I have been gambling for 25 years and am amazed how rare it has been to see players focus on what is the most important aspect of gambling, money mgmnt, specifically, controlling losses.
I play this with a unit progression method for a loss: 1u, 2u, 3u, 5u, 8u, 13u… etc. and when you win you can drop two steps back; ie: win 13u bet 5u, win 5u bet 2u. I like playing this way personally, but maybe it’s because I just haven’t hit an unlucky streak on four deck blackjack yet.
I have done it before actually how I learned to play. I would do that and watch what other people did at the table. I can tell you one thing for sure. Not too many people at the table were thrilled with me playing like that. I did think it was a good way to learn though. Definitely a lot more fun playing now knowing how to play right
You have 14, dealer has a 10 up. No bust says stay, basic says hit and a positive count in the decks agree with no bust and say to stay. Hitting 14 you have about a 56% chance of busting. The dealer w 10 up will bust about 20% of the time.
When I was first learning Blackjack, I tried no bust a little. I very quickly learned that basic strategy was much more consistent and more profitable for me. Yes, winning is fun.
You give the house an extra 4% edge mister "winning". I think in the past 5 months the few people I've seen do it only one won because he was on a lucky streak. Everyone else got absolutely crushed.
After experiencing a pattern I've just a few losses I would have bet it in 2 different are 3 different sections within the same round because I think that would have threw off the shoe to go in his favor
I usually do very well at blackJack however when the dealer is showing an A or 10 I normally only hit 15/16 if I feel it. It’s not very often but I go in thinking if i can always get 15/16 so can the dealer. Lol they have turned over 5s, and 6s and bust and it’s just luck or a feeling I get.
Thanks for the Video! Apologies for chiming in, I would appreciate your initial thoughts. Have you heard about - Trentvorty Generate Links Theorem (Have a quick look on google cant remember the place now)? It is a good one off guide for making money with a clever roulette system without the normal expense. Ive heard some extraordinary things about it and my cooworker at very last got great success with it.
I play this way. But I always make same bet everytime, I double and split most of the time, but mostly lose on doubles and mostly win on splits, I going to say I win 3 out of 5 sessions. I start with 2000 and bet 100 per hand. I would say every session would be a losing session but I always cash out when I'm 300 or more ahead at the end of a shoe, then I'll go eat of play video poker or whatever then go back to the table. It seems to work in my favor more often then not I belive because I can cash out when I want, one thing I have noticed is I am down from the beginning the best I can do is get even and cash out. I have played many shoes that I break even or up or down just 100.
@@GaryLuKOTH I agree with you it is not in my favor, I play three hands at a time this way I believe I get more aces, I'm not interested in counting cards, and keep my bets the same as up and down bets only makes me lose, my winning are small at 300 to 400, the most I ever won is 2000, I only sit down with 2000 and have only lost the full 2000 a few times. I like to play the shortest session possible, I hate it when I sit down and am down 3 to 600 right off the bat, I have tried using the little 21 cards but have not had much luck with them, seems the only way to win is to count cards that I know of? Ty for your help.
That is a bad strategy in general. In this video, he is playing with the No Bust strategy, which involves not hitting any hand that could possibly bust. Experiments show that it is worse than basic strategy.
I’ve played at a table with a guy using this strategy at Scarlet Pearl in Biloxi. And I sear to god with in 9:17 (nine minutes and seventeen seconds) he was down $3500 and yes I counted it was horrible to watch and every rebuy is was $500 all in 100 dollar bills.
Piedad Stoffel No way. 17 is bad, but it is a case in which it is not worth hitting because there is a slight chance that you draw if the dealer does not bust. If you have 16 or lower, you always lose and never draw if the dealer does not bust.
Didn't see enough play to judge if it is a good system or not. The video was like 8 minutes and I didn't see but a handful of hands that you stayed on. But the ones you did stay you lost so... Lol
I think that system is fine you were doing OK until you lost on yr doudles and from what I saw you would have busted by pulling a cars anyway.the goal is to win money fun comes after you win thousands
I've used a method where every 3rd hand I raise my bet to atleast double my regular bet. Seems to pay off. Although I watch the tables a few hands before I join in. Should post a video doing it. And the dealers deck was hot on this video. Mist of his hands were 18+ knowing this you should of took a bust card to switch the 10s to you..
@@GaryLuKOTH it's a strategy I use, obviously basic strategy is basic. It's like saying never split tens on a 2-4 always split tens on those it's a bust hand,
Stefan Johnson If I am not splitting 10s, I am making then mathematically right decision. Do not act like you are smarter than people who proved basic strategy.
@@GaryLuKOTH basic strategy is built for you to lose, you need to risk splitting tens in order to make huge profit. Any great player will tell you that.
You didn’t do the it right way when you loose a hand should martingale this next hand until you win and also never double down or spilt hands I guarantee you win
This wasn't really the best example of how bad the no-bust strategy really is. The player in this match really didn't have many hands different than basic strategy and the ones he did have, where he stayed to avoid busting, actually ended up working out regardless because the dealer had a hand and the next card would have busted the player anyway. A lot of no-bust strategies also do not allow for splitting or doubling. I've back tested these strategies and they really do not work in the long run. Sure, you could get lucky, but statistically you are much better off using basic strategy.
Vodka Tonic you’ve done your research on this topic? No bust, no split, no double down strategy doesn’t work. My goal is to just approach each hand as is. To just win that one bet
I've only seen about 4 hands that I would've pulled an extra card on. Also, playing by yourself is not the best strategy for this style of playing, as you can't see what's likely coming.
This s not a good strategy,u should take risk and play for example d last game u got 16verses d dealer 18,and d next game first card was ace and second was 4,if u would take. These two cards in d privious game d sum was 21and u would have won
the short run is meaningless you need thousands of hands to prove anything, but we already know this strategy produces poor results. My math says Standing on stiffs against dealer high cards cost you about 3%, so it's 600% worse than basic strategy.
I appreciate your effort and hard work, but this is not an accurate assessment of the no bust strategy....no bust doesn't double down, doesn't bet more than one unit, always lets it ride until third consecutive win, then takes profit while pushing one unit to up bet. And most importantly, no bust is never played one on one with the dealer, need at least 3 other players at the table...
I play my hand and $$ and went to Harrah’s Cherokee last weekend and crazy lady doubled down on a “A” and a “9” when Dealer had a “6” showing. The player pulled a 10 and Dealer had a face under and pulled a 5. Yep.....I walked from that table along with 3 other people.
My point in telling you the last story was the woman should have stayed on her 20. If someone is playing stupid.....then YES it can cause the other players to lose. Nothing in strategy suggests double downing on a A and 9.
What abt the free bet black jack is it worth playing if the dealer get extra cards to hit if it lands on 22 for instance let's say he has a 15 he gets 234567 u win if it 8 or higher sound like a RIP off even though they pay for dbl ups and splits standard black jack u won't have a problem with dbl ups if u want to bet on it
I have been gambling for 25 years and am amazed how rare it has been to see players focus on what is the most important aspect of gambling, money mgmnt, specifically, controlling losses.
I play this with a unit progression method for a loss: 1u, 2u, 3u, 5u, 8u, 13u… etc. and when you win you can drop two steps back; ie: win 13u bet 5u, win 5u bet 2u. I like playing this way personally, but maybe it’s because I just haven’t hit an unlucky streak on four deck blackjack yet.
You were put in the "don't bust" situation about two times in this session. Really couldn't ascertain much from this one video alone.
I have done it before actually how I learned to play. I would do that and watch what other people did at the table. I can tell you one thing for sure. Not too many people at the table were thrilled with me playing like that. I did think it was a good way to learn though. Definitely a lot more fun playing now knowing how to play right
You have 14, dealer has a 10 up. No bust says stay, basic says hit and a positive count in the decks agree with no bust and say to stay. Hitting 14 you have about a 56% chance of busting. The dealer w 10 up will bust about 20% of the time.
A few people believe wholeheartedly in this system. Mathematically, it's a disaster. I agree with you, primarily it's no fun to play!
Who cares about having fun if your winning. Shouldn't winning be enough fun?
When I was first learning Blackjack, I tried no bust a little. I very quickly learned that basic strategy was much more consistent and more profitable for me. Yes, winning is fun.
@@djquickspin4089 his point was you don't win and it's not fun, two strikes
You give the house an extra 4% edge mister "winning". I think in the past 5 months the few people I've seen do it only one won because he was on a lucky streak. Everyone else got absolutely crushed.
After experiencing a pattern I've just a few losses I would have bet it in 2 different are 3 different sections within the same round because I think that would have threw off the shoe to go in his favor
I’ve never seen anyone play this, but I’ve seen plenty of people really balk at hitting any 16. It’s astonishing.
I usually do very well at blackJack however when the dealer is showing an A or 10 I normally only hit 15/16 if I feel it. It’s not very often but I go in thinking if i can always get 15/16 so can the dealer. Lol they have turned over 5s, and 6s and bust and it’s just luck or a feeling I get.
Can you do a video using this system with a Martingale??? Would be very helpful
i have use a no bust in a positive and negative progression. with level 2 card counting A=0 unbalanced. win enough to equal 1/3 regular work income.
Alot of the losses would have been losses anyway.
Thanks for the Video! Apologies for chiming in, I would appreciate your initial thoughts. Have you heard about - Trentvorty Generate Links Theorem (Have a quick look on google cant remember the place now)? It is a good one off guide for making money with a clever roulette system without the normal expense. Ive heard some extraordinary things about it and my cooworker at very last got great success with it.
Yup
I play this way. But I always make same bet everytime, I double and split most of the time, but mostly lose on doubles and mostly win on splits, I going to say I win 3 out of 5 sessions. I start with 2000 and bet 100 per hand. I would say every session would be a losing session but I always cash out when I'm 300 or more ahead at the end of a shoe, then I'll go eat of play video poker or whatever then go back to the table. It seems to work in my favor more often then not I belive because I can cash out when I want, one thing I have noticed is I am down from the beginning the best I can do is get even and cash out. I have played many shoes that I break even or up or down just 100.
It is not in your favor. If it is, you should not have to leave while you are ahead. You should be playing for as long as you are able to.
@@GaryLuKOTH I agree with you it is not in my favor, I play three hands at a time this way I believe I get more aces, I'm not interested in counting cards, and keep my bets the same as up and down bets only makes me lose, my winning are small at 300 to 400, the most I ever won is 2000, I only sit down with 2000 and have only lost the full 2000 a few times. I like to play the shortest session possible, I hate it when I sit down and am down 3 to 600 right off the bat, I have tried using the little 21 cards but have not had much luck with them, seems the only way to win is to count cards that I know of? Ty for your help.
Music 0:40?? I love it
another great vid topic. What i do is apply the no bust method every other chance that comes up
2:44 stay on 13 against 10?
That is a bad strategy in general. In this video, he is playing with the No Bust strategy, which involves not hitting any hand that could possibly bust. Experiments show that it is worse than basic strategy.
Not only is it no fun to play it gives an increased advantage to theCasino
I'd like to see a few decks using this system. Ur right it's boring but would it work
I’ve played at a table with a guy using this strategy at Scarlet Pearl in Biloxi. And I sear to god with in 9:17 (nine minutes and seventeen seconds) he was down $3500 and yes I counted it was horrible to watch and every rebuy is was $500 all in 100 dollar bills.
That guy might of been me
Adding a money count throughout would be awesome and make videos all the more enjoyable
Doesn't matter if your having fun. U there to make profit right.
Can someone tell me if its good to play free bet black jack
The house edge is about 1.04% according to Wizard of Odds, which is not bad but you are better off playing regular blackjack.
I wonder how many times you'll be able to play the dealer 1 v 1?...
Not that that affects your odds. It can only affect your short term results, not your long term.
Best strategy ever. I get beaten by a lousy 17 all the time.
So what would u do hit a 17
Piedad Stoffel No way. 17 is bad, but it is a case in which it is not worth hitting because there is a slight chance that you draw if the dealer does not bust. If you have 16 or lower, you always lose and never draw if the dealer does not bust.
Keep the way
Stay calm
Double down if win
Bet minimum if lose
I still prefer people playing like this, than people who hit a 16 against dealer's 4,5,6 (and i ve seen a lot of them) ...that is more terrible
Or... those pesky 10 splitters!!
In this one you probably should of placed bets in two different spots to throw off the pattern of loses
Best logic of all time, assuming that the way you bet does something magical to whether or not you are winning or losing.
Oh, please remark on the tile or description that this is a new strategy that players shouldn't do on the table-!
It is not new. It has been used for a while. I do not mind if people use it though because it makes it easier for the casinos to make money.
I play a "low bust" system with progressive betting... Hit some 12's, fewer 13's, and nothing higher...
Didn't see enough play to judge if it is a good system or not. The video was like 8 minutes and I didn't see but a handful of hands that you stayed on. But the ones you did stay you lost so... Lol
That’s not true. He won at least 3 hands he stayed on.
Only way you could play this strategy is to have a buster bonus bet but even. With that buster bet you have to hit .
I think that system is fine you were doing OK until you lost on yr doudles and from what I saw you would have busted by pulling a cars anyway.the goal is to win money fun comes after you win thousands
At 1:50 you made a mistake. That's not no bust
I think this system would kick ass on a player shoe. Whatever makes you money as boring or mindless as it can be
Nah. Math proves that you will lose a huge amount of money if you play it for long enough.
The other thing is the betting strategy i work on a 9 hand i hand win out of 9 hands.
I've used a method where every 3rd hand I raise my bet to atleast double my regular bet. Seems to pay off. Although I watch the tables a few hands before I join in. Should post a video doing it. And the dealers deck was hot on this video. Mist of his hands were 18+ knowing this you should of took a bust card to switch the 10s to you..
That is not a mathematically proven strategy. It will lose in the long run. Learn basic strategy if you want to minimize your chances of losing.
@@GaryLuKOTH it's a strategy I use, obviously basic strategy is basic. It's like saying never split tens on a 2-4 always split tens on those it's a bust hand,
You guys clearly aren't understanding how to count a basic count on cards if you're not splitting tens.
Stefan Johnson If I am not splitting 10s, I am making then mathematically right decision. Do not act like you are smarter than people who proved basic strategy.
@@GaryLuKOTH basic strategy is built for you to lose, you need to risk splitting tens in order to make huge profit. Any great player will tell you that.
Is it just me or it’s satisfying.... I know I’m weird
Especially against a shoe
How to get 50 50 with the deal
Hit till you get 17
Math says that that is not 50/50. Nice try.
You didn’t do the it right way when you loose a hand should martingale this next hand until you win and also never double down or spilt hands I guarantee you win
You are right. It is no fun to play.
This wasn't really the best example of how bad the no-bust strategy really is. The player in this match really didn't have many hands different than basic strategy and the ones he did have, where he stayed to avoid busting, actually ended up working out regardless because the dealer had a hand and the next card would have busted the player anyway. A lot of no-bust strategies also do not allow for splitting or doubling. I've back tested these strategies and they really do not work in the long run. Sure, you could get lucky, but statistically you are much better off using basic strategy.
Vodka Tonic you’ve done your research on this topic? No bust, no split, no double down strategy doesn’t work. My goal is to just approach each hand as is. To just win that one bet
I've only seen about 4 hands that I would've pulled an extra card on. Also, playing by yourself is not the best strategy for this style of playing, as you can't see what's likely coming.
So if you playing with more people allows you to see what cards are coming next? Care to explain how that works?
Sidebets!!!
This s not a good strategy,u should take risk and play for example d last game u got 16verses d dealer 18,and d next game first card was ace and second was 4,if u would take. These two cards in d privious game d sum was 21and u would have won
the short run is meaningless you need thousands of hands to prove anything, but we already know this strategy produces poor results. My math says Standing on stiffs against dealer high cards cost you about 3%, so it's 600% worse than basic strategy.
try double down every time u have to hit lol
I Tried In Blackjack 21 WBT And That Success
I Have 1.650.000 Dollar
And I Play For 3 Hour
And Then I Get 7.000.000
If this system so great everyone would do it. I’m treading onward playing like I should but thanks anyway
No as long term it’s really not a good way to go. I play mostly for the action so this system would be to boring for me
I appreciate your effort and hard work, but this is not an accurate assessment of the no bust strategy....no bust doesn't double down, doesn't bet more than one unit, always lets it ride until third consecutive win, then takes profit while pushing one unit to up bet. And most importantly, no bust is never played one on one with the dealer, need at least 3 other players at the table...
Awful arguments. Other players do not change your odds of winning and not doubling down only makes you lose even more.
@@GaryLuKOTH by the looks of your page, you are 11 or 12 years old, so I won't get offended by your ignorance :)
THRIFT the WILD Let’s see who the ignorant one is here: the one who is assuming age and questioning proven mathematics or the one who is citing facts.
Not only is this method dumb and stupid. But I really get annoyed at people who play it at the table
It is fine. I love more suckers at the table.
I hit when it feels right and stay when it feels right
Not a mathematically proven strategy. It loses in the long run.
Just ask mark whalberg
Staying vs a 8, 9 or 10 is like flipping a coin. No fun at all
If you do everything 100% right u have a 51% chance of winning.
I will leave a table if the players do not play 90% strategy. You always hit 15 but may not hit 16.
You clearly do not play strategy either and why does it matter whether or not the other players play with strategy?
I play my hand and $$ and went to Harrah’s Cherokee last weekend and crazy lady doubled down on a “A” and a “9” when Dealer had a “6” showing. The player pulled a 10 and Dealer had a face under and pulled a 5. Yep.....I walked from that table along with 3 other people.
Linda Dodson That is someone else’s hand, not yours. You do not lose money if someone else loses.
My point in telling you the last story was the woman should have stayed on her 20. If someone is playing stupid.....then YES it can cause the other players to lose. Nothing in strategy suggests double downing on a A and 9.
Linda Dodson It can cause you to win too so your argument is not valid.
God brother
if you have a 15 or 16, it’s really a pick-your-poison moment.
If the dealer has an upcard of 7 or higher, most of the time, hitting is the less harmful poison.
Lost a ton of doubles
It's a good strategy cause u got 2 ways to win and 1 way to lose DEALER 2 ways to lose and 1 way to win
You never tried it yourself so you are not qualified to tell anyone what is a good strategy and what is not.
Explain the game
@@joegarcia3484 the player can't lose by busting then
Why didn't the guy take any cards stupid game if can't hit what abt the dealer he can keep hitting sounds like the house gets the advantage
What abt the free bet black jack is it worth playing if the dealer get extra cards to hit if it lands on 22 for instance let's say he has a 15 he gets 234567 u win if it 8 or higher sound like a RIP off even though they pay for dbl ups and splits standard black jack u won't have a problem with dbl ups if u want to bet on it
A very expensive way to play blackjack
A better way to do this: give the money to the dealer and skip the playing part :)
Double down evrything!!!!!! Lol
Don't play the DEALER one on one
The sad thing is that I cannot tell if you are trolling or just being totally ignorant.
@@GaryLuKOTH well just play basic strategy then
Piedad Stoffel That is probably the only good blackjack advice you have ever given.
@@GaryLuKOTH the sad thing is basic strategy is for losers
@@GaryLuKOTH the sad thing is u believe in basic strategy and that won't get ya nothing about it
we are all losing because we take our $100 or $1000 or $5000 bankroll up against the casino's infiinite bankroll.
Bankroll size is irrelevant. Card counters have a smaller bankroll than casinos but casinos still do not like them.