Chatgpt is still pretty rough due to general training modules. Will be interesting when we have the possibility of "training" it with our own reports and have it generate something that we could have written ourselves. Also if you use the playground you can actually dictate and it recognizes speech better than a lot of professional software. Cheers.
However, I feel like it would require a radiologist working at the helm, because most of the current company focus is on trying to replace radiologists. Next time I'll try it to see how accurate it is at detecting and correcting voice recognition mistakes when we dictate the reports (mostly because I lose so much time telling the residents to read again their reports before sending them for aproval).
Thanks for the video!! Out of curiosity, I tried myself with that question "what are signs of malignant transformation of an osteochondroma on mri" and the bot first didn't mention anything about the cap thickness at all. I had to ask two more question to get it to finally give a 2 cm cut-off. Why such a gap between answers?! Very interesting, but very confusing... Next time I'll try it to see how accurate it is at detecting and correcting voice recognition mistakes when we dictate the reports (mostly because I lose so much time telling the residents to read again their reports before sending them for aproval).
@@DrChristophAgten copy paste the transcribed report and ask it to fix vocal recognition errors. For now I just asked if it was capable of doing it, and it answered that it can detect and correct words that were badly transcribed mostly because the sentence doesn't make sense, and it tries other words with similar phonetics within the field of radiology (though with limits). Plus it would fix the grammatical and punctuation errors. I imagine it'll be most useful for when residents are on call at night and we correct the reports the next day. I'll test it on Monday if my hospital doesn't block ChatGPT.
I feel like chat gpt might be good for creating better templated reports in the future. However, I feel like it would require a radiologist working at the helm, because most of the current company focus is on trying to replace radiologists.
@@DrChristophAgten For how long will this be the case? Soon even signing the report will not be needed. With increased explainability and transparent AI we will increasingly see more autonomous AI applications in medicine. Also, we will soon start seeing reports in the media focusing on cases where AI saved someone life while the doctor or radiologist missed something and the public will have more trust in AI.
@@Neuronalchannel jet airplanes, even tho with auto-pilot on, still have pilots inside.. humans is the last resort of hope when everything fails..then is god.
Chat gpt 3.5 is very inaccurate but I find new version that's chatgpt 4.o to be 1 step above than the former. It's a solid improvement in my experience.
do we think radiologist will be replaced by AI? I thought about joining but scared it will be less in demand if a physician can read 200 scan per day using AI
Radiology and the role of a radiologists' will transform but it is a very exciting speciality and you can cover all areas of the medical practice so go on...
When asked "where did you get this information", the bot answers that it's "trained on a large corpus of text, which includes scientific literature, medical textbooks, and other reputable sources". I wonder which ones... Edit: When asked specifically, the bot can give a list of some textbooks it's been trained on, and says that Radiopaedia is part of the sources.
Since affordable AI which just detects and analyzes our images is basically non existing and always tailored to one organ it'll take decades to get a full functional product to actually write reports...
Can I ask a question? I finished studying medicine a few months ago. I would like to take up a residency in radiology. In light of technological advances with artificial intelligence, do you think this career path is reasonable to start?
AI will not replace us anytime soon, it might change the way we work though. Just keep an open mind. But you never know... suddenly something crazy might happen and less rads are required.
Sir, in mri I have an expensive t2 hyperintense lesion in upper cervical cord at c2/c3 level without significant enhancement and isointense to chord in t1 lesion measures about 3x1. 1x1.2 cm what does that mean?
Chatgpt is still pretty rough due to general training modules. Will be interesting when we have the possibility of "training" it with our own reports and have it generate something that we could have written ourselves. Also if you use the playground you can actually dictate and it recognizes speech better than a lot of professional software. Cheers.
Absolutely
This is so true never thought of it that way but future generations will be interesting
Just saw the title and directly someone I have been thinking of!
what do you mean?
However, I feel like it would require a radiologist working at the helm, because most of the current company focus is on trying to replace radiologists.
Next time I'll try it to see how accurate it is at detecting and correcting voice recognition mistakes when we dictate the reports (mostly because I lose so much time telling the residents to read again their reports before sending them for aproval).
Thanks for sharing
Thanks for the video!! Out of curiosity, I tried myself with that question "what are signs of malignant transformation of an osteochondroma on mri" and the bot first didn't mention anything about the cap thickness at all. I had to ask two more question to get it to finally give a 2 cm cut-off. Why such a gap between answers?! Very interesting, but very confusing... Next time I'll try it to see how accurate it is at detecting and correcting voice recognition mistakes when we dictate the reports (mostly because I lose so much time telling the residents to read again their reports before sending them for aproval).
How do you fix voice recognition mistakes with chatGPT
@@DrChristophAgten copy paste the transcribed report and ask it to fix vocal recognition errors. For now I just asked if it was capable of doing it, and it answered that it can detect and correct words that were badly transcribed mostly because the sentence doesn't make sense, and it tries other words with similar phonetics within the field of radiology (though with limits). Plus it would fix the grammatical and punctuation errors. I imagine it'll be most useful for when residents are on call at night and we correct the reports the next day. I'll test it on Monday if my hospital doesn't block ChatGPT.
The new models can also do image interpretation
I feel like chat gpt might be good for creating better templated reports in the future. However, I feel like it would require a radiologist working at the helm, because most of the current company focus is on trying to replace radiologists.
No company will the the medicolegal responsibility, there will always be one poor rad who has to sign stuff
@@DrChristophAgten For how long will this be the case? Soon even signing the report will not be needed. With increased explainability and transparent AI we will increasingly see more autonomous AI applications in medicine. Also, we will soon start seeing reports in the media focusing on cases where AI saved someone life while the doctor or radiologist missed something and the public will have more trust in AI.
@@Neuronalchannel jet airplanes, even tho with auto-pilot on, still have pilots inside..
humans is the last resort of hope when everything fails..then is god.
Chat gpt 3.5 is very inaccurate but I find new version that's chatgpt 4.o to be 1 step above than the former.
It's a solid improvement in my experience.
do we think radiologist will be replaced by AI? I thought about joining but scared it will be less in demand if a physician can read 200 scan per day using AI
No fear necessary, people get also 200c more imaging
nice topic, i think it is about time and day by day the number if radiologists will cut down.
We will see
Don't think so...
What are your thoughts on GPT4 that can intake image inputs?
Probably was too scared to answer the question XD
After AI taking over..do u recommend to take up radiology as a residency?? Or it's better to opt for other clinical branches??
you can still go radiology, no problem, the way we work will change though
Yes, but this needs a lot of work and study. Nonstop
Radiology and the role of a radiologists' will transform but it is a very exciting speciality and you can cover all areas of the medical practice so go on...
great vedio dude
thx mate
R.I.P radiology
If a patient gets harmed by a chatGPT generated report without any radiologist involved... Who would be liable for it?
If there is availability to feed by websites or PDF books. It would be great.
yes, imagine a system like this trained only with radiology reports, maybe combined with image analysis
@@DrChristophAgten I made that with my Dragon
When asked "where did you get this information", the bot answers that it's "trained on a large corpus of text, which includes scientific literature, medical textbooks, and other reputable sources". I wonder which ones...
Edit: When asked specifically, the bot can give a list of some textbooks it's been trained on, and says that Radiopaedia is part of the sources.
Actually I started using this. It is amazing and saves a lot of time
Since affordable AI which just detects and analyzes our images is basically non existing and always tailored to one organ it'll take decades to get a full functional product to actually write reports...
It maybe true until it isn't. Msk MRI will be last to be replaced 🤣
best man
u2
@@DrChristophAgten thanks dude r u in radiology
@@DrChristophAgten from which contry r u
Can I ask a question? I finished studying medicine a few months ago. I would like to take up a residency in radiology. In light of technological advances with artificial intelligence, do you think this career path is reasonable to start?
AI will not replace us anytime soon, it might change the way we work though.
Just keep an open mind.
But you never know... suddenly something crazy might happen and less rads are required.
Dr will AL take over radialogist jobs?😢
At some point it will replace many tasks we do now, but not completely
you are making me happy
same haha
Do you think AI will replace radiologists in the next 50 years?
In 50, probably but u still need some "responsible", so it'll just cut the number of radiologists by a lot
Exactly this.
Watch this predictio
Radiology in the year 2030
ruclips.net/video/Qk94Qvl8468/видео.html
IN 5 YEARS, yes
@@hydrohasspoken6227 no way, that's what they said last time 🤣
Sir, in mri I have an expensive t2 hyperintense lesion in upper cervical cord at c2/c3 level without significant enhancement and isointense to chord in t1 lesion measures about 3x1. 1x1.2 cm what does that mean?
Can this bot analyze an x-Ray ?
To a certain degree yes, but not this one
This is not GPT4?
No. Gpt3 at the timr
@@DrChristophAgten no point using gpt3.5 unfortunately, gpt4 is the only one applicable for medicine - I use it for radiology and it’s v good.
@@droliverzolman it wasn't available then. I will check it out. Thanks!
@@droliverzolmanCan you use GPT-4 to analyse X-ray images?
Wtf?
There is no use for chat gpt in Healthcare.
This is a typical trend toward laziness