So my GM rep corrected me about the Traverse's cargo volume; it DID NOT GET SMALLER FOR 2018. It's actually BIGGER. But based upon the new SAE guidelines for measuring such things the numbers went down.
My husband has one. We've already filled all 8 seats when combining cars, and everyone was comfortable. This thing feels luxurious. Not something I expected out of Chevy. My husband is 6'3" and struggles fitting in vehicles. His hair stuck out the sunroof of the Acadia. This vehicle fits him perfectly. Long drives are very comfortable. Very happy with the purchase.
Wow styling that actually looks great on a new car and doesn’t look like it will age quickly. The lower trims definitely don’t look as good, but this is nice!
That is a nice looking ride. I just got a 15 traverse used to replace an Escape. We needed the extra room and the extra row is helpful when doing stuff with extended family.
I was wondering what the ground clearance is on this vehicle? If I was to take it off the pavement, that is important to me. The VW Atlas is a Traverse competitor and the ground clearance on the Atlas is 8 inches. Pretty good for this type of vehicle.
what's the long term opinion? I have been a Honda / Toyota buyer for years. I'm still in love with my 2011 Honda Pilot..all boxy. I do not like the new Pilot design Trying the choice dance between: Toyota Highlander, Toyota 4Runner, Hyundai whatever or Kia whatever ...but then the Traverse arrived on the scene...very nice looking SUV. American cars used to have the sting of not being as long lasting as the Toyota /Honda folks. So... is Chevy good to last? - and I ask this keeping mind I do not drive big cars like small sports vehicles...I know that's a game changer. Any vehicle, even the long lasting ones, can be destroyed early on by folks with concrete shoes.
I won't be surprised if the vast majority of owners who have the rear view camera mirror won't know they have that feature. So they will see that flip switch and think they just have a conventional day/night mirror and use it as such.
hate that all 3 row crossovers try hard to push the market towards captain chairs in the second row, 99% of the time I would like to keep my car 5 passenger and only add third row when there are more than 5 passengers. would like to see a 5 passenger plus their luggage score.
Cha'Vis Berrien85 Agreed explorer and the highlander are both up there, both are very reliable, but the explorer takes it for me because it looks better and feels better to drive imo.
Steve, I have a prediction. I think the new redesigned Buick Enclave is in the pipeline when you, the kiddo, and the Mrs. make a spring break trip. GM, are you reading this?
Steve, while I know the Armada is a BOF SUV, I do wonder if the comfy drive of that is a worthy tradeoff for some of the modern tech here in the Traverse.
bassandtrebleclef That’s a good point. The Armada is more of a Tahoe and less of a Traverse. The Pathfinder is this Chevy’s competitor and while both are very good, I’d lean Chevy.
Teddy Hi, Teddy. No - the twin-clutch AWD system in use here splits torque between the rear wheels for improved control and handling. It also aids in efficiency. The automatic transmission in use here is a traditional type.
all right, basically its a "switch" to balance torque output on different rd conditions. It did decorate the traverse a little bit. the bad news, however, is that gm is pushing customers to pay more if they would like to try it. After all, its only available for high country, the top trim which costs more than 53k bucks. Thx for explanation and wait to see how new traverse performs on snowy rd.
Teddy Well actually it's just GMs terminology for mechanical rear torque vectoring. Like you would find in some of the Acuras with SH-AWD, also in some AWD BMWs and Audi's. In order to fully appreciate the significance of mechanical torque vectoring you have to keep in mind that a conventional rear( or front) differential has a fundamental problem. The basic concept of a differential is that it splits torque between two sides(wheels in the case of rear and front differentials) evenly(50/50). However because of the complex gearing system differentials use, it can spin both sides equally, one side faster then the other, or spin on side entirely. It does this based on friction, which means the wheel with the least traction spins the fastest. So if one wheel has traction and the other doesn't, you're not going anywhere. And seeing how torque is based on friction, it means that the amount of torque you produce is limited by the wheel with the least traction. Torque vectoring fixes this problem as it allows up to 100% of the torque being sent to the rear differential to go one wheel. So if the electronically controlled torque vectoring differential decides to send 100% of the torque to the wheel with all the traction that means that enough torque can be generated to start moving the car forward. But keep in mind traction control can do exactly the same thing with ABS by individually braking certain wheels, as it creates enough friction to stop spinning the wheel with the least traction and start spinning the wheel with the most traction. Some vehicles do this a lot better then others and some companies don't do it at. Subarus typically do this very well, especially in x mode. I hope that explanation helps and isn't too confusing. Basically to some it up, on a conventional differential the amount torque produced is limited by the wheel with the least traction. In the Traverse with twin clutch AWD that problem doesn't exist, at least not on the rear differential. It can send all the torque, available to the rear, to whichever wheel it wants, meaning torque produced is limited only by the wheel with the most traction instead of the least. And that is certainly a good thing.
Nice vehicle; too bad standard safety features on the $31k Toyota Highlander will cost you nearly $53k on the Chevrolet Traverse!!! WTF GM!!! SAFETY SHOULD NOT BE OPTIONAL!!!
andy Walczewski correct, GM wants their high end model to get good impressions, I went with the lower 3lt leather trim and has everything this one has for $5k less
So my GM rep corrected me about the Traverse's cargo volume; it DID NOT GET SMALLER FOR 2018. It's actually BIGGER. But based upon the new SAE guidelines for measuring such things the numbers went down.
True lies or something to that effect?
Honestly thought this was from the news, it is very well produced
TestDriveNow Reviews by Auto Critic Ste
My husband has one. We've already filled all 8 seats when combining cars, and everyone was comfortable. This thing feels luxurious. Not something I expected out of Chevy. My husband is 6'3" and struggles fitting in vehicles. His hair stuck out the sunroof of the Acadia. This vehicle fits him perfectly. Long drives are very comfortable. Very happy with the purchase.
Chevy hit this one out of the park. A sensible, techy, practical , good looking 7/8 seater that won't break the bank
A $54,000 drive won't break the bank? Really?
Lana In America $54k is top level for 3 row crossovers. Most of these average $45k.
Like the Tahoe/Yukon,you can find these heavily discounted. Even the 2018 High Country.
ktpinnacle where?! I'm interested in buying one..
What part of the country are you?
What a voice! A strong asset for doing business.
Wow they've come a really long way and I have to admit this is way better than I was expecting
Great Review Steve. This design is a big improvement over the first gen.
canonlybeme4life It really is.
Wow styling that actually looks great on a new car and doesn’t look like it will age quickly. The lower trims definitely don’t look as good, but this is nice!
If you want all the luxury goods without the High Country price tag for your Traverse, get the Premier edition.
Very similar. You're right.
Billy Sou only issue you lose the brown interior, if you care for it
Nice car reviewed by Mr. Steve Hammes. Good job sir, as usuall.
Thank you!
That is a nice looking ride. I just got a 15 traverse used to replace an Escape. We needed the extra room and the extra row is helpful when doing stuff with extended family.
this thing is actually pretty damn quick. it averages 0-60 in 6.6 - 6.7 sec and has a top speed of 130mph
CAMARO_KYLE 160mph not 130mph
Ahmad Al amoudi how is that even possible?
look at the speedometer it's 160mph
Ahmad Al amoudi its limited to 130
CAMARO_KYLE 😮 ok i know what do you mean ok ok 👌
Hi, Steve. Great review as usual. Where do you live? Just curious because those are some really nice views in the first shot.
This is better then I excepted. It will sell well
Great review Steve!!
Awesome review, thank you so much for being so consistent!
No need for an Escalade unless you like to brag. Steve, you are so convincing in your reviews, hard to say no to any vehicle you review.
pedro fernandez Ha! Thanks, Pedro. I’m just telling it as I see it
I like it but I'll probably upgrade to the buick
Like the shape of it
Determined Gamer p
Pelocoolas.
MexicanaS
Looks great in this color!
This car is beautiful
I was wondering what the ground clearance is on this vehicle? If I was to take it off the pavement, that is important to me. The VW Atlas is a Traverse competitor and the ground clearance on the Atlas is 8 inches. Pretty good for this type of vehicle.
Enclave is 7.7 inches. Interesting how that info on the Traverse is tough to find.
ktpinnacle, Thank you.
what's the long term opinion? I have been a Honda / Toyota buyer for years. I'm still in love with my 2011 Honda Pilot..all boxy. I do not like the new Pilot design Trying the choice dance between: Toyota Highlander, Toyota 4Runner, Hyundai whatever or Kia whatever ...but then the Traverse arrived on the scene...very nice looking SUV. American cars used to have the sting of not being as long lasting as the Toyota /Honda folks. So... is Chevy good to last? - and I ask this keeping mind I do not drive big cars like small sports vehicles...I know that's a game changer. Any vehicle, even the long lasting ones, can be destroyed early on by folks with concrete shoes.
Agree with you on GM steering wheel ..
Yeah, it's really bad. Membrane buttons don't wear well.
Great review Steve, thank you. But I have to say, it is missing a 3rd row middle seat head rest. Not a good decision. I hope GM will put it back.
You know, I didn't pick up on that. Thanks for the tip.
The middle seat third row headrest is rare, as is a third seat in the third row..
Seems really nice and configurable, especially in this High Country trim. Wonder what the Enclave Avenir adds?
I won't be surprised if the vast majority of owners who have the rear view camera mirror won't know they have that feature. So they will see that flip switch and think they just have a conventional day/night mirror and use it as such.
mx5hong My buddy has a Cadillac with it and said he can’t use it because his prescription lenses won’t allow him to focus on the screen. Interesting.
hate that all 3 row crossovers try hard to push the market towards captain chairs in the second row, 99% of the time I would like to keep my car 5 passenger and only add third row when there are more than 5 passengers. would like to see a 5 passenger plus their luggage score.
They never take the option away.
This is my dream car
Great review. What would your pick be for the best 3row suv?
Ricky S There are many good choices but GM makes some of the best in a number of classes.
Ricky S Explorer Platinum
Durango SRT.... if you have 70k laying around
Cha'Vis Berrien85 Agreed explorer and the highlander are both up there, both are very reliable, but the explorer takes it for me because it looks better and feels better to drive imo.
Steve, I have a prediction. I think the new redesigned Buick Enclave is in the pipeline when you, the kiddo, and the Mrs. make a spring break trip. GM, are you reading this?
Billy Sou We’ve taken an Enclave to Maine before and I certainly would invite another opportunity! GM makes great travel SUVs.
Steve, while I know the Armada is a BOF SUV, I do wonder if the comfy drive of that is a worthy tradeoff for some of the modern tech here in the Traverse.
bassandtrebleclef That’s a good point. The Armada is more of a Tahoe and less of a Traverse. The Pathfinder is this Chevy’s competitor and while both are very good, I’d lean Chevy.
How about the Mazda CX-9?
Yeah. I like that, too. ruclips.net/video/yg95B0AjNSo/видео.html
What does he mean by "stop and go", with regard to adaptive cruise control?
With Stop & Go the adaptive cruise control will perform low-speed, congested traffic driving not just at highway speeds.
Great review. It looks like an m class to me
So I thought I was going to trade my Buick Enclave but I guess I'll just get another 1 because it's the SAME DAMN THING😂😂
I like the steering wheel
Not a bad car at all.
Nice review of both High Country and Buick Enclave Avenir. Which one would you recommend better for their price point?
I's stick with the Traverse. Buick didn't offer enough separation.
How is off roading like in a desert ?
When It's Come at India
Can you please review the Mercedes GLS crossover especially the 450 or the 550? Thanks
Saravanan M I had a 63 on my schedule a year ago but it was cancelled. I’ll see if we can finally make that happen.
A great american car!
Did he say a rear seat entertainment IS available with or without a DVD player? Is that correct?
CMUBruin That is correct. They offer 2 different systems.
how many miles do you get on a full tank of gas?
440 miles
twin clutch means what? The transmission? Just like VW's dual clutch?
Teddy Hi, Teddy. No - the twin-clutch AWD system in use here splits torque between the rear wheels for improved control and handling. It also aids in efficiency. The automatic transmission in use here is a traditional type.
all right, basically its a "switch" to balance torque output on different rd conditions. It did decorate the traverse a little bit. the bad news, however, is that gm is pushing customers to pay more if they would like to try it. After all, its only available for high country, the top trim which costs more than 53k bucks. Thx for explanation and wait to see how new traverse performs on snowy rd.
Teddy Well actually it's just GMs terminology for mechanical rear torque vectoring. Like you would find in some of the Acuras with SH-AWD, also in some AWD BMWs and Audi's. In order to fully appreciate the significance of mechanical torque vectoring you have to keep in mind that a conventional rear( or front) differential has a fundamental problem. The basic concept of a differential is that it splits torque between two sides(wheels in the case of rear and front differentials) evenly(50/50). However because of the complex gearing system differentials use, it can spin both sides equally, one side faster then the other, or spin on side entirely. It does this based on friction, which means the wheel with the least traction spins the fastest. So if one wheel has traction and the other doesn't, you're not going anywhere. And seeing how torque is based on friction, it means that the amount of torque you produce is limited by the wheel with the least traction. Torque vectoring fixes this problem as it allows up to 100% of the torque being sent to the rear differential to go one wheel. So if the electronically controlled torque vectoring differential decides to send 100% of the torque to the wheel with all the traction that means that enough torque can be generated to start moving the car forward. But keep in mind traction control can do exactly the same thing with ABS by individually braking certain wheels, as it creates enough friction to stop spinning the wheel with the least traction and start spinning the wheel with the most traction. Some vehicles do this a lot better then others and some companies don't do it at. Subarus typically do this very well, especially in x mode.
I hope that explanation helps and isn't too confusing. Basically to some it up, on a conventional differential the amount torque produced is limited by the wheel with the least traction. In the Traverse with twin clutch AWD that problem doesn't exist, at least not on the rear differential. It can send all the torque, available to the rear, to whichever wheel it wants, meaning torque produced is limited only by the wheel with the most traction instead of the least. And that is certainly a good thing.
Most will get the LT level
Nice vehicle; too bad standard safety features on the $31k Toyota Highlander will cost you nearly $53k on the Chevrolet Traverse!!! WTF GM!!! SAFETY SHOULD NOT BE OPTIONAL!!!
Ummmmm dude...... basically every steering wheel out there looks the same to me.
review the ones everyone can afford, these high country reviews are a waste of time for normal mid income people.
andy Walczewski Not true. You can extrapolate from the top trim down. Plus, this is what GM stocks in the press fleet - not my choice.
andy Walczewski correct, GM wants their high end model to get good impressions, I went with the lower 3lt leather trim and has everything this one has for $5k less
That 'c' pillar is really w i d e. Otherwise a good buy.
이번카니발 수명끝나면 무조건 트래버스로간다
Wow. He has one kid and talks about a family vehicle which is a 3 row SUV. 😂
MrBury74 ...and he mentioned how that kid has friends he often transports and how he has a large extended family he’s responsible for...
The Pacifica is better in every way.
Parker Weatly that’s not a crossover
when a van fu** jeep =⬆
Nice looking SUV, doesn’t have very good options. 45k and no leather. Went with the Durango GT instead. More bang for your buck.
design like a hyundaj. we dont like hyundai kia