Back to watching your videos from the Red Lion next door. Not been over for so long. Hope to camp at least once a month then twice when not icy. Long trip on the bike this morning. Thank you for giving me my grease monkey fix every week.👍👍
Another great video, thanks Neville and extra thanks to Brad for the (albeit cramped) tour of the Mossi. Nice to 'see' Jodie back again, hope she had fun removing the tailplane.
One or two of these video's have jumped up on my you tube stream and what these men are doing is marvellous, but what crosses my mind is how much of the original aircraft is being used or is all the airframe new with old parts being used as patterns. So is it a restoration or a reproduction copied from original parts.
Sadly in my opinion, this is a replica, but using the original parts to do so, but there will not be many aircraft of this age, flying today, that are even 80% original
If you watch videos 280 and 282 Andrew Patton goes into the reasons that most if not all of JJ`s parts are not suitable for airworthy. It happens with all WW2 type a/c restorations worldwide. Aluminium just degrades.
@@stevem7868-y4l So, using your logic, if you replace enough worn out parts on your 1960's Ford Cortina MK1 with enough Ford replacement parts, you car is no longer genuine Ford Cortina, it's a replica. If Avro was still going today and they replaced worn parts with new ones ... you say it's longer a genuine Lancaster but a replica. Total and utter twaddle
@ so in your logic, i use the logbook of said 1960 Cortina/ along with the chassis plate, and i build a car up from every part off Ebay, and thats an original car? No it is not,
Thanks Neville a cracking video this week, you're off to a flying start for 2025 😂👍👍
Back to watching your videos from the Red Lion next door. Not been over for so long. Hope to camp at least once a month then twice when not icy. Long trip on the bike this morning. Thank you for giving me my grease monkey fix every week.👍👍
That was fun climbing into the mosquito , Fun fact , the wingspan is the same as the TBM Avenger
As always Neville .So many thanks for your total commitment , ❤
Your awesome Neville (as are all those working at the Lincolnshire Aviation Heritage Centre)! Best wishes in 2025 Sir .
Another great video, thanks Neville and extra thanks to Brad for the (albeit cramped) tour of the Mossi.
Nice to 'see' Jodie back again, hope she had fun removing the tailplane.
Thanks Neville
loved it.thank you
Excellent
Thank you Nev
One or two of these video's have jumped up on my you tube stream and what these men are doing is marvellous, but what crosses my mind is how much of the original aircraft is being used or is all the airframe new with old parts being used as patterns. So is it a restoration or a reproduction copied from original parts.
Sadly in my opinion, this is a replica, but using the original parts to do so, but there will not be many aircraft of this age, flying today, that are even 80% original
If you watch videos 280 and 282 Andrew Patton goes into the reasons that most if not all of JJ`s parts are not suitable for airworthy. It happens with all WW2 type a/c restorations worldwide. Aluminium just degrades.
@@stevem7868-y4l So, using your logic, if you replace enough worn out parts on your 1960's Ford Cortina MK1 with enough Ford replacement parts, you car is no longer genuine Ford Cortina, it's a replica. If Avro was still going today and they replaced worn parts with new ones ... you say it's longer a genuine Lancaster but a replica. Total and utter twaddle
@ so in your logic, i use the logbook of said 1960 Cortina/ along with the chassis plate, and i build a car up from every part off Ebay, and thats an original car? No it is not,
You are both right 😂. The Trigger’s Broom conundrum 😂
I saw a picture somewhere of a mossie with an oxygen bottle blow out , it just shrugged and flew on