Pinned for truth. It isn't a great adaptation either, but it's better than Disney. Then again, it isn't hard to be more faithful to the novel than Disney was.
Kay I still enjoy the Disney movie. It made me read the novel and I've come to love Hugo's works so very much. Disney did a decent enough job with staying true to the spirit of the novel at least.
This was actually the adaptation of Hunchback that i grew up on. I didnt know there even was a Disney adaptation until 6th grade lmao. Brings back a lot of memories :))
I had a vague memory of an animated Hunchback from my childhood that WAS NOT the Disney version. I was starting to think I dreamt it. Thank for posting! :)
Haha you and me both! I saw this when I was 6 or 7 and then the Disney version when it came out two years later. During the part at the end of the Disney version where Esmeralda is about to be burned at the stake is when I was like "wait a minute, I've seen this story before!"
Wow - I didn't expect to like this, but I ended up really enjoying it. It's simplified without losing the essence of the book (dumbed down or "for kids"), and Quasimodo's just adorable. The ending's too simple, though, obviously. Thanks so much for uploading this!
Burbank Films Australia's films were generally stuck between being more faithful to the original works (they were all based on classic novels, rather than fairy tales) and being appropriate for all audiences. For this reason, their entertainment value often paled in comparison to Disney's (who often took great liberties in faithfulness to ensure appeal and entertainment) and might have been the reason as to why they've fallen out of fashion. Still, animation fans might get a treat from discovering some of them. My personal favorites include The Three Musketeers, Kidnapped, 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea, Peter Pan and Oliver Twist (this last one belonging to a series specializing in Dickens' novels, with all works amounting to 72 minutes in length rather than 48).
This Esmeralda resembles the real one in the original novel, I think..She was white skinned (and beautiful), but as she'd dance under sun light only her arms became brown skinned.. not her overall body was in brown color...After all she was a native french woman's daughter..
This is awesome! I still have some of these burbank films vhs tapes that I used to watch as a child. Tom Sawyer, Ivanhoe, The Black Arrow etc... such good memories!
This actually isn't that bad. Sure the animation is old and low-quality, but it's a nice and more faithful adaptation of the original book. Understandable that they changed the ending, nearly every movie of this story does to make it more happy; though I felt that the ending was rather rushed and cut off. But even so, I think it's worth watching at least once.
*hears Quasimodo's voice*: He sounds normal for the way he looks in this movie and I'm okay with that *hears Frollo's voice*: DEAR GOD KILL IT WITH HELLFIRE!!!!!
Looking at this version of Quasimodo, this is likely where Disney got their character design from. They're so similar in that they both have red hair, a green tunic, and lump over their eye. Then again that might just be how he is described in the book. Disney also likely left out the fact that he was deaf because then that would cause a lot of communication issues and it'd be hard to work around that.
Actually, while Quasimodo does have red hair and an asymmetrical face in the book, he's described wearing a bright red and purple tunic with little bells on it. So for some reason they chose to make his costume more dull and muted when making an animated adaption for kids, funnily enough.
this is the best version of the hunchback of notre dame. it has some scary stuff inside, really good, really raw cartoon. its not a bubble-gum-disney-fairy-tale. i love those 1980s australian animation, check out their Peter Pan from 1988. great cartoon
Super Spyro7956 (Blu Medic)/Ezra Dobbins (hitchhiking ghosts) i have seen disney version, i even had the toys back in the time :) it was great but it was too much "disney", too much bubblegum. this animation is like some indie production, really deep and dark. i was scared by it when i was a kid. :D peterpan 1988 australian animation also amazing, must watch
I remember seeing this on television back in 1996, actually, after seeing the Disney version. Yes, I admit that Disney were the ones who really introduced me to the story, since I was about the right age (11) when this film was released. This version is more faithful to Hugo's original tale than Disney's, but I think it's unfair that Disney got so much flack for adapting "Hunchback" (because of their Disneyfication) when they weren't the first to adapt it in the animated form. At least this version has a happy ending after all. This movie is fine enough, but I prefer Disney's take. And Esmeralda's last line to Quasimodo is something that could've been said in the Disney version.
The part where Esmeralda is tortured is chilling. Although it is offscreen, who knows what the dungeon master and guards did to her. God only knows what she went through.
How is he worse than Frollo or Phoebus. One killed Esmerelda out of lust and the other was willing to let her hang and just tried getting in her pants....Piere was just....weird with his goat loving...Or do you mean worst written character?
*Quasimodo throws his father from the cathedral and kills him* Esmeralda: You are beautiful, no matter your appearance. Me: *Facepalms* Other than the ending though, I do appreciate how this story condenses the original novel yet doesn’t take that much away from it. It’s actually impressive that they conveyed the spirit of the story in such a short amount of runtime.
Disneys version makes the hunchback look like a child on roids, this version he looks like the miserable man he is supposed to look like Also, this version isnt filled with horrible songs
Before The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air did it. The Hunchback of Notre Dame pull this Jazzy Jeff shtick at 49:52. But the only difference is The Hunchback did it outta karmic irony while The Fresh Prince of Bel Air did it outta comedic purpose. 😂 😂😂
Watched this when I was about 6 or 7 on tv, before the Disney version had been made. Then I saw the Disney version when it came out about two years later...but it wasn't until the scene st the end where they are about to burn Esmeralda at the stake that I realized it was the same story.
Right, I meant that when I personally saw this version was about two years before the Disney version came out. It was first released, as you said, about a decade before the Disney version…but that was before I was born :)
Burbank Films Australia's films are generally quite good. Even though they were made in the late 80s, they employ a visual style reminiscent of popular 60s television specials, albeit with more artistic watercolor backgrounds. They provoke a sense of nostalgia for bygone forms of storytelling, and offer solid introductions to significant works of more adult literature. Its sucessor studio, Burbank Animation Studios, on the other hand, is a joke. They provide entertaining adaptations completely devoid of artistic merit -in fact, visually these are quite cringe-worthy.
Looks like The Other Film is not The First Time Phoebus is in Yelloy and yes I Know that Other Film also has Quasimodo in Green like this Old FIlm Here
29:30 Dude, you weren't even there, how the heck would you know if she was lying or not? 30:55 Again, what do you mean? You don't know anything about this woman, what gives you the right to assume things like that?
I don't like how they portrayed the beggars as all being liars and fakers. although some ofc had to fake it so they could make a penny, a lot of them were just unfortunate ...teaching children that poor people don't deserve your care because they are all crooks...wow.
I thought this version still made it clear that the Romani vagabonds were only acting in that way out of desperation to survive (whether certain individuals were faking it or not), since no one would offer them real work to do and they were being constantly brutalized by an unjust Medieval system. The movie still had Esmeralda as a good person, who was both compassionate to Gringoire/Quasimodo, and considered the poor people in the Ghetto as her family. Clopin also explicitly points out how cruel the Nobility's court systems were to his people, that he was treating outsiders of the ghetto the same way out of fear/retaliation, and that his treatment of Gringoire is still merciful by comparison. His point is first proven when Quasimodo is interrogated by the deaf judge, has his trial treated as a comedic spectacle, and publicly both whipped and humiliated for something that was not truly his fault. I then see it proven even more, when Esmeralda is tortured into falsely confessing murder and witchcraft, when people like Frollo and the prosecutor are pulling the strings to get what they want or persecute outcasts they do not like, rather than being interested in any real justice or holiness. So I would still say that both the original book and this particular adaptation still shows the outcasts in a sympathetic light and that the real monsters of the story were the hypocrites in high society, rather than the outcasts that were judged as "unholy savages."
Depressingly enough you can still see Romani people begging on the streets in modern Europe today, because many of them are still a persecuted and marginalized minority. Unfortunately, many books and movies still portray Romani/Gypsies in a romantic light as as happy vagabonds with magic powers. Victor Hugo was in many ways ahead of his times in his portrayals of the poor and unfortunates in both The Hunchback of Notre Dame and Les Miserables.
IS THIS BETTER MOVIE THAN DISNEY VERSION?
NO.
IS THIS BETTER ADAPTATION THAN DISNEY VERSION?
YES.
Pinned for truth. It isn't a great adaptation either, but it's better than Disney. Then again, it isn't hard to be more faithful to the novel than Disney was.
Kay I still enjoy the Disney movie. It made me read the novel and I've come to love Hugo's works so very much. Disney did a decent enough job with staying true to the spirit of the novel at least.
Kay I love both versions of the hunchback of Notre dame
Kay I love the Disney's hunchback of Notre dame
bill sykes Disney actually love this version of the hunchback of Notre dame.
This was actually the adaptation of Hunchback that i grew up on. I didnt know there even was a Disney adaptation until 6th grade lmao. Brings back a lot of memories :))
"And I can run faster than anybody I know!"
*proceeds to jog briskly away*
I had a vague memory of an animated Hunchback from my childhood that WAS NOT the Disney version. I was starting to think I dreamt it. Thank for posting! :)
Haha you and me both! I saw this when I was 6 or 7 and then the Disney version when it came out two years later. During the part at the end of the Disney version where Esmeralda is about to be burned at the stake is when I was like "wait a minute, I've seen this story before!"
i thought i was the only one! i think i saw it on VHS tape when i was younger. i swear my parents thought i was imagining it 😂😂
This animation looks very similar with the Scooby doo Where are you? animation
Rohan Guy i like the disney showing only froll being mean
***** what u mean
***** scooby was in france?
*****
I like how people still respond to this comment even after a year it was posted
***** what u mean the same world
I just love Quasimodo he has such a good heart
i love the disney one greater
Melody Lady Melody me too. He looks like an angel.
Ingrid Calderon In the book, I think Hugo refers to Quasimodo as "an angel trapped inside the body of a devil"
Melody Lady Melody I hate the mondo version of the hunchback of Notre dame
I loved this film I can watch it over and never get bored with it
Wow - I didn't expect to like this, but I ended up really enjoying it. It's simplified without losing the essence of the book (dumbed down or "for kids"), and Quasimodo's just adorable. The ending's too simple, though, obviously. Thanks so much for uploading this!
Burbank Films Australia's films were generally stuck between being more faithful to the original works (they were all based on classic novels, rather than fairy tales) and being appropriate for all audiences. For this reason, their entertainment value often paled in comparison to Disney's (who often took great liberties in faithfulness to ensure appeal and entertainment) and might have been the reason as to why they've fallen out of fashion. Still, animation fans might get a treat from discovering some of them. My personal favorites include The Three Musketeers, Kidnapped, 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea, Peter Pan and Oliver Twist (this last one belonging to a series specializing in Dickens' novels, with all works amounting to 72 minutes in length rather than 48).
ebmosier1 , hello..what's your zodiac sign (in other words your birth date)?..:)
As the saying in the disney the hunchback of notre dame
"frollo's nose is long and he wears a dress."
"...wears a truss."
This Esmeralda resembles the real one in the original novel, I think..She was white skinned (and beautiful), but as she'd dance under sun light only her arms became brown skinned.. not her overall body was in brown color...After all she was a native french woman's daughter..
The Hunchback of Norte Dame shows that it's not the look that matters.... it's the ❤️
This is awesome! I still have some of these burbank films vhs tapes that I used to watch as a child. Tom Sawyer, Ivanhoe, The Black Arrow etc... such good memories!
this version also too is so very cute pretty and sweet
This actually isn't that bad. Sure the animation is old and low-quality, but it's a nice and more faithful adaptation of the original book. Understandable that they changed the ending, nearly every movie of this story does to make it more happy; though I felt that the ending was rather rushed and cut off. But even so, I think it's worth watching at least once.
+HetemSenar This version is the second best animated adaptation being surpassed by Disney. But there are another ones who are... really, really bad.
+Destroyer of Destruction You say it as if it were fact... Which it isn't.
Destroyer of Destruction Agreed
1956 version is the most accurate one. The french one, not the U.S
Frollo is incredibly creepy.
FROLO SATANIC CULTS
Of course Frollo is creepy
But he use to be a good man before his lust made him bad
This film forgets to add Frollo's Good Character
Kuro Kitsuna Well the film literally started right after he became obsessed with Esmeralda.
Ébren Álmodó I thought this Frollo was the most accurate and developed incarnation of his character.
Kind of looks like Palpatine with Sith Robes. 😂
Ironically, I believe this is the first time Quasimodo dresses in green. 10 years before the Disney version no less too!
i like disny greater
I like how he's a red head too.
@@alipilio6638”Disney.”
*hears Quasimodo's voice*: He sounds normal for the way he looks in this movie and I'm okay with that
*hears Frollo's voice*: DEAR GOD KILL IT WITH HELLFIRE!!!!!
+Super Spyro7956 (Blu Medic)/Ezra Dobbins (hitchhiking ghosts) she's munch nicer in disney
this was made before Disney they're are way worse versions of the hunchback of Notre dame such as that crap goldenfilms version ....
K Li don't get me started in the golden films one and 'the secret of the hunchback'
@@kli1487 and the new Burbank version
K Li WAIT THAT WAS A REAL FILM? I thought it was a joke! *schedules therapy*
Looking at this version of Quasimodo, this is likely where Disney got their character design from. They're so similar in that they both have red hair, a green tunic, and lump over their eye. Then again that might just be how he is described in the book. Disney also likely left out the fact that he was deaf because then that would cause a lot of communication issues and it'd be hard to work around that.
whitch one do u like
Actually, while Quasimodo does have red hair and an asymmetrical face in the book, he's described wearing a bright red and purple tunic with little bells on it. So for some reason they chose to make his costume more dull and muted when making an animated adaption for kids, funnily enough.
i love the disney u
this is the best version of the hunchback of notre dame. it has some scary stuff inside, really good, really raw cartoon. its not a bubble-gum-disney-fairy-tale.
i love those 1980s australian animation, check out their Peter Pan from 1988. great cartoon
+Lundvalnaden i love the disney one it had frollo be a monster
Please, have you *seen* the Disney version?
Super Spyro7956 (Blu Medic)/Ezra Dobbins (hitchhiking ghosts)
i have seen disney version, i even had the toys back in the time :)
it was great but it was too much "disney", too much bubblegum.
this animation is like some indie production, really deep and dark. i was scared by it when i was a kid. :D
peterpan 1988 australian animation also amazing, must watch
Lundvalnaden so your telling me that they "bubblegum" Frollo?
Super Spyro7956 (Blu Medic)/Ezra Dobbins (hitchhiking ghosts) well disney cartoons are "disney".
I remember seeing this on television back in 1996, actually, after seeing the Disney version. Yes, I admit that Disney were the ones who really introduced me to the story, since I was about the right age (11) when this film was released. This version is more faithful to Hugo's original tale than Disney's, but I think it's unfair that Disney got so much flack for adapting "Hunchback" (because of their Disneyfication) when they weren't the first to adapt it in the animated form. At least this version has a happy ending after all.
This movie is fine enough, but I prefer Disney's take. And Esmeralda's last line to Quasimodo is something that could've been said in the Disney version.
EmmanuelleLunada2010 Agreed
EmmanuelleLunada2010 other versions of the hunchback of Notre dame 's films adaptations some had happy endings too
34:08 "Oh no, It's the Devil" I react the same way everytime I see Frollo LOL
Sorry! 34:04
Quasimodo is so cute in this version lol I wanna hug him
Grew up with this and don Quijote (1987) by Burbanks as well ♥
I have this on DVD, and it's pretty good
This movie used to creep me out when i was little lol
lol, me too! I was also terrified of uncle Ebenezer in Burbank's Kidnapped
I think I saw this on a Saturday afternoon airing on Nickelodeon sometime in the early 1990s.
This is very good, Very accurate and much better than some cartoon versions I have seen, I like this a lot.
Waiting for Phelan Porteous to review this one.
do u like this one
Monseigneur Claude Frollo looks like Mephistopheles with AIDS.
do u like the disney one
I like the book one. :^^^^^^)
how come
I remember this movie when i was a kid
This film version was released 10 years prior to the Disney version.
Mmm-hmm.
@@xs0528 Thank you for realizing it.
@@disneyrules7808 No problem.
The part where Esmeralda is tortured is chilling. Although it is offscreen, who knows what the dungeon master and guards did to her. God only knows what she went through.
Please sing Hellfire! Please sing Hellfire! PLEASE SING HELLFIRE!!!!!!
Maria: The Demon Barber of RUclips omg same
I got through the entire thing sober. Take that Phelous! He was right about it not being good review material though.
Too bad everyone dies in the book.
Phobues and Pierre Doesn't
Yep I pretty much survive the whole event
Well, according to the book, your fate is worse... You get married :D Beside's you're a womanising Jerk :D Book you, at least.
Magic3Star But Piere survives... Worst character in book
How is he worse than Frollo or Phoebus. One killed Esmerelda out of lust and the other was willing to let her hang and just tried getting in her pants....Piere was just....weird with his goat loving...Or do you mean worst written character?
"Now Get Outta Here, We've Got Drinking to Do!!"
It's very close to the book.
Man Frollo is so much more sinister in this version of the story.
This adaptation gets a 4/5
Man, this version came out 10 years b/f the Disney version!
OMG!!!! I've been looking everywhere 4 this film were did u find it?
*Quasimodo throws his father from the cathedral and kills him*
Esmeralda: You are beautiful, no matter your appearance.
Me: *Facepalms*
Other than the ending though, I do appreciate how this story condenses the original novel yet doesn’t take that much away from it. It’s actually impressive that they conveyed the spirit of the story in such a short amount of runtime.
16:12 Now get out of here! We have drinking to do!
Who else came because of Phelous?😂
I also like this version and I do believe that the Disney version was partly inspired by this.
Certainly ended well for Esmerelda and Quasimodo than in the book
Esmeralda is a pretty young lady and she is actually also too much loved by all kinds of men from different backgrounds!
Aww what a nice ending :)
Wow. I was expecting this to be bad, overall it was surprisingly good! Not as good as Disney's version, though.
did the disney version take some cue from this? such as the color scheme on quasi, or the round platform he was tied to?
It’s possible!
Reminds me of scooby doo for some reason 🙀
The animation maybe
I love this cartoon,same for "Oliver Twist" by the same industrial cartoons maker "Burbanks Films".
What's with the skinny legs on Quaismodo? He is described in the novel as being incredibly strong,with a powerful body..
Perhaps he skipped leg day?
Phoebus not coming forth to exonerate Esmeralda until the near end, was he ashamed or disoriented the first time?
saludos podrian subir la del jorobado de notre dame 1986 de burbank films en español q no esta por ningun lado solo en otros idiomas por favor.
I don't know why the judge gave him a hard time Quasimodo did say he was deaf
In a book, the judge is also deaf, but not really merciful, as you see
Is it just me, or does Pierre sound like C-3PO?
Your right
He does
Frollo looks a bit like Palpatine in this version.
I remember watching this at Robert Fulton college school
The book is sadder
Ya, I consider not readin’ it.
Disneys version has got absolutely nothing on this one and it's 10 years older
witch one do u like
This one
how come
Disneys version makes the hunchback look like a child on roids, this version he looks like the miserable man he is supposed to look like
Also, this version isnt filled with horrible songs
Did the Disney version maybe take any inspiration from this version, by any chance?
I believe it took some inspiration from the 1939 film adaptation of the story
Frollo looks like a vampire
34:00 Phoebeus was dead. How this could possible? I didnt understand
Neither do I!
Frollo, And Count Olaf are Creepy
Before The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air did it. The Hunchback of Notre Dame pull this Jazzy Jeff shtick at 49:52. But the only difference is The Hunchback did it outta karmic irony while The Fresh Prince of Bel Air did it outta comedic purpose. 😂 😂😂
Watched this when I was about 6 or 7 on tv, before the Disney version had been made. Then I saw the Disney version when it came out about two years later...but it wasn't until the scene st the end where they are about to burn Esmeralda at the stake that I realized it was the same story.
Actually, this version was released 10 years b/f Disney.
Right, I meant that when I personally saw this version was about two years before the Disney version came out. It was first released, as you said, about a decade before the Disney version…but that was before I was born :)
But what about Pierre!?
ultrahotty He took Esmeralda's goat and escaped
I love this movie best movie ever
lol
Burbank Films Australia's films are generally quite good. Even though they were made in the late 80s, they employ a visual style reminiscent of popular 60s television specials, albeit with more artistic watercolor backgrounds. They provoke a sense of nostalgia for bygone forms of storytelling, and offer solid introductions to significant works of more adult literature. Its sucessor studio, Burbank Animation Studios, on the other hand, is a joke. They provide entertaining adaptations completely devoid of artistic merit -in fact, visually these are quite cringe-worthy.
Agreed!
Came to watch here because i need to write a movie review for our english subject😂
Can anyone tell me what kind of animation it is?
Saw this when I was 10. It made a big impression. The disney one had nicer animation but the story fell so short compared to this one
Agreed.
I kinda like this version more then the disney adaptation
Really?
Phoebus is still nice and hot in this old version huh 😁
Looks like The Other Film is not The First Time Phoebus is in Yelloy and yes I Know that Other Film also has Quasimodo in Green like this Old FIlm Here
Why did Burbank remake its own movie? This is a masterpiece?
It's not a remake it's an adaptation of Victor Hugo's book; remake it's a term for reimagine version that is not based on any source material.
I Love movie IT hands on me god thanks
SEND THE WITCH DOW!!!!
This was 10 years before Disney
i love this version so much better than the Disney which i think has almost nothing to do with the book
GummyBearRecords how come u did like disney
its ok but , it wasn't anything like the book
GummyBearRecords what way
+GummyBearRecords The Jetlag version is closer to the book than both, but is not nearly as good as the mentioned versions.
Destroyer of Destruction whitch 1 u like
Who's in this in 2019
Her voice almost same like Alice liddel from madness return ._.
+levios rainnor You only say this because she has an English accent and cannot see the slight distinctions that make the voice unique.
People were so prejudiced back then.
That poor poet.
Where I can find the full movie?
@Kay Thank You so much!!💓💓💓... Do you know where can I watch the Disney version 💓💓💓.
@@allyyagami3552It’s on DisneyPlus.
What was the point of the interrogation if Esmeralda's judge was already convinced she was the one who stabbed Pheobus?
What cartoon movie company made this?
Burbank Films Australia
@@xanadustudios2586 thank you
20:59 is so funny
But too bad the actual story has Quasimodo dead
36:14 when ur plan got wrong
48:01-48:04 molten lead
Ya, at first I thought it was tar, but it turned out to b lava!
Before of the hunchback of notre dame Disney 👍
Sad 😢
Someone should review this non-Disney rip-off (because the Disney version was made 1996, ten years after the first Burbank version)
How can it be a ripoff if it was made before the Disney version?
Sorry but disney did a better job in their version
Ya.
Puoi caricarlo in italiano per favore ciao
29:30
Dude, you weren't even there, how the heck would you know if she was lying or not?
30:55
Again, what do you mean? You don't know anything about this woman, what gives you the right to assume things like that?
I don't like how they portrayed the beggars as all being liars and fakers.
although some ofc had to fake it so they could make a penny, a lot of them were just unfortunate ...teaching children that poor people don't deserve your care because they are all crooks...wow.
I thought this version still made it clear that the Romani vagabonds were only acting in that way out of desperation to survive (whether certain individuals were faking it or not), since no one would offer them real work to do and they were being constantly brutalized by an unjust Medieval system.
The movie still had Esmeralda as a good person, who was both compassionate to Gringoire/Quasimodo, and considered the poor people in the Ghetto as her family. Clopin also explicitly points out how cruel the Nobility's court systems were to his people, that he was treating outsiders of the ghetto the same way out of fear/retaliation, and that his treatment of Gringoire is still merciful by comparison. His point is first proven when Quasimodo is interrogated by the deaf judge, has his trial treated as a comedic spectacle, and publicly both whipped and humiliated for something that was not truly his fault. I then see it proven even more, when Esmeralda is tortured into falsely confessing murder and witchcraft, when people like Frollo and the prosecutor are pulling the strings to get what they want or persecute outcasts they do not like, rather than being interested in any real justice or holiness.
So I would still say that both the original book and this particular adaptation still shows the outcasts in a sympathetic light and that the real monsters of the story were the hypocrites in high society, rather than the outcasts that were judged as "unholy savages."
Depressingly enough you can still see Romani people begging on the streets in modern Europe today, because many of them are still a persecuted and marginalized minority. Unfortunately, many books and movies still portray Romani/Gypsies in a romantic light as as happy vagabonds with magic powers.
Victor Hugo was in many ways ahead of his times in his portrayals of the poor and unfortunates in both The Hunchback of Notre Dame and Les Miserables.
luly lulyanka agreed. I didn’t like that either, though I totally dig Clopin’s purple mustache!
50:44 not contempt with the attempted kidnapping and potentially murdering half of Paris
А на русском есть этот мультик
Женя Корн poor Guy, I mean poor Pierre, he failed to save her, I'm going to draw this Illustration.
1986? this looks like a 1970s cartoon 🤣
The Disney version is better
250th comment: I’ll say!
this cartoon actually not suitable for children..