Files & File Systems: Crash Course Computer Science #20

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 сен 2024
  • Today we’re going to look at how our computers read and interpret computer files. We’ll talk about how some popular file formats like txt, wave, and bitmap are encoded and decoded giving us pretty pictures and lifelike recordings from just strings of 1’s and 0’s, and we’ll discuss how our computers are able to keep all this data organized and readily accessible to users. You’ll notice in this episode that we’re starting to talk more about computer users, not programmers, foreshadowing where the series will be going in a few episodes.
    Pre-order our limited edition Crash Course: Computer Science Floppy Disk Coasters here!
    store.dftba.co...
    Crash Course Physics episode on sound:
    • Sound: Crash Course Ph...
    Produced in collaboration with PBS Digital Studios: / pbsdigitalstudios
    The Latest from PBS Digital Studios: • All PBS Digital Studio...
    Want to know more about Carrie Anne?about.me/carri...
    Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet?
    Facebook - / youtubecrashc. .
    Twitter - / thecrashcourse
    Tumblr - / thecrashcourse
    Support Crash Course on Patreon: / crashcourse
    CC Kids: / crashcoursekids

Комментарии • 416

  • @Supermunch2000
    @Supermunch2000 7 лет назад +497

    This crash course is one of the most delightful things to ever appear on the internet.
    Thank you Carrie Anne, Stan and everybody else involved.

  • @imaytag
    @imaytag 7 лет назад +291

    Every time I watch one of these videos I always imagine going back in time and showing it to an early computer scientist and seeing their reaction to how far we've come.

    • @imaytag
      @imaytag 7 лет назад +14

      Heh, yeah. But I meant going back to a time when the technology was still developing. And seeing their reaction for those times when Carrie Anne casually references the capabilities of modern computers.

    • @sauravligal5809
      @sauravligal5809 5 лет назад +1

      evolution of computer is fast...

    • @nosuchthing8
      @nosuchthing8 5 лет назад +4

      Yeah, but they would be shocked we still don't have human level ai.

  • @23trekkie
    @23trekkie 7 лет назад +136

    Defragmentation was fun to watch... If you had angelic patience and nothing better to do.
    Before defragmentation - 25% fragmentation.
    12 hours later - 24% fragmentation.

  • @Phantom-nb5li
    @Phantom-nb5li 4 года назад +44

    It's great that the presenter doesn't shy away from "advanced" topics (in any of the videos in this course) - that provides something for every "level" (beginner / intermediate / advanced) of viewer. Great job with these videos !

  • @videoinformer
    @videoinformer 4 года назад +5

    I often speed up informative RUclips videos by 25%.
    This extremely good presenter obviates the need, and speaks just about 25% faster than "normal" with perfect articulation and fluidity that makes it easy to take in what she is saying without any flaws to distract.
    A playback speed of 80% would "undo" a 25% increase over "normal". (1/1.25=0.8).
    If you slow this video to 75% (the closest to 80% that's available), the presenter sounds like she's speaking a little more slowly than normal, so I'd say, yes, she's naturally speaking about 125% of normal rate.
    And, very well done!

  • @WiseWik
    @WiseWik 7 лет назад +604

    Only 90's kids remember how fun it was to watch defrag.

    • @hopeg97
      @hopeg97 7 лет назад +24

      Pajaat Or 00's kids with passed-down legacy hardware. I remember watching Windows XP defrag. I think I also remember Windows 7 defragging, but it wasn't nearly as fun. (born '97, so anything before 2002 is lost to childhood amnesia)

    • @JimPlaysGames
      @JimPlaysGames 7 лет назад +12

      You can always get third party defraggers with nice GUIs that show off the data juggling.

    • @huge_aubergine
      @huge_aubergine 7 лет назад +27

      I wouldn't say it was fun. I was expecting my Windows to run smoothly after every defrag, but it never happened :(

    • @RomanKorostenskyi
      @RomanKorostenskyi 7 лет назад +7

      I'm 00's kid, and I remeber that defrag^^

    • @IIGrayfoxII
      @IIGrayfoxII 7 лет назад +12

      The Windows 9x defrag utility was the best, all those little blocks.
      XP just had the stupid bar which didnt tell you much
      Windows vista and newer got rid of the animations with the claim it improves performance.

  • @Agen7P
    @Agen7P 7 лет назад +75

    We're now up 20 Layers of abstraction.

  • @PrivateYouTubeE
    @PrivateYouTubeE 4 года назад +25

    After so many years, I finally know defragmentation means and what it does. Thank you so much.

  • @vaibhavtripathi4951
    @vaibhavtripathi4951 5 лет назад +3

    crash course has biggest impact on the world in recent decade. it changes the way we see RUclips, technology and education. thanks to green brothers.

  • @evanl5299
    @evanl5299 6 лет назад +6

    I just read a full textbook chapter on this, but the way you described file systems made it so easy to understand!
    Thanks for this excellent, concise video. Great work!!

  • @dixztube
    @dixztube 2 года назад +3

    This was pretty good! Read a couple chapters today in a Linux book covering storage partitions and file systems and this had some tidbits a fairly technical book left out.
    I’ve been developing for 5 years now and finally just now falling in love with computer science

  • @sameerkumar1884
    @sameerkumar1884 4 года назад +2

    This video is really informative for knowing nitty gritty about file system specially "Block Storage"... It can also be used to understand about newly evolved Object storage...

  • @somethingnew3338
    @somethingnew3338 Год назад +1

    best explanation for file system. I saw around 10 videos till now. thanks and congrats

  • @djmontoro
    @djmontoro 7 лет назад +4

    This is by far the Crash Course series from which I have learned more. Thanks, Excellent work!!!

  • @noemiej.marquis732
    @noemiej.marquis732 7 лет назад +631

    Just realised it's a bit ironic that these computer science courses are called "crash" course. ;)

    • @jakekimds
      @jakekimds 7 лет назад +50

      Crash Course rocket science... coming soon!

    • @tanxyrogue847
      @tanxyrogue847 7 лет назад +17

      coincidence isn't irony but that doesn't stop the phrase from being ironic

    • @bakedutah8411
      @bakedutah8411 7 лет назад +1

      I wonder who first used "crash" to describe a computer getting into a fankle. It's such a common usage I'd never thought about it until you just mentioned it.

    • @AckzaTV
      @AckzaTV 7 лет назад +2

      no its not ironic because Crash Course was not made just fpr computer science, this is all brand new subject, man after they have every subject on earth done there will be No need for school or teachers and thank god

    • @justluc8556
      @justluc8556 6 лет назад

      😂

  • @lorenz_codes
    @lorenz_codes 2 года назад +6

    I feel like I struck gold with this series! Thanks for making these videos!

  • @TYKUHN2
    @TYKUHN2 6 лет назад +12

    I can understand the simplification, but it is important to remember that many programs running under Unix/Linux do not care about extension and furthermore EXT4, a common Linux filesystem, does not experience fragmentation.

    • @TYKUHN2
      @TYKUHN2 5 лет назад +2

      Peterolen very few programs (at least that I work with) care about the extension

  • @WoutiecomNL
    @WoutiecomNL Год назад +5

    Wow, my first time watching a video from your channel. As I am interested in File Systems I came across this video. You, Carrie, can explain it very clearly and your animations and sounds are pleasing on the eye ;)

  • @tylerblackstock6452
    @tylerblackstock6452 6 лет назад +8

    Love this whole series, you make it easy to understand the flow of technological advancement

  • @biggerdoofus
    @biggerdoofus 7 лет назад +2

    A bit of extra info about the making of custom file formats: since the data just needs to be in an order that the program using it can process, and that program is usually made by humans to at least some extent (though rarely entirely nowadays), it's also not uncommon to design new formats on top of text formats so that they'll be "human-readable". This is especially useful if you want users to be able to adjust data themselves, such as in the case of configuration files and simpler level editors for video games. That method also helps the data be easier to transfer across different computer architectures, which is why it's used in html and xml (formats used for websites and similar applications).

    • @Roxor128
      @Roxor128 7 лет назад

      The downside, of course, is that text-based formats are rather space-inefficient and writing routines to read them isn't the simplest of tasks. Mainly because when it's human-readable, humans will edit it, and the mistakes they make are many and varied, requiring a lot of work on your part to figure out where they've gone wrong and come up with a suitable error message. Much like writing a compiler, actually. Most of the work there is making sure the file it's been fed is valid Foogol code (I hope nobody has made an actual language with that name because it's a good placeholder name).

  • @oslonorway547
    @oslonorway547 7 лет назад +47

    I remember the first time a teacher told me to find a _file_ on a computer ..... I spent 5 embarrassing minutes looking for any icon that looked like a clipboard or spiral notebook. Later I found out that was the Calendar icon.

  • @therealquade
    @therealquade 7 лет назад +3

    >Opens audio editor
    >renames a jpg as .wav
    >opens ".wav" in audio editor
    >adds effect
    >saves ".wav"
    >Renames to .jpg
    >Opens in hex editor
    >fixes metadeta that was lost/damaged
    >Opens image

  • @thecentalist3160
    @thecentalist3160 7 лет назад +5

    YAY two of my favorite series uploaded on the same day.

  • @alexandercountry
    @alexandercountry 7 лет назад +5

    Carrie you are my new spirit animal.

  • @Revisiontecnica
    @Revisiontecnica 7 лет назад +47

    WHEN WILL THERE BE "ANOTHER LEVEL OF ABSTRACTION" TSHIRTS?!!!!

  • @enricmm85
    @enricmm85 4 года назад +5

    "Defragmentation [...] once upon a time it was really fun to watch."
    Indeed.
    RIP old Windows defrag tool 😢

  • @Blaineworld
    @Blaineworld 7 лет назад +1

    I like how these videos make use of the font Terminal. It's a really good pixel font, which it honestly has to be since it's used on the Command Prompt.

  • @vaibhavdeshmukh7900
    @vaibhavdeshmukh7900 5 лет назад +9

    How I am so late to know about this amazing channel!!! I guess nowadays youtube is getting so much filled by shitty channels that awesome channels are getting missed!

  • @bee5120
    @bee5120 7 лет назад +48

    The best thing about SSD's? No defragmentation required.

    • @BertGrink
      @BertGrink 7 лет назад +24

      Not only is it not required, but it would actually be detrimental to the "health" of the SSD, since each storage cell can only be written to a limited (albeit reasonably large) number of times.

    • @Leela_X
      @Leela_X 7 лет назад +1

      미셜비 that only half the truth. ssds will preread/precache the next blocks just in case they are needed, defragmentation can have a performance benefit even on ssds

    • @andythepandaninja3859
      @andythepandaninja3859 7 лет назад +4

      teleturbo Trying to defrag a SSD would do more harm than good as explained by Gert Brink Nielsen.

    • @Leela_X
      @Leela_X 7 лет назад +1

      AndyThePandaNinja it depends how you defrag and what filesystem you use .

    • @NizarElZarif
      @NizarElZarif 7 лет назад +7

      usually, SSDs have their own firmware and controller that knows what is the health of each block and where the data is best located. the controller along with the firmware handles defragment and file placement. this is much better than relying on your operating system since the firmware maintain optimal health and speed and reduce data corruption is best left to the manufacturer since each type of SSD uses different NAND types, and different controllers and different configuration.

  • @AuburnKamstra
    @AuburnKamstra Год назад +1

    this episode makes me desperately want a crash course linux series (sincerely, a braindead Ubuntu user)

  • @MOHx32
    @MOHx32 7 лет назад

    I can't.... Stop..... BINGE WATCHING!!! I feel the knowledge coursing through my grey matter, ALMOST TO LEVEL 9000! WHAAAH!!!!

  • @TheAAMoy
    @TheAAMoy 7 лет назад +16

    HALT and CATCH FIRE, I miss the good old days.

    • @justplainc
      @justplainc 7 лет назад

      Tell me you also watch the show!

  • @darylbangerter7171
    @darylbangerter7171 7 лет назад +3

    Looking forward to Crash Course: Interpretive Dance :)

  • @dowhile5948
    @dowhile5948 5 лет назад +1

    you have worked hard to make these videos.These videos are the best about computer science.

  • @michaniki1684
    @michaniki1684 4 года назад +1

    i always somehow end up coming back to this computer science crash course XD

  • @BBBuilds12
    @BBBuilds12 7 лет назад +32

    Ext4 is the best!

    • @archlinuxrussian
      @archlinuxrussian 7 лет назад +3

      Correctrix *xfs ;3 lol. I think we can all agree these three are better than HFS+ ;)

    • @eddiesantos7232
      @eddiesantos7232 7 лет назад +2

      But... don't you like case-insensitive filenames, strange extended attribute storage, and a *special* version of Unicode denormalization applied to every filename? :p

    • @rydohg
      @rydohg 7 лет назад +1

      archlinuxrussian Umm, actually FAT32 is the best file system

    • @hugosz283
      @hugosz283 7 лет назад +6

      My 5GB files disagree :P

    • @markgriz
      @markgriz 7 лет назад +8

      You kids get off my lawn. FAT12 forever!

  • @austina2002
    @austina2002 5 лет назад +1

    I am glad to have found this series. Very informative. I will recommend to others!

  • @HH-zi2oj
    @HH-zi2oj 6 лет назад +2

    I learned a lot from Carrie Anne than my professors xD Thank you Crash Course! :D

  • @LinhNguyen-bp9hd
    @LinhNguyen-bp9hd 4 года назад

    that clears up a lot, cant believe I have just understood fragmentation after 20years using computer

  • @ErikDaGreat
    @ErikDaGreat 6 лет назад +1

    i remember my father doing defragmentation on windows xp. it was about 7-8 years ago. i remember it was so colourful

  • @seanlee566
    @seanlee566 Год назад

    Love that the part about 'deleting a file' is the most replayed

  • @tahir1156
    @tahir1156 4 года назад +1

    Nice programme

  • @MakeMeThinkAgain
    @MakeMeThinkAgain 7 лет назад

    I so wish you would go into the details of defragmentation. Whenever I defragmented a drive I was CONVINCED I could come up with a better method. My theory is that someone came up with a very slow approach that worked well enough in the 1950s and then everyone kept using it. Prove me wrong!

  • @tuseroni6085
    @tuseroni6085 7 лет назад

    fun little aside about ascii:
    take the number of the letter you want to encode (count your alphabet, 1 for a 2 for b etc) then add 64 for uppercase or 96 for lowercase, and that's the number in ascii or utf8. if you are looking to do it in binary, and know how to count in binary, add 10 to the beginning of the number for uppercase and 11 for lowercase (or bitwise or 1000000 or 1100000. so for a you just take 00001 and add 11 to the beginning to get 1100001 for a lowercase a..you can go through your alphabet like this, 00001,00001,00010,00011,00100,00101,00110,00111,etc) if you know how to count in binary on your hands you can just count as you go through your alphabets and get the result in binary on your hand.

    • @RaymondHng
      @RaymondHng 7 лет назад

      You cannot do that with EBCDIC encoding because of its not non-contiguous letter sequences.

    • @tuseroni6085
      @tuseroni6085 7 лет назад

      why would you make an encoding scheme with non-contiguous letter sequences?

    • @RaymondHng
      @RaymondHng 7 лет назад

      tuseroni
      Extended Binary Coded Decimal Interchange Code (EBCDIC) is an eight-bit character encoding used mainly on IBM mainframe and IBM midrange computer operating systems. EBCDIC descended from the code used with punched cards and the corresponding six bit binary-coded decimal code used with most of IBM's computer peripherals of the late 1950s and early 1960s. It descended from Hollerith encoding used on punch cards. The letters A through I consisted of a punch in the 12th row and a punch in the first through ninth row. The letters J through R consisted of a punch in the 11th row and a punch in the first through ninth row. The letters S through Z consisted of a punch in row zero and a punch in the second through ninth row.

    • @tuseroni6085
      @tuseroni6085 7 лет назад

      that doesn't answer the question of WHY?

    • @RaymondHng
      @RaymondHng 7 лет назад

      A punch card consisted of 80 columns with twelve possible punch rows. Hollerith encoding consisted of one hole punched for a number, two holes punched for an alphabetic character, and three holes for punctuation characters. Punching more holes in a column weakens the card causing it to jam in high-speed card readers. When IBM developed their Series/360 mainframes in the 1960s, ASCII encoding had not been created.

  • @utkarshupadhyay74
    @utkarshupadhyay74 5 лет назад +1

    Exactly what I was looking for.Thanks for spreading knowledge.

  • @TriaMaxwell
    @TriaMaxwell 7 лет назад +4

    Does the Mongol Warrior file have a bug where it benefits from an "exception"? Or is that a feature?

  • @رحمةعثمان-خ3ج
    @رحمةعثمان-خ3ج 7 лет назад

    this is agood lesson and you are a good teacher

  • @Lucuskane
    @Lucuskane 7 лет назад +2

    what a satisfying video, I love my file system

  • @ulysses_grant
    @ulysses_grant 5 лет назад +2

    Thank you, I finally figured out what is metadata, and why it has this f...antastic name.

  • @skorakora
    @skorakora Год назад

    Small correction. All microphones are analog. There is no something like digital microphone.
    More correctly it is analog acoustic to electrical transducer.

  • @arnavattri5047
    @arnavattri5047 6 лет назад +2

    Way awesome then Galvin Book!

  • @Joetechlincolns
    @Joetechlincolns 7 лет назад +1

    I remember loading programs through DOS on start up. Changing command prompts etc. Now, all I ever deal with is testman errors using FORD scan tool software. No clue with all this new stuff.

  • @jayvl09
    @jayvl09 7 лет назад

    I think it might be worth mentioning a single file can have multiple paths. Also that hierarchical ordering mechanisms like folders aren't the only solution. We might see non-hierarchical tag-based filesystems in the future.

  • @hiteshchand
    @hiteshchand 4 года назад +1

    superb ...

  • @avi12
    @avi12 6 лет назад

    I'm fascinated by how you explain about metadata and data! So cool!

  • @davidepaula
    @davidepaula 7 лет назад +47

    I absolutely love this series. Thank you for putting this together. Do you mind sharing that Putin.jpg [9:45] file that was inside the WORLD_HISTORY directory? Oh, and tell Stans that saving passwords inside a .txt file is not a very good idea. ;-) .
    I know you have already done 20 of these in Computer Science, but please keep them coming. Thank you.

    • @UnpopularName
      @UnpopularName 6 лет назад +5

      you were thinking Putin.jpg? i was wondering what Skoodilypoop_Animation.mp4 was...

    • @mohammadabdullahansari6314
      @mohammadabdullahansari6314 6 лет назад +1

      You can find that in World History.

  • @endlessbattle9122
    @endlessbattle9122 2 месяца назад

    Thanks for the knowledge ❤

  • @borriskarlov8140
    @borriskarlov8140 5 лет назад

    this series is SO empowering

  • @ronsxx78
    @ronsxx78 5 лет назад +1

    Crashcourse is better than my college professors

  • @chaosof99
    @chaosof99 7 лет назад +1

    I would have loved to see a little bit mentioned about file compression here, or maybe this is in an upcoming episode.

    • @hciprof
      @hciprof 7 лет назад

      The force is strong with you. It's episode 21 :)

  • @learning-master8259
    @learning-master8259 Год назад

    Incredible and informative ...

  • @ler9251
    @ler9251 4 года назад +1

    Number of abstraction level > storage space in my head👍

  • @zakunknown9737
    @zakunknown9737 7 лет назад +1

    TY Carrie Anne, love your series!!!

  • @quitoxictv8307
    @quitoxictv8307 Год назад

    the fact this is free blows my mind

  • @beccaknowlton4858
    @beccaknowlton4858 7 лет назад +1

    It would be really nice if there was a Business CrashCourse

  • @BlommaBaumbart
    @BlommaBaumbart 5 лет назад +2

    2:14 - I understood that reference.

  • @sss2393
    @sss2393 4 года назад

    Big fan of your teaching. Awesome as always, thanks a ton!

  • @Mike-vj8do
    @Mike-vj8do Год назад

    These guys are awesome

  • @albinojonh
    @albinojonh 6 лет назад +1

    Nice videos! It would be great if you could talk about other file systems, for example ext or fat and show how they work and their limitations. And also, in the part of file format could have been mentioned linux administration for them (inods)
    Thank you very much!

  • @cdg03
    @cdg03 7 лет назад

    Fantastic, logical, well structured explanation. Thank you so much.

  • @miklos.
    @miklos. 7 лет назад +2

    Love the series so much!

  • @happyfakeboulder644
    @happyfakeboulder644 6 лет назад +2

    1:11 says "Hi, I'm Carrie Anne" in UTF8/ASCII 8-bit

    • @happyfakeboulder644
      @happyfakeboulder644 6 лет назад

      well i'm an idot
      i didn't realize they would show the results 15 seconds later
      2 minutes of my life wasted

  • @PongPongKiddo
    @PongPongKiddo 5 лет назад

    good explanation

  • @bayroncabrera7566
    @bayroncabrera7566 2 года назад

    This is so amazing, i cannot thank you enough for such a wornderful job.

  • @kannanhassouna8789
    @kannanhassouna8789 4 года назад

    i love this series
    so much

  • @bansika63
    @bansika63 4 года назад +1

    fast speaking and confidence in subject .

  • @Morphineck
    @Morphineck 5 лет назад

    First I though, man I'm weird, shouldn't red+green+blue = black. Then I was vindicated as you said that it was fun to watch the defragmentation process, I honestly thought I was the only one.

  • @santiagocerda7342
    @santiagocerda7342 7 лет назад

    It would be awesome if you explain how is the data represented in a screen and the way screens work :D This videos are fantastic. Keep going!

    • @hciprof
      @hciprof 7 лет назад

      Hang tight. We're getting there!

  • @menkiguo7805
    @menkiguo7805 4 года назад +2

    Wait, so SSD is not write in order?r

  • @creationpower333
    @creationpower333 Год назад

    Amazing content!

  • @StephenGillie
    @StephenGillie 7 лет назад

    A show about computer files, by computer philes, for computer philes.

  • @ebuzertahakanat
    @ebuzertahakanat 5 лет назад +2

    this great explanation but i knew it all of them and i watched to learn about togglable file systems which is not part of video and i still have 0 clue about what it might be.

  • @ykartd
    @ykartd 5 лет назад +3

    If directory files are the mapping tables, are they what get deleted when you format a drive?

  • @IIGrayfoxII
    @IIGrayfoxII 7 лет назад

    One of the reasons we dont need to defrag these days is HDDs are on SATA 3GBPS and not IDE 133MB/s
    HDD seek times are faster than what they were 10 years ago
    Lastly SATA has a function known as native command queueing which allows you to read fragmented files in which ever order to speed up file loading times
    EG Instead of going I need a music file which is fragmented into 4 bits and instead of going back and forth looking for them to read them in the order of 1-2-3-4, SATA based HDDs can read them in 4-1-3-2 so the file is loaded fragmented and it will still work, while defragging these days will help it wont have much of an impact compared to older HDDs.
    You might have a 5% gain in load times tops.
    Plus I am sure modern CPUs being fast and what not also helps.

  • @Blockietalkie
    @Blockietalkie 7 лет назад +1

    File systems are the best!

  • @AldoOjeda
    @AldoOjeda 7 лет назад +4

    Where are my "new level of abstraction" shirts and tote bags?

  • @androidaleccc
    @androidaleccc 6 лет назад

    I just wanted to say you are awesome, you do a really good job.

  • @todkapuz
    @todkapuz 7 лет назад +1

    yeah I miss watching defrag operations that were visually represented.

  • @bautistavazquez6295
    @bautistavazquez6295 7 лет назад

    This is pretty cool keep it up I wanna be a hardware engineer but I like learning about everything

  • @addison1977
    @addison1977 4 года назад

    This series is so good

  • @guyr989
    @guyr989 6 лет назад

    This explains so much!! wish I could liked it more times

  • @tanveerB5
    @tanveerB5 5 лет назад

    wow, What an explanation. Thoroughly enjoyed the video. Like The concept taking from the very basic. Thanks :):)

  • @NalinX
    @NalinX 7 лет назад +2

    really wonderful presentation. I love this series. Also, Carrie Anne 😍

  • @proxy1035
    @proxy1035 6 лет назад +2

    but how does the addressing work, it needs some form of numbers for wach byte/bit of data, like in RAM. but unlike RAM the Addresses would need to be gigantic to properly address every piece of data, like in a 930GB SSD...

    • @lotrbuilders5041
      @lotrbuilders5041 6 лет назад +1

      Super Suchti Well a 64 bit Number would be enough, but most storage media store data in adressable blocks between 100 & 1000000 Bytes in size, which are then read out sequentially

  • @DavidsKanal
    @DavidsKanal 6 лет назад

    This was so informative, loved it. Thanks so much!

  • @rjwhite4424
    @rjwhite4424 7 лет назад +1

    please continue to make these videos. They are awesome to computer nerds like me.

  • @mohamedabdelaal8582
    @mohamedabdelaal8582 5 лет назад

    this is sooo well put together! thank you!!!!

  • @stardy235
    @stardy235 6 лет назад +1

    i just came and i see a creeper in the background.
    you gain a subscriber.

  • @carolynbrown1664
    @carolynbrown1664 7 лет назад +1

    I want too"" learn all I can about science & technology good to learn what we don't know thanks

  • @liampruden733
    @liampruden733 7 лет назад +2

    Okay, so I have a burning question;
    How does the computer use binary? I know that binary is basically a long list of off and on instructions for transistors but I don't understand how turning on and off can perform an action?

    • @varana
      @varana 7 лет назад +1

      You translate them into ever more complicated systems.
      The basic "on/off" states are what is usually referred to as "binary numbers" and are written as 0s and 1s:
      10011100 11110010. As such, binary is just a number format, like decimal (base-10) or hexadecimal (base-16); binary being base-2. You can translate any number between those formats, it's just a way of writing numbers down, and computers use the binary format because that's easy to store in two states (on/off). For storing a decimal number that way, you'd need a technical way to store 10 different states of a thing.
      They talked about the subsequent steps afterwards: When the computer is expecting some form of command, such a string of numbers can be interpreted as Opcodes, i.e. things like "read" and "add", etc.
      Depending on the program that is running, data can be interpreted in different ways after that: If it's an image viewer, the 10011100 11110010 can be translated into colour information for a pixel. If it's a text file, it may be letters. If it's a MS Word file, maybe it's text, and a formatting code for "bold". And if it's another program, the data may be interpreted as another command that is executed by that program.
      IOW: _Everything_ is broken down into a number for computers, and that number is stored in an "on/off" format.

    • @tylerpeterson4726
      @tylerpeterson4726 7 лет назад +2

      Liam Rice You should go back and watch all the earlier videos in this series. It's explained very well.