Plausible reasoning is the logic of science

Consider supporting the channel: / @jonathonriddell
Try Audible and get up to two free audiobooks: amzn.to/3Torkbc
Recommended textbooks:
Quantum mechanics:
amzn.to/3Ar5dbn or amzn.to/3ckXkfL
Statistical mechanics:
amzn.to/3QYcere or amzn.to/3cmZb3u
Quantum information:
amzn.to/3Kpjt96 or amzn.to/3KpjAl2
My publication list: scholar.google...
Instagram: / stat.mech.in.action
TikTok: www.tiktok.com...
Twitter: / jonathonriddell
Discord: / discord

[@katesmith4991]

This was great a great intro tying it to everyday life. I loved stat mech

[@user-rv9zu5dd6n]

It was really interesting,
.
.
.
But you are telling me that that is a microphone and not a hair dryer!!??!

[@JonathonRiddell]

It's a trade secret

[@tensorfeld295]

The hair style is telling us that this must be a hair dryer! Just consider the wind direction causing the hair to be in place.

[@matterasmachine]

Physics is extended statistics. It’s not fundamental. Fundamental reality is huge robot and that’s why action is discrete and speed is limited.

[@levprotter1231]

Yeah, those words provide 0 insight.

[@matterasmachine]

@@levprotter1231 Why truth should provide insight? Nothing has to be plausible - author is wrong. Universe does not have to work the way you want it to work. Does not have to have plausible explanation.

[@matterasmachine]

​@@levprotter1231 Scientists should search for algorithms, not for formulas.

[@georgesamaras2922]

@@matterasmachine Formulas are 2000 years old algorithms are 40 years old. Give them some time

[@matterasmachine]

@@georgesamaras2922 formulas were algorithms even 2000 years ago