I think this is a great system. It’s what will garner broad government support because number crunchers like numbers. I also think it’s a good feedback loop.
Why should the government need to be involved? This is about letting people and markets achieve better outcomes for the land, people and animals. Governments need to stay out of it.
@@naturerancher because *our* governments define the economic and social context in which good *and* bad flourish. It is the objective of the puppet masters that control governments (at present) that we disengage from influencing governments: they want us to be anarchists, while they continue as authoritarians. Sadly. The solition is, as in the Comment I offer, above (and added, below). I hope this helps, Very best wishes, John Courtneidge A small, but I consider, key aspect to terminology. In our Fair World Project's living plan for Co-operative Socialism, we value the term, 'Co-operative Careship: a) because 'care' is a verb b) because the term 'Co-operative' implies conformity with the Co-operative 'Definition, Values and Principles' as agreed, from time-to-time by co-operators, globally (see the ICA Statement at www.interestfreemoney.org/papers). Thus in this Ecological Assessment process, as described we are seeing better that a set of *collaborative* relationships: rather, we are seeing *Co-operative* Careship at work. The supportive evidence is Principle 7 in the ICA Statement (ICA= Intetnational Co-operative Alliance). Thus, Principle 7, if I tecall the wording correctly: 'Co-operatives carry out practices, approved by their membership, for the sustainable well-being of their communities.' The plural, I suggest, to that last word, includes the soil communities, both flora and micro- , macro- and intermediate-fauna. Thank-you fir this work, Savory Institute and friends, Alan Savory included.
@@naturerancher you're right, government involvement is not necessarily needed or good, but tax breaks for barriers and equipment specifically for these projects would be a great help. I love this project and I'm pleased you found out about it too. Good luck and spread the word.
I watched this video and did not see any numbers. What is being measured and where do the numbers come from? I'm not able to find out what this system measures. I don't see how a government agency can interpret a black box. I'll keep looking.
A small, but I consider, key aspect to terminology. In our Fair World Project's living plan for Co-operative Socialism, we value the term, 'Co-operative Careship: a) because 'care' is a verb b) because the term 'Co-operative' implies conformity with the Co-operative 'Definition, Values and Principles' as agreed, from time-to-time by co-operators, globally (see the ICA Statement at www.interestfreemoney.org/papers). Thus in this Ecological Assessment process, as described we are seeing better that a set of *collaborative* relationships: rather, we are seeing *Co-operative* Careship at work. The supportive evidence is Principle 7 in the ICA Statement (ICA= Intetnational Co-operative Alliance). Thus, Principle 7, if I tecall the wording correctly: 'Co-operatives carry out practices, approved by their membership, for the sustainable well-being of their communities.' The plural, I suggest, to that last word, includes the soil communities, both flora and micro- , macro- and intermediate-fauna. Thank-you fir this work, Savory Institute and friends, Alan Savory included.
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
Excellent work, well done to everyone helping with this natural approach to working the land.
I think this is a great system. It’s what will garner broad government support because number crunchers like numbers. I also think it’s a good feedback loop.
Why should the government need to be involved? This is about letting people and markets achieve better outcomes for the land, people and animals. Governments need to stay out of it.
@@naturerancher Regulations to make this farming practice standard would be my thought on that.
@@naturerancher because *our* governments define the economic and social context in which good *and* bad flourish.
It is the objective of the puppet masters that control governments (at present) that we disengage from influencing governments: they want us to be anarchists, while they continue as authoritarians.
Sadly.
The solition is, as in the Comment I offer, above (and added, below).
I hope this helps,
Very best wishes,
John Courtneidge
A small, but I consider, key aspect to terminology.
In our Fair World Project's living plan for Co-operative Socialism, we value the term, 'Co-operative Careship: a) because 'care' is a verb b) because the term 'Co-operative' implies conformity with the Co-operative 'Definition, Values and Principles' as agreed, from time-to-time by co-operators, globally (see the ICA Statement at www.interestfreemoney.org/papers).
Thus in this Ecological Assessment process, as described we are seeing better that a set of *collaborative* relationships: rather, we are seeing *Co-operative* Careship at work.
The supportive evidence is Principle 7 in the ICA Statement (ICA= Intetnational Co-operative Alliance). Thus, Principle 7, if I tecall the wording correctly:
'Co-operatives carry out practices, approved by their membership, for the sustainable well-being of their communities.'
The plural, I suggest, to that last word, includes the soil communities, both flora and micro- , macro- and intermediate-fauna.
Thank-you fir this work, Savory Institute and friends, Alan Savory included.
@@naturerancher you're right, government involvement is not necessarily needed or good, but tax breaks for barriers and equipment specifically for these projects would be a great help.
I love this project and I'm pleased you found out about it too. Good luck and spread the word.
I watched this video and did not see any numbers. What is being measured and where do the numbers come from? I'm not able to find out what this system measures. I don't see how a government agency can interpret a black box. I'll keep looking.
A small, but I consider, key aspect to terminology.
In our Fair World Project's living plan for Co-operative Socialism, we value the term, 'Co-operative Careship: a) because 'care' is a verb b) because the term 'Co-operative' implies conformity with the Co-operative 'Definition, Values and Principles' as agreed, from time-to-time by co-operators, globally (see the ICA Statement at www.interestfreemoney.org/papers).
Thus in this Ecological Assessment process, as described we are seeing better that a set of *collaborative* relationships: rather, we are seeing *Co-operative* Careship at work.
The supportive evidence is Principle 7 in the ICA Statement (ICA= Intetnational Co-operative Alliance). Thus, Principle 7, if I tecall the wording correctly:
'Co-operatives carry out practices, approved by their membership, for the sustainable well-being of their communities.'
The plural, I suggest, to that last word, includes the soil communities, both flora and micro- , macro- and intermediate-fauna.
Thank-you fir this work, Savory Institute and friends, Alan Savory included.
Wilson Michelle Martinez Ronald Anderson Jose
Hernandez Kimberly Young Jessica Martinez John