ANOVA with Tukey's HSD Post Hoc Test in SPSS
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 4 окт 2024
- This video demonstrates how to conduct an ANOVA with a Tukey’s HSD post hoc test in SPSS. The results of pairwise comparisons with a Bonferroni correction are compared to Tukey’s test.
SO incredibly helpful! Thank you so much for thoroughly explaining what the different tests and the significant differences they show mean.
incredibly helpful.. I couldn't thank you enough!
Very helpful! I chose factorial ANCOVA for my design and I was trying to determine what to do to check for Type 1 errors. It is evident that equal sample sizes are Tukey HSD and unequal are Bonferroni Correction. Thanks Dr. Grande.
My sample sizes are unequal. Should I not use Tukey HSD ?
I am glad this this is a robust measure. What would be a rough estimate of how far assumptions could be off where you would not consider running this test?
So a key reminder to myself in conducting ANOVA would be the assumption
of normal distribution in the variables and of equal N values for each
level of independent variable?
Thank you very much my friend
You're welcome -
help a lot！but...can i ask you how to statistic for unequal sample size in post hoc test in SPSS? Thanks!
Thank you so much, it is really helpful, I just have a small inquiry, let’s suppose that the dependent variable ‘symptoms’ is a Binary variable or a Ranked variable instead of a Continuous one. Which test should be used? Thank you in advance !!
"The results of pairwise comparisons with a Bonferroni correction are compared to Tukey’s test." Which one should we report since you run multiple analysises at the same time?
Hi Todd thanks for this educative piece, however I would like to know what effect having outliers. Secondly, if the levenenes test results in a highly significant difference what would be the next step to take.
So helpful, thanks so much. Just a quick question...is it ok to use 'Tukey' when conducting a three-way factorial ANOVA (BBW) ?
Hi sir! Idk if u notice me, I've question. "Post hoc test are not performed for.... (dv) because at least one group has fewer than two cases" - what does this mean sir? Can you explain for me? 😅
Your videos on ANOVA have been very helpful, but there is something i still don't understand about post hoc tests. I just carried out a post hoc test on SPSS and all the pairwise comparisons where significant (ie the sig was all 0.000). How do i report this?
Hey Todd! What if you would like to find the p-value between Individual male to all others (Individual female, group male, group female and so on), and then Individual female to all others, Group male to all others and so on?
I mean that, because I can do it using pairwise comparisons, but I want avoid type I error (or can I just do it using fisher-bonferroni?). Great videos btw. Tnks in advance.
Hello I got some result from the spss program and I've been trying to interpret but I don't really understand the concept of interpretation despite have watched you video over and over. Is there anyway u can contact you directly so I can talk to you concerning it. Thank you in advance.
Please help Todd. I did a one way ANOVA in SPSS and in the pairwise comparison section of the spss output it showed sig. differences between some of the groups but in the homogenous subset table it grouped all the groups into one homogenous subset. How can this be? If there are sig. differences in the pairwise comparison eg. group 1 is sig. different to group 2 how can the analysis then put group 1 and 2 into the same homogenous subset. Is there an explanation for this?
I want to compare the concentration of a molecule in different tissues from the same subjects. in spss I put a column for the subject and the other columns for the concentration in the different tissues. the concentration does not follow a normal distribution. I tried the arithmetic transformation (Log10, square root, ....) it did not give a normal distribution for all the groups. is there another method of transformation of data to make them normal. and haw can I interpret the results.
someone can help me
thanks
great... but can you help me for 3 varaibles