Just double checking - the thumbnail associated with this video is of Jakob Ingebrigtsen, and the title of the video relates to doping. Are you implying he is doping?
I'm more interested in overall health rather than obsession with "winning". I concur with natural methods of training and good old fashioned work, but I refuse to put stimulants like caffeine in my body for a race or even to wake me up in the morning. Caffeine can also have detrimental effects on some people - just ask Panera Bread customers who died from drinking highly caffeinated lemonade.
does breath holding increase EPO naturally??? and if it does would not that mean you DONT have to go train at altitude ???? you can train at sea level....or will it increase even more if you go to altitude and do both there,,, but would tht show up as blood doping , rumor has it that LASSE VEREN blood doped back in 72 olympics,,, if you are putting your own blood cells back in your body how can you test for that??? and if you train at altitude and breath hold to increase you red blood cells increase your EPO with altitude and breath hold how is there a test for blood doping???
I heard there was a means of testing for the body's natural EPO against synthetically produced EPO, so those who have been caught using EPO have been tested positive for synthetic..
Micro-dosing EPO ... everything wrong with that. Damaging Hinke Schokker's running-career because she tested positive on ADHD-medicine she has used for many years also before competitive running? Disagree!
All to often, Unfair Advantage and Risk to Athlete are in conflict with ethics of the sport. Why? Because sometime it takes certain banned drugs to get the athlete to the point of being average and to not take the drug would actually be a risk to the athletes. Examples of these are steroid use by those with low testosterone or asthmatics who need certain drugs to breath. Both drugs are banned and is automatically assume to be enhancements or cheating.
but if there is a drug that is available that anyone can take if they choose to, and help in performance one chooses to take it the other chooses to not, why is it illegal??? so someone takes it the other person does not take it ,.... where is the person who chooses not to take it at a disadvantaged i say it was his choice not to take it the other person took it and it helped him
Because by your logic, if you were a runner who was competitive, then you would be forced to take drugs to enter into races if doping was legal. Do you see how silly that would be?
@@mountainstream8351bro, because you wouldnt have a choice, you'd have to take it or you wouldn't be competitive. Also even now, if most athletes are doping, its controlled. Because you are limited how much and how often you can dope , because of testing. It would end up a free for all and would end up the athlete who is willing to risk his life for victory, would win. Imagine sports being promoted in schools with a choice like that? You'd have parents doping kids. The status quo is completely flawed but the only reasonable option
@@mountainstream8351 more than likely you are correct, probably you are correct, but it would still be a choice , to take or not take, EPO, is produced i the kidneys naturrally, but you can go to alitude and train you can also breath hold, both of those have shown to increase red blood cells....now not everyone can go to altitude to train so should therre be a rule that you can not go to altitude and train you must only train at sea level....
@@mountainstream8351 ok, so someone who has a known advantage is not cheating, someone training at altitude is a known advantage, someone who can not go train at altitude is at a disadvantage, is that fair??
If you're over 50 and you want to optimize the way you train, then check out our free training for runners over 50: coachparry.com/pkt6-Free-Training
Just double checking - the thumbnail associated with this video is of Jakob Ingebrigtsen, and the title of the video relates to doping. Are you implying he is doping?
so your saying jakob has been doping all this time to get these fast times???
I'm more interested in overall health rather than obsession with "winning". I concur with natural methods of training and good old fashioned work, but I refuse to put stimulants like caffeine in my body for a race or even to wake me up in the morning. Caffeine can also have detrimental effects on some people - just ask Panera Bread customers who died from drinking highly caffeinated lemonade.
Started running in 2010 & was shocked that some athletes were still scared of taking caffeine/coffee 😂😂
Nothing wrong with that. Let them be afraid and you take the win!
does breath holding increase EPO naturally??? and if it does would not that mean you DONT have to go train at altitude ???? you can train at sea level....or will it increase even more if you go to altitude and do both there,,, but would tht show up as blood doping , rumor has it that LASSE VEREN blood doped back in 72 olympics,,, if you are putting your own blood cells back in your body how can you test for that??? and if you train at altitude and breath hold to increase you red blood cells increase your EPO with altitude and breath hold how is there a test for blood doping???
I heard there was a means of testing for the body's natural EPO against synthetically produced EPO, so those who have been caught using EPO have been tested positive for synthetic..
Coach Parry desperate, now resorting to clickbait. To put Jakob's image qualifies as defamation, doesn't it?
Why is Jacob on the thumbnail 😮?
Clickbait
Micro-dosing EPO ... everything wrong with that. Damaging Hinke Schokker's running-career because she tested positive on ADHD-medicine she has used for many years also before competitive running? Disagree!
9:53 "you can get similar benefits to what elite athletes get on EPO"...what!!!! 😱
Good video..thank you👍
lol... "sprinting to the bathroom." I'm caffeine sensitive.
i use coffee and pop-tarts. works like a charm
Why is Jakob Ingebrigtsen on the thumbnail of this video?!
All to often, Unfair Advantage and Risk to Athlete are in conflict with ethics of the sport. Why? Because sometime it takes certain banned drugs to get the athlete to the point of being average and to not take the drug would actually be a risk to the athletes. Examples of these are steroid use by those with low testosterone or asthmatics who need certain drugs to breath. Both drugs are banned and is automatically assume to be enhancements or cheating.
I'll presume Jakob is a doper shall I?
Of course he is.
Says so in the picture @@nickvledder
their have been many top athletes coming out that region in the past 5 years
but if there is a drug that is available that anyone can take if they choose to, and help in performance one chooses to take it the other chooses to not, why is it illegal??? so someone takes it the other person does not take it ,.... where is the person who chooses not to take it at a disadvantaged i say it was his choice not to take it the other person took it and it helped him
Because by your logic, if you were a runner who was competitive, then you would be forced to take drugs to enter into races if doping was legal. Do you see how silly that would be?
@@mountainstream8351 i disagree, why would you BE FORCED, you have a choice to use or not use.....
@@mountainstream8351bro, because you wouldnt have a choice, you'd have to take it or you wouldn't be competitive. Also even now, if most athletes are doping, its controlled. Because you are limited how much and how often you can dope , because of testing.
It would end up a free for all and would end up the athlete who is willing to risk his life for victory, would win. Imagine sports being promoted in schools with a choice like that? You'd have parents doping kids. The status quo is completely flawed but the only reasonable option
@@mountainstream8351 more than likely you are correct, probably you are correct, but it would still be a choice , to take or not take, EPO, is produced i the kidneys naturrally, but you can go to alitude and train you can also breath hold, both of those have shown to increase red blood cells....now not everyone can go to altitude to train so should therre be a rule that you can not go to altitude and train you must only train at sea level....
@@mountainstream8351 ok, so someone who has a known advantage is not cheating, someone training at altitude is a known advantage, someone who can not go train at altitude is at a disadvantage, is that fair??
Terrible content.
At the highest level, everyone is on steroids. Winners are those with the better doctors.