I think wave C is estimated as a percentage of wave A. All the slides mention wave C as a percentage of AB wave instead. The speaker is saying the right thing though. Pretty strange no one corrected it in 4 years.
thanks for the video . but you informed that A only can be 535 , so i think this will be zigzag pattern or what ?? can you explain more .... Thank u :)
The first wave in impulsive pattern needs to subdivide in 5 waves. So it needs to be 5-3-5 to conclude that there's possibility that the 161.8% extension is wave 3 of a 5 wave impulsive pattern. Thanks.
going through all your Elliott wave video and I can say I have the best resource now . I'll just keep practicing. thank you so much
Superb ❤️😘
Thanks for the videos, brother! I got a lot out the 3 you posted today.
I think wave C is estimated as a percentage of wave A. All the slides mention wave C as a percentage of AB wave instead. The speaker is saying the right thing though. Pretty strange no one corrected it in 4 years.
*Limited Time Offer! 14 day Trial in just $1* : bit.ly/3vONA3G
Hello can there be a WXYXZ in the wave A of a Flat?
thanks for the video . but you informed that A only can be 535 , so i think this will be zigzag pattern or what ?? can you explain more .... Thank u :)
ABC can either be a FLAT (3-3-5) or a zigzag (5-3-5). Both structures are labelled as ABC but they have different look
If wave c of a regular 3-3-5 flat can reach its 161.8% extension then how do we know this is not a wave 3 of a 5 wave impulsive pattern?
The first wave in impulsive pattern needs to subdivide in 5 waves. So it needs to be 5-3-5 to conclude that there's possibility that the 161.8% extension is wave 3 of a 5 wave impulsive pattern. Thanks.
Elliott Wave Forecast awesome. Thanks for the reply 😊.