Native American Stone Tools And Artifacts ~ BEST ARTIFACT CLEANER !

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 7 фев 2025
  • After trying many cleaners, Murphy's oil soap is the best I have found. It adds some degree of conditioning and is very mild. The only drawback is it takes about three weeks for the artifacts to fully dry.

Комментарии • 60

  • @paleobrostones2023
    @paleobrostones2023 Год назад +4

    Awesome Stuff right here. Enjoying the critiques.
    Ignorance is Bliss.
    Thanks for all you share.

  • @nancywoodland3061
    @nancywoodland3061 Год назад +1

    Great as always! Keep up the good work! Ignore the dullards. 😘💞✌

  • @rodneykelso4555
    @rodneykelso4555 Год назад +4

    Awesome artifacts. I learn so much from your channel.
    I have a tremendous area in Midwest Illinois to hunt. Hoping to start being more intentional about this hobby. hobby

    • @brentkuehne435
      @brentkuehne435  Год назад +1

      Illinois is a great place to hunt! Artifact rich.

  • @OntarioAtOrion
    @OntarioAtOrion Год назад +2

    At 9:20 is a little stone i call a mushroom stone. I found one just like it and wondered what it was for. It seems to be a tool but i also think it resembles a mushroom 🍄

    • @OntarioAtOrion
      @OntarioAtOrion 5 месяцев назад

      @@lesjones5684 we have a friend nicknamed Mushroom soup

    • @OntarioAtOrion
      @OntarioAtOrion 5 месяцев назад +1

      @@lesjones5684 Kerr? Is that you?!?!

  • @highplainschipper6564
    @highplainschipper6564 Год назад +5

    Great collection of creek stones,ill give ya that.just ridiculous.

    • @ericschmuecker348
      @ericschmuecker348 10 месяцев назад +2

      Yup. They get pissy when told they are wrong. Embarrassing.

    • @ronaldgeorge9057
      @ronaldgeorge9057 8 месяцев назад +2

      I'm sorry but you don't have indian artifacts. You need to do better research.

  • @FacesintheStone
    @FacesintheStone Год назад +3

    Fantastic artifacts. It is leafy out there! Thx for sharing

    • @FacesintheStone
      @FacesintheStone Год назад +1

      5:43 beautiful full Duckhead left side portrait. That is a generational effigy.

    • @FacesintheStone
      @FacesintheStone Год назад +1

      15:57 I really like the Axe at the end. Compelling collection.

  • @D_Do-see-do_c
    @D_Do-see-do_c Год назад +1

    At the 2:34 mark of video that one 🤔 I think it is a weapon of protection type. like when someone goes into woods wearing a knife not to ues to protect. Or like a baseball bat/golf club behind the front door for that just in case. So it could have been a women's or a man's. Not much wearing in ues for it may never been used just sitting there just in case. Got a few myself. 🤓 Looks like a 3 or 4 wood club 😁
    Thank you for the video 👍👍

    • @brentkuehne435
      @brentkuehne435  Год назад

      Could be? It's a bit small ,but they definitely used similar stones for clubs.

    • @D_Do-see-do_c
      @D_Do-see-do_c Год назад

      @@brentkuehne435 not so much on size matters. If war weapon yes. These they could have been a children weapon of protection. Dad going hunting for food, mom kids protect them self from wildlife, animals coming into camp types of protection.😏😁 Rodents removal "weapon"/tool. Thank you for the videos 👍

  • @savvyg713
    @savvyg713 Год назад +3

    Unfortunately none of these are artifacts, I’ve very sorry. They are just cool river rocks, not used by man. I’ve been hunting for years and have display cases full of tools and arrowheads. Next time check for knapping marks or just google what tools look like

    • @brentkuehne435
      @brentkuehne435  Год назад +1

      I would love for you to do a video showing how the knapping technique was used in making hardstone tools?

  • @Nammyohorengekyo108
    @Nammyohorengekyo108 Год назад +2

    The last piece you can see a dog or bear head on one side and a bird when turned over . I have found Stone Age portable art similar to this depicting animal and human faces

  • @everettwilliams6952
    @everettwilliams6952 Год назад +6

    Rocks , no artifacts

  • @maytagmark2171
    @maytagmark2171 Год назад +8

    There are no artifacts in this representation of natural worn and weathered stones. Any wear and polishing you are see in these is from natural erosion by nature. Plus any kind of conditioning with anything other then water of an actual artifact is frowned upon highly. Conditioning river rocks like these does make them prettier so no harm there.

    • @thomashofling4504
      @thomashofling4504 Год назад +5

      Thought the same. Not one clearly recognizable artifact, only river pebbles.

    • @leveljoe
      @leveljoe Год назад

      A couple have possibly seen some limited use, but they are certainly not "museum worthy."
      There are no stone artifacts that can't also be explained by natural processes. Man is also a natural processor.
      Sooooo???
      ...mehhh..
      Usually, it comes down to the level of symmetry or refining that makes it unquestionably shaped by humans.
      What defines an artifact?
      I have a a rock I regularly use as a hammer stone. The rock can be left outside, cost nothing, and is easily replaceable. Would it be considered an artifact 100,000 years from now?
      Nope, but it actually is.

    • @pareidoliarocks
      @pareidoliarocks Год назад +1

      So, I'm not quite sure what you mean. Do you mean, no artifacts that you recognize? Or maybe you don't accept the more average, run of the mill grinding and polishing stones as artifacts? It is hard to tell on things like this. I would have to put them in my hand and inspect for different textures on one ore more facets, but I'm no expert.

    • @maytagmark2171
      @maytagmark2171 Год назад +3

      I mean exactly what I said. There are no artifacts displayed here. Only natural time worn rock. I am well familiar with the average use tool as I specialize in them. Absolutely no human alteration, use wear or typology present in any of these. There are plenty of them that could have served the purpose as speculated as they are shaped favorably to make them into a tool. But none show any signs of this. @@pareidoliarocks

    • @maytagmark2171
      @maytagmark2171 Год назад +1

      To say it in other words you would agree that to be considered an artifact of human use it has to display some amount of human modification from shaping to suit or used wear. And the evidence of both surviving to analyze. @@leveljoe

  • @dannytorreyson8946
    @dannytorreyson8946 10 месяцев назад

    Thanks

  • @joycee5493
    @joycee5493 Год назад +1

    Thank you

  • @patriciandcowgirl6044
    @patriciandcowgirl6044 Год назад +1

    Awesome artifacts

  • @gypsyrose429
    @gypsyrose429 Год назад

    No one seems to know what they were used for.