidence for the use of law enforcement and prosecutors." "Cloud forensics can be considered a subset of digital forensics with a particular focus on cloud computing - and, thus, a subset of the broader sphere of forensic science. Many cloud forensic techniques and tools are therefore common in digital forensics."
@@dsmyyyth511 Touch DNA is utterly worthless, it's unrelable at best and in no way ties him to the scene as it could have got onto the shealth as much as 6 weeks prior to the murders. And that's even if it's allowed in as it could very well be fruit of the poisonous tree as it's pretty clear that the FBI broke the law to obtain the ties to BK's dad. I tell you what they don't have They don't have anything that ties him to the scene, no Blood, No fingerprints, no fibres from his clothes, no prints from his shoes, no murder weapon that is tied to him. They don't have anything that ties the scene to him, nothing from the scene in his car (that they admit wasn't cleaned) nothing from the scene in his house (That they admit wasn't cleaned), No evidence he had any connection to the victims, either in the real world or online. I've never seen a case so bereft of any evidence in my life, the prosecution is basically saying we can't put him at the scene or find anything from the scene because he's a genius killer with a degree on forensics but he also left a knife shealth in plain view with his DNA on it. You'd think it was far fetched if it were a Murder She Wrote episode. I think they were under so much pressure to find the killer that they found themselves a patsy, a guy with few friends who spent most of his time alone and was a bit wierd. It should never have got to the DA's office much less a trial.
Usually, people "star gaze" when there is some kind of celestial-astronomical event. Wonder if there was one on said alibi night? Would there be an expert on that? TY Peter for your insight! In gratitude, life is beautiful 💜
I mean…there is almost always something worth looking at for people with a passion. Venus or mars being close or another planet being visible. Or just spotting constellation
I go outside and sit on a swing or steps and star gaze every night when weather is good and the temp is nice. I get away from the noise of my kids and just get me time.
They already had wayyyy too much time to present the alibi! They shouldn't have had the opportunity to WAIT for anything right? That should've been one of the first things that was concluded?
There was a cut off date and it has passed for the alibi, stalling about alibi, means the state cannot do their justice and investigate like the weather, the road conditions, the gate being locked, if anyone else was in the park, so no this stalling by the defender is not right because then it’s what about the rights of the victims, I happen to have vaguely knew of them beautiful girls. The alibi matters in this case because he has always maintained he is innocent because he has an alibi. In the state of Idaho if that’s your defense you have to file it.
I wonder if what you perceive as stalling was actually the defense utilizing the time to find and hire Sy Ray and let him go over evidence for him to testify on BKs behalf about his alibi location? There just may not be the specific address or a specific witness that the prosecution needs to go investigate bc an exact address or witness doesnt exsist. Id hope the prosecution wouldnt need to have that info though bc they already have the evidence that proves without a reasonable doubt that he couldn't be anywhere else but at that house.
I didn't interpret this as the state being afraid of anything, I take it as the state seeing how BK's team is trying to get away with not adhering to Idaho code in order to provide more paperwork, have more hearings, etc., etc., in effort to further delay everything. To me, this read as a frustrated/annoyed person responding to what I consider something lacking substance and specificity. It also makes me wonder if the state is going to (try) to pull something out of the bag to prove this is a bunk alibi, and is waiting for them to say something more specific so they can respond with a "gotchya" moment-- I have so many thoughts and curiosities just related to the dynamic of and between the attorneys, haha, that's been the most interesting part for me thus far!
This is ridiculous. The judge needs to move this along and get to trial asap.
NO ONE wants that- not the State, not the Defense, especially not LE or the University! The delay is about buying time before the culpability of LE and the local judiciary in the unalivings. ruclips.net/video/N1BtnfYalD4/видео.html
@Annie497 What a coincidence! Were you also on the OJ jury?
I don't want to see the trial quickly, I want a judge who will require the prosecution to give the defense council ample information to allow defense council to prepare a defense. This judge takes a week to rule on putting a bar of soap in the men's room.
@@leonardbosinski540No dummy, all of the signs are pointing to the states case being garbage.
Whenever a case is heavily covered by the media, judges and DA’s tend to be a bit more dramatic, so that they can get some fame
Why are people saying that the state is worried, when they’re doing their job but when the defense files anything everyone says they’re doing their job? Both sides are doing their job
The state will not turn over discovery, is cherry-picking what’s “relevant” and is trying to bar the cell phone expert, NO they aren’t doing their job.
Like others, I have my criticisms of the prosecution. But I must admit that if my last case as a decades-long prosecutor in a small county was being scrutinized by the entire world, and all anyone outside of my county would remember me for is that I won or lost this case, I'd be fighting tooth and nail too.
I think it’s important to be fair to any defendant. I’m glad you’re offering that perspective. I guess we’ll see.
@2:48
(I live a few miles from here)
Wawawai is pronounced:
Wah-why-ee
🙏🏼
Which originates from ‘Wawawa’, which translates to “Council Grounds” for the Nez Perce and Palouse tribes.
Edit/addition: cell service can be pretty spotty out there.
The state has no right to deny Bryan his rights and if they have a slam dunk case why would they care obviously the state doesn't have what they say they do or why would they worry about what the defense uses this should be criminal for the state to try to deny Bryan a fair trial.
No you're wrong! The defense has 95% of the discovery and the other 5% is due in September of 2024 this year and the prosecution is waiting for a few of the agencies to get their final reports in, and once they get them, they will be handed over to the defense. It's the defense who is using these hearings like a trial. Let's not forget it was the defense who demanded a gag order.
my point exactky,
I think it’s more important that he gets a fair trial, and it doesn’t sound like they are being fair to me.
Hello y'all from Waco Texas. I retired in December and found this channel. I am addicted.
Congrats on your retirement! 🎉
Best channel! 😁Happy you found it 🥰
Welcome 🤗💞🇨🇦
I have been retired for 1 year now, and this court tv is great! I love Lawyer You Know!!
Welcome to the best unbiased channel on RUclips. Congratulations on retirement 🎉🎉🎉🎉
Congratulations on the retirement and hopefully you are living and enjoying your best life! 👍
How can they deny him rights to his defense when he has not gotten all discovery to be able to defend himself? How can you defend yourself when you don't know exactly what you are accused of exactly besides murder of course. Anyone can say anyone commited murder but you must provide why, when, where, how. And in that case he can then say well yes, that is wrong because I was here at so and so. Crooked court injustice systems at work here.
I'm 78 years old. Am I going to live long enough to see this case go to trial? It has certainly given me more to live for. I have had a very blessed life. I'm sorry these beautiful kids were robbed of the same. I think Ann Taylor is playing games to stall the case and it doesn't look good for the Defense.
It's good to be in America cause we all can express our opinions. THERE HAVE BEEN MANY CONVITIONS WITH A LOT LESS EVIDENCE THOUGHT.
The feds would not place their reputation on the line for any defendant including BK. It’s like BK is any more or less important than anyone else. The feds are notorious for dragging their feet in most cases. There a lot of conspiracy theories going around but the FBI doesn’t care if its’ BK or another suspect(Their coming after you).
Probable cause and it's legal as it has been done for many, many years. When DNA shows up from someone means it's PC. That does not mean guilty. I'm sure if my DNA showed up on an item up under neath a dead body, I would be hauled to jail.
Probable cause, and it's legal as it has been done for many, many years. They only have to report(To the defense) the connection and not 100% for an arrest. There is horrible communication and most of these things should have been on the table by now. I don't think that the state is hiding anything as there is a lack of control from the judge. The judge is not holding either side with 100% conviction. The prosecution would not put this entire case and their lively hoods for one defendant. When DNA shows up from someone means it's PC. That does not mean guilty. I'm sure if my DNA showed up on an item under neath a dead body, I would be hauled to jail.
Definition of Probable Cause - Probable cause means that a reasonable person would believe that a crime was in the process of being committed, had been committed, or was going to be committed. Legal Repercussions of Probable Cause - Probable cause is enough for a search or arrest warrant.
What is an example of a probable cause?
A good example of probable cause to search a property is the scenario of a drug house. Police may know (or at least highly suspect) that the property is used for selling drugs, and they want to obtain a warrant. To get a warrant, they will need to convince a judge a crime is being committed at the location
Exactly 💯 She combes thru state's evidence, put her "discusting filthy defendant" exactly where the states evidence say's he was AS A DEFENSE. 😡 Because she knows no one can pinpoint EXACT LOCATION - JUST APPROXIMATE! 😡😡 YOUR EXACTLY 💯 CORRECT ANN TAYLOR PLAYING GAMES - """"""BECAUSE THEY HAVEN'T A DEFENSE """" 😡
"Am I going to live long enough to see this case go to trial?" Well, if you are, you've got plenty of life left.
That’s right spot on she is trying to put doubt in everyone’s mind …
@@mrasic3507 "Because she knows no one can pinpoint EXACT LOCATION - JUST APPROXIMATE!"
If "no one" can prove BK's exact location when the murders occurred, maybe the state shouldn't have charged him.
I’m over all of the conjecture, I want the trial to start so I can see/hear the testimony with my own eyes.
Dont watch any of this stuff then what are you doing here 😂
lmao it's over a year out at minimum
Invite your ears too! 😅
Pullman, WA here!! “Wuh-Why-Eee” park, like many things in Whitman County, is a rural, isolated park on the steep breaks of the Snake River. I never have cell service when there or for about twenty minutes when traveling to and from. I think this will be their argument…
Thx for the locals’ perspective!
@@Vegas_Mel That's why the judge will probably not change venue. Local jurors will know relevant nuances.
“ I was somewhere else” is not an alibi.
Enigma... If I asked you for an alibi for where you were a month ago at 4a.m.. Could you??
Agree, but defense will need to refute any evidence that shows he was traveling to Moscow just before murders. AT claims the white car in a video shown driving past Floyd's can't be Kohberger since he was elsewhere. I think she's trying to put the burden on BT to prove he wasn't in Moscow, and that's a problem BT has because he may only have cell pings that are from a tower that covers several mile radius.
It’s making me look forward to the trial, because I want to see what the state has.
clearly nothing by the look of it. the state is very scared at every steps
@@AlejandrMartínez-g4d trial? 15% chance it ever gets to a trial with Cleanberger involved.
Nothin' from nothin' is nothin'. They gotta' have somethin' if they want me to believe.
@@AlejandrMartínez-g4d We probably only know 1% of the evidence that they have on him. We won’t know until the trial. They release the bare minimum to the public in the probable cause just to feed us something, anything. We won’t find out anything more until that trial begins, which it seems won’t start until at least 2025, probably 26. That’s not fair to the victims or their families.
We may never know what the state does and does not have. It may not be televised, the news industry does a horribly bad job of noting and reporting details, and Freedom of Informaion Act requests may take more than seventy years to get anything worthwhile.
Thanks Peter for breaking this all down for us. This trial will be a long wait.
If the State has the evidence to prove him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt the alibi shouldn’t really matter.
lmao you’re clueless
They have the right to know so they can do an investigation into where he was, receipts, cameras, and whatever else would prove his alibi, where he was.
A true alibi is everything.
That's the strangest thing I have ever heard, Natalie. Are you sure you understand the significance of an alibi to someone who is accused of committing murder?
@@melstiller8561
If he really did have an iron-clad alibi, wouldn’t he have said so 18 months ago instead of sitting in a jail cell?
This is NOT one of the best YT channels on true crime out there, this is the BEST in accurate and in depth explanation on the documents and motions in cases like the Idaho 4, Murdaugh, Karen Reed from a real Cali grown lawyer
May I ask.. do you know how the state figured out it was KB's father? I know they went thru his trash, but how did they know it was him in the first place?
@@prissypacheco2860dna on the knife sheath left at the scene.
@@marymackxo maybe I should rephrase that. I know what you said, but how did they figure out it was the father? Did he provide his dna to a lab a long time ago checking his family tree?
Or how did they get the dads dna?
And i know they got it in the trash but what lead them to bk's fathers trash can?
Finally (not working and) caught a LIVE!! Signed, devoted member of the replay crew.
How can the State use electronic location in their PCA and not allow the defense to use it to counter the PCA. It is allowed in Idaho in the Daybell trials.
I kinda feel that the state doesn't have any solid evidence, they seem worried and hung up on the alibi🤔
Perhaps, the Prosecution are getting really nervous. With this alibi coming to light..IF the Defense is onto something & the expert is going to be a Defense witness. I would think he's sure about his findings. Because, it's his reputation on the line.
That's what I'm thinking. This expert has been on 24Hr., Dateline, True Crime & others I can't remember. He usually is a witness for the Prosecutor. First time for the Defense. I think the Prosecutor are really nervous now. I hope the true murderers should be too. DM & maybe BF, I can just image how they feel.
@@Dee-wd8lilook at the "experts" AH hired in the Depp case. Money can get people to say anything. But I agree the expert probably has something the state is worried about because the state knows they are setting BK up.
@@Dee-wd8liit’s speculated that Sy Re was at the scene of the crime with Anne Taylor along with the FBI as the defense expert. What if he was there to investigate and now he’s a defense witness 🤔
🤣 The defense has no alibi. Driving around is not an alibi without video or witness statements. If I was sitting in jail and had a solid alibi, you bet your boots I would provide it. Why wouldn’t you? The defense has no alibi and the prosecution knows this and trying to enforce the laws on the books. If you allow this then the next defendant could say anything like I was laying in bed watching movies without any corroborating evidence to prove it.
I think both sides are behaving in a peculiar manner
Agreed. Anne Taylor agreeing to both the gag order and the destruction of the crime scene was very odd
I think these things seem peculiar to us but they are normal to them (judicial system)
you are seeing 'secret society' Freemasonry, the devil and his puppets just don't act right...
@@willbeard4835maybe she had everything she needed from the house, so she agreed to the destruction. Remember when the prosecution, and defense, along with the FBI went to visit the house one last time? Guess who was part of the defense expert, Sy Re the defense expert to testify about BK’s alibi.
@@theboujieliberian i hope so. Even if the jury just looked at the house from the outside they would be able to recognize 4 people could not be stabbed to death and the surviving two roommates didn't hear it
I can't believe how slow this process is.
I asked the exact same questions …. Totally agree with Peter
Looking forward to tonight’s live! i’ve been following this case from day one
Peter, I love how you present your analysis in as much of an unbiased way as you can! You really promote critical thinking of all parties actions
I feel like I'm actually learning.
He's pretty much heavy on the side of the defense. Plus he goes into waaaay too much detail. Over analyses the petty stuff. I was a fan, until I wasn’t.
If you aren’t a fan go watch someone else. Maybe there’s some validity to his alibi. I’m not on the innocent band wagon but innocent until proven guilty
❤me too learning so much !
@@crystalship9900100%.
@@shaycase1834 Yeah, right, I already unsub bed from his biased reportage 👍🏻👍🏻
Fun fact! This park he claims he was at it is literally in the middle of nowhere on the snake river. It does not have cell reception. There'sno placeto really "hike". The view of the sky is somewhat limited to view as its in a canyon. Just outside of Pullman is the best to star gaze as it is open rolling hills wheat feilds. Also, it was overcast that night and freezing fog in the area.
Coming from a local of the area.
Dinky-IMO channel. Video of drive from Pullman to park, entering park, picture of *BIG BRIGHT MOON* from within park… on a hiking trail.
Also fun fact: person doing video from there. Sign states *”locked from dusk til dawn.”* … *Gate Was Not Locked.*
Is there a place close to the park that is on top of the canyon?
@@pyratellamarecordingstudio1062 when you Google earth map the park and then use the little *”walk”* feature (not sure if your familiar) it places you right on a canyon, and all you see is openness…. If you check out that channel from my comment above, someone remote drove there, entered and then took pictures from inside 🤷♀️, this was like a week ago
@@LiLHarOak my point is what if he didn’t go to the park, but went near it where he could see the stars. Since the person was local I was asking them. Too lazy to do google maps, plus they don’t know about local side roads etc
@@pyratellamarecordingstudio1062 sorry
The burden is on the state to prove a defendant's guilt, not for the defendant to prove his innocence. Why must a defendant prove he was at a *specific* location when proof that he wasn't at the crime scene sufficient? The fact that *no* DNA evidence was found in his vehicle for such a gruesome crime tells me he's innocent. And that's before considering the Brady issues.
…because there is a statute that if they are planning to argue alibi they have to give it to the state.
They don’t have to present an alibi. But they are saying that they have an alibi and some proof of the alibi and anticipate more and aren’t providing it so the state is annoyed.
Alibi is an affirmative defense, meaning the defendant has the burden of proof on that defense if intends to use it. Similar to self-defense.
BK did not need to claim to have an alibi at all if he planned on showing via telemetry data he wasn't there. Telemetry data is not an alibi. The state is just pointing out that this alibi defense isn't an ALIBI at all and if they're going to call it an alibi it needs to be treated like one. BK always had the option to just present the telemetry data at trial - a lot of people are by themselves with no corroborating witnesses at night, it's not like that particular part is weird.
He also was seen cleaning his car…covers, change of clothes, easy when you know how not to leave evidence around. He also cleaned the car at his parents….if so innocent why would you wear gloves INSIDE your parents home, and walk a huge block to put your own rubbish in their bin, in the middle of the night, rather strange to me, no amount of any OCD explains that. IMO. That seems very excessive for someone pleading “innocent”
@@shaz8486 The States own evidence disproves that, the State said that his car had not been cleaned.
It always concerns me how you prove you weren’t somewhere. I’m a single parent, from 8pm I’m home alone and my child is asleep. I’d never have an alibi if someone accused me of something after dark, it’s a scary prospect to have to prove you weren’t somewhere
No one is accusing you of anything. Bryan's DNA was found at a crime scene. Unless your DNA is left at a crime scene, I wouldn't worry about it.
Your phone would show you were home
Then there shouldn't be videos showing you were out driving around the crime scene.
One perk of having a security system with cameras in my house AND getting up to use the bathroom ALOT plus insomnia and nighttime munchies is that I am on video at night even if I am alone 😂
@@kristenpino4635yes and there aren’t any
This channel has slowly creeped to my all time favorite channel. I really love your style, humbleness, and most importantly, integrity.
What a super great way to share your brain with us.
Weird AF comment daddy
You're so passionate about this tonight. I love it! Keeping me interested and learning. TY
Hours earlier the defense filed paperwork demanding to have all IGG evidence unsealed and court hearings to be public. BT is a little upset IMO.😮
They didn’t ask for the IGG data to be unsealed. Just shared with all their investigators if they wanted.
@@sallycinnamon5370 They filed it separately.
COMES NOW, Bryan C. Kohberger, by and through his attorneys of record, and hereby
moves this Court to unseal the IGG materials sealed by this Courts Order signed on 12/29/23,
except for the individuals on the family tree or found via the IGG, on the grounds that this
information should be made public and does not meet the requirements for sealing under
I.C.A.R. 32.
@@sallycinnamon5370 you might want to read AT docs dropped around 11am the same day.😄
Mr Thompson has been upset since he featured in the defense experts slide show. 😂
The state is cooperative only after being forced to by defense motions to compel. What are we up to, 15 motions to compel? How many deadlines missed?
Didn’t the alibi hint that there is or should be GPS data, either from the phone or a cloud service? Wasn’t there something about the state potentially hiding or destroying exculpatory GPS data? Could this be why they are now scrambling and trying to limit what can come in?
☝
This is possible. AT couldn't say as a matter of fact there was because they wont give it to her but maybe BK knows there would be.
A defendant doesn’t have to PROVE their innocence-the State has to PROVE his GUILT! This all reeks like a toilet trout.
No but if the defense uses an alibi defense that needs to be proven.
A defendant doesn’t have to provide an alibi in this case he has so he must follow those rules
I totally believe that Bryan Kohberger is innocent! It was reported last week that he was not stalking these girls and had no connection to them!!
Let's deny dna, shall we?
Let's deny cell phone info, car, his "poll"... shall we?
The state is bitching that the defense still hasnt given up all their discovery for the alibi.
Yet the state still hasnt given up everything they are supposed to give to the defense.
Until the state gives over 100% of the discovery they are supposed to without playing any games, then the defendant should receive a directed verdict of not guilty. The prosecutor should go to jail for violating his rights.
@pearlygates_city key words "ALMOST everything"
Such as?
@pearlygates_city to that I say: You heard JJJ today, he is going to sign the *SUBPOENAS FOR THE FBI* so that the Defense can fikkking FINALLY get all of discovery,
It seems like important key evidence has not been provided. The things they used to arrest him over a year ago. The excuse that the state hasn't gotten it from the fbi yet is getting old.
Peter thanks for always explaining things both ways and not being bias.
“We’ve got the state in a blender.” I love your commentary, Peter. I still think they are going to show cell phone data showing he drove out this route where service was sketchy habitually at these same hours. If they pull pictures from his phone with time stamps during the time his phone wasn’t pinging showing landmarks from the park it could cause reasonable doubt. Maybe this isn’t a solid alibi, but it does seem plausible.
The problem with that is that the cellphone goes off network in the middle of town and doesn’t seem to go off and on network like it usually does when you drive through spotty reception. It’s off solid from middle of town until he is south of Moscow after the murders.
Interesting that the alibi is that he is far southwest of his house when his phone picks up far south east of his house. I don’t think that pinging that far is possible.
It's not reasonable doubt it is solid proof. And if that exists they should have seen that and thrown the case out a long time ago and the fact they didn't shows something very rotten is going on.
@@LTPottenger What proof have you seen of Brian being east of Pullman other than vague insinuation. Nothing in the alibi was specific like the assertions in the PCA. I don’t trust them a bit. If they don’t say it outright it is for a reason…likely that to put something false in an affidavit could mean sanctions
@@sallycinnamon5370 The courtroom is where things are proven. Unless you can't even show the evidence due to a cowardly and corrupt court.
@sallycinnamon5370 have you ever driven in mountainous areas with poor coverage?
I have.
I work in such an area. I can get from the mountains on one side of town, into the mountains on the other side of town (more than 20 miles away) without once having my cellphone connect to a tower because the signal doesn't reach the bottom of many of the canyons around here. I wouldn't be hard to convince that his cellphone was on but not hitting towers if they can show he was using it for other apps during those hours.
If Kohberger has a viable, or legitimate, alibi, and can provide it, let him do so. In my opinion, if he claims to have an alibi, that alibi must comply with the requirements of the Idaho code in question.
That provision is Idaho Code 19-519.
SO MY Q: is if BK and the defence "has" to produce for them all their guts and glory....why isn't it demanded of the PROSECUTOR as well,
just to continue to hold him there...?
The prosecution HAS AN OBLIGATION TO THE COURT AND THE PERSON THEY PUT INTO CUSTODY AND HIS LAWYER..... TO SHOW THIER CARDS !!!! ... You can't justifiably and honorably keep a victim in custody and play head games and dance the hokey pokey & do the electric slide while you have that person in custody ... That's not JUSTICE! SHOW YER DAMN CARDS.... IF YOU HAVE THIS ACE .. AND ITS A IN THE WHOLE BIRDIE ON FATHERS DAY... then put them babies down to China Town Down ...or PAHLEEASE!
Let the defence rest thier case and free the man! blank or get off the blank blank pot!
@@chopnthegrass He's in jail because he have no witnesses or proof of being anywhere else, how hard can that be to grasp?
@@chopnthegrass --
Please allow me to propose my own scenario: I'm arrested and accused of killing four people -- four murders that I know I did not commit. Since I'm not made of money, the State provides me a defense attorney -- which, by law, I am entitled to have. Do you know what I would work on with my lawyer before the ink has the chance to dry on all that official paperwork? My lawyer and I would present my alibi to prove my innocence. Immediately. It's that simple. There would be no game-playing, no prolonging what should be done, no nonsense. If I'm innocent, I want to make damned sure that I offer proof of my innocence and non-involvement in the crimes I'm suspected, or accused, of having committed before I'm carted off to jail like a bag of potatoes. I wouldn't let the State compromise my freedom; neither would I prolong my agony by withholding my alibi, or the agony of the victims' families or of my own.
No one remotely reasonable would say it doesn't just because they can't give an address lol
Further (alleged) CAST REPORT ISSUES:
The defense claims that there is data from BK’s previous visits to the park that will corroborate his frequent visits there. Which therefore tells us that his phone usually has no problem getting service in that area. Which therefore also then tells us that he must have turned his phone off, switched it into airplane mode, or that his phone was “conveniently” dead, however only for a few hours on the night of the crimes, but “conveniently” was then back on before he returned to his residence.
Also, BK’s phone went off the network when he was in Pullman, a highly serviced area.
The defense allege they have photos from other nights but not the night of the murders. Why none from the night in question? And let’s not ignore the fact that his DNA ended up at a crime scene, inside a house he’s never been in, on a knife sheath next to the victims and DNA does not = Does Not Apply
I'm assuming he's going to say yes, it was a cloudy night, so I didn't bother taking pictures of anything at the park or anywhere else. But you bring up a very good point with his phone inexplicably going off network before he really left the area of Pullman. And then if they have such a solid placement of his cell on prior nights when he's out visiting the park, why would that night of all nights be the one it's the spottiest on? (And this is based on the assumption he's going to claim he didn't turn the phone off...) I kindve wonder if he's just going to play dumb and say 'I don't know, don't remember if it died or if I plugged it in. Wasn't going to take pictures that night so I don't really remember...' I'm confused as to why his car can't give a GPS location when the phone is off. I thought most cars could by now but i guess that's not true.
If it's phone gps data that is different from the phone poling the towers.
The state has only said that the phone stopped talking to the towers.
Which is what would happen if you're in a dead zone.
The GPS data on the phone would still work and the phone would still record that it is receiving positional data from the SATELLITES. Weird that the state is refusing to turn over the phones GPS data.
@@meganco3 Yes that’s probably going to happen. His car didn’t have built in GPS. Thanks
@@Tinmann_77 My understanding is they are not refusing as per the hearing yesterday but are awaiting a cast report from the FBI. Interesting why the prosecution keep breaking the court rules and can’t get a valid alibi together after a year or so and just keep loving to delay the trial.
I kinda feel that they are calling kohberger’s bluff
How?
This is my exact thought!
Umm..nah
BK is a peeping Tom
I think they are trying to force the defence to admit they don’t have an alibi.
Justice is seeking the truth.
Thank you for being fair and putting justice first. Call me innocent, but it seems as if Billy only cares about winning. I understand that, who doesn't want to win? When it is such a huge reason for the truth to be honored, though, the prosecutor's pride should come from standing up for truth . This is a matter of justice for a citizen in the United States, not just a man's pride in Moscow. I also understand that putting your good name above a man's life is not uncommon in the court system. I pray that the true and correct outcome will prevail in this case.
In addition, the victim's & their families also deserve justice in having the right person (or people) punished. What an additional tragedy it would be to later discover they wrongly convicted BK & the families have to go through another trial.
The ones who only cares about winning are the killer and his cronies! He's in jail for a reason and if he was so innocent that you believe he is then he wouldn't be locked up.
I mean, his alibi is his alibi. If they have such a concrete, case… Why do they care?
Exactly. It shouldn't matter what BK claims because the state can PROVE different- which is their job. Jack & other's albis were they were home sleeping alone. No one can necessarily prove that true. The state has the burden of proof not the other way around. Its the state that has continuously failed to turn over discovery & keeps forcing the defense to file motions to compel...and they still haven't done so.
By legal definition it isn’t an alibi.
@@shelldeluca i thought the state said 5 times he turned over everything and the judge asked him can you just check to make sure and he said yeah he will check ..
@@prissypacheco2860there have been 14 motions to compel the state, all of which the defense won. There is still stuff that the state says they'll provide "when it's available" or that they say they can't provide because a different agency has it.
The prosecutor is a liar with a weak case.
@@Tinmann_77 i thought they said they turned in everything and the judge asked them to check again just in case?
Thanks Peter watching the replay in the uk love how you just break it down it’s the most crazy case for sure on both sides , I’m still waiting to see what they come up with in court
There is a chance that the defenses expert will testify about the GPS on his phone or pictures on his phone. The thing people forget is that electronic forensics is BKs specialty . He knows exactly what is on his phone and how to access it. This is just 😢 my opinion as someone who has followed this case very closely through court documents and his application to work with the police department, University.
This sounds like the state isn’t confident in their case. This is his alibi. If they have a strong case, just dispute his alibi.
they wouldnt be scared of his alibi if it was a clean case........ now BT is asking for more time, whos stalling?
Good point. The state probably fears that it cannot prove the time of the crime specifically enough, so they want BK to commit to a location and time first. Conversely, if the defense can show that the time of the murders overlapped with the time the elantra was seen in the surveillance footage (which is time-stamped), then the prosecution must admit that the elantra wasn't BK's, making BK's claim that he was in the park or elsewhere more credible. After all, the white elantra in the footage was the catalyst for suspecting BK in the first place.
@@twizlestick8120FALSE! defense want what the state has so they can craft his alibi around it. Alibi first. Its a game.
I think they are annoyed because the alibi is supposed to be provided with the evidence to support it so it isn’t trial by ambush.
I think they should have way more time to provide the support since they haven’t even gotten full discovery yet.
@@The80sKidRox well i will disagree, the state is the one on the heals wanting his alibi, if their case is so good his alibi wouldnt matter. when he walks free you will know ;)
Why would he sit in jail all this time if he has a valid alibi?
Many people sit in jail way longer waiting for their trials.
Because the tech as in GPS wasn't forthcoming. Now someone has analyzed it and can prove almost to the yard/foot? where he was during the crimes; and during that timeline of 26+- minutes the prosecutor has to maintain in which they occurred, might be a guess? If there aren't any people who saw him gazing at the stars, that's all he's got, then it's up to the State to refute whatever is provided in his defense by an equally qualified tech expert, let the chips fall where they may and the jury's opinion of them. The prosecutor is fearing he (or any expert he can come up with to rebut the defense's expert ) won't be able to do it apparently. His argument, his references seem desperate to me, in a DP case allowances have to be made by the judge I would imagine, and WT may have to suck this one, too. But not w/o the judge saying something cautionary to, or reprimanding AT.
Why didn't he talk to the cops? Lol he is being framed so it's probably good he didn't say anything about where he was. They would move the goal post
100 agree! And why did he not plead innocent!
@willbeard4835 for him to be framed you have to believe the police show up to scene and know they can’t solve it and that it would economically destroy the community so they plant a random grad students dna from their dna framing bank on the sheath. And then hope and pray that that persons activity’s last night from another state match up close enough to be a suspect
So interesting! Thank you Peter, i so appreciate your fairness to both sides!!
I have AT&T and can attest, my service sucks EVERYWHERE 🤣 So I believe Kohberger!
Then why drive out alone at 4 am in the freezing weather when you know your phone doesn't work properly????
Huh? My service is A one! Even when local internet is down, ATT comes through. Location, I guess matters? Even in Canada, it moved seamlessly to Rogers, I can't remember exactly server name, to a Canadian server.
lol IKR
Explain his DNA on the knife sheath
@@shanacamacho79 “The technique has been criticized for high rates of false positives due to contamination-for example, fingerprint brushes used by crime scene investigators can transfer trace amounts of skin cells from one surface to another, leading to inaccurate results.[4][5]” *wiki
I don’t think the state is necessarily worried about the alibi. I think they’re challenging the defense like a game of cat and mouse
If BT was sure they had the right guy, he wouldn't be so nervous...
100%. Something is off here
Prosecutor is desperate for a conviction, and for it to be an "outsider". Don't think they care if they have the right guy. Which they may...or may not.
State: "Your Honor, the State intends to seek the death penalty in this case, but we really need to know more specifics about the defendant's alibi."
Is the prosecutor so dumb that he doesn't realize how dumb he looks and sounds?
This guy must have been absent the day they taught law at Law School.
He's not nervous because so far Kohberger can't come up with an alibi. He can't be specific. And the reason why he can't be specific is he knows the state has all of the information proving him wrong.
@@KayInMaine And why doesn't the state give him that information, namely the cast he asked for many times? Let me do as you did, that is, let me guess: Kohberger doesn't give the complete alibi until the state gives him the information he asked for, because just as the state thinks that Kohberger could fabricate an alibi, Kohberger also has the right to think that by giving the complete alibi the state could change the missing information.
Since I've been to that park before, and it's basically opposite direction of Moscow from Pullman, the cell coverage out in the middle of nowhere is pretty garbage. Also by that point in the day your cell phone could be dead if it hadn't been charged
I think Ann Taylor is playing games. If they are depending on phone pings but then say we will provide them at a later date, then do they really have any phone data? If they say they have it why can't they provide it now? Why do they keep stalling? I don't blame the State for being annoyed. I believe in Koberger getting a fair trial but his alibi is weak imo. I also am not sure about Judge Judge. Because this is a death penalty case, televised no less, he seems extremely lenient with Taylor, maybe in fear of making a mistake? I don't know but even when JJ is angry Taylor has a way of talking right over him and it seems she does it to get her own way i.e. moving the trial. He told her 4 times it was too soon to even think about moving it and she kept pounding on JJ that no, her way was the only way. An aggressive defense and a scared Judge sometimes feels like role reversal when listening to them. There has to be a reason why she says "will provide more info in the future re the alibi". It just feels like a game to me but I am not a lawyer. What is she hoping is going to pop up "in the future" that will strengthen the alibi? Does the State even know that the parks Koberger says he was in is locked up at night? How could he have been in the park looking at stars when there are gates? I have questions.
The geodata and the phone payments are two different things right you're going to Ping off a cell tower if you stop at a red light and make a text that doesn't mean, that you stopped anywhere along the way from point A to point b. But you're going to pay off a tower. Where are you are via a satellite is different than where you are via a ping on a cell phone tower. That's how I'm understanding it and that's how my husband who was an electronics engineer worked for T-Mobile and Sprint before he just passed explained it. Anyway who knows at this point. All I know is whoever did this if it wasn't BK they didn't need to be in a car, they clearly wouldn't have had their phones and I do remember the next morning a picture of the computer through the window that said the internet or the Wi-Fi or something was not available it would be interesting to see if BK phone picked up onto anybody's Wi-Fi rather than a cell phone ping. If you go on Google Earth it'll tell you the exact coordinates of your house or where you are etcetera. But if you make a phone call right now it's not going to tell you the exact coordinates of where you are depending on where you ping from, that's how I'm understanding it I don't know maybe I read your question wrong LOL😊
She’s trying to get the rest of the discovery. IMO
Try reading the actual Alibi again! I've heard so many people say all the same things that this comment says and I just have two words🙄 Reading Comprehension! They are about to have a hearing on the very issue of the state NOT turning over the very evidence that the state is obviously withholding (or has done away with) that is NEEDED! to prove his alibi.. prove where he actually was, not where they are saying he was. Do you understand the conundrum? When someone who's holding your phone and data, and demanding that you prove where you were but will not turn over the thing, really the ONLY thing that WILL prove it.
I think BK is heavily involved in all of these games.
@@bonniefitzgerald8375You are exactly right!
Great work you!
This trial is a complete joke. Only the Read and Delphi cases can compare to the endless nonsense from the prosecutor. If he's guilty they should have slammed the case closed a year ago.
“This trial is a complete joke”
What trial?? The trial is at least 18 months out.
Plus, you don’t know anything about any evidence from the prosecutor or the defense because of the gag order.
You’ve been listening to fairy stories from channel operators looking for money.
“Only the Read and Delphi case can compare”
Read has only just begun and Delphi is a long way away. So you’re comparing non existent trials to a non existent trial. 😂
Stop sucking up RUclips nonsense like a sponge.
Peter is a real attorney. Other channels just make stuff up so that vulnerable people will join and pay money to them. Be careful who you listen to and be more careful about what you believe.
@@enigma_-_79 Amen!
@@enigma_-_79 Are you on his staff on on green's? Very nice pedantism. If you don't know anything it shows you never paid attention. We have PCA and all the details. Just not the names. And the news keeps pushing LIES that he was fired and it's revenge, that he stalked maddy, and on and on. Plus they lied at the beginning saying it was a crime of passion. Lied and said no one was in danger. The police report to the corrupt university president who has business dealings with the convicted r-pist who owns the house. Which is constantly sold back and forth between shell companies. No reason for that but money laundering or more likely for far worse reasons. The police on the scene are corrupt cops with legal violations pending from other cases. They get their pay directly from the university who is having campus police investigate a crime not even on campus. A university is a billion dollar corporation. Imagine the outcry if mc donalds were running a murder investigation lol This would be totally illegal in most states, idaho is a joke. Yet I see constant people with zero subs or content like you that show up just for this case and this one alone. I wonder why, probably many LE and university shills.
@@LTPottenger Imagine being so confused that you believe there are actually universities in America. LMAO what a clown.
Thanking you Peter for breaking this down!🙏😊
The prosecution has a legitimate point. It has 10 days after receiving BK's alibi notice to tell the defense what witnesses it will use to rebut the testimony of the defendant's alibi witnesses. The prosecution doesn't want to be surprised and needs to object now.
Can u please tell me why it’s ok to hold on to the important video and clip it up? Isn’t this illegal? Do they allegedly want details to make the CAST report off that?
BK's alibi is no worse than the "survivors," the boyfriends past & present, the frats, the "uber driver," etc.
That's absolutely true. Yet, BK, who has no connections to the victims, is being held to a higher standard.
Mkkkkk. DNA and electronic evidence will prove he was there. I think he was not alone though. We will wait to see/ hear.
@@maxbang1813 Your opinion. I respectfully disagree. Bk wasn't even in the state.
prosecution handles double standards ?
@@MercyKatThat’s absurd
I'm confused here.. How can " the stars' be a witness in the 1st place..
2nd: How could he 'watch the stars' while it is completely cloudy? They are constantly looking deep for building blocks to prevent for the trial to take place and everybody (must??) falls for it.🤔🤨.
I don’t think that the prosecution is asking for a “legitimate” alibi because of lack of evidence. Their asking it be according to Idaho law. Why should BK be treated differently? He’s not above the law. IMO he’s been given many resources. AT and team appear to be playing games, making it up as they go along.
I just don’t see anyone sitting in jail if they have a credible alibi.
Amazingly real... Belmoon... Is that if they get your tooche in custody for just about anything... Right or wrong as they may be.... You can stay there unfortunately until the LAW THAT SURROUNDS YOUR WHOLE IN " DIS"
CUSTODY reason is abolished in the court of law....usually takes a SUMMA CUM LAUDE LAWYER!!
It sucks big.. but if they succeed IN Getting you in their custody for whatever reason.. LIKE (trains planes and automobiles"
YOUR F----d!
In the state of Idaho, they violate defendants and their 2nd and 6th ammendant rights, the ACLU is suing the state of Idaho, because of the people who can not post bail to get out, because they have no money, that is kolhberger, don't be so quick to think that the state is so honest, look up (.Tuckervs.Idaho) very eye-opening about the state of Idaho and how they treat anyone with no money, or anyone who has been accused of a criminal crime? That is why he stayed in jail he could not afford bail! When you have money it is different. Until you are v in that situtation you can't understand!
@@deborahbeltz718agreed
See the case of Lukis Anderson. He was innocent but was charged and jailed until it was to obvious and they released him.
He was driving around after the murders because the knife was dumped somewhere...
Where does an "alibi" end and evidence begin? Cell phone records, etc evidence and expert analysis testimony seems more like evidence than an "alibi". Seems an alibi is more along the lines with the defendant/defense stating early on information that can prove the defendant didn't commit the crime. The evidence divulged during the trial isn't what I'd term a true "alibi".
Im sure at some point in those early morning hours BK was at the Wawawai Park. I bet data shows that. Im curious the hours because that just might very well be where the knife and any other evidence could have been discarded in the river. Speculating of course...Love how you break it all down to easily understand it, Peter! Great channel!
Or what I was thinking, what if the pings doesnt mean he was on the left of the map, but on the right side of the map. Im not describing it correctly..
Really, all that happned in that courtrrom on May 2nd was that of the prosecution reading a long list of caselaw, claimig it to be impermissible under law to give the defense council any information at all. The defense council stating that, all of the traffic and security videos, they have been given is only short clips with most of the audio removed, and the judge eventualy ruling that the prosecuton must turn-in a report on the videos on May 7.
A whole day in court for that idiotic and useless ruling.
That was not a whole day in court. It was literally one hour.
When it is hard for the state to disprove, or deprive, they do not want to accept the alibi, and that is why they do that , it is in Idaho laws? They are afraid that kolhberger has a good alibi. So they don't want to accept it!
A good Alibi of driving around and no witnesses. Not an alibi
@@A2G999I agree with you. I just happened to be driving around looking at the sky and the stars and the moon because I couldn't jog anymore. And then right around the time of the murders my phone stop tracking for some reason cuz of the area I was in and then right after the murders it started to pick up again.
@@A2G999The state is saying it's not specific enough because their rules require witnesses or a specific location.
Saying "I was driving around between these hours in this area" IS an alibi. They've requested multiple times specific disclosure to use to prove it, which is why they have ANOTHER hearing on it on the 15th.
The State can't even prove he was or wasn't, they say in their reply his phone wasn't reporting.
By their OWN evidence the only thing they can really say is that at some point they believe he was in the house or a car, or cars, that looks like his was in the area.
They're literally saying "well we can't track you to rule out you WEREN'T there so we can say you WERE. It's up to YOU to provide specifics as to how you weren't."
If that's not an alibi, then it's not a case.
People all over the world are following this case. The prosecution and judge know everything they do is watched closely and any errors will be discussed by many RUclips viewers, including many attorneys.
@@A2G999 Nah, likely gps data
The Idaho rule of alibi is different than many other states. Literally the only thing the defense added was BK going to that park and the viewing of the moon and stars. At this point I don't think the defense has come close to an alibi defense.
Has there ever been a case where someone is falsely accused and their defence team ends up finding the actual perpetrator?
Not unless the defendant is innocent.
You mean like LE staging or destroying evidence? Interesting question.
Yes, innocence project is a nonprofit group that goes around proving that the convicted person was actually innocent and the prosecutors fucked up or fabricated evidwnce
@@Sunshine-vi9mx He's guilty..
@@bernadette573 Who is LE?
Exactly! If the state has so much proof then what’s the problem?! I know the defence does have to provide an alibi but the state has been pretty aggressive in their confidence of his guilt. IMO they’re not that confident.
Agreeeeeeee 💯
Agree 💯%
Bill is shook 🤣
Santa has coal 🤣
I think the guy is guilty, but to bring a DP case against someone without having ALLLLL the proof they need to convict is not ok with me. In this day and age, nobody has an excuse to be dropping any balls. The fact that so many DA's are still attempting this is ANY case, much less a high profile one is just a little more than scary. But hubris is as hubris does.
Having said that, I believe that a man like BK is just the sort of person that would slaughter 4 people and then try to get away with it using this alibi. He's risking his life. I'm betting on the house, but in the end, justice is only justice if it's done right.
re why BT wants to preclude experts' alibi testimony, and will only recognize BK's own testimony: experts can construct plausible technical theories, which is not proof of what actually happened, 'cause they can't know, but adds another brick of un/reasonable doubt. By AT putting it directly to JJ, she knows he will consider and rule vs just enforcing deadlines and moving the case along. Both AT and BT know JJ is the weak link in all these proceedings, the bar is getting lower, and the goalposts keep moving. AT is doing her job too well playing to JJ's weakness: his long-known inability to control his courtroom. Change of venue? Please throw in a new judge with it.
When he was first arrested I was thinking he was most likely guilty because he was arrested, but I didn't have the certainty that I have with Chad Daybell or Lori Vallow. The last few months I've moved more and more to the middle. Based on what we "know" from the media there's a lot of reasonable doubt. Unless the state has stronger evidence I'd vote not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt because right now I'm 50/50 on whether or not he did it. Which is upsetting, because if he didn't do it then the real killer is laughing his butt off and Brian should be free, and if he did do it he might get an acquittal and be the one laughing at the end.
Yes! Same! There's so much back and forth, and nothing clear and indisputable coming out from the state, yet being covered in MSM as if he has already been convicted.
So many unanswered questions, from the survivors to the university's role in the case and house demolition, to the state not turning over discovery, the stalking allegations turning out to be false...definitely creates reasonable doubt, and that's all stuff the state has put out there! And the fact that no one else seems to have been investigated extensively or even considered.
I also saw that the FBI broke protocol with the IGG process, which if true, does not look good on their end. (Cannot confirm since I am not a legal professional, but I heard it on truth and transparency, which thus far seems to be a pretty reputable source, who sticks to the court documents for her info)
I'm in the middle of the road, maybe leaning towards him not being the one, or the only one, involved.
To think of this gives me the shivers. Can't, can't "accept" the idea of no Justice for this 4 beings and their families 😢😢😢
Based off what we know I think he’s guilty. The dna on the sheath is the biggest prove of evidence. I also don’t believe the defense when they say no other everyone has been found. Also the defense isn’t trying to explain the DNA away they are trying to throw it out because it is damning
@@genamar832justice isn't just convicting someone of the murders. It's convicting the murderer of having committed the murders.
The longer the prosecution plays games the more it looks like they are framing him jist to get a conviction and make the case go away.
Real killer laughing especially since the idiots tore down the house.
It just doesn't meet the definition of an alibi - right? If you allow that doesn't it dilute the definition for future cases? Precedent?
Even the judge refused to call this an alibi because it isn’t it’s laughable. If the state could probe Byran’s alibi why have they left him in jail all this time? The prosecution makes complete sense to me. Byran’s phone proves nothing the entire time the murders take place and his DNA is at the crime scene. This is login and common sense
The prosecution has never said his DNA is at the crime scene.
That small amount of DNA isn't allowed by the Military, CIA or in other criminal cases. It's "touch" DNA as in a few cells, and partially intact ones. It's a huge problem for the prosecution as is how it got on the sheath, which wasn't ripped off the perp, but left at the scene intentionally.
DNA evidence can conclusively prove a wrongfully convicted person is actually innocent, but "Touch DNA" testing also may be causing false convictions and wrong results.
@@pambp5978 his DNA is on the knife sheath which was at the crime scene
@@nomadscavenger I don’t believe it was left intentionally that was just a theory. And let me ask you this if you believe someone planted and tried to frame him then why is the amount of touch DNA so minimal? Surely the framer would have set Byran up better
Good evening!! Interested to hear what the state is saying now.
Cell tower reporting is different from GPS data. Thats what the State is clearly not understanding. Just because they only understand the cell tower data, doesn't mean the GPS data doesn't exist for the time of the homicide. Thats exactly what the defense said it's in notice of Alibi.
😂
I mean the state is the one that did the cell phone extraction as they took it at time of arrest. They definitely know if there is GPS data
I travel regularly 3 + hours to the city . I often lose cell tower coverage along the way but my GPS always accurately shows where I was and the route I travelled . In the city , there is always cell coverage , but when I receive my bill it shows either of two different towers for the same address . At my home , I always have reception with my provider but with guests who have a different provider they often will have none .
The State has experts on their team to go over all of that.
@@Pllm30 True but what's interesting in the defenses alibi response is that they say there is cell data missing from what the state has turned over. They say their expert is waiting for it and if it is not provided it is either because the state is withholding it or has destroyed it. What that tells me is that the expert has told them that there is missing data that will support his alibi that they have yet to receive from the state because the expert knows what data should exist. There is something we are missing here and it's hard to pinpoint exactly what it is but the defense seems to think they will be able to show he was elsewhere with some data from the cell phone and I think the state is nervous because they don't know what that data is. Who knows, maybe their expert isn't very good. Trust me, as a criminal lawyer I can tell you it has happened before. I have seen experts testify that are absolutely not experts but because lawyers are clueless about some of these things, they can't even tell how bad the expert is until it is too late.
Lets DO something about this travesty!!
It’s hard to take the prosecutor serious since he lost his shit during the last hearing.
agreed, that is why he wants the next hearing closed to the public...no more stage performances.
@@erin5061 Closed , and the Defendant to be prevented from having any witness in his defence other than himself and no other evidence other than his words . BTroll wants their expert witness to be disallowed . Unbelievable!
Yes yes and yes to all those questions at the beginning
It's a trap . The prosecution won't say when the time of the crime is. If BK says " I was exactly here, exactly when the crime happened" then prosecution will go "Aha, so you know when the crime was? Guilty!"
They can't. They are required to give everything to the defense before the trial starts. And if part of the reason they arrested him was because his phone pinged in the area at the time of the crime, they can't walk it back now.
@@ladywytch129so far the defense has won 14 motions to compel the state to turn over things that the state is required by law to turn over to the defense.
The state still refuses to turn over everything to the defense?
No, the state has not turned over what exact time they believe the murders took place, they've given something like a 6hr windows.
How many places were you during a six hour windows on a given day?
And actually no, his phone didn't ping near the murders on the date of the murder, it pinged within 1 mile of their house a day or two before the murders. Which is why the defense is fighting to get the cellphone data that the state won't turn over.
1. They have stated numerous times the murders took place between 4 and 4:25 except BT in thus last motion moved it to 4 and 4:30
2. Where did you see he pinged in Moscow a day prior?
"The prosecution won't say when the time of the crime is."
That's the problem I have with it, too. If the prosecution is going to be vague about the time (4:00 - 4:30), the defense is going to be vague about the place.
It's well known that the crime took place around 4-4.20 am.
I don't think State is worried- I think they are pISSED with this continued delay tactics.
The State are teh one who've had 15+ motions to compell to force them to turn over exculpatory evidence, if anyone is causing delay's it's THEM!
Freezing outdoors, icy , snow on ground , and dark- hours after midnight & the park has no evidence he entered the park in hours not allowed & just drove around aimlessly is absurd . The car with one license plate was seen riding around king road -
You don't have to look at the weather that day, just look at the videos of the food truck and the footage of the police, the night was very clear and there was no ice at all.
And it's okay for Jack or Bethany to say they were asleep with nobody actually laying eyes on them
@@nellym.6555 the night was not clear. it was foggy
UM Bill has the proof he's saying will Show that's where he was. why do people keep acting like they can just overlook that little detail? Its like your all going around your ass to get to your elbow, as they say
The roads were not icy. Alot of videos from all local areas & ring cams showing plenty of different vehicles all throughout the night & early morning.
No, Kohlberger would have had to say he went to McDonald's first, and laid on top of his car to look at stars. I think the State is pissed off because the Defense lawyer did the survey without telling anyone, and with his current alibi, social media is saying basically, Did he NOT do it?.....He has an alibi?! To my view, that's poisoning the jury pool.
If I was one of the parents of any of the murdered children, I would be really upset if it turns out Brian is not guilty and the state has no leads on anyone else. I wish they would get a move on so we can see what evidence they really have.
That's right, @debbidunn639. The 1122 King Road house (the crime scene) should NEVER have been destroyed and buried until the guilty party/parties was/were both apprehended and proven to be guilty in court.
@@YohielSpeaks
So why did both the prosecution and the defense agree to the demolition?
The Defense's objective in this trial (in any trial) is to defend their client,@@enigma_-_79, plain and simple -- not to preserve evidence for future potential investigations. The Prosecution, however, should have a broader, longer range objective -- that of brining justice to the case and prosecuting the correct suspect(s).
Because of this, the State ought to always consider the possibility of needing to resurrect the investigation in case the presumed suspect is found to be innocent. The problem with this particular case is that the Prosecution is focused on "winning" rather than focused on bringing justice to the situation via finding and prosecuting the responsible perpetrator(s).
My reply to you is being repeatedly scrubbed,@@enigma_-_79, preventing me from explaining the delicate differences between the Defense's responsibilities and those of the State.
My replies to you,@@enigma_-_79, are being scrubbed, preventing me from posting my answer to your question. Sorry!
A cell phone can still record GPS data even when it loses connection to a cell tower. GPS signals are received directly from a network of satellites orbiting the Earth, and the connection to these satellites is independent of cellular network connectivity. Therefore, as long as your phone's GPS receiver is functional and has a clear view of the sky to receive satellite signals, it can still record GPS data even without a connection to a cell tower.
Evening everyone 😊
Good evening 😊
Yawn! I'm with the state. Defense is trying to delay, claiming a false alibi. Let's get on with this sh*t show. He's wasted way too much time and money in dragging this on for so long. But, if the state has the goods to put a fork in this, they should do it NOW. I'll be honest, this case is losing me, I'm not likely to follow it much longer.
If he was at that park, why didn’t wee know about it when he filed the first version.
Maybe waiting for Discovery
Because he didn’t have discovery to fabricate it…he is toast😂
A innocent defendant can't always say where they were at a certain time until they research it. They didn't know at the time that it would be important.
I don't understand how the state thinks they can compel the defendant to testify which is what this seems to me...the only person who can testify is the defendant?
I feel they have had an extraordinary amount of time to calculate this added information to his alibi.
No , they are waiting for the prosecution tech info from his phone and so far only part has been handed over . Prosecution have that .
I disagree. The defense didn’t get the full cast report until March 31, 2024. “If the metadata don’t fit, you must acquit.”
@@BlackStump172why would they need data if he can just tell them where he was🤨 The state has the burden so if defense experts can disprove the states data, the defense shouldn’t NEED the data
BK has the RIGHT to see ALL evidence the state claims to have against him, a right to defend himself as well his right to have his own experts. It his life on the line. If the state is so confident in their findings, why do they keep refusing to turn over all discovery, the defense had to make multiple motions to compel. And really why does the state even care what BK says his albi is? Doesn't the state have undeniable PROOF he was at the crime scene at that specific time. It's their job to prove he is guilty, not BK's job to prove he's innocent.
@@shelldeluca And that's what they do. Defense just making up stories to make weak people think he's innocent while they've gotten everything that the state can give them.
Peter, you mentioned the data from Murdoch's GMC (a case I didn't follow). Isn't there supposed to be a Berla (Berler?) from BK's car? And wouldn't that be 99.9% incontrovertible?
Just my opinion, I think BK is making a mockery of the judicial system. His so-called alibi is a joke but no one is laughing, including the victims’ families. He has no one to substantiate his whereabouts. IMO he could have done this and his DNA proves he was there and he was seen by one of the roommates.
This!!!🙏💪
Yes!!! Thank you.
You are entitled to your opinion, I want to learn more about the evidence on his phone metadata, car videos, alibis of the surviving roommates.
its hard to say your alibi when you as the defendant dont know all the details and times of the case. If the prosecution wants to know exactly where you were at 4:10am and they are saying you were at the house when the murders occurred then you need the prosecutions full discovery. He also needs to the CAST report in order to show where the prosecution might have missed something.
BK has a strong GPS alibi, the only joke alibi here is "frozen shock phase"🤣
Dang I hate working nights and missing these lives! I know this is fixing to be 🔥! Thanks Peter ❤️
Wasn't Kohberger's focus of study utilizing cell phone pings in criminal cases... Or have I imagined that?! 🤔
Cloud-based forensics was his area of specialty according to his job application.
My understanding is that it's a different area, based more on cybersecurity, data, fraud and who owns data secured with a third party.
"Pursuant to records provided by a member of the interview panel for Pullman Police Departnent we learned that Kohberger's past education included undergraduate degrees in psychology and cloud-based forensics. These records also showed Kohberger wrote an essay when he applied for an internship with the Pullman Police Department in the fall of 2022. Kohberger wrote in his essay he had interest in assisting rural law enforcement agencies with how to better collect and analyze technological data in public safety operations."
"Digital forensics is a branch of forensics that works with electronic devices and data to detect crimes, examine the paths of criminals, and analyze and preserve evidence for the use of law enforcement and prosecutors."
"Cloud forensics can be considered a subset of digital forensics with a particular focus on cloud computing - and, thus, a subset of the broader sphere of forensic science. Many cloud forensic techniques and tools are therefore common in digital forensics."
IMO they want a specific route so they can pull security cameras to discredit him. I would do the same thing actually.
The State should be bothered by their utter lack of any actual evidence.
Except his DNA at the scene. Wtf
@@dsmyyyth511 Touch DNA is utterly worthless, it's unrelable at best and in no way ties him to the scene as it could have got onto the shealth as much as 6 weeks prior to the murders. And that's even if it's allowed in as it could very well be fruit of the poisonous tree as it's pretty clear that the FBI broke the law to obtain the ties to BK's dad.
I tell you what they don't have
They don't have anything that ties him to the scene, no Blood, No fingerprints, no fibres from his clothes, no prints from his shoes, no murder weapon that is tied to him.
They don't have anything that ties the scene to him, nothing from the scene in his car (that they admit wasn't cleaned) nothing from the scene in his house (That they admit wasn't cleaned), No evidence he had any connection to the victims, either in the real world or online.
I've never seen a case so bereft of any evidence in my life, the prosecution is basically saying we can't put him at the scene or find anything from the scene because he's a genius killer with a degree on forensics but he also left a knife shealth in plain view with his DNA on it.
You'd think it was far fetched if it were a Murder She Wrote episode.
I think they were under so much pressure to find the killer that they found themselves a patsy, a guy with few friends who spent most of his time alone and was a bit wierd.
It should never have got to the DA's office much less a trial.
Worried about what ? Do you people think this is an acceptable alibi ? Come on man
Usually, people "star gaze" when there is some kind of celestial-astronomical event. Wonder if there was one on said alibi night? Would there be an expert on that? TY Peter for your insight! In gratitude, life is beautiful 💜
I mean…there is almost always something worth looking at for people with a passion. Venus or mars being close or another planet being visible. Or just spotting constellation
People look at the sky every night! Most of those noted celestial events are not visible to the naked eye.
We star gaze all the time. He lives in a beautiful part of the country. In the mountains the stars are gorgeous at night.
Thank you for sharing more info about the area. Wondered if anything special/event happened on that night that may have an impact.
I go outside and sit on a swing or steps and star gaze every night when weather is good and the temp is nice. I get away from the noise of my kids and just get me time.
I agree fair game …
He's playing games he has no Alibi.why he didn't use in first place
Strategy
They already had wayyyy too much time to present the alibi! They shouldn't have had the opportunity to WAIT for anything right? That should've been one of the first things that was concluded?
There was a cut off date and it has passed for the alibi, stalling about alibi, means the state cannot do their justice and investigate like the weather, the road conditions, the gate being locked, if anyone else was in the park, so no this stalling by the defender is not right because then it’s what about the rights of the victims, I happen to have vaguely knew of them beautiful girls. The alibi matters in this case because he has always maintained he is innocent because he has an alibi. In the state of Idaho if that’s your defense you have to file it.
I wonder if what you perceive as stalling was actually the defense utilizing the time to find and hire Sy Ray and let him go over evidence for him to testify on BKs behalf about his alibi location? There just may not be the specific address or a specific witness that the prosecution needs to go investigate bc an exact address or witness doesnt exsist. Id hope the prosecution wouldnt need to have that info though bc they already have the evidence that proves without a reasonable doubt that he couldn't be anywhere else but at that house.
If the State is so sure they have It right why are they So scared ?
I didn't interpret this as the state being afraid of anything, I take it as the state seeing how BK's team is trying to get away with not adhering to Idaho code in order to provide more paperwork, have more hearings, etc., etc., in effort to further delay everything. To me, this read as a frustrated/annoyed person responding to what I consider something lacking substance and specificity. It also makes me wonder if the state is going to (try) to pull something out of the bag to prove this is a bunk alibi, and is waiting for them to say something more specific so they can respond with a "gotchya" moment-- I have so many thoughts and curiosities just related to the dynamic of and between the attorneys, haha, that's been the most interesting part for me thus far!
Rewatch here! Thanks Peter!💙