I had a stay at home mum, she was tired and stressed out, angry and emotionally unavailable to her kids. Once we left home she got a job and became a different person. Yes she was always there in person, but the past wasn’t always so great.
This is another reason for Australian's to vote for the freedom parties, independents, A.C.P and One Nation. Put the lib, lab, greens and teals last on the ballot paper or not at all. It's time to push back and change the balance of power.
Joel, the Gov overreach is the overall problem, along with the deliberate introduction of Technology in Schools. Every Child will have a laptop. Remember that? Since then, Children are not developing the basic learning skills of reading & writing & the basic social skills & knowledge of Arts & Culture. Children are being programmed for an unsustainable digitalised future. The Gov funds the Technology driven way of life. Eliminating the family Connections of nurturing & protecting the basics. What are the basics: Commonsense Intuition Question everything Develop critical thinking Protect Free speech Australians, did not Consent to a Digital ID.
if websites are using algorithms to pick up certain words for advertising or for banning speech....then it would be relatively easy for algorithms to pick up adult written speech.....an adult constructs sentences somewhat differently to a child....words are different, colloquialisms are different etc. Even if a less educated adult were to use a sentence, then certain words would be picked up because children don't use them. So, not being a code writer I would assume that would be easy enough to do, even if it were peer to peer written speech about certain issues?
Is everybody on the panel, Joel included, missing the point? This U16's law has nothing to do with protecting U16's. It's about coralling everybody into a digital prison.
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
Good people break bad laws.
I had a stay at home mum, she was tired and stressed out, angry and emotionally unavailable to her kids. Once we left home she got a job and became a different person. Yes she was always there in person, but the past wasn’t always so great.
It's a trojan horse for compulsory digital id, which is the first step towards social credit scores and cashless control for banks and government.
dont vote for the uni party period
The woman in green gets her knowledge and directions from an ,,,actor ,,,someone who pretends for a living.
This is another reason for Australian's to vote for the freedom parties, independents, A.C.P and One Nation.
Put the lib, lab, greens and teals last on the ballot paper or not at all.
It's time to push back and change the balance of power.
I don't think you understand or maybe you do, NONE of these parties put the Australian people first. This flag is what they prioritise ✡
People tend too be like sheep, it is difficult to break away from old traditions, which was, is handed down by parents.
@Makeaustraliagreatagain-h8u It painful to watch, I know it took me 10 years to break the uniparty hold .
@briananderson7285 I actually woke up before say Pauline hanson came too light ! When my old man tried too tell me who too vote for !
The only reason they want this is for digital id
Propaganda in schools probably
Joel, the Gov overreach is the overall problem, along with the deliberate introduction of Technology in Schools.
Every Child will have a laptop. Remember that?
Since then, Children are not developing the basic learning skills of reading & writing & the basic social skills & knowledge of Arts & Culture.
Children are being programmed for an unsustainable digitalised future.
The Gov funds the Technology driven way of life. Eliminating the family Connections of nurturing & protecting the basics.
What are the basics:
Commonsense
Intuition
Question everything Develop critical thinking
Protect Free speech
Australians, did not Consent to a Digital ID.
They won't.
Exactly, they don't engage, they dictate.
if websites are using algorithms to pick up certain words for advertising or for banning speech....then it would be relatively easy for algorithms to pick up adult written speech.....an adult constructs sentences somewhat differently to a child....words are different, colloquialisms are different etc. Even if a less educated adult were to use a sentence, then certain words would be picked up because children don't use them. So, not being a code writer I would assume that would be easy enough to do, even if it were peer to peer written speech about certain issues?
Is everybody on the panel, Joel included, missing the point? This U16's law has nothing to do with protecting U16's. It's about coralling everybody into a digital prison.
@Spacewolf01 It almost like their afraid to see the obvious.
@briananderson7285 Yes, absolutely. So very frustrating.
Yes, "my son in-law and his wife" is odd.
Like weird
Write a letter ......if you're can write