Friends, glad to see so many reactions to this video. So I want to address everyone. Let's not be so categorical because of the first insights about the future Ghost Recon game. I still hope that Ubisoft will not be able to just abandon the multi-million audience of loyal fans of the series, who supported Ghost Recon games just because they were third-person games. So I think there's a huge possibility that a future game will feature an optional camera view switch from first-person to third-person. This practice has been used in recently released games and worked brilliantly. So I don't see any problem to implement it in the future Ghost Recon as well. Let's believe that it will be a really great project that will attract both new audience and loyal fans of the series. Thank you for being with LugovoisesGames! Cheers!
No 1st person view = No buy for me (as was for Wildlands and Breakpoint and etc.) Ghost Recon used to be 1st person, when it was a succes ( Ghost Recon: Island Thunder was my favorite) They should have 3rd and 1st person view as was allready made possible by modders (for WL and BP) and then everybody can be happy. It's allready shown that it's possible and available. If they're smart they still fix it for WL and BP too, then i would buy those games too.
I choose to remain realistic in my expectations. Ubisoft at best is a flawed company and they have not made anything of quality in a long while. The clear choice to not go to the community initially shows they are disinterested in addressing the shortcomings of previous games and the pitfalls of future choices. I hope for the best and prepare for the worst.
i WILL ALWAYS want to have a real and perfect hybrid game of "WHAT IF GHOST RECON MEETS ARMA3?" idea in the next sense: 1. detailed managing of the squad (of lets say 6 men team) to arma spirit 2. giving to the squad leader (gamer) the choose of choosing between 3th person/1st person and even also a "2th person" mixing the best of the 1st and 3th person ones 3. selecting what team members i want in my team per mission by soldier class 4. having 2 maps: a. one general map of the area of the mission (like in the breakpoint game) (given in paper) b. and other smaller map for analyzing the current combat point (given via what a predator uav sees) 5. i want back my crosscom of my team members (GRAW AND GRAW2)
The ONLY way Ubi listens to the community is through sales numbers and they don't lie. While many successes and some flops happened to 3rd p games, their all time best selling title was an FPS and they generally sell better than 3PS. This doesn't mean they shouldn't offer a 3rd p option though.
Yeah, you're absolutely right. It's been a mystery to me for a year now, too. Anyway, we'll wait for more insides and news. Hopefully they will give players the option to optionally switch the camera to third-person view😉💪
@SeanChristOne I agree. But the world is a better place with @LugovoisesGames 3rd person gameplay videos. I'd never want them to end! They're just too awesome. If UBI won't give the option, "someone" will ;)
Actually Ubisoft do listen and that’s the problem, everyone was asking for first person and now that it’s happening they are complaining 🤣🤦♂️ you can never please anyone i swear
100 percent agreed. 1st person is awesome, but you can never properly appreciate the character skin and graphics like you would in 3rd person. Sth I want in this one is photorealistic graphics, with a more fluid weapon manipulation (similar to unrecord, aka bodycam game), and much more emphasis into story development, and AI development. If they do this properly, take their time, and really make sth good, like even add a sandbox open-world mode like DMZ but PvE strictly, and have players who finish the campaign carry out ops in this realistic middle-eastern environment, it'd be a best seller. COD is dying right now, especially in the milsim department, so we really really need a decent milsim with photorealistic graphics and decent mechanics and animation.
I hope they offer both options, FPS and TPS. The ghost recon community can keep playing 3rd, and they can pull in FPS fans. I also LOVE the cultural feel of Wildlands. The people, the colors, the language, especially the music. Those elements gave me great escapism. When I hear Latin music in public, I think of Wildlands, then come home and play it, even though I finished the game.
I also hope they give the option to optionally switch the camera view. So that the game will keep loyal Ghost Recon fans who love the third-person view, and also attract those who only recognize the first-person gameplay💪🤝 Let's see. Looking forward to more insights!
@@LugovoisesGames What about the fans from before that when it was a first person shooter?? I like the 3rd person option too, but there are plenty of loyal fans that want a real 1st person version and this sounds like maybe it is. I didn't really get into the last game until the 1st person mod came out, but it's not a good 1st person experience at all. Now it might actually be an amazing open world larp game with immersive and realistic combat. If BP had a RON style of 1pp I would play it non stop.
I don’t see them having both, if they did why didn’t the insider mention first and third person perspective? I ofc want both but don’t see ubisoft doing it
i m literally haunted by the guy in the enemy camp singing "la santa.... LA SAAAANTAAAAA" what a real video game feeling same as the old playstation 2 vibes when you add a mood at the game and people who spend hundreds of hours in knows perfectly the ambiance, windlands make me love bolivia . i hope fps gonna be an option too
I love GR Wildlands. I have crawled over every square inch of that world. If I have any complaint, it is my ability (or lack thereof) to retain assets. When I steal a plane or boat or Unidad armored vehicle, I should be able to take it to a Katari rebel base and it remain there and not disappear after I leave. Especially the airplanes, because the map is so huge that a plane is very much needed in order to get around quickly.
This is possible in breakpoint. I actually prefer breakpoint over wildlands. You might too especially with the motherland add on you have faction wars appending all over and have to conquer territories based on difficulty just like in wildlands.
I’m still playing Ghost Recon since 2019…I love the game but I play realistic…slowly….i map out the area and take out each Bad Guy while not being seen or heard….love it
@@kkkjhjhuv5884yea but it used but people don’t just want to control drones there’s a lot of people fighting on the frontlines it can be done but I don’t think breakpoint did it right with all the tech stuff like the tanks and shit
Here Is how I hope it will be... A campaign covering certain regions of the map and finally once its done, opening up a bigger open world with smaller side stories.
If it’s an open world again, I like this idea. Being completely open from the beginning is too much. I also don’t like gun unlocks spread across the map.
@@CrzBonKerz21 Yeah...I feel like new weapons should be unlocked every few missions with a reason why the weapon will work better in that scenerio and later after the game is done you'll unlock its varients...I want old school storytelling and great A.I characters...We deserve this much
I really wish they would.I wouldn't think twice about buying it.The very first ghost recon and it's add on were the best multiplayer game. I personally think it would give COD A run for its money. Having your own server being able to set the amount of respawns so it forced you to play. Run and gun and camp with your last couple response.
Here's the thing, you either have a very polished first person with a bit clunky or unpolished third person and vice versa or you have both that are mediocre, can't really have both that are extremely fluid and polished.
@@zedus4042I think it's cool they're going back to their roots as an FPS title. Though I have played the newer ones and grown accustomed to both styles, FPS and TPS..
3rd person ISN'T tactically OR milsim accurate - IRL you can't astral plane above and outside yourself to check out the enemy from behind cover... I have NO problem with both perspectives being offered - a concession to choice that 3rd person fanbois generally won't accept.
Look..I’ve grown really attached to Nomad. I think they should incorporate him/her in the new game. All of these games, both Wildlands and Breakpoint were IMHO great! Even after they developed DLC and other story modes..I say we give them a chance and see where they take it, and if they are willing to listen to their fan base.
@@Exotic-_ that’s my point. He’s a tough guy. You have to be when you’ve been shot down several times, hunted, lost your closest friends and then have to kill someone who used to be you service brother (I served IRL…I couldn’t imagine) He has to be cold, and they let you select dialog like Elder Scrolls did in their games which is dope.
Its crazy how everyone talks about wildlands like it's a god tier game now😅 when wildlands released and for sometime after, everyone was calling it trash and heavily criticized it at every corner🤷 oh but now all that complaining got us to where we are now and these games are touted as ideal....Maaaan. perfect example to just enjoy the games, be supportive and hopefully they will innovative the series correctly because when they try to yall just complain ✅
I can't believe they decided to drop the third person perspective! Ubisoft is once again ignoring the community! I'm disappointed. Hopefully the game will have an option to switch to third person view. Thanks for the detailed review, man. And congrats to the winner of the giveaway!
I share your frustration. However, maybe they will still add the ability to optionally switch the camera to third-person view! Looking forward to more insights😉
I am glad they got rid off third person, it was terrible. OG ghost recons were FP and I am glad they LISTENED to community and implementing first person mode. Going back to roots!
I've been playing Ground Branch a lot, and that game is the epitome of shooting. And if the next Ghost Recon is able to deliver 50% of GB gunplay while having a story and various missions, I'm all in.
So I’m actually excited about the fps variant of ghost recon, assuming that this is true taking a team of 4 and essentially having a tactical shooter game would sound fun
"Ubi is ubi" is spot on! I couldn't have said it better. Well, I think either it will be a complete failure or we'll get something new and unique in the milsim first-person shooter genre. We'll see😉
Yeah, like other RUclipsr said in his other video, what makes me hate Ubisoft is that they don’t always make bad games, sometimes they nail it, like on Wildlands, so we never lose hope on them lol
Ghost recon was originally first person way back in the day on pc.i think if they kept it open world with a survival aspect and realism it would be great but also have a 3rd person option
first person is amazing. no more ghost peeking and making it an actual tactical shooter. almost nothing about wild lands and break point were tactical and realistic, and hopefully they really bring back their roots.
I am ultra excited for Ghost Recon in first person. Honestly, I never liked third person cameras in games, especially immersive games like GR, so I always played with those FP mods, but now, it is going to be a huge thing.
Yep - I was a GR player from release of the very first game - but they lost me with 3rd person - or more precisely going to 3rd person with no 1st person option.
Sounds similar to the og ghost recon with it being first person squad management. Honestly I haven’t played much of the first one but it would definitely be interesting. Sounds like possibly Ghost Recon and Splinter Cell are going back to their roots
You have to remember the first Ghost Recon games were first person. I'm super down for them to go back to first person view, and this is a really good time for Ubisoft to come back on top with the Tom Clancy franchise by making them mil sim (in their respective genres) especially with how popular it's becoming now a days. The original Clancy games were all technically realistic games for it's time. I'd love to see Rainbow Six fall back to it's former glory as well, and I'm super excited for the Splinter Cell remake.
It’s wild to see how many people are vehemently opposed to it being a modern take on the original formula, but then turn around and say they’ve never played it. Like ask long time series veterans and most consider the first game to be the best.
right!? All these clowns talking about how they love all the realism, yet they whine about how it just HAS to be in third-person... see the problem there?
You really think they can make a game as good as them again?!?!?! M8 it's GOOBISOFT ARE YOU DUMB?!!! They haven't released anything but trash for years now and are ACTIVELY STEALING our games People don't realise that isn't the same Ubisoft, they cared back then and respected our time and money Now they hate us, don't listen to us and just try to rob us and milk is dry
@coreycasciano3255 it still wouldn't be ghost recon, if you look at old ghost recon they had core mechanics for the AI like if your AI teammates get killed they stay dead until the mission is over then you got new replacement AI teammates the list goes on for what ghost recon is beside first person, third person has more valuable mechanics than first person
@@bradleymoreland62 I mean I get how 3rd person would cater to a larger market but OG rainbow six and ghost recon both had great ia and squad order systems while first person. Planning missions was the shit. It be cool if it got like ready or not level of immersion
@tannerbottineau62 it would also be nice if they would have a selection at the beginning of the game for first or third person. Hell they can remake wildlands with the breakpoint mechanics and I'd be happy with that
@krisztiannagy8983 Won't matter to them. If you don't buy that's solely on you. For every 1 person that doesn't buy, there are 100 others that will recover the cost that you didn't. Also, the naysayers right now who loved 3rd person may want to re-examine themseleves. GR used to be a strict FPS only, and then the newer ones came out that were 3rd person, and some liked the evolution. (I didn't), but many others did. I am sure the same will happen if this is an FPS only. However, they may decide to do a 3rd person mode option as well. I've never seen a GR have a 1st and 3rd person option by default. It's always been strict, one view or the other. It will be interesting to see what happens. Don't put the cart before the horse!
So, I love how Ghost recon has handled the balance of 3rd and 1st person gameplay in Wildlands and Break Point, but I’ve also been playing since the original Ghost Recon came out and originally the Ghost Recon series was only 1st person and it was pretty much the only tactical no nonsense first person shooter at the time. It sounds like they are returning to their roots.
1st person is great for the milsim immersion. 3rd person is great for looking at how cool your character looks with all the cool branded gear they put in the game!
If there's no 3rd person option it will be Call of Duty a shame. Ghost Recon is a great game series been playing since Future Soldier it's sort of in it's own league really in my opinion. I hope they add in the option to switch between 1st and 3rd person perspective, fingers crossed.
I loved future soldier. Been playing since ghost recon first came out on ps2. Love the series I don’t really care if it’s 1st or 3rd I just want it to be good
Why is everyone so upset with GR getting a first person title? It started out as such from what I've seen and did it well. There has been a few third titles since then with the last fps title being 2007 I think. If they decide to do both views they should make them both great instead of do both not well. But with just 1 option (FPS), they can perfect it. Also, just because a game is an FPS, doesn't mean it's like COD, it is just perspective
no third person no thanks, Third person is what made Wildlands and Breakpoint so great hoping the devs are paying close attention to the community and picks up on what we want and what we are willing to pay for
First person perspective adds another level of realism to the game which is what UBI are going for, a more realistic experience. The older games were first person anyway (depending on which version of the game you played)
We just need an updated breakpoint in a different setting with a little better graphics. Don’t over think it. I would be fine with more dlc content for breakpoint.. I’ve been to every base so many times I just need a new open world
Im sure there will be great improvements in 'OVER', but for me bro..no way am i going back to 1st person shooter, i just dont like the view..its too limited ! I've years of entertainment to keep me going, GR wildlands & breakpoint, Sniper Elite 4 & 5, and God of War( not played it yet lol) each to there own bro, im sure plenty of folk like that kind of set up, i will just crack on with what i have😉, rest easy bro,have a good week,happy hunting👊
Man, let's not jump to conclusions about the new Ghost Recon just yet. I still hope they don't allow themselves to completely ignore the series' fan base of millions, who have grown so fond of the game over the past decade precisely because of its third-person playability. Maybe they'll make it optional to switch the camera to both first-person and third-person view. Like it was implemented in the recently released Starfield. Let's believe in the best and wait for more insights. I will keep you updated! You have a good week too, brother!😉🤝😌
@@LugovoisesGames Bro, i am optimistic, i hope they give a TP option, then i will be interested, but if its going to go FP only, that would kill it for me ! A lot can happen in a year, my play is starting to get a little better, im not getting killed so much, im currently working on Episode 1, im now 225hrs of play, soon ads up 🥵🤣, catch up later bro its 04:07hrs here..im just up, 1st coffee😉🫡
My 1st GR game was GRAW2, but the 1st person PC port and I absolutely fell in love with it. After that, I played Future Soldier, Wildlands & Breakpoint, and I really enjoyed the experiences each one gave (expect Breakpoint at launch with the bullshit RPG elements). So for me, I don't really care for the camera perspective. As long as the game is grounded, gritty & immersive, with no robots. Give us the option to choose, please Ubisoft🙏
For me, the best option for everyone to be happy, is to give players option to play in 1st person mode or 3rd person mode, just by using one key. Sth like in PC version of GTA V. And also in my opinion, they should change hiding mechanism into GTA system. Using keybind to stick to the wall, or hide behind obstacle is more precise for me.
No Third Person Options Choice Forget it. I'm Big fan of GHOST Recon especially wildlands and Mercenaries Playground of destruction, The Saboteur, Just Cause, Grand Theft Auto 4,5,6, if Any Ubisoft Ghost Recon iPs Removes Third Person Options in their Future Game's just Like the New Ghost Recon Over then that's definitely Deal Breaker... And if they refuse to Add Third Person Choice Options in Near future then no not interested. Same said for 8 or 9 Casual Fan's Gamer's play online with none of them saying their interested in this NEW Ubisoft mistake make in Next Ghost recon over New iP.
Yeah, that's what I think too! I think they want to combine the best of Modern Warfare and smaller games like Ready or Not and Insurgency Sandstorm into this game. It might be something new in the milsim shooter genre!💪
hi. am an old fan of recon series (literally), and first ever cod or far cry as well. my humble opinion is not popular maybe but...some of us just love both game styles, depending on mood and fight scenario. me love 3pers view, animations, gear details much. some days just wanna walk and explore first. prepare for attack. for this 3view is more emmersive for me and visually reacher. but when it comes to fight, especially in cqb I simply move like a dog in da fog. in far cry style i am moving fast and deadly. here I die often because my camera flyes where i dont expect it to be, or animation does flips and its over. its more natural looking through my eyes and fight. so ideal would be - as they do with other options - to leave a user his choice. 😊 peace.
I too think Ubisoft should just let players choose which camera view to play with, first or third person. It would be a perfect compromise for both the players and the studio itself. After all, this way they will attract a new audience and will not lose the loyal fans of the series of recent years.
I have played GR since 2004, I think thats when it first appeared. I enjoy the milsim 1st person perspective as it relates to real world situations. For myself, third person gives me a “cheat” perspective of what is around a corner, one that is not available to an eyes only perspective. One has to rely on sound and anticipation more with the original fps style. It makes me a better player as it makes me work harder, but at the same time I can directly relate to lines of sight etc… . I feel individuals like myself need the ultra realism of realtime 1st person perspectives, and the newer generation of human needs their 3rd person. Either way, it sounds like a great experience that Ubisoft is preparing for us. I of course will not rely on boycotting if I don’t get my version. But the old Ghost Recon definitely ups the realism, and will be a blast I’m sure.
Always happy to be helpful. Well, I don't think we should jump to conclusions just yet. Let's wait for new insights, maybe the game will make it possible to optionally switch the camera to third-person view😉
Ghost recon needs to be a 3rd person shooter!! That or be able to switch between the two. Sad to say it but if they lock it into first person I won’t be buying it. Ubisoft if you want a first person shooter make a new title don’t try and slap it into a game franchise like Ghost Recon.
So basically a Far Cry, an open world, first person shooter but tactical with a grounded and gritty tone of Modern Warfare. Hell f*cking yeah. Though it is gonna be made by Ubisoft so I don't really know what to expect from their perspective on "gritty" as Ubisoft is woke, sensitive and goofy as fuck in their recent games which is a hard no for this type of game. Also, how can people hate that it's gonna be first person, that's what excites me the most by far. You can't get more immersive than having a well made first person perspective.
So IF its FPS only then all the character customisation with everything goes out the window.How lame Ubi if you,re going to cut this huge corner.This is what us GR fans want and we don,t just want to see an end of a gun swaying around. IF they make it switchable then it will be great.Hoping also we can still have a open world to play and not just some mission based area then finish (like the ridiculously short COD games) Ubisoft think about your hardcore GR fanbase because guaranteed you will lose a massive amount of them.
Your review definitely needs to be shown to Ubisoft. I agree with every word of it. You know, I still hope and believe that they will give us the ability to optionally switch the camera to third-person view like they implemented in the recently released Starfield. Therefore, I don't see a problem to do the same in Ghost Recon. Especially considering the fact that this series has been positioned as a third-person game for over 10 years now. You can't just pick up and spit on Ghost Recon's fan base of millions. Do you think I'm being overly optimistic?😅 Hope springs last. Let's wait for more insights😉🤝
Wildlands strategic system and difficulty.. and re work the physics and update the melee combat from.breakpoint.. add gore... some pure controversial scenes similar to mentioned.. deep story that has you making delicious that would haunt you.. lesser of two evils kinda choice. Third person open world.. and make it live service.. so that after a year or two.. you can add an edition that beings you to a new location with a complete new story.
Ubisof va ha volver a meter la pata haciendo un juego en primera persona rompiendo la saga ,no escucha la comunidad y después vienen las madres mias pk no venden ,es un error debieran de hacerlo en tercera persona y para usar armas si te conviene utilizar la primera persona ,se van ha cargar una saga como es Ghost recon ,es mi humilde opinión y como usuario y jugador de esta saga ,creo que si la comunidad hacemos presión ubisof puede hacer un buen juego y no una copia de call of duty
Sí, por desgracia esta decisión rompe por completo la ideología de Ghost Recon de los últimos años a la que nos hemos acostumbrado y hemos llegado a amar. Sin embargo, creo que definitivamente no será una copia de Call of Duty. Creo que quieren combinar en este juego lo mejor de Modern Warfare y de juegos pequeños como Ready or Not e Insurgency Sandstorm. Esperemos a conocer más detalles😉
La comunidad podríamos presionar a ubisof para que desarrolle el juego en tercera persona y opcional poder jugar en primera persona ,creo que recogiendo firmas y mandarlo a los estudios ubisof nos podrían hacer caso a la comunidad ,es una opinión ,podríamos hacerlo una recogida masiva de firmas de toda la comunidad a nivel mundial ,sería la ostia
Lo que sabemos hasta ahora es que Ubisoft está posicionando el juego como un shooter en primera persona. Esperemos que permitan incluir opcionalmente una vista en tercera persona.
1st person is so popular because it puts them in the scenario and mimics more realistic feel to tactical shooters makes you connect with the character 3rd person lets you make decisions based off thing you would never actually see by abusing camera angles
No 3rd person, no buy Ubisoft will just end up turning it into a generic forgettable FPS, and us console players will back to having 0 tactical shooters yaaaay
Entitled much? The Original was First Person and was the best! Waa waaa it doesn't come with a feature you don't want so you won't buy. You are the epitome of an entitled millennial. Grow up! You were born probBly in late or early 2000s, weren't you? You have no idea what tactical means do you?
Stop being an entitled bratt. Just because it doesn't come with a feature you don't like, you won't buy.... The very first Ghost Recon was First Person, and it was the GOAT! Were you born in the early or late 2000's?
I know what you mean. I too was initially shocked by the news. However, I'm believing the best for now and hoping that players will be given the optional ability to switch to third-person view. We'll see...😉
I hope there are realistic elements such as crack sound from glass give away to enemies... the birds in the jungle suddenly fly off... the foot prints in the mud, sand or in the snow... and much more that you can think of...adding environmental destruction also is very nice... and please make it available both offline and online
Lets See how it will be. I hope it's become more realistic and the story could be better. Aka the cutscences were so robotic and unnatural. I'm not a big fan of Ubisoft anyway, so it was kinda predictable.
We'll see about that, buddy! I think they want to combine the best of Modern Warfare and smaller games like Ready or Not and Insurgency Sandstorm into this game - make a cool story with an emphasis on hard realism. This could be something new in the milsim shooter genre! At least, I really want to believe that😁💪
I am very exciting ghost recon is going back to its original roots as a FPS. I am a huge fan of the Ghost Recon games and I am not disappointed at all. Even though I loved Ghost Recon as a third person shooter I feel like this will give New Life to the franchise. Can't wait!
If thats the case, me too Bro ! At least they should give the player the choice of switching to First Person, or to third Person. But If they make IT that way i think they loose a big big Fan/Player Base
Not only that, as it would be okay if it was just an option, however they need to lose this online live service shyte. Relying on Ubisoft servers in order to be able to play is complete bullshit. Still play Wildlands to this day as I consider it to be superior to Breakpoint on so many levels. Breakpoint was just a lush map with no activity. Literally a huge map of collecting flowers lol.
I really hope that we either get to see nomad return or that we get to see what happened between the end of wildlands and the beginning of breakpoint aside from just flashbacks.
I have never been into shooters, however, a couple years ago I got ghost recon: breakpoint, and I still play that game quite often (it followed my jump from xbox to pc). personally, I like wandering the world in third person, but then I always had my aiming settings down the iron sights. I prefer shooting from the sights of the actual gun. I don't know what to expect. From what I've seen in the gaming industry as a whole, the major game developers haven't really been listening to their fan bases and going the way of what games look best for advertisers. I'll treat the new game the same way I treated the newest Forza game, I'll wait for it to have been released for a couple of months for evaluating
I believe the concept of first-person shooter a very good concept because that is real I don't know about you but when I think of a gunfight I don't think of a camera over my shoulder me looking through it I think of me using my eyeballs however I do hope the game stays open world because mission-oriented is nice but sometimes it's more comfortable and challenging with an open world cuz then you have multiple outcomes multiple choices and that is war multiplayer and negative outcomes at least in a game setting
GR wildlands was freaking awesome. The perfect sized map, weapon mechanics everything was almost perfect. Breakpoint on the other hand I did like the solo taking out the camps and everything. the new stealth mechanics and vehicles. Graphics were top notch but idk something about the gameplay was missing. It didn't feel like a ghost recon game. Enemies would spot you from afar even tho you were hiding.it was ridiculous. I hope this one feels like wildlands.
Breakpoint became a problem when I ran out of ammo and wanted to use a dead enemy's weapon to stay in the fight. They didn't drop weapons when the game released because they wanted you to loot chests and boxes for gear with levels. They fixed the game by removing that part entirely. Breakpoint now played like Wildlands and its great. But I still love Wildlands.
I think it’s a step in the right direction considering how there were rumors that it was gonna be a battle royale. On one hand, I think they shouldn’t take away from the identity of it being a third person franchise. I would like an option for fps though, I suppose. Ever since I went into the military and actually learned how to shoot guns, M.O.U.T., land nav, small squad tactics and the lot I would like to immerse myself in a bit of FPS. I think if it has any sort of openness with sizable maps so you can approach how you would like (I envision what MGS V Phantom Pain type of game play) it could be nice as opposed to a linear map like they had in GRFS (still a great game though). While I like Wildlands and to a lesser degree Breakpoint I still think they had their issues. Wildlands felt great but the voice acting was weird in some spots, like when they said “class a uniform“ it just felt off with the tone they used (a small nitpick), the story was great but it seemed overwhelming to literally go pick any operation of El Sueño’s. They also said if you tackled the security portion of the operation it would lead to lesser amounts of personnel in other missions and areas but it didn’t really seem like it. The time line seemed off, Kozak wasn’t apart of the ghosts yet in a dlc but they referenced him getting a divorce in some side chatter in the core game. If Kozak was apart of the unit, where was the camo from GRFS in the core game? Why was Nomad a major, I can see a captain being boots on ground but that’s the highest point an officer should be to leading a small fire team like that if at all really (my own opinion on the matter, idk how spec ops handles manning lol). When they did finally put in active camo, it was merely cosmetic and the enemy knew you were there 😂 Other than a few relatively small things great game. It had a great crossover with The Predator, the weapon selection was phenomenal (although I hate that the m60 was behind those stupid loot crates), the weapons used the actual ammunition, there were plenty of npcs in every biome just about (I’m spacing on the snow biome right now) the side chatter from your squad felt real. Now Breakpoint starts off terribly because Weaver gets killed by Walker like 5 mins into the game, that first couple updates from my account you were straight up solo, like hasn’t the game been squad based for years?? I can think of a couple of missions in GRAW 2 and GRFS where you’re solo but it wasn’t the whole game. The weapons were pretty limited at first and they all used a bastardized ammo type. Like of course the M4’s and AK47 used 5.56 and 7.62 respectively but my 5.7 and P90 took 5.56 the Tac-50 took .338 (I think every .50 did too) there was zero distinction with 7.62x39, 7.62x51 or 7.62x54 unlike in Wildlands which used different calibers which led to some pretty weird loadout situations that I had to keep in mind not to use my favorite 5.7 if I had any M4/AR platform since they used the same round in game. The gear level introduction was needless imo, I felt like it was trying to be more like The Division. The Rainbow Six and Terminator crossovers were kinda sub par if you ask me. The survival aspect was an interesting concept but I don’t think I ever really used it. The world was super underpopulated, I thought people were supposed to be trapped on the island but I think there was less than 250 noncombatants on the map. Dumbed down helicopter controls were so annoying, in Wildlands I could dodge and weave from AA fire but if any AA sees you in Breakpoint you’re done. There were good things though. They finally gave us squad members (albeit rather quiet ones), the third installment where they added the Bodark story was peak in my opinion and the rewards were amazing too like the functioning active camo that you can use in the regular game mode too, the ability to turn off the aerial surveillance drones (always turned it off after I destroyed the manufacturing plant in the core game, it was written into the Bodark story mode) the customization was pretty good (I do wish you could pick which part of a gun you could pick to paint more specifically, like when I used gold on an AK it would paint over the wooden stock but not the hand guard, a small complaint honestly) So I guess what I’d like to see from a next installment of the series is I guess semi open maps on a mission to mission basis like MGS V PP was, a system where you can command your squad like in GRAW 2 GRFS, set in a world after GRFS with Bodark and active camo with an option for FPS, I’d like it to have the roll mechanic back in the game. I’d like to have a GRFS type multiplayer system too if possible. Oh, if they do decide to go the MGS V route, we should be able to go back to maps and be able to explore more of those areas, there should be a base camp you could walk around and maybe even upgrade too like a specially purposed aircraft carrier. I also miss the M.U.L.E. from GRAW 2 so I’d really like drone type squad members or something like the Boston Dynamic pack carrier. Shoooooooot while we’re at it, make a tachikoma companion like from Ghost in the Shell lol All I know is I’m cautiously optimistic about this new game, I’ve been a fan for almost 2 decades now. So here’s hoping lol 🤞🏻🤞🏻🤞🏻
As a big fan of the Ghost Recon series myself, I'd be happy to see the next game as a tactical first person game, but in the open world setting of Wildlands. I prefer the tactical first person experience from the older games (Have modded GR Breakpoint to be just that), but loved the open world setting of Bolivia in Wildlands, with all the randomness that came with it.. Made it feel alive. Breakpoint was a big step down from Wildlands, with the AI being boring as h#ll, just repeating the same 5 lines over and over again (And being WAY to loud) Things I'd like to see: -Open world setting like Wildlands -A more alive world like in Wildlands. Loved the vibe of that game -The full control of how to approach missions like in Wildlands, with me (the player) being able to choose stealth or full force fights. -First person (With the option to switch to 3rd person for the people who like that) -The World Parameters from Breakpoint, so i can customize the gameplay experience I'd like, BUT with an EXTRA 'Hardcore' mode, where the bots don't go all invincible when they spot you, but are always 2/3 to the chest (Depending in range, caliber and ammo) and 1/2 to the head. -WAY smarter AI. Don't let them either hide or shoot, make them smart (AI in games such as Tarkov or Ready or Not are more like it) -Realistic weapons; i DO NOT want the system we have in Breakpoint, where an M4 can be an 'SMG' or 'DMR' just because it has a different barrel. Make weapon customization more like CoD (I'd prefer Tarkov's version, but that's not to everyone's taste in a game like Ghost Recon) -Realistic ballistic mechanics. Make scopes able to zoom (smoothly, not EITHER 1x OR 12x, but everything in between) and make a sniper able to reach 800-1000m (And the bigger rifles even further), no bullet drop like it's airsoft. -Healing mechanics like in Breakpoint (It's not supposed to be as difficult as Tarkov for example) -Being able to control your AI Squad mates just as in Ready or Not -This time ACTUALLY improve the vehicle mechanics -I like to see the AI use more modern tactics and equipment, so let there be drone surveillance on bigger bases, but NOT as annoying as in Breakpoint. Make it fun and challenging. -Make the missions grittier and harder. The CoD MW2022 first mission (Woman with the trigger in the house) was a good example. Add elements in there the player has to deal with, changing the outcome of the mission because of the choice the player makes. I know everyone has a different take/idea what the next Ghost Recon game 'should' be, this is just my take on what I'd like.
I think that it’s brilliant making the new game 1st person. It’s so much more captivating seeing the world through the characters eyes. The only thing I can see why people like 3rd person is the ability to peak corners and obstacles which for me immediately breaks that captivation. It feels like I’m watching a character instead of being a character
This game will be very cool and epic if the feature is updated by changing first person and manual peek modes. and added a little open scope animation which is a bit realistic. will probably be the TOP 5 best pc game in the world
I’m gonna give this series one more chance, so once again I’m highly anticipating this game. Really all gotta do is make gear matter that alone will raise the bar for this game immensely.
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
Friends, glad to see so many reactions to this video. So I want to address everyone. Let's not be so categorical because of the first insights about the future Ghost Recon game. I still hope that Ubisoft will not be able to just abandon the multi-million audience of loyal fans of the series, who supported Ghost Recon games just because they were third-person games.
So I think there's a huge possibility that a future game will feature an optional camera view switch from first-person to third-person. This practice has been used in recently released games and worked brilliantly. So I don't see any problem to implement it in the future Ghost Recon as well.
Let's believe that it will be a really great project that will attract both new audience and loyal fans of the series. Thank you for being with LugovoisesGames!
Cheers!
You’re right!
No 1st person view = No buy for me (as was for Wildlands and Breakpoint and etc.)
Ghost Recon used to be 1st person, when it was a succes ( Ghost Recon: Island Thunder was my favorite)
They should have 3rd and 1st person view as was allready made possible by modders (for WL and BP)
and then everybody can be happy. It's allready shown that it's possible and available.
If they're smart they still fix it for WL and BP too, then i would buy those games too.
I choose to remain realistic in my expectations. Ubisoft at best is a flawed company and they have not made anything of quality in a long while. The clear choice to not go to the community initially shows they are disinterested in addressing the shortcomings of previous games and the pitfalls of future choices. I hope for the best and prepare for the worst.
I hope the optical camouflage in the next part is not cosmetics. Por favor
i WILL ALWAYS want to have a real and perfect hybrid game of "WHAT IF GHOST RECON MEETS ARMA3?" idea in the next sense:
1. detailed managing of the squad (of lets say 6 men team) to arma spirit
2. giving to the squad leader (gamer) the choose of choosing between 3th person/1st person and even also a "2th person" mixing the best of the 1st and 3th person ones
3. selecting what team members i want in my team per mission by soldier class
4. having 2 maps:
a. one general map of the area of the mission (like in the breakpoint game) (given in paper)
b. and other smaller map for analyzing the current combat point (given via what a predator uav sees)
5. i want back my crosscom of my team members (GRAW AND GRAW2)
It's insane how Ubisoft never hears the community, at the end we are the ones that buy their games.
The ONLY way Ubi listens to the community is through sales numbers and they don't lie. While many successes and some flops happened to 3rd p games, their all time best selling title was an FPS and they generally sell better than 3PS.
This doesn't mean they shouldn't offer a 3rd p option though.
Yeah, you're absolutely right. It's been a mystery to me for a year now, too. Anyway, we'll wait for more insides and news. Hopefully they will give players the option to optionally switch the camera to third-person view😉💪
@@LugovoisesGames Thanks for the great content
@SeanChristOne I agree. But the world is a better place with @LugovoisesGames 3rd person gameplay videos.
I'd never want them to end! They're just too awesome.
If UBI won't give the option, "someone" will ;)
Actually Ubisoft do listen and that’s the problem, everyone was asking for first person and now that it’s happening they are complaining 🤣🤦♂️ you can never please anyone i swear
They just need to make both 3rd and 1st person an option.
Yes! I don't understand why they'd do this unless it's not an open-world anymore.
Luke dayz
They won't
100 percent agreed. 1st person is awesome, but you can never properly appreciate the character skin and graphics like you would in 3rd person. Sth I want in this one is photorealistic graphics, with a more fluid weapon manipulation (similar to unrecord, aka bodycam game), and much more emphasis into story development, and AI development.
If they do this properly, take their time, and really make sth good, like even add a sandbox open-world mode like DMZ but PvE strictly, and have players who finish the campaign carry out ops in this realistic middle-eastern environment, it'd be a best seller. COD is dying right now, especially in the milsim department, so we really really need a decent milsim with photorealistic graphics and decent mechanics and animation.
@@a.c.e7407 ya, id love a co-op/pve extraction mode. More realistic gun handling/ reloads and more realistic shooting sound and healing animations
I hope they offer both options, FPS and TPS. The ghost recon community can keep playing 3rd, and they can pull in FPS fans. I also LOVE the cultural feel of Wildlands. The people, the colors, the language, especially the music. Those elements gave me great escapism. When I hear Latin music in public, I think of Wildlands, then come home and play it, even though I finished the game.
I also hope they give the option to optionally switch the camera view. So that the game will keep loyal Ghost Recon fans who love the third-person view, and also attract those who only recognize the first-person gameplay💪🤝
Let's see. Looking forward to more insights!
@@LugovoisesGames What about the fans from before that when it was a first person shooter?? I like the 3rd person option too, but there are plenty of loyal fans that want a real 1st person version and this sounds like maybe it is. I didn't really get into the last game until the 1st person mod came out, but it's not a good 1st person experience at all. Now it might actually be an amazing open world larp game with immersive and realistic combat. If BP had a RON style of 1pp I would play it non stop.
I don’t see them having both, if they did why didn’t the insider mention first and third person perspective? I ofc want both but don’t see ubisoft doing it
i m literally haunted by the guy in the enemy camp singing "la santa.... LA SAAAANTAAAAA" what a real video game feeling same as the old playstation 2 vibes when you add a mood at the game and people who spend hundreds of hours in knows perfectly the ambiance, windlands make me love bolivia . i hope fps gonna be an option too
Its not that hard to allow both fps and tps. They have done that in other games.
Anyone else still playing breakpoint? I didn’t trip into it until a year ago but I swear i haven’t stopped
What platform
I returned it because the feel on controller is terrible
I just found the entire game franchised existed lmao
I am playing Breakpoint too! I love the game. To hear the next game will be only first person is very disappointing.
I’ve put almost 300 hours in over the last 5 weeks. I’m having a blast.
I hope they offer authentic immersion like real life military equipment and clothing
I love GR Wildlands. I have crawled over every square inch of that world. If I have any complaint, it is my ability (or lack thereof) to retain assets. When I steal a plane or boat or Unidad armored vehicle, I should be able to take it to a Katari rebel base and it remain there and not disappear after I leave. Especially the airplanes, because the map is so huge that a plane is very much needed in order to get around quickly.
Couldn't agree more. I always need a plane or chopper to move across the vast map.
This is possible in breakpoint. I actually prefer breakpoint over wildlands. You might too especially with the motherland add on you have faction wars appending all over and have to conquer territories based on difficulty just like in wildlands.
I’m still playing Ghost Recon since 2019…I love the game but I play realistic…slowly….i map out the area and take out each Bad Guy while not being seen or heard….love it
This is the way 🙌🏻
He says the people don't like the tech part, but if we look the Ukraine war, drones, hacks, electronic war, end a lot os technologies are been used
@@kkkjhjhuv5884yea but it used but people don’t just want to control drones there’s a lot of people fighting on the frontlines it can be done but I don’t think breakpoint did it right with all the tech stuff like the tanks and shit
@@kkkjhjhuv5884 there are as far as i know nothing like behemoth or any of the ground drones being used
Ubisoft dont let us down... Do a 3rd person option... Why we buy skin's and also customize how we like our character.
All they do is let us down
Are you suffering from a concussion or new to gaming?
fr just give costumization options for free ( the good ones ) like cmon...
Someone who gets it
It's useless to buy skins you won't even see
Such a complete waste
Nah 3rd person is not Ghost Recon
@@MrC-55wild lands and Breakpoint sure were….😂
Here Is how I hope it will be... A campaign covering certain regions of the map and finally once its done, opening up a bigger open world with smaller side stories.
Interesting idea, that would be interesting😉🤝
If it’s an open world again, I like this idea. Being completely open from the beginning is too much. I also don’t like gun unlocks spread across the map.
@@CrzBonKerz21 Yeah...I feel like new weapons should be unlocked every few missions with a reason why the weapon will work better in that scenerio and later after the game is done you'll unlock its varients...I want old school storytelling and great A.I characters...We deserve this much
Ubisoft might be taking it back to how Ghost Recon originally was, a blend of modern and OG ghost recon gameplay
You really believe that after all they have been doing for years?!?!
In that case I have a bridge to sell you as you are so smart hahahahaha
I really wish they would.I wouldn't think twice about buying it.The very first ghost recon and it's add on were the best multiplayer game. I personally think it would give COD A run for its money. Having your own server being able to set the amount of respawns so it forced you to play. Run and gun and camp with your last couple response.
I hope so I grew up playing desert siege, island thunder, and jungle warfare
@@Brent0285 best game ever
3rd Person is a must!!!
Here's the thing, you either have a very polished first person with a bit clunky or unpolished third person and vice versa or you have both that are mediocre, can't really have both that are extremely fluid and polished.
@@zedus4042I think it's cool they're going back to their roots as an FPS title. Though I have played the newer ones and grown accustomed to both styles, FPS and TPS..
Yup
Why is 3rd person so important? I don’t need it as I spend more time aiming down the sights anyway.
@@vakonightsbane9044it’s better because you can choose to aim with sights or off shoulder and you can actually see your outfit in 3rd person
Well, I'm annoyed now. I really thought they'd do a Breakpoint with a better story and a more lived-in world like Wildlands'. Really disappointing.
Ubisoft: what do you guys want?
Us: 3rd person, non looter shooter with tactical gameplay and milsim scenarios
Ubisoft: alright 1st person it is!
3rd person ISN'T tactically OR milsim accurate - IRL you can't astral plane above and outside yourself to check out the enemy from behind cover... I have NO problem with both perspectives being offered - a concession to choice that 3rd person fanbois generally won't accept.
OG Ghost Recon was FPS!
LOVE IT, going back to its roots.
1000%
I've been waiting for the remaster for 20 years
Look..I’ve grown really attached to Nomad. I think they should incorporate him/her in the new game. All of these games, both Wildlands and Breakpoint were IMHO great! Even after they developed DLC and other story modes..I say we give them a chance and see where they take it, and if they are willing to listen to their fan base.
You have? I barely see a personality from him or character development. He just seems like a template tough soldier guy.
@@Exotic-_ that’s my point. He’s a tough guy. You have to be when you’ve been shot down several times, hunted, lost your closest friends and then have to kill someone who used to be you service brother (I served IRL…I couldn’t imagine) He has to be cold, and they let you select dialog like Elder Scrolls did in their games which is dope.
Its crazy how everyone talks about wildlands like it's a god tier game now😅 when wildlands released and for sometime after, everyone was calling it trash and heavily criticized it at every corner🤷 oh but now all that complaining got us to where we are now and these games are touted as ideal....Maaaan. perfect example to just enjoy the games, be supportive and hopefully they will innovative the series correctly because when they try to yall just complain ✅
I’ve played Ghost Recon since the original, I actually welcome back the sole first person element. Looks awesome!
I can't believe they decided to drop the third person perspective! Ubisoft is once again ignoring the community! I'm disappointed. Hopefully the game will have an option to switch to third person view.
Thanks for the detailed review, man. And congrats to the winner of the giveaway!
I share your frustration. However, maybe they will still add the ability to optionally switch the camera to third-person view! Looking forward to more insights😉
I dont share his frustration. Keep it thrid person. Period. Full stop. End of discussion.
@SeanChristOne fortnight is horrible. Please don't make me play it. Peace.
I am glad they got rid off third person, it was terrible. OG ghost recons were FP and I am glad they LISTENED to community and implementing first person mode. Going back to roots!
Dude you know the first ghost recon was first person right???
I've been playing Ground Branch a lot, and that game is the epitome of shooting. And if the next Ghost Recon is able to deliver 50% of GB gunplay while having a story and various missions, I'm all in.
So I’m actually excited about the fps variant of ghost recon, assuming that this is true taking a team of 4 and essentially having a tactical shooter game would sound fun
Very good breakdown. Ubi is ubi. Let's not raise expectations too high. lol
"Ubi is ubi" is spot on! I couldn't have said it better. Well, I think either it will be a complete failure or we'll get something new and unique in the milsim first-person shooter genre. We'll see😉
They always down grade everything...
Yeah, like other RUclipsr said in his other video, what makes me hate Ubisoft is that they don’t always make bad games, sometimes they nail it, like on Wildlands, so we never lose hope on them lol
Ghost recon was originally first person way back in the day on pc.i think if they kept it open world with a survival aspect and realism it would be great but also have a 3rd person option
I truly doubt that because they don’t care about their fan base
@@jacksongoodman3625 sadly true
first person is amazing. no more ghost peeking and making it an actual tactical shooter. almost nothing about wild lands and break point were tactical and realistic, and hopefully they really bring back their roots.
I am ultra excited for Ghost Recon in first person. Honestly, I never liked third person cameras in games, especially immersive games like GR, so I always played with those FP mods, but now, it is going to be a huge thing.
totally agreed bro
Yep - I was a GR player from release of the very first game - but they lost me with 3rd person - or more precisely going to 3rd person with no 1st person option.
I like fps way better too. 3rd person games where you can't ads I can't play at all.
GR began as a tactical semi-open-world squad-based first person shooter. Feels like a return to form.
Sounds similar to the og ghost recon with it being first person squad management. Honestly I haven’t played much of the first one but it would definitely be interesting. Sounds like possibly Ghost Recon and Splinter Cell are going back to their roots
You have to remember the first Ghost Recon games were first person. I'm super down for them to go back to first person view, and this is a really good time for Ubisoft to come back on top with the Tom Clancy franchise by making them mil sim (in their respective genres) especially with how popular it's becoming now a days. The original Clancy games were all technically realistic games for it's time. I'd love to see Rainbow Six fall back to it's former glory as well, and I'm super excited for the Splinter Cell remake.
I won't buy it unless there's a 3rd person option.
Other way around for me lol
I like how the series is going back to its roots.
Ikr!! Should give the option. Hate that first person shit
Kinda like how you can play fallout 4 in first of third
I won’t buy it if it’s first person only.
The first person just really broke my heart Ubisoft PLEASE BE DIFFERENT 😭
Ghost recon first came out at tactical fps it was dope games
And it being an FPS didn't make it dope,it was the uniquenes.@@tannerbottineau62
It’s wild to see how many people are vehemently opposed to it being a modern take on the original formula, but then turn around and say they’ve never played it. Like ask long time series veterans and most consider the first game to be the best.
I just want them to add the UH-60 blackhawk and wildlands vehicle physics😭
People don't seem to realize GR started as a FPS game. I'm down for getting back in the roots
right!? All these clowns talking about how they love all the realism, yet they whine about how it just HAS to be in third-person... see the problem there?
You really think they can make a game as good as them again?!?!?!
M8 it's GOOBISOFT ARE YOU DUMB?!!!
They haven't released anything but trash for years now and are ACTIVELY STEALING our games
People don't realise that isn't the same Ubisoft, they cared back then and respected our time and money
Now they hate us, don't listen to us and just try to rob us and milk is dry
You aren't going to like driving the vehicles in fp
Please, please, I would buy it instantly if they went back to their roots. Ghost.Recon was one of the best FPS,s ever made
@@darrylpoirier buy it for us too because we won't, we'll just play cod
By putting it in first person they're pretty much getting rid of a lot of mechanics including the cover system
Cover system could be third person like Rainbow Six Vegas or even Deus Ex
@coreycasciano3255 it still wouldn't be ghost recon, if you look at old ghost recon they had core mechanics for the AI like if your AI teammates get killed they stay dead until the mission is over then you got new replacement AI teammates the list goes on for what ghost recon is beside first person, third person has more valuable mechanics than first person
And that is good. It is much closer to a milsim game such as ARMA.
@@bradleymoreland62 I mean I get how 3rd person would cater to a larger market but OG rainbow six and ghost recon both had great ia and squad order systems while first person. Planning missions was the shit. It be cool if it got like ready or not level of immersion
@tannerbottineau62 it would also be nice if they would have a selection at the beginning of the game for first or third person.
Hell they can remake wildlands with the breakpoint mechanics and I'd be happy with that
We need a third person mode! Please 🙏!
Don't beg them.. recon should always be a Default, and 1st person optional.
@@Korupt81 i don't care, i won't buy it, that's all.. 😂
@krisztiannagy8983 Won't matter to them. If you don't buy that's solely on you. For every 1 person that doesn't buy, there are 100 others that will recover the cost that you didn't. Also, the naysayers right now who loved 3rd person may want to re-examine themseleves. GR used to be a strict FPS only, and then the newer ones came out that were 3rd person, and some liked the evolution. (I didn't), but many others did. I am sure the same will happen if this is an FPS only. However, they may decide to do a 3rd person mode option as well. I've never seen a GR have a 1st and 3rd person option by default. It's always been strict, one view or the other. It will be interesting to see what happens. Don't put the cart before the horse!
So, I love how Ghost recon has handled the balance of 3rd and 1st person gameplay in Wildlands and Break Point, but I’ve also been playing since the original Ghost Recon came out and originally the Ghost Recon series was only 1st person and it was pretty much the only tactical no nonsense first person shooter at the time. It sounds like they are returning to their roots.
Ain't that captain price on the thumbnail😂😂
I remember when it was a fps with no weapons showing just a reticle its came a long way but I agree with the option to have both fps and tps options
I just hope the game doesn't feel "empty" Just make the missions fun and feel rewarding.
1st person is great for the milsim immersion. 3rd person is great for looking at how cool your character looks with all the cool branded gear they put in the game!
If there's no 3rd person option it will be Call of Duty a shame. Ghost Recon is a great game series been playing since Future Soldier it's sort of in it's own league really in my opinion. I hope they add in the option to switch between 1st and 3rd person perspective, fingers crossed.
I hear you, man! We're all hoping for a mix of TPS and FPS in the new Ghost Recon.
I loved future soldier. Been playing since ghost recon first came out on ps2. Love the series I don’t really care if it’s 1st or 3rd I just want it to be good
Why is everyone so upset with GR getting a first person title? It started out as such from what I've seen and did it well. There has been a few third titles since then with the last fps title being 2007 I think. If they decide to do both views they should make them both great instead of do both not well. But with just 1 option (FPS), they can perfect it. Also, just because a game is an FPS, doesn't mean it's like COD, it is just perspective
I'm sure they'll manage a way to fuck it up
no third person no thanks, Third person is what made Wildlands and Breakpoint so great
hoping the devs are paying close attention to the community and picks up on what we want and what we are willing to pay for
Breakpoint was too repetitive, each level felt like the same exact thing over and over again
Can't argue with that. However, we still love this game😁😌
After you beat it everything it gets repetitive
@@LugovoisesGamesi don’t. That shit shouldnt ne named ghost recon. Same with Wildlands, cause they arent ghost recons
@@xSoulhunterDKx agreed, found wildlands more fun than BP, but the fully open world kinda ruined the experience
Personally I love the third person shooter that’s what makes it a great game.
First person perspective adds another level of realism to the game which is what UBI are going for, a more realistic experience. The older games were first person anyway (depending on which version of the game you played)
I think it would be cool to be able to switch from 1st person to 3rd person
We just need an updated breakpoint in a different setting with a little better graphics. Don’t over think it.
I would be fine with more dlc content for breakpoint.. I’ve been to every base so many times I just need a new open world
Im pretty excited to see how they make the first person view of the game, if it plays like Ready or Not then I think it will do well.
Im sure there will be great improvements in 'OVER', but for me bro..no way am i going back to 1st person shooter, i just dont like the view..its too limited ! I've years of entertainment to keep me going, GR wildlands & breakpoint, Sniper Elite 4 & 5, and God of War( not played it yet lol) each to there own bro, im sure plenty of folk like that kind of set up, i will just crack on with what i have😉, rest easy bro,have a good week,happy hunting👊
Man, let's not jump to conclusions about the new Ghost Recon just yet. I still hope they don't allow themselves to completely ignore the series' fan base of millions, who have grown so fond of the game over the past decade precisely because of its third-person playability. Maybe they'll make it optional to switch the camera to both first-person and third-person view. Like it was implemented in the recently released Starfield. Let's believe in the best and wait for more insights. I will keep you updated!
You have a good week too, brother!😉🤝😌
@@LugovoisesGames Bro, i am optimistic, i hope they give a TP option, then i will be interested, but if its going to go FP only, that would kill it for me !
A lot can happen in a year, my play is starting to get a little better, im not getting killed so much, im currently working on Episode 1, im now 225hrs of play, soon ads up 🥵🤣, catch up later bro its 04:07hrs here..im just up, 1st coffee😉🫡
My 1st GR game was GRAW2, but the 1st person PC port and I absolutely fell in love with it. After that, I played Future Soldier, Wildlands & Breakpoint, and I really enjoyed the experiences each one gave (expect Breakpoint at launch with the bullshit RPG elements).
So for me, I don't really care for the camera perspective. As long as the game is grounded, gritty & immersive, with no robots.
Give us the option to choose, please Ubisoft🙏
For me, the best option for everyone to be happy, is to give players option to play in 1st person mode or 3rd person mode, just by using one key. Sth like in PC version of GTA V. And also in my opinion, they should change hiding mechanism into GTA system. Using keybind to stick to the wall, or hide behind obstacle is more precise for me.
Absolutely agree with you! That would be the perfect thing to do😉🤝
Yea and have real modern day military gear and clothes etc…
No Third Person Options Choice Forget it. I'm Big fan of GHOST Recon especially wildlands and Mercenaries Playground of destruction,
The Saboteur, Just Cause, Grand Theft Auto 4,5,6,
if Any Ubisoft Ghost Recon iPs Removes Third Person Options in their Future Game's just Like the New Ghost Recon Over then that's definitely Deal Breaker... And if they refuse to Add Third Person Choice Options in Near future then no not interested. Same said for 8 or 9 Casual Fan's Gamer's play online with none of them saying their interested in this NEW Ubisoft mistake make in Next Ghost recon over New iP.
I think being focused on 1st person will make it fresh since there's a lack of realistic shooters outside from the indie scene.
Yeah, that's what I think too! I think they want to combine the best of Modern Warfare and smaller games like Ready or Not and Insurgency Sandstorm into this game. It might be something new in the milsim shooter genre!💪
@@LugovoisesGames I'm hoping for that!
you hit the nail on the head regarding everything you said. surely they cant mess this up, they just need to give us wildlands but in vietnam.
hi. am an old fan of recon series (literally), and first ever cod or far cry as well. my humble opinion is not popular maybe but...some of us just love both game styles, depending on mood and fight scenario. me love 3pers view, animations, gear details much. some days just wanna walk and explore first. prepare for attack. for this 3view is more emmersive for me and visually reacher. but when it comes to fight, especially in cqb I simply move like a dog in da fog. in far cry style i am moving fast and deadly. here I die often because my camera flyes where i dont expect it to be, or animation does flips and its over. its more natural looking through my eyes and fight. so ideal would be - as they do with other options - to leave a user his choice. 😊 peace.
I too think Ubisoft should just let players choose which camera view to play with, first or third person. It would be a perfect compromise for both the players and the studio itself. After all, this way they will attract a new audience and will not lose the loyal fans of the series of recent years.
I have played GR since 2004, I think thats when it first appeared. I enjoy the milsim 1st person perspective as it relates to real world situations. For myself, third person gives me a “cheat” perspective of what is around a corner, one that is not available to an eyes only perspective. One has to rely on sound and anticipation more with the original fps style. It makes me a better player as it makes me work harder, but at the same time I can directly relate to lines of sight etc… .
I feel individuals like myself need the ultra realism of realtime 1st person perspectives, and the newer generation of human needs their 3rd person. Either way, it sounds like a great experience that Ubisoft is preparing for us. I of course will not rely on boycotting if I don’t get my version. But the old Ghost Recon definitely ups the realism, and will be a blast I’m sure.
Prob won’t transition if it’s FPS only but thank you for the solid intel
Always happy to be helpful. Well, I don't think we should jump to conclusions just yet. Let's wait for new insights, maybe the game will make it possible to optionally switch the camera to third-person view😉
I cannot wait for the terminators to come on the battlezone
This game is only for the gamer wizards
Ghost recon needs to be a 3rd person shooter!! That or be able to switch between the two. Sad to say it but if they lock it into first person I won’t be buying it. Ubisoft if you want a first person shooter make a new title don’t try and slap it into a game franchise like Ghost Recon.
Ghost recon first started as a fps lol
Ghost Recon started as an FPS, it only went third person later in the advanced warfare era.
So basically a Far Cry, an open world, first person shooter but tactical with a grounded and gritty tone of Modern Warfare.
Hell f*cking yeah.
Though it is gonna be made by Ubisoft so I don't really know what to expect from their perspective on "gritty" as Ubisoft is woke, sensitive and goofy as fuck in their recent games which is a hard no for this type of game.
Also, how can people hate that it's gonna be first person, that's what excites me the most by far. You can't get more immersive than having a well made first person perspective.
I think going to 1st person shooter will take away from character building. It will be nice if they left 3rd Person view as an option.
Can’t wait for it! been playing breakpoint since release so much versatility in it, ubi cant please everybody but everyone should be grateful ❤️
If its first person, I will never buy it,,,,
Never... what??😂
@@jansmit327 made big mistake, now it looks weird 😁
@@jansmit327 now you happy? 😁
Don't jump to conclusions. Maybe they'll add an optional ability to switch the camera to third-person view😉
At least there Better be some Better driving mechanics
So IF its FPS only then all the character customisation with everything goes out the window.How lame Ubi if you,re going to cut this huge corner.This is what us GR fans want and we don,t just want to see an end of a gun swaying around.
IF they make it switchable then it will be great.Hoping also we can still have a open world to play and not just some mission based area then finish (like the ridiculously short COD games)
Ubisoft think about your hardcore GR fanbase because guaranteed you will lose a massive amount of them.
Your review definitely needs to be shown to Ubisoft. I agree with every word of it. You know, I still hope and believe that they will give us the ability to optionally switch the camera to third-person view like they implemented in the recently released Starfield. Therefore, I don't see a problem to do the same in Ghost Recon. Especially considering the fact that this series has been positioned as a third-person game for over 10 years now. You can't just pick up and spit on Ghost Recon's fan base of millions.
Do you think I'm being overly optimistic?😅
Hope springs last. Let's wait for more insights😉🤝
Omg hearing first person was like a breath of fresh air. Finally!
If they pull out 3rd person , I’m out this franchise.
Good riddance
womp womp no one cares😂
@@s9tiva you cared enough to respond fool ! 🤣
I care @@s9tiva
Hope they put third person are at least a option to switch
Wildlands strategic system and difficulty.. and re work the physics and update the melee combat from.breakpoint.. add gore... some pure controversial scenes similar to mentioned.. deep story that has you making delicious that would haunt you.. lesser of two evils kinda choice. Third person open world.. and make it live service.. so that after a year or two.. you can add an edition that beings you to a new location with a complete new story.
Ubisof va ha volver a meter la pata haciendo un juego en primera persona rompiendo la saga ,no escucha la comunidad y después vienen las madres mias pk no venden ,es un error debieran de hacerlo en tercera persona y para usar armas si te conviene utilizar la primera persona ,se van ha cargar una saga como es Ghost recon ,es mi humilde opinión y como usuario y jugador de esta saga ,creo que si la comunidad hacemos presión ubisof puede hacer un buen juego y no una copia de call of duty
Sí, por desgracia esta decisión rompe por completo la ideología de Ghost Recon de los últimos años a la que nos hemos acostumbrado y hemos llegado a amar. Sin embargo, creo que definitivamente no será una copia de Call of Duty. Creo que quieren combinar en este juego lo mejor de Modern Warfare y de juegos pequeños como Ready or Not e Insurgency Sandstorm. Esperemos a conocer más detalles😉
La comunidad podríamos presionar a ubisof para que desarrolle el juego en tercera persona y opcional poder jugar en primera persona ,creo que recogiendo firmas y mandarlo a los estudios ubisof nos podrían hacer caso a la comunidad ,es una opinión ,podríamos hacerlo una recogida masiva de firmas de toda la comunidad a nivel mundial ,sería la ostia
fps would make the game so much better 3rd person sucks!! But they should have both views in the game then everyone is happy
Va a salir solo en 1 persona ??? Que porqueria la verdad
Lo que sabemos hasta ahora es que Ubisoft está posicionando el juego como un shooter en primera persona. Esperemos que permitan incluir opcionalmente una vista en tercera persona.
1st person is so popular because it puts them in the scenario and mimics more realistic feel to tactical shooters makes you connect with the character 3rd person lets you make decisions based off thing you would never actually see by abusing camera angles
great points man
Exactly
All the whining because you can't abuse camera angles while in 3rd person is astounding up in here. Glad to see it going back to a FPS...
Is it gonna be woke?
Love the 1st person. No more bs mod management for 2 hours
No 3rd person, no buy
Ubisoft will just end up turning it into a generic forgettable FPS, and us console players will back to having 0 tactical shooters yaaaay
Entitled much? The Original was First Person and was the best! Waa waaa it doesn't come with a feature you don't want so you won't buy. You are the epitome of an entitled millennial. Grow up! You were born probBly in late or early 2000s, weren't you? You have no idea what tactical means do you?
Stop being an entitled bratt. Just because it doesn't come with a feature you don't like, you won't buy.... The very first Ghost Recon was First Person, and it was the GOAT! Were you born in the early or late 2000's?
I know what you mean. I too was initially shocked by the news. However, I'm believing the best for now and hoping that players will be given the optional ability to switch to third-person view. We'll see...😉
Ooo first person is music to my ears. Sounds like it's going back to its roots
they gonna lose alot of fans tryna make it more like call of duty, no 3rd person view is a waste.
I hope there are realistic elements such as crack sound from glass give away to enemies... the birds in the jungle suddenly fly off... the foot prints in the mud, sand or in the snow... and much more that you can think of...adding environmental destruction also is very nice... and please make it available both offline and online
Lets See how it will be. I hope it's become more realistic and the story could be better. Aka the cutscences were so robotic and unnatural. I'm not a big fan of Ubisoft anyway, so it was kinda predictable.
We'll see about that, buddy! I think they want to combine the best of Modern Warfare and smaller games like Ready or Not and Insurgency Sandstorm into this game - make a cool story with an emphasis on hard realism. This could be something new in the milsim shooter genre! At least, I really want to believe that😁💪
@@LugovoisesGames let's put the hope's high, right?
Also a big thanks for your hard work, your opinion and that u respons to your community❤️🙌
Finally a first person ghost recon man.
First a battle royale, now this. Ubisoft doing everything *but* give us Ghost Recon.
sadddd but true .... FPS no 3rd person , SHAME !
I am very exciting ghost recon is going back to its original roots as a FPS. I am a huge fan of the Ghost Recon games and I am not disappointed at all.
Even though I loved Ghost Recon as a third person shooter I feel like this will give New Life to the franchise. Can't wait!
If they switch to first person view I’m done
If thats the case, me too Bro !
At least they should give the player the choice of switching to First Person, or to third Person.
But If they make IT that way i think they loose a big big Fan/Player Base
Not only that, as it would be okay if it was just an option, however they need to lose this online live service shyte. Relying on Ubisoft servers in order to be able to play is complete bullshit. Still play Wildlands to this day as I consider it to be superior to Breakpoint on so many levels. Breakpoint was just a lush map with no activity. Literally a huge map of collecting flowers lol.
Waaaaaaa waaaaaaa
@@Gandalf_the_handsome It’s Wah wah not waaaa waaaa ya dummy 😂 you tried to troll on my comment and made yourself look like a fool
I really hope that we either get to see nomad return or that we get to see what happened between the end of wildlands and the beginning of breakpoint aside from just flashbacks.
First person = no buy. Is ubisoft fuct
Don't jump to conclusions. Maybe they'll add an optional ability to switch the camera to third-person view😉
@@LugovoisesGames let's hope so, I can't see them not incorporating 3rd person
I have never been into shooters, however, a couple years ago I got ghost recon: breakpoint, and I still play that game quite often (it followed my jump from xbox to pc). personally, I like wandering the world in third person, but then I always had my aiming settings down the iron sights. I prefer shooting from the sights of the actual gun. I don't know what to expect. From what I've seen in the gaming industry as a whole, the major game developers haven't really been listening to their fan bases and going the way of what games look best for advertisers. I'll treat the new game the same way I treated the newest Forza game, I'll wait for it to have been released for a couple of months for evaluating
Naw keep it 3rd person
Breakpoint first person looks good more roleplay
I believe the concept of first-person shooter a very good concept because that is real I don't know about you but when I think of a gunfight I don't think of a camera over my shoulder me looking through it I think of me using my eyeballs however I do hope the game stays open world because mission-oriented is nice but sometimes it's more comfortable and challenging with an open world cuz then you have multiple outcomes multiple choices and that is war multiplayer and negative outcomes at least in a game setting
Awesome gameplay bro❤❤❤😊😮😮😮😢😢
Thanks, man! It's a pleasure😌😉
GR wildlands was freaking awesome. The perfect sized map, weapon mechanics everything was almost perfect. Breakpoint on the other hand I did like the solo taking out the camps and everything. the new stealth mechanics and vehicles. Graphics were top notch but idk something about the gameplay was missing. It didn't feel like a ghost recon game. Enemies would spot you from afar even tho you were hiding.it was ridiculous. I hope this one feels like wildlands.
Breakpoint became a problem when I ran out of ammo and wanted to use a dead enemy's weapon to stay in the fight. They didn't drop weapons when the game released because they wanted you to loot chests and boxes for gear with levels.
They fixed the game by removing that part entirely. Breakpoint now played like Wildlands and its great. But I still love Wildlands.
I think it’s a step in the right direction considering how there were rumors that it was gonna be a battle royale. On one hand, I think they shouldn’t take away from the identity of it being a third person franchise. I would like an option for fps though, I suppose. Ever since I went into the military and actually learned how to shoot guns, M.O.U.T., land nav, small squad tactics and the lot I would like to immerse myself in a bit of FPS. I think if it has any sort of openness with sizable maps so you can approach how you would like (I envision what MGS V Phantom Pain type of game play) it could be nice as opposed to a linear map like they had in GRFS (still a great game though).
While I like Wildlands and to a lesser degree Breakpoint I still think they had their issues. Wildlands felt great but the voice acting was weird in some spots, like when they said “class a uniform“ it just felt off with the tone they used (a small nitpick), the story was great but it seemed overwhelming to literally go pick any operation of El Sueño’s. They also said if you tackled the security portion of the operation it would lead to lesser amounts of personnel in other missions and areas but it didn’t really seem like it. The time line seemed off, Kozak wasn’t apart of the ghosts yet in a dlc but they referenced him getting a divorce in some side chatter in the core game. If Kozak was apart of the unit, where was the camo from GRFS in the core game? Why was Nomad a major, I can see a captain being boots on ground but that’s the highest point an officer should be to leading a small fire team like that if at all really (my own opinion on the matter, idk how spec ops handles manning lol). When they did finally put in active camo, it was merely cosmetic and the enemy knew you were there 😂 Other than a few relatively small things great game. It had a great crossover with The Predator, the weapon selection was phenomenal (although I hate that the m60 was behind those stupid loot crates), the weapons used the actual ammunition, there were plenty of npcs in every biome just about (I’m spacing on the snow biome right now) the side chatter from your squad felt real.
Now Breakpoint starts off terribly because Weaver gets killed by Walker like 5 mins into the game, that first couple updates from my account you were straight up solo, like hasn’t the game been squad based for years?? I can think of a couple of missions in GRAW 2 and GRFS where you’re solo but it wasn’t the whole game. The weapons were pretty limited at first and they all used a bastardized ammo type. Like of course the M4’s and AK47 used 5.56 and 7.62 respectively but my 5.7 and P90 took 5.56 the Tac-50 took .338 (I think every .50 did too) there was zero distinction with 7.62x39, 7.62x51 or 7.62x54 unlike in Wildlands which used different calibers which led to some pretty weird loadout situations that I had to keep in mind not to use my favorite 5.7 if I had any M4/AR platform since they used the same round in game. The gear level introduction was needless imo, I felt like it was trying to be more like The Division. The Rainbow Six and Terminator crossovers were kinda sub par if you ask me. The survival aspect was an interesting concept but I don’t think I ever really used it. The world was super underpopulated, I thought people were supposed to be trapped on the island but I think there was less than 250 noncombatants on the map. Dumbed down helicopter controls were so annoying, in Wildlands I could dodge and weave from AA fire but if any AA sees you in Breakpoint you’re done. There were good things though. They finally gave us squad members (albeit rather quiet ones), the third installment where they added the Bodark story was peak in my opinion and the rewards were amazing too like the functioning active camo that you can use in the regular game mode too, the ability to turn off the aerial surveillance drones (always turned it off after I destroyed the manufacturing plant in the core game, it was written into the Bodark story mode) the customization was pretty good (I do wish you could pick which part of a gun you could pick to paint more specifically, like when I used gold on an AK it would paint over the wooden stock but not the hand guard, a small complaint honestly)
So I guess what I’d like to see from a next installment of the series is I guess semi open maps on a mission to mission basis like MGS V PP was, a system where you can command your squad like in GRAW 2 GRFS, set in a world after GRFS with Bodark and active camo with an option for FPS, I’d like it to have the roll mechanic back in the game. I’d like to have a GRFS type multiplayer system too if possible. Oh, if they do decide to go the MGS V route, we should be able to go back to maps and be able to explore more of those areas, there should be a base camp you could walk around and maybe even upgrade too like a specially purposed aircraft carrier. I also miss the M.U.L.E. from GRAW 2 so I’d really like drone type squad members or something like the Boston Dynamic pack carrier. Shoooooooot while we’re at it, make a tachikoma companion like from Ghost in the Shell lol
All I know is I’m cautiously optimistic about this new game, I’ve been a fan for almost 2 decades now. So here’s hoping lol 🤞🏻🤞🏻🤞🏻
As a big fan of the Ghost Recon series myself, I'd be happy to see the next game as a tactical first person game, but in the open world setting of Wildlands. I prefer the tactical first person experience from the older games (Have modded GR Breakpoint to be just that), but loved the open world setting of Bolivia in Wildlands, with all the randomness that came with it.. Made it feel alive.
Breakpoint was a big step down from Wildlands, with the AI being boring as h#ll, just repeating the same 5 lines over and over again (And being WAY to loud)
Things I'd like to see:
-Open world setting like Wildlands
-A more alive world like in Wildlands. Loved the vibe of that game
-The full control of how to approach missions like in Wildlands, with me (the player) being able to choose stealth or full force fights.
-First person (With the option to switch to 3rd person for the people who like that)
-The World Parameters from Breakpoint, so i can customize the gameplay experience I'd like, BUT with an EXTRA 'Hardcore' mode, where the bots don't go all invincible when they spot you, but are always 2/3 to the chest (Depending in range, caliber and ammo) and 1/2 to the head.
-WAY smarter AI. Don't let them either hide or shoot, make them smart (AI in games such as Tarkov or Ready or Not are more like it)
-Realistic weapons; i DO NOT want the system we have in Breakpoint, where an M4 can be an 'SMG' or 'DMR' just because it has a different barrel. Make weapon customization more like CoD (I'd prefer Tarkov's version, but that's not to everyone's taste in a game like Ghost Recon)
-Realistic ballistic mechanics. Make scopes able to zoom (smoothly, not EITHER 1x OR 12x, but everything in between) and make a sniper able to reach 800-1000m (And the bigger rifles even further), no bullet drop like it's airsoft.
-Healing mechanics like in Breakpoint (It's not supposed to be as difficult as Tarkov for example)
-Being able to control your AI Squad mates just as in Ready or Not
-This time ACTUALLY improve the vehicle mechanics
-I like to see the AI use more modern tactics and equipment, so let there be drone surveillance on bigger bases, but NOT as annoying as in Breakpoint. Make it fun and challenging.
-Make the missions grittier and harder. The CoD MW2022 first mission (Woman with the trigger in the house) was a good example. Add elements in there the player has to deal with, changing the outcome of the mission because of the choice the player makes.
I know everyone has a different take/idea what the next Ghost Recon game 'should' be, this is just my take on what I'd like.
I think that it’s brilliant making the new game 1st person. It’s so much more captivating seeing the world through the characters eyes. The only thing I can see why people like 3rd person is the ability to peak corners and obstacles which for me immediately breaks that captivation. It feels like I’m watching a character instead of being a character
I loved wildlands for its 3rd person shooting with options for aiming in 1st person view. Just 1st and no options would be disappointing
Nothing wrong with 3rd person. The games just need more DEPTH for the RECON part of the game. Its too arcadey at the moment
Ghost recon on first person!!🤩🤩🤩🤩 omg!!
The best experience for this game!
This game will be very cool and epic if the feature is updated by changing first person and manual peek modes. and added a little open scope animation which is a bit realistic. will probably be the TOP 5 best pc game in the world
Why the AI for the voiceover?
Hey, man. Due to my poor English and inability to record a proper voiceover, I have to resort to using AI.
I’m gonna give this series one more chance, so once again I’m highly anticipating this game. Really all gotta do is make gear matter that alone will raise the bar for this game immensely.